The word “rape” gets thrown around everywhere nowadays. A woman can be “raped without force” by her boyfriend, according to the Weinstein Standard. A 19-year-old having sex with a 16-year-old is “rape.” If a girl gets drunk and decides the next day (or years later) that she “did not consent,” then it’s rape.

It should be remembered that this word used to have a very specific definition.

Daily Mail:

A 14-year-old girl was dragged into bushes and raped while jogging through a busy park in broad daylight.

The teenage girl was exercising when she was grabbed by a man wearing blue tracksuit bottoms and a long, black jacket, police said.

She began her run near the basketball courts in Goodmayes Park in Ilford, east London, on Monday at around 2.40pm when a man aged around 17 to 20 years old attacked her.

Yesterday, police launched an appeal for anyone who may have information to come forward.

Detective Constable Gemma Morris from the Met Police’s East Area Command Unit, said: ‘Goodmayes Park would have been busy at the time of the afternoon and I am appealing to anyone that was in the park and saw the male described to please come forward and provide us with information.

‘No matter how small or insignificant you think your information might be, it could really help our investigation.’

That’s what “rape” used to mean – grabbing a woman and dragging her into the bushes.

Grabbing a woman and dragging her into the bushes is a different act than this stuff with “consent,” and yet the same word is used. This removes weight from the word. The intent is to add weight to the fake thing, but the situation is that the weight gets redistributed, and then it eventually just falls apart.

Whenever I see a headline saying “rape,” I assume it is a hoax. Just so, whenever I see something about “child pornography,” I assume someone got caught with the hot potato of a teenage girl’s bathroom selfies.

This is similar to what happened with “marriage.” We used to define marriage as a legal contract. Then lawyers invented “no-fault divorce,” which meant that it was a contract that could be broken by either party for any reason or no reason (i.e., it was no longer an actual contract). So then they had to come up with the idea of a “prenuptial agreement” to say “okay, this one is an actual legal contract.” Of course, now the prenups are being thrown out by judges, with the logic being: “no really, there is no legal contract that can confine female sexuality.”

So then, why not have “anal marriage”? Who cares? The word doesn’t mean anything.

When you mess with words like this, you mess with the ability to communicate and understand meaning.

Speech has become violence.

Violence has become speech.

The assault on language is an assault on our ability to understand what is happening around us.

The good news, I suppose, is that it works both ways.

The word “racist” apparently is intended to denote some kind of a murderous psychopath who hates people for the color of their skin and wants to kill them. I don’t believe this thing ever existed in the first place, but people understood the word to mean that. Now, that word is being applied to half the country, and effectively just means “heterosexual white person” (given the “Karen” phenomenon, women are no longer excluded from protection here, at least if they’re not absolute freaks).

“Pope” Francis has had enough of people being specific about stuff.

Stuff is just stuff.

Daily Mail:

Pope Francis often uses his homilies to rally against the world’s evils such as greed, violence and hatred.

But this week he lashed out at a rather more peculiar sin – the overuse of adjectives.

In a speech on Monday, the leader of the Catholic Church slammed these describing words and even said: ‘I am allergic to those words’.

He said: ‘We have fallen into the culture of adjectives and adverbs, and we have forgotten the strength of nouns.

‘Why say “authentically Christian”? It is “Christian”! The mere fact of the noun “Christian”, “I am Christ” is strong: it is an adjective noun, yes, but it is a noun.

Sounds good, right? It’s actually evil though.

Why say “biologically female”? A woman’s just a woman! Everyone’s equal! Everything’s the same!

‘The communicator must make people understand the weight of the reality of nouns that reflect the reality of people.

‘And this is a mission of communication – to communicate with reality, without sweetening with adjectives or adverbs.’

…

And he later tweeted: ‘Let us learn to call people by their name, as the Lord does with us, and to give up using adjectives.’

By which name though? The name their parents gave them or their drag queen name?

What about pronouns? Is Francis asking people to stop using the right pronouns? That would be mean.

Words matter. What Francis proposes, combined with the current trend of taking seriously whatever people claim to be, would distort reality even further.

Right now, it’s common to read and hear about “trans-women” and “trans-men.” Referring to those as just “women” and “men” advances the overlord’s agenda of blurring the lines between the sexes.

“Black people” would be just “people.” Crime statistics would talk about people in general. There’d be no demographics, only people. There’d be no white genocide because white people wouldn’t really be a thing.

Everyone and everything would be the same.

“American”

No such thing as an American, no such thing as countries. No such thing as nations.

Only one people.

Only one government.

Only one planet!

Banning the word is nice, but I’d much rather they ban trannies themselves tbh.

