The thesis is total travel ban.

Antithesis is no travel ban.

Synthesis is brown people can flood white countries and everyone else is locked in their house indefinitely.

The Guardian:

The Omicron coronavirus variant is “already everywhere” and travel bans will not stop its spread, the World Health Organization’s top Europe official has said, as the archbishop of Canterbury called for the scrapping of a “travel apartheid”.

As mounting numbers of cases are detected and evidence suggests the Omicron variant transmits faster than Delta, 43 countries in the European region have imposed travel restrictions.

But Dr Hans Kluge, the WHO’s regional director for Europe, said bans on incoming flights did not work and were too late “because Omicron is already everywhere”. “Omicron is in sight and on the rise and we are right to be concerned and cautious,” he said. At the same time, he added, vaccines, masks, ventilation and treatments were the best way to curb coronavirus – not travel restrictions.

…

Kluge said the evidence so far on Omicron was preliminary and there was no definitive evidence on how well vaccines would protect people. “It has yet to be seen how and whether the latest Covid-19 variant of concern, Omicron, will be more transmissible and more severe,” he said.

He said there were “five pandemic stabilisers to keep mortality down”. They were increasing vaccination rates; administering boosters to the most vulnerable; doubling mask-wearing rates indoors; ventilating crowded spaces; and adopting “rigorous therapeutic protocols for severe cases”.

Kluge said there was a need to avoid both school closures and home learning. He also said that, as school holidays approached, “we must acknowledge that children contaminate their parents and grandparents at home, with a 10-times increased risk for these adults to develop severe disease, be hospitalised or die when non-vaccinated”.

He said: “The use of masks and ventilation, and regular testing, should be a standard at all primary schools and vaccinating children should be discussed and considered nationally, as part of school protection measures.

“Vaccination of younger children not only reduces their role in Covid-19 transmission but also protects them from paediatric severity, whether associated with long Covid or multi-system inflammatory syndromes.”

Kluge also said vaccines should only be mandated at a population level as a last resort, adding that whatever measures countries were taking against Delta would also provide benefit against Omicron.

Yeah, people should have freedom of choice until they refuse to choose what the government is coercing them to choose.

Then they have to be forced to conform to the will of the government.

Simple as.

If there’s one thing all Americans can agree on, it’s that we need a whole helluva lot more Nigerians in America. We all know that our prosperity as a nation is tied to the number of Nigerians living in our nation. This is basic math: the more Nigerians, the better your country, the fewer Nigerians, the worse.

But there is one single American who disagrees: the racist bigot Donald Trump.

He must be stopped.

Fox News:

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was one of a number of top Democrats to rip into President Trump’s decision to expand the travel ban to include six more countries on Friday — with Pelosi describing it as “discrimination disguised as policy.”

“The Trump administration’s expansion of its outrageous, un-American travel ban threatens our security, our values and the rule of law,” she said in a statement. “The sweeping rule, barring more than 350 million individuals from predominantly African nations from traveling to the United States, is discrimination disguised as policy.”

The Trump administration is expanding restrictions to include Burma, Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Nigeria, Tanzania and Sudan. Those are added to the current seven countries already included in the ban: Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela and Yemen.

The initial ban was branded by critics as a “Muslim ban,” noting that President Trump had promised such a ban during his campaign and that the initial countries (which did not include North Korea and Venezuela, but did include Chad) were Muslim-majority countries.

But after multiple court challenges, the Supreme Court upheld its constitutionality in 2018.

For Burma, Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan and Nigeria, the restrictions will apply to immigrant visas — for those seeking to live or work in the U.S. permanently. For Sudan and Tanzania, the restrictions are being placed on diversity visas — that come from the controversial diversity lottery program that grants visas to prospective immigrants randomly each year.

Good Lord.

Eritrea!

The Sudan, even!

We need more of these people here, and we need them here quickly. We need them to permanently reside among us, or we are simply doomed.

There is no future for America unless it has an extreme permanent presence of Nigerians, Eritreans and the Sudanese.

Only a man blinded by hatred could ever fail to recognize the necessity of these blacks.

It’s ridiculous this even needed to go to the SCOTUS.

NEWSER:

President Donald Trump appears likely to win his travel ban case at the Supreme Court, the AP reports. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Anthony Kennedy both signaled support for the travel policy in arguments Wednesday at the high court. The ban’s challengers almost certainly need one of those two justices if the court is to strike down the ban on travelers from several mostly Muslim countries. Justice Sonia Sotomayor was the most aggressive questioner of Solicitor General Noel Francisco in his defense of the Trump policy, and the three other liberal justices also raised questions about it. The justices voted in December to allow the policy to take full effect pending their full consideration. Wednesday was the first time they took it up in open court. The Trump administration is asking the court to reverse lower court rulings that would strike down the ban.

