twitter – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com Daily Stormer Historical Archive Thu, 23 Oct 2025 15:47:35 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.17 https://www.anglinarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/cropped-favicon-32x32.png twitter – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com 32 32 Astroturf Bonanza: Double-Talking Kook Nick Fuentes Continues Flooding Internet with Lies and Gibberish https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/10/23/astroturf-bonanza-double-talking-kook-nick-fuentes-continues-conquering-internet-with-lies-and-gibberish/ Thu, 23 Oct 2025 15:47:35 +0000

Following the death of Charlie Kirk, all sorts of weird things are going on.

It has “rallied the MAGA base” in a depraved manner, similar to the way the nation was rallied after 9/11. Clearly, this was intended by the administration, which has worked with all of these “alternative media influencers,” to stoke the hysteria. We are hearing from Trump that there is an “enemy within,” and he appears to be describing more than the immigrants. There is some kind of Antifa narrative, apparently.

This is all very convenient. I’m not saying that someone in the White House said “they won’t quit talking about the Epstein Files and they’re still upset about these wars? The podcasters are all talking about Palantir and this Peter Thiel antichrist thing? Well, I don’t know – murder Charlie Kirk, I guess.” But it is not hard to imagine that someone at the White House said precisely those words before the shooting.

Basically, every MAGA person is now calling for a police state. Further, they demand much more extreme censorship than Democrats ever called for. Whereas Joe Biden secretly communicated with social media companies, ordering them to censor things he did not like, the Trump Administration is openly threatening to use the power of government to silence people. Pam Bondi, who is a really dumb bitch, is saying she is going to start arresting people “on both sides” for “hate speech,” something which is not only not illegal, but which the Supreme Court has repeatedly said does not exist and cannot exist in America.

In 2017, during Matal v. Tam, the most recent instance of hate speech being brought before the court, Judge Alito wrote in the unanimous opinion:

Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express ‘the thought that we hate.’

Last month, as a response to Charlie’s death, Bondi, who is currently operating in the position of the highest office of any lawyer on the planet, announced that without any law, she will begin targeting and arresting people for legal speech.

Meanwhile, Trump has taken to using comic book villain rhetoric about “an invasion from within” as he releases the military onto the streets for unclear purposes.

Citing Kirk’s death, James “JD Vance” Bowman is talking about retraining law enforcement to focus on political enemies of the president.

Within the context of this new war against political “enemies within,” Trump is talking about using American cities as training grounds for the US military.

The initial explanation for the deployment of military forces and paramilitary forces onto the streets of the country was immigration. This involved masked ICE agents randomly grabbing people off of the streets, out of church parking lots, and throwing them into vans.

It was my assertion that this would expand to political enemies, and we are now seeing this happening. It was clearly ridiculous to any adult that ICE was going to round up tens of millions of people one at a time and deport them. It was further never explained why the feds were building concentration camps inside of the United States for immigrants (who would presumably be deported).

What I pointed out repeatedly was that you could get rid of upwards of 95% of illegal immigrants by simply making it a serious felony to employ or rent housing to them. With nowhere to work and nowhere to live, they would just leave. You would not need to send military men in masks to throw them into vans. You can go ahead and research why it is that the feds are not targeting the employers and landlords of illegal immigrants. Ask the AI, maybe. There is of course no explanation, despite the fact that this would cost virtually nothing.

The only explanation as to why they would choose these terror raids, choose to release the military, I asserted, is that they are not actually trying to remove every immigrant one by one, but rather trying to get people used to the idea of military and militarized police on the streets throwing random people into vans. I asserted that this military force, along with the system of camps they are building, would be used against non-immigrants. And after Charlie’s murder, we saw the building of the narrative about political enemies, setting up this precise framework.

Meanwhile, the FBI is refusing to answer any of the nagging questions surrounding the murder of Charlie Kirk, and is treating it effectively as a closed case. It’s a good thing no one in the media is pressing them on any of their claims.

There are many, many questions about this murder, but the most obvious is probably how it is that Charlie Kirk’s neck was stronger than a 3/8-inch-thick piece of steel.

Again, there are a whole lot of questions. This one is just the most obvious, which alone is more than enough to prove that the FBI’s story of Charlie Kirk’s murder is a lie.

This is what a .30-06 round, shot at the same distance as Charlie was shot from, does to a 3/8-inch-thick piece of steel. You can find dozens of videos of the same and similar tests being done.

While the FBI refuses to comment, the media has claimed this was a “miracle.”

TPUSA’s spokesman, Andrew Kolvet, has also claimed it was a “miracle.”

It is all very surreal.

It’s happening alongside a whole load of other surreal happenings. Trump is declaring he’s established peace in Israel while Bibi is publicly assuring his supporters no such thing has occurred. He’s made a complete reversal on the Ukraine war. He is blowing up random boats off the coast of Venezuela claiming that they are cocaine traffickers responsible for Chinese fentanyl from Mexico.

It feels like a kind of “shock and awe” campaign to overwhelm the public. But the public is very excited about it, after having been whipped into a frenzy over Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

Standing on Charlie’s Corpse, Nick Fuentes has Been Astroturfed as the Most Important Right-Wing Voice on the Internet

Something that is personally very surreal to me is the fact that Nick Fuentes is clearly being positioned by very powerful people to be a new “voice for the youth.” For those who don’t know, and for the sake of full disclosure, Fuentes spent years as my Padawan, basing his show on my materials. Two years ago, I disavowed him due to his decision to associate with and promote Richard Spencer, and then to openly tie himself to documented FBI informant Chuck Johnson. I am a really cool guy, I’m totally super edgy and doesn’t afraid of anything. But I have a hard rule that I do not associate with anyone who associates with FBI informants.

Nick Fuentes pictured with federal informant Charles Johnson. I don’t know if Fuentes has ever explained why he decided to establish this relationship, but according to his followers, Fuentes is not a fed, he is just friends with them and cooperates with them to make content. Notably, court documents show that Johnson not only worked as an informant himself, but was also tasked with recruiting other informants. But hey. Who knows, right? It doesn’t really even matter at this point.

Before I denounced him, Fuentes spent years citing me as his biggest influence, and would use my articles as the basis of virtually every show he did. Now that he has become this alleged superstar, it’s worth analyzing in some detail just what the hell is going on here.

For basic context: he supported Trump until some point before the election. Then he became anti-Trump. However, his current “anti-Trump” stance is that Trump is not doing enough censorship, not doing the police state hard enough, and so on. It’s actually hard to follow, which is sort of the underlying point I want to try to highlight today: it’s all very garbled.

For unclear reasons, Charlie Kirk dying meant that Nick Fuentes became very important, and was all of a sudden everywhere. No one has explained why, and I think I am the only person asking why. But it is clearly astroturf.

When Charlie died, Fuentes said he was too distraught to do a show. Then the next day, he did this really emotional show where the ideas being communicated were confusing to say the least. He started campaigning for mass censorship, and for some kind of domestic terrorism operation or something. (I covered his early post-assassination campaign here.)

He was clearly calling for some kind of police state involving precrime, a la the program being pushed by Palantir:

He actually went so far as to imply that some unspecific left-wing violence group was more of a threat than Israel and Palantir.

I have no idea who these “millions of Americans” he is referring to are. “Antifa” is the only violent leftist political group I’m aware of, and there are not millions of them. In fact, I would be surprised if there were thousands. In all likelihood, Antifa was more or less entirely organized by the FBI itself, as the group existed almost exclusively as a way to shut down right-wing political activism. (Note that whenever you saw arrest photos, they appeared to be standard junkies, who were likely paid to engage in these activities.) Their disappearance after Biden took office, and their failure to reemerge during a second Trump Administration which has much more institutional backing than the first time around, certainly indicates they were operated by the state. Regardless, the implication that Antifa is a bigger threat than Palantir or Israel is obscene. Despite Fuentes’ stated opposition to Trump, downplaying the two biggest influences on the Trump government while calling for a focus on “the enemy within” fits very neatly into Trump’s current agenda of establishing a domestic police state.

In the days following Charlie’s death, Fuentes also appeared to go along with various calls for people to be arrested for “celebrating” the event:

He called in the FBI and demanded Jackson Hinkle be sent to prison for suggesting Israel was involved in the Kirk assassination:

He later walked most of that back, with a “pay no attention to your lying eyes” explanation that he was “misunderstood.” He said he didn’t want people to go to prison, even though he said to Jackson “you are going to prison.” He said he wasn’t calling for “hate speech laws” but rather for the government to pressure businesses into firing and silencing people who weren’t sufficiently sad about Charlie’s death and/or questioned the official story.

As we will see, he regularly says things and then says the opposite thing without acknowledging he is doing this. “The internet is forever” and so on, but he has now apparently created an audience that is too stupid to notice these sorts of things. (I also have questions as to how big of an audience he actually has, given that this “rise” is such a classic astroturf campaign, which I will get into below.)

