Sam Hyde has released a new self-help video which is something of a follow-up on his video criticizing Elon Musk’s H-1B scheme.

On the Elon video, he posted a phone number for people to leave voice mails, and he plays several of those and responds to them with sold self-help advice.

Sam is one of my favorite people and I hope he keeps up this routine of public videos. I think he was still doing subscription stuff, but I didn’t see any of it because I am not allowed to use Visa/MasterCard for the rest of my life because I made fun of an obese woman who had a heart attack during a traffic accident.

As you can see above, the video is age-gated on YouTube, which is a soft (hard?) form of censorship that YouTube uses to stifle popular videos they disagree with. The video has no inappropriate content.

But you can watch it on Twitter.

Dear Vivek: pic.twitter.com/tQzWG58Mqm

— Sam Hyde 🇺🇸 (@wigger) January 21, 2025

Sam will probably be banned from Twitter again soon enough. I’m sure Elon didn’t think much of his viral criticism.

When Elon admitted to being a total Fraud Gamer in a DM chat with some random fat guy, he also admitted that he holds grudges against people who criticize him, even if their criticism is all true. He said he has no desire to work with Asmongold or Quin69 because they “trashed him,” despite the fact that everything they said was true, and Elon now admits that they were right in claiming he is a total fraud.

Laura Loomer got her blue check back, but she suggested (without directly stating it) that she had to personally call Trump and tell Trump to tell Elon to give her back her check. Others that lost their checks for criticizing Elon’s planned “Shit Tsunami” from India did not get their checks back.

I think everyone is going to get banned or at least censored on Twitter. Elon banned people for the lowest level things before the administration even started, so what is he going to do when shit gets hot?

I was banned for masturbating to the wrong image of a semi-nude woman two years ago, with no option for appeal.

There is certainly a lot of talk about freedom of speech, but right now Sam Hyde is soft-banned on YouTube and while he is on Twitter, no one really has any confidence he’ll be there long-term. And Sam is pretty mainstream. He had a show on the Cartoon Network and he did that big event with Keemstar.

So what of the rest of us?

I understand I’m the most extreme case of censorship in the world ever, and I don’t really even expect to get unbanned from anything – at least not until the US Empire collapses – but the freedom situation is not good at all and I don’t see Trump actually doing anything to address it.

Based on his plan for the US government to buy TikTok, if that actually happens, it would be illegal for them to censor it. So, maybe that’s a way out. I sort of doubt it, but okay.

I don’t agree with Sam about not beating your kids. This “peaceful parenting” horseshit has been used since the boomers, and if you look around, it sure as hell does not look like it worked very well. You should beat your kids if they deserve it and you should also make them butcher animals.

If you have a chance, take them to a public execution like in Game of Thrones.

Note that this beheading video is not age-gated on YouTube.

I don’t think I need to explain that age-gating is always censorship, as everyone knows that all of this other stuff is public on the platform. But why is Sam Hyde even ostensibly age-gated? Because he said the f-word (“fuck” not “faggot”)? There are billions of videos on YouTube that say “fuck” and I think at this point we all understand that this word is no longer “obscenity” because it is so widely used in society.

The video is totally worth watching.

Illegal hate speech is a systemic threat for democracy & fundamental rights.

The new ‘Code of conduct on countering illegal hate speech online +’ integrated into the DSA is crucial to strengthen how online platforms deal with illegal hate speech content.

More ↓ @EU_Justice

— Digital EU 🇪🇺 (@DigitalEU) January 20, 2025

The US could easily put pressure on Europe and force them to accept American standards for freedom of speech.

It would be very easy.

The only reason the EU is so strict about speech is because the US pressured them in the first place.

Reuters:

Meta’s Facebook, Elon Musk’s X, Google’s YouTube and other tech companies have agreed to do more to tackle online hate speech under an updated code of conduct that will now be integrated into EU tech rules, the European Commission said on Monday.

