In 2018, we all joked about the presidential candidate Andrew Yang’s plan to give everyone $1000 a month and how that kind of voter bribery was better than anything other politicians were offering. However, since then, I’ve seen shill “right-wingers” on social media, in particular neo-Nazis, argue unironically in favor of a UBI system.

It shouldn’t take long to grasp why UBI is a poisonous concept. Firstly, you’re not a child, you’re a grown man, and begging the government for allowance money is humiliating and shameful. You will never be able to maintain any kind of dignity in this situation.

In much more practical terms, however, the government providing you with an allowance would mean that the government is your daddy and the government makes the rules. When you’re a child and your father gives you an allowance, he can withhold your allowance if you’ve been a bad boy. In the context of the government giving you money, they will be able to withhold it if you haven’t gotten your vaxx, or if you’ve said something naughty on the internet.

AP:

By triggering $1,400 stimulus checks for millions of people and expanding the child tax credit for many families, the pandemic offered a clear takeaway for some officials: That putting tax dollars in people’s pockets is achievable and can be a lifeline to those struggling to get by.

Now a growing number of mayors and other leaders say they want to determine for sure whether programs like these are the best way to reduce poverty, lessen inequality and get people working.

In experiments across the country, dozens of cities and counties — some using money from the $1.9 trillion COVID relief package approved in March — and the state of California are giving some low-income residents a guaranteed income of $500 to $1,000 each month to do with as they please, and tracking what happens. A coalition known as Mayors for a Guaranteed Income plans to use the data — collected alongside a University of Pennsylvania-based research center — to lobby the White House and Congress for a federal guaranteed income or, for starters, to make the new $300 per month child tax credit that’s set to expire after this year permanent.

The surge in interest in these so-called free money pilot programs shows how quickly the concept of just handing out cash, no strings attached, has shifted from far-fetched idea to serious policy proposal, even as critics blast the programs as unaffordable or discouraging people from going to work. Supporters say it’s all due to COVID-19, which cost millions of people their jobs and prompted the federal government under both Presidents Donald Trump and Joe Biden to cut checks to rescue the economy — relief that was hugely popular politically.

“The pandemic showed us what is possible,” said Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, whose latest budget included a $24 million guaranteed income program to give 2,000 poor families $1,000 per month. “We’re now going to be a pretty potent lobby to get the child tax credit permanent.”

…

Mayors for a Guaranteed Income started with 11 founding mayors and now has more than 50.

The goal of the coronavirus hoax was to destroy independent livelihoods and make it so you cannot provide for yourself, thereby making you dependent on the government.

Obviously, if that’s already happened to you, and you are getting money from the government, I don’t advise you to refuse it presently in order to prove a point. Take what you can get from this system that has taken so much from you. I’m also fully aware that it is infuriating that the Republicans supported all of these shutdowns in the name of this stupid fake virus and are now going out there and telling people that it’s not the government’s responsibility to help people destroyed by lockdown measures implemented by the government.

More broadly, the entire current order, even before the coronavirus hoax, was designed to keep people struggling to get by. It is simply unfathomable that at our current level of technology, people struggling more to maintain a normal life then they did in the 1950s. The manipulation of the value of the currency, along with the favoring of mega corporations like Walmart and then Amazon over small businesses and a mass third world immigration program – the government has crippled the population.

But understand that this is all part of the plan, and understand that this UBI system is intended to be conditional. The people who created this situation do no want to fix it.

Polling shows that the majority of Americans are in support of a guaranteed income. Mayors are being responsive to their constituents and the moment in piloting and advocating. @mayorsforagi https://t.co/EXxNzmaPYO

— Michael Tubbs (@MichaelDTubbs) July 23, 2021

They are setting up a psychotronic control grid with vaxx pass and tracking grid. This system is going to be linked not just to your vaxx history and larger medical, but to your entire personal profile. Eventually, the same smartphone app system that tracks and traces your every movement and tells you when to come in for your latest booster shot is also going to dole out your allowance money, which will be issued in the form of digital credits.

Obviously, all of this is eventually going to be linked to a computer chip implanted in your hand. That will allow you to “move freely” if you’re vaxxed up, and allow you to pay for your bug gruel and gay discos by swiping your hand.

Bill Gates has patented a microchip – patent number 060606 – which allows people to earn credits for accomplishing tasks. This will turn reality into a kind of video game system, where your behavior is being monitored by the system and they encourage certain behaviors by automatically sending you credits.

None of this is something that is being thought of on the fly. There was a planned agenda long before you ever heard the word “coronavirus,” and that agenda is being implemented. Making people dependent on government handouts in order to survive was a big part of this plan.

They aren’t doing this in response to China.

This is part of a much longer, larger plan.

