Do they deliberately hire the wimpiest blacks they can find to guard this place?

I can’t stand this global warming bullshit anymore. I just can’t take it. I can’t think about it. It makes me sick.

At least with the Jews and the homos, I can understand the motivations clearly.

What do the warmists want? Insofar as I have any idea, they want to feel like heroes by serving a stupid, nonsensical agenda pushed by the most powerful people in the world to the detriment of the most powerless people in the world.

How does that make sense?

Washington Examiner:

The Constitution became the latest historic item to be targeted by climate protesters on Wednesday after two protesters dumped red powder on the document’s case.

The National Archives said the protesters were immediately detained after the incident, which occurred around 2:30 p.m., and they are recommending the culprits be prosecuted to the “fullest extent of the law.”

“The National Archives Rotunda is the sanctuary for our nation’s founding documents,” Colleen Shogan, archivist of the United States, said in a statement. “The [documents] are here for all Americans to view and understand the principles of our nation. We take such vandalism very seriously.”

Other items in the National Archives rotunda include the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence, but neither of the cases protecting those documents was affected.

The rotunda will be closed on Wednesday and Thursday for cleaning, but no damage has been done to the Constitution itself. The rest of the archives building that is accessible to the public will be open on Thursday.

The protesters were part of the climate group Declare Emergency, which claims they are trying to stop the world from ending due to climate change.

“We don’t want the end of civilization but that’s the path we’re currently on,” the group posted to X in response to the arrests. “Declare Emergency’s nonviolent civil disobedience is love in action everyday, not just on Valentine’s Day.”

These people should just be executed outright, hanged in the public square after a very short trial.

This is obscene beyond belief.

It is the most brutal nonsense to ever occur.

Declare Emergency’s unofficial anthem, from their own channel

Oh so you only have daughters, and you’re like “oh I guess I don’t have to cut any of my kids’ dicks off because none of them have dicks!”

That’s correct. If you only have daughters, you don’t have to cut any dicks.

However: not so fast.

You are required by law to cut your daughters’ tits off.

Breitbart:

Burberry is the latest fashion label to feature transgender models, showing a shirtless female-to-male model with visible double mastectomy scars in a recent Valentine’s Day campaign.

The campaign shows the half-naked, tattooed trans model embracing a biological female model who is wearing what appears to be a Burberry top. Burberry posted the image to its official Instagram account, where it has been inundated by a deluge of negative user comments.

.@Burberry’s latest ad is promoting young physically healthy women getting double mastectomies. pic.twitter.com/XcmwD1Sdat

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) January 25, 2023

Burberry joins a growing list of fashion brands and publications to feature transgender models. As Breitbart News reported in 2019, Victoria’s Secret announced that it had hired a transgender model for its runways — male-to-female Brazilian actress Valentina Sampaio.

The same year, Chanel Beauty announced that transgender model Teddy Quinlivan was the company’s new face.

Last year, New York Fashion Week featured a 10-year-old transgender model who walked the runway for fashion label Renacio.

The ubiquity of transgenderism belies the health risks associated with sex-change procedures and medication — rebranded as “gender-affirming care” by the mainstream media — especially for minors.

Listen up, parents: cut the tits.

It’s the law.

If you try to fight back, we’re gonna do you like we did the J6ers.

Valentine's Day can still be fun even if you broke up. Do you have information about a former (or current) partner involved in illegal gun activity? Let us know, and we will make sure it's a Valentine's Day to remember! Call 1-888-ATF-TIPS or email ATFTips@atf.gov. pic.twitter.com/OdDIPdIzkr

— ATF HQ (@ATFHQ) February 14, 2022

The feds posted a Valentine’s Day message encouraging vindictive women to snitch on their ex-boyfriends.

They promised that the ex would get a “present,” by which they mean they will send a small army to your house to kill your dog and arrest you at gunpoint.

I have… I have maybe never seen something this weird in my life. I guess I say that every day.

Here it is, outside of the tweet:

We often speak of how out of touch the establishment is, but apparently they are very in touch with the spitefulness and vindictiveness of women.

Obviously, of course, the tweet was put out by an affirmative action hire woman.

But I can guarantee – some bitch saw this tweet and called the ATF because their ex-boyfriend owns guns.

And even if the guns end up all being legal, the dogs are all still dead.