The Conspiracy Theory That Went Too Far for the Mega-Kook

Fuentes tried to distance himself from me and my content following my denunciation of him. He continued reading my site and using some of my material, but whereas he’d been proud of my support for him previously, he was clearly ashamed to be using me as his main source after I’d denounced him. To make it less obvious that all of the good ideas he ever had were from my website, he went out and tried to make up some of his own conspiracy theories about various things, which became increasingly bizarre. It was stuff I would never say, and I think that was part of the point. It is also possible that he actually believes he is some kind of genius who is able to formulate genius theories no one else can think of. He was called a genius when copying my material, and I think this caused him some confusion about his own ability to do analysis.

I have not watched his show regularly in years, but people have sent me clips of some very wild theories. Just as an example, he told people that the Taylor Swift Dance Club stabbing that took place in England on July 29, 2024, was a false flag attack by Israel. Three girls between the ages of six and nine were killed by one Axel Rudakubana, the son of Christian immigrants from Rwanda. There wasn’t any evidence for the theory and it didn’t make any sense, but he said Israel did it to stop the pro-Palestine protests that were happening in the country. He claimed Netanyahu ordered the alleged Trump assassination attempt so the GOP would install Nikki Haley as president. There are many such cases, with very extreme assertions often relying on a single datapoint, and regularly presented as established fact. You will learn about quite a few of his theories below.

Given that he was so aggressive in promoting often totally nonsensical theories, it is very strange then that Fuentes is now claiming that there is nothing at all suspicious about the killing of Charlie Kirk, and going so far as to promote a conspiracy theory that anyone who says the assassination is suspicious and that the government may not be telling the whole truth is a Russian agent. Specifically, he has listed Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Jackson Hinkle, and Max Blumenthal as secret agents of Russia.

Fuentes has publicly accused Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, and Max Blumenthal of violating the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA) and working for Russia to try to discredit the FBI
Fuentes’ theories of right-wing media personalities being secretly paid by Russia to discredit US intelligence agencies mirror theories promoted by Rachel Maddow during the first Trump term. She was eventually sued for defamation by one of her targets, though the court decided she was “not presenting the claim as fact.”
Fuentes’ theories also mirror those promoted for years by Democrat politicians, including Hillary Clinton

After years of supporting Russia when he was using my material as the basis of his show, he has pivoted to Democrat-style theories about Russians trying to undermine faith in our institutions. Many people would consider this theory of Russian agents secretly paying some of the most popular right-wing pundits in America to discredit the FBI to be a much wilder conspiracy theory than the suggestion that the FBI could be lying about what is apparently the biggest act of political violence since 9/11.

It is notably unclear where exactly Fuentes is going with this theory. The most obvious explanation would be that he is involved with the FBI and they are telling him to promote anti-Russian materials while defending their official narrative about Charlie Kirk. This would certainly go a long way towards explaining why, after Kirk’s death, he has been pulled from obscurity into the mainstream of the right-wing internet media. He has appeared on podcasts or shows with Patrick Bet-David, the Nelk Boys, Red Scare, Glenn Greenwald, Hodgetwins, Russell Brand, Dave Smith, and others. Given that there is no hard evidence of an organic increase in interest in Fuentes or his “back the FBI or you’re a Russian” claims after Kirk’s death, this is the definition of “astroturf.” (Note: though it’s beyond the scope of this piece, these “alternative media” people all have agents who communicate through backchannels, just like “mainstream media” personalities, so the logistics of an astroturf campaign in this space are not complex.)

One may wish to give the benefit of the doubt, to try to steelman a position where he is innocently spreading “Russian meddling” theories. It is unclear how this would be done. It’s not believable that anyone actually believes Charlie had a “neck of steel.” And it is incomprehensible that someone who has spent so many years framing himself as an opponent of the US empire would all of a sudden start defending the FBI and claiming Russians are attempting to discredit it.

It is particularly strange that he is going so hard in attacking people for claiming Israel may have assassinated Charlie Kirk, given that he has framed himself as some kind of extreme opponent of Israel and the Jews. Again, no serious adult believes the official story, given that it is physically impossible and relies on a “steel neck miracle.” Given that Israel is infamous for doing political assassinations all over the planet, and given that it aligns with Israel’s interests, it is certainly well within the bounds of rational discourse to consider that Israel may have been behind Kirk’s death.

To attempt to silence discussion of possible Israeli involvement in the killing with claims of Russian disinformation makes this shilling almost cartoonish. You see him being rewarded for this shilling all over the place with this massive astroturf.

“Russian Meddling” Narrative Glitch

Claiming that people questioning the FBI’s narrative on Kirk are Russian agents necessarily creates a whole series of narrative problems.

To wit, one would have to assume that anyone who believes that Owens, Carlson, Blumenthal, and Hinkle are being paid by Russia to discredit the FBI’s claims about Charlie’s assassination are also working for Russia to discredit the FBI’s claims about Epstein, the State Department’s claims about the Ukraine war, and so on and on. It simply would not make sense if these individuals were Russian agents only on the issue of Charlie Kirk’s death. Right? I mean, that’s crazy obvious, is it not? I mean, did they just start working for Russia, sometime between the FBI’s Epstein scandal and the assassination of Charlie Kirk? So like, they were being real when they questioned the FBI about Epstein, but then they got hired by Israel to discredit the FBI, so they’re doing a Russian op questioning them about Charlie? I guess it would have to be either that, or that Fuentes actually supports the FBI’s claims about Epstein.

Wait, here he is in July saying Candace works for Russia. In one of his very interesting and brilliant original theories, he says Candace believing Macron’s wife is a tranny is proof she works for Russia. And she interviewed Andrew Tate. Also, working for Ben Shapiro indicates a Russian angle. (That’s the theory. This is this person’s content.)

“Candace is definitely Russian,” he says. Here’s another clip of him saying the same thing a week later, just so you’re clear this wasn’t just some random comment. (In the context of an interview, he backs down from “definitely” and says “speculative.” It’s worth watching if you want a bit more information on how he just pulls theories out of nothing at all. Fantastically, he says “maybe two years ago, I didn’t believe any of this.” It’s a great compliment to me.)

Just you wait. It gets dumber before it gets even dumber.

Before he was astroturfed all over the place, he could make a stupid claim, then just delete his posts and move on. But with this new attention on him, these tactics are not working. He is clearly not “ready for prime time.”

Just for the record, I am not only banned from Twitter, but linking this site on Twitter is also prohibited. It is listed as “dangerous.” Despite having the great privilege to be on Twitter and having his account boosted at every turn, Fuentes regularly posts on Telegram instead so that people cannot respond to him and question his claims. During his attacks on Candace Owens for questioning the official story of Kirk’s death, he attacked her on Telegram for claiming Netanyahu offered Kirk $150 million.

When I saw that, I said “hold on a second, he was promoting that himself!” Various fellows on my forum told me “oh no dude, he might not usually be consistent, but he’s been consistent on this for sure.” My bro said this to me:

I just about snapped.

After smashing everything in my room, it then took me an hour to find the clip:

On the Bibi offer of $150 million, he says: “I have independently confirmed that by the way, I’ve heard that from four [handsign, FOUR] people. Four people that I trust, that are in the know. So this is coming from Candace Owens, a friend of Charlie Kirk, this is coming from Max Blumenthal, who purports to have a source, and I have heard, from a handful of people independently of those sources, that this offer was real.”

Here’s the face he makes after saying that:

(The original video on Nick’s Rumble is here. It starts at 1:06:00.)

He holds up four (4) fingers to stress that four (4) of his sources have confirmed this thing that he now claims was a Candace Owens hoax.

So why did it take me an hour to find it? Well, because the main tweet which spread this claim, a tweet by @ImperiumFirst which had millions of views, was deleted.

I then found a deleted reddit post:

I also came across this in my searching:

That link leads to this:

But wait: there is a reupload of that video.

“Where did we get this $150 million figure? We got it from Candace Owens and Max Blumenthal.” He then goes on to say that Candace and Blumenthal claim they never said that. (I don’t know if they said that. They are also under investigation by me, but not in this article.) He also says in this clip “my credibility is now on the line.” Yeah, no shit. What happened to your four very reliable sources???

He does not mention those four sources he claimed to have, putting the entire thing on Candace and Max.

(I found the original video on Nick’s Rumble, here. It starts at 2:04:00.)

Just a side note here: Fuentes refers to his “groypers” as “Elite Human Capital.”

Here’s the one who’s talking in that clip:

Going through these clips, I also found this one:

Just, I mean. If anyone is keeping track of the physiognomy patterns found among these EHCs, you might want to note those two.

So what about the deleted tweet from @ImperiumFirst? The one that had millions of views? Well, that’s a totally pro-Fuentes account (Imperium First instead of Fuentes’ America First. It’s a Warhammer gag, you see. These EHCs are very clever with stuff like that). One wouldn’t have to be a kook conspiracy theorist to imagine Fuentes DM’d him and asked him to delete that tweet. I mean. Why else would he have deleted it? He knew the statements had been clipped and didn’t want it reposted in the comments section, so he posted his claim that Candace was responsible for the $150 million theory on Telegram.

