vr – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com Daily Stormer Historical Archive Tue, 06 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.17 https://www.anglinarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/cropped-favicon-32x32.png vr – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com 32 32 Faggot Conservatives Whining About People Preferring Apple Vision to Jew Nightmare Vision https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/02/06/faggot-conservatives-whining-about-people-preferring-apple-vision-to-jew-nightmare-vision/ Tue, 06 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0000

Society is one step closer to dystopia pic.twitter.com/r5PBGgeeZS

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) February 4, 2024

The conservative influencer movement, otherwise known as “The Gay-Retard Alliance,” is whining about people wearing Apple Vision Pro in public.

A conservo-slut on Daily Caller attacked the people wearing it.

Go back three days, and you find this stupid whore, Kay Smythe, whining about people using AI to put clothes on women and remove their tattoos.

I wonder if there is a connection there?

“People are wearing computer headsets and it’s like a science fiction dystopia” yet another stupid complaint from people who refuse to talk about the Jews.

Seriously, these people are like “I’m not going to do anything that would actually solve any problem, but instead, I’m just going to lecture you as to why you shouldn’t have any fun.”

There is no reason to care if people are wearing these headsets. Further, there is a lot of reasons why you would prefer to wear one of these headsets than look at reality, including:

  • Women are all fat whores with tattoos
  • There are niggers everywhere
  • The architecture in American cities is soul-crushing
  • Everything is filthy

Seriously.

Look at reality, then tell me you are outraged that people would prefer virtual reality.

Maybe instead of whining about people who would rather live in virtual reality than look at this hellscape all day, these conservative cowards should start talking about the Jews who turned our society into a hellscape in the first place?

I still haven’t gotten to the Apple store to try one of these things out, but it’s clear that it works. Every review says it works, and the issue is simply that it’s too expensive.

However, if it can prevent you from having to live in this nightmare reality that the Jews created – if you can turn on an app that makes all the fat whores into attractive maidens, turns all the niggers white, cleans up the trash, fixes the architecture – isn’t that worth $3,500?

By the way, there is no reason why apps that overwrite ugly things in the environment won’t exist in the next couple of weeks, unless Apple bans them. AI can easily identify fat women and niggers and replace them. It’s possible that a “medieval Europe” app would be banned by Apple, however. But the Chinese are going to rip this thing off and be selling it for much cheaper with an open app system inside of a year, so it’s really irrelevant what Apple bans (the current price point is also irrelevant).

This shit works very well.

I wasn’t sure they were going to do it, but Apple delivered bigly, according to everything I’ve seen.

I wouldn’t wear one of these things, but I don’t live in the American urban hellscape. I’m in no position to judge. I will, however, judge the faggots whining about it, who, by the way, won’t even talk about the Jews.

]]> UK: Police Investigate “Gang Rape” in the Metaverse https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/01/03/uk-police-investigate-gang-rape-in-the-metaverse/ Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0000

We have multiverse rape.

So of course we need Metaverse rape as well.

I am personally considering becoming a legal scholar of theoretical and virtual rape law. My business cards will read: “the rape may be fake, by the consequences are very real.”

LBC:

Police are investigating an alleged rape in a virtual reality game after a child was attacked in the online “metaverse” – in what is thought to be the first time such a probe has been launched.

The girl, who is aged under 16, was using a headset to access a VR room when adult men attacked her avatar.

She was not injured given the assault happened within an immersive reality game, but she is said to be psychologically and emotionally traumatised.

Details about the case have reportedly been kept under wraps to protect the child amid concern a prosecution for the online assault is not viable.

It has led to questions over whether police time is being wasted investigating such problems when it has a backlog of real rape cases to deal with.

But home secretary James Cleverly told LBC’s Nick Ferrari at Breakfast: “I know it is easy to dismiss this as being not real, but the whole point of these virtual environments is they are incredibly immersive.

“And we’re talking about a child here, and a child has gone through sexual trauma.

“It will have had a very significant psychological effect and we should be very, very careful about being dismissive of this.

“It’s also worth realising that somebody who is willing to put a child through a trauma like that digitally may well be someone that could go on to do terrible things in the physical realm.

“I do think it’s right we look seriously at this. We’ve got to understand that in the world of immersive digital media, I think we have a duty to take issues like this seriously. It might seem strange to some, but I do think this is something well worth looking into.”

It was strange to some to arrest women for praying in their minds outside of abortion clinics. That didn’t prevent the British from doing it.

A senior officer who is familiar with the case said: “This child experienced psychological trauma similar to that of someone who has been physically raped.

“There is an emotional and psychological impact on the victim that is longer term than any physical injuries.

“It poses a number of challenges for law enforcement, given [that] current legislation is not set up for this.”

