Trump appears to vow that he won’t “abandon” Ukraine, whatever that means exactly. It would be nice to know, for instance, if “not abandoning” Ukraine means continuing to arm and fund Ukraine, but apparently that’s still an intolerable level of specifics to get into pic.twitter.com/6ROAByooRd

— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) December 12, 2024

Related: Zelensky Proposes Deploying NATO Troops to His Shithole

There is probably going to have to be some kind of peacekeepers in the Ukraine following the end of the conflict, because Ukrainians themselves are going to be trying to kill Zelensky and everyone else in the government and the whole situation is going to descend into mass chaos.

They still have all of these weapons, and they can’t be allowed to become a terrorist state.

Russia doesn’t want to do this job, and America shouldn’t do it. There is no one other than the EU.

That is, unless the US backs some kind of military dictatorship in the Ukraine, which would be the best option for all parties.

RT:

US President-elect Donald Trump has proposed that EU members send peacekeepers to Ukraine to monitor a ceasefire with Russia, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday, citing people familiar with the matter.

Trump ran for the White House on the promise of negotiating a swift end to the Russia-Ukraine conflict, but has been reluctant to reveal any specifics of his actual proposal since winning the election.

Speaking with French President Emmanuel Macron and Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky last Saturday, Trump argued that “Europe” should play the main role in monitoring a ceasefire and that no US troops would be involved, the Journal reported, citing “officials briefed on the meeting.”

…

The hypothetical peacekeeping or monitoring mission in Ukraine would not be under NATO command but would involve troops from member countries of the US-led bloc, according to the unnamed officials, who admitted this was something they were not sure Russia would accept.

There is no such thing as a “US peacekeeping operation.” Whenever the US sends in troops for alleged peacekeeping following a conflict, such as in Syria, they are there to stir up another conflict (as they just did in Syria).

There is no way Russia would tolerate US/NATO peacekeepers, but the EU can probably do this.

The problem is that the US could easily slip in troops among these EU peacekeepers and start trying to turn the country into a terrorist state.

Needless to say, we can’t really take what the Wall Street Journal says very seriously either way. It’s possible Trump isn’t even going to try to end the war at all. Certainly, his Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, has no interest in that.

Just look at this video where he refers to Putin as “El Diablo Grande Cabron”:

Marco Rubio:

“Maduro no es solamente un dictador, es un narcotraficante, él y Diosdado Cabello, y muchos otros que se han lucrado de la droga (…) estamos lidiando con unos mafiosos que controlan un territorio nacional” 🇻🇪 pic.twitter.com/5xf51w0YUg

— emiliano 🇻🇪 (@ElPaisDeLaFe) November 13, 2024

(NOTE: I don’t know that he says that in this video. I don’t understand monkey.)

The Wall Street Journal is supposed to be the… journal of Wall Street. That is to say, it’s supposed to be a rather right-wing paper for the men involved in finance.

In general, finance people only care about finance. That is to say, they want the markets to be good. There has never been anything worse for the markets than this Russia hoax. We haven’t felt the fallout yet – but we will.

So you have to wonder: why is the Wall Street Journal promoting these Russian atrocity hoaxes?

Obviously, it’s not a serious publication. As I’ve already written today, there is absolutely no logic at all in the claim that Russia blew up this train station.

It is confirmed that:

• The missile was fired from territory controlled by the Ukraine, and
• The missile used was a type only used by the Ukrainian forces

It’s fine to say “Kiev and US claim Russia did this,” but that is not what the WSJ is doing. They are reporting, uncritically, without any evidence, that Russia was responsible.

They’ve been doing this throughout the entire fake war in the Ukraine. They support the sanctions. It’s outrageous.

I know a lot of people in finance, and no one is feeling good about anything. There is a sense of total doom, as a result of the blowback from these sanctions. They were actually happy about all the covid stuff, because the inflation can be good for them.

But they are all sensing that this Russian sanctions plot is going to lead to an unraveling of everything, as the series of events unfolds which will lead to the dollar losing its status as reserve currency. Obviously, people will make money on this. Some people will. But for the most part, there is going to be a huge sucking sound of capital exiting the United States for China and other countries that will benefit from the collapse of the US dollar.

All of these finance people used to trust the WSJ, but they are now asking what is going on, that the Journal is so aggressively promoting this war, and all of these hoaxes, which are going to be so bad for the economy.

