I ain’t been seen a culture get enriched like this in a minute.

Breitbart:

The number of refugees resettled in Britain through official schemes has increased by 56 times over the past year compared to the average over the the previous five years, according to a report from Migration Watch UK.

The think tank, which advocates for reasonable border control against mass migration said that direct refugee immigration to the UK over the past year totalled approximately 240,000 people, up from an average of around 4,200 per year between 2015 and 2020.

The massive increase in refugee resettlement in Britain was driven in large part by Ukrainians and Hong Kongers fleeing their homelands. According to the Migration Watch analysis, around 150,000 refugees from Ukraine have arrived in Britain since the start of 2021, while another 120,000 people have used the British National Overseas (BNO) route offered to those fleeing from Hong Kong after the brutal crackdown on freedoms by the Chinese Communist Party to resettle in the UK.

An additional 21,450 refugees have come to Britain from Afghanistan following the country’s fall to the Taliban after the bungled withdrawal from the country by the Biden administration.

The think tank noted that “worryingly” the government has so far been unable to identify which specific legal routes those fleeing from Afghanistan have used to get to the UK, highlighting the ramshackle efforts during the chaotic fall of the country.

Cost of Asylum Seekers Tops £2 Billion a Year Amid Record Waves of Illegal Boat Migrantshttps://t.co/LljhTBdbsZ

— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) August 26, 2022

In comments provided to Breitbart London, Migration Watch UK Chairman Alp Mehmet said: “The latest Migration Watch analysis has revealed a remarkable 56-fold increase in resettlement compared to 2015-2020 levels. This after the government had clearly promised voters that overall immigration would come down.

The guy running the biggest anti-immigration think tank in Britain is a Turk.

I just wanted to point that out.

“The breath-taking scale of resettlement has major implications for communities and involves large amounts of public funds being spent on accommodation (including hotels) and places ever greater pressure on services. It is at an unsustainable level. We must control our borders and reduce immigration without delay.

“Meanwhile, over a year after the Taliban seized power, the government still can’t tell us the numbers who have arrived respectively via each of the specific resettlement routes from Afghanistan. This failure to release adequate data hugely damages transparency and accountability and is a disservice to the hard-pressed taxpayer.”

Security concerns were raised about the vast numbers of Afghans evacuated in the wake of the unilateral American withdrawal from the country, with the UK Border Force admitting last year that many Afghans were arriving in the country with forged identity documents.

Following reports of people on no-fly terror lists being evacuated into Britain — apparently in error — Breitbart London questioned the Home Office as to how many Afghans who were brought to Britain turned out to be either on watch lists or persons previously deported from Britain, but the Home Office replied that it was “not in the public interest” to reveal such data.

'Too Cold' – Afghan Refugees Refuse Free Homes in Scotland and Wales https://t.co/rHFuD8uuY1

— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) August 14, 2022

In addition to the massive influx of refugees through legal channels, the UK asylum system has already been strained by the migrant boat crisis in the English Channel, in which nearly all of the illegal aliens who arrive by people-smuggler boats from France claim asylum in the UK, despite coming from a safe European country where they should apply for asylum.

According to analysis conducted by the PA news agency, some 75,628 migrants have been recorded making the illegal journey, with another 856 arriving on Monday, marking the fifth straight day of illegal landings.

In addition to record levels of illegal immigration and soaring numbers or resettled refugees, legal immigration has also jumped to new highs, with Boris Johnson’s government handing out a record 1.1 million visas to foreigners last year.

Remember when John Cleese said it was bad that London was no longer white, and all those colored people came out and complained?

It turns out he was right.

Apparently, the British chose to live in a nonwhite country. They must have wanted it, because Britain is a democracy, and that means people only get what they ask for.

Those aren’t French they’re talking about

The situation with women is the same as the situation with the Jews: these people have total power, ruling over us, and yet pretend to be oppressed.

Their explanation as to the nature of their oppression is always some theoretical mumbo-jumbo that doesn’t mean anything.

The Guardian:

Young French women will be offered free contraception from next year, the health minister has announced.