…

A number of sex attacks have been reported in Horizon Worlds, the free VR game released by Facebook owner Meta.

Okay.

Well.

Okay.

There are no benefits to allowing women to speak in public

]]> Zuckerberg’s Meta Fires 11,000 Employees to Have More Money for Metaverse https://www.anglinarchive.com/2022/11/10/zuckerbergs-meta-fires-11000-employees-to-have-more-money-for-metaverse/ Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0000

.@facebook's parent company @Meta sacks 11,000 employees in one of the biggest layoffs so far this year. It is also the first layoff in the company's 18 year history. Mark Zuckerberg took the onus and said his over-optimism led to over-staffing. @Shilparanipeta reports pic.twitter.com/tBAqOor3NJ

— CNBC-TV18 (@CNBCTV18News) November 9, 2022

Previously: Mark Zuckerberg’s VR Metaverse Project Failing Spectacularly, Bringing Entire Company Down

There so much money going into Metaverse now, it must be way better than Second Life (which is was ripped-off of).

Second Life was really good, but if you’re spending billions, you must be able to make a better game.

As soon as life gets much, much worse, people will be ready to put on these nausea-inducing headsets and slide deep into the very boring Metaverse.

Reuters:

Meta Platforms Inc said on Wednesday it would cut more than 11,000 jobs, or 13% of its workforce, in one of the year’s biggest layoffs as the Facebook parent battles soaring costs from its push into the metaverse amid a weak advertising market.

The mass layoffs, the first in Meta’s 18-year history, follow thousands of job cuts at other major tech companies including Elon Musk-owned Twitter and Microsoft Corp.

The pandemic-led boom that boosted tech companies and their valuations has turned into a bust this year in the face of decades-high inflation and rapidly rising interest rates.

“Not only has online commerce returned to prior trends, but the macroeconomic downturn, increased competition, and ads signal loss have caused our revenue to be much lower than I’d expected,” Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg said in a message to employees.

“I got this wrong, and I take responsibility for that.”

The company also plans to cut discretionary spending and extend its hiring freeze through the first quarter. But it did not specify the impacted regions or the expected cost savings from the moves.

It now expects 2023 expenses of as much as $100 billion, compared with up to $100 billion previously, with more of the resources being focused on areas such as artificial intelligence, ads, business platforms and the metaverse.

…

Wall Street has been losing patience over Zuckerberg’s enormous and experimental bets on his metaverse project, a shared virtual world, with one shareholder recently calling the investments “super-sized and terrifying”.

Concerns over the spending spree have wiped off more than two-thirds of Meta’s market value so far this year. But its shares rose 4.5% to $100.80 before the bell on Wednesday.

“The market is breathing a sigh of relief that Meta’s management or Zuckerberg specifically seems to be heeding some advice, which is you need to take some of the steam out of the growing expenditure bill,” Hargreaves Lansdown analyst Sophie Lund-Yates said.

She, however, added that “it does not quite tally that you’re going to try and increase efficiency at the same time as chasing something as ambitious and as tenuous as the metaverse”.

 

It’s not only ambitious, it’s a bad game.

No one likes this VR stuff. It’s just a novelty.

I guess you can say that it’s intended to be a virtual world for when the brain implants come out. That might make sense. But there is no reason to believe these brain implants aren’t going to cause serious mental illness and be proven totally nonviable as anything other than an aid for cripples (you should be able to hook up artificial limbs, I think – but the idea of totally connecting the brain to a computer is just obviously going to cause psychosis).

What I don’t understand is why it costs so much money. The Metaverse is literally Second Life. The graphics are not impressive. Why does it cost billions of dollars?

]]> Mark Zuckerberg’s VR Metaverse Project Failing Spectacularly, Bringing Entire Company Down https://www.anglinarchive.com/2022/10/27/mark-zuckerbergs-vr-metaverse-project-failing-spectacularly-bringing-entire-company-down/ Thu, 27 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0000

Meta just had its worst revenue decline in its history.

Get out of the metaverse, and get back to the real world. pic.twitter.com/yBM40DmkD7

— Otavio (Tavi) Costa (@TaviCosta) October 26, 2022


All of the various “Second Life” type video games failed.

VR sets are expensive and they make you ill.

Why did anyone think “Metaverse” was a good idea?

Reuters:

Wall Street is losing patience over Meta boss Mark Zuckerberg’s enormous and experimental bets on his metaverse project that helped drive up the company’s overall costs by a fifth in the third quarter.

Investors rushed to dump Meta Platforms Inc’s stock after hours, pushing it down 20% and wiping $67 billion off its market value after the company posted its fourth straight decline in quarterly profit.

The Facebook-parent said its overall expenses could rise as much as 16% next year and anticipates that operating losses at Reality Labs – the unit responsible for bringing the metaverse to life – “will grow significantly” next year.

