Elon Musk, who has seven children, including a toddler, thinks there are 'not enough people' on Earth, and that could threaten human civilization.https://t.co/NuFnZLuvLU

— News18.com (@news18dotcom) December 9, 2021

It pains me to even say it after those unnatural acts he did with that gay dog: but I’m officially bullish on Elon Musk (please don’t confuse that with being bullish on Telsa stock, which in the long term, I’m not really – in the short term due to fed policy, I’m bullish on all assets, particularly anything involving the word “floki”).

Previously: 

• Go Off, King: Elon Musk Condemns Lunatic Spending of The Brandon Entity
•  Elon Tells Warmer Retards Not to Shut Down Nuclear Power Plants

Elon’s new haircut may have given him special powers.

How can you not be bullish on a guy saying stuff like this, regardless of what he might do with dogs?

I haven’t seen a powerful white man tell white people to have more babies since Vladimir Putin.

New York Post:

Tesla CEO Elon Musk believes the biggest threat to humanity is the declining birthrate, warning that civilization will “crumble” if people don’t start having more kids.

“I think one of the biggest risks to civilization is the low birthrate and the rapidly declining birthrate,” the father of six said at the Wall Street Journal’s annual CEO Council Monday evening.

“And yet, so many people, including smart people, think that there are too many people in the world and think that the population is growing out of control,” Musk continued.

“It’s completely the opposite. Please look at the numbers — if people don’t have more children, civilization is going to crumble, mark my words.”

…

In July of this year, analysts at Morgan Stanley attributed the declining birthrate to concerns related to climate change.

The “movement to not have children owing to fears over climate change is growing and impacting fertility rates quicker than any preceding trend in the field of fertility decline,” they said at the time.

I wish he would just come out and start posting real statistics about “climate change.”

He might.

I mean, the guy drunk tweets like no one else.

Of course, Tesla is apparently based around theories about the weather for most promoters of it, but he is obviously not stupid enough to actually believe this gibberish.

Musk with the child he refused to properly name.

Never forget that they did this on purpose and now they are blaming the victim.

The purpose of feminism was to destroy the birthrate (and society at large). No one asked for feminism. It was forced on the population from the top.

The Guardian:

Britain is facing a “baby shortage” that could lead to “long-term economic stagnation”, a thinktank has said.

The Social Market Foundation (SMF) said the birthrate was almost half what it was at its postwar peak in the 1960s, and the country’s ageing population could lead to economic decline.

It said ministers should set up a cross-government taskforce to consider the issue, and one helpful measure might be better childcare provision. The thinktank said typical British working parents spend 22% of their income on full-time childcare, more than double the average for western economies.

The birthrate in England and Wales peaked in 1964 when the number of children per woman averaged 2.93. Last year it was 1.58, well below the 2.1 replacement level needed to keep the population rate stable, and in Scotland it was even lower at 1.29.

In a report, Baby Bust and Baby Boom: Examining the Liberal Case for Pronatalism, the SMF said this would ultimately lead to a shortage of working-age adults.

“Pronatalism” is the policy or practice of encouraging the bearing of children, especially through government support of a higher birthrate.

“At present, there are a little under three over-65s for every 10 workers, but by the middle of the next decade that ratio will rise to 3.5, and by the 2060s the number will be closing in on four,” the report said.

In the fantasy world painted by the media, we’re filling our countries with a diverse selection of tribespeople because making babies is one of those jobs that white people don’t want to do.

In the real world, however, this dire white birthrate situation is what the rulers wanted and what they worked so hard for. They’ve been working with the media for decades to achieve this. It is insane to expect them to adopt policies to fight their own plans.

You cannot fix declining birthrates without undoing women’s “liberation.”

The only thing these baby machines should be producing is babies, but they’re getting distracted with PowerPoint presentations.

The New York Times published an opinion piece by two economics professors, Melissa S. Kearney and Phillip B. Levine, that looks into some of the causes and consequences of the declining birth rates.