Of course, the only explanation for this is that the WSJ is run by Jews. There is no other possible explanation for why a US finance publication would be directly aiding the implosion of the US economy, which is going to wipe out most of the people on Wall Street.

This speaks to the larger issue, which we’ve been trying to press home for the entire time this site has been online: what is happening on planet earth is not “all about the money.” The money is very secondary to the agenda. The money is only a means to achieve the agenda.

Of course, now the agenda itself is so bogged down that the people running the agenda don’t even seem to understand what the agenda even is – but it is on autopilot.

The media is claiming that Alex Jones planned the January 6 rally.

The original report is from the Wall Street Journal, a famous censorship and shutting down organization. Everyone else is picking it up.

The only reason that they would publish this is that they’re trying to get Alex did-up.

But of course they are trying to get Alex did-up.

And also of course, they can do that if they want.

The media faked an election right in front of everyone, and then basically said “yeah, so? What’re you gonna do about it, goy?”

Doing up Alex Jones is nothing to them. They have godlike control of this country, and everyone in it – and they are going buckwild.

There’s basically no way they’re going to allow people to continue to speak, other than a few groups. They will allow some version of Proud Boys, which will be some sort of terrorist group, and they will allow neo-Nazis, who will probably be marching all around the place in their costumes.

But for all of his shilling for the Jews, the Jews really, really hate Alex Jones. More importantly, he isn’t totally a fed – he’s just a savvy guy who knew that saying “Jew” means the supplement business gets shut down. That’s the thing: you have to kind of be a moron to become wrapped up with the feds.

There’s a difference between being a fed and strategically shilling for Jews to keep the money coming in. Both of those things used to be tolerated, and now only one of those things is tolerated.

CNN:

Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones helped jumpstart the organization efforts that eventually materialized into the “Stop the Steal” rally on January 6, according to the grassroots organizer who filed the permits.

Cindy Chafian, who said she submitted the permits to the National Park Service, told CNN that Jones had reached out to her “to make sure he was able to speak at an event that he had contributed to.”

She said she had originally submitted the permits while working for Women for America First. The group was founded by Amy Kremer, who previously worked as an executive of the conservative group Tea Party Express, and her daughter Kylie Jane Kremer.

Chafian said that because the Kremers became unresponsive and non-committal, she embarked on her own in organizing a January 6 event and eventually teamed up with Jones.

“He agreed to pay for a percentage of the event and I was to try and find someone to help with the funding gap,” Chafian said of her agreement with Jones. “He connected me with Caroline M. Wren because there was somebody that she knew who wanted to help contribute to the event.”

The Wall Street Journal, citing unnamed rally organizers, reported that donor was Publix heiress Julie Jenkins Fancelli, who ended up giving $300,000 for the “Stop the Steal” rally on the Ellipse near the White House. Fancelli’s donation, they went on to report, was arranged by Jones and made up the majority of the $500,000 it cost to hold the rally on January 6.

Jones, the Journal reported citing a funding document, offered upwards of $50,000 of his own money for a “top speaking slot of his choice.”

Despite being banned from many social media platforms for spreading conspiracy theories, the new revelations show that Jones maintains significant ties to the influential people within the Republican Party.

What we are clearly witnessing is an attempt by the media to frame the supposed “far-right white supremacist conspiracy theorist Russian-backed extremists” as a sort of military arm of the GOP.

Basically, the Proud Boys – and Alex Jones, who moronically tied himself to the Proud Boys by hiring them as his entourage – are being framed as the IRA to the GOP’s Sinn Féin.

Related: Nancy Pelosi Says Republican Congressmen Tried to Bring Guns Into Congress to Kill Her

It’s incredible that this is what is happening. Even I didn’t really expect it to go this far when I was preaching doom over the summer.

But surprise!

Here it is!

Chafian would not comment more to CNN on Jones’ offer and did not confirm Fancelli’s donation to the “Stop the Steal” organizers. CNN has reached out to Women for America First and Fancelli for comment but did not receive a response.

“Like many Americans, Mr. Jones peacefully assembled to register his concerns about the 2020 election,” Norm Pattis, Jones’ attorney told CNN in a statement. “He deplores the violence that took place.”

Pattis did not respond to questions from CNN about Jones’ involvement in the early planning, or leveraging his connections to Wren and Fancelli in the initial organizing of the January 6 rally.

