Sometimes, I feel like just finding a random tweet from some rando tweeter and saying “some say.”

I Call Bullshit…

The Boeing Whistleblower, John Barnett, Wrote a Suicide Note… before He “Supposedly” shot himself in the Head

Looks like a first grader wrote this shit…

What the note Says:
• I can’t do this any Longer!!! Enough!!
• F*ck Boeing!!!
• Family & Friends I… pic.twitter.com/qI5e1GYVfo

— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) May 18, 2024

I’m just joking. I don’t really like doing that. Elvis Dunderhoff does though.

I think maybe some people haven’t been around boomers and don’t know that this is how they write.

As far as I can tell, this suicide makes perfect sense. This is exactly what you would write if someone dug up some horrible embarrassing dirt on you and told you they were going to release it if you didn’t kill yourself.

New York Post:

In the moments before he apparently shot himself through the left temple, Boeing whistleblower John Barnett sat in the front seat of his orange Dodge Ram truck and scrawled his final thoughts into a notebook.

“I can’t do this any longer! Enough!” he wrote, according to a suicide note obtained by The Post. “F— Boeing.”

“America,” he continued “Come together or die!! I pray the motherf—that destroyed my life pay!!! I pray Boeing pays!!! Bury me face down so Boeing and their lying-ass leaders can kiss my ass.”

Authorities say they have authenticated the handwriting as belonging to Barnett. Only his fingerprints were found on the notebook.

In the letter, Barnett also sends missives to his loved ones.

“To my family and friends, I found my purpose,” he wrote. “I’m at peace. I love you more.”

Barnett was a quality control engineer who worked for Boeing for more than three decades before retiring in 2017.

During his tenure, he says he had raised a great deal of safety complaints to his bosses which he says were unheeded, particulrlay when he worked at the company’s Charleston plant. Barnett claimed his bosses then retaliated against him and put him in a largely administrateive role.

Two years later, he told the BBC Boeing cut corners by rushing to get its 787 Dreamliner jets off the production line and into service.

…

Barnett was found dead on the morning of March 9 after he failed to show up for the third day of depositions about Boeing’s safety practices. His lawyers and family have questioned the circumstances around the shooting, and said he didn’t seem despondent in the days leading up to the alleged suicide.

The suicide note was released by the Charleston Police Department, who have closed their investigation into his death, concluding he took his own life.

Going into someone’s truck and shooting them in the head and then leaving a fake suicide note is sort of logistically absurd. Just think about it for three seconds.

Every cop involved with the investigation is working for Boeing?

People have secrets. Someone also could have threatened his family. It’s much easier to give someone a reason to kill themselves than to actually kill them.

That said, clearly he didn’t just up and randomly decide to kill himself. It’s absurd that the cops are taking this at face value.

Maybe they do all work for Boeing.

BREAKING: Second Boeing whistleblower dies suddenly after a struggle with a ‘fast-spreading infection’

Joshua Dean, 44, was declared dead on Tuesday, nearly two months after the death of Boeing whistleblower John Barnett

Dean’s aunt said that Dean went to a hospital in Wichita,… pic.twitter.com/qUvqD6kVz5

— Unlimited L’s (@unlimited_ls) May 2, 2024

Is Boeing really murdering whistleblowers?

That seems almost too extreme to believe.

New York Post:

A Boeing whistleblower who raised concerns about one of the carrier’s suppliers ignoring production defects died suddenly on Tuesday — just two months after another employee who sounded the alarm about the embattled company died by alleged suicide.

Joshua Dean, 45, a former quality auditor at Spirit AeroSystems, died Tuesday morning from a fast-growing mystery infection, the Seattle Times reported.

Dean, of Wichita, Kan., had reportedly been in good health until about two weeks ago, when he was admitted to the hospital, the outlet reported.

However, by April 21 he was in “very critical condition,” and had tested positive for influenza B, MRSA, and pneumonia, the outlet said.