One Meta shareholder had recently voiced concerns calling the company’s investments “super-sized and terrifying”. Analysts on Wednesday called them “confusing and confounding” and Meta’s inability to cut costs “extremely disturbing”.

On a post-earnings conference call, Jefferies analyst Brent Thill asked executives: “I think kind of summing up how investors are feeling right now is that there are just too many experimental bets versus proven bets on the core … I think everyone would love to hear why you think this pays off.”

In the July-September quarter, losses at Reality Labs ballooned to a whopping $3.67 billion from $2.63 billion a year earlier. Revenue nearly halved.

“It would be a mistake for us to not focus on any of these areas that will be fundamentally important to our future,” Zuckerberg said on the call.

“I know that sometimes when we ship a product … people say: ‘Hey, you’re spending all this money, and you’ve produced this thing,’ and I think that’s not really the right way to think about it.”

“…we’re doing leading work that will become … eventually mature products at different cadences in different periods of time over the next five to 10 years.”

He spoke about the company’s various efforts, including a recently unveiled virtual and mixed reality headset called Quest Pro that is priced at $1,500 and a social metaverse platform where people can express themselves via avatars.

He said Meta is investing in two other areas: augmented reality and neural interfaces.

 

Yeah. Presumably, the plan was some kind of literal Matrix type thing made to tie in with the “neural interface” brain chips that are being developed.

But it would have been easy to develop this and keep it on the back burner, rather than putting it front and center and blowing all of this capital on it. That was just stupid.

It was a retarded business move.

We may actually see the fall of Facebook. Zuckerberg has failed at literally every point he needed to innovate. His only successes, other than stealing Facebook and launching it in the first place, was buying out other companies. He actually managed to destroy many companies he bought, but there was success with instagram and WhatsApp. He basically destroyed the latter. Aside from failing to innovate at all to compete with Telegram, he for whatever reason announced that he was going to start reading everyone’s messages. I have talked to normies who say they stopped using it over privacy concerns.

Elon Musk is planning on making Twitter a much bigger project than it currently is. Musk is also working on a brain chip, but he didn’t do something stupid like launch a VR world.

The big question now is: will Facebook get a government bailout?

]]> Elon Musk’s Neuralink Monkey Test Subjects Face “Extreme Suffering,” Go Insane and Die https://www.anglinarchive.com/2022/02/16/elon-musks-neuralink-monkey-test-subjects-face-extreme-suffering-go-insane-and-die/ Wed, 16 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0000

Elon Musk has allegedly gone full-Fauci against monkeys.

But I don’t remember the “Occupy Democrats” Twitter account calling for beagle rights when Fauci’s sick behavior was revealed.

The monkey plays pong with its mind, then dies a horrible death.

Elon Musk gets angry at the other oligarchs.

But the reason he does that is because he thinks they’re not doing utopian futurism correctly.

The Guardian:

Elon Musk’s brain chip company Neuralink is defending itself against claims that its researchers abused monkeys in the testing of its products.

Neuralink – which hopes to create a revolutionary interface that would allow humans to control devices with their brains – said in a statement on Monday that its research animals were “respected and honored by our team”. The company was responding to allegations that the animals were tortured and left to die in horrific experiments at its facilities.

In a lengthy complaint filed with the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM) said the research caused “extreme suffering” in its test subjects, who “had their brains mutilated in shoddy experiments and were left to suffer and die”. PCRM is a non-profit advocacy organization that promotes a plant-based diet and alternatives to animal testing.

The complaint targets a partnership between Neuralink and the University of California, Davis that was carried out between 2017 and 2020, in which researchers implanted a device “approximately the size of a quarter” into the skull of macaque monkey test subjects.

PCRM obtained hundreds of pages of health records, necropsy reports and other documents related to the $1.4m partnership through California’s open records laws. It said the documents reveal the monkeys suffered “extreme psychological distress” from the “crude surgeries”.

In the complaint, PCRM said Neuralink used a substance known as “BioGlue” that destroyed parts of the monkeys’ brains. It described animals exhibiting substantial psychological effects from the experiments, including anxiety, vomiting, poor appetite, hair loss and self-mutilating behavior including removing their own fingers.

…

Musk has previously stated that Neuralink’s brain chip technology could have major implications for people with disabilities, tweeting it would “let a paralyzed person tweet faster than a person using their thumbs on a smartphone”, for example.

Imagine being so naive that you believe powerful people invest billions to do this kind of research in order to improve the lives of paralyzed people.

It’s like believing those sign languagers on political speeches are about the deaf.

]]> Metaverse to Enforce Social Distance Between Virtual Reality Avatars https://www.anglinarchive.com/2022/02/05/metaverse-to-enforce-social-distance-between-virtual-reality-avatars/ Sat, 05 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0000

I would say “I will figure out a way to harass people and cause them to commit suicide, just as I always have.”

