Stunning and brave

Beauty is a way to oppress trannies.

We should finally admit: being a disgusting freak is the real beauty.

The patriarchy has made us believe that beauty is not repulsive.

Fox News:

One of the world’s largest beauty companies, Coty, accused dictionaries of “ageism” and “sexism” in their definitions of beauty in a new campaign highlighting their effort to “undefine beauty.”

Coty, which owns brands such as Covergirl and Kylie Cosmetics, started a petition on Change.org that called for dictionaries to change the “outdated” definition of beauty.

“The criteria in the definition in the major English Dictionaries – or more specifically the examples used to illustrate it, were born in a different time and have not aged well. The implicit ageism and sexism in the current definition are anachronistic,” Coty’s online petition said.

Coty cited two examples used to explain the definition of beauty.

“I was struck by her beauty,” one example read. Another said, “she was considered a great beauty in her youth.”

“This cause to change the definition of beauty acknowledges all those who celebrate and express their own visions of beauty every day, and validates those who have felt excluded by restrictive definitions of beauty,” Coty wrote in their online petition.

The petition has garnered over 1,300 signatures.

How hateful are the goyim? There are millions of goyim, and only 1,300 support the tranny agenda?

This is why even the best of the goyim deserve to die.

Dictionary.com revealed their 2022 word of the year to be “woman” in December.

Coty CEO Sue Nabi wrote in a letter to dictionary publishers that it was time to update their definition.

“Seen through the lens of today’s society and values, the definition of beauty hasn’t aged well. Of course, not all people are impacted by, or feel excluded by these definitions,” Nabi said. “But the implicit ageism and sexism in the examples were born in a different time. We believe it’s time to bridge the gap – time to bring the definition to where society is today. By changing the definition, if more people feel included – feel beautiful – there will be a ripple effect which touches us all.”

“At Coty, we believe that no one can control or dictate what is, or is not, beautiful,” Nabi added.

No one.

Except for ugly tranny freaks.

They are the only ones with a right to decide what is beautiful.

Just a quick update on the total destruction of reality here for you.

The Post Millennial:

Neopronouns have become all the range among the non-binary set, who wish to express not only that they identify as neither male nor female, but that they identify as something separate, special, and apart from that which the rest of the normies can truly understand.

Now, Dictionary.com, which recently declared “woman” the word of the year simply due to the confusion caused by the term now being inclusive of men who identify as women, has added the neo-pronouns sie, ve, xe, ze, and zie to the list that already included he, she, and they.

The word woman is defined as anyone who “identifies as female,” though it’s unclear what “identifying” as a biological sex that one is not actually means.

So special are those in this subset of the LGBTQIA+ group that they have come up with pronouns for themselves that are as unique as DNA, intended for use by those who are referring to these people in the third person. And Dictionary.com has embraced them.

Peter Boghossian posted screenshots of the words, and the definition for “ze,” which reads “the person being discussed or last mentioned (used as a neopronoun in place of the gendered pronouns he and she).

…

It is unclear how a listener would understand that hir was differentiated from her.

The neopronoun “ze” has now been added to https://t.co/OycFiivK63 and https://t.co/HdKQ1diQUN. pic.twitter.com/9BzzKw94UE

— Peter Boghossian (@peterboghossian) December 18, 2022

Colleges and universities go out of their way to embrace this pronoun subset, giving instructions on what to do if you accidentally offend someone who you referred to in the third person, meaning it’s likely that this misreferred to person is not even present. One should “Admit the mistake and correct yourself as soon as you can,” says Penn State.

Spotted at Penn State. Resources on personal pronouns including “ze” pronouns and neopronouns pic.twitter.com/aLJmrQ3ez6

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) September 15, 2022

Wild Woman Writing Club responded that neopronouns are simply another denial of reality in a digital world.

“In the digital age, there is no one ‘the dictionary’, just countless reality-denialism activists working to ‘queer’ the definition of woman & obscure sex via idiotic ‘neo pronouns’ in their tech ‘engagement’ jobs,” she wrote.

