What we need to do is bring the wars home to America to fight these Democrats and media Jews attempting to steal the election!

RT:

Acting US Defense Secretary Christopher Miller is apparently preparing to withdraw troops from Afghanistan, saying the conflict “isn’t over,” but adding that “all wars must end.”

“This is the critical phase in which we transition our efforts from a leadership to supporting role,” Miller said on Friday in a letter to all Department of Defense employees. “We are not a people of perpetual war. It is the antithesis of everything for which we stand and for which our ancestors fought. All wars must end.”

JUST RELEASED from the acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller: pic.twitter.com/k9VxNTwjb1

— Kristina Wong 🇺🇸 (@kristina_wong) November 14, 2020

The letter came just four days after President Donald Trump fired Defense Secretary Mark Esper and replaced him with Miller, who was previously director of the National Counterterrorism Center. Miller was among four Trump loyalists who replaced top civilian officials at the Pentagon on Monday, just two days after mainstream media outlets declared Democrat Joe Biden the winner of the November 3 election.

Trump is challenging the election results in court, based on allegations of fraud by voters and election officials, but he also appears to be acting with increased urgency to fulfill his 2016 campaign promise of ending the war in Afghanistan, which has now dragged on for 19 years – making it the longest in the history of the US.

This of course doesn’t mean anything if Trump doesn’t stay in office.

The Usurper Joe Biden is surrounding himself with Jewish and Israeli Jew extremists who are planning to redo the post-911 George W. Bush era wars.

I’ve written about all the neocons Biden is trying to bring in. RT published an article yesterday about it.

It will take Biden’s people ten minutes to get the wars going again in Afghanistan or anywhere else.

It is truly an insane thing to see how a senile wench like Nancy Pelosi has once again become the Speaker of the House of Representatives. It honestly defies comprehension how we are witness to such an absurdity. But considering the Jewish circus-tier atmosphere of American politics, it is hard to be surprised by anything.

Since regaining this position she has been saying all sorts of incoherent and weird nonsense that it would be an extremely tedious and difficult task to analyze it all. So in the interest of time, we’ll just analyze a few of the noteworthy comments she has made since reclaiming the gavel.

During an interview with Jane Pauley this past weekend, she openly claimed that President Trump wants to eliminate Congress.

New York Post:

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) suggested in a Sunday sit-down that President Trump would like to “abolish” Congress.

“The impression you get from the president is he would like to not only close government, build a wall, but also abolish Congress, so the only voice that mattered was his own,” Pelosi said in an interview with “CBS Sunday Morning” host Jane Pauley.

It’d be great if she were correct, but there is no sign or proof that President Trump is going to declare martial law and abolish Congress. Not yet at least.

But considering what a failure democracy has proven to be, getting rid of Congress might not be such a bad idea. The reason why so many things are broken is because Congress has refused to implement obvious solutions to obvious problems. The current dispute over border wall funding is just more proof of the gross dysfunction within the legislative branch.

And democracy is theoretically supposed to represent the will of the people right? Well if that’s the case, why has public approval for Congress been so low and for such a long period of time? For most of the past ten years, Congressional job approval has been under 20 percent.

This shows that Congress is not effectively implementing the will of the people. So what is the point of Congress if it is failing to properly represent the people? That’s literally their only job and they have utterly failed at this.

It’s also worth noting that the problem is with both parties. Former Speaker of the House Paul Ryan left Congress with a 12 percent approval rating. That’s even worse than French President Emmanuel Macron’s approval rating and he’s in the midst of trying to suppress a popular revolution against his government.

Pelosi also said that she views a border wall as an “immorality.”

This is the same woman who has supported endless wars for Israel, homosexual marriage and legal abortions. She hardly has standing to lecture us on what is moral and immoral. In fact, her stance against funding a border wall is in and of itself an immoral stance. What’s moral about leaving the American people unprotected from third world savages? She has offered no logical explanation for this ridiculous political position.

Furthermore: what about Israel, Nancy?

Pelosi’s entire political career serves as a textbook example of why women have no business serving in government. Her political views are entirely driven off of emotional gibberish instead of logical decision making. And one can only imagine all the dumb things she’s going to say and do over the next two years. It’s going to be quite an amazing thing to behold.

On this week’s Saturday Night Live, the sickening Jew mutant Pete Davidson mocked Texas Republican Congressional candidate Dan Crenshaw.