But I’m not going in this metaverse, just like I’m not buying GTA 6.

The Guardian:

Mark Zuckerberg’s virtual reality business is to introduce a mandatory distance between people’s digital avatars after warnings that the social media tycoon’s plans for a metaverse will lead to a new wave of online harassment.

Zuckerberg, the founder of Facebook, is making a multibillion-dollar bet on VR as the next source of growth for his empire but his strategy has already been dogged by warnings that virtual worlds are rife with abuse.

In December a user testing Horizon Worlds, a VR app owned by Zuckberg’s Meta business, complained of being groped online and called for a protective bubble around their avatar, or digital representation of themselves. “Sexual harassment is no joke on the regular internet but being in VR adds another layer that makes the event more intense,” said the user.

Meta announced on Friday that it is introducing personal boundaries on two VR apps: Horizon Worlds, where people can meet fellow VR users and design their own world; and Horizon Venues, which hosts VR events such as comedy shows or music gigs. The company said the distance between people will be the VR equivalent of four feet.

“A personal boundary prevents anyone from invading your avatar’s personal space. If someone tries to enter your personal boundary, the system will halt their forward movement as they reach the boundary,” said the company. Meta is introducing the 4ft boundary as a default setting and will consider further changes such as letting people set their own boundaries.

“We think this will help to set behavioural norms – and that’s important for a relatively new medium like VR,” said Meta.

That kind of kills immersion, no?

I mean, if I walked up to some bitch in real life to harass her and my movement was blocked by a force field, it would kill my vibes.

The question hinges on whether or not this VR headset will work like it does in scifi.

There is currently no evidence that it actually will.

]]> Life in VR Will Be The Right Life Choice, US “Philosopher” Says https://www.anglinarchive.com/2022/01/18/life-in-vr-will-be-the-right-life-choice-us-philosopher-says/ Tue, 18 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0000

Virtual reality vaccine! pic.twitter.com/WDfcldBexl

— Shami BaAhamataza (@Handysook1) November 10, 2021

This seems perfectly reasonable.

Real life certainly isn’t doing anyone any favors.

What choice do we have but a nonstop free of porno and 3D Marvel movies?

We have no choice, philosophy (i.e., The Science) says.

The Guardian:

It is hard to imagine humans spending their lives in virtual reality when the experience amounts to waving your arms about in the middle of the lounge with a device the size of a house brick strapped to your face.

But this is where humanity is heading, says the philosopher David Chalmers, who argues for embracing the fate. Advances in technology will deliver virtual worlds that rival and then surpass the physical realm. And with limitless, convincing experiences on tap, the material world may lose its allure, he says.

Chalmers, a professor of philosophy and neural science at New York University, makes the case to embrace VR in his new book, Reality+. Renowned for articulating “the hard problem” of consciousness – which inspired Tom Stoppard’s play of the same name – Chalmers sees technology reaching the point where virtual and physical are sensorily the same and people live good lives in VR.

“A common way of thinking about virtual realities is that they’re somehow fake realities, that what you perceive in VR isn’t real. I think that’s wrong,” he told the Guardian. “The virtual worlds we’re interacting with can be as real as our ordinary physical world. Virtual reality is genuine reality.”

…

On the point of philosophy, Chalmers argues that even today’s virtual worlds are “real”. A conversation in VR is a real conversation, he says. The objects in the virtual worlds are real too, he asserts, just made of bits instead of quarks and electrons. As virtual worlds become rich and convincing we will build virtual societies, take on virtual jobs, and have motivations, desires and goals that play out in those environments. “Most of the factors that make life meaningful are going to be there in virtual worlds,” he says. “There’s no good reason to think that life in VR will be meaningless or valueless.”

It is unlikely everyone will turn to VR, and some people, Chalmers says, will still value sheer physicality.

“There may be a sense of authenticity in interacting in our original biological form. But it’s hard to see why sheer physicality should make the difference between a meaningful life and a meaningless life,” he writes. “In the long term, virtual worlds may have most of what is good about the nonvirtual world. Given all the ways in which virtual worlds may surpass the nonvirtual world, life in virtual worlds will often be the right life to choose.”

Buy the ticket and take the ride!

In fact, you don’t even have to pay for the ticket – the government is giving free tickets to this ride!

It’s the opportunity of a lifetime!

]]> VR Sex Game: Would You Hit That? https://www.anglinarchive.com/2021/08/27/vr-sex-game-would-you-hit-that/ Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0000

I bought one single Hentai game as a joke to play on a stream like two years ago, and Steam is still shilling hardcore sex games at me.