In the digital age, there is no one “the dictionary”, just countless reality-denialism activists working to ‘queer’ the definition of woman & obscure sex via idiotic ‘neo pronouns’ in their tech ‘engagement’ jobs.

— Wild Woman Writing Club (@wwwritingclub) December 18, 2022

Preferred pronouns are decidedly for the self-obsessed, who use them to demand that others refer to them in a specific way even when they are not present.

…

Proponents of preferred neopronouns issue endless videos explaining to viewers how to use these pronouns. One TikToker teaches how to use a nearly infinite variety of pronouns, like “shark/sharks,” “flower/flowers,” “that/thats,” and so many, many more.

These are neopronouns- you can take any word you like and turn it into a “preferred pronoun.” We’re expected to respect and affirm all these pronouns pic.twitter.com/84NuvvT5qN

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) September 12, 2022

Woke teachers go out of their way to “affirm” students’ pronouns, and to keep those pronouns secret from parents. Some parents use props, like a doll, to train their children to use parents’ preferred pronouns. Even the US Navy has issued their directives on using preferred pronouns.

It’s all very normal.

It’s also sustainable, completely.

In 100 years from now, this will still be happening, and society will not have collapsed at all. If anything, the surgeries to transform genitals will be more advanced.

No one should even be worried about this in any way.

To answer the most obvious question, yes, I did pick up what was left of the beer and chug it. https://t.co/y6T0AWC1kQ

— Ariel Elias (@Ariel_Comedy) October 9, 2022

Here's the clip pic.twitter.com/soeG3dixP4

— Ariel Elias (@Ariel_Comedy) October 9, 2022

This Jew bitch was whining about how Donald Trump was persecuting the Jews – and she got a beer bottle thrown at her!

Ariel Elias was in a New Jersey club on Saturday, and was telling an audience member who questioned her Jewish agenda about how “you’re attacking me because I’m the only Jew here.”

That’s when the beer can flew! Get our president’s name out your smarmy rat mouth!

This is America! We ride for Donald Trump! We tolerate none of this kikery!

Stupid Jew bitch!

Shut up!

No one wants you here!

Go back to Israel!

Ratface!

We have enough fat, ugly women here, we don’t need fat, ugly Jew women here!

People are praising her for being clever for drinking the beer after it was thrown at her. Actually, that wasn’t clever – it was just a Jew saving money! This was probably her plan all along!

We need Soldiers of Ye, we need to stand together against the Jews.

We need to go Death Con 3 on these evil scoundrels trying to ruin us.

If I’d thrown the beer, I would have yelled: “Fosters is Australian for beer! Put another shrimp on the barbie!”

This article was sponsored by Fosters beer, the official beer of Ye Soldiers. 

Someone has to stop these people from the internet!

The Guardian:

The image captured the raw humanity of the moment: a Red Cross volunteer tenderly consoling a Senegalese man moments after he stepped foot in Spain’s north African enclave of Ceuta.

Hours after the footage went viral, however, Luna Reyes set her social media accounts to private after she was targeted by a torrent of abuse from supporters of Spain’s far-right Vox party and others incensed by the unprecedented arrival of 8,000 migrants in Ceuta.

[#GraciasLuna]Somos una organización en la que hay muchas Lunas,que ayudan a diario a personas como las que llegan a Ceuta.O a Arguineguín.O a Canarias.O que están en tu barrio
En todo el mundo,#EnTodasPartes#Humanidad #Voluntariado #Independencia #Neutralidad
📸@BernatArmangue pic.twitter.com/wMOvJCVtEW

— Cruz Roja Española (@CruzRojaEsp) May 19, 2021

“They saw that my boyfriend was Black, they wouldn’t stop insulting me and saying horrible, racist things to me,” the 20-year-old, who has been volunteering with the Red Cross since March as part of her studies, told the Spanish television channel RTVE.

As news spread of the abuse, the internet began fighting back. Messages hailing the hug soon began pouring in, drowning out the insults and sending the hashtag #GraciasLuna trending in Spain.