Other signatories to the voluntary code set up in May 2016 are Dailymotion, Instagram, Jeuxvideo.com, LinkedIn, Microsoft hosted consumer services, Snapchat, Rakuten Viber, TikTok and Twitch.

“In Europe there is no place for illegal hate, either offline or online. I welcome the stakeholders’ commitment to a strengthened Code of conduct under the Digital Services Act (DSA),” EU tech commissioner Henna Virkkunen said in a statement.

…

Under the revised code, the companies pledged to allow not-for-profit or public entities with expertise on illegal hate speech to monitor how they review hate speech notices, and to assess at least two thirds of these notices received from them within 24 hours.

More meaningful than banning trannies and DEI (which were already on their way out) would be if the Trump Administration forced the EU to respect American freedom of speech laws.

That’s probably not totally beyond the scope of things Trump would be willing to do. People would still get arrested in Europe for speech, of course, but he could prevent the EU from being able to fine American companies for allowing free speech.

“The DSA does not censor content. It creates efficient mechanism for the removal of illegal content defined by other EU or national law,such as illegal hate speech.Because what is illegal offline is also illegal online”@HennaVirkkunen –#DSA debate

📹https://t.co/nWDqHxpSxj pic.twitter.com/ZnsSrfpJ3f

— European Parliament Audiovisual Service (@europarlAV) January 21, 2025

I hardly ever watch YouTube. Most of my information, I read, as that is much easier. If I want some sound in the background to prevent me from having to manage my own thoughts, I listen to Rumble or normal podcasts.

When I do go to YouTube, it is just to watch Judge Napolitano’s interviews and a few other interview shows from people who don’t understand podcast feeds. I do not have YouTube cookies.

Every time I watch anything, which is basically always right-wing or libertarian content, I get redirected to the same communist Jew, Richard Wolff, host of Democracy At Work. I do not mean “communist Jew” in the colloquial sense of a cultural Marxist or something, this guy is literally an 80-year old Holocaust-escaper communist Jew.

I’ve used multiple IPs and devices and confirmed what anyone can confirm: if you go on YouTube with no cookies and watch 2-3 interviews about current events from a right-wing perspective, you will be redirected to the communist Jew Richard Wolff.

No one would watch this show. It is not high information. This 80-year-old Jew literally sounds like a high schooler who just started listening to Noam Chomsky YouTube videos because he heard him referenced on a punk rock album.

Don’t get me wrong. I actually have some respect here. He defends the USSR and modern China, and doesn’t talk about any of this “woke” stuff. He appears to just legit believe in communism.

But why am I seeing this material?

As you may recall, after Trump’s 2016 election, there was a mass hysteria over the YouTube algorithm “radicalizing” people. The claim was that it would feed people progressive more extreme right-wing content, so you would go from listening to Ben Shapiro to the Daily Stormer podcast. In reality, the algorithm doesn’t understand content (well, it didn’t back then), and it was simply trying to feed you content that would keep you on the site as long as possible, to show you the most ads, and it just so happened that “progressively more extreme right-wing content” is what kept people on the site the longest.

The algorithm was just formalizing the process that a lot of people were going through in 2017, where you start to become more and more comfortable with certain “problematic” ideas, and that leads you to progressively more problematic ideas. But the New York Times and others of course called for it to all be shut down. And shut it down they did.

What was happening after that, which I witnessed through the same process described above, was that after you watched something that YouTube had marked as “far right” (and not banned yet, for whatever reason), you would be led to either Ben Shapiro or Jordan Peterson, which have been identified as “deradicalizers” by the Google authorities. So, it was actively attempting to reverse your dive into right-wing content by pushing you back into Jew-approved versions of “right-wing” content.

But now apparently they’re just like “whatever, just feed them communism.”

It seems like this would not work quiet as well as feeding people Ben Shapiro, but it seems likely that feeding people Ben Shapiro just made them angry, while this 80-year-old communist Jew just makes people laugh.

Honestly, it seems like someone at the company is having a laugh. This has happened to me probably 12 times in the last few months, and every time I am zoned out (or zoned in) and not really paying attention to the computer voice, and then I hear “rights for workers” and I’m like “wait, wtf?” And then I look at the screen and see this ancient Jew droning on about Karl Marx and start laughing.