The Hentai game I bought wasn’t even a hardcore sex game. It was an old school platformer that just had like, a 16 bit nude character that would get raped by monsters when you died.

I don’t have to explain anything to you!

But yes: if you buy one light Hentai game on Steam, they will shill sex games at you for the rest of your life.

Anyway, I’m trying to keep track on the VR sex games, as I think that eventually, these are going to get really realistic, and that will really cause people to give up on life even worse.

Why not take the vaxx if you’ve got a VR gf?

Why not turn into a completely fat slob who never leaves his house?

What reason is there to do anything, if you’ve got a VR gf?

So: the latest VR sex game is called VR Hot.

Again, I don’t play these games. I also don’t watch porn. I recommend everyone keep to that philosophy.

But the game popped up on my feed. Most of the VR girlfriends are what you would expect: vaguely Asian-looking with big tits.

Pretty normal.

Asian women are much more attractive than white women – however, they have small breasts. Therefore, the fantasy is an Asian woman with huge breasts.

The most popular VR sex game is Japanese, featuring a gook schoolgirl with massive donkers.

However, I was utterly shocked by this VR girlfriend:

Listen:

  • That is one of the girls advertised!
  • I saw that bitch’s face before I even clicked on the Steam page for the game!

I said to myself:

  • What is going on here?
  • Who in the universe would have a fantasy about a fat short-haired pig?

Having thought about it, I realized the answer was that probably a lot of men fantasize about fat short-haired pigs.

You see: men’s sexuality is completely out of whack. Absolutely.

Absolutely.

Basically, every man under the age of 60 has either:

  • A single mother, or
  • A otherwise domineering mother who controlled and humiliated his father

When you get down to under 40, this is literally universal.

I don’t really think I need to explain that. Just think about it for a second. Think about your own mother, then think about the mothers of every man you know.

So, you’re asking: how does that relate to a man’s fantasy being a short-haired pig?

Well, just wait and relax, because I’m going to tell you soon.

Here’s the deal:

  • A son of a domineering mother has zero self-confidence, because you have to get your self-confidence from your father, and he can’t give you that if he is absent or being oppressed by your mother.
  • A son of a domineering mother learns very early on that his survival is dependent on the whims of a powerful female who controls him, and decides whether he eats.
  • Over the course of his development, the son develops a twisted and pathological relationship with the mother, in which his entire emotional universe surrounds her approval. He becomes manic because her approval is not really based on anything other than her own manic emotions.
  • Because his survival as a small child is based on the unhinged emotions of this manic woman, he develops an ingrained neural rewards system wherein his brain rewards him for receiving the approval of a manic woman.

Now that I’ve said it, you all know it’s true.

Conversely, if you’re raised in a patriarchy, your father protects you, and ensures that you’re fed. Even if you displease him, he doesn’t threaten to stop feeding you or leave you in a parking lot. That protection from the father, and the belief that a father has in his son, builds your personal self-esteem, and you seek to become like your father.

This is all just obvious, and it is the underlying problem of our entire society: all of these flimsy, pathetic men were the product of a domineering mother. After the revolutions of the 1960s, all women were “empowered” by the basic nature of the situation, and seized control.

Unless you were born on some rural farm somewhere that had no connection to civilization, then — no, you know what. You didn’t escape this. You didn’t. We all experienced this. Every one of us.

Which, by the way, does mean that your mother was not *personally* responsible. If every woman did the same thing, then we can’t hardly hold them all *personally* responsible. This was a social phenomenon and clearly, if you give women the ability to control men, they will do it, in every situation, no matter what.

Islam is right about women.

Maybe you were better off with a single/divorced mother, as you didn’t have to witness your father being controlled and ultimately destroyed by your mother. I think that’s probably true. Most of the people I’ve met with right in them didn’t have a father around.

Men have responded to this situation differently:

  • Some men emulate the mother, and become homosexual.
  • Some men simply seek to repeat the situation with the mother with a woman, finding a woman to be their new mommy (this is what a “boyfriend” is – he is a lost puppy seeking a mommy).
  • Some men try to be “cool guys” and “ladies’ men,” mixing homosexual behavior patterns with approval-seeking (the most extreme form of this is the self-identifying “pick up artist,” but all men who seek to have sex with a lot of non-prostitute women are seeking as much approval as possible).

Those are the main types. You’ll find that an incel is usually a failed attempt at the second type. Most of them say they want a girlfriend to “love them” and to “care for them.” This is just a very obvious way of saying “I want a new mommy.”