That wasn’t the internet fighting back.

It was white women who love black dick meddling with the internet on their cellphones.

Emotiva imagen desde el drama de Ceuta. Una trabajadora de la Cruz Roja se abraza a un exhausto inmigrante pic.twitter.com/aH8JrKYush

— EL MUNDO (@elmundoes) May 18, 2021

The Spanish government also got involved, praising this woman who has sex with black men for hugging a different black man.

“We will not allow hatred to win,” Rita Maestre, a councillor for the city of Madrid, said on Twitter. “Those of us who see this embrace as a symbol of the best of our country outnumber the others.”

Reyes downplayed the gesture, describing the action of hugging someone in need as “the most normal thing in the world”. She hadn’t caught the man’s name but had seen he was battling exhaustion and had given him water.

“He was crying, I held out my hand and he hugged me,” she said. “He clung to me. That embrace was his lifeline.” Days after he arrived in Ceuta she hadn’t seen him again.

As she worried that he might have been among the 5,600 people sent back to Morocco, plaudits rolled in on Twitter from Spanish TV presenters, artists and the highest levels of government.

“#Gracias Luna for representing the best values of our society,” said Spain’s economy minister, Nadia Calviño. “Much more than a photo. A symbol of hope and solidarity,” remarked Spain’s labour minister, Yolanda Díaz.

The best values of Spanish society are sex with the blacks.

Hmm.

Anyway, it’s nice to see that the Spanish are fighting back online.

You never hear about anyone in the English speaking world getting troll stormed anymore, because there is just too much censorship for it to even be possible.

Of course, women in Spain are no doubt moving to make this information lockdown a reality there as well. A response to the information pandemic.

Serious: our society treats information like it is a disease.

I’m pretty sure there was a time when the streets in Germany were actually quite safe.

What changed since then?

Free West Media:

“Every fourth woman has experienced sexual harassment and every fifth has been persecuted, insulted and threatened,” said Maike Röttger, the managing director of the Plan International (PI) children’s aid organisation, who is responsible for the survey.

From January to March, 970 women took part in the survey and provided information on their experiences in public spaces in Hamburg, Berlin, Cologne and Munich. According to this, 54 percent of the survey participants felt the most unsafe when they were on the road. Waiting or using public transport also cause fear (19 percent) and staying in the park (18 percent). Such fears are more intense at night.

The main reason for this is said to be scary people, especially people who have used drugs or alcohol in public. This is reinforced by poorly lit places in cities. The negative experiences of the respondents included sexual advances in the park while jogging or direct immoral, intrusive contact.

Why aren’t they more specific?

Who are these “scary people” and where did they come from?

Guess it’s one of those mysteries that aren’t gonna be solved ever, in the entire history of the world.

What about a solution, does anyone have one?

As a solution, Plan International proposed not only urban development measures to reduce scary places but also a change in role models. “Because sexual harassment, discrimination and violence are social phenomena that are often the result of the outdated notion that girls and women are less worth and the ‘weaker sex’.”

This often suggests to men that they have the right to harass girls and women, to shout out after them or to insult them, the organisation concluded from the answers. But PI did not bother to name the perpetrators of this scourge.

Ah yes, feminist urban planning and pretending that women aren’t the weaker sex.

That’s gonna solve everybody’s problems.

Because if you pretend the average adult woman isn’t at the mercy of every boy above the age of 12, it’s gonna become reality.

Like magic!

Of course it was caused by a woman.

And of course she didn’t face any of the consequences herself.

AP:

Canada’s worst mass shooting erupted from an argument between the gunman and his girlfriend, who survived the attack, police have confirmed.

Royal Canadian Mounted Police Supt. Darren Campbell said the weekend shooting rampage started with an assault by the suspect on his girlfriend and ended with 22 people dead in communities across central and northern Nova Scotia.

“She did manage to escape. That could well have been the catalyst of events,” Campbell said.

Authorities are also not discounting the suspect planned some of the murders.

