On some level, I pity a lot of women. Like, they wish they had some of that male creativity and innate connection with the divine. That’s one of the reasons why they always try to insert themselves into male arenas.

It’s like your annoying little brother trying to play with the big boys, but he just can’t quite hack it because of low hand-eye coordination or whatever.

Same thing at work here.

RT:

Police deployed tear gas at protesters in the Indian state of Kerala. Outrage grew after two women – backed by a landmark court ruling – entered a shrine which has historically been forbidden to females of menstruating age.

Men need places where they can get away from the petty social striving and crass materialistic concerns of women. Unsurprisingly, they designate such spaces as holy spaces.

#Sabarimala belongs to everyone. https://t.co/NybxMjxsqv

— Hindustani (@I_Hindu_stani) January 2, 2019

Clashes between police and demonstrators broke out simultaneously in several towns throughout the state, including a large-scale conflict in front of the state parliament in Thiruvananthapuram. The traditionalist Hindu protesters gathered in anger after it became public that the women had entered the Sabarimala temple dedicated to the celibate God Ayyappa.

A THOT patrol/posse formed spontaneously because these Hindus don’t fuck around. 

And the Globo-Homo police were sent in.

Where are the “WHITE SHARIAH NOW!” people on this one, eh?

No, but like seriously. I try not to counter-signal the meme because I genuinely do find it funny. But I just know from experience now, that there’s always some dum-dum who is going to take it literally and assume that Islam is based or the Way of the Pimp Hand or w/e and that’s just not true.

We make these jokes and we’re 90% sure that people get that we’re joking… but sometimes, at the risk of killing the joke, we gotta have a serious to make sure that we’re all on the same page.

So here’s the thing. 

Every religion with any staying power is good on the woman thing. This is because any religion with staying power needs to be built by wise men. Wise men know the true nature of women and include it in their religions.

Christianity and Hinduism and Buddhism are all good on women. No worse than Islam.

Plenty of Christian scripture to point to, and then there’s this Hindu story as proof, so that leaves Buddhism and you can just trust me on that one – Buddhists are based AF and know what’s up with women as well.

The thing about Christianity though is that it’s like the US Constitution.

It assumes that it’s dealing with a higher class of people and it takes that into mind when prescribing how to live one’s life. 

In the same way, the US Constitution assumes that it is a government of White men of good character with Christian values. Both Christianity and the Constitution leave a lot unsaid and a lot implicit because they just assume that you’re not retarded and your shit’s not all fucked up.

As an example, you won’t find in the US Constitution an “anti-Gay Islamo-tranny law” anywhere.

Now, does this mean that the US Constitution and its Founders and the first Americans were soft on the gay Islamo-tranny question?

Well, it seems only logical that they were, right?

Therefore, really, when you think about it, the Founders were cucks and the Constitution is worthless. 

Nah, Jack. That ain’t how it works, so chill.

The Constitution didn’t say a lot of things because a lot of things were implicitly…

… understood.

The Constitution assumed that it was dealing with people who knew right from wrong.

Christianity is quite similar in that regard. 

In Islam, by contrast, you have a religion that tells you what to eat, what direction to kneel, how many times to pray, what hand to wipe your ass with and how many lashes of the belt are needed to keep the woman in line.

This is because – and you will notice the same thing with the whole Constitution analogy – dumber and worserer people need more explicit instructions. They need firm discipline at all times and crushing punishments to keep their bad character at bay. They need a constant watchdog in their lives, monitoring them and keeping them on the straight and narrow.

Maybe you have friends like this, even.

I know I do. I told one of them that his life would legit improve if he was in a concentration camp because there at least he would get the discipline from an authority figure that he so sorely needed. And this was a Fascist I was dealing with. But I guess, more importantly, he was a messed up slob. On a deeper level, the reason that he was attracted to old-school Fascism was the desire to have someone force him to do what he was too weak and lazy and degenerate to do.

He needed a watchdog and personal coach in his life.

A lot of these old structures like Christianity and the Constitution (by extension American values) are sound, but they just made a lot of assumptions about the state of people.

We, however, live in a completely degraded era. 

Basic truths about the nature of the world are now pretty much outlawed.

So yeah, we may indeed need to get back down to basics for a while. To start spelling out basic truths again in black and white. To enter a period of harsh austerity until we trim the fat, and get our feet squarely beneath us again.

That doesn’t have to be Islam or any other foreign religion (although if we do go down that road, I vote for Buddhism).

It just needs to be a more explicit revision and adaption of the source material that built the White world.

So instead, think explicit Christianocracy. Explicit Constitutionalism. And explicit life-coaching.

Just until behavior improves.

There’s a new documentary coming out about ISIS brides. Should be interesting.

BBC:

An American woman who lived with the Islamic State group in Syria for more than two years has told her story for the first time.