Remember in the evening of January 6, when I called this “Charlottesville 2”?

Are you starting to see that now?

As more information comes to light about the funding, and origins, of the January 6 rally, the investigation into whether the riot and insurrection was pre-planned continues. At least 175 people are facing riot-related charges. In a press call earlier this week, the Department of Justice told reporters it had identified over 400 subjects in its investigations.

Although the January 6 rally at the Ellipse was peaceful, and no organizers have been accused of wrongdoing, former President Donald Trump’s speech is under scrutiny for potentially inciting the riot.

Trump reelection deputy finance chair became central to rally planning

On Jones’ urging, Chafian did reach out to Wren on December 27. Wren, a GOP fundraiser and a finance official for Trump’s reelection campaign, also served as a deputy to Kimberly Guilfoyle at a RNC-Trump campaign joint fundraising committee, according to ProPublica.

(ProPublica is a shutting down organization run by Jewish hedge fund managers – just in case you forgot that. It’s been much more successful than either the SPLC or the ADL in shutting people down.)

Apparently, Alex Jones was contacted by Elected President Donald Trump himself and asked to lead the march. Alex Jones himself said it, and others have as well.

Blue Checka has been calling for Alex to be did up by feds since immediately after the event.

His whore ex-wife was the first one to make the call for the feds to investigate him – though I’m sure it was nothing personal. (By the way, Kelly Nichols/Jones/Morales is half Jewish. I don’t blame Rex for that – we love ya Rex, buddy. Stay strong.)

1/ #CapitolRiots fueled by #AlexJones’ propaganda.

Alex Jones paid $500K organize the event, admits he was directed by #Trump to lead the crowd to the Capitol.

.@FBI Pls Investigate Free Speech System’s & Trump’s communications, donors & pre-election funding of infowars. pic.twitter.com/32AtbHMRrR

— Kelly Morales (@RealKellyJones) January 7, 2021

If Trump really did ask Alex to lead the march on the Capitol, then that does suggest that he was trying to – well, I guess we all get what it suggests.

Alex wasn’t there. He remained on the lawn, and said that the occupation of the Capitol was a false flag (he basically said the same thing I said, just more conspiratorially).

Trying to construct him into this story they’re building isn’t going to be difficult, however. In fact, they’ve already done it. WSJ printed some bullshit and that is what the FBI will run with. Remember: WSJ was the root of the Russia hoax. The entire thing was build around the #pissgate dossier hoax, saying Trump hired Russian hookers to piss on a bed while the KGB filmed it. That “dirty dossier” was the result of William Kristol contracting Fusion GPS, a group founded by three former WSJ journalists, to write a fake intelligence report on Trump. This was then used by James Comey and Rod Rosenstein to get a FISA warrant to spy on Trump. Then, it was used again by the same people to start the Mueller Sanhedrin.

The Wall Street Journal gets things done.

Alex should have fled the country a long time ago. He’s now a link in a chain where simply because he’s so recognizable, he’s going to get tied up in this lunacy.

I am still processing the fact that the media/Democrat Party appear to be constructing a plan to just completely abolish the Republican Party completely. But that is what is happening, and they’ve already laid out the whole script.

Do you guys see how I’m seeing this? It’s not prophecy. Right now, I’m not making a prediction – I’m simply describing what these obvious moves obviously imply. Are you seeing the parts here? This is how I knew that coronavirus would never end. I just looked at what they were doing. I didn’t predict anything, and I didn’t commit a prophecy, I simply said: “these statements and actions can only go one place.”

If you drop a coin off a bridge, and I say “that’s going to hit the water and sink,” you don’t accuse me of being a prophet.

God help Alex Jones. He’s got a lot of problems, but he has tried to do the right thing, here and there.

(Editor’s Note: “Blue Checka” is officially TM Daily Stormer meme. I just thought of that right now, and I’m thinking to myself “how did I not think of this earlier?” It’s worse then when I thought of all those jokes about how journalists should capitalize all the letters in BLACK when referring to black people months after the media changed their standards to capitalize the first letter of the word.)

The United States has shut down my freedom of speech – I’m an American citizen arguing for American interests, and they allowed “private companies” to completely silence me across every platform. They also allowed my finances to be shut down.

It’s something a lot more brutal than the Chinese did by kicking some WSJ journalists out of the country.

