Andrew Yang was hinting that he’d do something big in the days leading up to the debate.

What could #YangsDebateSurprise be? You'll have to wait and see! #DemDebate #TonightAt8 #YangGang pic.twitter.com/Z3n3PjfLBZ

— Andrew Yang (@AndrewYang) September 12, 2019

Many people were speculating that he was going to offer people free money.

These people turned out to be on point because that’s exactly what Yang did. When it was his turn to speak at the Democratic debates, he got right to the point.

This is what he said:

In America today, everything revolves around the almighty dollar. Our schools, our hospitals, our media, even our government. It’s why we don’t trust our institutions anymore. We have to get our country working for us again instead of the other way around. We have to see ourselves as the owners and shareholders of this democracy, rather than inputs into a giant machine. When you donate money to a presidential campaign, what happens? The politician spends the money on TV ads and consultants and you hope it works out. It’s time to trust ourselves more than our politicians. That’s why I’m going to do something unprecedented tonight. My campaign will now give a freedom dividend of $1,000 a month for an entire year to ten American families, someone watching this at home right now. If you believe that you can solve your own problems better than any politician, go to yang2020.com and tell us how $1,000 a month will help you do just that. This is how we will get our country working for us again, the American people.

I don’t know about you guys, but I won’t say no to an extra $1k a month.

That’s why I went ahead and signed myself up.

…and that’s about as far as I got.

Yang’s little avatar kept jumping up and down and doing burpees while I waited for like 2 minutes, but nothing came up after I entered my name, my email, and a zip code.

I assume that the site no longer works because of the huge number of people who signed up to try and get themselves that mf bag. If this is the case, then Yang’s Freedom Dividend already has its proof of concept.

All-time traffic high on https://t.co/nYWdJYpqVC last night. Must have been something I said.

— Andrew Yang (@AndrewYang) September 13, 2019

People just aren’t going to say no to that $1k.

Going forward, it will be interesting to see the demographics of the people who end up getting selected. I wonder if there will be a normal-looking White Millennial couple or not?

If there is, well… that would be nice.

Yang has, unfortunately, openly adopted the anti-White, pro-Globalism talking points that the majority of his party espouses, so he has officially become a trash candidate, like all the rest of them.

But he can still provide proof of concept for the UBI idea.

Maybe, just maybe, a populist with a conservative streak, but who leans left on economic issues can come along in the near future and run on the idea without attacking White people, demanding the borders come down and promising the entire Third World a free lunch.

It would be an undefeatable platform.

If they gave this money to white people, everyone would be better off in the long run and the world would be a better, nicer place.

But they’re giving it to random brown ex-drug addicts so they can have a smartphone.

AP:

Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang wants to give cash to every American each month.

Susie Garza has never heard of Yang. But since February, she’s been getting $500 a month from a nonprofit in Stockton, California, as part of an experiment that offers something unusual in presidential politics: a trial run of a campaign promise, highlighting the benefits and challenges in real time.

Garza can spend the money however she wants. She uses $150 of it to pay for her cellphone and another $100 or so to pay off her dog’s veterinarian bills. She spends the rest on her two grandsons now that she can afford to buy them birthday presents online and let them get the big bag of chips at the 7-Eleven.

“I’ve never been able to do that. I thought it was just the coolest thing,” said Garza, who is unemployed and previously was addicted to drugs, though she said she has been sober for 18 years following a stint in prison. “I like it because I feel more independent, like I’m in charge. I really have something that’s my own.”

Garza is part of an experiment testing the impact of “universal basic income,” an old idea getting new life thanks to the 2020 presidential race, although Stockton’s project is an independent one and has no connection to any presidential race.

Yang, a tech entrepreneur, has anchored his longshot bid with a proposal to give $1,000 in cash to every American, saying the payments will shield workers from the pain of certain job losses caused by automation. The idea has helped him win unexpected support and even muscle out some better-known candidates from the debate stages. His proposal isn’t too far off from one by U.S. Sen. Kamala Harris, one of the top contenders for the Democratic nomination, who has a proposal to give up to $500 a month to working families.