This is how he is used to operating. It works when you’re an obscure streamer. When you’re the next big thing, it probably doesn’t work as well. This is the definition of “not ready for prime time.”

You might be thinking “oh, so he lied about having sources for a claim, then he decided to completely change his own narrative, and then he covered his tracks so he didn’t look like a stupid liar, wow, is that such a big deal?” Firstly, yes. How the hell can you have a person you trust for information lying to you and covering it up? Like, sure, give him the benefit of the doubt that he believes the “steel neck miracle theory” and all of the rest of it. He definitely knew that he claimed he had four sources, and his viral clip (later deleted) was most responsible for spreading this $150 million theory. Then he lied and said the claim came exclusively from Candace and Max. As he is building a narrative that anyone who claims the FBI is dishonest is a Russian agent.

Oh, and lest we forget: he is also now promoting the idea that Russia is working with Israel.

I’m sure there is some zany kookspiracy theory explaining how Russia’s nearly century-long alliances with all of Israel’s enemies, including their current support and arming of Iran, is all somehow fake or whatever. But yes, while Fuentes is claiming that Russia is paying Candace, Tucker, etc. to blame Israel, he also claims Russia is secretly best friends with Israel. So, you know. Don’t really know what to say about that, but it certainly adds yet another layer of “wait, what?” to this layer cake of confounding gibberish.

But wait.

Can it get dumber? 

People Can Have Opinions

To be clear, I do not know what happened to Charlie Kirk. At first, the official story, that he was killed by a radical trans supporter, made sense to me. The story started to make less and less sense the more I heard about it. There is a lot you can go into. There is a lot of disinformation mixed in with legitimate theories. But the “steel neck miracle” thing is something you can zoom in on that cannot be true. What I had initially assumed is that the bullet went through his neck and into some concrete or brick behind him. Now that it has been established that the official story is that the bullet was stuck in his neck, “just under the skin,” it is impossible for anyone to genuinely believe the official story. However, let’s say we give Fuentes all the benefits of all the doubts, assume he is very unfamiliar with guns, and maybe hasn’t taken the 1-2 minutes it would take to research how a .30-06 round could be stopped by a human neck at that range. Lashing out at people who question the FBI is very strange, a conspiracy kook saying this monumental event should be accepted at face value is very out of character, and when you add this “Russian meddling” gibberish, it becomes too much.

What is the big deal? Why go so hard trying to defame people who are asking questions? And are we really supposed to believe that his defense of Israel and his attacks on Russia are completely unrelated to a spontaneous astroturf campaign? Does anyone believe that?

Also, to further clarify my own position here, I am not a defender of Owens, Carlson, or Blumenthal, all of whom I have issues with, and may even be suspicious of. Carlson definitely needs to explain what he was doing in Nicaragua in the 1980s, for example. However, I do not take issue with them questioning the FBI’s narrative of the Kirk shooting, just like I don’t take issue with them questioning the FBI’s narrative about Epstein, or really anything else. (Note: I do take some issue with Candace’s theories about Macron’s wife being a tranny. Though I also think it is hilarious.)

Just as an example here, if I was going to accuse Carlson of something, I would accuse him of purposefully mixing a lot of good information with some very bad information, which is a very basic disinformation tactic. He is very hawkish on China, he promotes the UFO and aliens hoax, and he has appeared at points to support gay marriage and other liberal sexual norms I do not think belong in a Christian society. “Limited hangout” is a piece of CIA jargon describing a situation where the official story no longer holds up, so you admit the truth in part while withholding other truths, which is how a lot of the “alternative media” seems to function. However, the only entity that would be running this kind of operation would be the US government. And indeed, just months ago, Fuentes was accusing Carlson of being a CIA operative. Now he’s accusing him of being a Russian agent trying to discredit US intelligence. So, is it both? He is working with the Kremlin and the CIA to discredit the FBI?

Note: I understand I am belaboring the point here. But as I have seen no one else with any kind of large platform questioning the “Astonishing Rise of Nick Fuentes,” I feel it is necessary to be thorough, and to make it fully clear just how bizarre this all is. We need all of this on the record.

Who are the Fans of Nick Fuentes?

Along with all of these shows, there has been a barrage of mainstream media articles about Fuentes. It’s actually overwhelming, constant press. Type his name into any news aggregator.

What’s highly notable is that much of this coverage is neutral, if not bordering on positive. Whenever he made the media during his time under my tutelage, he was referred to in any headline as a “neo-Nazi” or a “white supremacist,” and these terms have been replaced with “far right” or “white nationalist.” I’ve read a lot of these articles, and none of them note any of the weird theories, which as far as I can tell, are his core content at this point. By not pointing out things like “he says Tucker Carlson works for both Russia and the CIA,” they are effectively running cover for him. No one who is prone to supporting right-wing politics is going to be turned off by any of this. Six weeks out from Charlie’s death, there are daily articles from the likes of Mediate and Raw Story just reporting on things he said.

Last week, GQ called him a sex symbol.

In an almost unbelievable alleged coincidence, literally the day before Charlie’s death, the New York Times published a piece about him that was as close to a puff piece as the Times has ever given anyone who spent years denying the Holocaust and praising Hitler. In a case of eerie precision or you know, something else, the Times writers predicted “rising influence.”

What is interesting is that aside from Ron Unz and myself, I don’t really see anyone critically questioning what is going on here. There isn’t any discussion of really anything about him, anywhere. There are these media articles, which present a boilerplate narrative about how he was on the fringe and now he’s mainstream. They don’t attempt to offer any insight into it, other than that “young people are turning to the far right.”

Note: I haven’t seen any of them mention me. There is a hard blackout in the media of my name (that’s what happens when the establishment is actually afraid of what you’re doing). I am mentioned only in very specific contexts. But it is quite a thing to talk about Nick Fuentes’ rise and not mention me. Long time readers, who also followed Fuentes, know that I’m not exaggerating this: his entire show, for over five years, was based on my website. And it isn’t simply that he would copy the material, but he would credit me on the show, call me his hero and his biggest influence. It’s actually sad to think about. I guess I can just say that. This whole thing is still a bit emotional for me. I don’t think that makes me a pussy. I believed he was copying me because he believed in my material. Certainly, without having used my material for all those years, he never would have been notable. He is charismatic enough, and has oratory skills, but if he had come out of the gates with this kookspiracy stuff, there never would have been any real traction.

Here’s the question though: who are all these people following him? Where is the evidence that they exist? If he has all of these hundreds of thousands of followers, why is there no critical discussion of him anywhere?

In what was clearly a stunt and part of the astroturf campaign, he had a Spotify account for a few days, and it is claimed that it became the number one podcast in the world.


He said he didn’t make the account, that some random person just started uploading the shows, and that resulted in it becoming number one.

That does not even seem possible. How would the podcast be promoted in the first place if he didn’t tell people about it? Assuming it got caught in an algorithm, are we to believe that no one is monitoring the charts at all?

Based on his YouTube followers, and the pictures of his followers we’ve seen in public since his split with me, his followers we can prove exist are a bunch of grotesque Mexican gargoyles. Is it possible that Hispanics didn’t know about him, and he is just really appealing to them? That is possible. Hispanics do this with their stars. But it can’t explain the numbers.

All of the material you see posted as comments anywhere looks like bots. On Twitter, for example, you don’t find the kind of back-and-forth between posters that you would see on really any other person’s Twitter comments. There is nothing negative. It is just a bunch of slogans and cringe memes.

Here are some top memes posted on a recent Fuentes tweet:

What is going on there? Those are humans? Bots? Boomers? Indians?

Note: It may seem trite, but as a founding member and former leader of the Alt-Right, the fact that our people were always funny was very important to me, as it was evidence of high intelligence and good socialization. If I was running a movement and my followers were just posting “GOAT” and “cope and seethe” and GIFs from Office Space, I might have considered pulling a Fuentes and selling them out to the feds. No, I joke. But only because I hate the feds so much. In all seriousness though, I definitely would have considered selling them into slavery to build skyscrapers in Dubai.

Just go look yourself. I just clicked the top post and found this at the top:

Here’s the account:

It’s a bunch of similar memes, and replies to known botted-out accounts.

Elon Musk:

End Wokeness:

No joke, that was the first one I clicked.

The second one I clicked was this:

And the account is a bunch of reposts of viral dog videos.

Go through and investigate yourself. @NickJFuentes. Scroll through the comments on any tweet and see what you see. Click through randomly on the commenters. See what you see.

I’m obviously not saying he has no followers. He had followers before the media and the “influencer network” started pushing him like this. I don’t know whether Rumble has a good record for accurate viewer numbers, but after Elon Musk personally decided to give Fuentes his account back, his numbers on Rumble, where he primarily streams, went from an average of 20,000 views to nearly ten times that. But there is clearly a concerted campaign by both establishment and “alternative” media to present him as a phenomenon, and there simply is no evidence that the interest matches the hype.