RT:

Top US officials are reportedly calling for a hard look at China’s plans for a digital yuan, after raising concerns that the new currency may potentially challenge the greenback as the world’s dominant reserve currency.

Officials at the Treasury, State Department, Pentagon, and National Security Council are currently trying to explore the potential implications of China’s new sovereign digital currency, people familiar with the matter told Bloomberg.

The presidential administration is reportedly not concerned about the immediate challenge the e-yuan might pose to regulatory frameworks and monetary systems.

However, American officials are worried that the new Chinese currency may be used to bypass US sanctions. Moreover, the government officials would like to know how the digital yuan will be distributed.

Last year, the People’s Bank of China revealed plans to have its sovereign digital currency ready in time for the 2022 Winter Olympics. China became the first country in the world to test such a product on a national level.

According to the Chinese central bank, the new currency will share some features with cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin. The digital yuan is projected to replace banknotes and coins.

The White House is said not to be planning any measures against the e-yuan, but is highly interested in creating a digital dollar.

Of course, it will take these people forever to actually do this – but they are really planning it.

Hopefully, it will come just in time for the collapse of the dollar, which these Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) people running the Biden Administration are going to cause as soon as people realize that these stocks are not actually worth trillions.

Here’s an infographic (you can figure out the problems with this yourself if you’ve got an average IQ or higher):

Right now, all of this extra money is being dumped into the stock market, and is just being parked there, but at some point, it’s just going to get too ridiculous, and people are going to start pulling their cash out, and then there will be hyperinflation. We already have the money to create hyperinflation, it’s just that it’s all parked in the stock market.

Biden is supposedly pushing some aggressive tax plan to try to balance this, but that is absurd. No one even knows how much money they’ve printed since this coronavirus thing started, but it’s enough to create a death spiral, as problems start popping up and their only solution is to print their way out of it.

At some point, a new digital currency will be introduced, and it will be linked to an app on your phone, and you’ll get some number of digital credits per month as a “UBI.” Probably, getting it will be tied to having been vaxxed, not being a racist, and so on. Though they might not attach those strings when it first rolls out – who knows.

What we do know is this: this is not a very long timeline. People will say things like “5 or 10 years out,” and I don’t think that is realistic. I think this is all happening now.

I think a UBI plan is in the cards, but they want you to suffer for a while first.

They’re just going to do some bullshit with the minimum wage that doesn’t help anyone, and maybe send you one check or two.

This isn’t actual communism.

Fox News:

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., said Sunday that Democrats will move pass a COVID-19 relief package through reconciliation, a special process that allows for a 51-majority vote, rather than the 60 votes normally required to advance legislation, if Republicans do not quickly express support for the $1.9 trillion bill.

Sanders, the incoming chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, said in an appearance on CNN’s “State of the Union” that unlike Republicans who used reconciliation to pass a tax cut bill and attempt to repeal Obamacare, Democrats will use 50 votes in the Senate, plus Vice President Kamala Harris’ tie-breaking vote, to “pass legislation desperately needed by working families in this country right now.”

“If Republicans are willing to work with us to address that crisis, welcome – let’s do it. But what we cannot do is wait weeks and weeks and months to go forward. We’ve got to act now. That’s what the American people want,” Sanders told CNN anchor Dana Bash.

“These are major policy changes, and I criticized Republicans for using reconciliation to give tax breaks to billions to create a situation where large profitable corporations now pay zero in federal income taxes. Yes, I did criticize them for that,” Sanders said. “And if they want to criticize me for helping to feed children who are hungry – or senior citizens who are isolated and alone and don’t have enough food, they can criticize me. I think it’s the appropriate step forward.”

They’re gonna keep saying Republicans are stopping them, even though the math is impossible, given that they control both Houses.

Democrats don’t want to make you financially stable any more than Republicans want to stop immigration. Bernie Sanders is the leftist Trump, or he was before he cucked (like Trump cucked on a lot of stuff, I guess), but the average Democrat and the average Republican have the same policies, and they just blame their failure to get any of the policies they want done on the other party.

This happened after the 2016 election, when Republicans controlled everything, and it will happen now.

Just wait and watch it happen.

It truly is a “uniparty.”

The only time they have disagreements is when Chuck refuse to sit directly next to “filthy goyim animals” – but that includes both Mitch and Nancy.

In a democracy, the only people who actually get what they want are the Jews. Then, as second, homosexuals (because they, like Jews, are a cult that has real power in the government and private sector). Then, as a far distant third, maybe some nonwhites.

They will give homosexuals a total removal of the age of consent before you get a single thing you’re asking for, whether you’re Republican or Democrat.

But yeah, eventually, you’ll get an apartment the size of a parking space in a high rise tenement and some number of digital credits to spend (registered to the computer chip in your right hand) on fake meat made of insects and drugs.