If the feds raid your house on a bad tip, they don’t apologize for killing your dog. They do not bring you a new puppy. They don’t even offer to help you bury the dog. They just leave the dead dog on your front lawn.

This really is the most obvious example I’ve seen so far of how the system leans on the debauched nature of women to push their anti-American, anti-white, anti-Christian, anti-freedom agenda.

It’s just like “hey, are you a vindictive, lonely bitch looking for revenge? We will kill your ex-boyfriend’s dog and maybe put him in prison too! Call us if he owns a gun!”

pic.twitter.com/8ZsCfBFBUB

— CIA (@CIA) February 14, 2021

The CIA posted a cute poem on Twitter for Valentine’s Day.

It really made me feel special and I’m glad the CIA loves me and cares for me.

The are really sweet people.

Glenn Greenwald should take the olive branch and realize that the CIA is friendly and loves us.

Think about the people who like this shit and fall for it. https://t.co/FpZ9MAwPJb

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) February 14, 2021

I for one accept the love of the CIA and hope that some day I think John Brennen is really a true romantic.

His girl is a really lucky lady.

Jill was my Valentine on Sunday, and she did not let me down.

She never has.

She has been with me since I was 12, and she’s always been perfect at 22.

I even wrote a song about her, but I changed her name so as not to embarrass her. She’s very modest, Jill.

It’s Valentine’s Day, AKA “Annual Vaginal Worship Day.” Every day in the Western world is “Vaginal Worship Day,” but this is a day when you’re supposed to worship vaginas extra hard.

I just want to take the time to remind everyone that “love” is not a real thing. It is just a chemical process in your brain that drives you to reproduce. What we now call “love” used to be called “sexual infatuation.”

Furthermore, the approval of women is not related to your masculinity, and in fact, at this point in history, masculinity may be inversely related to the ability to “get laid.”

Firstly, understand: a woman having sex with you is a way for her to show her approval of you. Unless it is a legitimate rape, that is all it is. She has decided that you are worthy of her vagina, based on some criteria she’s come up with. All you are proving when you get a woman to have sex with you is that you’ve gained her approval.

It must be understood that the only thing of value a woman has is her vagina. Therefore, anything a woman wishes to gain must be gain through leveraging the power of her vagina. Men want access to the vagina because they are driven by biology reproduce.

This biological drive to reproduce will cause the brain to create all sorts of chemicals in order to shape your behavior toward the goal of inserting you penis into the vagina of a woman who is attractive. Not that the things that you find attractive are signs of fertility or good genetics. Big breasts, strong butt and a thin waist are signs of fertility. Facial symmetry is a sign of good genetics.

When you feel a strong and even overwhelming “love” for a woman, this is simply your brain tricking you into thinking she is some great person, because your genetics want you to insert your penis into her vagina, then to feed her, then to stick around to provide for the children. She is not actually special, and in fact, she is stupid, selfish, vapid, amoral, vindictive, petty, solipsistic, and basically outright evil.

Nonetheless, you are driven by these emotions your brain has produced to seek her approval.

Historically, the things a woman approved of were things that were naturally noble. A woman approved of a man who was capable of acquiring resources, which she would then gain access to. Ultimately, what she approved of was social status, as social status implies an ability to acquire resources. Therefore, a man who was strong, well liked in the community, who was good at his profession, was considered attractive.

Thus, historically, getting the approval of a woman lined up more or less with being a good man. If you were strong, you worked hard, and people liked you, women would be interested in you. So it was fair to say that if a man had access to a lot of women to choose from, he was masculine.

Going all the way back to the tribal times, the guy with the most wives and concubines was the chief, and he would have had to have been alpha to hold that position and not be challenged for his leadership. Thus, there is an association in our minds with a man’s ability to attract women and his value as a man.

Now, however, everything has been flipped on its head, as a woman no longer requires a man to meet her basic needs. The government meets her needs through welfare programs and through affirmative action hiring schemes.

Furthermore, a woman is no longer shamed for having sex with more than one man, so she can shop around and see what she likes. When some women enter their late twenties, they will choose someone to settle down with. Others will try to keep the scam going indefinitely.

A woman now chooses who she has sex with arbitrarily, and because men still believe that a man who gets a lot of women is masculine, this has allowed women to redefine masculinity.

