Noble hero Roy Moore, riding to White America’s rescue!

Roy Moore has been rustling those leftist Jimmies like no one since Glorious Leader himself, and it just gets better and better every day!

CNN politics:

Alabama Republican Senate nominee Roy Moore appeared on a conspiracy-driven radio show twice in 2011, where he told the hosts in an interview that getting rid of constitutional amendments after the Tenth Amendment would ‘eliminate many problems’ in the way the US government is structured.

Damn right it would! If you eliminated every amendment after the tenth, not only would it end this nonsense of having US senators elected by voters, instead of chosen by state legislatures, as seems to be the main thrust of this article, you would also eliminate the right of women and non-White males to vote, and return the Negro to his proper constitutional designation as three-fifths human!

The host agreed with Moore, before turning his attention to the 14th Amendment, which was passed during the Reconstruction period following the Civil War and guaranteed citizenship and equal rights and protection to former slaves and has been used in landmark Supreme Court cases such as Brown v. Board of Education and Obergefell v. Hodges.

“People also don’t understand, and being from the South I bet you get it, the 14th Amendment was only approved at the point of the gun,” the host said.

“Yeah, it had very serious problems with its approval by the states,” Moore replied.

That’s right folks, the feds had to literally put guns to the heads of our representatives to get them to act like Blacks should be considered equals, even after the Civil War.

Alabama’s special election for Senate, in which Moore is facing Democrat Doug Jones, will be held Tuesday. Moore’s controversial views on a variety of subjects — including homosexuality, Islam, and evolution — have come into sharper focus in the final days of the campaign, even as Moore has had to deal with multiple accusations from women who say that he sexually assaulted or pursued relationships with them as teenagers when he was in his 30s. Moore has denied all allegations.

Moore also faced criticism for comments he made in September at a campaign rally. According to the Los Angeles Times, when asked by a black member of the audience when he thought the last time America was great, Moore answered, “I think it was great at the time when families were united — even though we had slavery — they cared for one another. Our families were strong, our country had a direction.”

Now that’s a bold statement! Of course, Moore is 1488% correct in this assertion. America was great then, for many reasons. Prominent among them is the fact that family was important and niggers were neither free, nor considered equal to us in any respect.

It is just this sort of unabashed honesty that has set the establishment hacks of both parties against Roy Moore.

But wait, there’s more!

Moore invoked Adolf Hitler in a discussion about Obama’s birth certificate.

“Now let me ask you a question. You think that Barry Soetoro — oh I’m sorry, Barack Obama — you think you could get the security clearance that you got,” a host asked.

“Well, I don’t know about that. I don’t know. I haven’t, I haven’t explored that. But my personal opinion. My personal opinion –,” Moore responded.

“I think his dog could get a security clearance easier, the dog’s got papers,” the host interjected.

“I know what you mean Jack,” Moore said.

The host then said that when he was in the military, Obama’s documentation would not suffice to get him on a submarine.

Moore responded, “Well that’s, that’s a problem. You know Hitler once said, ‘you tell a big enough lie long enough, people to believe it.’ And that’s that’s the problem. We’ve got to look at simple facts of the case, and we need to recognize we need a new administration in Washington. And it just doesn’t, based upon party, we need like people that uphold the Constitution not undermine it.”

That’s right, in a discussion of our former African dictator, Moore used Hitler’s “big lie” quote, and actually used it correctly, rather than claiming it meant Hitler was admitting to be a big liar all the time, as our politicians and (((media))) always do.

No more faggot cakes!

No more faggot marriage!

No more women and niggers voting!

No more misquoting Hitler!

If you support this platform, then you must support Roy Moore!

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
May 31, 2016

Good job, women-lovers! You really helped by letting women vote! You’re so tolerant and progressive!

The negative response to Black Pigeon’s anti-feminist videos (here and here) among the Alt-Right has been somewhat shocking. It has involved purely emotional arguments and shameful SJW rhetoric.

The number one group to suffer from feminism is without doubt White men. Feminists harass and attack boys, deform their minds, force a perverted ideology and value system upon them. They shame and hurt men. They refuse to produce and care for children. They leave men isolated and alienated, painted as the number one enemy of society.

However, the number two victim of feminism is White women. As such, it is shocking to see White men shilling for feminism, claiming that they do so to fight against “woman haters” who acknowledge he objective reality that women are biologically unfit for political participation.

In doing so, they are betraying their own females in order to feel good about themselves.

The One Time Jews were Right?

Feminism is part of the Jewish agenda. This is not a debatable point, it is simply an established fact. All of the major feminist figures, from Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem to Lena Dunham and Eve Ensler, were Jews.

And they promote it with vicious aggression. It isn’t peripheral, but a main aspect of their overall agenda.

If we are opposed to the Jewish agenda, how are we going to look at the political empowerment of women and say “yeah, this is the one place where they were right”?

Basic Math

The recent Austrian elections proved – through very, very basic math – that allowing women to vote is the behavior of a woman-hater.

Women overwhelmingly voted for the invasion. If women were not allowed to vote, Hofer would have won by a landslide.

It is women who are perhaps suffering most from this invasion. They are the ones getting raped the most (little boys are also victimized regularly). They are being murdered more than men. They are much more likely to get robbed on the street.

And yet some men would claim that it is necessary to allow women to facilitate their own mass rape and murder in order to uphold utterly absurd Jewish morality.