We’ve got two separate issues with the lockdown:

1. The lockdown was insane and retarded, no element of it made any sense whatsoever
2. The government forced this lockdown on us, and the government is responsible for this collapse, therefore they have a duty to help the people whose lives they’ve destroyed

Many libertarians and conservatives are pointing out the first thing, but then not addressing the second thing.

Most infuriating was when Ted Cruz – who never stood up against the lockdown – mocked people for not being able to buy food after the government took their jobs.

Why stop there? Why only $2k/month? And why exclude non-citizens or non-Americans? Why not send $100k/month, every month, to every person on earth? And also prohibit any of them from working. In the magical world of free-money socialists, why, exactly, wouldn’t that work? 🤔 https://t.co/UM8Uc1LaTN

— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) May 8, 2020

There is no room for this sentiment. What has happened has happened. We can talk about the stupidity of it until the cows come home, but we’re still going to be in a situation where no one has a job because the government purposefully and inexplicably destroyed the American economy with their lunatic hoax.

The Hill recently ran an article by Chris Talgo of the Heartland Research Institute claiming that the government destroyed the economy, but still, people shouldn’t get money from the government:

The U.S. economy is sinking, and some on the far left have a preposterous plan to prevent Americans from drowning in more unpaid bills and debt: Stay home and don’t worry about anything. The government will send you a check for $2,000 every month.

If only it were that easy.

Since the onslaught of shutdowns to flatten the curve and prevent the nation’s health care system from being overwhelmed, more than 30 million Americans have lost their jobs. The unemployment rate has skyrocketed to 14.7 percent. Families throughout the United States are struggling to buy food and pay their bills because the government will not let them return to work.

To date, Congress has allocated more than $2.4 trillion in coronavirus-related economic aid. From the CARES Act to the Paycheck Protection Program, Congress has tried to keep businesses afloat and employees on payrolls. Obviously, as the most recent unemployment report shows, this stopgap strategy is not working. 

Perhaps we should pause and reassess the necessity of the draconian shutdown strategy. After all, we have flattened the curve, and at this point it does not seem that health care facilities are in danger of being overrun. Wouldn’t it make a lot of sense to focus on how to safely reopen the economy so Americans can return to work and retain their self-reliance?

Yet, according to prominent Democrats in Congress, instead of smartly reopening the economy, we should double-down on Keynesian economics and just print more money than ever. In other words, Americans ought to stay home and get “paid” by the U.S. government.

According to Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), “The government has told people we need to shelter in place to keep safe. So it’s the government’s obligation to provide for basic expenses while we’re telling people not to work. It’s really that simple.” Khanna is just one of many congressional Democrats who are calling for the federal government to send Americans monthly payments for who knows how long.

I am 100% against the shutdown, and I don’t know the context of that Khanna quote – but that one statement alone is completely impossible to argue with.

The government did do this. They destroyed the jobs of millions of people, they collapsed every small business. They did this by force. The shutdown was not a suggestion. It was forced on the people. So the fallout absolutely is their responsibility. They should have to pay people.

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) recently tweeted, “Bills come in every single month during the pandemic and so should help from our government.” Harris has endorsed a plan called the Monthly Economic Crisis Support Act, which would send $2,000 per month to Americans who make less than $120,000 per year. Married couples would receive $4,000 per month, as well as $2,000 for each child.

Oh, and the checks would be sent for up to three months after the coronavirus crisis ends. This raises an interesting point: When and how will we know the “crisis” has ended, and the payments will be stopped? This alone should raise one’s eyebrows.

The crisis isn’t ever going to end.

There never was a coronavirus crisis – that was just a stupid hoax invented by the media and the government. The problems of the coronavirus could have been solved by telling old people and otherwise vulnerable people to stay inside and have food delivered to them. We could have locked down the nursing homes and kept the staff inside the quarantine zone for several months. There were all kinds of options to protect the vulnerable.

Instead of doing any of these things, the government decided to shut down the entire society and implode the economy.

So I mean – figure it out. I don’t know. But either the government is going to feed people, or they’re going to starve. There isn’t a third option.

American history is full of examples of government programs that were intended to be temporary yet continue to this day. In fact, several provisional measures and programs enacted during the Great Depression are still in place today.

A cynic might say that some Democrats are using the coronavirus crisis as an opportunity to push their progressive agenda. For years, many on the far left have advocated for monthly government programs in the form of a universal basic income (UBI).

…

Keep in mind, all of this fervor over the UBI in far-left circles predated the COVID-19 pandemic by a few years, at least. So, given the historical context, is it such a logical leap to assume that some on the left are using the coronavirus crisis as an opportunity to introduce another “temporary” welfare program that is almost assuredly going to be popular among Americans who receive it?