These are things that women have chosen in their sex partners, which has made many men believe this things are masculine:

1. Being on steroids
2. Having tattoos
3. Obsessively grooming the face
4. Engaging in bizarre fashion trends
5. Believing in various idiotic political causes
6. Being a violent criminal
7. Having feminine emotions
8. Acting like everything is a big joke all the time
9. Spending exorbitant amounts of money on worthless trinkets
10. Doing drugs

And so on.

Trying to please women, you end up as a totally unhinged lunatic.

None of those things are masculine, but men have begun to think these things are masculine, because women have begun to choose to have sex with men who exhibit these traits.

Men’s brains, as they seek vaginal access, see that men who are getting women exhibit these traits, and thus the traits become normative.

Women then continue to change their demands, and continue to make their “ideal man” into something weirder and weirder, and men continue to go along with it.

If you want to live a happy and successful life, you cannot do so while attempting to meet the shifting demands of women. This will actually drive you insane, and you may end up completely deranged.

The first thing you must do is understand that these very strong emotions you feel towards women are not real. They are a trick, created by chemicals in your brain, to drive you to reproduce. This trick would be fine and dandy in a functional society, and no one would ever even have to acknowledge that it is a trick. However, in this hellscape we live in now, when you start to feel these emotions towards a woman, you must say to yourself: “This is not real. I do not ‘love’ this woman, I barely even know her. Her approval of me is not important.”

If you can successfully get control of those emotions, you will be able to focus on your own life goals.

At some point later in your life, when you’ve accomplished your personal goals, you can go about trying to find a woman to breed with. But you should do that logically, in the same way you would buy a new (or, more likely, used” car. You should pick a woman based on her ability to fulfill what you need from her, and not based on some wacky emotional sensation that the chemicals in your brain is producing.

Valentine’s Day was created to sell greeting cards. Now, it’s being used to shame men.

Just keep your head clear. Don’t let these people get inside your head, and bombard you with lies about how your own self-worth is connected to this vaginal scam.

Moreover: be honest with other men who are having problems. Don’t go out there and act like you’re the big boss getting mad pussy.

And always, always, always put bros before hoes.

Men need to stick together, and take care of each other – not sell each other out for women’s approval. Selling out another man over a woman is probably the single most disgusting conceivable act on earth.

Work, take care of your health, take care of your money, take care of your family and friends. Focus on those things. Eventually, the stuff with women will come together.

Until then, remember that having sex with a prostitute is a much lesser sin than masturbation. Having sex with a prostitute is still a sin, however.

Pictured: average teenage girl in a relationship.

This is obviously the consequence of teaching men not to rape and telling women about how they were constantly raped in the past. It’s payback for all of the horrors that the Female Race has suffered at the hands of men.

Now it’s their turn to abuse.

Study Finds:

Defined as using technology to repeatedly harass a love interest, partner, or crush in order to coerce, control, intimidate, threaten, or just plain old annoy, digital dating abuse has developed into a disturbingly common phenomenon. The research team analyzed over 2,200 U.S. middle and high school students, and 28.1% admitted they had been subjected to a form of online dating abuse over the past year.

Perhaps surprisingly, the study also noted that boys (32.3%) appear to be experiencing this type of abuse more often than girls (23.6%). Across all variations, boys were more likely to have experienced a form of digital dating abuse. In fact, boys were also more likely to have experienced physical aggression from their partner. Besides these gender fluctuations, researchers didn’t find any significant demographic differences regarding rate of digital abuse among varying races, ages, or sexual orientations.

In all, 2,218 adolescents between the ages of 12 and 17 who had been in a romantic relationship took part in the study. Examples of digital abuse given by participants included their partner looking through their phone without permission, having their phone flat out stolen by their partner, being threatened via text, their partner posting something embarrassing or hurtful about them online, or their partner posting a private image online without their consent.

Besides online abuse, 35.9% of participants also said they’ve been a victim of offline dating abuse (being pushed, shoved, hit, threatened physically, called names, etc).

“Specific to heterosexual relationships, girls may use more violence on their boyfriends to try to solve their relational problems, while boys may try to constrain their aggressive impulses when trying to negotiate discord with their girlfriends,” says Sameer Hinduja, Ph.D., lead author and a professor in the School of Criminology and Criminal Justice within FAU’s College for Design and Social Inquiry, and co-director of the Cyberbullying Research Center, in a release. “It’s unfortunate to be thinking about dating abuse as we approach one of the most romantic days of the year, Valentine’s Day. However, it is clear that digital dating abuse affects a meaningful proportion of teenagers, and we need to model and educate youth on what constitutes a healthy, stable relationship and what betrays a dysfunctional, problematic one.”