Crenshaw is a former Navy SEAL who lost an eye while fighting in Afghanistan.

“This guy is kind of cool — Dan Crenshaw. You may be surprised to hear he’s a Congressional candidate from Texas and not a hitman in a porno movie. I’m sorry, I know he lost his eye in war, or whatever. Whatever,” Davidson said on SNL Saturday.

As it turns out, mocking war veterans for injuries they suffered on the battlefield is not something people are on board with.

NEW: NRCC Statement on SNL's Pete Davidson Mocking War Hero Dan Crenshaw https://t.co/qb9Oj0WjV1 pic.twitter.com/SnR54KZiq1

— NRCC (@NRCC) November 4, 2018

The sad thing is that this sounds more like leftist editorial than anything these days. https://t.co/NbFxuJVZTT

— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) November 4, 2018

The same SNL that was too cowardly to take on Harvey Weinstein mock a wounded war vet:

“I know he lost his eye in war, or whatever lol!” https://t.co/JBd3PpkwW1

— Jason Howerton (@jason_howerton) November 4, 2018

Totally cheap, disgusting and classless of SNL to have Pete Davidson mock Dan Crenshaw for wearing an eye patch…then giggle that he was injured in the line of duty.@DanCrenshawTX is a Navy SEAL and hero who lost his eye in an IED attack in Afghanistan. pic.twitter.com/7VbMohQ3t2

— Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) November 4, 2018

Please RT this list of ⁦@nbcsnl⁩ sponsors with social media and contact links.

Let them know how you feel about Pete Davidson mocking wounded warriors.

TV Shows: Saturday Night Live (NBC) https://t.co/CVEp8eiyfW

— John Cardillo (@johncardillo) November 4, 2018

When Donald Trump was running for the presidency, he was viciously attacked by the Jew-run media because they thought he was mocking a disabled reporter.

But naturally, it is perfectly acceptable for this Jew on SNL to mock a Republican Congressional candidate for his disability. And unlike with Trump, this was a scripted and deliberate mockery of Crenshaw – who is a war hero, which is something a helluva lot more respectable than being a lying journalist snake.

It is a legitimately offensive thing to see a Jew mock a man who got injured fighting in a war that mostly benefits Israel. Anybody offended by Davidson’s mockery should ask themselves why America keeps fighting wars for the benefit of this demonic Jewish race.

Few Jews have served in the American military even though Americans have been shedding blood for the benefit of Israel and international Zionism for decades. This insane policy needs to end!

An Israeli diplomat just admitted a very inconvenient fact. Few Jews living in the United States have ever served in the American military. Considering that America has been fighting all sorts of insane wars for Jews and Israel, this is not something they want people talking about.

Reuters:

A top Israeli diplomat was rebuked by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday for suggesting that American Jews have a poor commitment to service in the U.S. military.

Asked in an English-language television interview about criticism of Israeli policies by some U.S. Jews, Deputy Foreign Minister Tzipi Hotovely questioned whether “people that never send their children to fight for their country” could understand the “complexity” of the Middle east.

“Most of the Jews don’t have children serving as soldiers, going to the Marines, going to Afghanistan or to Iraq,” she said on i24 TV news on Wednesday.

“They don’t feel how it feels to be attacked by rockets, and I think part of it is to actually experience what Israel is dealing with on a daily basis,” said Hotovely, a member of Netanyahu’s right-wing Likud party.

It’s not a surprise to see how Netanyahu quickly distanced Israel away from these remarks. The last thing the Jews want are the American people waking up to the fact that they’re fighting wars for them even though few Jews serve themselves.

This story highlights how insane the current situation is. Why are we fighting wars for a group of parasites like the Jews? How does the American alliance with Israel benefit the American people?

The only explanation we are given are vague references to “muh Holocaust” and Jews allegedly being god’s chosen people. It’s all nonsense.

America should end any and all support to Israel immediately. If the Jews are truly god’s chosen people then they shouldn’t need American military protection. After all, god would protect them if they are really his chosen people. If god doesn’t protect them, than it is safe to assume that their claim of being god’s chosen people has been a lie.

Well, it’s been 15 years since 19 Moslems, mostly from Saudi Arabia, blew up our towers and George W. Bush declared “war on terrorism.”

What’s happened since then?

A series of Jewish wars and a Jewish-led mass-invasion of our countries by Moslem terrorists.