He was intubated and put on dialysis before eventually being airlifted to another hospital in Oklahoma City.

A CT scan indicated that he had also suffered a stroke.

This one is actually a lot less suspicious than the first. These seem like basic vax symptoms.

Depending on how you view it, that could also count as Boeing murdering him:

But that’s a bit different than murdering a whistleblower and making it look like suicide.

I don’t know how you give a guy a stroke that leads to extreme infection. Well, I do know how – it’s with a fake vaccine.

Otherwise… it seems unlikely to me.

Maybe if Boeing put more money into hiring actual engineers they could finally get rid of their hit squad department. 😂 pic.twitter.com/PTq6zFrQcO

— PUBLORD (@publordhodl) May 2, 2024

Maybe the first one was a real suicide. Who knows. It’s possible. It seemed really sketchy to me. But it’s possible.

It’s also possible that Boeing is hiring diversity at the higher levels and some woman or black decided to have a guy whacked. The woman would be like “well then, we’ll have to kill him” and the black would be like “we gone do dat nigga dirty.”

President Putin has granted Russian citizenship to former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, who leaked thousands of classified documents online in 2013 and is wanted by the U.S. on espionage charges. He faces up to 30 years if convicted. pic.twitter.com/SLlEpDSEdP

— CBS Evening News (@CBSEveningNews) September 26, 2022

MORE – U.S. State Department says Mr. Snowden should return to the United States to face justice. pic.twitter.com/4mWRqQbKur

— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) September 26, 2022

I thought this already happened, but okay. I don’t really care about this guy either way. He’s said some cucked stuff.

The Guardian:

Vladimir Putin signed a decree on Monday granting Russian citizenship to the US whistleblower Edward Snowden.

Snowden, 39, a former US intelligence contractor, has been living in Russia since 2013 to escape prosecution in the US after leaking secret files, published by the Guardian, that revealed vast domestic and international surveillance operations carried out by the US National Security Agency.

In 2020, Snowden said that he and his then-pregnant wife were applying for Russian citizenship in order not to be separated from their future son in an era of pandemics and closed borders. Russia granted him permanent residency rights the same year, paving the way for him to obtain Russian citizenship.

“After years of separation from our parents, my wife and I have no desire to be separated from our sons,” Snowden, whose name appeared on a list of 72 foreign-born individuals for whom Putin was granting citizenship, said on Monday. “After two years of waiting and nearly ten years of exile, a little stability will make a difference for my family. I pray for privacy for them—and for us all.”

Putin’s decree to grant Snowden citizenship quickly led to quips on social media that the whistleblower will soon be conscripted into the Russian army to fight in Ukraine as part of the country’s nationwide mobilisation campaign.

“Will Snowden be mobilised?” wrote Margarita Simonyan, the editor-in-chief of the state-owned broadcaster RT on her Telegram channel.

Snowden’s Russian lawyer Anatoly Kucherena told the state news agency Ria Novosti that his client could not be drafted because he has not previously served in the Russian armed forces. The lawyer added that Snowden’s wife, Lindsay Mills, was also applying for Russian citizenship.

Never forget: Edward Snowden.

Oh, another “whistleblower” saying there isn’t enough censorship on the internet?

Strange…

The Guardian:

Facebook faced mounting pressure on Friday after a new whistleblower accused it of knowingly hosting hate speech and illegal activity, even as leaked documents shed further light on how the company failed to heed internal concerns over election misinformation.

Allegations by the new whistleblower, who spoke to the Washington Post, were reportedly contained in a complaint to the Securities and Exchange Commission, the US agency that handles regulation to protect investors in publicly traded companies.

In the complaint, the former employee detailed how Facebook officials frequently declined to enforce safety rules for fear of angering Donald Trump and his allies or offsetting the company’s huge growth. In one alleged incident, Tucker Bounds, a Facebook communications official, dismissed concerns about the platform’s role in 2016 election manipulation.