Predictably, there was a major connection between being harassed online by a partner and also experiencing abuse in person. In all, 81% of students who had experienced digital dating abuse also reported being subjected to more traditional forms of romantic harassment.

Okay, so here’s how women work, basically:

Women are vessels. You either fill them with your seed or demons fill them with their whims.

In other words: if men don’t control women, women are controlled by demons.

We’ve really allowed ourselves to be walked into a corner here with all of these Respect Women laws that keep men from slapping these whores into submission.

Now, if we’re talking about submission, one weird trick that is one hundred percent guaranteed to work on all women all of the time without you having to raise your hand at them is to just literally grab them by the pussy.

Pictured: the face they make when they’re grabbed by the pussy.

Grabbing women by the pussy is actually probably the easiest non-violent way to control them.

The moment your fingers reach her genitals she enters what I like to call Can’t Even Mode, which is a state of being where women literally cannot even do anything about what transpires around them.

But we’ve also allowed ourselves to be legally locked out of that helpful pacifying trick.

So how do we deal with uppity and aggressive women?

First, understand that women are not people, not human, and not really sentient.

They are just toys meant to keep you company and carry your reproductive device for you.

Kinda like some AI robot that cannot stop itself from talking nonsense.

Don’t ever attempt to engage them with logic. They have none.

You cannot win an argument with women using words.

With women, you have to argue using feelings.

Change what they feel. Don’t let them change what you feel.

Impose your will on the interaction.

Smile, grin, laugh, be playful, and force her to realize that she has no effect on you and no effect on the world.

She is small, she is tiny, she is insignificant.

These entertainment devices have no will of their own — but even if they had one, they have no way to impose it on the world.

One of the dumbest things I’ve read in my entire life is that “women are the gatekeepers of sex.”

Women literally cannot gatekeep shit.

In an environment that is true to nature, if a woman gatekeeps anything from you, then you’re not a man because men are naturally above women in might.

We can just take whatever we want from women.

The corrupt system we live in, on the other hand, creates the illusion of women being able to do stuff. It encourages men to view women as creatures that can gatekeep stuff from them. If something can be gatekept from you, it means that you need permission in order to obtain it, and that mindset inevitably results in a sick, destructive quest for the approval of women.

“But Pomidor, how do I smile and laugh when she’s coming at me with her mean words and actual violence?”

Understand the absurdity of this situation we live in.

Understand that basically, women are C-3PO.

And laugh at them.

Laugh at the absurd situation.

Laugh at the world.

Laugh at the universe.

Because you know the truth.

You know your real place.

You know this is just an illusion.

I try to keep things positive on this site (an obvious lie), but today I have something different: a message of bitterness and loathing in honor of a day singled out for a celebration of romantic love.

You see, brothers, I have come to realize a harsh but inescapable fact: it is not a viable option for a White man to secure a permanent relationship with a White woman within the current paradigm of society.  Due to effective engineering of the female species over a number of decades, there simply is no workable scenario wherein one can imagine finding a White woman and living happily ever after.

We will note that I am not saying that it doesn’t happen.  It does.  It is just that when it does, it is aught but a fluke – a series of unlikely circumstances, combined, leads to a situation which could not have been planned.  I don’t personally know anyone it’s happened to, but I know of it having happened (then again, maybe those cases just haven’t fallen apart yet – people are now getting divorces in their 40s and 50s).

Let me list the reasons the romantic dream is absolutely impossible to seek after and achieve.  Please note that this is mostly learned from observation, as I haven’t really had any relationships that lasted more than a few weeks in my entire life.  However, the observation has been keen.  This is something I think a lot about.

Firstly, most women are not interested in getting married until they are much past their prime, at which point they are not interesting.  Women below the age of 25, which is pretty well what all men below the age of 65 are looking for, have been completely brainwashed with silly nonsense about how they are going to start their own fashion design company and just have to work a few decades in an office before they can get down to business.  Plus, now they want to go on backpacking adventures across Asia and whatever else – a bunch of things they have been told they want to do but actually won’t ever do or won’t get any fulfilment when they do actually do.