Every time the US talks about other countries needing “freedom of speech” they are simply lying on purpose. The US has less freedom of speech than any other country in history. Even in the USSR, they didn’t silence you for insulting gays or women, let alone nonwhites or Jews. That was all encouraged, in fact, in the Soviet Union.

In China you can keep your bank account, your social media and your websites if you insult Jews, nonwhites, gays or women. China has vastly more freedom of speech than we do. And even if you do insult the government – they might fine you or in an extreme case give you a few months in jail, but when you get out you’re not banned from working or using banks – you’re not even banned from accessing social media!

We have the most brutal censorship regime ever, in all of history.

But they’re going to complain that an op-ed attacking the country of China – who we are basically at war with – is something that the Chinese should tolerate in the name of “free speech”?

This is a sick joke.

New York Times:

China on Wednesday said it would revoke the press credentials of three Wall Street Journal reporters working in mainland China, in a significant escalation of Beijing’s pressure on the foreign news media.

At a daily news briefing on Wednesday, a spokesman for China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said the credentials would be revoked in retaliation for a headline for an essay that ran in The Journal’s editorial pages earlier this month. The headline read, “China Is the Real Sick Man of Asia.”

Chinese officials have “demanded that The Wall Street Journal recognize the seriousness of the error, openly and formally apologize, and investigate and punish those responsible, while retaining the need to take further measures against the newspaper,” Geng Shuang, the ministry spokesman, said in a transcript provided by the Chinese government.

“The Chinese people do not welcome media that publish racist statements and smear China with malicious attacks,” he added.

…

Like other media organizations, including The New York Times, The Journal runs its news and editorial departments as separate operations, meaning none of the newspaper’s reporters in China would have been involved in writing the essay’s headline.

The move comes just months after Chinese officials effectively expelled another Journal reporter, Chun Han Wong, from mainland China. Officials did not provide a reason, but the expulsion came after he co-wrote an article about a cousin of China’s top leader, Xi Jinping.

It also comes less than one day after American officials in Washington said they would treat five government-controlled Chinese news organizations — Xinhua, CGTN, China Radio, China Daily and People’s Daily — as foreign government functionaries, subject to similar rules as diplomats stationed in the United States.

The opinion piece with the “Sick Man” headline was written by Walter Russell Mead, a professor at Bard College. It criticized China’s initial response to the coronavirus outbreak as well as the state of the country’s financial markets.

Everything in the media is just pure and absolute narrative. And it is all useless.

These people want to say “it’s different when the government censors you in China than when a monopoly company censors you in America.”

But what is the difference? How does this distinction affect the life of the censored?

How is this different than any other crime being okay for a company to commit against me but not okay for the government to commit against me?

What if it was legal for an organized conspiracy of multinational corporations to kill me, but not legal for the government to do so, and the government also refused to protect me in any way from being killed by a conspiracy of multinational corporations?

Would I be less dead if I was killed by the corporate conspiracy than by the government?

Furthermore, the concept of “the system” is clearly both real and relevant, as not only do the interests of the government bureaucracy and the tech monopolies overlap, they are also continually working together. The internet infrastructure that is used by these companies was built by the taxpayers. These companies get extreme tax cuts. These companies talk about their ability to influence elections. These companies donate to the government. Moreover, both the tech companies and the government are controlled by foreign Jewish agents. There is so much direct overlap that they can and should be considered separate parts of a unified system.

The US regularly refers to Chinese and Russian “private companies” as “organs of the regime.” But somehow that concept doesn’t apply to America, even though the degree of intertwinedness is exactly the same.

This is all simply nonsensical – “a company can violate your Constitutional rights but the government can’t.” It is completely incoherent. And it certainly isn’t what was intended by the Constitution, I can tell you that. Basic capitalism didn’t exist when the Constitution was written, let alone the Libertarian Talmud that has been attached onto capitalism.

If the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal cared about freedom of speech, they would draw up a chart showing what you’re allowed to say without getting censored in China vs. what you’re allowed to say without getting censored in America.

It would look like this:

The Wall Street Journal is promoting outdated science.

Breitbart:

The Wall Street Journal has issued a throwdown to the gender lobby, insisting in an op-ed Thursday that sex is binary and there is no “spectrum.”

“In humans, reproductive anatomy is unambiguously male or female at birth more than 99.98% of the time,” note biologists Colin M. Wright and Emma N. Hilton. “The evolutionary function of these two anatomies is to aid in reproduction via the fusion of sperm and ova.”