Olivier Véran said those under 25 would not be charged for medical appointments, tests, or other medical procedures related to birth control.

“This will cover hormonal contraception, biological tests that go with it, the prescription of contraception and all care related to this contraception up until the age of 25,” the minister said in an interview with France 2.

“There is a decline in the use of contraception among a certain number of young women and the main reason for this is financial. It costs too much. It is unacceptable that women cannot protect themselves, cannot have contraception if that’s their choice obviously, because they cannot afford it,” Véran added.

Asked why the government had chosen 25 as the cut-off age, Véran said it was because this corresponded to an age of more autonomy and because at 25 people were no longer covered by their parents’ complementary health insurance, called a mutuelle.

He said studies had shown this was also the age that many women were dropping contraception, not because they wanted to have children but “because it is expensive”.

The measure, which covers the pill, IUD devices and contraceptive implants, is expected to cost France’s health system, the Assurance Maladie, about €21m a year.

Contraception has been free in France for those aged between 15 and 18 since 2013 and for the under-15s since August 2020. This has led to a drop in the number of abortions.

The government announced last year that almost 1,000 girls aged between 12 and 14 become pregnant in France and 770 of those pregnancies result in an abortion.

So, wait – we’re trying to prevent abortion now?

I thought abortion was good?

If women are going to get free birth control pills from the government, men should get free video games.

Swedes are finally going to pay the price for their Swedishness!

Total elimination of the Swedish race is just on the horizon!

The Swedes should have known better than to be Swedish!

Sputnik News:

As of today, more than one-third of all Swedish residents have some kind of foreign background, and their share continues to grow, owing to continued immigration and demographic trends that include differences in fertility rates.

If the current level of immigration persists, Swedes will become a minority in their own country within 45 years, according to a Finnish researcher, Kyösti Tarvainen, associate professor emeritus in systems analysis at Aalto University in Helsinki.

Using the standard demographic method, the so-called cohort component method, Tarvainen concluded that which unchanged immigration, ethnic Swedes will become outnumbered by 2065.

The demographic change will bring about large societal shifts as well. According to Tarvainen’s model, there will be as many Muslims as ethnic Swedes in 2100.

“The Swedish parliament unanimously decided in 1975 that Sweden is a multicultural country. At that time, more than 40 percent of the immigrants were my compatriots, Finns. The situation has changed: in 2019, 88 percent of net immigrants were non-Westerners and 52 percent were Muslims. Thus, a huge cultural change has taken place in the immigrant population, as its largest group has changed from being Finns to being Muslims,” Tarvainen wrote in his opinion piece in the newspaper Folkbladet.

According to Tarvainen, the marked difference is that the Finnish immigrants quickly assimilated into Swedish society. Today, he argued, the conditions are different as a large proportion of immigrants are not assimilated or successfully integrated into society. Instead, they form their own areas, commonly referred to as areas of exclusion, vulnerable areas or no-go zones, which are largely parallel societies with a different mindset and a way of life. This, according to Tarvainen, results in reduced trust and social cohesion.

If and when the ethnic Swedes become a minority, the pace of demographic change will probably increase further because a majority of people with a foreign background will facilitate immigration for their own ethnic group, Tarvainen mused.

“Prominent Swedish engineers and businessmen will ensure that the Swedish economy does not collapse. But Swedish society and culture will lose their leading position. This demographic development can be stopped, but it will require radical changes in immigration policy. We are in a historically unique situation, and we northerners must begin to discuss immigration and the preservation of our nation-states,” Tarvainen concluded.

It’s pure hatred of the color of the skin to want to preserve the Swedish race.

After all, race doesn’t even exist. The single difference between a Swedish person and someone from the jungles of the Congo is that a Swedish person was lucky enough to be born in a rich country. If every person in the Congo had been born in Sweden, the Congo would be just as wealthy as Swede.

it’s the luck of the draw, and we have to even the odds by exterminating the Swedish race.

The one question I have is: how can Swedes actually be eliminated when they never existed in the first place?