Kamala’s “to working families” thing will quickly turn into “just for blacks and browns as a form of reparations for slavery and colonialism.” She has already stated that she supports “reparations,” so it would be weird to give money to white people.

Yang’s “for everyone” approach is much more likely to result in white people getting money too.

Stockton, once known as the foreclosure capital of the country and for one of the nation’s largest municipal bankruptcies, is a step ahead of both candidates. In February, the city launched the Stockton Economic Empowerment Demonstration, a pilot program spearheaded by a new mayor and financed in part by the nonprofit led by Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes. The city chose 125 people who live in census tracts at or below the city’s median household income of $46,033. They get the money on a debit card on the 15th of each month.

“I think poverty is immoral, I think it is antiquated and I think it shouldn’t exist,” said Michael Tubbs, the city’s 29-year-old Democratic mayor.

Stockton Mayor Michael Tubbs

Tubbs’ personal story includes a cousin who was killed, a father who is in prison and a mother who, as a teenager, raised him with the help of multiple jobs. He found his way to Stanford and public service, where he persuaded his beleaguered city to sign on to a provocative new idea: guaranteed cash.

…

A team of researchers is monitoring the participants. Their chief interest is not finances but happiness. They are using what they call a “mattering scale” to measure how much people feel like they matter to society.

“Do people notice you are there? Those things are correlated to health and well-being,” said Stacia Martin-West, a researcher at the University of Tennessee who is working on the program along with Amy Castro-Baker at the University of Pennsylvania.

Guaranteed cash? That black mayor should know better. If the researchers’ chief interest is happiness and not finances, then they have to step up their game.

It’s all about guaranteed Popeyes chicken sandwiches now.

Sometimes blacks have the money but Popeyes doesn’t have the sandwiches.

If we want to keep the peace and make people of color happy, we must guarantee the availability of these sandwiches and launch the Universal Chicken Sandwiches program to give every person of color 1,000 Popeyes chicken sandwiches a month.

They won’t even need cash after that, they’ll base their economy on chicken sandwich units.

The idea of a guaranteed income dates back to at least the 18th century and has crossed ideological and cultural lines.

…

The latest momentum comes with the help of the technology industry, which is grappling with how to prepare for the job losses likely to come with automation and artificial intelligence.

The tech connection has drawn criticism from left-leaning labor unions skeptical of the industry’s motives.

“We think the future of work should be defined by working people, not tech billionaires,” said Steve Smith, spokesman for the California Labor Federation, a group of 1,200 unions and a reliable ally for some of the state’s most liberal policies. “If there are no jobs available, you are pretty much stuck with your $1,000 a month check while the CEO of the tech company that automated you out of a job is being paid a billion dollars a year.”

Work for the sake of work is not a solution to automation taking away people’s jobs.

America needs to use taxpayer money to buy an army of robot worker slaves to serve Americans.

Companies can automate jobs because they have the money to invest in robot workers. America has the money to do that too.

Use taxpayer money to generate more money for taxpayers. Over time, taxpayers won’t even have to pay taxes and will get richer and richer through the collectively-owned robot slave worker army.

The robots will pay for themselves and dance for us.

Instead of spending hundreds of billions on strengthening the army for Israel, why not take a couple of years off to invest in an army of robot slave workers that will generate wealth for Americans?

Most countries don’t spend this kind of money on their military and they’re just fine, and surely, all the money spent so far can buy you a bit of time to spend on something else.

Say what you will about AOC and the other brown women who are in Congress now, but they’re the only ones with the stones to stand up to powerful kike institutions like Wells Fargo.

Have you ever seen a midwestern gud boi cuck politician grill a megabank like this?

Fox News:

Wells Fargo CEO Tim Sloan fired back at New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez at a contentious hearing in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, after the freshman legislator accused the bank of “financing the caging of children” and suggested it should bear financial liability for everything from oil spills to climate change.

The CEO of Wells Fargo said they chose to finance the unstable Dakota Access Pipeline over Standing Rock Sioux objections, because the bank determined it was “worth the risk.”