New York Times:

The Covid-19 pandemic has thrown the country into an economic recession and an unprecedented restructuring of our work and social lives. Early on, some likened the public health crisis to a blizzard, imagining that people would stay home, cozy up with their romantic partners and make babies.

These playful visions have given way to a more sobering reality: The pandemic’s serious disruption of people’s lives is likely to cause “missing births” — potentially a lot of them. Add these missing births to the country’s decade-long downward trend in annual births and we can expect consequential changes to our economy and society in the years to come. Unfortunately, there are no easy fixes.

(“Unfortunately, there are no easy fixes”? What? The easy fix is to incentive marriage and children, and disincentivize divorce and infertility. The government is already printing trillions of dollars, why not give some to couples who have kids?)

Research we did last year showed that the Covid pandemic would lead to a decline in U.S. births of about 8 percent, as compared with the number of expected births without a pandemic, resulting in 300,000 fewer births this year than would otherwise be expected. This prediction was based largely on the fact that economic factors affect people’s decisions about whether and when to have a baby.

…

School closures, public-gathering limits and social-distancing mandates are also likely to have an effect. Millions of parents are dealing with the stress of combining their work responsibilities with the need to supervise and teach their children who no longer attend school five days a week. This raises the “cost” of rearing children and can be expected to lead to fewer siblings being conceived this year.

Moreover, restrictions on social activities also mean some relationships that would have started in 2020 (and might have led to babies someday) never took root. We have no precedent to estimate changes in birthrates from these disruptions, but they will undoubtedly also contribute to a large reduction in overall births.

Recent data confirms the likelihood of a sizable “baby bust.” Surveys conducted this summer revealed that couples were intentionally putting their pregnancy plans on hold and having sex less often. Google searches for pregnancy-related terms, such as pregnancy tests, were down. Averted conceptions starting with the pandemic’s arrival in March 2020 would show up as missing births starting in December 2020. Official birth data from the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics will not be available for many more months, but some states have already released provisional birth data. In January 2021, which would be the first month in which all full-term babies born were conceived after the lockdown began, births fell by 7.2 percent in Florida and 10.5 percent in California, after adjusting for secular trends, seasonal variation and the use of provisional birth data.

…

In the absence of effective policies to meaningfully increase births, the most reliable and immediate way to shore up the U.S. population is through immigration, which brings its own political and social challenges. To maintain economic growth without immigration to offset the decline in births, we would need an increase in the share of working-age individuals employed or an increase in the productivity of workers, or both. But both employment rates and productivity have also been falling. Turning things around will require a significant investment of public resources to improve our country’s economic competitiveness.

The declining birthrate has been an issue for years, and the pandemic has pushed it into overdrive. This is likely to have demographic, social and economic implications for many years to come.

Every incentive now is to push down the white birth rate, and replace whites with nonwhites.

Do you think nonwhites are not having kids because of a fake virus? Blacks and Mexicans?

Of course they are.

The people that are skipping having kids are the people who plan to have kids, which are overwhelmingly going to be white. This is 300,000 fewer white babies.

This is just another very convenient coincidental result of the “pandemic.”

Earlier this month, the BBC declared the fact that everyone stopped breeding a crisis. Now, scientists have found a “brain switch” in mice that controls the urge to have sex, and can be used to supercharge their sexual drive.

I am confident that if we connect the dots here, we’ll find a solution.

Daily Mail:

Two types of brain cell have been found in mice which control aggression levels and sexual desire.

The cells are involved in allowing two regions of the brain – the posterior amygdala and the hypothalamus – to communicate.

A study from New York University found that interfering with these pathways significantly alters mouse behaviour.

It is hoped the findings of the research could lead to future treatments for people with psychiatric disorders.

The scientists took 100 male mice and observed their levels of mounting and fighting and tracked their neural signals.

MPN-signaling cells were most active during sex, while VMHvl-signaling cells were most active during confrontations with other males.

The researchers then suppressed and amplified the neural activity of these cells to see the role they played in behaviour.

When so-called MPN-signaling cells in the amygdala were prevented from sending a message to the hypothalamus, mice suddenly became less interested in mating.