“No third type of sex cell exists in humans, and therefore there is no sex ‘spectrum’ or additional sexes beyond male and female. Sex is binary,” they assert.

That really sounds like something intended to make the authors and people opposing The Tranny look bad on purpose.

The whole “spectrum” thing has been explained time and time again.

You see, there’s a thing called Gender.

No, wait. Wrong image.

Hold on.

One more time.

There’s some kind of creature called The Gender Unicorn.

This Gender Unicorn being possesses people and makes them believe that the manner in which they have to act and feel, and who they find sexually appealing, are not determined by their physical genitals — which were arbitrarily assigned to them by evil doctors through the first ultrasound scan performed on their mothers — but by the imaginary genitals that they chose for themselves.

Choice and Freedom are part of Our Values as a Democracy, so people choosing their own genitals is The Right Thing to Do.

Since imagination has no limits, there are infinite forms of imaginary genitals, and as such, the distinction between sex (physical genitals) and gender (the true genitals inhabiting people’s hearts) was born.

No one has ever talked about a “physical genital spectrum” so it isn’t clear who The Wall Street Journal is arguing against.

The whole tranny and gender stuff is a thing of the mind.

The WSJ writers are responding to what they call a “dangerous and anti-scientific trend toward the outright denial of biological sex,” which sees male and female as “arbitrary groupings.”

…

The WSJ essay echoes concerns increasingly being voiced that modern society has rushed into a dangerous social experiment based on less than flimsy scientific foundations.

“The concept of changing one’s biological sex is, of course, nonsense, as sex is determined by unalterable chromosomes,” wrote researcher Jane Robbins for Public Discourse last October. “An individual can change his hormone levels and undergo surgery to better imitate the opposite sex, but a male on the day of his conception will remain a male on the day of his death.”

…

“The falsehood that sex is rooted in subjective identity instead of objective biology renders all these sex-based rights impossible to enforce,” the writers note.

…

“The time for politeness on this issue has passed,” the authors conclude. “Biologists and medical professionals need to stand up for the empirical reality of biological sex.”

When certain scientific institutions betray their mandate by abandoning empirical fact in favor of ideology, it is time for real science to take a stand.

If they want to take some kind of scientific stance against the tranny stuff, why not go into how sexual organs affect hormones and how hormones affect the brain and behavior?

Or something at least similarly interesting.

We all know people either have a penis or a vagina — even people infected with The Tranny know that. The problem lies in thinking that the behaviors born out of such physical differences are actually totally made up “social constructs” that can and should be constructed into something else.

Pictured: something else.

So, according to the Wall Street Journal, it has already begun.

Mainland Chinese are going to Hong Kong to engage in these Western-backed riots of absolute terror against the peaceful nation of China.

Wall Street Journal:

On June 16, a 24-year-old female graduate student with the family name Chen donned a black T-shirt, grabbed a surgical mask in case she needed to hide her face, and joined a massive march against further erosion of the city’s freedoms by China.

That much was standard procedure for many of the estimated two million people who took to the streets that day. What set her apart was her Chinese passport.

We have to take this with a grain of MSG, of course, because WSJ is the key State Department media outlet attempting to stir this wok.

But it seems to me to be believable enough that at least some mainlanders are getting all hopped up on revolution gibberish and traveling to Hong Kong to get involved in the umbrella war.

This is going to lead to a situation like in Syria, where people were traveling to join ISIS and then returning home to commit terrorist acts. These people traveling to Hong Kong and seeing the glory of throwing firebombs at cops and waving around big sticks will absolutely return to Guangzhou, Shanghai and Beijing and start pushing for violent revolution on the streets of those cities.

There is no way this ends other than in violence, China.

Everyone understands this.

The longer it goes on, the closer it gets to spreading, and on a long enough timeline, without a gratuitous display of bloody force, there is no possibility that this won’t be the end of the Chinese Empire.

They will do to China the same thing they did to the USSR, once this machine gets rolling, splitting it up into a bunch of different smaller states.

They will no doubt put the kiked-out Hong Kong revolutionary movement in charge of the entirety of Cantonese South China, where – by sheer good luck – most of the important manufacturing and ports are.

Yay, the supply lines will hardly be affected as China ends forever and tens of millions of people die at the hands of a Jewish terrorist campaign.