It’s of course sad that everything has to be so censored. Rumble has no discovery, really. It has “free speech,” but you have to know what you want to see, or it will lead you to Dave Rubin. But I’ve enjoyed Rumble. I was watching it yesterday, and I whistled for a cab, and when it came near, the license plate said “fresh” and there were dice in the mirror. If anything I could say that this cab was rare, but I thought “naw forget it, yo home to bel-air!” I pulled up to the house about seven or eight and I yelled to the cabbie “yo homes smell ya later!” Looked at my kingdom, I was finally there. To settle my throne as the prince of bel-air.

I do not believe MrBeast. If there is one thing I know about the man, it’s that he really, really hates the Jews.

I have zero doubt that he put up these antisemitic billboards and then blamed hackers.

His plan is to constantly increase the hatred of the Jews while deflecting blame so he can keep rolling in the dough.

New York Post:

Hackers took over two billboards outside of Chicago to display vile, antisemitic messages including “death to Israel” — bizarrely trying to pin it on YouTube sensation MrBeast, who immediately got his lawyers involved.

Commuters heading home through the Chicago suburb of Northbrook — which has a large Jewish population — were horrified by the hateful display on Wednesday night, the first night of the Jewish holiday of Sukkot.

“F–k ISRAEL,” read one of the billboards, while the other said: “DEATH TO ISRAEL.”

Both were printed over a Palestinian flag above the message “paid for by MrBeast LLC” — something vehemently denied by the wildly popular YouTuber, whose real name is Jimmy Donaldson.

“MrBeast did not pay for this billboard,” his rep told Fox 32 Chicago.

“After being made aware of its existence, we contacted our attorneys and the authorities about how to have it immediately removed.”

The Beast Man has been pushing this agenda for years. In 2022, he allegedly gave me $25,000 and told me to “stick it to the kikes – right where the sun don’t shine.”

I allegedly turned down the money, because I don’t take money from tranny-lovers. I was also uncomfortable at the meeting, where he kept making that face at me. I immediately contacted my lawyers.

can we please start the “mr beast smile challenge” trend where people try their best to recreate mr breast’s completely lifeless smile pic.twitter.com/NPexVzOuhJ

— N0r🅱️ertas ☮🇺🇦 (@N0rbertas) October 11, 2024

We have to protect the children from being fit and healthy.

We need fat kids.

We need a bunch of little piglets.

They are very profitable.

The Guardian:

YouTube is to stop recommending videos to teenagers that idealise specific fitness levels, body weights or physical features, after experts warned such content could be harmful if viewed repeatedly.

The platform will still allow 13- to 17-year-olds to view the videos, but its algorithms will not push young users down related content “rabbit holes” afterwards.

YouTube said such content did not breach its guidelines but that repeated viewing of it could affect the wellbeing of some users.

YouTube’s global head of health, Dr Garth Graham, said: “As a teen is developing thoughts about who they are and their own standards for themselves, repeated consumption of content featuring idealised standards that starts to shape an unrealistic internal standard could lead some to form negative beliefs about themselves.”

This bitch’s biggest problem is that she has no self-esteem. She used to have some, but she ate it.

YouTube said experts on its youth and families advisory committee had said that certain categories that may be “innocuous” as a single video could be “problematic” if viewed repeatedly.

The new guidelines, now introduced in the UK and around the world, apply to content that: idealises some physical features over others, such as beauty routines to make your nose look slimmer; idealises fitness or body weights, such as exercise routines that encourage pursuing a certain look; or encourages social aggression, such as physical intimidation.

YouTube will no longer make repeated recommendations of those topics to teenagers who have registered their age with the platform as logged-in users. The safety framework has already been introduced in the US.

…

In the UK, the newly introduced Online Safety Act requires tech companies to protect children from harmful content, as well as considering how their algorithms may expose under-18s to damaging material. The act refers to algorithms’ ability to cause harm by pushing large amounts of content to a child over a short space of time, and requires tech companies to assess any risk such algorithms could pose to children.