Race doesn’t exist and therefore Swedes never existed, and therefore actually, when they get replaced with foreigners, they’re not being replaced with foreigners, they’re being replaced with themselves.

Hey there, fellow Swedes

One of the least funny men in television history, Stephen Colbert, seems to have gone full-whore for his Jewish Media Overlords.

This is not surprising. He’s always been a lefty, and with no weapons to speak of in his comedic arsenal other than a ham-handed snark impersonation of Bill O’Reilly (a character he milked until it’s udders bled) he has little to nothing left to offer in terms of actual humor or entertainment value.

Daily Caller:

Late night host Stephen Colbert asked guest Ta-Nehisi Coates Monday whether there would be more hope in America “as white people become the minority.”
Colbert asked Coates, “I’m not asking you to make sh*t up. I’m asking you if you personally see any chance for change in America?”

“Maybe, maybe,” Coates answered. “I would have to make sh*t up to actually answer that question in a satisfying way.”

Colbert then said, “What about the changing demographics in America? We have a constitutional system, democracy itself–while not rubber is plastic–and as the demographics change, as white people become the minority in the country which is coming, do you see a chance for?”

Coates interrupted, “Your question presumes there is a static definition of whiteness and this is the first time there’s been demographic change before…”

It is good that these people are either so comfortable in their cultural hegemony, or so unhinged at the rise of nationalism in America, or most likely both, that they are openly discussing our demise as a people and the inevitable tyranny that will come down on Whites as a result.

It’s even better that they discuss this as though it is inevitable and a thing to be celebrated.

Why is this so great?

Because it strikes at the heart of the Jewish narrative that has been fed to White conservatives for many decades now. Mainly, that America is not a distinct nation with a distinct people, but a giant “melting pot” where everything gets thrown in and mixed up until we have this massive brown blob of a populace, and then everything will be flowers and rainbows and pretty ponies.

It strikes further into the Jewish narrative that White conservatives have been feeding themselves, both for the purpose of virtue signaling, but more importantly, to salve their own fears about what is to come – that it doesn’t matter whether the country turns brown or not, so long as the new brown people all come here legally, are pro-gun, and love the Constitution.

Sorry Alex, but American Nationalism is once again on the rise. As it rises, you can either admit what is actually happening, or you can stick to your color blind blathering sprinkled between ads for penis juice.

But no one is going to listen to this nonsense much longer.

No matter how willfully blind the great masses of White American Conservatives have been when it comes to matters of race, even they will see the writing on the wall when the left continues to celebrate our loss of any political capital in every White nation.

When they do, most of them will join us. The rest will get out of the way.

HAIL VICTORY!

While a majority of white people are concerned on some level, there is a significant minority of our people who are aloof in the face of our demographic decline.

There is already a test case for what inevitably happens when non-whites are a physical majority, South Africa. California is rapidly turning into another example, despite the fact that most of the whites there are affluent and very “liberal.”

NY Daily News:

Three people were killed Tuesday in a central Fresno shooting spree, and cops said the man responsible gunned down a security guard several days ago outside a nearby motel.

Cops said Kori Ali Muhammad, 39, fired at least 16 rounds in less than a minute at four locations, including a Catholic Charities facility, where he killed a man in a parking lot.

Muhammad launched the attack shortly before 2 p.m. when he approached a utility truck and shot the passenger.

The gunman then fired several rounds at another man, striking and killing him.

After reloading at a bus stop, the gunman shot and killed a man in the Catholic Charities parking lot.

“This was a random act of violence,” said Fresno Police Chief Jerry Dyer. “These were unprovoked attacks by an individual who was intent on carrying out homicides today.”

…

Dyer said all of Muhammad’s victims Tuesday were white. Social media accounts linked to Muhammad, who is black, expressed anti-white and anti-government sentiments, Dyer said.

Muhammad also yelled “Allahu Akbar” — Arabic for “God is Great” — during the incident and bellowed the religious phrase again from the back of a police cruiser.

Dyer dismissed that the shooter’s crime spree was an act of terrorism.