What this very basic math shows is that if you support women’s suffrage, you also support the mass rape of our women by Moslems.

Period.

Another great achievement of women’s suffrage – thank Allah we shamed those woman-haters in the Alt-Right into shutting their pathetic mouths! They’re just angry they can’t get laid, the fools!

Allowing women to vote because “they should have rights no matter what and anyone who disagrees just hates women” is equivalent to saying children should be allowed to play with military grade explosives and anyone who disagrees is a child-hater – “sure, the result will be masses of children dying, but we can’t take away the rights of children!”

If someone gives children explosives, knowing they will blow themselves up, because of some weird and nonsensical moral system, who is responsible for the deaths of the children?

The children? Or the adults who gave them the explosives?

Just so, if someone gives women the right to vote, knowing based on easily available statistics that those women will vote to get gang-raped by Moslems, who is responsible for these gang-rapes?

And who then is the hater of women: the one who enables the gang-rapes by allowing women to vote for gang-rapes or the one who prevents the gang-rapes by disallowing women to vote for gang-rapes?

Emotional Gibberish in Place of Logical Arguments

One can see how false the pro-feminist contingent of the white movement is by simply looking at the feminine, emotional nature of their non-arguments.

Pro-feminists in the White movement attempt to claim the moral high-ground through emotional manipulation, painting anti-feminists as losers who hate women because they cannot get laid.

I am perhaps the most prominent anti-feminist in the pri-White movement, and you will not find a woman who claims I’ve been anything other than respectful towards her.

Along with this, I have never met a male feminist who was successful with women. In fact, the opposite is true: beta white knight cucks who shill for feminists tend to be completely incapable of getting laid. If they ever do get a woman, she is simply leeching them for resources while having sex with other men.

What Do Women Want?

Along with enabling women to get themselves gang-raped, male feminists also flagrantly disregard the actual desire of women.

Just as men are attracted to tight butts and big breasts, women are attracted to power and an ability to dominate. This is because that is what protects them and their children.

All human behavior is based on evolutionary biology.

A sensitive guy has a value of absolute zero in the natural world. If ever a sensitive man existed in the natural world, and somehow managed to land a hot babe, he would be immediately attacked and killed and his woman would be taken by a powerful man. And the woman would be happier for it, because she would be better protected by the man who stole her, and given stronger children by him.

The Jews were lying to you when they made all those movies telling you women like this.

Genes which promote feelings-faggotry among men are worth less than nothing.

Pointing to specific exceptions in the female population who do support nationalist politics as proof that women are politically capable is about as valuable as pointing to Thomas Sowell as proof that Black people are intelligent contributors to society. One random individual person doesn’t magically discount statistical trends within populations.

“Men Do It Too”

In the same way that SJW defenders of Black criminals will point to the fact that a minority of Whites also commit violent crime, SJW defenders of feminism will point to the fact that a minority of men support communist governmental policy.

In actual fact, the latter argument is even more ridiculous than the former. Both issues come down to objective statistical realities, but whereas White criminals would exist even if Black criminals didn’t exist, feminized males who support leftist politics are a product of feminist society.

Black Pigeon actually pointed this out in his last video.

The fact that a percentage of men have adopted feminine values and morality does not mean that there is no such thing as masculine morality. Many men, in our current feminist society, were raised by women in a system dominated by women and thus behave according to feminine values.

Feminine values generally relate to protecting and nurturing those viewed as weak. This is a biological reality, based on the hormonally-determined emotional state of the fairer sex.

The Reality of the Situation

In discussing the reality of feminism and women’s rights, we are only discussing an abstraction. We are not actually going to ban women from voting. In order to do that, we would have to have control of society, at which point we will just abolish the concept of democracy in its entirety.

The reason we discuss this is so that people are able to understand the real-life nature of the sexes and their respective social functions. In order to save our society, we are going to need strong, dominant males. And the core of the attack on masculinity has been feminism. Men must personally reject feminism and feminine morality in order to become real men.

As such, #EndWomensSuffrage is a rhetorical exercise, meant to show men the destructive nature of feminism. If I had a White Nationalist friend running for public office, I would not advise him to run on a platform of ending women’s suffrage. This would not be a popular position among women voters, and right now, the reality of the situation is that women do have the vote.

The goal here is for you men reading this to internalize the truth that the Jew concept of feminism has been at the core of the destruction of our society, both by empowering emotional women to dictate social norms according to female morality and by disempowering men, forcing them to adopt female values and become impotent and weak.

We need to bring back men – and we aren’t going to do that by adopting Jewish values and man-shaming men who oppose the diabolical Jew-feminist agenda.

“Revolutionary transformations have largely taken from women their proper tasks. Their eyes were set in directions that were not appropriate for them. The result was a distorted public view of German womanhood that had nothing to do with former ideals. A fundamental change is necessary. At the risk of sounding reactionary and outdated, let me say this clearly: The first, best, and most suitable place for the women is in the family, and her most glorious duty is to give children to her people and nation, children who can continue the line of generations and who guarantee the immortality of the nation. The woman is the teacher of the youth, and therefore the builder of the foundation of the future. If the family is the nation’s source of strength, the woman is its core and center. The best place for the woman to serve her people is in her marriage, in the family, in motherhood.” -Joseph Goebbels