2001

The US invaded Afghanistan. The Taliban was blamed for the attacks, even though there was no connection to them. So Bush invaded Afghanistan. Currently, this war is still on going, and the US-backed democratic human rights government is about to lose to the Taliban. The entire war was completely meaningless.

2003

The US invaded Iraq – Bush said that Saddam Hussein was planning to nuke America somehow, so he invaded Iraq. This war lasted over a decade and when Obama finally pulled the troops out, the country was mostly taken over by terrorists.

At the time of the invasion, the majority of Americans believed that Saddam Hussein had ordered the 911 attacks.

2010

Through the internet, Western intelligence agencies created the “Arab Spring,” which was supposedly a series of pro-democracy coups, but turned out to be Islamic extremists overthrowing stable secular governments to replace them with monkey madness.

This led to an open US policy of backing terrorist groups to overthrow stable governments.

2011

The Presidents of Egypt and Tunisia resigned due to protesting hoax.

US funds terrorists to invade Libya. Hillary Clinton bombs Libya, Kills Gaddaffi and turns the place into a circus which ultimately leads to the formation of ISIS.

Clinton’s excuse for bombing Libya was that people were protesting and it was necessary bomb the country for human rights.

2011 also featured the pull-out from destroyed Iraq, which provided a cool place for ISIS to setup.

The Syrian “civil war,” which is still on-going, began in 2011 at the tail-end of the Western-backed “Arab Spring” hoax.

2014

The “Islamic State of Iraq and Syria” (ISIS) was announced, and took over mass territory in Syria and Iraq in the midst of the chaos.

2015

Russia went into Syria to try and fix the mess, while the West attempted to thwart them and protect the terrorists.

The Deplorable Elephants in the Room

What has not ever been addressed during all of this is Saudi Arabia, where the 15 of the 19 attackers were from, and who it is now admitted planned and funded the operation. The US continues to celebrate Saudi as an ally, giving them billions of dollars. Currently, Obama is considering vetoing a bill which has passed both the Senate and the House allowing families of 911 victims to sue the Saudi government for funding the attack.

Also remaining unaddressed by everyone is the fact that all of these wars benefit Israel, and are planned by American Jews in our government and running influential think tanks.

There is also a real possibility that Israel itself planned or assisted with the 911 attacks. Due to the Israeli Mossad connections with Saudi secret services, there is zero chance they didn’t know about them. There is also no doubt that dozens, if not hundreds of people within the American intelligence community would at the very least have known the attacks were coming.

Yet none of that has been investigated.

Meanwhile

As the West has been causing insane amounts of chaos in the Middle East through invasions and then weird Twitter revolutions and organized Islamic terrorism, they were also invading themselves with infinity Moslems.

Since 911, over 2 million Moslems have been allowed to immigrate into the United States. Europe has been even crazier with their self-invasion policy, with Germany taking in 2 million Moslems in 2015 alone, and Sweden having replaced more than a tenth of their population with Moslems over the last decade and a half.

Terrorist attacks have now become the norm, with one happening every few days.

In Short

It would have been physically impossible to respond in a worse way to these attacks. It has been a monumental disaster, from every conceivable angle.

Unless you’re a Jew.

The insane invasions, bombings, coups and terrorist revolutions are directly related to the current influx of “migrants.” Not simply because all of this democracy-building made the countries difficult to live in, but because people felt bad about the wars, felt as though they owed these people something.

So you had Jews on one side pushing for these invasions, then you had Jews on the other side saying “oh, you bad goyim, you invaded these people – let them all come and live on welfare in your country and rape and murder you or you are a bad person.”

The last 15 years have been defined by 911. It has been 15 years of getting Jewed-over on a scale as history has never seen – and history has seen a whole lot of large-scale Jewing.

We’ve Finally Learned Our Lesson – Maybe

The good news is, that after 15 years, things are finally turning around. People are beginning to see this nightmare for what it is. And people are beginning to resist.

Donald Trump is the answer to the last 15 years of being Jewed by kikes.

Whereas Hillary is calling for an expansion of the endless wars and infinity immigrant program, Trump is aggressively opposed to both of these deplorable agendas.

And it looks like he’s going to be our next President.

America was effectively destroyed, not by the attack itself, but by the Jews who manipulated us in the aftermath.

Now, we have a chance to redeem this once-great nation.