“We believe it’s a hate crime,” Dyer said at a media briefing Tuesday evening.

Muhammad used the alias “Black Jesus,” officials said.

The M.O. from all the players involved is familiar: the victims are white working stiffs and another man whose charity specifically aids only non-whites. Jews are often the exemption, because they ensure to rig the system so they can stay segregated with their porn and Hollywood money, while the white-skinned Goyim are left to fend for themselves within a frame of gunpoint integration.

On top of that, a crime that is clearly racially motivated is dismissed as a “random act of violence” by Fresno’s #1 Dunkin’ Donuts aficionado. It’s not Blue Lives that matter, it’s WHITE LIVES.

Conservative pundits are focusing on the fact that he yelled “Allahu Akbar,” but generally speaking, ISIS terrorism is as a rule independent of a racial motive. This was just some violent nigger felon who read some Quran cliffnotes in prison, and blurted the words “Allahu Akbar” instead of “Suk My Dik” with little rhyme or reason.

This is what occurs when the Jew browbeats and legislates handcuffs on the white man while shaking the monkey cage housing Kori Ali Muhammad.

Fresno is 30% white and dropping, there just aren’t enough white people to organize and vote to keep their families safe. Your town is next.

Organizations like the SPLC and the ADL, who radicalize these men in hatred of whites, should be held legally accountable for when the inevitable occurs.

Even while it is an obvious and admitted fact that all White nations are being purposefully multiculturalized to the end of making them racial melting pots, a New York Times op-ed writer named Richard Alba, in a piece pretentiously entitled “The Myth of the White Minority,” has taken it on himself to explain that this isn’t actually happening and those who think it is are paranoid racists who can’t understand math (that’s “maths” for the the fag-smoking stick-shifters out there).

Alba is – you’re not going to believe this one – a Jew. Alba is a sociologist Jew who has written for the Jews about the plight of Jews assimilating into American culture.

It’s great that we have these Jews, so much smarter than us, to explain to us our faults as White people.

In 2012, the Census Bureau announced that nonwhite births exceeded white births for the first time. In 2013, it noted that more whites were dying than were being born. In March, it projected that non-Hispanic whites would be a minority by 2044.

But the forecast of an imminent white minority, which some take as a given, is wrong. We will seem like a majority-white society for much longer than is believed.

“Seem like”? Does that mean that it will be real in our minds?

I thought this was about math, Schlomo.

The predictions make sense only if you accept the outdated, illogical methods used by the census, which define as a “minority” anyone who belongs to “any group other than non-Hispanic White alone.” In the words “group” and “alone” lie a host of confusions.

The words “group” and “alone”?

Schlomo, I know the meanings of those two words. I know the meanings well. Those words do not confuse me. I myself am a part of a “group” which is non-Hispanic White “alone.”

Where are we going with this?

A report the Pew Research Center is releasing today on multiracial Americans demonstrates how problematic these definitions have become. Pew estimates that 8.9 percent of Americans now have family backgrounds that involve some combination of white, black, Latino, Asian and Native American.

“Mixed” unions — intermarriages and long-lasting cohabitations — have become far more common. According to a 2012 Pew report, 15 percent of new marriages cross the major lines of race or Hispanic origin. Some 70 percent of these relationships involve a white partner and a minority spouse. The most common minority partners for whites are Latinos, followed by Asians, though the frequency of white-black marriage also continues to rise.

Wait, so the confusion is along the lines of “well, there will be people who are part White”? That doesn’t confuse me either. It does infuriate me.

But even as the on-the-ground understanding of race and ethnicity becomes more fluid, contingent and overlapping, our public conversation lags.

Take, for example, the claim that “minority babies are now the majority.” Analyzing data from the 2013 American Community Survey, I found that it identified only about half of infants (children under 1) as non-Hispanic whites — though 60 percent had at least one non-Hispanic white parent. The discrepancy arises because of demographic convention: The census counts as minority anyone of mixed race or ethnicity.

That is not a “convention,” it is a fact.

A half-White person is not White.