Sam El Hassani claimed in an interview, while being watched by Kurdish security forces, that she and her two children were taken to Raqqa by her husband Mousa. One of the children appeared in an IS propaganda video.

In the video, you can see that the woman was a blond when she got married to the sandnigger.

Why is that important?

Well, because she had to change the color of her hair when she was with ISIS.

This is one of the consequences of living with subhuman non-White savages. You have to make yourself uglier to blend in. We see it all the time in the ghetto. The Whites that are left behind have to niggerfy themselves. The women start acting black and dressing black. They dye their hair, wear rapper clothes and get fatter to blend in better and to be more appealing to black people’s garbage tastes.

It’s sad.

I don’t want to get into a debate about whether she’s pure-White or not, the point still stands

LISTEN UP, LADIES: When you go native, you will invariably lower yourself to the mean of the other women. If you don’t, the harpies will tear you to bits. Men will fight over you and cause your stupid sandnigger husband trouble so he will actively try to conceal your looks as well. Your kids will be picked on and bullied.

In short, you will come to resemble the orcs that you live around.

And that’s a shame. Life is about self-improvement, not about self-destruction. Even on like a Western Zen, self-help, Oprah-tier wisdom kind of level – you’re still fucking up.

And even though this chick is White, there should be a no sympathy policy towards retarded whores like her.

In a sane society, we would flog and then crucify her for all the town/city to see if she came back to the US as a warning to others. As things stand now though, this chick is actually going to get away with this I guaranfuckingtee you.

Her husband is dead – praise Allah – and her stupid fat sister is trying to petition the US government to take her back into the country.

For now, she’s saying she doesn’t want to go back…but c’mon, what else is she supposed to do?

And then all the other women will hear about her fun Arabian adventure or w/e. She’ll get a reality TV show offer.

But those are just my predictions. When the full documentary comes out, we’ll have to see.

Instead of just enjoying an entire day dedicated to making them feel special, these delusional hos decided to chimp out yet again.

RT:

Hundreds of trains in Spain have been cancelled due to an International Women’s Day strike. Women across the country are also abandoning their unpaid work, such as cleaning and child care, as part of the large scale protest.

What Western woman takes care of children or cooks and cleans anymore?

It is the first time there has been a nationwide “feminist strike” in Spain and organizers say it aims to highlight sexual discrimination and domestic violence. The rail network and Madrid’s underground is disrupted as 10 unions participate in 24 hour work stoppages. The country’s two largest unions, Workers’ Commissions and the General Union of Workers, are calling for only a two hour stoppage.

I’m not even against having an International Woman’s Day. I think it’s a nice idea to remind women that we think they smell nice and that we like their long swishing hair and sex with them is fun, I guess.

If we’re going to have International Woman’s Day though, there should also be an “International Burn a Witch Day” and “International Shame a THOT Day.”

It’s only fair that we reward AND punish.

Women have been really fucking up in the West and because of that, I actually think we should start calling them womyn now, because I don’t want to be reminded that these skanks came from my great-great-ur-daddy’s left rib.

If you don’t know, Women’s Day is a Communist holiday cooked up in America that made it over to the Soviet Union, where it was the only place it actually stuck.

But the slavs just made it into a nice holiday where you give women flowers and say some nice things about them over drinks. Women and men look forward to the holiday in Eastern Europe because frankly, it’s quite nice.

Putin uses the occasion to honor mothers of large families. And this year, some Russians started passing out flowers in America.

The reactions of the American women were priceless. And so is the anchor’s commentary in this video. “Women are not used to getting flowers on Women’s day, but view it as a day for protesting.”

Just saying. Very sad. Not to beat a dead horse, but something’s fucked up about Western women.

Anyways, here are some of the benefits that brave, stronk and empowered wimmins have brought to our societies:

• college false rape allegations
• mass migration from shithole countries
• divorce rape
• school shooters
• fines for not wearing bicycle helmets
• consumerism
• wages cut in half
• herpes
• fat acceptance
• speech codes

So thanks, ladies?

No, but seriously, I can’t even talk to Western women anymore. So I’m not going to be wishing them a Happy Women’s Day. Because they’ve squandered any goodwill I could have felt towards them.

Here’s to replacing this squandered holiday with White Sharia day in the West very, very soon.

It’s about time we turned these little shitlords into flaming homos.

Generation Z is looking to become full-blown Nazis as they get red-pilled by the catastrophic levels of “diversity” in their schools, as well as our own unrelenting efforts.

The Jews and thots rightfully fear this development, and are plotting dark schemes to somehow reverse this Nazification of the youth.

So, what exactly is the opposite of a Nazi?

The opposite of a Nazi is a faggot.

And so, the plan is to somehow raise the next generation of boys to be even more feminine, passive and submissive, in order to turn them off of WHITE SHARIA, racial hatred and, presumably, dank memes.

