Was I the only one who saw this movie as a kid then went around biting people for a few weeks?

My son identified as a wolf, and I was fine with it.

Then it turned out he only identified as a wolf because he was confused about being gay.

That’s when I had to drown him in the bathtub.

Daily Express:

A Scottish school pupil has been allowed to identify as a WOLF by education bosses in what is thought to be the first case of ‘species dysphoria’ in the country.

Teachers are said to be supporting the choice of the secondary student.

But the news has been met with shock with one expert saying the pupil involved needs to “snap out of it”.

The Daily Mail reports that official documents confirm the move with a council backing the child’s choice.

It comes amid claims a growing number of youngsters are taking on the persona of animals.

Yeah…

I’m sure that’s so.

It has been reported that children are trying to ‘identify’ as the likes of foxes, dragons, birds, snakes, sharks, and even dinosaurs.

Species dysphoria is defined as a disorder that occurs when someone feels that their body is part of the wrong species.

However, Dunbartonshire-based clinical neuropsychologist Dr Tommy MacKay said there is “no such condition”.

He added: “It’s not surprising we are seeing this in an age when many people want to identify as something other than who they are.

Now we have a council which appears to accept at face value that a child identifies as a wolf, rather than being told to snap out of it, which would be the common sense approach.”

It comes after a school in Aberdeenshire had to deny claims a group of pupils had started identifying as cats and amid a backdrop of fierce debate on gender identity.

The council involved, which has not been disclosed, described the child as being part of a group known as “furries”, who create a persona – sometimes called fursona – based on an animal.

In a statement, the local authority said: “Personal support is available through the wellbeing worker, including counselling. There is very little specific guidance on species dysphoria.”

The statement said bosses follow the GIRFEC [Getting It Right for Every Child – Scottish Government guidance] and Wellbeing Wheel to “support pupils regardless of barriers to learning or challenges they face”. This tool emphasises the need to let children have their voice heard.

I wonder if kids are able to identify as antisemites?

If this is going beyond gender and into animals, can’t it also go into the political spectrum?

I still don’t understand why transracial people got shut down. There is a lot more genetic difference between a white man and a white woman than between a white man and a black man. And if we’re doing animals now, why can’t I be black?

Why can’t I hate Jews?

What kind of nutjob sends his kids to school in Britain?

You know, this is funny. Because I think women’s prisons is exactly where trannies should be. At least when they’re not playing women’s sports.

I just simply do not have any sympathy for women. They created this situation, and now they can sleep in it. Or, they can try to sleep, but they’re probably going to get interrupted by a rape.

Life Site News:

California’s liberal transgender prison policies have led to multiple sexual assaults of female inmates, physical attacks, and widespread “psychological distress” in women’s prisons, according to a lawsuit filed by a feminist legal group.

Women’s Liberation Front (WoLF) on Wednesday sued the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), the department’s secretary, and two wardens, alleging that a recent California law violates the Constitution by forcing women to be housed with male convicts who claim to be transgender, the Daily Signal reported.

The broad who runs this is also an ex-vegan

SB 132, signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom in September 2020, requires the CDCR to “house transgender, gender-nonconforming and intersex (TGI) individuals in a manner that matches their gender identity,” regardless of anatomy.

Biological men do not have to undergo hormones or “sex change” surgeries to transfer to women’s facilities under the law, which forbids the denial of housing requests due to physical characteristics, mental illness, or conviction history. SB 132 also requires inmates and prison employees to use prisoners’ desired pronouns, even if they do not reflect biological reality.

“Any man who does not ‘identify’ as ‘exclusively male’ has the right to be housed with women, many of whom have been traumatized by male violence in their past, and some of whom have been victimized physically or sexually by violence perpetrated by men who claim a ‘transgender’ identity,” WoLF’s complaint says.

The lawsuit, filed with the U.S. District for the Eastern District of California, argues that SB 132 “cannot be applied in any manner that avoids violating the federal and state constitutional rights of Plaintiffs.” WoLF is seeking a permanent injunction and for the law to be declared unconstitutional.