Insofar as these groypers (often called “mugus” by those critical of Fuentes) are real people, they do not engage in any form of critical analysis of his materials. If you ever come across one, ask them to name one thing Fuentes was ever wrong about. They will become very uncomfortable, and simply begin calling you names.

They are now repeating his narrative about how everyone who questions the integrity of the FBI or anything else Nick Fuentes supports is a Russian agent. Last month, Ron Unz of Unz.com, where my articles are often reposted, cited me when questioning exactly what was going on with Fuentes, and many of the allegedly human followers of Fuentes attacked Unz without even attempting to address or defend Fuentes’ new position on “Russian meddling.”

Note that after Fuentes stopped promoting the Daily Stormer as his primary influence, he began citing Unz as his favorite website.

They Call Him “NATO Nick”

It’s impossible to go through all the weird shit this guy is saying. But it’s worth noting that there is more State Department type material, and it’s worth contrasting it with his previous materials.

Along with pushing this “Russian agents” theory, “NATO Nick” as they are calling him is now all of a sudden talking about “Russian aggression” against NATO.

Russian aggression against NATO…!

Here he is doing his zany conspiracy theory bit against Jackson Hinkle, who he says is a Russian agent because he has a Russian girlfriend.

The most notable thing about that is that he says there is “no difference” between Russia influencing our politics and Israel doing so. That is a truly incredible statement for a number of reasons, but surely, putting everything else aside (such as the fact Russia is not engaged in an organized influence campaign in America, and comparing Jackson Hinkle’s Twitter account to AIPAC and the $200 billion Miriam Adelson gave to Donald Trump is utterly nonsensical), the intent and effect of Russian influence would be much different than that of Israeli influence.

In that clip, he also claims Russian Foreign Affairs Minister Sergey Lavrov personally “tipped off” Hinkle to “investment opportunities.” As far as I can tell, there is literally no source for that anywhere. I used multiple AIs to attempt to find even a rumor of this posted on reddit or some other obscure forum, and none of them could find anything, with one noting: “Even in spaces like r/Destiny, r/NAFO, and r/KnowledgeFight, where Hinkle is frequently mocked or analyzed, there is no mention of a Lavrov-provided investment tip.” Fuentes seems to have made it up out of thin air, which is another one of his strategies. He usually cites “his sources” when inserting a completely fabricated claim. (It would be shocking to me if he had any sources at all, given that aside from being a ridiculous and totally unserious person, he is virtually impossible to deal with on a personal level due to a lack of a basic understanding of human social norms. Further, he constantly posts private messages from people he’d previously been cordial with or even worked with directly. I have documented that he publicly tried to blackmail me, threatening to reveal private information. [This is a felony, by the way. And for the record, the first time I heard this I demanded he release whatever this blackmail was, and instead he simply continued to make the threat. More very odd behavior.] He suggests many of these “sources” he claims to have are inside of the government, meaning statements to him would be “leaking,” which though a common practice, is in many contexts a felony that can carry up to a ten-year prison sentence.)

Note: I assume Fuentes is getting some of these weird talking points from handlers, and he just inserts them randomly without coherent structure. However, he also seems to get confused about what his handlers are telling him to say. Further, separately from whatever handlers are feeding him this disinformation, he appears to be a pathological liar. And then separate from that, it also appears that he creates conspiracy theories in his own mind, and the lack of pushback from his “mugu” followers reinforces the idea that he can keep creating goofier and goofier theories. You can see above that on his own show, he said Candace is “definitely Russian,” stating it as a fact, but then when sitting across from someone looking a bit skeptical, he adds “it’s speculation” at the end. I’m including this as a side note because it really doesn’t matter why he spews out all of this convoluted and confounding nonsense, but it is obviously natural for people to try and understand how something like this happens. Further, it is worth noting that schizophrenia typically manifests in the early to mid-twenties. Fuentes is 27 now, whereas when he began using my material, he was in his early twenties. I am not asserting that he has clinical schizophrenia, as there are obviously other possible explanations for this (primarily, being fed disinformation by handlers and being too stupid to effectively communicate it), but a lot of the lines of thought he presents do line up with schizoid disorder. I also just want to take this opportunity to note that the idea that people take this man seriously, and I am now “debunking” something that could at least be confused for schizophrenic ramblings, is incredibly exhausting.

This anti-Russia narrative he is pushing is very new. He maintained a positive view of Russia, left over from when he was getting his entire script from me, up until earlier this year.

Here is Fuentes in June of this year talking about how, in the wake of the Ukraine drone striking Russia’s nuclear-capable bombers in Siberia, Russia would be justified in nuking the Ukraine.

That is definitely not exactly an anti-Russia take, three months before Kirk’s death. (Please enjoy his explanation of the way nuclear deterrence works. He has a lesser understanding of this issue than anyone who has taken International Relations 101 or like, read the Wikipedia page about Deterrence Theory. Again, he seems to believe he is a genius and he can just intuitively understand how everything in the world works. Of course, he is playing for an audience which, if he says something with enough confidence, will just accept it, so I guess it works out for everyone.)

Here’s Fuentes in March of this year, calling for the US to surrender the Ukraine to Russia:

Going back a bit, in January of last year, just going through all my talking points about how the US caused the war:

More basic, obvious stuff from early 2024:

Also worth noting is that he supports the US doing regime change in Venezuela to take their resources.

But don’t let that bother you, because while he supports regime change, he is also against it.

I think he said he supports it because the US should steal their resources, but he is also against it, because Marco Rubio is Cuban? Honestly, it is absurd to try to make sense of any of it. It’s whatever. But note that there is a definite pattern not only of changing his views back and forth, but of presenting multiple conflicting views in a very short timeframe, without explanation, indicating that he actually holds conflicting positions in his mind. (Again, one would certainly be inclined to consider mental illness in analyzing that behavior, with the other possible explanation, probably the only other possible explanation, being that he is too stupid to coherently convey narratives that his handlers have given him.) You saw an example of this above, where he said to Jackson Hinkle “you are going to prison” for saying Israel killed Charlie Kirk, tagged the FBI in a call to arrest Hinkle for his posts, called for the government to act against people who engaged in anti-Charlie speech after his death, then later claimed he didn’t want arrests or hate speech laws and never implied that, saying he was actually talking about mass censorship. Further, as noted above, he has claimed that Tucker Carlson is both a CIA agent and a Russian agent, claiming to hold both beliefs at the same time.

To be clear, everyone has a right to change their position on anything. I have very rarely changed my position on anything, but most people have. Sargon of Akkad comes to mind as an example of someone who has gone through a pretty significant transformation in his way of thinking about things over the years. However, whenever he would make a change in his mode of thought, in his presentation of his ideas, Sargon would spend many hours explaining why and how he changed his view.

Fuentes has made no attempt to explain how he went from cheering on Russia’s invasion of the Ukraine, from praising Russia as a Christian country fighting against the satanic Western empire, to arguing that Russia is engaged in a campaign of disinformation to discredit the FBI and that they are actually the aggressors in the conflict with NATO. So it is certainly a fair question to ask how many of these people who are going along with this, following Nick and changing their views to match his without any explanation, are even real people.

Note that mainstream MAGA has been very critical of Trump when he’s changed his position on H-1B visas, on the Epstein Files, on the Ukraine war, and so on. And Trump has done more than Fuentes to try to explain why he changed his positions.

Other Gobbledygook (Of a More Dangerous Sort)

Fuentes recently stirred controversy among morons after telling his followers to infiltrate the CIA. This clip went viral and actually did stir some discussion from real people, given the bizarre nature of the statements.

A recent article in WIRED described the Fuentes plan to “conquer America.”

There’s a lot you could say about this. Some of it would be very funny, I’m sure. I mean, like, you could point to the examples we have of his Elite Human Capital.

(Yes, posting that photo does feel a bit cruel. I understand that and feel bad about it.)

But there is a pretty obvious “bottom line” about the “we’re going to infiltrate the CIA” gibberish.

Here is his response to criticism of his plan:

That’s a Telegram post. He uses Telegram as his primary writing platform and encourages all his followers to follow him there. Telegram requires a phone number, and you have to install it on your phone so the app operator gets access to a unique device ID. The owner of Telegram, Pavel Durov, cooperates with the feds (from the US and many other governments) without publicly disclosed warrants. The CIA and really any intelligence agency could obviously get the list of Fuentes’ Telegram followers without that benefit, but they have that benefit.

Fuentes doesn’t even encourage his followers to somehow use op-sec when signing up to follow him on Telegram. It would be virtually impossible to do anyway. You could in theory buy an internet phone number with anonymous cryptocurrency, but you would still have to install the app on your phone, which would mean you could be identified even without the phone number.

Do you see where I’m going with this? Smell what I’m cooking?

Fuentes has created a situation where every federal law enforcement agency has a full list of all of his followers. He encourages people to sign up to multiple TG channels on all his socials. He also sells merch and takes donations with Visa cards.