Campbell said the girlfriend hid overnight in the woods from the suspect, who has been identified as 51-year-old Gabriel Wortman.

Police have said Wortman acted alone in the shooting spree that killed 22 people in more than 16 crime scenes in several rural communities

Campbell said they found 13 deceased victims in the rural community of Portapique, a quiet community of 100 residents where the suspect lived part time. He said when police arrived, they discovered a man shot. The man reported he was driving when someone in what looked like a police car shot him. He survived and was transported to hospital.

They were several homes on fire, including the suspect’s, when police arrived in the community. Campbell said the suspect had a pistol that was acquired in Canada and several long barreled guns that were obtained in the United States. Police found “several people who were deceased, some of which were lying in the roadway.”

Authorities initially thought the suspect might have committed suicide and was in one of the homes that was on fire, he said.

Campbell said at about 6:30 a.m., Wortman’s girlfriend emerged from hiding in the woods, called 911 and gave police detailed information about the suspect including that he was driving a mock police car and was in police uniform.

Police later started receiving 911 calls more than 35 miles away. Campbell said the suspect killed two men and a woman and set their house on fire. He knew at least two of them.

He then approached another residence in that area where he knew people, and knocked on the door. But the people inside did not answer and he left. The occupants called 911 and confirmed the suspect was armed and was driving what looked like a police car.

He then shot a woman on the street and pulled cars over and shot and killed people, Campbell said.

Yes, he was actually pulling people over in his fake police car and then killing them.

This was probably the most extreme killing rampage ever.

Amazingly, there is zero evidence that it was planned, or that he’d ever talked about doing anything like this, or even showed any signs that he was unstable. As I covered in my last article on this event, social media was flooded with people who knew him saying how shocked they were because he was such a normal, nice guy.

This is a case of someone literally just snapping, and the government needs to be held responsible for creating the conditions for making this man snap with their idiotic flu hoax.

Furthermore, the woman should be charged with these deaths for pushing the man over the edge. It is her fault this happened as much as it was the government’s fault.

Things like this are going to keep happening. God invented work so that a man would be able to stay away from women most of the day. With work shut down, men have become prisoners to these women. 24/7, they are forced to look at their dumb faces, sentenced to permanent torture by nagging and complaining. Because if a woman doesn’t have something to do, her immediate go-to behavior is to attack, demean and abuse any man in her vicinity.

All women are by nature abusive, because they are unable to ever be satisfied, and thus they target men, letting out their anger on the people who provide them with everything they have for not providing them with more.

Few men will be able to handle this much longer.

This is what a society that literally says “it’s morally wrong to beat women” has wrought.

Women deserve to be beaten, they deserve to be raped, and if you don’t do it then this is what you get.

Falling bridges are a small price to pay for diversity.

The Guardian:

The University of Technology Sydney is trying to encourage more young women to study engineering, computing and construction degrees by adjusting year 12 entry scores for female applicants.

The university has received approval from the NSW Anti-Discrimination Board to make a 10-point adjustment to the Australian Tertiary Admission Rank of female students applying for those degrees for the 2020 academic year.

The university hopes it will help address gender imbalances in those male-dominated industries.

It never occurred to these people that those “imbalances” are the result of biology, did it?

There has never been one (1) single IQ study ever made that didn’t show that almost all of the smartest people on the planet are men.

As a woman I'm offended! This move reinforces the myth that women as not as smart as men.

— Sophie Baker (@SophiesBaked) August 29, 2019

That’s an easily demonstrable reality, not a myth

But let’s pretend for a second that reality doesn’t exist because professor Shlomo said so in his sociology class and ask the question – so what?

Even if there were as many women as men capable of being engineers, mathematicians or whatever – why the heck would it matter if they actually did it or not?

What would be gained in these professions?

And the answer, of course, is nothing.

Absolutely nothing.

UTS Women in Engineering and IT director Arti Agarwal insisted the move would not lower standards.