Benjamin Franklin reportedly said, “When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.” Could a UBI in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic inadvertently lead to this nightmare scenario?

Look, bro, let me help you out with something: there is no path forward that doesn’t lead to a nightmare scenario.

We basically are faced with a binary choice here:

1. Let tens of millions of people starve as a result of the actions of this government, or
2. Start giving people free money until hyper inflation starts, at which point we’ll start putting larger numbers on our notes until the whole thing just collapses in on itself

You can try to figure out something in between those two options. But you’re going to have a hard time. The only thing is really to give people less money so that inflation happens slower.

Crazy third options potentially exist. Technically.

For instance, you could take everyone whose life was destroyed by this planned economic collapse and move them into gigantic government housing complexes, where they are provided directly with food by the government. This is a “Mega-City One” type option.

These complexes would be an absolute hell, riddled with drugs and crime, and there would be no real way to police them. It would be a kind of prison situation, where you just put people in and told them to fend for themselves.

In the longer term, you could try to reestablish a manufacturing base in the country, and rebuild the economy that way. But you would need actual, serious leadership that simply does not exist in our government, which is literally the single most corrupt government in all of human history.

There is going to be a lot of bullshit partisan back and forth on this issue, with Republicans saying that it was wrong for the government to do this but also that the government can’t be held responsible for its actions and people are just going to have to starve. On the other side, Democrats will say that the government was right to do this, but that they must provide the people with money to buy food.

Everyone will have a comment on this, and all of them will be benign.

Ultimately, this is the intelligent take, which anyone who is honest and has an IQ over 90 is going to come to eventually:

The government did this on purpose. That means that they have some kind of plan to follow up this first act. They are going to do whatever they were planning to do, and we are going to see the purpose of this hoax unfold. 

Of course, most people are too scared to admit that this was all done on purpose, given all that this implies. So most who recognize the insanity will claim that it was the result of incompetence.

Obviously, the incompetence theory can be easily dismissed by pointing out that this system is run by money, and no businesses other than Walmart and the vaccine industry would support this total collapse. So, the entire elite had to have been on board with this.

A record number of 219 CEOs stepped down in January. CEOs of Mastercard, Linkedin, T-Mobile, IBM, Harley-Davidson, Credit Suisse, Salesforce, UPS, Match Group (owns okcupid, Tinder etc), Disney all left shortly before this crisis started exploding. They all fucking knew.

— Learned Dr. Kantbot, PhD (@KANTBOT20K) March 21, 2020

I don’t have any reason to believe the plan will work, but there is definitely a plan. All you have to do is look at statements from top technocrats to figure out what comes next. The plan involves remaining in a permanent state of fear of viruses, with various degrees of lockdown going on forever, while also implementing some form of digital currency with UBI. All independent businesses are going to be gone, so you will be able to use your UBI card – which will eventually be replaced with a computer chip in your right hand – at Walmart and other big-box stores.

There might also be a war with China, and definitely some major war in the Middle East.

None of us have any control over what happens next. The best thing we can do is try to organize the people, to use these protests to build a new political bloc in opposition to this brutal government.

A hooker is a small business and the gooks are bailing them out during this time of economic crisis.

This is a lot more logical than bailing out banks the way America is doing. America is bailing out multinational corporations – that is, corporations which are not even exclusively operating in the country!

New York Post:

Japan is trying to give sex workers a leg up during the coronavirus pandemic.

The nation is offering financial aid to members of the oldest profession whose job prospects have gone limp amid social distancing — but regulations make it difficult for those in the stigmatized industry to apply without outing themselves, according to a new report.

The country’s central government launched a massive stimulus package worth about 108 trillion Japanese yen — nearly $1 trillion — to bolster the country during the impending economic downturn.

It will be interesting to see if any country is able to use these bailouts to fix their economy. I’m expecting that no one is going to do well, but some European countries and probably Japan and South Korea will do a lot better than America. China is going to basically be fine as well.

The US is just so cartoonishly corrupt that it cannot possibly manage this level of crisis.

We are not going to get anything other than whatever it takes to keep us from rioting.

The reddit leftists getting all excited for Universal Basic Income (UBI) are well-intentioned I’m sure, but what kind of absolute baby do you have to be to not grasp just how corrupt America is?

Nancy Pelosi has $24,000 refrigerators.

Right now, there are people in a think tank figuring out how to prevent normal Americans from rioting for the least amount of money possible. A big part of that is going to be encouraging drug use, both by legalizing weed nationally and decriminalizing opioids.

The government is effectively going to launch a war against us, to try to keep us in a state of fear, despair, and general pacification, so that they can maintain the status quo amongst themselves. In order for them to maintain the status quo, they have to meet the demands first and foremost of the Jews and the mega-corporations.