Schlomo, I am starting to think you may be trying to use words to purposefully confound your readers. If you weren’t one of God’s chosen people, I would presently be questioning your integrity.

Next you’re going to start calling me a racist for doubting your positions.

Just joking, Schlomo. Deceitful as you may be, I know you wouldn’t ever sink that low.

For much of our racist past, all partly white, partly black individuals were socially and legally defined as black. The “one drop” rule was absurd, of course, yet it has effectively returned, with a vengeance, via statistical categories. There is no justification for viewing as not white all children who are partly white and being raised in a family that includes a white parent and two white grandparents, to say nothing of aunts, uncles and cousins.

Ah.

The Jared Taylor method.

Interesting angle.

Some of the mixed children now classified as minorities surely will think of themselves mainly as whites when they grow up; researchers have already found a significant group of American adults who declare themselves as non-Hispanic whites to the census, but acknowledge having some Mexican ancestry. Others may have mixed or even minority identities, but will be “sociologically white,” integrated into white communities and family networks and seen as essentially no different from anyone else.

…

We are becoming a more diverse society, but not a post-racial one. For that reason we cannot abandon ethno-racial categories. They register legacies of slavery, conquest and oppression that have enduring effects. They are still useful, to measure and redress inequalities.

But we need to admit that these categories are at best rough approximations when it comes to understanding who we are becoming. Our society, transformed by immigration and new forms of assimilation, hasn’t yet developed the vocabulary to capture the nuanced realities of this evolution.

So, in summation, the White minority is a myth as long as we change the definition of White.

Changing the meaning of things has been a long-running Jewish strategy for attempting to alter basic understandings of reality, so Dr. Alba’s position here is not surprising. It is, however, a stupid lie.

The Pew poll referenced in this Jew’s article allowed people to self-report, and these days people are much more likely to claim they have some Native Indian background, even when they actually don’t, as a means of alleviating White guilt.

Whites breeding with other races does not make the country more White, it makes it less White. It pollutes the gene pool. The Whiter these people look and act, the worse it is, as the more likely it becomes that a full-blooded White person will breed with them and destroy their own genes.

The Huffington Post has produced a bizarre video mocking the end of White America, as we are on our way to having our population completely replaced by hordes of brown people.

It takes the form of an oh-so-clever satire of a 1950s PSA.

Check it.

It is difficult to know where to start, so let’s just start at the beginning.

It begins with “White people. They used to be everywhere.” And moves on to say that “when you’re the majority, America feels like one long sing-a-long around the campfire” – of course showing a KKK burning cross on the word “campfire.”

It then goes on to say that Whites will be a minority by 2044, so we must get ready to suffer – because being a minority means suffering, and we deserve to suffer because we made minorities suffer historically.

The narrator says we will be forced into ghettos, because we are a minority. We will be harassed by police and accused of crimes we didn’t commit. We will be relegated to degrading service jobs.

So, the theory is that a minority is always oppressed by a majority, and that is the only reason that non-Whites are poor and fail at everything in America while Whites are generally well-off and successful.

This is material for retarded children. It is almost unbelievable they have such nerve.

Though it is obviously nonsensical on the face of it, we can see from the places with Blacks majorities and White minorities that what they are presenting is utterly nonsensical. In Detroit, for instance, nearly the entire city is Black, and they still live like Black people. The same is true in South Africa.

Blacks and Latinos in America fail because of their IQ, not because of their relative numbers. And the idea that there is a conspiracy by Whites to accuse Blacks of crimes they didn’t commit? This is just a sick delusion. Blacks get blamed for the majority of crimes because they commit the majority of crimes. Look at these statistics from St. Louis.

The scary part is that South Africa has shown us that when Blacks do achieve power over Whites, they use it to abuse them in the ways shown in this video, and so that part is honest. When we are a minority, we will be punished.

The whole message of the SJWs is so completely insane. Why do we not have a right to exist? Because of historical crimes our ancestors allegedly committed? But I thought we were all just individuals, and couldn’t be held responsible for the behavior of our ancestors? If we are judging people based on the behavior of their ancestors, then clearly it doesn’t make much sense to believe that Africans whose ancestors were cannibals before they were brought to America have much of a real role to play in a developed society, right?