Sonia Livingstone, a professor of social psychology at the London School of Economics, said a recent report by the Children’s Society charity underlined the importance of tackling social media’s impact on self-esteem. A survey in the Good Childhood report showed that nearly one in four girls in the UK were dissatisfied with their appearance.

Considering a lot more than 1 in 4 teenagers are overweight or obese, that number should be much, much higher.

Stop worrying about type 2 diabetes and start being offended by this

You probably remember Lauren Chen. She’s an attractive hapa from YouTube who made videos against feminism or whatever. I don’t watch videos made by women, but I was aware of her. She’s popular.

She may be getting indicted by the Department of Justice for being a Russian spy.

In an unsealed indictment the DoJ released this week, claiming that RT was funding her company, Tenet Media. Allegedly, they gave her $10 million, and the company never registered under the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA), which made this an illegal spying operation, according to the feds.

Tenet was not named in the indictment, but it was easy to figure out who they were talking about.

Thus far, only people from RT have been indicted – or rather, only their indictments have been unsealed – but it seems obvious that Chen and her husband are going to also be indicted as Russian spies.

WIRED has an article going through the details that the government is giving.

Here is Jewish Attorney General Merrick “Garland” Garfinkel laying out his case:

AG Merrick Garland unveils a series of targeted actions against Russia’s election interference efforts, saying Putin’s “inner circle” directed companies to “promote disinformation … as part of a program to influence the 2024 U.S. presidential election.” https://t.co/PzYR4zN3vI pic.twitter.com/KTfDB21om8

— ABC News Politics (@ABCPolitics) September 4, 2024

Tenet hired Tim Pool, Benny Johnson, Dave Rubin, and others. Allegedly, 90% of their income was coming from the Russians, and the DoJ has evidence that they knew where the money was coming from, even though there were some attempts to disguise it.

At one point, they were waiting on their money, and they googled “time in Russia,” apparently to see if the Russians were awake yet. That’s a weird piece of proof, but I guess it is proof.

YouTube has now removed the channels of the company. They also deleted Chen’s personal channel, which has videos going back to long before she is accused of being involved with Russia. Mind you, she has yet to be charged, let alone convicted of anything.

Tim Pool is denouncing the who thing, trying to keep from getting thrown under the bus.

Pool has made tens of millions of dollars, mostly completely unrelated to Chen’s Russian shill operation, but I wouldn’t be surprised if the DoJ freezes all his accounts and moves to shut him down.

Frankly, the stated allegations appear to be true. It’s unlikely that it was all made up whole-cloth. I don’t know that I believe it’s Russians, but someone gave Chen a bunch of money.

If it was actually Russians, I will defend these Russian shilling. There is a really easy basis on which to defend these Russian shills: “But what about Israel??”

Ben Shapiro, Dennis Prager, and virtually the entire US Congress are paid agents of Israel, working on Israel’s behalf, and none of them are registered as foreign agents, because there is a narrative that whatever is good for Israel is good for the United States. There is no basis for that narrative, and I could just as easily claim that whatever is good for Russia is good for the United States. In fact, I do claim that, constantly, basically every day.

What’s more, the US is super-hypocritical for whining about Russia paying Americans to influence American policy, given that the US does this literally everywhere in the world. They don’t even have to pay people, because they’ve devised a system where their own social media companies – pretending to be “private companies” – go all over the world and influence politics. Further, the US was funding a gay-anal-vaginism website called “Meduza” in Russia, which was very popular, and Russia didn’t shut it down until the war started. They labeled it a “foreign agent” and then let it continue to operate.

You cannot totally stop foreign countries from using the internet. FARA is a law that existed before the internet – it was passed in 1938 – and was not really in use until they started charging people from the Trump Administration with it. Remember that the US has started riots in Georgia against that country’s attempt to pass a FARA of their own.