Whereas when VMHvl-signaling cells were blocked from sending messages to the hypothalamus from the amygdala, the mice become far less aggressive.

When MPN signals were amplified instead of squashed, male mice became sexually supercharged and pursued unresponsive females in a desperate bid to mate.

The scientists activated THE RAPE SWITCH.

Someone — probably Elon Musk — should figure out how to do that on humans through some drug and put the stuff in the water supply as a public health measure. The government already puts stuff in the water supply as a public health measure. Water fluoridation may be a polemic subject, but it’s done in the name of public health.

Declining birthrates are a public health crisis, but we can solve it through the mass activation of THE RAPE SWITCH.

Imagine waking up, making some coffee using tap water, and just as you’re about to finish your first cup, feeling the insurmountable urge to RAPE. All men will feel the unbearable Need For Rape. They won’t care about contraception, and they certainly won’t care about the possibility of hearing “no.”

The solution to every problem has long been rape.

Now we have a chance to implement it.

The defining value of Western society in the modern age has been anti-natalism. The end result of all of the social changes since the end of World War Two has been a reduction of the birthrate.

Feminism is the main driver of this. Telling women to go to college instead of getting married was likely the single most bizarre decision any society has ever made. We have embraced free love, which allows women to have as many sexual partners as they want without being socially stigmatized, and we have created scientific birth control technologies, from the pill to abortion, which allow women to avoid pregnancy while they engage in this sexual decadence.

Beyond that, we have a materialist paradigm which values wealth and experiences over family. We’ve created a new normal of material wealth that is expected of people, while also creating a debt bubble which makes it impossible for young people to own homes.

The establishment’s solution to this low fertility – created by the paradigm that the establishment forced on society – has been to replace the native white population of America with foreign people who have a higher birthrate due to not having feminism.

Daily Mail:

The number of babies born in the US fell to its lowest level in 35 years in 2019, according to a preliminary report.

The decline is the latest sign of a prolonged national ‘baby bust’ that’s been going on for more than a decade.

Some experts believe the coronavirus pandemic and its impact on the economy will suppress the numbers even further in 2020 and years to come.

‘This unpredictable environment, and anxiety about the future, is going to make women think twice about having children,’ said Dr Denise Jamieson, chair of obstetrics and gynecology at Emory University.

What they’re saying here — even if they don’t mean it — is that white people will think twice about having children.

The only people who would avoid having babies due to economic stress are white people. Brown and black people in third world countries full of poverty never stop reproducing, and they won’t stop reproducing just because they live in America.

But other experts say its possible that birth rates will rise as a result of the pandemic, which has made it more difficult for women to access birth control and abortions.

The latest numbers were released Wednesday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The report, which is considered preliminary, is based on a review of  99.96 percent of birth certificates issued last year.

The CDC found the number of births fell about one percent from 2018, to about 3.7 million. Birth rates continued to fall for teen moms and for women in their 20s.

American women are now projected to have about 1.71 children over their lifetimes – down one percent from 2018 (1.73) and below the rate of 2.1 needed to exactly replace a generation.

Maybe the total collapse of the economy will make people think differently about having kids. Maybe feminism will be damaged so badly that women stop believing they can go on an infinite sexual adventure until they hit 27. Maybe women will need men to provide and that will lead to men being in control of relationships and they will use that control to form stable families.

Or maybe the government will ban all non-sterile sex and start issuing reproductive licenses. They’ve already taken most of your rights and they’re acting as if the Constitution didn’t exist. It isn’t far fetched to think that they’ll ban “non-essential” babies from being made. After all, they’ve already banned “non-essential” workers from working, they’ve banned people from leaving their homes for anything other than essential shopping, and they’ve banned human contact.

Things are highly likely to get weirder.

Andrew Anglin contributed to this report. 

Viktor Orban, Prime Minister of Hungary.

No, no, no, and no. They’re doing it all wrong!

This isn’t how you fix your birthrates, Hungary. You have to import infinite brown refugees from third world shitholes and put them all on welfare hoping they’ll one day learn the language so they’ll understand you when you tell them they have to work to pay your people’s pensions.