So, China – you’d better start killing these people now, because it will soon be far too late.

The fat man is in the hot seat again.

After having been pressed hard at Brown University a few weeks ago, Game of Thrones creator George RR Martin was ambushed and called-out again this week during an SJW+ foru- oh wait, no sorry, it was the WSJ+ forum.

Funny how similar the questions and atmosphere of the “conservative” Wall Street Journal forum are to any leftist college lecture.

The black host cornered him and asked him why there are not more people of color in the fantasy genre and in the Game of Thrones series. Specifically, he asked: “why in your opinion is fantasy so monocultural, and what could be done to change that?”

Martin made this face:

And then he took a deep breath and said that the answer was very simple: “because it’s written by white men.”

He then explained to the nigger what supply and demand is, saying that there are many up and coming nonwhite authors, but in order for them to become popular and sell books, people have to buy the books. And then, he told the nigger, if many people buy the books, they will get made into movies and TV shows.

I would take issue with Martin’s agreement with the black that there were no “people of color” in JRR Tolkien books though.

Basically, the entire Lord of the Rings series was about the various Islamic invasions of Europe. The dark races are the hordes of Mordor.

But I don’t expect poor George Martin to press that issue in an already very uncomfortable situation.

I don’t know why this poor old squirming fat man is constantly being trotted out to answer SJW questions, but I suppose anyone who is anyone – that is anyone with a public face – has to pledge his allegiance to the SJW religion. And he did write his books in the 90s, meaning that they contain a lot of stuff that is problematic these days. Even the first few seasons of the show, released in the late 00s, are problematic by today’s standards.

And naturally, all of this “fat man squirms in chair after being called a racist on stage” is generating hype for the new season of Game of Thrones that’s coming out soon.

I wonder if the dragons fuck any of the chicks.

Because that would be the ultimate twist.

And I wouldn’t put it past the writers. Pushing this whole female/beast dynamic really is cutting edge stuff.

Since there are no more gay characters in GOT that I am aware of, they really need to step their stuff up a notch to end the show with a subversive bang.

I humbly suggest the dragons-on-blondes idea. 

It’s less degenerate than what we usually see on HBO anyway. And women can’t exactly go out and fuck dragons… yet.

On Monday, Wall Street Journal, formerly an enemy of PewDiePie, issued this lovely apology and endorsed PewDiePie in his race war against India:

However, soon after the post went up, it was deleted and the Wall Street Journal claimed that they had been “hacked.”

Sorry, but how exactly does that happen?

How often do you hear of major newspapers being hacked?

Either this was an act from someone within the company, or the WSJ endorsed Pewds and then changed their mind.

You can’t just type a bunch of lines of code into a terminal and hack the mainframe like in that movie “Hackers.”

The only accurate thing about that movie is that Angelina Jolie was only hot when she was 18.

It’s always downhill from there.

Someone has to have had access to the WSJ site to post this endorsement, so that means that Pewds has an ally inside of enemy lines.

If you want to win a race war against India, you need spies.

And he’s got em.

Sadly… the reality fact is that PewDiePie cannot hold on forever, because there are simply too many Indians on earth, and eventually all of them are going to subscribe to that one horrible music video channel, because their culture is that boring and vapid.

Furthermore, no matter what, YouTube is going to eventually ban PewDiePie.

There is a zero percent chance that they will not eventually do so.

Thus, if I were PewDiePie, I would want to go down while I was number one.

He is already openly attacking YouTube and Google.

He is linking to awesome channels like E;R.

He’s calling out whining Paki sluts.

He also follows a fake Sam Hyde account on Twitter.

The war drums are pounding.

"How can someone flirt so frequently and so explicitly with racist slurs and anti-Semitic jokes and thrive?

One quick and easy answer is 'because YouTube lets him.'"https://t.co/A3BHkihu0Q

— AJ Christian (@drajchristian) December 17, 2018

And there is no way PewDiePie can win this.

He is a dead man walking.

I advise blaze of glory.

All my associated channels have been deleted from YouTube. #Killstream

— Ethan Ralph (@TheRalphRetort) November 2, 2018

After first removing his streaming ability, then refunding $27,000 Ralph had raised for a cancer children charity, YouTube has permanently banned Ralph Retort and all associated channels from the platform.

This move comes after the Gunfight at the O.K. Synagogue, an event that Jews are using to shut down anyone who disagrees with them by claiming that the gunfight was caused by people talking about things on the internet.