Here’s an article from the Council on Foreign Relations claiming that forcing foreign agents to register is a Russian conspiracy, and that requiring foreign agents to register destroys democracy.

Furthermore: Tenet Media was founded nearly three years ago, in January of 2022. From the way the reporting on this story sounds, the company was started with Russian money, and that would mean that the DoJ knew about it from the start. You can’t really keep this sort of thing secret. Maybe you could keep the communications sort of secret (though probably not), but you definitely can’t keep ten million dollars going into a US bank account secret. So they knew about this, and are just now announcing it before the election. Apparently, they want to prove, yet again, that Russia supports Donald Trump.

We’re all the way back to 2016, and the “Russian interference” gibberish.

Hilariously – I think this is hilarious – Putin has endorsed Kamala Harris, citing her “infectious laughter.”

Putin never says anything that isn’t sarcastic. That’s his style and certainly, aside from his competence, one of the main reasons he’s so popular in Russia. Russians would rather hear things from the government stated in the form of hardened sarcasm, rather than earnestly.

In reality, even though Donald Trump is more or less useless, Russia probably would prefer him, as there is at least a chance he will end the Ukraine war. There is a chance Kamala would as well, because this has all gotten extremely expensive, and there is no stated goal of the operation. But, all things considered, Trump is more likely to slow or stop the flow of armaments to the Ukraine, if for no other reason than that he wants to send everything to Israel (and maybe the Philippines, we don’t really know what his thinking is on that, because this current election doesn’t have anything to do with issues).

That said, Chen was telling people not to vote for Trump. This is from just a couple weeks ago:

Furthermore, Tenet was not making a lot of videos supporting Russia. Most of these videos were the same slop about “culture war” and “politics” that we are all too familiar with. And they were not even getting significant views.

Most right-wingers are already against the Ukraine war, so there wasn’t really any reason for Russia to pay them to do that.

There is a possibility that this is all some kind of hoax – that feds went to Chen and paid her $10 million while pretending to be Russians.

I can tell you as a matter of fact that I’ve never gotten any money from Russia or (which would probably be more likely) China. It seems like if they were going to offer anyone money, it would be me. I’m the top shill, and I’m also the most influential. That’s a fact. I might only get 25 million views a month, but everyone copies my material. That’s very well-established. All popular right-wing content producers who are not total Israel shills copy my stuff, so I am the prime candidate for an influence operation. I’m also very good with secure communications, and I don’t even live in the United States. And yet, I’ve never once been approached.

This is anecdotal – sort of – but the fact no one has ever asked me to shill for them makes me wonder if this is even a real thing. Russia already has RT, which is very popular globally (even after it was kicked off of YouTube), and again, the fact of the matter is, most right-wingers naturally support the Russian position. Hiring people through some shady scheme in order to promote the idea that the Ukraine war is bad or that Trump is better than Kamala is sort of a ridiculous plot.

So, while the current evidence presented by the DoJ does seem to indicate there was a bunch of money coming from somewhere – which sort of has to be true, given the amounts they were paying people (they paid Dave Rubin $400,000 per month) for content that was not hardly getting any views, it might make more sense that this is some kind of false flag operation.

It ultimately can’t be proven either way. However, media is suggesting that Chen might not actually be charged. If that is the case, I think it’s safe to say the whole thing was completely fake. Right now, they’ve only indicted Russians who are outside of their jurisdiction and who they know they will never arrest, so they can just accuse them of anything. But if they were to take Chen to court, she would have a bunch of lawyers, and they would be able to do discovery and figure out more details about where exactly the money was coming from.

If Chen really was knowingly taking money from Russians in order to “undermine our sacred democracy,” then there is no reason not to charge her, unless the whole thing is fake. Frankly, the fact that they didn’t announce charges against her at the same time they announced the charges against the Russians says a lot.

The feds pretending to be Russians and giving a bunch of money to random YouTubers and then coming out two months before the election and saying there’s a big Russian scam against our democracy, in my opinion, makes more sense than an actual Russian plot to tell YouTubers to talk about things they were already talking about.