I thought we were all on the same page with that.

Daily Mail:

Mothers with four children will be exempt from income tax and will receive £7,000 towards the cost of a new car in an attempt by Hungary to boost its birth rate. 

The country’s prime minister Viktor Orban announced the measures during his annual state of the nation address yesterday.

Mr Orban, who was elected for a third consecutive term in April, said the initiative is meant to ‘ensure the survival of the Hungarian nation‘, adding: ‘This is the Hungarians’ answer, not immigration.’ 

That’s it Hungary, I’m calling the whole European Union. I’ll tell Mama Merkel you’ve been a very bad goy and we’ll put some economic sanctions or… we’ll think of something. Just wait and see.

The benefits include a lifetime personal income tax exemption for women who give birth and raise at least four children.

A subsidy of 2.5 million forints (£6,821) will also be available towards the purchase of a seven-seat vehicle for families with three or more children.

The country will also offer a low-interest loan of 10 million forints (£27,286) for women under the age of 40 who are marrying for the first time.

Seven-seat vehicles sound so good, man. Big families, big vehicles, fun family road trips on the weekends, growing up with siblings, and being happy.

Imagine how much more we can accomplish if we remove incentives for whores to destroy families and we start providing incentives for them to create and take care of families.

‘We have to understand that the European peoples have come to a historical crossroads,’ Mr Orban said.

‘Those who decide in favour of immigration and migrants, no matter why they do so, are in fact creating a country with a mixed population.’

Europe’s left-wing has become ‘the gravedigger of nations, the family and the Christian way of life’, Mr Orban said.

It’s so nice to see there’s still politicians with balls ready to call things for what they are and defend their people instead of foreigners.

After his speech, several hundred members and supporters of Hungary’s main opposition parties held an anti-Orban rally in Buda Castle.

How can you be against what he said? He’s just saying Hungary is for the Hungarian people, which is a no-brainer. If Hungary is missing people, the logical thing to do is ask the Hungarian people to reproduce, not to flood Hungary with non-Hungarians.

Still, the deed’s done. Hungary is getting more Hungarians.

Why are we not doing something like that too?

I have lived all my life so far without expecting a pension,and I suggest the rest of you do the same, and have kids instead to take care of you

It seems like bringing society back to normalcy – and to be clear, not reproducing at ABOVE replacement rate is completely abnormal – isn’t that hard when authorities actually try.

Our race mapped the entire planet, invented virtually all modern technology, put a man on the moon – but for some reason, we’re being told over and over that we can’t figure out how to have enough kids…

But somehow, some small town in Japan managed to do it.

The Economist:

A PATCHWORK of nondescript houses nestled at the foot of a mountain, Nagicho looks like an ordinary Japanese town. On closer inspection, something extraordinary marks it out: babies. Yuki Fukuda is one of many local mothers with three children. The bump under her winter coat indicates that another is on the way, part of a baby bonanza that has seen the town’s fertility rate double since 2005.

A woman with 4 kids… In Japan… In CURRENT YEAR…

That’s gotta be some kind of record.

Not surprisingly, reporters have flocked to this remote corner of the country to see if there is something that promotes fecundity in the water flowing down from Mount Nagi. The cause appears to be more prosaic: economics. Alarmed by the dearth of children, the local government increased incentives to have babies. The fertility rate rose from 1.4 (meaning that the average woman will have 1.4 children in her lifetime, roughly the national rate) to 2.8 in 2014. Provisional figures suggest the rate has since fallen back to 1.9, but even if correct, that remains well above the national average.

But why didn’t they just import niggers from niggerland?

Are they some kind of yerrow Nazis?

Mrs Fukuda will receive a “celebratory” gift of ¥300,000 ($2,682) when she gives birth. Asubsidised baby-sitting service is available for just ¥1,800 a day, along with subsidised carseats and other baby accessories.When her children reach secondary school, she will receive ¥90,000 a year for each one who attends. In theory, this stipend is to cover the cost of getting children to school, especially for people who live relatively far away. And whereas usually all but the poorest and the old in Japan have to pay 30% of their health-care bills (with the national government picking up the rest), in Nagicho the local government pays the 30% for children.