The operation was lead by the Wall Street Journal, and one particularly ugly gook named Yoree Koh. This is the same gook who is known to have eaten my dog.

She was writing an article about Ralph’s show, apparently with a plan to blame him for the synagogue shooting, and then he was banned from streaming. Then the charity money was refunded. Then the channel was just deleted.

The article was not even out yet, so this is all being done through backchannels.

The article has since been released, and it heavily cites the anti-free speech group “Storyful,” an antifa organization that uses Jew-sucking low-IQ Arabian turdmen to push the Jewish censorship agenda.

"Very little stands out about Bowers' account from many of the accounts on Gab."

Storyful's @MichaelEHayden discusses the type of content on Gab in an interview with @andrewcbc from @CBCNews. Tune in here: https://t.co/LAll1aFuIw pic.twitter.com/N7HU1HPRRR

— Storyful (@Storyful) October 30, 2018

The gook Koh believes that kids dying of cancer is a small price to pay to stop politically incorrect speech.

Although this gook has locked her Twitter, you can email her here: yoree.koh@wsj.com, and let her know what you think of her agenda to silence people and kill children with cancer.

The shows co-host, Zidan, also had his streaming channel deleted.

They deleted my livestream channel too. It's gone. Poof, just gone. https://t.co/tzSsyC234Q

— Zidan Lianciel (@Zidan_Lianciel) November 2, 2018

This was clearly a collaboration between Wall Street Journal and YouTube to silence someone that the Jews want silenced, because he was allowing free speech on his channel, which included speech that Jews do not approve of.

For those who aren’t familiar with Ralph, this was an apolitical show. He would just have anyone on and let them say whatever. He wasn’t supporting anyone’s ideas. It is an open-format talk show.

Shutting down one of the most popular live streams on YouTube because Jews got shot is yet another major overreach.

Even people who do not like Ralph are coming out and supporting him – people with a lot of followers.

Ralph is a dick and a tiny man, but everything that happened to him in the past 24 hours is absolute horseshit.
I get he and his guest's opinions are distasteful, but he isn't doing anything illegal. He deserves a channel and his money should be good for ANY charity. https://t.co/iyV7bc7CBM

— Skepticᵀᴹ 🇨🇦 (@ArmouredSkeptic) November 2, 2018

me and this dude have absolutely had issues in the past & i doubt we will ever see eye to eye but he’s under attack for hosting an open platform alt righters occasionally hang out on. $30k they raised for st.jude was REFUNDED & his channels deleted. what the fuck? https://t.co/WrtAl3GXA3

— shoe (@shoe0nhead) November 2, 2018

Armoured Skeptic and Shoe were both butts of jokes on the Ralph Show, but they see where this is going.

The Alt-Lite chimed in.

Taking money from sick children to own the offensive right wingers is a new level of crazy. https://t.co/NuUPp0vOn5

— Cassandra 🦇 Fairbanks (@CassandraRules) November 2, 2018

In the very near future, the entire “skeptic” and Alt-Lite communities are going to get shut down. And that includes Sargon of Akkad, Stefan Molyneux – all of them.

There are no brakes on the Jewish shut it down train – and anyone who disagrees with the mainstream narrative is getting shut, even if they don’t talk about the Jews (or even if they bow down and lick the feet of Jews like Molyneux).

Even Infowars had him on to discuss the shut down.

Infowars’ resident homosexual Jew-lover even gave a shoutout.

This is shameful. The media is trying to contrive a fake moral panic about Super Chat (because God forbid YouTubers should make money).

So one channel raises 26k for dying children and the money all gets refunded because of a planned WSJ hit piece? https://t.co/XU1w3YPeIh

— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) November 2, 2018

Taking the money away from cancer kids really stirred up some anger amongst the internet citizenry.

The cancer children of St. Jude have been St. Jewed. 