The recent study by Maureen Craig and Jennifer Richeson on the reactions of Whites to becoming a minority (discussed here) included a manipulation where experimental subjects (all Whites) read an “assuaging paragraph” intended to calm their fears about the impending minority status of Whites. The paragraph was a very authoritative sounding claim that “despite the shift in the demographic make-up, the relative societal status of different racial groups is likely to remain steady” and “White Americans are expected to continue to have higher average incomes and wealth compared to members of other racial groups.”

This was merely an experimental manipulation. The experimenters did not argue that the assuaging claim about White social status was true. But, given that they are proposing that fear of loss of social status is indeed the central mechanism underlying all their results, it is important to think about whether it is true or not. Again, the model they propose is that White people confronted with their impending status as a demographic minority fear a decline in their social status. This then motivates them to adopt a variety of positions associated with conservative politics in America, such as opposing a government role in healthcare, favoring more defense spending, and presumably opposing gay marriage, abortion, and restrictions on gun rights.

As the above chart shows, it’s not the case that Whites “have higher average incomes and wealth compared to members of other racial groups.” Asians have had a higher average income ever since they became a demographically significant group. Moreover, in states like California, Whites are losing out in competition with Asians and Latinos for valued resources, such as admission to the University of California (“California students feel UC admission squeeze“). Whites (26.8%) are now the third most common racial group in the UC system, following Asians (36.2%) and Latinos (28.8%) (the latter doubtless boosted by the rule that students in the top 9% of their  high school graduating class are automatically admitted; Blacks are underrepresented because race cannot be used as a criterion and there are few all-Black high schools as Latinos have colonized many formerly Black areas. Immigration has huge costs for Blacks as well as Whites).

Another aspect of the future decline in the economic position of Whites is highlighted in a recent report by James G. Gimpel, a professor of government at the University of Maryland, posted by the always valuable Center for Immigration Studies (Immigration’s Impact on Republican Political Prospects, 1980 to 2012). Importing millions of poor, uneducated people will be an ever-increasing drain on society as a whole and will lead to political power for redistributionist policies that will hurt Whites.

Prof. Gimpel’s study is focused on showing that supporting immigration is a losing strategy for Republicans long term — no surprise given the racialization of American politics in which non-Whites are coalescing in the Democratic Party. Gimpel’s argument is that importing millions of uneducated people produces greater income inequality and a large mass of voters who will favor income redistribution:

Census Bureau data indicate that immigration has added significantly to the nation’s low-income population. Immigrants and their minor children account for one-fourth of those in poverty and one-third of those without health insurance (Camarota 2012; Rector 2006). McCarty, Poole, and Rosenthal (2008) have described the connection between rising immigration, increasing economic inequality, and greater partisan polarization at the national level in some detail. Large numbers of immigrants arriving after 1965 have been unskilled, earning low wages, and exposing the native poor to wage competition.

Moreover, it is from areas of higher income inequality that we find the most support for a robust government with an expansive regulatory and redistributive role in the economy, among all citizens, not just immigrants. Not only do the counties exhibiting high income inequality vote more Democratic in presidential elections, they also produce tides of local opinion supportive of government regulation and policies to tax and redistribute wealth. …

Gimpel shows that there is a correlation between the Gini Index of income inequality and support for liberal policies of wealth redistribution and government regulation.

In short, Craig and Richeson’s assuaging paragraph reassuring Whites ignores the future costs of immigration to Whites. As the U.S. continues to import the poor and uneducated, there will be increasing electoral power behind redistributionist policies fueled by tax increases that will fall disproportionately on Whites. And as the electoral power of Whites decreases, the demands for such policies will become politically unstoppable. The same can be said for American conservative traditions of limited government and individual freedom.

Prof. Gimpel’s conclusion suggests that the tide of low-skill immigrants cannot be reasonably expected to be upwardly mobile given the continued downward pressure on wages produced by immigration.