I was watching a documentary about Super Mario Brothers, enjoying my bi-weekly* McDonald’s breakfast yesterday, and I saw that there was a special YouTube logo with eyes. It was not so long ago that I would have thought it was maybe a promo for a League of Legends tournament. But I knew it was some kind of tranny think.

I hovered over to find: “Meet the Drag Community.”

It almost made me want to cry, like a little child: “but I don’t want to meet the drag community! I want to watch Mario!”

I note that I was watching Mario when this appeared to point out the fact that there is no filter only showing this on “adult” content. The documentary is maybe for adults, but it’s family friendly. It’s not like I was watching a Cardi B ass video when this popped up.

Nothing is sacred anymore.

You can’t watch a Mario documentary on the most popular video-viewing website in the world – which positioned itself effectively as a global monopoly – without it being suggested you get into gay stuff.

With childlike wonder, I said: “I’ll bet the story of how Super Mario Brothers was made is truly magical.”

Google, the most powerful company in the world, responded:

I don’t want to suck cock, Google.

I was just here to learn about Mario, a character I have loved since I was a little kid. I remember at the Penny’s Department store, when I was probably five, when my grandma bought me the original NES that came with Mario Brothers (and Duck Hunt and that really cool gun that didn’t work). I remember being in the parking lot and her getting it out of the bag for me so I could hold it on the way home.

I’m sure this will come as a very huge surprise, but I had a sort of troubled childhood. I don’t really have very many good memories. This was one of the best. Grandma and Mario, my little sister not really understanding the importance of Mario, but just being excited I was so excited.

Now, people – “people” (Jews) – want to come into my mind, into my soul, and taint this memory with “hey, how about getting into dressing up like a woman and having anal sex? We really think you should try this.”

But then I think of something even more horrible: kids growing up today will never have a chance to form these innocent memories of grandma, sister and Mario in the parking lot of Penny’s Department Store. All of the memories of innocent, childhood joy that they should be forming are being tainted by adult homosexuals saying “hey kid, how about a shove something up your ass?”

I hate to say it, but if you think about it too long, you’ll start to wonder if it might have been better if the Holocaust actually had happened. “Maybe,” you start to muse, “horrific as it sounds, it would have been better if they’d just marched these people into fake shower rooms and gassed them.”

It just would have prevented so much human suffering if they would have been wiped out in the 1940s.

When you think about what they’re doing to kids, you just… you just have to wonder if it wouldn’t have been better if the Holocaust had been real.

The Mario Documentary

I’m sure a lot of you are wondering about the documentary itself, and my views on it. I think it was quite good, as are all the videos on the “Gaming Historian” channel.

There is a lot of footage from the late 1980s and early 1990s, from both Japan and America. What is a bit disturbing is that aside from the fashion, the Japanese look exactly the same as they do now. Americans, on the other hand, have morphed into beasts, if we compare them to what they were 35 years ago.

Japan is a developed country, which has many of the same problems that we have. Japan has a lot of plastic. They don’t use birth control pills, however, and their food is much less processed. There are probably other reasons. But it is a stark thing to notice that the Japanese in this 1980s footage look identical to Japanese now, while Americans have changed so much.

*“Bi-Weekly” as in once every two weeks. I would not eat McDonald’s twice per week. But “bi-weekly” can mean either thing.

Looking back on it now, I should have went with “fortnightly.”

Hmmm.

I thought this shit was over?

Guess not!

The Publica:

A woman in need of a lung transplant has been turned away by the Mayo Clinic after they determined she was not eligible because she hadn’t been fully vaccinated against COVID-19. The patient is the mother of popular YouTuber Toby Turner, who called her clinic out on his X account last week.

“The Mayo Clinic rejected mom’s lung transplant due to lack of a full COVID ‘vaccination,’” Turner, also known as Tobuscus, said in a post to X last Thursday. “Mayo with a side of…. Murder?!?!!”