The US has spent decades functioning as a powder keg, with the government pulling as much wealth as they can out of the masses of people while making sure to leave them enough that they don’t riot or do something like elect Donald Trump president. But in this new paradigm that the economic collapse has created, we’re not going to have anything for them to take from us, but they will still have to keep us from getting unmanageable.

Drugs are the single easiest and cheapest way to do that.

Other than drugs, they will give you something so you can eat. But that’s it. These reddit people are living in another reality.

All these posts and articles about UBI are citing Spain.

Well, Spain is a smaller country with a cohesive population and no multiculturalism, and the government is not nearly as corrupt.

The media is already framing the discussion along these lines.

So I think they are going to call whatever they do “UBI,” but it will barely give you enough to buy fentanyl.

The upside is that there’s a strong likelihood that the government will have to give up on its multiculturalism program, at least for a while. I think Trump is going to do as he said and ban immigration, and I think that is going to last for a while. I also think a lot of these Mexicans are going to pack up and go home in the early stages of this collapse, because subsistence farming is at least sustainable and probably not nearly as gloomy as a burned out America.

I have now officially seen leftists promoting the idea that the total economic collapse caused by this virus is going to lead to a Marxist utopia where no one works and the government gives us all UBI money.

Well, this same government that is supposed to do that can’t even give small businesses money when we still have some semblance of order. They do the old switcheroo and give the money to large corporations.

Bloomberg:

Shake Shack, the U.S.-based burger chain, will return its entire $10 million loan from the U.S. government, the company’s leaders said in a statement, amid widespread criticism over who got access to the funds aimed at saving small businesses before they were depleted.

More than a dozen publicly traded companies with revenue topping $100 million received funds before the program ran out of money, according to a Bloomberg review of regulatory filings. Lawmakers in Congress are said to be near an agreement to top up the loan program, while also providing new funds for hospitals and coronavirus testing.

“Shake Shack was fortunate last Friday to be able to access the additional capital we needed to ensure our long term stability through an equity transaction in the public markets,” said Chief Executive Officer Randy Garutti and Danny Meyer, the founder and chairman of Shake Shack and CEO of Union Square Hospitality Group.

“We’re thankful for that and we’ve decided to immediately return the entire $10 million PPP loan we received last week,” the pair said, “so that those restaurants who need it most can get it now.”

The sight of big companies getting aid while mom-and-pops complained they’d been frozen out of funding has sparked criticism of who was rescued by taxpayer dollars and who wasn’t.

The rest of the companies are not giving it back and Shake Shack is simply doing a publicity stunt.

I’m not impressed. Shake Shack can take their mediocre burgers and stupid post-modern architecture and go straight to hell.

Promoting socialism in America is utterly nonsensical. The same people calling for socialism point out how totally corrupt the government is, but then say that they want socialism to give the government vastly expanded abilities to tax the middle class and give the money to corporations.

It’s the old meme.

All of these policies that the socialists are calling for all the time are so easily exploited, and will be exploited. Obamacare was just a massive handout to insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies that the middle class had to pay for.

The idea that the government will use a lockdown to collapse the economy and put everyone out of work, and then the government will become good and pay for everyone’s life while they don’t work, just doesn’t make any sense at all.

Trump did give the one single $1,200 check – but the Democrats tried to stop that!

The government is not going to respond to the collapse of the economy by giving everyone free money. They are going to give all of that money to Jewish bankers.

They will probably do something to keep people from starving, and they will provide some form of mass homeless shelter program. Probably. But government soup and a bunk bed, that’s it. They’re not going to just give you money and let you stay in your house.

There is not even one single person in the government that could make this happen.

AOC has now completely sold out. Already. Jimmy Dore has been covering this. Very angrily.

Trump would probably be on board with it, but he is inept and surrounded by bloodsucking Jews.

These bizarre reddit cope narratives are emerging now that people are finally beginning to discuss the fact that the economy has completely collapsed, and they are all dumb.

There is no good outcome here, unless society just totally collapses in on itself. And that is only “good” in the sense of “good for history.” It certainly isn’t good for us. We are going to have to live through an absolute hell for a decade before we finally get to ride around on horses kidnapping women and forcing them into sexual slavery.

The Democrats are cockblocking your free money!

You’re supposed to be getting $1200, and $500 for each of your kids, but all of a sudden the Democrats are fiscal conservatives!

The Week:

The Senate voted 47-47 on a $1.8 trillion bill to shore up the economy during the COVID-19 coronavirus epidemic, far short of the 60 votes needed to advance the legislation. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who wrote the bill Saturday night, vowed Sunday night to bring it up for a vote again at 9:45 Monday morning, repeatedly daring Democrats to vote against it again as the stock market plummets further. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said no. Negotiations continued overnight.