The purpose of the Center for Disease Control is to prevent and control outbreaks of dangerous diseases, such as cholera and AIDS. So it only makes sense that they would implement measures to control the most virulent disease of them all: liberalism.

Banning words such as “diversity,” “transgender” or “vulnerable” is a good preventive measure, considering that words shape the way we think, but I definitely think they should take a more active approach

One small step would be to mandate the use of the word “tranny” instead of transgender, for example.

A more robust approach would be to simply exterminate trannies and be done with the whole thing.

Oh, well, one small step at a time, I suppose.

CNN:

Officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the very agency tasked with saving and protecting the lives of the most vulnerable, are now under order by the Trump administration to stop using words including “vulnerable” in 2018 budget documents, according to The Washington Post.

In a 90-minute briefing on Thursday, policy analysts at the nation’s leading public health institute were presented with the menu of seven banned words, an analyst told the paper. On the list: “diversity,” “fetus,” “transgender,” “vulnerable,” “entitlement,” “science-based” and “evidence-based.”

Taste the liberal butt-hurt.

“Vulnerable” is a good one to take out. As in, “homosexuals are vulnerable to HIV infection.” We need to replace that with “homos are disease vectors, and thus a public safety risk.”

Obviously, “diversity” should definitely be banned from government use. I suggest “brown-ness” or “barbarism” as suitable alternatives.

Alternative word choices reportedly were presented in some cases. For instance, in lieu of “evidence-based” or “science-based,” an analyst might say, “CDC bases its recommendations on science in consideration with community standards and wishes,” the source said. But those working on the Zika virus’s effect on developing fetuses may be at a loss for appropriate — or acceptable — words.

I have no idea what “evidence-based” and “science-based” are all about, in terms of politics. But it’s probably a good way to troll the shit-lib scientists who are using pseudo-scientific methods to justify giving more money to brown people.

The reaction in the room was “incredulous,” the longtime CDC analyst told the Post. “It was very much, ‘Are you serious? Are you kidding?'”

We’re serious – but also trolling you.

As news of the word ban spreads at the CDC, the analyst expects growing backlash.

“Our subject matter experts will not lay down quietly,” the unnamed source said. “This hasn’t trickled down to them yet.”

Good! The more backlash, the better!

These people failed for decades to get the homo-plague under control, so they can’t be very competent. The CDC obviously needs new blood and innovative ideas – which only the American nationalist movement can provide.

For example, declaring third-world people “disease transmission vectors” and containing them in quarantine zones, preferably in the middle of the ocean. That would definitely bring down the infection rates – not to mention, our healthcare fees.

Here’s another freebie: decontaminate gay bathhouses, known STD breeding grounds, with specialized equipment (flamethrowers).

There’s no shortage of lateral-thinking that could be applied to these problems. We just need the right people in place.

srsly where did my meanings of words go.

Now that homo “marriage” is the law of the land in the Jewnited States, the words “husband” and “wife” are under attack by Democraps.

Two dozen Democraps proposed a law that would eliminate all mentions of “husband” and “wife” from federal law.

You see, “husband” and “wife” are “gendered terms,” and we can’t have those because equality. So these Democraps want “gender-neutral terms” like “spouse” or “married couple” to replace the “gendered terms.”

Washington Examiner:

“The Amend the Code for Marriage Equality Act recognizes that the words in our laws have meaning and can continue to reflect prejudice and discrimination even when rendered null by our highest courts,” [Rep. Lois] Capps said. “Our values as a country are reflected in our laws. I authored this bill because it is imperative that our federal code reflect the equality of all marriages.”

The Supreme Court ruled in June that the 14th Amendment to the Constitution means all states have to license same-sex marriages, a ruling that effectively ended the same-sex marriage debate in America. Capps said her bill was aimed at taking the next step, which is to ensure the United States Code “reflects the equality of all marriages.”

Capps ostensibly assumes that Hillary Clinton will become the Jewnited States’ 45th President, which would make Bill the “First Spouse,” so her bill also aims to reflect that likelihood:

She said her bill would also have other benefits if it became law. In one example, she noted that U.S. law says it’s illegal to threaten the president’s wife, but says nothing about the president’s husband.

“Capps’ bill would update the code to make it illegal to threaten the president’s spouse,” her office said.