In other words – this Jap town is giving Japs almost as much as western European governments give to Somalis and Pakis and Arabs and other invader vermin.

It didn’t even cross their minds to multiculturalize themselves to death.

Other initiatives are more creative. The town relies on a network of volunteers to help keep its two nurseries open.Businesses that move to the town receive rent-free land—a gesture that has lured at least three companies since 2014, says Yoshitaka Kumagai, a local government official. The city is also offering a clutch of refurbished or newly built apartments and houses for rent at subsidised rates.

Can you imagine trying to make a nursery with volunteers in the Western world today?

Kikes, Moslems, trannies and faggots would form a line a kilometer long just to volunteer for some time with your babies and toddlers.

And it’s not like you could discriminate against them or anything, that would be worse that anything the filthy vermin would do to them.

It’s as if (((someone))) is trying to make us as disgusted and demoralized as possible

Mr Kumagai insists all this largesse has merely boosted the share of the town’s ¥4bn annual budget devoted to raising the fertility rate from 2% to 3%. Like thousands of other shrinking communities across Japan, the town was desperate, he says. Nagicho has lost a third of its population since 1955, and a third of the 6,100 residents who remain are over 65. “We’re trying to hold the line at 6,000 people,” he says.

So not only did they not have to flood their country with subhumans – it didn’t even cost that much in the first place.

Keep in mind – there are many White countries much wealthier than Japan, and yet none of their governments ever seem to find money for anything other than welfare for subhumans and welfare for  Israel.

Could Nagicho be replicated elsewhere? Hiroko Kaihara, who moved to the town years ago with her three children and works in one of the nurseries, thinks not. There is a slowness to life that is attractive, she says, and a sense of community.“Mothers feel safe having more children; it’s not easy to create those conditions.” Mrs Fukuda says she also struggles to put her finger on why families are larger. The money helps, she admits, but that is not the main reason. Perhaps there is something in the water after all.

Money helps, yes, but I’ll tell what helps even more.

1. No diversity

Diversity, of any kind, is bad. I’m not just talking about the obvious problems with bringing in less primates from Africa and the Middle East and pretending they’re human beings.

If you dropped twenty million Chinks and Japs in Europe, they won’t do that^, or live on welfare, or run trucks through crowds of people or gang-rape girls in the hundreds of thousands. But their very presence would be devastating to European societies, for the simple fact that a society cannot function without a high degree of homogeneity.

We’ve all lived in (((diversity))) for so long, that we forget that throughout history, most people lived almost their entire lives with minimal contact with people who weren’t extended family.

When you met a group of foreigners, it was usually in a context of an invading force.

So even with people of the same race, living in the same country or city, there has to be some degree of separation, or else society as a whole can’t function.

This used to be the case in most countries, especially in America, which was made up by people from all across Europe who all had their own neighborhoods until (((someone))) started socially engineering them into oblivion.

E. Michael Jones has a good video about this:

He’s wrong on some things, but the video is still worth watching

2. Cheap Housing

This one is actually much easier than it sounds. Housing costs a lot today in most White countries (even relatively poor ones in eastern Europe) because foreigners can buy them, which should not be permitted under any circumstances.

The other problem, which affects America and western Europe the most, is the (((diversity))) I mentioned earlier. Basically, the subhumans turn not only the places they live, but the places around where they live, into shitholes, and so that limits the places where you can safely raise a family, which in turn raises real estate prices in the White/livable areas.

Finally, there’s the fact that most jobs are concentrated in cities, and people want to live where there are more jobs. This can easily be fixed by better infrastructure, as well as by new inventions – flying cars, hoverbikes, etc. for which the technology already exists.

3. Getting Rid of Kike Media Control

“Goyim, did you know your clothes are made by brown slave children and you should feel bad about it?”

“Goyim, did you know everything you do every day is killing the earth?”