The list of issues that result from the lack of confidence is literally infinite, but here are a few examples of things men do to try to deal with the hole in their souls where they were supposed to have self-esteem:

  • Get tattoos
  • Develop substance abuse problems
  • Work out and become yoked or take steroids and become yoked
  • Become obsessed with money
  • Buy an oversized truck
  • Do cunnilingus
  • Talk about giving women orgasms and say it’s really important to pleasure a woman during sex (honestly, I would rather a man tell me he is a child molester than that he loves giving women orgasms)
  • Develop an aggressive and angry personality, where they get in people’s faces and so on (tough guy)
  • Become effeminate, taking on the social behaviors of women (heterosexual men who do this actually are more feminine than homosexuals, the latter having their own entirely different social order)
  • Develop an “individualist” or “artist” identity, where they obsess over finding some hidden meaning in life to compensate for the obvious meaning in life they don’t have, which is a normal patriarchal family – they also pretend to be “deep” in order to try to impress women. (These men are especially horrible, as a result of totally unwarranted self-importance and the belief they are especially gifted in finding hidden meaning, but they just haven’t stumbled on it yet. They often become vindictive when they begin to realize that their illusory specialness will never be appreciated. This is the personality of the compulsive-obsessive journalist, for example. I’ve had several of these trying to ruin my life as a way to demonstrate their value to women.)
  • Become a neo-Nazi

Regardless: in every situation, you learn that the woman is the source of all power in the universe. Therefore, it becomes natural to serve women, and to acknowledge their dominant role in society. It’s a Stockholm syndrome that is so ubiquitous that no one notices it. Men just assume that all of this bizarre stuff, and the underlying lack of self-esteem, must be natural because everyone is doing it. Virtually all of the people who remember something else are already dead.

A fat short-haired pig is a symbol of feminine power, so it isn’t surprising that some men would sexually fetishize this.

This probably doesn’t happen to very many men, but apparently it happens to enough that the A/B testing of this game turned up enough upvotes for a short-haired sow that they included her in the promo material.

There are varying degrees of this.

I remember when Sports Illustrated did their first “plus size” model, Ashley Graham, and I wrote about this cow.

People responded saying “oh, but I don’t like skinny girls – this is basically my perfect woman!”

I naturally told those people that they are sickening perverts.

But you know, this goes back to the thing with gays: you can’t control your sexual attraction mechanism. Apparently, you can maybe become progressively more perverse through pornography and fetishism, but the underlying sexual drive is going to be there, and you can’t really change that.

That goes for much of the damage that is done by the mother. Like it or not, your personality and identity were shaped when you were a child, and your mother was in control of that shaping, and that is going to loom over you for the rest of your life. If you have children, a shadow of it will loom over them as well. That’s just life.

The best thing to do is to try to understand it, and then force yourself to buck the trend as much as possible.

You can also set up rules for yourself. A basic one is that you never want to be some bitch’s “boyfriend.” That is like being a small dog. It is humiliating and dehumanizing. The purpose of romantic relationships is sex and/or children. It is not “friendship” or “companionship.” You do not need a female “partner.” That is weird and gay. It’s literally gay – who enjoys the company of women in a friendship setting? It’s homosexuals and otherwise very effeminate men. If you get caught being the boyfriend, you’ve really failed badly, and you need to reevaluate your life.

In general, you need to evaluate all of your interactions with women.

Most of all, I think that Jesse Lee Peterson is 100% correct in the need to forgive your mother. It’s the only way to release all of that anger inside. The anger holds the place of self-esteem, as it is the only defense mechanism a small boy has to protect his ego. When you release that, you can begin to build self-esteem.

In forgiving her, you acknowledge her guilt in wrecking your entire life, permanently, but you also acknowledge that she wouldn’t have done it on purpose. Something happened with women, when they got the option of having this power, they all just came totally unglued. It’s 100% of women.

There is nothing more exhausting than this boomer trope of “there are good women out there.” There are no “good women” or “bad women.” Women do not have personal agency. Their behavior is entirely determined by their environment, and therefore they cannot be good or bad.

Under the Taliban, there are no feminists. Women are forced to wear burkas, and they have no say in anything. They cannot be feminists.

The opposite is true in the modern West. There are no non-feminists. They all have power at their fingertips, and they cannot help but use it to wreck everything around them. They cannot be non-feminists.

If you understand this, you can understand what the Jew social-engineers were trying to do in Afghanistan: they were trying to kick-start feminism, which would completely unravel the entire social order, and bring about every bad thing. With women’s liberation, you get all of the bad things – not just because of the behavior of liberated women, but because of the behavior of men who are raised by liberated women. Liberating women creates a death spiral, where all of the worst things must necessarily happen.

The Taliban can say Allah triumphed, if they want to. That’s their perception of order.

What actually triumphed, however, was masculinity and patriarchy.

That is the only possible victory anyone is going to have. We need to fight for masculinity, above all.