“Hundreds of men have applied for transfers to women’s prisons, and dozens have already been transferred,” the organization said. “These transfers have resulted in intimidation, sexual harassment, physical assaults, and sexual assaults committed by the men against female inmates.”

One plaintiff, inmate Krystal Gonzalez, was sexually assaulted by a biological man transferred to Central California Women’s Facility under SB 132, according to the lawsuit. When Gonzalez filed a complaint and requested to be housed away from men, the prison’s response described her alleged attacker as a “transgender woman” with male genitalia.

The psychological distress caused by Gonzalez’s assault “is exacerbated by the prison’s refusal to acknowledge the sex of her perpetrator,” the filing states.

WoLF said that the CDCR has repeatedly changed women’s requests to halt transfers of male prisoners by replacing the word “men” with “transgender females,” “altering the complaining inmate’s own words, perception, and substance of requested corrective action.”

Gonzalez is one of four inmates included as plaintiffs in the WoLF suit, along with Janine Chandler, Tomiekia Johnson, and Nadia Romero. Woman II Woman, a non-profit formed to advocate for incarcerated women, is also a plaintiff.

‘Rape watch’ in women’s cellsThe introduction of men into California’s women’s prisons has led to “fear, anxiety, depression, and/or post-traumatic stress disorder” among female inmates who have to shower and live with male convicts, the feminist group’s lawsuit claims.

“Some incarcerated women sharing a cell with a man, along with other women, now make sleep schedules among the women so that a woman is on watch to try to prevent rape by the male cellmate,” it adds. Prison staff are likewise “armed with new, stronger pepper spray and riot control measures in anticipation that men are stronger and more violent than women.”

Romero, a Catholic, and Chandler, a Muslim, also alleged religious freedom violations, saying that having to share close quarters with men has hindered their ability to exercise their religions. Romero, a survivor of severe sexual and physical abuse, said she has suffered panic attacks and “self-harm ideation” since being forced to share a housing unit with criminal men.

“Several hundred” males have so far applied for transfers to a female facility under S.B. 132, WoLF said, and CDCR has transferred around 23 to either California Institution for Women or Central California Women’s Facility. Zero transfer requests have been rejected.

According to a 2009 analysis by UC Irvine, one-fifth of transgender inmates are registered sex offenders. More than 40 percent of “transgender women” in major U.S. cities, including 33 percent in Los Angeles, are infected with HIV.

Yeah, okay.

Whatever.

HIV isn’t real, but I’m sure they do have lots of diseases, which they will transfer to all of the women who are locked up with them and getting raped.

I’m really sorry, but I just simply don’t care. Also, I’m not actually sorry.

Trannies are the product of single mothers, they are the product of organized female political organization. If women didn’t want to get raped in prison, they shouldn’t have created this situation.

Donald Trump is an Orange Supremacist. He thinks orange people are superior.

Now, he’s extending his hatred of the non-orange to the animal kingdom.

You notice that he’s not going after the orange wolf – just the gray wolf.

NBC News:

Trump administration officials on Thursday stripped Endangered Species Act protections for gray wolves in most of the U.S., ending longstanding federal safeguards and putting states and tribes in charge of overseeing the predators.

The U.S. Department of Interior announcement just days ahead of the Nov. 3 election could lead to resumption of wolf hunts in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin — a crucial battleground in the campaign between President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden.

It’s the latest in a series of administration actions on the environment that appeal to key blocs of rural voters in the race’s final days, including steps to allow more mining in Minnesota and logging in Alaska.

Minnesota Gov. Tim Waltz, who opposes recreational wolf hunting, called the decision disappointing and wildlife advocacy groups pledged to fight it in court.

Both feared and revered by people, gray wolves have recovered from near extinction in parts of the country but remain absent from much of their historical range.

Federal wildlife officials contend thriving populations in the western Great Lakes region, Rocky Mountains and Pacific Northwest ensure the species’ long-term survival. They argue it’s not necessary for wolves to be in every place they once inhabited to be considered recovered.