Society has somehow convinced these women that this is what they want – to conquer some grand capitalist/artistic/spiritual endeavor – and convinced them that if they want something different – say, what women always wanted, which was a caring, strong husband and children – they are weak.

On top of this – and this is the kicker – society has failed to explain to these women that once they get to be 26 -29, this attention they are used to getting from men all day everyday will drop off, and their social capital will come down like the WTC.  In what is the height of institutionalized cruelty, women are told that men will care about their college degree and career, when in reality these things are, if anything, looked at as negatives by men.  On top of that, the plastic surgery-ridden and photoshopped models and celebrities plastered up everywhere make them believe that sexual attractiveness lasts past 30.

High schools should teach 16-year-old girls that they are at the peak of their sexual power over men, and everything from there is going to be down hill, until they are 30 and men won’t even bother to look at them, let alone follow them around like servant boys everywhere they go (granted here that certain genetics plus taking care of yourself can make this last longer for women, but not too much longer – I have seen smoking hot 32-year-old women, but they were tennis players and yoga fanatics who only shopped at Whole Foods and didn’t drink alcohol; still, even in those cases, fertility is wrapping itself up).  But high schools don’t teach that.  Instead they take women, who naturally want to get married and produce babies, and force them to become sick and malformed psychological wrecks.

At some point, the programming takes so well for the majority of females that they become completely useless for all but one thing.  And then they’re thirty and not really good for that one thing anymore, and wow – not good for anything else either.  They gave up the natural pleasantness and caring they were born with in order to pretend to become men and so when the looks go, there is nothing at all of any value left.  What, are you going to sit around and have an intellectual conversation with her?  Please, if you are a man, and you have had an interesting intellectual conversation with a woman, tell me about it in the comments – specifically, tell me the idea that she came at you with that you hadn’t thought of before.  Tying to have an intellectual conversation with a woman is like trying to play fetch with a cat.

The thing that we like about conversations with women is that we can tell them about things we can’t tell men, and they can grasp them in a way another man cannot.  If a woman gives up her femininity, in order to take on the identity of a man, she loses the natural positives of the female being – and don’t get me wrong here, there are very, very many of those positives, and they are invaluable – and is never able to take on the positives of a man.

So then, having figured all of this out, the obvious plan of any man trying to figure out a traditional relationship with a woman is to find a woman as young as possible (literally, depending on age of consent laws, as young as is legally possible – definitely under 20), drop the looks standards from the 8-9 range to the 6-7 range, and somehow get to her before the brainwashing fully sinks in, and brainwash her yourself.  Of course, for this to work, you have to have the money to trap her in a situation she can’t escape, and on top of that, you would have to get her pregnant immediately and stop her family from convincing her to have an abortion.

Oh, but then she’s got the kid, and she’s got her friends who are jealous of her situation and due to that jealousy try to take her away from it, like when these Gloria Steinem whores used to crash weddings and chant “here comes the slave, off to her grave.”  And then she meets some guy who’s like “bitch, get in my car, I’m gonna take you for a ride on my motorcycle – it’s got cocaine in the glove compartment and I’m a VIP at the greatest disco ever where bitches are taking their shirts off and getting sprayed with shaving foam 24/7.”

And given the laws in Western countries, she can leave you and take the baby and you have to work like a slave for 18 years to pay for it while her mother is raising it and she’s out at the disco getting hosed with shaving foam before the all-night cocaine party.  You have no recourse.  Literally, nothing.  They will put you in jail if you don’t pay, and you can in fact be extradited over it if you try to flee the country.  Unless you can somehow get citizenship in Morocco or North Korea, or if you want to permanently disappear and burn your passport in a third world village in Guatamala or something, your existence has just become doomed.  Because if no good deed goes unpunished, no attempt to lead a good life goes without having your life completely destroyed

Romantic Love as a Hoax, Common Mistakes of Youth

People are still obviously having these short-term (less than 5 year) relationships with the opposite sex, but they – pretty well universally – never go anywhere.

Women are largely driven by this conception of romantic love, which is really just sexual seduction but was turned by the Jews, through media, into a sacred and spiritual concept.  Romantic love says that you find “the one” and that when you find it, you are happy forever.  The sad fact is, the more you get to know a person, the less sexually attracted to them you are.  Anyone who has had a super-hot or even moderately-hot girlfriend is aware of this fact.  That is because “romantic love” i.e. sexual infatuation, is a natural mechanism for ensuring that men and women couple.  Following the coupling, it is meant that they develop another form of love, a deeper bonding, which is really not sexual in nature at all.  The same type of love you feel for family members.  Maybe you still buy her flowers every once and a while, but you do the same for your mother.

