If you hire a bunch of goofy sluts to run your police, you really can’t be too surprised when the obvious happens.

What do people think?

You’re going to put a bunch of women on the police force, and expect that they won’t have sex with Arabian gang members? How does that make any sense, on any level?

Who would think that? 

European Conservative:

Some 30 police officers in Sweden provoked public outrage in yet another major scandal involving gang activity. It appears that law enforcement officials allowed themselves to be seduced and exploited by gangsters to whom they gave information that later led to several deadly altercations on the streets.

The shocking details were first revealed in an extensive investigation published by the local daily Dagens Nyheter (DN), which found over 500 instances of Swedish police personnel leaking classified information. Gang members were briefed regarding ongoing investigations, upcoming raids, or competing gangs.

Yeah.

Women protect men they are sexually fixated on.

The men that women are most likely to be sexually fixated on are criminals.

DN’s report also found evidence that leaks concerning information on rival criminals assisted in several attacks on enemy gang members, including at least four murders.

The report—based on conversations with some 50 sources in the law enforcement community and the criminal underworld, backed by hundreds of public documents—also revealed that, in many cases, the gang members used quite unconventional methods to obtain the information, such as starting “sexual relationships with strategically selected [female] police officers.”

One example is “Elin,” who met her gangster boyfriend through a dating app when she was still a cadet. Regularly, she chose to feed him classified information she obtained through illegal searches over the course of four years until she was caught.

There are many similar cases to Elin’s, with some initiated by officers even much more experienced than her. One officer leaked info to “one of Sweden’s most notorious criminals,” apparently because of his notoriety, while separately a police investigator who fell in love with the very man she was tasked to investigate provided him with regular updates on her “progress.”

As a result of the revelations over the weekend, at least 30 police officers were sacked or forced to resign for being labeled “security risks.” Since 2018, these officers were behind at least 514 known leaks.

Sweden’s national police chief, Petra Lundh, has called the officers’ behavior “completely unacceptable,” saying that both the police and the judiciary had been “naive” to not anticipate these types of elaborate infiltration methods.

How much is the liberal project worth?

If you had a 100% female police force, 100% of cops would be having sex with Arab gangsters and feeding them information while protecting them.

This isn’t complicated.

It’s very obvious to anyone who knows anything at all about women.

There is zero room for confusion here if you understand just the single first thing about the nature of reality.

If you want to run a system that is based on a false reality inside of actual reality, that system is going to fail, miserably.

If you didn’t have mass immigration, you wouldn’t have gangs, and then the worst that could happen is that the female cops could have sex with some white guy who sells LSD and help him get out of a parking ticket.

Female cops would still be useless in a country without immigration, but it wouldn’t really matter, because there wouldn’t really be any crime.

A system this disconnected from reality cannot exist indefinitely.

Don’t worry, it’s not immigration

Anal is non-negotiable.

Democracy is all about people choosing things by voting, but if you vote against anal, you’re against democracy, because democracy is actually primarily about anal, not voting.

It’s confusing to many, because it is about voting and the people deciding, but only if the people decide on mass anal and support for Israel and the Ukraine.

Reuters:

Sweden’s parliament on Wednesday passed a law that will make it easier for people to change their legal gender and lower the age at which it is allowed to 16 years from 18 years, despite heavy criticism from within the government coalition.

Swedes have been able to change legal gender since 1972, but it can take many years and requires a thorough investigation and a doctor’s diagnosis of gender dysphoria.

Under the new law, which will come into force next year, a shorter consultation with a doctor or a psychologist will suffice, along with approval from The National Board of Health and Welfare.

The new law will also decouple the process of legal gender change from medical procedures like sex reassignment surgery, which will still require a lengthier evaluation.

Backers of the bill say it’s a modernisation of the existing law that will put Sweden closer to Nordic neighbours and many other European countries, which already have systems for people to determine their legal gender.

“This is not a revolution we are doing today, it is a reform,” said Johan Hultberg of the Moderates during a debate. “It is not reasonable that there should be the same requirements for changing legal gender as for making an irreversible gender confirming surgery.”

However, the bill is unpopular, especially with voters to the right.

According to a recent poll commissioned by TV4, 59% of Swedes say it is a bad or very bad proposal, while 22% think it is a good one.

Well, 22% support is a lot more than most of the policies of the US government have.

So is Sweden is the superior democracy?

No, actually. The US teaches 3-year-olds to become trannies. The US is the superior democracy.

Sweden is lost

You can’t just go around saying Moslems shouldn’t kill Swedes.

It’s against the rules-based order.

Talk abut the Jews all you want, but Swedes deserve to die. Because of the Holocaust.

The Local:

A tweet by Sweden Democrat MP Jessica Stegrud’s following the terror attack in Brussels which killed two Swedes has been harshly criticised by Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson and the leader of the Social Democrats, Magdalena Andersson.

The Euro 2024 qualifier between Belgium and Sweden, which took place in Brussels, was called off at half time on Monday night after two Swedish football fans were murdered and another injured in a terror attack a few kilometres away.

Fredrik Reinfeldt, former Moderate prime minister and current chairman of the Swedish Football Association, attended the game.

After the attack, Stegrud wrote a now-deleted post on X, formerly known as Twitter, which received harsh criticism.

“Reinfeldt was given a police escort out of the arena – after two (probably) Swedish football fans were killed by an islamist. He, if anyone, should have been forced to stay there with no police protection at all. My thoughts go to the dead and their families. My contempt goes to all the politicians – including FR [Fredrik Reinfeldt] – who laid the foundations for this.”