• Seattle workers given list of alternative terms to avoid offending anyone
• ‘Sack lunch’ to be used because of historic test to determine skin color
• Political correctness has also led to bar on ‘penmanship’ and ‘freshman’

Read more

derogatory [dɪˈrɒgətərɪ -trɪ]

adj

tending or intended to detract, disparage, or belittle; intentionally offensive

As we all know by now, the Jews control the narrative.  It doesn’t matter how far they stray from reality, most people will follow right along blindly with this twisted version of things (I refer to this alternative reality as the “Jewtrix”).  They have the “Goyim” convinced that bad is good, wrong is right, Jews are always innocent, and anyone who dares to speak about them or against their -genocidal- agenda is an “antisemitic hater from hell.”  It only makes sense for them to deceive everyone on such an extreme level, since if the truth of what they are doing were to be known by the average man, they would be given no quarter.  Therefore deceit is second nature to them, as it is a means of their survival at this point (they have pushed too far to turn back now).  Censorship is a Jewish necessity as well, as they are desperate to keep that “antisemitic” truth contained to but a small percentage of the -slave- population.  I could go on, but a basic outline is all that is required to lead into the main point of this piece.

Most of the arguments we use to expose the Jews rely on “common sense” points, supported by well documented facts, where the overall agenda can be derived/decoded from some simple deductive logic.  Their angles are obvious, their agenda is clear, and their distorted tales are so far-fetched that one is left only to scratch his own head in bewilderment as to why it took him so long to wake up to it all.

Case in point: the subtle hypocrisies they try to slip by us every single day. It’s all right there in our face, but they have rewritten history in such a way as to “justify” the double standards and blatant anti-White racism that permeates mainstream culture and the politically correct dogma of the day.  These words might seem meaningless to you.  You might even suggest that I am being “petty” for taking notice of them at all.  However, the intent is clear and these Jews know exactly what they are doing.

It started off as a “joke”. Haha, hehe, “White men can’t jump,” nor can we satisfy a woman or fight (etc).  Basically we are never represented in the media as being manly men.  Quite the opposite in fact.  And even when we destroy their fabricated stereotypes, they simply conceal it from the public eye.  Case in point: do you ever hear of THE most dominant heavy weight boxers in the history of the sport?  Of course not, despite the fact that this reign of dominance by the Klitchko Brothers is still ongoing.  Does that seem like a “petty point” to you?  Well, all one has to ask himself is “what if they were Black?” to know that the Jew media would have them all over the TV and big-screen and that the name “Klitchko” itself would be synonymous with “bad ass” (like “Tyson” or “Ali”).  Why?  Because it fits into their agenda of promoting and empowering non-Whites, while ridiculing and belittling Whites in any way they can.

You’ll hear the Charles Barkley’s of the world joking all the time about “White BOYS” being “poor athletes,” but if a White man called a Black man a “BOY” or suggested that Blacks were inferior when it comes to ANYTHING, then the Jew media would pounce (he’d be fired and apologizing like the little coward that the Jews have made him out to be).  As a matter of fact, a White guy can’t talk about racial differences at all, unless he is putting down his own race or singing the praises of Blacks for being “athletic gods” or Jews for being “intellectual giants.” But I digress.  I really could go on and on with one example after the other, but I am sure you all recognize this type of hypocrisy each time you witness it unfold.  If you haven’t yet, then open your eyes – it’s all around you.

So onto the main point of this article: what does or does not qualify as being derogatory language in this Jew-controlled society?

A simple answer to that question is that it all depends on which side of the Jewish agenda it falls on.  As a recent article on CNN pointed out, the only 3 words that should never be spoken are “Nigger,” “Cunt” and “Faggot” (according to them, all other curse words are “common” now, since we have been desensitized to them from their repeated use in the mainstream media). That pretty much covers all three of their primary bases.  For what’s more important to them than destroying our families, feminizing our men, and empowering their non-White WMD’s against us?  Thus, whether or not an adjective positively or negatively defines a White heterosexual male will determine whether or not society defines it as being “derogatory” in nature.

Now, as you all certainly know (thanks to Wolf Blitzer, along with a host of other Jewish and Black media “experts”) “‘cracker’ is not a derogatory word.”  I’m not sure how it fails to fit the above definition of the word (“intended to detract, disparage, or belittle; intentionally offensive”), but somehow they have convinced the sheeple that it is “not derogatory/offensive.”  No matter how offensive the person who angrily spits it out through his teeth intended for it to be (just before he and his ten “youthful” friends beat the consciousness out of you … at which point they proceed to beat on your lifeless body), “cracker” is not the same as “nigger,” due to some false history the Jews have taught us and some BS about “Blacks being incapable of racism since they have no power.”  Well, Whites don’t have the power either, and in fact those who do have the power wield it openly and aggressively against us (they don’t even bother hiding it these days).  A group of 10 “youths” (oftentimes being 6’4 seasoned fighters) certainly has the power over one unarmed White man, or, as is often the case, one White woman.  Who would argue otherwise, other than a Black thug or a Jew?