He holds events at public venues, where people register with their real names. He holds these events at random hotels, which will almost certainly turn over video to the FBI without warrants, and use facial recognition to identify people (your facial recognition data is logged by the federal government when you get your driver’s license).

At an event last year, the venue he’d booked canceled on him, and so, after promising attendees anonymity, he took them all to a public rooftop bar where dozens of people filmed them and posted video on social media.

Serious political leader, by the way. Ready to infiltrate and take over the CIA.

There are dozens of different ways he’s made it possible for the FBI and literally every other intelligence agency on earth to collect full lists of all of his followers.

So obviously, none of his followers are ever going to get anywhere close to state power. They are all on FBI lists as “followers of a right-wing extremist telling his followers to infiltrate institutions of state power.”

What’s more, because Fuentes has framed himself as a “political dissident” with the goal of “reshaping America,” and formed a group based around this idea, if someone from that group attempted to join the CIA for the stated purpose of undermining and reshaping the organization and America, it’s not exactly difficult to imagine that they could be charged with sedition, a very serious felony potentially carrying a 20-year prison term. A lot of this stuff he says is goofy and potentially harmless, but setting up young men to completely destroy their lives is not a joke.

So, do you see how that is just like, retarded? And that only a retarded person would take that seriously, or consider the person saying it a serious person? He has talked about this “infiltration” stuff for years. It would have been very easy, if this was actually your plan, to encourage people to use operational security (op-sec) and ensure that the government doesn’t know who they are. Instead, it’s “show up to this IRL event, follow me on that app where you register with your phone number, and please send me money with your Visa card.”

He is saying “infiltrate the CIA.” Do you believe that he believes that the CIA doesn’t do background checks? Or does he believe the FBI doesn’t create lists of “extremists”? He would have to be very stupid to believe those things. But if he knows those things, and yet he is still saying “get on my right-wing Telegram channel to learn more about how to infiltrate the CIA,” then what exactly is going on?

There is a Lot More to Say (And Say It I Shall)

I mentioned in my last article that the reason I have been publishing less is that I have been working on a new project which will be a podcast, or perhaps more of a TV show. What I have realized is that my role should be analyzing this alternative media that has become the mainstream media. That is where I belong now. The best way I can communicate the truth of things is by showing you where these people are lying. Fuentes is the man of the hour, but all of these alternative media people are rats. I watch these shows, and the amount of lies is simply incredible. It’s virtually all video media, so I need to be on video, so I can show you these videos and break it all down.

I want to do this right. So I’m taking my time. The goal is to have the show put together on or before Valentine’s Day, which marks a year since I quit the daily news. I’m putting together a team. I don’t want to reveal too much, but it will be a weekly show, primarily focused on deconstructing media narratives. We will probably also do some kind of donation drive to help with the costs of the equipment. I’m not going to do that until everything else is ready to go, and we’ve worked out all the staffing details and so on.

What I plan to do is bring back the energy of the best days of the Daily Stormer, which were those years before Charlottesville, when it was fun. I’m really feeling this energy. I’ll have to learn to be on camera and so on. I’ve started filming myself, started working on my oration.

I don’t intend to stop writing. I will write less than I did, but more than I have been in the last few months. For the last few months, I’ve been focused on this project, and until it’s done, you can assume that the less I’m writing, the better it’s going. After we get going, I plan to write a long piece based on the show’s notes before we do the weekly stream, so there is a written accompaniment when I post the show that will include all of the sources I am using, and comments on the topics. Writing is a big part of how I think, so preparing for the show, I will write a kind of outline for the show, published alongside it.

Along with that, I will no doubt publish various other articles during the week.

Right now, I am writing a lot about the show, as I try to work out exactly what I want it to be. But aside from being classic Stormer type anti-media media, I know I want it to be fun. I know I want it to be a Saturday Night Parasocial Spectacular, where I get together with all of my parasocial friends and we drink and vape and talk shit together. But it’s also going to be very structured, and not a “live stream” or a “podcast” but a real show, with significant planning, not some “just chatting” slop with superchats.

I’ve been going in all different directions over the last nine months, working through what I want to do on the next leg of my career, and this is definitely it. And I am going to be very surprised if anyone is disappointed. Well. Without giving too much away, some people will be shocked and confused, particularly those who were not around for the pre-August, 2017 Stormer.

I know most of you are not checking the site very often anymore, because there hasn’t been much content. I am going to set up on Nostr, which is a new (or rather, newly working) uncensorable Twitter clone. We might try some other socials. But I think Nostr is going to be big, and it’s a good place to make our basecamp.

I keep getting frustrated that I didn’t think of this months ago so I could be up and running now for all this weird shit that is going on with these podcasts. Clearly, this article you have just read would have been a lot better as a video. But I needed the time. And I think it is very safe to assume that the weird shit is not going to stop, and we are going to have endless “alternative media” content to analyze.

The Troll Army will be reconstituted and it will be bigger and better and funnier than ever before.

If you are reading this, consider yourself conscripted.

This is the dawn of a new era. My blood is pumping like a machine gun just thinking about it.

“We hope everyone is innocent.” -🦇☭

Article updated to correct the publication date of the NYT piece on Fuentes.

]]> Stew Peters’ Beef with Lucas Gage Escalates as Peters Drops Diss Track https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/06/12/stew-peters-beef-with-lucas-gage-escalates-as-peters-drops-diss-track/ Thu, 12 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0000 EDITOR’S NOTE: The Daily Stormer Editorial Staff does not endorse the contents of this song or this article about it, we are simply posting it to push back against the censorship on Twitter and to start a conversation about whether the woke right would be better off if people in arguments wrote songs against each other instead of engaging in endless Twitter arguments.

Fokiss is back in the STUdio and he’s literally committing murder on the mic.

Stew Peters is a famous media personality who created the Solana token “JPROOF” to stop the Rothschild bankers. However, some do not know that before he took on this role, he was a successful rapper. As the JPROOF token has created some drama, Stew Peters has returned to his rap personality as “Fokiss” to drop a diss track against Lucas Gage who has accused him of doing a rug pull.

I do not have any interest in dipping into this drama. As far as I am aware, this “JPROOF” Sol token is in fact stopping the Rothschild bankers and will save America by ending the fed. Peters has given me no reason to doubt this, and a 70% drop is not proof of a rug pull, and could be a random event. It is also feasible that someone could do a rug pull against the Rothschild banksters. I’m not saying that’s what happened, but a scheme to stop the international banking cartel with a meme coin rug pull could be the black swan power play we’ve all been waiting for.

I also have no reason to judge Lucas Gage, who is a genuine guy I’ve known for like 15 years, and it is definitely frustrating to sell a meme coin at a $9,000 loss. I was rug pulled by Donald Trump and his rapidly aging pro-abortion wife. Though I pulled profits before getting rug pulled, it still did not feel great to lose a bunch of money, so if Lucas Gage and his wife (who is also involved in this situation for some reason) feel they got rug pulled by the Stew Crew, I feel for them.

So please, let’s be clear: I do not want to be involved in this drama. As far as I’m concerned, Peters and Gage are both upstanding members of the woke right movement, and whatever beef they’ve got is between them. Period. I want no involvement at all.

All I want to do is share Stew “Fokiss” Peters’ diss track, because it is being censored on Twitter, and I believe in free speech. (No matter how offensive to my gentle sensibilities your diss track is, I will die for your right to drop it.) It keeps being banned by Elon Musk, who has also accused both Stew Peters and Lucas Gage of being in the Epstein files. He has since deleted those tweets, but continues to suppress the Fokiss diss track. I don’t think he’s siding with Gage (though I have seen photos of Gage and Ian Miles Cheong having cocktails in Dubai), but he just wants to shut down the debate on the woke right so he can push his own narrative.

Regardless of which side of the hill you choose to drown on, the song is decent and even if it isn’t, the people have a right to make up their own mind about Fokiss and his disses.

The track is titled “Goomba” (you’ll see why).

I claim no rights to this song, with any copyright held by Fokiss and Stew Peters. Stew has said you can feel free to try to upload it again on Twitter. Because for real, this drama is just silly, but we need to honor freedom of speech and free expression.

I want to say that as far as I know, Lucas has a great wife and a happy family. Stew shouldn’t be saying these things about his wife, but to be honest, Gage shouldn’t be doing anti-Stew videos with his wife if he doesn’t want her involved. But this is just the rap game, you know? People say mean things, then sometimes they show love after they get their emotions out. I hope after the heat dies down, Gage and Peters get together and launch another Sol token to do more damage to the Rothschilds and end the fed once and for all.

We’re taking odds on whether or not Lucas Gage will try to match Fokiss’ flow. By releasing this diss track, Stew has pretty much killed the beef, because everyone is now talking about the song rather than whatever the drama is (which I honestly still don’t really understand beyond a few tweets I saw and what I gleaned from the lyrics of this diss track).

If Gage drops a counter-diss, things could get real interesting, and it’s possible we could set up a real life rap battle, maybe in Abu Dhabi where the Jews won’t shut us down.