“It will be a flash in the pan,” Bounds said, according to the affidavit, as reported by the Post. “Some legislators will get pissy. And then in a few weeks they will move on to something else. Meanwhile, we are printing money in the basement, and we are fine.”

Washington Post:

The whistleblower told The Post of an occasion in which Facebook’s Public Policy team, led by former Bush administration official Joel Kaplan, defended a “white list” that exempted Trump-aligned Breitbart News, run then by former White House strategist Stephen K. Bannon, and other select publishers from Facebook’s ordinary rules against spreading false news reports.

When a person in the video conference questioned this policy, Kaplan, the vice president of global policy, responded by saying, “Do you want to start a fight with Steve Bannon?” according to the whistleblower in The Post interview.

It was obvious from the recently leaked Facebook blacklist that there had to be an accompanying whitelist. The list did not contain Ben Shapiro, Ezra Levant, Paul Joseph Watson, or other known “controlled opposition” shills. If it was just up to the regular Facebook censorship staff, they would put those people on the blacklist, because they have zero understanding of the nature of politics, and think Andrew Anglin and Ben Shapiro are indistinguishable “white supremacist neo-Nazis.”

Facebook clearly wants as much traffic as they can get, but there are also Jews like Kaplan behind the scenes leading people to Jewish or otherwise controlled content. (Paul Joseph Watson went on a trip, probably paid for by the State Department, to promote/assist Antifa riots in Hong Kong.)

These whistleblowers are of course pushing for the government to come in and regulate content on social media. However, when all is said and done, I have a feeling you’re still going to have Ben Shapiro at the top of every Republican’s feed.

Today, Glenn Greenwald had a good Twitter thread about the previous whistleblower, which also applies to this new one (who is pushing the same agenda, and presumably backed by the same interests).

The leaders of the movement in the US to impose more corporate and state censorship on the internet – to make the internet less free and more subject to centralized control – are employees of media corporations who have been given the job title "journalist."

Surreal and twisted.

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) October 23, 2021

The US epicenter of the repressive and toxic movement to destroy the free internet and impose more centralized control over political speech:

* The tech "reporting"unit of the NYT

* The "disinformation" team of NBC

* The "media reporting" sector of CNN (and CNN generally).

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) October 23, 2021

The campaign centered on this FB "whistleblower" is financed and coordinated by the same handful of billionaires who have been seeking to control the internet for years.

It's a giant scam to create a climate where people want *criminal* sanctions for allowing "disinformation"

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) October 23, 2021

This scam of the FB "whistleblower" and her billionaire patrons is perfectly timed for the debate in the UK over a bill to *criminalize those who allow "disinformation" and "extremism" to be heard, determined by these billionaires. Right & left in unison:https://t.co/6LVCln5S4W pic.twitter.com/BDr19BdydY

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) October 23, 2021

It’s possible that Facebook itself is sending these fake whistleblowers out. They might want to remove the responsibility from themselves for their own censorship.

It seems clear that this is what Twitter wants.

Related: Twitter “Admits” Algorithm Favors Right-Wing Figures More Than Leftist Content

But it doesn’t matter – as Glenn says, that last bitch was backed by billionaires.

The other thing is this: Facebook wants as much personal information as possible, and if you start banning large segments of the population, you get a lot less data. The other thing is that censorship creates a chilling effect, which makes people less likely to say what they actually believe, which makes the data less accurate and therefore less useful.

Facebook wants to be able to run social simulations based on real data. That is the core value of the company – its ability to get accurate information about the behaviors and desires of real people.

So it’s possible that Facebook really is pushing back against these even more aggressive censorship steps because of what it does to their data collection model, but that other powerful Jews who don’t care as much about Facebook’s data collection want to shut it all down.

Either way: we are clearly looking at a situation where censorship is going to get kicked up a notch in the near future. It’s hard to believe, and hard to even understand what they will censor next, but it’s what is happening.