It is shocking and bizarre that so many “right-wingers” do not stand up for men and masculinity. It’s actually confusing. I don’t exactly understand what they are even fighting for at all. Multiculturalism, homosexuality, socialism, and all of the other things that right-wingers are opposed to are the direct result of women’s liberation.

Jews are only a tiny percentage of the population, and most people in the West have never even known a Jew. The process of Judaism was unleashing women. Women will create every bad thing, once they are unleashed. They serve as a personal army for the Jews.

Remember this: “right-wingers” who promote women’s liberation only care about women’s liberation. They are necessarily saying:

“I’m against Jews, multiculturalism, homosexuality, etc. – but I am not willing to sacrifice the liberation of women to end these things. We have to figure out a way to solve these problems while preserving women’s liberation.”

If you don’t believe me, then find one and press them on it. They will try to debate the meaning of “feminism” and “liberation” and say they support “traditional families.”

However, if you nail them down, and ask, “are you willing to return to pre-20th century gender norms, where women were prohibited from being a part of public society and be treated as property by men?”, they will tell you they are unwilling to do that, and that we have to find some other solution, wherein we get rid of every other aspect of modernity, but maintain women’s liberation.

That means that the whole thing is entirely meaningless. Any right-winger who endorses women’s rights is simply jerking off, and doesn’t care about anything he is saying. The only thing he actually cares about is the same thing that all other sons of domineering mothers care about: preserving female dominance of society.

I’ve been through all of this with these people. Obviously, the neo-Nazis are the most extreme feminists on the right, often going even further than the left on the question of women’s liberation, but it’s everywhere. If they’re not talking about the woman problem, then they support it. There is no other reason not to talk about the single most important issue in all of the world.

]]> Even the VR Star Wars Guy is Black! https://www.anglinarchive.com/2020/12/10/even-the-vr-star-wars-guy-is-black/ Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0000 It is official: everyone in every advertisement is black.

This is an ad I just saw on reddit:

That is an advertisement both for the Oculus Quest 2 VR headset, and for Star Wars: Tales From the Galaxy’s Edge.

Released in October, the Quest 2 is one of the first generation of realistically affordable VR headsets, retailing for around $300. This is compared to Valve’s Index, which sells for over $700.

We know that VR can never be more than a novelty item, because if you play it for more than 15 minutes, you get motion sickness and vomit. This price drop theoretically makes a novelty item maybe worth the cost to show to your friends. Thus, there’s been a significant advertising blitz, as people are thinking “well, this might be fun to show people at a dinner party” (even though dinner parties are now illegal and will be for the foreseeable future, and if people were switching this headset back and forth at a party they would all get the virus).

Price drop aside: this is not an item made for black people. Black people do play video games, but they don’t buy novelty items.

They also definitely do not play Star Wars video games, or have any interest in Star Wars, on the whole, as a rule.

Of course, I’m sure there is some black guy who will buy this item. Somewhere, there is some black guy who thinks it would be cool to have a VR headset to show to his friends, or maybe is too stupid to have read the literature about how you can only play a VR headset for 15 minutes at a time. But this is a fraction of the audience for this device, let alone the pairing with Star Wars.

Advertisement is fundamentally about looking at people as groups, because it is about maximizing sales. In the language of advertising, you speak of certain “markets,” which are literally demographics.

Here’s an article from a marketing site about how to target advertisement. It lists the following demographic “target populations”:

  • Age
  • Gender and Marital status
  • Ethnicity or Race
  • Income, Education and Occupation

So, if you’re creating an ad, your target demographic is going to be something relatively tight, such as “educated, unmarried heterosexual white males from a middle class background between the ages of 22 and 31.”

If you surveyed the people who bought a VR headset this year in the United States, what percentage of them do you think would be black?

I’m going to say that it would likely be less than 1%. It would certainly not be any more than 2%. That is without adding the fact that this is a Star Wars themed ad.

We should also note that advertisement is obsessively data-driven, relying on statistics more so than any other industry. They are constantly doing split tests to see what a certain market responds to. With internet advertisement, they are able to do nonstop split tests very easily, and they eat up this data, and do not make ads without using it.

So why does this ad feature a black man?

Well, there are only two options:

  1. They have data showing that middle class white males between the ages of 16 and 36 like seeing black people in advertisements, and seeing black people makes them more likely to purchase products, or
  2. The decision to feature a black man in this ad was made for reasons other than a desire to sell more product

Ultimately, it has to be number 2.

Think about it: even if there is a certain number of whites who are shown to prefer blacks in their advertisements, they are not the majority of whites who would be considering buying this product.

Advertisement is by its nature speaking to the subconscious mind, and the subconscious mind is going to be a lot more racist than the conscious mind. So the number of white men who would respond better to an ad with a black man is frighteningly small. Probably on par with the number of white men who would invite a black man in their home to have sex with their girlfriend. Probably, it is the exact same target population.