Republicans are “throwing caution to the wind for average workers and people on Main Street and going balls to the wall for people on Wall Street,” Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) said Sunday. Schumer laid out most of the Democratic concerns about the legislation, which The Washington Post calls “by far the largest financial rescue ever attempted by Congress,” earning a three-word response from Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas).

Blah blah blah https://t.co/zkJ1fsKMGc

— Senator John Cornyn (@JohnCornyn) March 23, 2020

But Democrats weren’t the only ones concerned that the legislation gives too much to large corporations while demanding too little in return. “Any relief for big corporations must limit executive compensation, ban stock buybacks, and require companies to pay back loans w/ interest. Or I’m not voting for it,” Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) tweeted. Democrats voiced special concern about the $500 billion available to large companies with little oversight, including $425 million to be doled out at the discretion of Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, the recipients able to shield their identities for six months.

“We’re not here to create a slush fund for Donald Trump and his family, or a slush fund for the Treasury Department to be able to hand out to their friends,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said Sunday. Democrats also want the funds contingent on companies retaining 90 percent of their workers, not just “to the extent practicable,” as McConnell’s legislation allows. New York Times economic columnist Binyamin Appelbaum found that point the most baffling.

I’m sure the bill does give huge amounts of free money to corporations.

But I don’t really care about that. The government is going to do that anyway and the Democrats have always supported it. The reason they don’t support this is that it gives the people money, and they know that if Donald Trump gives the people free money, he will win the 2020 election.

What I’m concerned about is getting my $1200, and I literally do not care at all, in any way, about anything else.

All they have to do is turn on the money printer, it will go “brrrrr,” and everyone will be rich.

I will not let anyone’s alleged moral values (gay) get between me and my money.

It’s a good thing that the Coronavirus has shut Rand Paul’s faggot mouth.

Now it’s time for Trump to go full techno-futurism.

Trump and the GOP have a chance to outflank the Left on UBI, student loan forgiveness and actually bailing out working-class Americans, but devoted adherents to Ayn Rand theology ensures $$$ goes to bailout corporate America and not main street. Electoral disaster in November.

— VDARE (@vdare) March 22, 2020

We deserve to live in a world of free money, and this virus is just the ticket for Trump to roll out such a system.

The Democrats are trying to cockblock this because they know that if Trump gives people free money, his reign will be secured. Because when the rubber meets the race track, the only thing anyone actually wants the government to do is print money and then send it to them in envelopes.

Trump can go insane on the Democrats, and state the fact that they’re preventing people from getting free money. And eventually, they will crack. Especially since people like AOC will probably back Trump up.

Turn the money printer on, Donald.

We’re bored and we want to buy video games.

Roosh’s platform is revolutionary.

First and foremost, he’s bucking every modern political trend by running on an actual platform instead of on a long and vague, feels-based virtue signal that resembles a political platform.

Unlike pretty much everyone except Andrew Yang, he’s got a plan. A 6-point plan.

Three proposals stick out to me as being particularly appealing:

2,000 dollars a month for men in UBI and ZERO dollars for women

It’s not enough to just give everyone 1,000 bucks. If you give women the 1,000 dollars, they won’t value a man who has 1,000 dollars guaranteed to him by the government. It’s time to raise the status of men in our society at the expense of women to try and even out the scales a bit.

A selfie tax

A plan to start taxing cancerous forms of social media use is nothing short of revolutionary. Women would spend more time focused on their man and their families instead of on their phones, which they now love more than their own children. Furthermore, a tax on selfies and social media use would deliver a one-two punch to the gut and gaping wound where the groin used to be of the trannies running Silicon Valley. Every out-of-work Google employee is a win for the anti-Globalist rebel alliance, as is every roastie crying about losing access to her beta providers.

Mass conversion to Orthodoxy

Look.

The fact of the matter is that Orthodoxy is the religion that is most aesthetically compatible with the grimdark hellscape of the near future.

We could adopt it simply because of the sweet aesthetics that it’s got going for it and it would be the right decision, regardless.

Remember: the optics pill is the final red pill.

“Optics must trample under foot all faith and reason…” – so spaketh Roy the Aesthetic (year 2019 of the Occupation Era, the Stormer Annals)

Orthodoxy is also unburdened by the problem of having a cuck Pope (Catholics) and systematized Jew-worship (Protestants).

Most importantly, the Orthodox Church isn’t as universalist as all that.

The Orthodox Church is built on the principle of nations. The nation is explicitly the building block of the faith – not the individual. This is why you have the Greek Orthodox Church, the Russian Orthodox Church, and so on. Different nations have their own churches – that teach the universal truth of Christ, sure, but which also take care of the different needs of their specific communities in ways that are compatible with the local traditions.

So yes, I too support the idea of forced conversions to Orthodoxy at gunpoint by Roosh Wing Death Squads. 