Republicans are right to want to attract Latino voters. They are indisputably a growing share of the population and the electorate. But expanding the flow of low-skilled immigrants into an economy ill-suited to promote their upward mobility will be counterproductive given the evidence presented here.

The logic here is that low-skill immigrants will suffer as the U.S. continues to import millions of low-skilled immigrants like themselves. Prof. Gimpel suggests that Republicans should phrase their message to basically say that restricting immigration is good for the immigrants we already have:

At the same time, Republican reservations about higher immigration levels can be too easily typecast as racist and xenophobic. This is because the party’s elites have failed to deliver a clear message that they want a pro-immigrant policy of reduced immigration and that these two goals are complementary. Such a policy will also prove to be the best means moving immigrants toward the middle and upper income status that will promote their geographic and political mobility.

Whatever works.

However, it’s worth pointing out that one of the well-known costs of multiculturalism is that people are less willing to contribute to public goods like health care and education when the recipients are members of ethnic/ethnic outgroups — a result that flows naturally from evolutionary thinking. If Prof. Gimpel is correct that immigration leads to an ever-expanding and permanent underclass unable to improve themselves economically, the results will be explosive. As Whites decline in political power they will be increasingly unable to prevent being taxed to support public goods for this underclass of poor and unskilled non-Whites.

And although Prof. Gimpel prefers to couch his argument in terms of the effects of immigration on wages and the upward mobility of immigrants, a realist perspective on racial/ethnic differences in IQ like that put forward by Jason Richwine implies the same thing.

In either case, the result will be increasing resentment by Whites that will have cataclysmic political implications. When it is impossible to redress legitimate grievances at the ballot box, Whites will consider other means to attain their goals. Craig and Richeson’s results imply that Whites view becoming a minority as a threat to their social status, and they note that increased racial polarization is a likely outcome. When these threats to White’s economic status are increasingly obvious (despite the current media blackout) in a context where democratic methods are ineffective, things could change dramatically. One can easily imagine that explicit talk of White identity and interests would fall on fertile ground and that political rhetoric emphasizing the loss of traditional America would appeal to disempowered Whites.

Immigration advocates are playing a very dangerous game. Racial polarization in the context where a formerly dominant majority is in the position of not only ceding political power but also funding social services for the ascendant majority is a political time bomb.

Here, you have an obvious fact: an increase in multiculturalism causes people to increasingly hate multiculturalism, and this leads to a return to conservative politics.

From Science Daily:

Facing the prospect of racial minority groups becoming the overall majority in the United States leads White Americans to lean more toward the conservative end of the political spectrum, according to research published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

The findings suggest that increased diversity in the United States could actually lead to a wider partisan divide, with more White Americans expressing support for conservative policies.

Psychological scientists Maureen Craig and Jennifer Richeson of Northwestern University noticed a substantial amount of media attention when predictions were made that the “majority-minority” population shift would happen in 2050 or sooner.

“We wondered how this kind of ‘us-vs-them’ framing would be perceived by members of the current majority,” says Craig.

Craig and Richeson first examined data from 369 White participants who had described themselves as politically unaffiliated in a national Pew Research survey.

They found that participants who had read that California is a majority-minority state tended to lean more towards the Republican Party and rate their ideological attitudes as more conservative than participants who simply read that the Hispanic population had become equal in size to the Black population in the United States.

Importantly, participants’ political attitudes shifted to the right despite the fact that all of the participants had labeled themselves as politically independent.

Another experiment conducted with a nationally-representative sample yielded similar results, showing that White participants who read a press release about the impending majority-minority shift were more likely to endorse conservative policies — even policies that were race-neutral, such as health care reform and increased military spending — than those who simply read about greater geographic mobility.

Reminding Whites they are soon to be a minority is one of the main goals of the Daily Stormer.  It is necessary to push this and other simple points over and over and over again if we want results, and if we succeed in pushing these points, we are assured to get results.

The backlash is coming.

And you are right on the front lines.

Keep your chin up, White man.