And now these bastards not only continue to conceal the epidemic of Black on White violence, but they want to disarm us as well.

Fact is, most Whites will not even quote someone who used the dreaded “n-word” (you don’t hear Blacks tip-toeing around quoting the “c-word”), so they are certainly not going around calling Black people niggers openly (no, not even behind closed doors).  Yet “cracker,” “honkey,” “White trash,” “trailer trash,” “hillbilly,” “redneck,” “peckerwood” and an assortment of other race-based terms are spoken in jest or in anger without so much as a peep from the PC police.  And I know, sometimes we refer to ourselves as being “rednecks,” but the same can be said about Blacks and the word “nigger.”  We mean it one way, whereas they are clearly using it in a derogatory fashion in an attempt to belittle us.  The intent is what counts, and if it is intended to be “disparaging, belittling or intentionally offensive,” then it is in fact a derogatory term.  Who could -reasonably- argue to the contrary?

Blacks (and non-Whites in general) have been given a free pass by the Jews to belittle the White man at any and every opportunity.  Their racist hypocrisy knows no bounds.  I mean, they still portray us as being the “racists,” as they call us every truly racist name in the book (one might say: “that peckerwood-hillbilly-redneck-cracker is such a racist”).  How obvious must they make their hypocrisies before the White masses wake up to them?  Once more, the Jews have created a hostile environment towards Whites (specifically White males), in a very subtle manner, over the last few decades.

What is socially acceptable in the mainstream today, George Jefferson couldn’t have gotten away with in the 1970’s (though he certainly pushed the envelope, at the behest of his Jew writers and directors, quite far at the time).  So now, here we are at a point where teenagers and 20 somethings do not even bat an eye when they are called “cracker” or any of the derogatory terms meant to belittle them, which are freely spoken by comedians, athletes, actors, anchormen, “historians,” or their classmates.  You see examples of this every single day.  Not just on the news, but in cartoons, movies, textbooks, and the mindless entertainment on TV.  More often than not they interject their (anti-White) propaganda disguised as comedy, or simply a passing comment, that to the layman holds no real meaning.  It is repeated so often that people just accept not only the double-standards, but they accept these insults as being factual (a foregone conclusion, once all of the derogatory terms are accepted by the White masses).  They view themselves and other Whites as being all that the Jew media tells them they are.

Just one of countless examples: I was channel surfing last night (yes, I still watch some TV, just to see how far the Jews are taking their propaganda these days), and I came across another “reality” TV show (“Storage Wars,” of all things).  There is no real political angle in the show, it’s just a bunch of Jews buying old storage bins, but I happened to stop there as the Jew Barry Weiss shouted out “KRAUT” to the German guy who just outbid him.  I know, it seems subtle.  And this is far from being the most blatant example of their hypocrisy, but it was the most recent.  Hardly worth mentioning at all, right?  But that only underlines my point.  It is open-season on Whites.  They can openly ridicule us, based on our race, yet we are not even allowed to speak along racial lines at all, let alone call someone a derogatory name based on their race.  The true litmus test is to simply reverse the roles and ask yourself “what would have happened if this German guy were to have called out to Barry Weiss ‘KIKE,'” in ANY context, joking or not?  I think you all know the answer.

Now, we could/should get mad at all of the hypocrites we encounter along the way: the thugs in the street, the newscaster who is pushing the narrative, the actors in the movies, or even our hypocritical non-White “friends”; but the main thing we need to take away from this is that the Jews are deliberately driving societal norms towards creating an environment where, not only does everyone openly hate White people, but where White people hate themselves just as much.  These subconscious messages are having a very damaging effect on our collective psyche, just as they were intended to.  And it is all a means to an end for our racial adversaries: OUR end.  For, if they did not beat us down into submission on this subconscious level, they could have never convinced us to support government policies against us, to submit to the mass murdering thugs they brought into our neighborhoods, or to sit back and do nothing as they rape our women, poison our children, and push us that much closer to crossing the demographic threshold from which there shall be no return.

We are now who they told us we were.  They have defined our race and our culture, and they have rewritten our past.  Our self-identity is now based on the false “history” they teach us, the lies about “everyone being the same” (unless they are pointing out how inferior we are), the power we are said to have (if you still think Whites are in charge, then you truly are blind), and the subtle words they slip into every conversation, newscast, “reality” TV show, textbook, movie and comedy skit.

Words are in fact a weapon, and they have been used against us so effectively that most of us don’t even realize it. In fact, we laugh right along with them, when the joke is and always has been on us.