“Goyim, did you know you’re a vile hateful monster who oppresses everything around for no reason?”

“Shiksas, did you know your men are oppressing you and the only way to be free is to shave your head and fuck a schwartza?”

“Goyim, did you know that by reproducing, you’re basically doing the most horrible thing you could ever do because it perpetuates all the other slightly less horrible things that are still really really horrible?”

Jewish control of the media has harmed us more than anything else, and if you haven’t gotten rid of your cable/netflix/whatever yet, you’re basically a moron.

You can’t win a war if all you do all day is stare at enemy propaganda, which is exactly what the entirety of the formerly-Western media is today.

Like with all the previous points, and almost every other problem you have in your life, it all comes down to getting rid of the kikes.

Then all the other problems can be easily fixed.

I feel a bit awkward writing this article because I know its content is probably obvious to many. At the same time, I also feel it still may be important to point these things out. I don’t know how many White nationalists actually think that we need to “have more White children” to save our race, because it is hard to gauge that just by comment sections and the like, but it is doubtless that some do, and they are very confident about this assertion. I understand why, but my contention is that they just haven’t thought this point of view through, and so I will try and lay out my argument against it. Of course, I am more than open to counter-arguments, but I think this will be pretty conclusive.

Indeed, having White children is oftentimes even presented as the solution to our racial crisis, such as:

“White people keep complaining about White genocide, but they aren’t having children. START HAVING WHITE BABIES PEOPLE ITS THAT SIMPLE.”

Or similar such statements. Now this is ridiculous if taken literally. How are White children going to save us, or even help us at this point? These people act like white nationalist children are going to goose step out of the womb and start rounding up non-Whites, locking down our borders and executing traitors.

It’s obviously the other way around, my friends.

We adults need to fix this world now so there is a viable future for our children in the first place. If retreating to the woods and raising children properly makes you feel as you are doing something for the future of our race, I hate to break it to you, but you’re really not. In fact, if you do that, you’ll have to hope others pull off a revolution, so there is even a habitable world for your White children in existence when they grow up.

Not to mention that it’s impossible to outbreed the non-Whites. Nationalists will only always be a small percentage of our race, so attempting to have a lot of White babies, even if we were many times our current number, would only slightly bring up the overall average. If we had the numbers to really make a difference in that regard, than we wouldn’t have to worry about it, because we would have victory in short order. We would be able to march on Rome and snatch the keys to our people’s destiny right out of our treasonous leaders’ hands.

It’s similar to the tax protestors futile argument about not paying taxes. They will say “if ten million people quit paying their taxes tomorrow what could they do, arrest us all?” like that is some kind of brilliant revelation. Obviously to do that ten million people would have to be organized first to carry out a coordinated effort, otherwise individually not paying taxes will have no effect at all, except getting individual people thrown into jail. Ten million people organized would have the power to begin forcing a reform. Top down problems are solved at the top, and that is what our focus should be: toppling the whole bloody system so we can rebuild it in a way that serves our people as a whole.

The ‘have more children’ argument just seems like a very simple-minded, knee jerk, emotional reaction (‘non-Whites are outbreeding us, therefore we must breed more – problem solved!’) to a much more complicated issue. The root of the issue, as has been pointed out frequently in recent days, is the introduction and acceptance of feminism in western society, and the subsequent emasculation of White men resulting from it.

Would proud, masculine White men allow their women to copulate with monkeys right in front of their faces?

Would proud, masculine White men allow our enemies to use the excuse that ” we are not breeding enough, therefore we should allow millions of non-Whites to come and take over our country”?

Would our enemies even have the ‘chutzpah’ to try something so insane on a proud, masculine people?

If the 700 million or so White children who have already been born can’t stop the imminent genocide we are facing, what good will more of them do? Do we even deserve for our race to survive in this current state? Are we even worthy of White children after we have failed so thoroughly? Why should they suffer because we are so pathetic?

A White race 700 million strong could dominate the entire planet with its hands tied behind its back if it were again in control of its own destiny.