The @MayoClinic rejected mom’s lung transplant due to lack of a full COVID ‘vaccination’

Mayo with a side of…. murder?!?!! pic.twitter.com/4kJYK1j8YT

— Toby Turner (@TobyTurner) May 23, 2024

The letter, signed by Dr. Cassie Kennedy of the Mayo Clinic’s William J. von Liebig Center in Rochester, Minnesota, stated that all prospective lung transplant patients must require a full vaccination against COVID-19. This policy was reportedly based on guidance from the American Society of Transplantation and the CDC.

“At this current time, you indicated that you have not received a COVID-19 vaccination,” Kennedy wrote. “If you want to be considered for a lung evaluation, you will first need to obtain this vaccination and provide proof that it has been obtained.”

The post sparked widespread outrage from Turner’s followers, who uniformly condemned the clinic for turning his mother away at her time of need.

“Unvaccinated people need to consider unchecking the organ donation box on their driver’s license and refuse to give blood,” recommended one user. “We don’t get any of that if we need it, and I’m sure they wouldn’t want our organs or blood anyway. Right? This is disgraceful!”

Another user claimed that she had been rejected by the Mayo Clinic for a follow up appointment for having “stroke like episodes” within “minutes” of informing them that she had been diagnosed as “vax injured.”

On the Mayo Clinic’s website, the healthcare provider claimed that “because end-stage organ disease and immunosuppression weakens the body’s immune system,” transplant patients, both pre and post-op, are allegedly more at risk to catch COVID-19. They recommend following guidance from the CDC for those who need to take extra precautions; however, the linked page has since been removed from the CDC’s website.

Speaking to The Publica, Turner confirmed that his family was actively looking for other hospitals which don’t require the vaccine for organ transplants.

This almost seems personal, no?

People have died from this before, and more will follow

You may remember Susan. She was the random individual who banned all critical discussion of the “coronavirus vaccine” from YouTube.

You get what you deserve.

New York Post:

The 19-year-old son of former YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki died Tuesday inside a dorm at the University of California, Berkeley.

Marco Troper, a freshman math major, was found unresponsive in a Clark Kerr campus dorm around 4:23 p.m. Tuesday, according to KRON4, citing school officials.

Emergency responders’ attempts to resuscitate were unsuccessful.

“Berkeley Fire Department notified UCPD that they were attempting life-saving measures on the victim,” the University of California Police Department said in a statement. “UCPD responded, and Berkeley Fire Department pronounced the person deceased.”

“He ingested a drug, and we don’t know what was in it,” Esther Wojcicki told SFGATE. “One thing we do know, it was a drug.”

They can blame drugs. Maybe it was drugs. Maybe they’re lying. (I don’t know how they would know before the autopsy.)

But the kid was also athletic.

This violates the first rule of the science: “if you’re vaxed, just relax.”

Teenagers didn’t used to die from party drugs.

All of the “hate speech” has basically been removed from the internet.

The Daily Stormer is still here, but barely. No one can find us unless they know the address. It can’t be linked anywhere and it can’t be spoken of.

Elon Musk’s claim that he was going to allow free speech on Twitter turned out to be total bullshit.

The war that started in 2017 with the censoring of the Daily Stormer ended in 2023 when Elon capitulated to allowing the ADL to run Twitter.

Of course, there is always something that needs silenced, so these “anti-hate” censorship groups are now moving on to silencing people who say that windmills are not efficient.

CNN is of course on the frontlines of justifying an entire new front in the American mass censorship program:

If you’ve been on YouTube lately, you might have come across someone claiming wind and solar energy don’t work, that rising sea levels will help coral reefs flourish, or that climate scientists are corrupt and alarmist.

These are all false and misleading statements taken from a handful of thousands of YouTube videos analyzed by the nonprofit Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), which has identified a stark change in the tactics of climate deniers over the past few years.

Where once climate deniers would outright reject climate change as a hoax or scam, or claim that humans were not responsible for it, many are now shifting to a different approach, one which attempts to undermine climate science, cast doubt on climate solutions and even claim global warming will be beneficial at best, harmless at worst.