Hail Victory.

Barack Obama sought as his legacy to bring an end to the two longest wars in U.S. history. On Oct. 15, he, again, admitted failure.

The 9,800 U.S. troops in Afghanistan will remain another year. And, on Inauguration Day 2017, 5,500 U.S. troops will still be there.

Why cannot we leave? Because, if we do, we risk the re-seizure of power by the Taliban we drove out 14 years ago, and a wipeout of all we have accomplished in America’s longest war.

When can we come home? Never, if we hope to secure that for which we have already paid with 2,500 U.S. dead.

For not only have the Taliban shown they can capture cities like Kunduz in the north, ISIS has arrived to begin its trademark atrocities. One can only imagine what will happen to the men, women and girls we liberated when we leave, and Kabul falls. Think Saigon, 1975.

In reluctantly deciding not to depart, Obama seems to have learned the lesson of Iraq. There, we have gone back in with 3,000 U.S. troops, after the president had pulled out the last 10,000.

And what is the balance sheet now on Operation Iraqi Freedom, the bloodiest and most costly American war since Vietnam?

The Islamic State controls Mosul, Ramadi and the huge Sunni province of Anbar. Baghdad relies on U.S. air power against ISIS, but looks to Tehran for guidance. The Shiite militias indispensable to the regime’s survival are, most of them, pro-ayatollah and anti-American.

Unloved and unappreciated, the American Empire soldiers on.

Understandably, President Obama does not want a collapse on his watch in Baghdad or Kabul, though he opposed the Iraq war and was never an enthusiast of nation-building in the Hindu Kush.

The liberal interventionists and neocons who goaded George W. Bush on got us into these wars. But they had no clue as to what would happen once we got in, and they have no idea today on how we can get out. Indeed, they have no desire to get out.

Rather, they want us to repudiate the nuclear deal that the five permanent members of the Security Council and Germany negotiated with Iran, and impose new sanctions. And if Iran refuses to renegotiate and yield, they would happily exercise “all options on the table.”

They would not rule out yet another American war, on Iran, which has a larger population than Afghanistan and Iraq put together, and is far better prepared and equipped to defend itself.

They want the United States to sustain the “good” rebels in Syria and to insist that “Assad must go.” Asked who rises if Assad falls, if not ISIS, they dismiss the question.

But if ISIS is the enemy with whom we cannot deal, why do we not partner with Putin, the Iranians, the Syrian army of Bashar Assad and the Kurds to all pile on and annihilate ISIS in Syria and Iraq?

John Kerry’s repetitive reply — “Assad must go!”

Vladimir Putin’s retort — the Americans have “mush for brains.”

Looking at what we sought to do with our interventions in Libya, Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Afghanistan, has any of them turned out as the war hawks predicted, or we had hoped? Do the prospects of any of these failed states look better for our intervention?

Yet the Beltway hawks now want to confront Russia in Syria and Ukraine, and are looking forward to challenging China’s claims to islets in the Spratly chain by sailing U.S. warships inside the 12-mile limit.

Republican presidential candidates like Lindsey Graham are even talking up sending U.S. ground forces back into Iraq and into Syria.

What we could accomplish there, and when we could get out, are questions that are not only unanswered, they are unasked.

In analyzing the presidential race, the one conclusion upon which all agree is that the anti-Washington, anti-incumbent sentiment is far deeper and wider than most had imagined.

The surge in the polls of Bernie Sanders at the expense of Hillary Clinton, and of Donald Trump at the expense of the GOP establishment, are the political stories of the year.

And what do Socialist Sanders and Capitalist Trump have in common? Neither is an interventionist — both opposed the Iraq War.

Trump, unlike Carly Fiorina, would talk to Vladimir Putin. Unlike the departed Scott Walter, he would not tear up the Iran nuclear deal the day he took office. He would monitor and enforce it.

Unlike other Republican candidates, he does not look upon Putin’s intervention on behalf of Assad with anger and outrage. If Putin wants to bomb ISIS, be my guest, says Trump.

Trump has not laid out a broad foreign policy. Yet, the sense one gets is that, like Eisenhower, Nixon and Reagan, he is a “peace through strength” Republican who looks to extricate us from Mideast wars now underway, and not be looking to start any new ones.

For anti-interventionists, Trump vs. Sanders is the ideal race.

Photos and captions added by The Daily Stormer.