Men still are generally capable of understanding this, because men are prone toward seeking stability.  If you have a girlfriend for six months, and she doesn’t really get you all that worked up, you maybe only have sex once or twice a week and it is rather routine, you don’t mind, because you now feel comfortable with the woman.  You like her for different reasons than you originally did.  You like that she knows you, that you can tell her things you are feeling and she knows how to make you feel better.  You like that you have a routine, that you feel comfortable, and you are ready to have kids.  But you probably don’t have the money to have kids.  So then she gets bored.  Then some Black guy at the gas station is like “hey you bitch, whatcho know about my dick? I is botta puttin to you.”  And just like that, she’s gone.  And it doesn’t have to be a Black guy, that is an extreme case, it can also be some hipster dweeb who is well below you on the alpha scale and yet seduces her because she is bored of you and he made her feel like she is sexy again, which you don’t do because you don’t find her sexy anymore given that you’ve had sex with her hundreds of times.

Aggressive Black guy or whining hipster dweeb fawning over her, the situation ends the same: boom – locks are changed when you get home from work, arrangements are made for you to pick up your things, then your number is blocked in her phone.  Forever.

Women have a high capacity for psychopathic behavior.  She can literally make you feel as though she never knew you, that you are below nothing.  You can catch a woman you spent years with, who you loved with your entire being, you can fall on your knees and weep and beg for her to simply listen to what you have to say to her, and she can look at you like you are less than a dog and walk away.

Looking at evolutionary biology – which all human relational and in fact all behavior dynamics of all sorts are based on, whether you like it or not – a woman in a natural age would be highly likely to be kidnapped by some other tribe or army, and she would then have to shut off emotions for her previous lover basically immediately and adopt to the new man who held her in order to keep from being disregarded as not worth the hassle and killed.  That’s where this capacity to simply turn you off after a three year relationship comes from.  It’s not her fault.

Speaking of her faults – none of this is her fault.  Too many men become angry at women over all of this, and that is faggy beta-male whining, really following the feminist idea that women have some form of control over their own emotions and thus their own behavior.  Women react to environments and stimulation, period.  They don’t make decisions in the way that men make decisions, by processing information.  Their decision-making process is based entirely on emotion, and the emotion is stimulated exclusively by external forces, meaning they are not sovereign beings.  This was just a known fact all throughout history – something that you could have said either one of your grandfathers and they would be like “yeah, and?” Yet somehow in the modern world, even if it isn’t met with resistance, this information comes across as “whoa dude, you’re blowing my mind.”

Notes on Basic Beta-Male Faggotry

As I am rambling about relationships, I will mention what seems to be an ongoing problem for men, who don’t even get to the level we are talking about here: no gfism.

I generally assume that men who get into this sort of right-wing material have experience with women beyond what the average male has, but we all know the sort of modern man who literally has no experience at all with women, and has been sold the lie that they are some type of magical creatures just because they are nice to look at, and so believes that they have some type of logical thinking and if he is capable of showing them certain aspects of himself that he believes are deep or interesting, the woman will be interested in him because of it.  Counter-intuitive as it is, the less a woman knows about you as a person, the more attracted to you she is likely to be (this is in the initial phase of courting, after that she desires to take on everything you believe).

This whole “nice guy” approach fits into all of this that I am speaking on, in that it is a result of feminism; in order to believe you can woo a woman by making her think you are interesting, you accept the basic premise that a woman thinks like a man, which could not be any more false.

Then comes all of this “pick-up artist” material, which is a basic snake-oil Jew hoax.  Women being attracted to men who exhibit dominate traits is an obvious fact, but all this “game” nonsense is just goofball claptrap.  If you want to meet women, you just have to approach every one that you see that you like.  I am talking about on the street or shops or whatever, the clubs and bars are just a gigantic hoax – it is a scam for women to go out and get attention and confirmation that they are beautiful and desired, because for women being wanted for sex is what they crave, the actual sex is something they could almost do without completely.