It’ll be a very popular proposal at the polls too, I bet.

Mostly though, I like the assertive nature of the Roosh campaign.

Nowadays, politicians don’t do concrete proposals anymore.

I think that it is quite simply a product of them having literally no power even when they assume office, so having promised a lot of concrete things would be problematic for them. So they promise nothing and give out feels-based poopy talk when they speak to the crowds of fat women and hormonally-imbalanced soymen.

Admittedly, that is probably a smart move on the part of the politicians.

Why stand for something when you can stand for everything… and stand up on random furniture as well while you’re at it?

But I’m not a chump voter who votes for feels and values and rhetoric.

I vote for people who promise me free stuff.

At this point, only two politicians – Yang and Roosh – have offered to pay for my vote. Of the two, one has helped me get laid in the past and offers 2,000 dollars as opposed to 1,000.

Idk about you, but I think I’ve made up my mind about 2020.

There is nothing that I hate more than a coffee shop barista.

No other profession is such a cock tease. No other profession has snared as many unsuspecting men both young and old.

How many men have dropped their hard-earned dollars and loose change into those heart-adorned tip jars, hoping against hope for something more than a terse smile from the seemingly accessible, but oh so distant 7/10 barista girl at the cozy cafe on the corner.

Thankfully, these frumpy, frazzled, “girl-next-door” fantasies will come to an end with the dawning of the robot age.

SF Gate:

In the food industry, it seems, the robot revolution is well underway, with machines mastering skilled tasks that have always been performed by people.

In Boston, robots have replaced chefs and are creating complex bowls of food for customers. In Prague, machines are displacing bartenders and servers using an app. In Denver, they’re taking orders at a fast food drive through.

Robots are even making the perfect loaf of bread these days, taking charge of an art that has remained in human hands for thousands of years.

Now comes Briggo, a company that has created a fully automated, robotic brewing machine that that can push out 100 cups of coffee in a single hour — equaling the output of three to four baristas, according to the company.

Using a blend of Latin American beans, the machine — known as a “coffee haus” — creates customized cups of gourmet coffee that can be ordered via an app, giving customers control over ingredients, espresso shots, flavorings and temperature without any human interaction. The company says no other business in the world has applied as much technology to “specialty coffee.” 

For the women themselves, the job is also complete trash.

No other profession provides the same level of deceptive illusion that you can “make it” in the big city. That you can study and work at the same time. That you have your life in order so long as you have this “job” part-time. That someday, an artsy but rich patron might meander on in and sweep them off their feet with promises of financial support and access to high society where they’re sure to fit in and belong once they finish up their graduate art degree.

Nater said he has no doubt his machine makes cups of coffee as well, if not better, than a human barista. Referring to the robot as a “high speed, totally controlled food factory,” he said that unlike human workers a machine doesn’t get flustered when business gets busy. By looking at analytics, he said, he can ensure that the robot is hitting “all of it’s quality marks.”

But Oliver Geib, a 24-year-old barista at Ceremony Coffee Roasters in Annapolis, Md., remained skeptical. As coffee is being made by a barista, he said, subtly gauging the ratio of water to grind as flavor develops through refined taste tests, is a crucial part of the process.

Lol okay, Oliver. 

“All the numbers and data in the world can’t actually tell you how the coffee tastes,” Geib said. “A big part of what a human brings is being able to taste the coffee during the process of dialing in the flavor.”

Oliver is cope-posting. No one taste-tests your coffee before handing it to you, so his point is invalid.

And if it needs taste-tested, robots have better taste than art school faggots and cock-teasing art school whores.

Asked whether he was worried about losing his job to a robot, Geib said, “absolutely not.” Though he sees the value of robots making coffee at particular locations when customers are short on time, he said there’s a loyal group of people who will always seek out the slower, interactive experiences at coffee shops.

“A lot of customers really appreciate watching a barista carefully pouring water or steaming the milk or adding a little flourish to their drink,” he said. “The social aspect, the atmosphere and the interaction with the barista, is a big part of the experience of drinking coffee.”

… said no one ever.

Face it, Oliver. You and your whole industry have about 5 years left, max.

The only segment of the barista workforce that should, in theory, be safe are the stripper-baristas up in Cascadia.

It’s also far more honest, as well.

Unfortunately, we run in a country that is selectively prudish, and in many ways Neo-Puritan. Regular red-blooded male desires are still outlawed, while female and fag sexual desires are decriminalized and promoted everywhere.

These bikini barista shops are systematically being closed down by hag-ladies who no doubt think an 11-year-old boy twerking for dollar tips from grown men is just fine and dandy, but businesses who understand that men come to coffee shops to fantasize about the waitresses, not to “watch baristas steam milk” as Oliver the Hipster alleges and who decided to offer a more streamlined experience are shut down.