If all drama took the form of music, we’d be in a lot better place in the woke right movement. If I had Stew’s rhyming skills, I’d have saved myself the trouble of writing tens of thousands of words against my many enemies on the woke right. Sadly, as shameful as it is for me to admit as a proud white man, I can’t write a rap to save my life.

I’m alright with beats though, and I can definitely proof read some rhymes that Lucas draws up. Even though I have no cat in this fight, I might step in and try to help Lucas put out a counter-diss, because although the song is fire, Fokiss went too hard, and I tend to always root for the underdog. Lucas is the underdog now that this track is out there, and he needs to get his feelings about the rug pull out there in rap format, and there is a lot of material to work with, especially since Fokiss’ early work is not great, and Gage can easily accuse him of using autotune.

Part of the problem is that Fokiss preempted Gage’s diss material by talking about crashing 4 quads and beating his wife. It was a smart move as a rapper to be like “yeah, I did that shit.” Now Gage is going to have to look for other angles to hit him on. Also frankly, Gage is on the back foot since he is doing videos with his wife, which is maybe a sort of weird optics choice. But I can help spin that.

I’m talking myself into it now. I’m willing to get together with Gage to do a response to Goomba. I know all’s fair in war and rap battles, but Fokiss got real nasty about Gage and his financial situation and his wife’s opinions. Again, if I was Gage, I wouldn’t have put my wife’s opinions in my internet beef, but what’s done is done and we’re just gonna have to spin that.

“Fokiss you a bitch so I send my bitch to nag you because she on your level, neither of you is useful with a shovel because it takes a real man to dig a hole, like the hole you dug with your rug pull.” Or maybe “my wife is a knife, I sent her at your jugular, cuz she did that thug life while you was bounty hunting innocent whites.” Maybe something like that. I’m just spitballing here. Again, I’m not a rap master, but I want to help to defend Gage, even though I don’t have a possum in this cockpit, because I support the underdog.

But then again if Fokiss hit me with some of that JPROOF coin, I might join his team because I need the cash to pay for my seizure medication. And it’s nice to have principles and support the underdog until you’re flopping on the floor and foaming at the mouth and your stupid wife thinks a metal spoon is just as good as a wooden spoon and now your teeth look like Shane MacGowan’s.

But seriously, I’m not going to choose sides in this fight, I’m staying out of it, I love both these guys who are truly honorable members of the Aryan race who have done so much to save our people from the Jews by fighting tooth and nail against the banksters and helping the Palestinians.

I just try to be a good guy and help everyone, but I’m just honest, if Stew Crew pays for my seizure medication I’ll help him with his rug pull against the Rothschilds so we can liberate the white race from the slavery of the banksters and end the fed once and for all using Sol token meme coins.

I just gotta keep it real and tell you that my wife thinks “wooden spoon” means “stainless steel egg beater,” and I’m trying to write this book about Palantir and there is foam all over my keyboard and I have to drink enough whisky to make it cool that my teeth look like Shane MacGowan’s (and that is a lot of whisky).

I just truly hope Gage and Stew can work together to bring down the Rothschilds once and for all using Sol meme token rug pulls.

]]> Stew Peters’ Beef with Lukas Gage Escalates as Peters Drops Dis Track https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/06/12/stew-peters-beef-with-lukas-gage-escalates-as-peters-drops-dis-track/ Thu, 12 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0000 EDITOR’S NOTE: The Daily Stormer Editorial Staff does not endorse the contents of this song or this article about it, we are simply posting it to push back against the censorship on Twitter and to start a conversation about whether the woke right would be better off if people in arguments wrote songs against each other instead of engaging in endless Twitter arguments.

Fokiss is back in the STUdio and he’s literally committing murder on the mic.

Stew Peters is a famous media personality who created the Solona token “JPROOF” to stop the Rothschild bankers. However, some do not know that before he took on this role, he was a successful rapper. As the JPROOF token has created some drama, Stew Peters has returned to his rap personality as “Fokiss” to drop a dis track against Lukas Gage who has accused him of doing a rug pull.

I do not have any interest in dipping into this drama. As far as I am aware, this “JPROOF” Sol token is in fact stopping the Rothschild bankers and will save America by ending the fed. Peters has given me no reason to doubt this, and a 70% drop is not proof of a rug pull, and could be a random event. It is also feasible that someone could do a rug pull against the Rothschild banksters. I’m not saying that’s what happened, but a scheme to stop the international banking cartel with a meme coin rug pull could be the black swan power play we’ve all been waiting for.

I also have no reason to judge Lukas Gage, who is a genuine guy I’ve known for like 15 years, and it is definitely frustrating to sell a meme coin at a $9000 loss. I was rug pulled by Donald Trump and his rapidly aging pro-abortion wife. Though I pulled profits before getting rug pulled, it still did not feel great to lose a bunch of money, so if Lukas Gage and his wife (who is also involved in this situation for some reason) feels they got rug pulled by the Stew Crew, I feel for them.

So please, let’s be clear: I do not want involved in this drama. As far as I’m concerned, Peters and Gage are both upstanding members of the woke right movement, and whatever beef they’ve got is between them. Period. I want no involvement at all.

All I want to do is share Stew “Fokiss” Peters’ dis track, because it is being censored on Twitter, and I believe in free speech. (No matter how offensive to my gentle sensibilities your dis track is, I will die for your right to drop it.) It keeps being banned by Elon Musk, who has also accused both Stew Peters and Lukas Gage of being in the Epstein files. He has since deleted those tweets, but continues to suppress the Fokiss dis track. I don’t think he’s siding with Gage (though I have seen photos of Gage and Ian Michaels Chong having cocktails in Dubai), but he just wants to shut down the debate on the woke right so he can push his own narrative.

Regardless of which side of the hill you choose to drown on, the song is decent and even if it isn’t, the people have a right to make up their own mind about Fokiss and his disses.

The track is titled “Goomba” (you’ll see why).

I claim no rights to this song, with any copyright held by Fokiss and Stew Peters. Stew has said you can feel free to try to upload it again on Twitter. Because for real, this drama is just silly, but we need to honor freedom of speech and free expression.

I want to say that as far as I know, Lukas has a great wife and a happy family. Stew shouldn’t be saying these things about his wife, but to be honest, Gage shouldn’t be doing anti-Stew videos with his wife if he doesn’t want her involved. But this is just the rap game, you know? People say mean things, then sometimes they show love after they get their emotions out. I hope after the heat dies down, Gage and Peters get together and launch another Sol token to do more damage to the Rothschilds and end the fed once and for all.

We’re taking odds on whether or not Lukas Gage will try to match Fokiss’ flow. By releasing this dis track, Stew has pretty much killed the beef, because everyone is now talking about the song rather than whatever the drama is (which I honestly still don’t really understand beyond a few tweets I saw and what I gleaned from the lyrics of this dis track).

If Gage drops a counter-dis, things could get real interesting, and it’s possible we could set up a real life rap battle, maybe in Abu Dhabi where the Jews won’t shut us down.

If all drama took the form of music, we’d be in a lot better place in the woke right movement. If I had Stew’s rhyming skills, I’d have saved myself the trouble of writing tens of thousands of words against my many enemies on the woke right. Sadly, as shameful as it is for me to admit as a proud white man, I can’t write a rap to save my life.

I’m alright with beats though, and I can definitely proof read some rhymes that Lukas draws up. Even though I have no cat in this fight, I might step in and try to help Lukas put out a counter-dis, because although the song is fire, Fokiss went too hard, and I tend to always root for the underdog. Lukas is the underdog now that this track is out there, and he needs to get his feelings about the rug pull out there in rap format, and there is a lot of material to work with, especially since Fokiss’ early work is not great, and Gage can easily accuse him of using autotune.

Part of the problem is that Fokiss preempted Gage’s dis material by talking about crashing 4 quads and beating his wife. It was a smart move as a rapper to be like “yeah, I did that shit.” Now Gage is going to have to look for other angles to hit him on. Also frankly, Gage is on the back foot since he is doing videos with his wife, which is maybe a sort of weird optics choice. But I can help spin that.

I’m talking myself into it now. I’m willing to get together with Gage to do a response to Goomba. I know all’s fair in war and rap battles, but Fokiss got real nasty about Gage and his financial situation and his wife’s opinions. Again, if I was Gage, I wouldn’t have put my wife’s opinions in my internet beef, but what’s done is done and we’re just gonna have to spin that.

“Fokiss you a bitch so I send my bitch to nag you because she on your level, neither of you is useful with a shovel because it takes a real man to dig a hole, like the hole you dug with your rug pull.” Or maybe “my wife is a knife, I sent her at your jugular, cuz she did that thug life while you was bounty hunting innocent whites.” Maybe something like that. I’m just spitballing here. Again, I’m not a rap master, but I want to help to defend Gage, even though I don’t have a possum in this cockpit, because I support the underdog.

But then again if Fokiss hit me with some of that JPROOF coin, I might join his team because I need the cash to pay for my seizure medication. And it’s nice to have principles and support the underdog until you’re flopping on the floor and foaming at the mouth and your stupid wife thinks a metal spoon is just as good as a wooden spoon and now your teeth look like Shane McGowan.