The Jew fake news outlet “The New York Times” is pioneering this effort with an article instructing women to raise their little boys like faggots.

Someday, we will capture this citadel of darkness, and after it is cleansed of it’s evil, it will become the new seat of our power. Which is to say, our new office.

New York Times:

If we want to create an equitable society, one in which everyone can thrive, we need to also give boys more choices. As Gloria Steinem says, “I’m glad we’ve begun to raise our daughters more like our sons, but it will never work until we raise our sons more like our daughters.”

What could possibly go wrong, goyim?

That’s because women’s roles can’t expand if men’s don’t, too. But it’s not just about women. Men are falling behind in school and work because we are not raising boys to succeed in the new, pink economy. Skills like cooperation, empathy and diligence — often considered to be feminine — are increasingly valued in modern-day work and school, and jobs that require these skills are the fastest-growing.

“Often considered to be feminine.”

What a load of BS.

Women, especially in the workforce, all hate each other and can’t cooperate properly within a team. Cooperation was never something women had to be good at in the evolutionary environment – unlike men. Cooperation is crucial to hunting, war and other masculine endeavors; it isn’t for child-rearing and taking care of a household.

This is real cooperation.

I’ve never met a woman who was capable of true empathy either. They just project their own desires and feelings on others, which is the opposite of empathy.

Don’t even get me started on the idea that women are “diligent.” Everyone knows that men always have to pick up the slack when women enter the workforce.

In her new book, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, the Nigerian-born author, gives instructions for raising a feminist daughter. But how can we raise feminist sons?

Well, obviously, the first step is to lie to them constantly about the nature of women – for example, by telling them that women are better at cooperation, empathy and diligence.

I asked neuroscientists, economists, psychologists and others to answer that question, based on the latest research and data we have about gender. I defined feminist simply, as someone who believes in the full equality of men and women. Their advice applied broadly: to anyone who wants to raise children who are kind, confident and free to pursue their dreams.

According to this definition, a feminist is someone who is incapable of grasping obvious realities about life.

So, what kind of advice do the kikes at the NYT have for us goyim trying to raise our boys right?

Let him cry

…

“Our daughters are allowed to be human beings, and our sons are taught to be robotic,” he said. “Teach him that he has a full range of emotions, to stop and say, ‘I’m not angry; I’m scared, or my feelings are hurt, or I need help.’”

In other words: redirect aggressive, active emotions into passive, submissive emotions.

Give him role models

…

Give them strong female role models, too. Talk about the achievements of women you know, and well-known women in sports, politics or media.

Make sure you don’t give your boy this kind of role model:

But instead force him to look up to “strong, independent womyn” like this:

Make them niggers, too, while you’re at it.

Let him be himself

…

Offer open-ended activities, like playing with blocks or clay, and encourage boys to try activities like dress-up or art class, even if they don’t seek them out, social scientists say. Call out stereotypes. (“It’s too bad that toy box shows all girls because I know boys also like to play with dollhouses.”)It could also improve the status of women. Researchers say the reason parents encourage daughters to play soccer or become doctors, but not sons to take ballet or become nurses, is that “feminine” equals lower status.

“It could also improve the status of women.”

Ah, so this is what this is all about, huh…

Basically, if men start doing the things that women like to do, maybe those things will become high-status occupations somehow.

Funny that this advice about how to raise your boy is concerned with what’s good for women, rather than what’s good for the boy, isn’t it?

Teach him to take care of himself

…

“Teach our sons to cook, clean and look after themselves — to be equally competent in the home as we would expect our daughters to be in the office,” said Anne-Marie Slaughter, chief executive of New America, a think tank.

Maybe teach them to wear maid outfits and cat ears, too, while you’re at it.

Encourage friendships with girls

…

Boys who have friendships with girls are also less likely to think of women as sexual conquests, Mr. Porter said.

Yeah, if boys think of girls as “friends,” they’re going to be less likely to get laid. This whole education program is designed to make boys into spiritual eunuchs, with no male impulses whatsoever.

Teach ‘no means no’

Other ways to teach respect and consent: Require children to ask before they touch one another’s bodies as early as preschool. Also, teach them the power of the word no — stop tickling them or wrestling with them when they say it.

This is completely sickening. In fact, this is child abuse.

Having these kinds of rules will ensure that boys will become neurotic betas who are constantly worried about touching other people.

Strong, dominant men have no problem touching others. And they don’t “ask for permission” first.

Even if this program of systematic child abuse doesn’t turn boys into actual homosexuals, it’s sure to turn them into weak, effeminate beta-males who will be incapable of being attractive to women or taking control over their own lives.

And they know this, of course.

This isn’t about “helping” boys. It’s about completely destroying masculinity, in order to even the playing field for girls.