It’s all very sad when you think about it.

We just can’t seem to have nice things in America.

Say what you will about AOC and the other brown women who are in Congress now, but they’re the only ones with the stones to stand up to powerful kike institutions like Wells Fargo.

Have you ever seen a midwestern gud boi cuck politician grill a megabank like this?

Fox News:

Wells Fargo CEO Tim Sloan fired back at New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez at a contentious hearing in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, after the freshman legislator accused the bank of “financing the caging of children” and suggested it should bear financial liability for everything from oil spills to climate change.

The CEO of Wells Fargo said they chose to finance the unstable Dakota Access Pipeline over Standing Rock Sioux objections, because the bank determined it was “worth the risk.”

To whom?#DAPL has leaked at least 5x. And we, the public, are left to pay for cleanup+destroyed land. https://t.co/ugGY1BeBdO

— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) March 12, 2019

Ocasio-Cortez’s inquiries come as activists increasingly seek to “deplatform” political opponents by cutting off their funding from banks and other financial services providers — a concerted effort that conservatives and libertarians have said threatens free speech.

House Financial Services Committee Chairman Maxine Waters, D-Calif., brought Sloan before the panel Tuesday as part of a broad, four-hour inquiry into widely reported fraudulent misconduct in recent years by Wells Fargo employees. But in questioning Sloan, who faced bipartisan criticism during the hearing, Ocasio-Cortez, a self-described Democratic socialist, quickly went much further.

“Why was the bank involved in the caging of children and financing the caging of children to begin with?” Ocasio-Cortez asked at one point, in an apparent reference to the Trump administration’s zero-tolerance immigration policy, which resulted in increased separations of parents suspected of criminal activity from the minors who accompanied them.

The White House has pointed out that images widely circulated on social media showing migrant children in large, fenced-off detention rooms were taken during the Obama administration.

Sloan responded simply, “I don’t know how to answer that question, because we weren’t.”

Clearly, the whole cuck phenomenon isn’t an IQ or knowledge-based thing.

First Omar takes down Jewish war shills, now AOC is taking down Jew banks.

As you can tell from the lines of questioning they’re using, AOC and her bulbhead friend clearly aren’t the brightest bulbs in the… bulb-shed. But it only took them like a month in Washington, DC to figure out that the Jews run everything with their Benjamins and their AIPACs and their complete strangleholds on both parties.

If these two could figure it out, what’s that say about all the other Boomer cucks that we send to Washington?

You think they don’t know the score?

Furthermore, the truth is that AOC’s platform is very appealing. She’s one of the few ones out there talking about GIVING MILLENNIALS SOME $$$$$$$.

Cost of the GOP Tax Scam for the rich:💰~$1.8-2.3 Trillion

Cost of forgiving all student loans in America:💰~$1.5 Trillion

Clearly where there’s a will, there’s a way.

When people say that there isn’t “enough” to do these things, what they mean is they don’t *want* to do them. https://t.co/RvcYk8kbEy

— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) March 13, 2019

You may argue that she hates White people and that’s true. But she’s the only one out there specifically advocating for Millennials, which is being overlooked.

And how bad is she, really? Like, in context.

Compare her to your standard Boomer politicians – Republican or Democrat, it doesn’t really matter. They all hate Millennials equally and want us to suffer because they’re old and retarded. Most of them don’t particularly like White people either. As a White Millennial, I at least get something resembling less than open contempt out of AOC and her platform. She’s talking about how shit-tier the wages are for interns and entry-level positions and pointing out that it’s time for the boomers and the banks and the big businesses to start sharing the wealth… or else.

Kind of like Yang.

Also, that’s the thing that Yang and AOC have in common: they make Boomers absolutely lose their minds. And I do love seeing those ham-necked boomers throwing sweaty internet tantrums about her and her plans to redistribute their social security to Millennials and brown people (though they won’t ever name the latter, because they’re that big of cowardly welps).

Yang is clearly superior though because he doesn’t hate White people, only orange people.

Ideally, we could have a merger between AOC’s and Yang’s platforms. 

I support a forgiveness plan for a huge chunk of student loans. Young people should be buying homes, starting families and starting businesses and not trapped in their parents’ basement paying off phantom loans for years. It’s a better stimulus than shoveling money to banks. https://t.co/0vdyFAQ0Fh

— Andrew Yang (@AndrewYangVFA) March 14, 2019

1000 bucks a month ONLY for Millennials and Zoomers (once they turn 18).

This would be paid for with a VAT sure, but also supplemented by canceling the Boomers’ social security and redirecting the money to a fund that will be used to pay off young people’s college debts, get them into starter houses and give them some pocket money every month to throw at their favorite Twitch e-Thot.

Because they gotta eat too.