But seriously, I’m not going to choose sides in this fight, I’m staying out of it, I love both these guys who are truly honorable members of the Aryan race who have done so much to save our people from the Jews by fighting tooth and nail against the banksters and helping the Palestinians.

I just try to be a good guy and help everyone, but I’m just honest, if Stew Crew pays for my seizure medication I’ll help him with his rug pull against the Rothschilds so we can liberate the white race from the slavery of the banksters and end the fed once and for all using Sol token meme coins.

I just gotta keep it real and tell you that my wife thinks “wooden spoon” means “stainless steel egg beater,” and I’m trying to write this book about Palantir and there is foam all over my keyboard and I have to drink enough whisky to make it cool that my teeth look like Shame McGowan’s (and that is a lot of whisky).

I just truly hope Gage and Stew can work together to bring down the Rothschilds once and for all using Sol meme token rug pulls.

]]> Fat Bitch and Gaming Cheat Musk Suspends Another RT-Linked Account for Gaza Reportage https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/02/12/fat-bitch-and-gaming-cheat-musk-suspends-another-rt-linked-account-for-gaza-reportage/ Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Previously: Free Speech Fraud Elon Musk Bans RT India

Elon Musk lied to the world about being one of the top ten Path of Exile 2 players in the world.

But verily, it is the truth that he is one of the top ten censors in the world.

Just like always, I told you people: if he’s censoring me, it’s only a matter of time before he censors everyone else of any relevance.

RT:

Elon Musk’s social media platform X has suspended the account of Going Underground, an independent UAE-based TV production that airs on RT and covers geopolitics and current affairs. According to the notice shared with RT on Tuesday, the suspension came after the program’s account was reviewed by a human moderator and allegedly found to have violated the platform’s rules.

“@GUnderground_TV has been suspended for violating X rules… specifically our rules against inauthentic behavior. You may not use our services to engage in inauthentic behavior that undermines the integrity of X,” the notice stated, without further explanation.

“Inauthentic behavior.”

That’s not Orwellian at all.

(In case you hadn’t noticed, I’m being sarcastic.)

According to Going Underground, the suspension was followed by a complaint about the account reposting a clip from year-old RT report on Gaza. The report revolved around the enclave’s rich oil and gas resources, and the post offered these as the major reasons why US President Donald Trump has recently shown interest in taking control over Gaza.

In a notice also shared with RT, X informed Going Underground that it will be withholding the reported content in the EU “specifically for the following legal grounds: Scope of Platform Service,” apparently citing the EU Digital Services Act, which regulates digital data within the bloc. RT broadcasts have officially been banned in the EU since 2022.

Yeah, I mean.

Elon censored Asmongold for talking about how he was cheating at video games.

Obviously, he’s going to censor anything he views as damaging to the Trump administration that he views himself as running.

You’re going to be looking at a situation even worse than what was happening when he bought it, and this fat pussy is still going to go around talking about how he’s the king of free speech.

Because he lets you say “there are only two genders.”

]]> Free Speech Fraud Elon Musk Bans RT India https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/02/11/free-speech-fraud-elon-musk-bans-rt-india/ Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000
Access denied sign on laptop screen. Hand from device showing user does not have permission to file, system refuses password and entry to computer data, error with red signal. Vector illustration

One would have to assume this is the beginning of an Elon Musk program to ban all foreign media which questions the narrative of the US government.

The censorship on Twitter is already worse than it ever was under Jack Dorsey. It hasn’t gotten quite as bad as it was under that Indian freak who became the CEO, but it’s definitely going in that direction.

RT:

Social media platform X has suspended the English-language account belonging to RT’s India branch. The suspension notice sent to RT India on Tuesday stated that the account had allegedly violated the platform’s rules.

According to a statement posted on RT’s main X account, RT India has been accused of unlawfully “impersonating” RT, a claim the channel has denied. The post was accompanied by a screenshot of the suspension notice, in which X accused RT India of “violating X rules against inauthentic accounts” and informed the branch that it “may not misappropriate the identity of individuals, groups, or organizations or use a fake identity to deceive others.”

The channel criticized the platform for the suspension, confirming that “our sister channel @RT_India_news… are very much not impersonating anyone” and expressing hope the situation is “a simple misunderstanding.” In a later post, RT announced that “sadly, we have not yet got a response to rectify this obviously unjust situation with RT India” from X moderators and asked the platform’s owner, Elon Musk, to intervene.

The most infuriating thing is that Elon continues to go around talking about how it’s a free speech website.

Do you know that not only am I banned, but it is banned to even link to the Daily Stormer?

And there is a sum total of zero transparency. Elon will not explain why I am banned, or why links to the site are banned.

What rule did I break?

When I was on the site for those first few months that Elon owned the site, my account was boring as hell. I was not saying anything even remotely interesting, let alone doing “hate speech.” And he said he was going to allow hate speech.

Twitter is a total scam, and everything on it is part of the scam. As soon as anyone is effective, they get banned.

RT is pretty benign, and definitely not “hate speech,” but they oppose the mainstream narrative, including on issues that matter to Trump, like Palestine.

There is going to be another big crackdown on Twitter, for sure.

But hey – at least they’ll let you say “there are only two genders,” right? That’s what’s most important.

]]> Kanye Attacks Translor Swift Before Elon Bans Him https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/02/10/kanye-attacks-translor-swift-before-elon-bans-him/ Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Kanye’s been going hard against Jews on Twitter for days now. Lots of great stuff, several things I didn’t really understand at all. He defended Puff Daddy, and I can’t tell if that was a joke or not. Sort of funny either way.

Elon finally kicked him off, again, because Elon believes in total free speech but he will not tolerate hate speech against the precious chosen ones. Everything else is free speech. Unless you complain about his H-1B program or the fact that he cheats at video games. But everything else is pure free speech to the core.

Apparently, before the ban, Elon was begging Kanye to stop insulting our most precious ones, the sweet Jews, who have never done anything wrong to anyone and are hated for literally no reason.

This was Kanye’s second to last tweet:

As you can see, he was in communication with Elon and asking him not to ban him. This was his last tweet:

Elon had been restricting his tweets every time he said anything about Jews.

Elon Musk is a total fraud.

All of that stuff Kanye wrote about Jews would have been fine in 2015 when Jack Dorsey still ran the site.

Elon vowed free speech, and the fat piece of shit still has the nerve to post about how it’s a free speech site.

What specifically are you allowed to say on Twitter that you’re not allowed to say on Facebook?

Twitter is “free speech” in the same way that Taylor Swift is “a woman.”

The whole thing is so demoralizing. Kanye is one of the biggest celebrities in the world, and he can’t get a platform for free speech. What chance do the rest of us have? And how is it sustainable to have a society that is run by Jews, totally dominated by them, where it is not only effectively illegal to criticize Jews, but to even point out that they control everything?

Historically, it was usually illegal to criticize the king in a monarchy, but imagine if it was illegal to say that the king was the king. Imagine if you said “the king is the king, you can see him in that palace right there, he’s on a throne, he makes all the decisions about how the government is run” and you were arrested for that, with the king issuing a statement from his palace that he is not the king and does not live in the palace.

It’s maddening, and you can say Kanye is a bit crazy, but anyone could go crazy dealing with this reality, which is why most people will say “yeah, I can see him in the palace, wearing that crown, sitting on that throne, but he’s not the king and he’s not in that palace.”

Is it possible for people to be threatened into believing the opposite of reality indefinitely? Can this go on for thousands of years? Or does it just totally fall apart at some point?

Whatever you think of Kanye, creating noise about the Jews, and forcing people to look at this issue, is always a good thing.

]]> Sam Hyde Releases Self-Help Video, Following Up Viral Anti-Elon Video https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/01/23/sam-hyde-releases-self-help-video-following-up-viral-anti-elon-video/ Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Sam Hyde has released a new self-help video which is something of a follow-up on his video criticizing Elon Musk’s H-1B scheme.

On the Elon video, he posted a phone number for people to leave voice mails, and he plays several of those and responds to them with sold self-help advice.

Sam is one of my favorite people and I hope he keeps up this routine of public videos. I think he was still doing subscription stuff, but I didn’t see any of it because I am not allowed to use Visa/MasterCard for the rest of my life because I made fun of an obese woman who had a heart attack during a traffic accident.

As you can see above, the video is age-gated on YouTube, which is a soft (hard?) form of censorship that YouTube uses to stifle popular videos they disagree with. The video has no inappropriate content.

But you can watch it on Twitter.

Sam will probably be banned from Twitter again soon enough. I’m sure Elon didn’t think much of his viral criticism.

When Elon admitted to being a total Fraud Gamer in a DM chat with some random fat guy, he also admitted that he holds grudges against people who criticize him, even if their criticism is all true. He said he has no desire to work with Asmongold or Quin69 because they “trashed him,” despite the fact that everything they said was true, and Elon now admits that they were right in claiming he is a total fraud.