“We’re not taking in underperforming students or doing tokenism here,” she told Guardian Australia. “Nobody is getting a free pass … They all have to do all the degree requirements [and] internships.”

Agarwal said the move was part of the university’s 30-year effort to improve gender equity in engineering, which includes primary school and high school outreach programs and mentoring for female engineers.

“We looked at the performance of Atar and the performance of [grade point average] so a lower Atar did not mean they would get a lower GPA.A higher Atar did not mean they were best in the class,” Agarwal said.

She noted a large number of engineering students gained entrance into the undergraduate degree through other pathways, which often were lower than the year 12 Atar minimum score.

What this mongrel bitch is saying is that there were already ways to get in while having a score lower than the minimum… and her conclusion from this is that women specifically should have another way to get in without meeting the minimum requirements.

Does that make any sense to you?

Agarwal said previously that, on average, females received 4-8% of UTS offers to study mechanical engineering/mechatronics. The university expects the score adjustment will increase female study offers to about 20%.

In civil engineering on average 16% of offers are to female students and this could rise to 20%. In computer science 10% of offers are to female students and this could lift to 19%.

According to Engineers Australia, 84% of Australian engineering graduates are men. Female engineers make up 13% of the workforce. Australia faces a looming shortage of engineers.

You’re having a shortage of engineers because these twats aren’t at home having children and raising them, which is what they should be doing, and the only thing upwards of 95% of them are qualified to do.

A 2017 Engineers Australia report found part of the problem was low levels of female high school students were studying the prerequisite subjects. Less than 6% of girls nationally studied physics in year 12, with advanced maths at 6.2%.

Engineers Australia’s professional diversity manager Justine Romanis backed the UTS move.

“We need to be disruptive – what we have been doing to date is just not working,” she said.

…

In 2016, the Australian National University announced that it was broadening its admission processes for engineering degrees away from reliance on Atar scores towards broader selection criteria.

Atar is a number between 0.00 and 99.95 that indicates a student’s position relative to all the students in their age group.

This Justine Romanis bitch didn’t do a day of engineering in her entire life.

Why didn’t you become an engineer, huh?

Why aren’t you out there building stuff, instead of having some pointless makework job which does nothing other than disrupt society?

Why are none of these feminists who demand more women in jobs that they can’t do actually doing those jobs?

Even the ones who get a degree rarely do any actual work in the field, and just start “campaigns” for this retarded shit.

Man I hate women… When the heck are those sexbots ready?

It is 1 am in #NYC
And I can't sleep.

The changes that occurred today in setting سن الرشد the age of adulthood for women and men at 21 is so much more than lifting the travel permission.

It signals full equality in the eye of the law. It signals what modern Sharia is capable of

— Muna AbuSulayman منى (@abusulayman) August 2, 2019

Time to modernize, you stupid camelfuckers

The one thing these dumb sandniggers were doing right is keeping their (hideous) females on a tight leash.

Now, they’re slowly not doing it anymore.

BBC:

Women in Saudi Arabia can now travel abroad without a male guardian’s permission, royal decrees say.

The new rule announced on Friday allows women over the age of 21 to apply for a passport without authorisation, putting them on an equal footing to men.

Women are also being given the right to register births, marriage or divorce.

The average woman is so physically and mentally inferior to the average man, regardless of race, ethnicity or society, that putting them on “an equal footing” with men can’t end in anything other than disaster.

This has been the case literally everywhere this has been tried, without exception.

Why would you let this thing have a say on anything? Are you insane?

The kingdom has recently eased other long-standing social restrictions on women, though campaigners say more remains to be done for women’s rights.

Saudi Arabia has increasingly come under the spotlight over its treatment of its female citizens, an issue highlighted by several high-profile cases of Saudi women seeking asylum abroad.

The de facto leader, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, has sought to relax prohibitions on women, including lifting a driving ban last year, in a bid to open up the conservative kingdom.

Of course more needs to be done, it’s never gonna be enough no matter what you do.

Saudi’s male guardianship system gives husbands, fathers and other male relatives the authority to make critical decisions about women.