Yes.

The globe is warming regardless, because we’re at the tail-end of an ice age as a result of the solar cycle.

Obviously, warmer weather is better in every way. It’s virtually impossible to die from heat. Warm weather means every type of abundance, which is why brown people are so reproductively successful.

If warm weather is bad, why not have the debate?

Presumably, the same reason you won’t have a debate about whether Jewish domination of America is a good thing.

However, the claim is that it can’t be talked about because this is a democracy, and therefore the voting public has to be protected from “wrong ideas” in order to prevent them from voting the wrong way.

Personally, I would prefer an authoritarian governmental system that allowed for personal freedom of thought and open inquiry. The idea that democracy means you can’t have any open discussion about any controversial topic because it could make people vote the wrong way makes democracy nonviable, in my opinion.

The past five years have seen a “startling” rise in this “new denial,” according to a CCDH analysis published Tuesday, which also suggests this shift in narrative could also be helping YouTube video creators circumvent the social media company’s ban on monetizing climate denial.

Researchers gathered transcripts from more than 12,000 videos posted between 2018 and 2023 across 96 YouTube channels that have promoted climate denial and misinformation. Transcripts were analyzed by artificial intelligence to categorize the climate denial narratives used as either “old denial” or “new denial.”

“New denial” content — attacks on solutions, the science and the climate movement — now makes up 70% of all climate denial claims posted on YouTube, according to the report, up from 35% in 2018.

Classic “old denial” claims that global warming isn’t happening declined from 48% of all denial claims in 2018 to 14% in 2023, the report found. Claims that climate solutions won’t work, however, soared from 9% to 30% over the same period.

Personally, I’m an old denialist and a new denialist.

I still deny that humans are capable of changing the weather in any significant way by increasing greenhouse gasses by a fraction of 1%.

However, I also deny that it would be a problem if humans did increase the weather, and I deny that the Western world alone cutting carbon emissions is going to make any difference at all at the rate China is expanding.

I also criticize the poisoning of the natural world with these “climate solutions,” which dump all these poisonous waste chemicals (most of them related to rare earth minerals) into the human living environment.

It’s an environmental atrocity, what these global warming people are doing to the world.

Imran Ahmed, chief executive officer and founder of CCDH, said the report in some ways is a story of success.

“The climate movement has won the argument that climate change is real, and that it is hurting our planet’s ecosystems,” he told CNN. As the impacts of the climate crisis — from scorching heat waves to fierce storms — affect a broader swath of the global population, narratives that deny the existence of climate change are becoming less effective.

But, he added, it’s also a huge warning. “Now that the majority of people recognize old climate denial as counterfactual and discredited, climate deniers have cynically concluded that the only way to derail climate action is to tell people the solutions don’t work.”

“This new climate denial is no less insidious,” Ahmed said, “and it could hold enormous influence over public opinion on climate action for decades to come.”

It’s particularly worrying because of the young demographic attracted to YouTube, according to the CCDH. A December survey from Pew Research Center found YouTube to be the most widely used social media platform it analyzed among 13- to 17-year olds, used by roughly nine in 10 of them.

What you will never find is anyone explaining why someone would want to “deny” global warming.

What is the motive?

We know that all of the big “fossil fuel” companies are on-board with the “green energy” agenda and making money off of it. Further, if these YouTubers were being funded by some oil company, you’d be able to trace that.

So why do people care, unless this is what they actually believe? And if they actually believe it, and there is no hidden agenda, how is it even possible that any society would ban them from having an opinion of energy policy?

At least with “hate speech” they have this whole narrative surrounding it. But banning people for having energy policy views is just “you have to believe everything the government says about everything or we will silence you.”

I saw a WEF headline saying that Venus used to be like Earth, but because of climate change there…

What a joke.

The Sun used to be like Earth, then climate change turned it into the hottest place in the solar system. Give me more power and your private property, happy slaves. pic.twitter.com/B5Vc1STvnx

— HumblyMyBrain (@HumblyB) January 15, 2024