Laura Loomer got her blue check back, but she suggested (without directly stating it) that she had to personally call Trump and tell Trump to tell Elon to give her back her check. Others that lost their checks for criticizing Elon’s planned “Shit Tsunami” from India did not get their checks back.

I think everyone is going to get banned or at least censored on Twitter. Elon banned people for the lowest level things before the administration even started, so what is he going to do when shit gets hot?

I was banned for masturbating to the wrong image of a semi-nude woman two years ago, with no option for appeal.

There is certainly a lot of talk about freedom of speech, but right now Sam Hyde is soft-banned on YouTube and while he is on Twitter, no one really has any confidence he’ll be there long-term. And Sam is pretty mainstream. He had a show on the Cartoon Network and he did that big event with Keemstar.

So what of the rest of us?

I understand I’m the most extreme case of censorship in the world ever, and I don’t really even expect to get unbanned from anything – at least not until the US Empire collapses – but the freedom situation is not good at all and I don’t see Trump actually doing anything to address it.

Based on his plan for the US government to buy TikTok, if that actually happens, it would be illegal for them to censor it. So, maybe that’s a way out. I sort of doubt it, but okay.

I don’t agree with Sam about not beating your kids. This “peaceful parenting” horseshit has been used since the boomers, and if you look around, it sure as hell does not look like it worked very well. You should beat your kids if they deserve it and you should also make them butcher animals.

If you have a chance, take them to a public execution like in Game of Thrones.

Note that this beheading video is not age-gated on YouTube.

I don’t think I need to explain that age-gating is always censorship, as everyone knows that all of this other stuff is public on the platform. But why is Sam Hyde even ostensibly age-gated? Because he said the f-word (“fuck” not “faggot”)? There are billions of videos on YouTube that say “fuck” and I think at this point we all understand that this word is no longer “obscenity” because it is so widely used in society.

The video is totally worth watching.

]]> EU Forcing Social Media Companies to Censor “Hate Speech” https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/01/22/eu-forcing-social-media-companies-to-censor-hate-speech/ Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Illegal hate speech is a systemic threat for democracy & fundamental rights.

The new ‘Code of conduct on countering illegal hate speech online +’ integrated into the DSA is crucial to strengthen how online platforms deal with illegal hate speech content.

More ↓ @EU_Justice

— Digital EU 🇪🇺 (@DigitalEU) January 20, 2025

The US could easily put pressure on Europe and force them to accept American standards for freedom of speech.

It would be very easy.

The only reason the EU is so strict about speech is because the US pressured them in the first place.

Reuters:

Meta’s Facebook, Elon Musk’s X, Google’s YouTube and other tech companies have agreed to do more to tackle online hate speech under an updated code of conduct that will now be integrated into EU tech rules, the European Commission said on Monday.

Other signatories to the voluntary code set up in May 2016 are Dailymotion, Instagram, Jeuxvideo.com, LinkedIn, Microsoft hosted consumer services, Snapchat, Rakuten Viber, TikTok and Twitch.

“In Europe there is no place for illegal hate, either offline or online. I welcome the stakeholders’ commitment to a strengthened Code of conduct under the Digital Services Act (DSA),” EU tech commissioner Henna Virkkunen said in a statement.

…

Under the revised code, the companies pledged to allow not-for-profit or public entities with expertise on illegal hate speech to monitor how they review hate speech notices, and to assess at least two thirds of these notices received from them within 24 hours.

More meaningful than banning trannies and DEI (which were already on their way out) would be if the Trump Administration forced the EU to respect American freedom of speech laws.

That’s probably not totally beyond the scope of things Trump would be willing to do. People would still get arrested in Europe for speech, of course, but he could prevent the EU from being able to fine American companies for allowing free speech.

]]> With TikTok Ban Impending, US Users are Flooding Chinese App Rednote https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/01/17/with-tiktok-ban-impending-us-users-are-flooding-chinese-app-rednote/ Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000

This really highlights the problem.

The reason people use TikTok is because Chinese products are better than American products. When it comes to social media, the apps are designed better and they have more freedom of speech.

The US is attempting to ban one Chinese app, so another Chinese app becomes the number one download.

No one is migrating from TikTok to Twitter, where they will just get censored for calling out Elon Musk’s race replacement agenda and gamer fraud.

NPR:

With the clock ticking on a potential TikTok ban in the U.S., scores of Americans are flocking to a surprising alternative: a popular Chinese social media platform called Xiaohongshu, or RedNote in English.

The Supreme Court appears unlikely to block a law that requires TikTok to either be divested from its China-based parent company, ByteDance, or shut down in the U.S. on Jan. 19. The law stems from concerns about the Chinese government accessing Americans’ data.

That’s got many of the viral video app’s 170 million U.S.-based users preemptively looking for somewhere else to go. And RedNote seems to be the platform of choice.

The start of this week saw a dramatic uptick in Google searches and social media posts about RedNote, as well as its surge to the top spot of the “free apps” chart on Apple’s app store. The market intelligence firm Sensor Tower told NPR that its data indicates RedNote is also the top-ranked social app on the Google Play store on Wednesday — a big jump from #162, where it stood this time last year.

A person close to RedNote told Reuters that more than 700,000 new users joined in just two days. The New York Times reported that more than 100,000 people joined a live group chat hosted by a user named TikTok Refugee Club on Tuesday.

Many of these American newcomers are calling themselves TikTok refugees, a term that’s proliferating across the app in hashtags, comment sections and live chats. And the app’s Chinese users appear to be welcoming them with open arms, asking for cat photos and help with their English homework.

The US government is a criminal cartel. They have no right to ban TikTok. It’s an attack on the basic freedom of speech.

But these people are all retarded.

They do not understand that the US is a failed state, while China is the clearly superior civilization.

Look at this:

These people will claim that it is better to have homeless people shitting on the street. If they ever admit that America is not the pinnacle of civilization, they will claim India is.

India!

It’s a big delusional joke, the entire American elite, and it’s all going to come crashing down.

It is going to be the funniest thing ever if they do actually ban TikTok (it’s still not clear if they’re going to) and then in a matter of days a different Chinese app becomes number one.

Rednote has not even started a marketing campaign in English. It’s not even called “Rednote,” people are just calling it that because they can’t pronounce “Xiaohongshu” and the direct translation, “Little Red Book” is too cumbersome in English.

]]> The SEC is Suing Elon Musk Again https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/01/15/the-sec-is-suing-elon-musk-again/ Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Elon Musk is simply a criminal.

Obviously, you see him posting racist memes, and you think “well, of course the government is going after him!”

However, it is clear now that this is all part of his plan. He is committing all of these obvious crimes, then posting racist memes so he can claim the government is persecuting him for political reasons. He is obviously no more of a real racist than he is a real gamer. He wants to replace all white people with Indian filth.

The Fraud Gamer Scandal, which I am now calling #Elongate (because #Gamergate was already taken and #Fraudgamergate is too cumbersome), is the absolute model of all of Elon’s behavior. He is a fraud. He’s a fake gamer, a fake genius, a fake racist. His “full self-driving” is fake. His “free speech platform” is fake.

He’s a fraud and I don’t have to be an SEC respecter to realize that he is definitely committing crimes.

AP:

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has sued billionaire Elon Musk, saying he failed to disclose his ownership of Twitter stock in a timely manner in early 2022, before buying the social media site.

As a result, the SEC alleges, Musk was able to underpay “by at least $150 million” for shares he bought after he should have disclosed his ownership of more than 5% of Twitter’s shares. Musk bought Twitter in October 2022 and later renamed it X.

He renamed it what?

X? Just the letter “X”?

That is fucking retarded.

What kind of moron would pay tens of billions of dollars for a brand and then change the name?

Musk started amassing Twitter shares in early 2022, and by March of that year, he owned more than 5%. At this point, the complaint says, he was required by law to disclose his ownership, but he failed to do so until April 4, 11 days after the report was due.

Musk’s lawyer, Alex Spiro, said in a statement that the lawsuit “is an admission by the SEC that they cannot bring an actual case” since Musk has “done nothing wrong.” He called the lawsuit a “sham.”

Oh yes, Jew lawyer.

I’m sure Elon has done nothing wrong in this case, even though everything else he does is wrong.

He is a fraud gamer.

He is a free speech fraud, removing more blue checks than the previous Twitter administration ever did.

He is also a fraud racist, constantly posting racist memes and claiming to support racism while plotting to replace all whites with the worst race of all, Indians.

But now that he’s bought the Trump administration, he won’t be prosecuted for anything. Trump has carte blanche to do whatever because he’s the Defender of Israel. He can prevent Musk from being prosecuted for all of these scams.

Elon is not even being forced to stop calling his fake self-driving “Full Self-Driving.” It’s been ruled that it is legal to call it that and then just say in fine print “this is not actually full self-driving.” He goes around making statements saying you don’t have to hold the wheel, then people die and he says “well, you should have read the fine print that says you have to hold the wheel.”

The man is a menace.

]]>