Of course it’s not necessary for them to be everywhere they once were, and it is actually insane to make the claim that they should be everywhere they once inhabited. Wolves are literally dangerous to humans.

The single reason that there aren’t regular wolf-on-human attacks in our records is that wolves were hunted near to extinction in the early days of the country – largely because they were dangerous.

Wikipedia:

Wolf numbers consistently dropped across the US during the 20th century and by the 1970s they were only significantly present in Minnesota and Alaska (though in greatly reduced populations than prior to the European colonization of the Americas). The resulting decrease in human-wolf and livestock-wolf interactions helped contribute to a view of wolves as not dangerous to humans. By the 1970s, the pro-wolf lobby aimed to change public attitudes towards wolves, with the phrase “there has never been a documented case of a healthy wild wolf attacking a human in North America” (or variations thereof) becoming a slogan for people seeking to create a more positive image for the wolf. Several non-fatal attacks including the April 26, 2000, attack on a 6-year-old boy in Icy Bay, Alaska, seriously challenged the assumption that healthy wild wolves were harmless. The event was considered unusual and was reported in newspapers throughout the entire United States. Following the Icy Bay incident, biologist Mark E. McNay compiled a record of wolf-human encounters in Canada and Alaska from 1915 to 2001. Of the 80 described encounters, 39 involved aggressive behavior from apparently healthy wolves and 12 from animals confirmed to be rabid.

The first fatal attack in the 21st century occurred on November 8, 2005, when a young man was killed by wolves that had been habituated to people in Points North Landing, Saskatchewan, Canada while on March 8, 2010, a young woman was killed while jogging near Chignik, Alaska.

We have all of these stories of wolf attacks in our mythology – the Big Bad Wolf, and so on.

Where do those stories come from?

Well, in Europe, there were regular wolf attacks. Thousands dead. Those stories are to remind us.

As wolves have been brought back, attacks have become a thing, and they will get worse and worse the more of them there are.

Of course, the more practical consideration is what they do to livestock. Wolves are a disaster for sheep farmers, but they can even kill cows.

People say they’re beautiful.

So urbanites, who have no idea what is going on out in the rural areas, because they’ve never left the city in their lives, what them running around everywhere. It’s a bit like how upper-middle class people in all white neighborhoods push for nonwhite immigration into working class neighborhoods.

Imagine being a farmer and all your sheep are getting killed by wolves and you’re not allowed to kill the wolf because some hipster faggot in the city thinks it’s sad if a wolf dies.

The reason wolves are “endangered” now is that people actively tried to exterminate them, because they were dangerous to humans and livestock. There are people in Alaska right now lobbying to exterminate them.

Here’s an essay by someone from Alaska explaining why wolves should be exterminated.

This dumb boomer hippy crap has to go away. We’ve had enough of it. Some millennials love it, but not to the same extent as the boomers. Younger people are totally disconnected from the Fern Gully cult.

Wolves should stay on nature reserves, or they should be shot, period.

This is almost like a fable about modernity and human nature.

We suffer from problems that our ancestors already solved.

SFGATE:

It was about half past midnight when Russ Fee woke up to the sound of frantic shouts coming from a campsite next to his in Canada’s Banff National Park. From within his tent, he listened, quickly discerning that the voices belonged to a man and a woman. They were screaming for help.

“I threw my shoes on. My wife tossed me a lantern,” Fee said in an interview Tuesday with the radio show “Calgary Eyeopener.” “I popped out of the tent and just started running toward their tent sort of yelling, ‘I’m here! I’m here! What’s wrong?'”

Fee, who is from Calgary, told the program that he expected to find “two really scared parents” whose child had wandered off into the woods. Instead, the sight that greeted him was much more distressing.

The family’s tent was in shambles, Fee said, and sticking out of its entrance was the rear end of a large wolf.

In what officials with Parks Canada are calling a “very rare incident,” a wolf attacked a New Jersey couple and their two children who were visiting the national park in Banff, Alberta, early Friday – a harrowing encounter that may have ended differently if it weren’t for Fee’s quick thinking, Canadian Broadcasting Corp. reported.

