Honestly, I’m a bit shocked you can even buy pigs blood in the UK.

It’s an Islamic country – why is pig’s blood available by the gallon?

White people need to do something about this.

RT:

Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned, an English lord learned firsthand, when his lover trashed his south London flat with liters of pig blood, spraying lewd insults on the walls of their former love nest.

Lizzie Purbrick, 63, took nefarious revenge on former Tory MP Lord David Prior of Brampton, also 63, after she caught him canoodling with another woman, the wife of another member of the House of Lords.

Purbrick, a former equestrian and a member of the British team at the 1980 Moscow Olympics, procured some eight liters of pig blood from a butcher and slipped into Prior’s flat, to which she had a key. The woman then enacted her retribution by filling the garden sprayer with blood and defacing the walls with the words “whore,””big d*ck lord,””lady slut” and other insults. She topped it all off by tarnishing the floor with the image of a penis, also in blood.

Wew.

Writing on the walls in pig’s blood is serious effing business.

But isn’t complimenting him on his dick size counterintuitive in this context? 

(Note: It isn’t, actually. This is the way women’s minds work. They are obsessed with men’s dicks, and the anger here is at being denied access to his, so complimenting it in pigs blood – an attack that was aimed at the other woman, not him directly – makes very much sense.)

Purbrick used the leftover blood to smear whatever else in the apartment she could get her hands on. She was so generous with the red stuff that it ended up oozing out under the door, which eventually prompted a neighbour to sound the alarm. Purbick apparently remained oblivious, taken up by her sweet revenge with loud music reportedly playing in the background, the court heard.

I wish I knew what song she was listening to.

It’s a travesty they didn’t report it.

Given her age and the emotions here, I’ll bet you a bitcoin it was this:

If it were me, it would have been this:

But seriously though, please tell the song, media.

Having let off some steam, the former Olympian apparently felt remorseful, leaving a check for £1,000 and surrendering to the police immediately after the incident. During the trial, the woman’s lawyer described her rampage as “cathartic” and a one-off event caused by a broken heart.

Purbrick was charged with criminal damage to the property and was sentenced to 120 hours of community service. She was also given a restraining order, banning her from entering any of the Lord’s three homes.

lol

Imagine if a man did this to a woman.

He’d get life in prison.

As has been said a trillion times on this website: women now have all the freedoms of men – significantly more, in fact – but they have none of the responsibilities and thus suffer none of the consequences.

They are pretty much just allowed to do whatever the hell they want.

So the US did away with Congressional approval for wars about three middle-eastern shitholes ago. That’s already an accepted reality. But I thought that the UK parliament still had some sway and that Europe was a civilized, rule-abiding place.

So did Theresa May just go ahead and authorize these strikes just like that?

Sputnik:

UK Prime Minister Theresa May says she have authorized the British armed forces to conduct coordinated and targeted strikes to “degrade the Syrian regime’s chemical weapons capability and deter their use.” Her statement was followed by a similar message from French President Emmanuel Macron.

After a little bit of clicking around, I have looked up the relevant facts. It turns out that the UK can only legally declare war by “Royal Prerogative.”

It’s exactly what it sounds like

And the Queen dismissed a bill that would have made it part of the protocol to put wars to a vote in Parliament first in 1999.

So I guess, yeah, the UK can just go to war at the drop of a hat.

And what about Macron?

French National Assembly Official Site:

Article 35.

A declaration of war shall be authorized by Parliament.

The Government shall inform Parliament of its decision to have the armed forces intervene abroad, at the latest three days after the beginning of said intervention. It shall detail the objectives of the said intervention. This information may give rise to a debate, which shall not be followed by a vote.

Where the said intervention shall exceed four months, the Government shall submit the extension to Parliament for authorization. It may ask the National Assembly to make the final decision.

If Parliament is not sitting at the end of the four-month period, it shall express its decision at the opening of the following session.

Okay, well shit, I guess Macron can just up and intervene whenever he wants as well.

That’s bullshit. 

Big decisions like wars should be put to a vote – a plebiscite at the very least. These are serious decisions that affect every citizen – especially in the age of modern warfare because every citizen gets held to account for what their government does.

No one wants this war.

No one in France, no one in the UK and no one in the US. Only the people in Tel Aviv want this.

If we had a vote, we would have no war. It’s as simple as that. What kind of democracies do we have when we can’t even vote on the most important issue of all.

Here is the list of UK MEPs that are considered “reliable allies” by George Soros including one who is an IRA terrorist and another who was “assistant secretary-general of the Muslim Council of Britain” and whose interests are listed as “combating the far right”. These images are taken from this document which contains a full list of “reliable allies” broken down by different countries, issues and structures (link).

New MPs are to be given lessons in ethics to reverse the ‘jaundiced’ public view of politicians.

The Commons standards watchdog has proposed the lessons in the wake of the expenses and lobbying controversies.

Courses will start after the next general election, in 2015, and aim to bolster MPs’ confidence in how to act in public office.

Lord Bew, the chairman of the committee on standards in public life, said the seminars would raise ‘the awareness of practical ethical issues among MPs’.

Lessons on how to accept gifts and contact with outside lobbyists would raise the ‘ethical sensitivity of members of parliament’, according to Lord Bew.

‘People are thrust into situations they don’t expect and they are not necessarily equipped to know how to behave,’ he said.

‘There are sometimes simple cases of corruption, but a lot of what is going on now is a little bit more complicated to work out what is right and what is wrong.’

Read More