When approaching girls in public places, in my experience, about 75% of them will reject you outright, but that still leaves a lot of hot women who are at least going to let you talk for a few minutes.  And my numbers are going to be significantly lower than most guys (who are equally thin, confident, clever, etc – none of which is particularly hard and which you should be anyway), given that I’m 5’7″, and height is the first thing all women recognize in the same way men first recognize hip-to-waist ratio.  If you have personal confidence, and take the position that you have so much to offer that if a woman doesn’t want her that is her own loss, then you won’t have any issues just approaching women on the street, because your self-confirmation comes from inside you, not in the reactions of women.

The thing is, it doesn’t really even matter.  Yeah, you are way more likely to get laid if you don’t act like a complete bitch living in fear of women, and I do understand that this is a biological need. But even for extreme alpha males, they aren’t really getting laid very often. Trust me, I have known some serious studs.  Any man who claims he is getting laid constantly with young hot girls is lying.  And the amount of emotional energy chasing women just for sex requires (assuming you are looking for women under 25 and you aren’t in school) is so high that you would have to have some sort of pathology to be willing to put that energy into it for such small amounts of physical pleasure.

Mostly, I view men who have an obsession with trying to rack-up numbers of sex partners as harboring serious personal insecurity, needing these “conquests” in order to confirm their own value (conversely, they could just have nothing at all going on in their lives, and view it as a hobby; but with all of the information available nowadays, all the learning you can engage in, you would have to be a boring person to be that bored).  And if you base your self-worth on what women think of you, you are a victim of feminism, period.

The inverse of that is true as well – if you have a fear of women, you have other psychological problems to do with masculinity you need to deal with.  Needing approval from women is always pathetic, and demonstrates deep-rooted psychological problems.

But let me clue you in on the bottom line, brothers:

If you are looking for a serious relationship with a woman, as most men presumably are once they reach a certain level of emotional and intellectual maturity, it makes no difference what your orientation is.  You are completely damned.

I don’t know what else to say.  These are simply the facts of the matter.

Thanks, Jews

Ultimately, like everything else which has ever gone wrong in history, this is the fault of the Jews.  It was all Jews which promoted this feminism, just like it was a Jew in the Garden of Eden who screwed everything up with that fruit scandal.

This is Where I should Insert Something Positive

I don’t really have anything positive to close with.  The situation really is this bad.  In order to fix this situation, we would have to completely change society on a fundamental level, rolling back the last 60 years of feminism.  You could do it, of course, and I don’t even think women would resist, as they are more unhappy than we are in this situation.  When you look at the eyes of the average  modern woman, she looks completely insane.  And we can at least go out with women and have fun until we’re too old to be interested.  For a woman, once she hits 35, if she is childless, she is doomed to 40 years of being completely and utterly alone.  We can do the loner thing, and not really suffer too much.

The one possible solution is Slavic women, but I’ve tried it and… well, it is not any sort of perfect solution, I’m not going to go into the details of why right now.  And in that case you would have to actually stay in her country, because if you brought her to the West she would do you the same as an Anglo woman.  The mean reason they still behave themselves is that they still have close family ties, and if she was away from the eyes of her family, it would only be a matter of time.

There are other tricks, perhaps.  A woman who already has one kid and the father is completely gone, or if you can find a woman who is thirty and doesn’t have the baggage that most 30-year-old women have, it could work.

And maybe I’m being too extreme here.  That is a definite possibility.  Maybe I am overly jaded.  Maybe I’ve overly generalized.  I can’t say for certain.  Again, what I have outlined is a series of generalized observations.  Personally, I don’t know one man – except Russians/Slavs – who have permanent healthy relationships with women.  But maybe my experience is a bad filter.

There is one bit of good news.  I think the White birthrate crisis is basically sensationalism, in that it is based on comparing our numbers to the numbers of the hordes.  If it was not for the hordes encroaching, we could really continue on as a race with 25% of our present population, and even though relationships aren’t working out, White people are still having kids. I know that is breaking from conventional wisdom in pro-White circles, but our problem is the number of the hordes, and more specifically, that they are invading our countries.  Due to automation, we don’t really need to be expanding.

So for me, that takes the pressure off.  We aren’t going to save the White race by having babies.  We are going to save the White race by fighting.  So the best advice I have for men is to put women out of their minds as much as is possible.  If you want to keep a girlfriend around, do it, but don’t make it something you can’t live without and don’t take it too seriously.  Unless you really have found a magic situation.  In which case I salute you, and invite you to write next year’s Valentine’s Day essay.