Stegrud, who was a Sweden Democrat MEP before entering the Swedish parliament last year, joined the party’s leader Jimmie Åkesson on the campaign trail prior to the 2022 election and has been widely touted as his possible successor. She was listed as Sweden’s fourth most influential politician on social media by Medieakademin’s 2022 power barometer.

Her criticism of Reinfeldt and her accusation that he “laid the foundations for this”, is most likely a reference to a now-famous summer speech, often referred to as the öppna era hjärtan (open your hearts) speech.

This guy is the main reason why Sweden imported more rapefugees per capita than any other country in Europe, even Germany

Reinfeldt in August 2014 called for Swedes to “show patience and open their hearts” to refugees seeking safety in the country. In the 2014 election which took place one month after the speech, around eight percent of former Moderate voters switched to the Sweden Democrats, who climbed from 4.8 percent in 2010 to 12.9 percent in 2014, becoming Sweden’s third-largest party.

At a press conference on Tuesday about the Brussels attack, Ulf Kristersson commented on Stegrud’s tweet.

“A lack of judgement,” he said. ” This is not the time for carelessness, recklessness or comments of that nature. This is not the time for making any of this party politics at all.”

…

Social Democrat leader and former prime minister Magdalena Andersson criticised Kristersson for not acting on the post, pointing out that Kristersson was a minister in the Reinfeldt government which Stegrud expressed contempt for.

…

Andersson said that she was “shocked” when she saw the tweet.

The Sweden Democrats’ group leader in parliament, Linda Lindberg, said in written comment to TT that, as far as her party is concerned, the tweet requires no discussion.

“The security situation is worse than it has been for a long time. Shootings are taking place on Swedish streets. Innocent Swedish football fans are being murdered by Islamists. Given the situation, some people are choosing to get fired up over an MP who expressed her frustration over the situation on social media. I think that’s ridiculous.”

Stegrud has deleted the original tweet and reposted a more toned-down version, which still criticises Reinfeldt for “getting more protection than others” and accuses him for “laying the political groundwork for this accelerating insecurity”.

Why did they bring all of these Moslems into their country and then… support Israel? And burning Korans?

It’s an insane behavior.

If you want to become an Islamic state, okay, well – I guess that’s your choice.

But you can’t become an Islamic state that is pro-Israel and pro-Koran burning.

That is just going to get everyone murdered.

We must say, once more: you can do freedom of speech or not.

There is no freedom of speech in Denmark. You can’t burn the Talmud in front of the synagogue. You can’t even say “nigger.”

So, when you have these restrictions on free speech, but then you’re allowed to burn Korans, it is very obvious that you are specifically targeting Moslems.

No one has explained the purpose of this. No they’re saying they’re going to stop it, without bothering to explain why it was happening in the first place.

They are just saying “free speech” – go burn the Talmud in front of the synagogue in Copenhagen. See if you have free speech. You’ll be sent to prison.

AP:

Denmark’s foreign minister said Sunday the government will seek to make it illegal to desecrate the Quran or other religious holy books in front of foreign embassies in the Nordic country.

Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen said in an interview with the Danish public broadcaster DR that the burning of holy scriptures “only serves the purpose of creating division in a world that actually needs unity.”

Yeah – missing the point.

You don’t have to unify with Moslems in order to not have a system that is apparently designed to insult and attack them, specifically.

“That is why we have decided in the government that we will look at how, in very special situations, we can put an end to mockery of other countries, which is in direct conflict with Danish interests and the safety of the Danes,” he said.

It’s definitely against your safety.

If you were burning Talmuds, the Jews wouldn’t do mass shootings against you. They would do a lot of other things – a lot of other things – but they wouldn’t shoot you or run you over with a big truck.

The Moslems will definitely do that.

A recent string of public Quran desecrations by a handful of anti-Islam activists in Denmark and neighboring Sweden have sparked angry demonstrations in Muslim countries.

Løkke Rasmussen said the Cabinet of Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen is determined to find “a legal tool” to prohibit such acts without compromising freedom of expression, but he acknowledged that would not be easy.

“There must be room for religious criticism, and we have no thoughts of reintroducing a blasphemy clause,” he told DR. “But when you stand up in front of a foreign embassy and burn a Quran or burn the Torah scroll in front of the Israeli embassy, it serves no other purpose than to mock.”

No one is burning the Torah scroll in front of the Israeli embassy – and that would serve a lot of different purposes beyond mockery.

His comments followed a statement issued late Sunday by the Danish government saying freedom of expression is one of the most important values in Danish society.

Denmark has had “hate speech” laws since 1939

But, it added, the descreation of the Muslim holy book in Denmark has resulted in the nation being viewed in many places around the world “as a country that facilitates insult and denigration of the cultures, religions, and traditions of other countries.”

Actually, you’re viewed as a bunch of kike-lovers who have a state policy of insulting Islam while banning every other form of free speech.

The Moslems would be angry about Koran burnings regardless. However, if they knew there was real free speech, and people could do the same to the Jews, they would be a lot less angry.

The reason the Moslems are angry is that these policies are very obviously specifically targeted at Moslems.

The Scandinavians – and northern Europeans generally – defined “free speech” as “you can now do blasphemy.” It was about attacking Christians, originally. Then that faggot bitch whiner Theo van Gogh started attacking Islam and some people did some things to him.

Jews were always exempt. You were never allowed to attack Jews. Jews, when it suits them, claim to be a race. In reality, Christians and Moslems could make the same claim, based on the fact that the core populations of each religion is a certain race (which is the same with Judaism – Mizrahi and Sephardi are racially different than Ashkenazim).

Snake Baker contributed to this article.

]]>