“We are forever grateful to Russ who came to our aid,” Elisa Rispoli, whose husband, Matt, was injured in the attack, wrote on Facebook. Describing Fee as a “guardian angel,” Elisa added that the Canadian man probably saved her husband’s life.

“It could have been so so much worse, and we are just feeling so thankful that we are all still sitting here as a complete family,” she wrote.

The Rispolis were asleep in their tent at the park’s Rampart Creek Campground when they were jolted awake after midnight by the wolf.

“It was like something out of a horror movie,” Elisa wrote in the Facebook post.

Matt instantly threw himself in front of his wife and the children, fighting the predator as it ripped apart the tent. While her husband was trying to keep the wolf at bay, Elisa wrote that she lay on top of her two boys to shield them. Together, the couple cried out for help.

Luckily, Fee heard them.

When he arrived at the family’s campsite, Fee told “Calgary Eyeopener” that he saw the wolf attempting to yank something free of the tent, like it was “pulling on a toy.”

“It was big enough that I immediately figured out what it was, which is weird because I’ve never seen one outside of the zoo,” he said. “It was just so much larger than any dog I’ve ever seen.”

Inside the now mostly collapsed dwelling, an intense tug-of-war was unfolding. Elisa wrote that the animal had “started to drag Matt away” and she was holding on to his legs.

“I cannot and don’t think I’ll ever be able to properly describe the terror,” she wrote.

Meanwhile, as Fee ran toward the tent, carrying only the lantern his wife gave him, he devised a hasty plan.

“I just kind of kept running at it and I just kicked it . . . in the back hip area like I was kicking in a door,” he said on the radio show. “I booted it as hard as I could.”

The kick may not have done much physical damage, but Fee said it was enough to startle the wolf into letting Matt go. Then, the animal emerged from the tent and Fee said he “immediately regretted kicking it.”

“I felt like I had kind of punched someone that was way out of my weight class,” he said.

But before Fee had to think of another way to take on the wolf solo, he said Matt, whose “whole half side was just covered in blood,” came flying out of the tent. The two men began screaming at the wolf and hurling rocks about “the size of a head of cabbage” at the animal to drive it back, Fee said. Soon, the wolf was far enough away that the group was able to flee to Fee’s campsite, where they hid in his minivan.

What if there were no rocks around to throw at it though?

Humans really are defenseless meatbags; no claws, no fangs, no poisonous sting, no thick skin or fur. Just meat in a thin skin bag.

Wouldn’t it be great if we had a way to defend ourselves against such wild beasts?

Wait.

Hold on.

I’m getting some flashbacks.

Humans figured out how to defend themselves long ago: we build weapons and WE CARRY THEM. It’s part of human nature to be ARMED, it’s what we needed to do in order to survive and thrive, and it is still helping us survive to this day.

Carrying weapons to defend ourselves is part of our nature. We’ve done it since forever.

These are our claws and fangs.

Would you rather get mauled by a wolf while you try to defend your family and maybe get saved by a stranger or just fire a couple of warning shots to scare the wolf away?

Carrying weapons should be a human right.

Being armed to the teeth is our nature. It is our values. It is who we are.

Opposing guns is anti-human — it is pure misanthropy.

Canada is home to 60,000 wolves, the second-largest wolf population in the world after Russia, according to the International Wolf Center. But wolf-human encounters, especially those that result in injury or death, are infrequent, according to a 2002 report that examined 80 cases in Alaska and Canada over a roughly 60-year period. The case history found 41 incidents of people coming into contact with wolves in Canada. Of those, only four involved the animals attacking and seriously injuring people.

“A person in wolf country has a greater chance of being killed by a dog, lightning, a bee sting or a car collision with a deer than being injured by a wolf,” the center wrote.

A person in the West today has a greater chance of being killed by a black or brown than by wild animals.

Blacks and browns are today’s wild beasts.

We need to embrace our nature and get armed to the teeth.