Let’s keep in mind the one fact that the Jews work around the clock to try and hide from us: 80 million White people, freed from Jewish control and under proper leadership, almost conquered the world. Hitler came to power in Germany and simply dismantled Jewish influence in banking and media, and issued debt free currency backed by the hard work of the White German people, and this turned Germany into the world’s foremost superpower in a very short time while the rest of the world was still in a depression. They then proceeded to fight a war against basically the entire world and almost won.

Hitler never had children but he took control of Germany and then instituted policies that facilitated a massive increase of them. So he was responsible for millions of German babies, without actually having had any himself. Likewise, If White men today regain control of our people’s destiny – and this will probably be done by a very small percentage of them – they could then do the same and be indirectly responsible for the revival and survival of the White race, whether or not they individually had children or not.

And I’m tired of this argument being used as a weapon, virtually unchallenged. It’s often claimed that persons with pro-White views that don’t have White children have no authority to speak on any pro-White issues, like they’re some kind of hypocrites for doing so. Could you imagine one of Hitler’s contemporaries claiming he had no right to be a nationalist leader because he didn’t have any children? I imagine such a person would’ve received a plethora of perplexed looks before they were bounced out of the beer hall for being a ridiculous weirdo.

I even came across an article attacking William Pierce the other day for allegedly having a vasectomy and thus not living up to his idea of a White future populated by White people. William Pierce! Right, if he would’ve just had a few more kids, who he never would’ve had time to even pay any attention to anyway, considering he worked about 16 hours a day, 7 days a week, trying to build a pro-White media empire and ignite a White revolution, he would’ve done much more for the cause. And the time and money he would’ve had to spend on parental duties would’ve been much better spent than him working on waking up untold thousands of people who otherwise might not be on our side today, right? After all, his children would’ve been White children, and boy do we ever need a lot more of those.

I do want to make it clear that I am not out to discourage anyone from having white children though. In fact, I encourage that. I even consider it a biological duty if one manages to find a good White woman – but that should go without saying.

I also want to make it clear that there’s only one reason for me thinking that White nationalists should have children, and it’s not because I think birth rates have any relevance whatsoever to the solution of our current predicament, it’s because they should pass on their good genes.

Those who are resilient enough to be able to climb out of the mountains of anti-White propaganda that has been shoveled on them their whole life are gems to our people, and as such should be multiplied as much as possible, so that if or when we do secure a future for our race, it will be all the more healthy and better off for it.

But, I also believe that it’s mainly just women who sympathize with our cause and wish to contribute to White nationalism who should worry about having White children, not men. A child could even potentially hold a man back in the coming and current battle, as I have already alluded.

Understanding the 14 words.

The 14 words are, to the best of my knowledge, universally agreed upon as the overriding ideology of all pro-Whites, no matter what disagreements there may be between them on other matters, large or small. In fact I’m sure of it.

The 14 Words are thus:

We Must Secure the Existence of Our People and a Future for White Children

Many people somehow interpret this as meaning we should all be having White children. Some even use it to brag by insinuating that since they have had more White children than someone else, they have done more toward the 14 Words than the other. How securing a future for White children and simply impregnating a woman a bunch of times gets conflated is unclear.

The 14 Words were created by the legendary White nationalist David Lane, and as such it may be instructive to explain what he most likely had in mind when he invented the brilliant little propaganda bomb.

Lane emphatically took the position that a people absolutely needs its own exclusive living space in order to survive, and that it was up to White men to secure this living space for the White race at all costs. He also believed that nature is brutal and that our women must be under our thumb or they will flock to non-Whites, and rightfully so, since we will no longer be strong enough to offer them and their children the protection they need.

His book K D Rebel is about a White racist community that has secured territory outside of the U.S. The men go on missions into the U.S. and kidnap pretty White women and then indoctrinate them into becoming traditional White wives/mothers. They take multiple wives this way, impregnate them, and then literally force them to act like proper White women, which they are in short order much happier with then when they were living in Judaized America.

So White people having a lot of babies was clearly only a concern to David Lane for after we have secured our own territory.

All of David Lane’s writings can be found here.