.@WSJ @yoreekoh, bless your heart, you wretched witch.@TheRalphRetort @MisterAntiBully @Zidan_Lianciel @TheGatorGamer @KEEMSTAR @imwithdick #Healstream #WSJKillsKids pic.twitter.com/SBTtjop73R

— Chavez (@morebreasts) November 2, 2018

How far up your own ass are you to pressure the biggest video streaming platform to dismantle the most popular late night stream, who's doing St Jude charity stream, with an "article" forcing the money be refunded because you disagree #Killstream opinions/platform? #WSJKillsKids

— Ken Lao 🍜 肯老撾 (@oaLneK) November 2, 2018

#WSJKillsKids Good Job "Journalists". pic.twitter.com/5EwkPI5M7h

— Timbothrowaway (@timbothrowaway) November 2, 2018

Roses are red,
Blood is too.
Children will die from cancer, all because of you. #WSJKillsKids https://t.co/nS3BVnvlwS

— 🎃👻𝓢𝓹𝓸𝓸𝓴𝔂 𝓛𝓮𝓪𝓯👻🎃 (@TheLeafLives) November 2, 2018

Here is another way to contact @WSJ to voice your opinion on why they hate kids with cancer! #WSJKillsKids
1-800-JOURNAL (1-800-568-7625)
Toll: 1-609-627-1351
service@wsj-asia.com
Digital: subs.wsje@dowjones.com
UK: +44(0)20 3426 1313

— Zidan Lianciel (@Zidan_Lianciel) November 2, 2018

Again, in case I wasn't clear enough, fuck you @WSJ, @yoreekoh #WSJKillsKids https://t.co/qhck3s6tUW

— Nora (@VeyGoodSpy) November 2, 2018

#WSJKillsKids is gonna go trough the roof. @WSJ with @yoreekoh is up to take 26.000$ away from kids with cancer anytime.

8200 tweet in an hour@TheRalphRetort @Zidan_Lianciel @TheGatorGamer @Andywarski @MisterAntiBully @CountDankulaTV @OgieNYC pic.twitter.com/cUTPwrCUsk

— Ath| (@_Obsey_) November 2, 2018

Yoree Koh, daughter of a disgraced oncologist, started a chain of events that ended in Youtube refunding $26k meant for St Jude, a charity dedicated to treating children with cancer. Why do you hate children with cancer, Ms Koh? It is because St. Jude uses FDA regulated drugs?

— Nora (@VeyGoodSpy) November 2, 2018

#WSJKillsKids pic.twitter.com/lT2wZLoo5v

— Michelle Catlin (@CatlinNyaa) November 2, 2018

It all makes sense now!#WSJKillsKids @TheRalphRetort @Andywarski pic.twitter.com/HGUZM3hYtc

— 🐸not🐸 AliRadicali (@Banned_Ali) November 2, 2018

"Hmmm whos next" #WSJKillsKids pic.twitter.com/eAxCKAhlJH

— NemNem (@Nemotrixo) November 2, 2018

No idea why screwing over cancer children was something they thought was a good idea – “Jews got shot in a synagogue so cancer children must die in response” is not a line of reasoning that many people are able to follow.

Where’s Ralph?

Last night, Ralph streamed on a random website.

#Killstream: Too Hot for YouTube (aka Fuck the Wall Street Journal)

LIVE TONIGHT at 11:05PM EST on our Temporary Homehttps://t.co/QUH6eMS9B4

— Ethan Ralph (@TheRalphRetort) November 3, 2018

He got his numbers up to 6,000 (very good numbers), but the stream kept cutting out. I don’t know what is going to happen with this.

You can currently check his twitter to keep up with where he’s at, of course – but I don’t expect his Twitter to be up long. We know how these things go – it’s a chain reaction of shutdowns after they initially target you. These social media companies all coordinate together. It is very, very rare that someone gets kicked off a major platform and doesn’t get kicked off of every other major platform.

That said, I’m sure he’ll be able to keep a podcast up somewhere. Though obviously the majority of his revenue is going to be gone, since he was using the superchat system to support the show.

LOOK.

We need regulation. We need it now. We are all so fucked if we don’t get the First Amendment back – and that includes you, Mr. President. You cannot possibly hold up if your supporters are no longer allowed to speak in support of you on the internet.

We need to protest, we need to be talking to Congressmen, we need to organize a campaign to call the White House. This is now an issue which absolutely directly affects normie conservatives. The goal is not simply to silence “Nazis.” And it’s not simply to go one step further and silence “conspiracy theorists.” It is to silence absolutely everyone who supports Donald Trump.

We need regulation and we need it now.

Wow, can you believe a supposedly respectable news media outlet like the Wall Street Journal actually enjoys the full support of avowed Neo-Nazi White supremacists?

Really makes you think, doesn’t it?