To whom?#DAPL has leaked at least 5x. And we, the public, are left to pay for cleanup+destroyed land. https://t.co/ugGY1BeBdO

— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) March 12, 2019

Ocasio-Cortez’s inquiries come as activists increasingly seek to “deplatform” political opponents by cutting off their funding from banks and other financial services providers — a concerted effort that conservatives and libertarians have said threatens free speech.

House Financial Services Committee Chairman Maxine Waters, D-Calif., brought Sloan before the panel Tuesday as part of a broad, four-hour inquiry into widely reported fraudulent misconduct in recent years by Wells Fargo employees. But in questioning Sloan, who faced bipartisan criticism during the hearing, Ocasio-Cortez, a self-described Democratic socialist, quickly went much further.

“Why was the bank involved in the caging of children and financing the caging of children to begin with?” Ocasio-Cortez asked at one point, in an apparent reference to the Trump administration’s zero-tolerance immigration policy, which resulted in increased separations of parents suspected of criminal activity from the minors who accompanied them.

The White House has pointed out that images widely circulated on social media showing migrant children in large, fenced-off detention rooms were taken during the Obama administration.

Sloan responded simply, “I don’t know how to answer that question, because we weren’t.”

Clearly, the whole cuck phenomenon isn’t an IQ or knowledge-based thing.

First Omar takes down Jewish war shills, now AOC is taking down Jew banks.

As you can tell from the lines of questioning they’re using, AOC and her bulbhead friend clearly aren’t the brightest bulbs in the… bulb-shed. But it only took them like a month in Washington, DC to figure out that the Jews run everything with their Benjamins and their AIPACs and their complete strangleholds on both parties.

If these two could figure it out, what’s that say about all the other Boomer cucks that we send to Washington?

You think they don’t know the score?

Furthermore, the truth is that AOC’s platform is very appealing. She’s one of the few ones out there talking about GIVING MILLENNIALS SOME $$$$$$$.

Cost of the GOP Tax Scam for the rich:💰~$1.8-2.3 Trillion

Cost of forgiving all student loans in America:💰~$1.5 Trillion

Clearly where there’s a will, there’s a way.

When people say that there isn’t “enough” to do these things, what they mean is they don’t *want* to do them. https://t.co/RvcYk8kbEy

— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) March 13, 2019

You may argue that she hates White people and that’s true. But she’s the only one out there specifically advocating for Millennials, which is being overlooked.

And how bad is she, really? Like, in context.

Compare her to your standard Boomer politicians – Republican or Democrat, it doesn’t really matter. They all hate Millennials equally and want us to suffer because they’re old and retarded. Most of them don’t particularly like White people either. As a White Millennial, I at least get something resembling less than open contempt out of AOC and her platform. She’s talking about how shit-tier the wages are for interns and entry-level positions and pointing out that it’s time for the boomers and the banks and the big businesses to start sharing the wealth… or else.

Kind of like Yang.

Also, that’s the thing that Yang and AOC have in common: they make Boomers absolutely lose their minds. And I do love seeing those ham-necked boomers throwing sweaty internet tantrums about her and her plans to redistribute their social security to Millennials and brown people (though they won’t ever name the latter, because they’re that big of cowardly welps).

Yang is clearly superior though because he doesn’t hate White people, only orange people.

Ideally, we could have a merger between AOC’s and Yang’s platforms. 

I support a forgiveness plan for a huge chunk of student loans. Young people should be buying homes, starting families and starting businesses and not trapped in their parents’ basement paying off phantom loans for years. It’s a better stimulus than shoveling money to banks. https://t.co/0vdyFAQ0Fh

— Andrew Yang (@AndrewYangVFA) March 14, 2019

1000 bucks a month ONLY for Millennials and Zoomers (once they turn 18).

This would be paid for with a VAT sure, but also supplemented by canceling the Boomers’ social security and redirecting the money to a fund that will be used to pay off young people’s college debts, get them into starter houses and give them some pocket money every month to throw at their favorite Twitch e-Thot.

Because they gotta eat too.