It used to be that you were able to be morally outraged about a lot of things.

For example:

• Homosexuality
• Race-mixing
• The Christ-killing Jew menace
• Women’s behavior in general
• Trannies

And on and on.

Now there is only one single thing that you are allowed to be outraged about: sex with small children.

And, of course, the media is in the process of removing your right to be outraged about that.

RT:

One of America’s largest newspapers has deleted a social media discussion of pedophilia after stirring outrage by claiming growing scientific consensus that sexual attraction to children is “determined in the womb.”

USA Today posted a Twitter message on Tuesday to promote an article on pedophiles, titled ‘What the public keeps getting wrong about pedophilia’. The newspaper said in a series of posts that pedophiles are likely born with a predisposition to be attracted to children and don’t have control over their sexual desires.

“A pedophile is an adult who is sexually attracted to children, but not all pedophiles abuse kids, and some people who sexually abuse kids are not pedophiles,” USA Today wrote. It added that evidence suggests pedophilia is “inborn,” and better access to therapy can help pedophiles control their impulses.

USA Today deleted this thread, in which the publication defended pedophilia. pic.twitter.com/ssfLjoDklt

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) January 11, 2022

The original tweet was quickly ratioed on Twitter, and USA Today later said it decided to pull down the entire thread because it allegedly lacked context that was provided by the article, which was behind a paywall. However, the newspaper later removed the paywall, allowing non-subscribers to access the article.

Multiple Twitter users took screenshots of the original messages, and the article failed to blunt their criticism of USA Today. The newspaper quoted Canadian sexologist Michael Seto as saying, “I think as a field, we’ve accepted the idea that this is not something that people choose.”

The article also argued that there’s growing scientific support for views like those of Old Dominion University professor Allyn Walker, who has called for “destigmatizing pedophilia” and referring to pedophiles as “minor-attracted persons.”

Here’s the original article in question. It was actually posted at the beginning of the week, and didn’t get much attention before it blew up on Twitter.

It’s all the same stuff we saw with the normalization of homosexuality – first it’s not their fault so they shouldn’t be persecuted, then it’s sex change surgeries for school children hidden from their parents.

And speaking of the sex change surgeries – as we’ve been saying from the beginning, by their own logic, sex with toddlers has already been rationally justified. You just have to look at the concept of “consent theory,” which is the reigning doctrine on all human sexuality. Right now, children can consent to becoming trannies – so why would they not be able to consent to sex with adults?

There’s no reason. Obviously, taking these hormone shots, let alone having these mutilating surgeries, is a lot worse than sexual abuse or rape. People recover from being sexually abused as children. By definition, you can’t recover from being permanently physically mutilated (and yes, the hormone treatments alone do permanently mutilate these kids bodies).

And of course, they’re not going to frame this as “rape,” in the way that it’s “rape” to have sex with an “underage” teenage girl who told you she was 18. They are going to frame the pedophile thing as children “voluntarily consenting” to relations with adults.

This normalization of adult-child sex relationships – particularly of the homosexual variety – will happen pretty fast. They’re already really spamming this stuff in the mainstream that was relegated to far left publications a couple years ago.

For some reason, journalists are feeling very skittish lately and seem to think that there are people out there that hate them enough to start attacking them.

I do NOT think that this is a justified fear.

Journo-killings aren’t a real problem in American society.

There have only been a couple of shooters who have targeted journalists in the US that I am aware of. The most famous recent shooting was in Annapolis, by a disgruntled non-White who believed that the journalists had defamed him.

And who could forget that one colored gentleman who shot up a reporter and her cameraman on live air?

Other than that, in the West generally, the only other high-profile targeting of journalists that comes to mind was done by the Moslems who targeted Charlie Hebdo.

So why are these American journos so skittish?

A guilty conscience maybe?

USA Today:

Heavily armed police officers evacuated USA TODAY’s headquarters in the Washington suburbs Wednesday after authorities said they received a report of a person with a weapon that ultimately proved to be unsubstantiated.

Fairfax County, Virginia, police reported that they had cleared the entire building without incident.

“This is a non-event,” said Fairfax County Police Chief Edwin Roessler Jr. “Everyone is safe, and I do not have any evidence that a crime was committed.”

Roessler said police had located a “person of interest” related to the case. The person was being questioned by police, but Roessler said the person was not linked to any crime.

Police received a call at 11:56 a.m., reporting that a man with gun was seen at the building, which holds the headquarters for USA TODAY, its parent company, Gannett Co., and offices for a variety of other businesses. The incident involved a company other than Gannett located in the building, Roessler said.

So basically, someone thought that they saw a gun and that set off a panic.

This brought a whole police army out in full battle-rattle. We’re talking all five stars in GTA tier here.

Alarms sounded inside the building early Wednesday afternoon as police squad cars, firetrucks and ambulances converged on the scene. Law enforcement officers with rifles and body armor searched stairwells and a helicopter hovered overhead as they escorted hundreds of employees out of the building.

Fairfax County police tweeted around noon that they were responding to reports of a man with a weapon at the building.

The overwhelming police response comes after the attack last year at the Capital Gazette newspaper in Annapolis, Maryland. A gunman burst into the newsroom there and killed five employees of the paper. News organizations, including USA TODAY, tightened security after that shooting.

Roessler said authorities “treated this event as though we had an active shooter.” 

This must have been very expensive for the police department. Extrapolating further, if lefties are skittish and start calling the police over false alarms, this will cost departments millions of dollars and either lead to them going bankrupt or no longer being able to respond every single time an alarm is raised.

I’m surprised that anarchists haven’t started employing this as a tactic, to be quite honest.

A climate of panic and terror could exhaust the resources of the police. This was actually a tactic used by the Moslems in Russia during the Chechen wars and, arguably, still now. People calling in false bomb threats and giving out false tips was a staple of the conflict in Northern Ireland as well.

So we have to tread carefully here, folks.