Until now, this has meant women there were required to seek those relatives’ permission to obtain or renew a passport and exit the country.

But the royal decrees published in the kingdom’s official weekly Um al-Qura gazette on Friday stipulate that Saudi passports should be issued to any citizen who applies for it, and that anyone over the age of 21 does not need permission to travel.

The changes allow women for the first time to register their children’s births, as well as marriages and divorces.

They also cover employment regulations that expand work opportunities for women. Under the rule, all citizens have the right to work without facing any discrimination based on gender, disability or age.

The Roman Empire had something similar to this called Pater Familias, which basically made the oldest male of a family be the dictator of said family, including having the right to kill them or sell them into slavery.

Gradually, the Pater Familias institution got eroded by law, and many of its parts that were still allowed were not regularly enforced.

The latter happened shortly before…

… but I’m sure that’s just a coincidence.

Despite the latest reforms, other parts of the guardianship system remain in place. These include women requiring permission from a male relative to marry or live on their own, as well as leave prison if they have been detained. They still cannot pass on citizenship to their children, nor can they provide consent for their children to marry.

In a bid to open up the country, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman unveiled a plan in 2016 to transform the economy by 2030, with the aim of increasing women’s participation in the workforce to 30% from 22%.

The article goes on to say that, despite giving more skanks rights, this prince guy is at the same time arresting other, more vocal skanks, and they’re saying the whole thing is basically a mixture of PR and consolidation of power, which is probably true.

And he’s doing it at the expense of his own country.

We call the Saudis dumb sandmonkeys, and they really are, but they’re in much better shape than any White country around.

Their population is exploding (more than doubled in the last 30 years), foreigners who come there almost never get citizenship and are thrown out the minute they’re not needed anymore, they’re very homogeneous (90% sandmonkey, 95% Sunni), and their military spending is the third biggest in the world.

The actually have a law banning all Jews from entry, point blank.

You have to admit, that’s actually pretty impressive for creatures with a mulatto-tier IQ.

Thankfully, they seem to be giving in to (((women’s rights))) for various reasons, so they’re basically fucked, which is a good thing since I hate Moslems.

Now if only we could start solving our own problems…

How much longer do we have to pretend that women aren’t useless for anything other than making babies and sandwiches?

The College Fix:

A 22-year old female University of Utah student reported her business professor to campus administrators for, among other things, assigning too many historical texts written by influential male economists of the past.

“I understand the importance of studying the work of those before us and the importance of context,” wrote the student in a complaint to the university’s bias reporting system, where she labeled the professor’s transgressions “derogatory,” “degrading,” and “intimidating,” thereby causing a “hostile learning environment.”

The report also accused the professor of frequent sexist language, but the bulk of the complaint centered on his assigned readings for the business course.

“I believe it to no longer be necessary when teaching the foundations of our country’s economic system and those who helped build [its] ideals to be presented in conjunction with their sexist beliefs that have already planted their roots within our global and local communities,” the student stated in her complaint, filed in December 2018 and recently obtained by The College Fix through a public records act request.

I predict this bitch is gonna put her degree to good use working as a barista.

In the female student’s bias report, she stated that while her professor “never applauded these philosophers on their sexist beliefs,” he “never outright said they were wrong” and “continued to place them upon a pedestal.”

The report does not cite the scholars assigned in the business course, although typical economists discussed in such a class might include Adam Smith, Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek.

The student continued: “Many of these figures are of great importance. But at what cost do we continue to plant the seed of sexism in the minds of individuals? But especially in a course and college that is already deemed to be a ‘boys club’, continuing those teachings, and those teachings being delivered by a professor of [his] character is dangerous.”

This bitch can barely write a coherent sentence, and she somehow made it to college.

Thank Shlomo for affirmative action.

“As a top university in the nation, I believe we have a duty to lead by example. Pave a new path and right the wrongs of those before us. Some may argue enduring this type of behavior is what needs to be done to play in the ‘big leagues’ of male-dominated fields, such as business. And I can agree to play the game to some degree, but if an opportunity to help change the game presents itself, you take it. [My] professor’s behavior and certain choice of text have greatly affected me both emotionally and academically.”