There is a push in the advertisement industry to replace all white people with black people, or other colorfuls (though frankly, it is primarily African blacks). This is blatant, and obvious, to the point where they apparently want people to subconsciously absorb the idea that black people are the normal population, and white people are aberrant.

Oculus is owned by Facebook, which as you know, is owned by the Jew Mark Zuckerberg.

The fact that this advertisement does not target its target demographic means that it does not serve its full purpose as an advertisement. That means that Facebook is sacrificing money in order to push an anti-white racial agenda.

Normal people are noticing the blacked advertising barrage. This is an issue you can bring up with normal people. Don’t be weird about it. But you can bring this up without seeming weird, if you’re in a conversation with someone about what is going on in our society. Everyone has some vague understanding of the advertisement industry, and everyone kind of understands that they are ultimately losing money by choosing to feature only blacks in every ad.

The concept of mega-corporations sacrificing money in order to push an overtly anti-white agenda shakes people. When people see it, moreso when they have someone else confirm that they’ve seen it too, it sends a bit of a chill down their spine as they cannot help but picture the larger implications of this. Maybe they don’t picture the specifics. But they automatically get some idea. It can be a breakthrough moment for people.

Just remember: don’t be weird.

]]> So About This New $1,000 Half-Life Game… https://www.anglinarchive.com/2019/11/23/so-about-this-new-1000-half-life-game/ Sat, 23 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0000 Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 23, 2019

A trailer for a new Half-Life game has finally been released. Fourteen years later.

The game is not called “Half-Life 3,” but is instead called “Half-Life: Alyx.” Because you don’t play as Dr. Gordon Freeman.

You play as Alyx Vance.

The chick.

I don’t know about you, but this isn’t really what I was hoping for.

It’s possible that there are no intentional political undertones to this, and we just assume there are intentional political undertones because it feels like everything has intentional political undertones.

I’m okay with girls in the lead role in video games. I enjoyed the original Tomb Raider games, and I am a big Jill Valentine fan. Not opposed to Claire Redfield either.

But Gordon was the defining character of the series. And I want to play as Gordon.

Oh – and it’s a prequel. Which is not what I was hoping for when the last game, Half Life 2: Episode Two, left on a cliffhanger.

And here’s the other thing: Half-Life: Alyx is entirely in VR.

There is only VR.

There is no non-VR option for this game.

So, I hope you have a little extra cash lying around.

Just for anyone who’s unclear – this is not an independent system. This is a headset, you plug it into a computer.

A computer with some pretty heavy minimum requirements.

So, I don’t know what the deal is here.

To be fair, Valve has always been on the cutting edge, and they may genuinely be trying to make VR work, and this is the only way they can do it. But as there are no other games that anyone wants to play on this headset, you are effectively paying $1,000 for a single video game, then hoping something else comes out to make it worth the purchase.

Also to be fair, the trailer does look fantastic. I think everyone who watches it who loves the original games is at least for a split second going to think about whether or not they have the ability to scrounge up $1,000.

Also to be completely fair, I can’t possibly be fair here, because I am not a believer in any coming VR revolution, anymore than I am a believer in the imminent development of general artificial intelligence.

And yes, those things are comparable and in fact similar.

Both predictions strike me as similar to when, in the 1960s, people were saying we’d have cities on Mars by the 1990s.

VR and GAI are theoretical technological revolutions that are assumed to be coming at a date not too far in the future, even whilst both have obvious, insurmountable problems blocking their implementation.

With VR, the problem is largely that people simply don’t like it. It makes them dizzy and disoriented. So even if Valve has solved the mechanics of the problem, are they able to make this into anything other than a luxury novelty?

And if so, does this mean that Valve has gone the way of so many other once great video game companies in becoming a politicized customer abuse machine?

Certainly, we can’t make that accusation yet. Time will tell. It could well be that Half-Life: Alyx is worth the $1,000 for those who can pay it, and after the first wave of wealthy and/or devoted gamers buy the system, it will allow Valve to put money into figuring out how to make it cheaper – while other companies also rush in to compete, and further drive down the price due to market competition – and in five years we’ll all be thanking them for ushering in the next era of video games, in the same way we did after the release of the first Half-Life.

It might be some hot stuff.

I’m just saying: I’ve been burned before. When I was a kid, I never would have expected Blizzard would become what it has become. So yes. I am skeptical about Valve trying to sell me the most expensive video game ever made.

I won’t ever be buying this, because I am disgusted by VR and furthermore I do not have $1,000. Obviously, you would have to be a lunatic to pre-purchase it, even if you’re a billionaire. But I do eagerly await the reviews.

Half-Life: Alyx is scheduled to be released in March of 2020.

]]>