The Raising Your Children Racialist Theory

I’ve also come to believe that the concept of having children and raising them racialist is basically a myth. I could be wrong on this, as I am just going by what I have observed and my experiences interacting with other racialists. I’ve asked around about this quite a bit and not only was everybody I asked not raised that way, they also had never met anyone who was. Most people seem to have started with 9/11 conspiracy theories and then made their way to racialism from there, including myself.

If the raising your children racialist theory is accurate then where are the millions of White people who were born to White racists of previous generations? They should be on the front lines with us now, right? The racists who were fighting against forced busing and forced integration in America in the 60s, and who watched the Blacks burn down hundreds of cities at that time, certainly wouldn’t be surprised to see Ferguson and Baltimore today, would they? Again, where are their children in this fight?

William Pierce’s son disowned him. Don Black’s son disavowed racism. Other racists I know have children who still have a good relationship with them but just simply think their dad’s racist views are some kind of funny quirk with maybe a bit of truth to them. Top racist George Lincoln Rockwell had seven children. His wife left him cold and then married a rich Icelandic business tycoon who, along with their son Björgólfur Thor Björgólfsson – the “first billionaire in Iceland” – plundered that country financially, and were largely responsible for its 2008 economic crash. One of his daughters married a Japanese guy and their son is the famous half-Japanese professional football player Björgólfur Hideaki Takefusa.

In a recent ‘Atlantic Axis’ podcast the host was lamenting the fact that there are not many second or third generation nationalists in British nationalist parties. He assumes this is the fault of nationalists for being lazy and not raising their children right. Is that really the case though, or is this just not as easy a task as many seem to think? I don’t know, but it seems to me that a nationalist would definitely attempt to raise their kids as nationalists. Why wouldn’t they?

And when do you even teach a kid to become racialist/nationalist, I’ve wondered. It sounds like a pretty sticky situation to me. If you indoctrinated them before their brains were mature enough to think critically, then you would have a potential situation where they might go out among normal people and repeat these beliefs without really understanding them and their implications, and becoming pariahs. How long before they realize that what you are teaching them to believe is considered by the vast majority of the entire world to be the most evil thoughts anyone could ever possibly think? Imagine the pressure. It doesn’t take a whole lot of contemplation to figure out why the ‘Prussian Blue’ twins went from Nazi pop singers to pot-smoking hippie liberals. Is anybody actually surprised by this?

Please let us know in the comment section if you were raised as a nationalist, and whether or not you know or have met a lot of other nationalists who were. I think this topic needs to be explored further, and I can only base my opinion on the limited amount of knowledge that I have acquired thus far.

We Need Total Dedication

All of this probably sounds pretty negative, and that’s not my intention. My intention is to make White men understand the gravity of our situation and where the responsibility for correcting it lies, which is on our shoulders. Comforting ourselves by just having children, or wasting valuable time and energy trying to find a good woman in order to have children to feel like you are doing your part for the 14 Words is folly, in my opinion.

And again, I am not against having White children, I just don’t think it is as much of a priority as many seem to think it is, and believe the idea is quite possibly just a distraction at this point.

So this article is not as much intended to discourage people from having children as it is to encourage White men to get their head in the game and realize the direness of our situation and to highlight what it is going to take to win, which is total dedication. No comfort in future generations, no half-measures, but full fight. Our people are on the whole weak, degenerated, confused and even pitted against us. Our women are out of control, and our enemies openly mock and despise us, although deep down they do fear us.

Public opinion is starting to turn in our favor. And it’s doing that not only because the world is so insane that it is pushing people in our direction – though that is a big part – it is because of White nationalists who have been working tirelessly to spread our message as far and wide as possible. We will continue to make strides in the near future, no doubt, but the harder we work, the longer those strides will be.

We are the pinnacle of millions of years of evolution and the warriors on the front lines of the final battle of all of civilization, and there will be no replacement if we fail, no pulling ourselves up after this, and no second chance. This is the highest honor that could ever be bestowed on us. We can either make history, or be erased and condemned and mocked by it – and the clock is ticking.