Sounds like she couldn’t learn shit. Economics is not gender studies (you need to have a minimally functional brain for it), so the first thing that she could think of was blaming Adam Smith.

In all fairness, I’d probably do the same if I were a woman.

She continued that she began to “fear” his sexist banter and said she “also began to fear the readings and I could not even finish one assigned reading due to its clear sexist message.”

According to the complaint, the student was especially disturbed by a conversation that took place on the last day of class about robots taking jobs from working Americans. The professor allegedly claimed that “while all our jobs will be taken by robots,” he will be “retired living in Tahiti surrounded by 40-45 beautiful women feeding him grapes.”

When a student asked why he chose Tahiti, he allegedly responded: “That’s where most of the available women are, at least from what I’ve heard. I also don’t like the competition on the other islands.”

“Not only did Professor willingly and openly objectify women,” complained the female student, “but he also objectified women of color. Women of another culture.”

Imagine that – a university teacher that isn’t a complete soyboy.

In CURRENT YEAR.

This conversation became even more problematic after the professor told the class he became a vegan at age 30 because he couldn’t stomach the idea of killing another sentient being.

Ah… so he’s a soyboy after all.

Must still have some testosterone reserves left in him if he can casually joke about fucking whores in Tahiti in public.

“I sat in my class yesterday, a class I had tried my best to endure and keep my head up as I know myself to be a strong, intelligent, woman entrepreneur,” reported the student. “But I sat there in shock as I had just witnessed a man in a position of power at an educational facility, give more respect to animals that he refers to as sentient beings than women. As though animals are the only sentient beings, and a woman’s purpose is to satisfy his taste buds.”

“I would be lying if I said this experience hasn’t left me with a bad taste in my mouth and utterly exhausted,” wrote the student in her summary. “I’ve debated coming back to the University of Utah next semester largely due to this experience and other personal reasons including finances.”

If this bitch had half a brain, she’d quit trying to act like a man and get married and start a family.

She still has a few years or so of fertility and attractiveness, and she should take advantage of it while she still can.

The article then gives a short list of other complaints students made at this Orwellian institution.

Here’s my favorite of the bunch:

On September 7, a group of four male students were sitting at a table studying. A female student just finishing up a group project noticed the table of male students being “loud and distracting.” At one point, a young man wearing a black shirt and khaki shorts complained that his laptop computer battery was dying. One of the other men at the table offered his charger to the student but he says the charger is incompatible with his laptop. The student offering the charger says it will definitely work if you “just force it.” The student put his hands around his mouth and loudly whispered, “That’s rape. I’m not raping my computer.”

Universities in the Western world today are basically North Korea on crack.

A woman just broke a woman’s athletic record.

CTV:

Montreal fitness enthusiast Dana Glowacka set the world record for the longest plank held by a woman earlier in May – passing the previous record by 50 minutes.

Glowacka held the position for four hours and 20 minutes at the First International Plank Training Conference in Naperville, IL on May 18.

…

Glowacka says her son inspired her to take on this challenge, and she is in the process of getting her record acknowledged by Guinness World Records.

We simply cannot allow this to stand.

One of you needs to train for a couple weeks and call up Guinness World Records and say you identify as a woman.

Seriously, do it.

If you don’t know about planks: The male record is over 10 hours. So if you are in reasonable shape, it will only take you a couple of weeks to get to 5 hours.

I could probably personally beat this record right now.

We must continue to use the tranny phenomenon to prove that women are weak and pathetic.

You don’t have to do anything other than say “I identify as a woman,” and if they question you start saying “ARE YOU ASSUMING MY GENDER SHITLORD???”

But seriously – they won’t question you. People are scared to death of questioning trannies or people who falsely claim to be trannies to humiliate women.

We simply cannot allow women to keep any of these athletic records. It shall not stand.