They will also likely do other forms of censorship, such as the sorts that have been done to this website.

Remember to make sure you have our Tor address saved, in case the normie-web address goes down.

/

We will always be on that address.

You can access it through Brave Browser. If you’re using Brave now, just click on that link, and it should open automatically in a new Tor window.

You can also download Tor Browser.

MAKE SURE you save that link.

I’m serious.

Bookmark it now and write it down on a piece of paper later.

Ay yo, are we sure that they can do this?

I really thought they couldn’t just do this…

Daily Caller:

FBI agents raided the home of a recognized Department of Justice whistleblower who privately delivered documents pertaining to the Clinton Foundation and Uranium One to a government watchdog, according to the whistleblower’s attorney.

The Justice Department’s inspector general was informed that the documents show that federal officials failed to investigate potential criminal activity regarding former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation and Rosatom, the Russian company that purchased Uranium One, a document reviewed by The Daily Caller News Foundation alleges.

OF COURSH!

The delivered documents also show that then-FBI Director Robert Mueller failed to investigate allegations of criminal misconduct pertaining to Rosatom and to other Russian government entities attached to Uranium One, the document reviewed by TheDCNF alleges. Mueller is now the special counsel investigating whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 election.

“The bureau raided my client to seize what he legally gave Congress about the Clinton Foundation and Uranium One,” the whistleblower’s lawyer, Michael Socarras, told TheDCNF, noting that he considered the FBI’s raid to be an “outrageous disregard” of whistleblower protections.

Sixteen agents arrived at the home of Dennis Nathan Cain, a former FBI contractor, on the morning of Nov. 19 and raided his Union Bridge, Maryland, home, Socarras told TheDCNF.

Funny kitties aside, this is indeed spooky and troubling news.

There are supposed to be whistleblower protections in place that allow whistleblowers to come forward and bypass the agencies to directly petition the higher-ups – who in turn are supposed to protect them from getting in trouble with the agencies they are blowing the whistle on.

But this guy ended up being betrayed by the people he blew the whistle to.

The law protects whistleblowers who are government contractors and requires the IG to share such potentially damaging information with the attorney general — who at the time was Jeff Sessions.

Jeff again… completely useless at everything, it turns out.

The two law enforcement officials directed the documents be sent to the Senate and House Intelligence committees for their examination, according to Socarras, who said that a high-level IG official hand-delivered the documents to the the two intelligence committees.

“I cannot believe the Bureau informed the federal magistrate who approved the search warrant that they wanted to search the home of an FBI whistleblower to seize the information that he confidentially disclosed to the IG and Congress,” Socarras told TheDCNF.

The whistleblower act is intended to protect whistleblowers within the intelligence community, which includes the FBI.

Yeah, well the US doesn’t really have a good track record when it comes to whistleblowers, but this is a new low.

“The [intelligence community] is committed to providing its personnel the means to report violations of law,” according to a 2016 intelligence community directive.

“The [whistleblower act] authorizes employees of contractors to take government property and give it to the two intelligence committees confidentially,” Socarras told TheDCNF.

So that’s that then.

The FBI can straight-up break federal law now.

After all, who’s going to stop them – the FBI?

The FBI has yet to talk to Cain’s attorney despite the raid, according to Socarras.

“After the raid, and having received my name and phone number from Mr. Cain as his lawyer, an FBI agent actually called my client directly to discuss his seized electronics,” Socarras told TheDCNF. “Knowingly bypassing the lawyer of a represented client is serious misconduct.”

The Justice Department and the IG both declined to comment.

I had always heard how powerful and connected the Clintons were, but man, seems that they really are untouchable to this day.

So much for locking them up!

If I must confess, I really thought that they were past their prime! Or at the very least, it’s clear that when they were at their prime, they got so many people involved in their schemes that these powerful people are now coming out of the woodwork to defend them from any investigations into their money laundering… and whatever else they were doing.