Trump has the power to just ban people from coming into America. Every president has had that power. It’s an issue of national security, and the president has absolute power in that regard.

It shouldn’t even be possible for some crappy little islands to try and delay him doing that for as long as they can.

The fact we’re having the discussion at all is simply proof of the bizarre state of judicial tyranny this country is under.

At least we now control the SCOTUS – sort of – so that some of this stuff can get worked out.

Another chink is involved this time as well? What’s with these chinks?

For most judges, the prospect of being over-ruled by a higher court is profoundly unsettling. In the field of law, being over-ruled on a decision is a symptom of incompetence, either because of bias or ignorance of the law, and thus can be a blow to a judge’s reputation and career.

But the judges of the ninth circuit of appeals don’t fit the mold. According to the American bar association, 80% of their decisions are reversed on appeal. But they don’t care – they know better.

Tfw the American bar calls you out as a “rogue court.”

These people are clowns pushing a liberal political agenda, and have no concern about the actual law or constitution. If something gives them bad feels, then it must be somehow illegal, right?

And so predictably, even after the supreme court ruled earlier this month that Trump’s travel ban could be put into practice (strongly implying that they saw no immediate legal issue with it), the ninth circuit comes out with their own ruling against it.

New York Times:

A federal appeals court ruled Friday against President Trump’s latest travel ban, saying that it “exceeds the scope of his delegated authority,” but that it was ultimately for the Supreme Court to decide.

A three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Seattle affirmed the decision of a federal judge in Hawaii who ruled on Oct. 17 that the order was unlawful on statutory grounds.

The ruling on Friday was a procedural but important step. This month, the Supreme Court allowed the ban — the third version issued by the Trump administration — to take effect for now, and encouraged the appeals courts to rule on the case, a sign that it intended to take up the matter. The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is considering a similar ruling out of Maryland.

Wew, these retards should learn to take a hint.

The supreme court was like, “we’re blocking your blocking – please make your stupid ruling quickly so we can then reverse that too.” And so they did.

And now the media is somehow spinning this as a victory for them?

Neal Katyal, who argued the case before the Ninth Circuit court for the state of Hawaii, hailed the decision. “We are very pleased the Court of Appeals recognized that the president’s latest travel ban is flatly illegal,” he said, “and that his order defies the law Congress has laid down.”

Lauren Ehrsam, a spokeswoman for the Justice Department, said the Trump administration was “pleased” that the Supreme Court had already allowed the government to carry out the order.

“We continue to believe that the order should be allowed to take effect in its entirety,” she said.

Yeah.

This ruling has no practical effect – the supreme court has already said the the travel ban can be put into practice regardless of these stupid judiciary blocks. This is all just grandstanding meant to gaslight Trump’s base into feeling like they lost something, while in fact nothing at all is happening.

The Supreme Court asked this month that both the Ninth and Fourth Circuit courts rule expeditiously to enable it to take up the case. It will likely wait on the Fourth Circuit opinion before it decides whether it will hear the appeal and “finally decide to resolve this issue,” said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond.

Once these bugmen judges are done with their cute little rulings, the Supreme Court can come in and finally overturn them. And it’s close to certain that they will. There is ample precedent for the president implementing travel bans on very similar grounds as to what Trump has presented, including this hilarious example.

Aj Jazeera:

As millions of people became refugees during World War II, US President Franklin D Roosevelt argued that refugees posed a serious threat to the country’s national security. Drawing on fears that Nazi spies could be hiding among them, the country limited the number of German Jews who could be admitted to 26,000 annually. And it is estimated that for most of the Hitler era, less than 25 percent of that quota was actually filled.

This is some top-tier irony right there… A Jew travel ban to prevent Nazi spies, resulting in more Jews getting gassed in fake shower rooms.

The real question here is this: how can we tolerate having a court 80% of whose decisions are overturned? Wouldn’t that indicate that they’re completely inept, corrupt and/or dishonest?

It’s time to start seriously discussing dissolving this clown organization.

The Supreme Court has approved Trump’s travel ban on six majority-Moslem nations and there isn’t a damn thing these freaks can do about it. 

The Supreme Court is officially allowing the President’s travel ban on six majority-Moslem nations to take effect.

Took long enough!

AP:

The Supreme Court is allowing the Trump administration to fully enforce a ban on travel to the United States by residents of six mostly Muslim countries.

The justices, with two dissenting votes, said Monday that the policy can take full effect even as legal challenges against it make their way through the courts. The action suggests the high court could uphold the latest version of the ban that Trump announced in September.

The ban applies to travelers from Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen. Lower courts had said people from those nations with a claim of a “bona fide” relationship with someone in the United States could not be kept out of the country. Grandparents, cousins and other relatives were among those courts said could not be excluded.

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor would have left the lower court orders in place.

The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, will be holding arguments on the legality of the ban this week.

This is good news. Even though the ban only applies to a few countries, it is still a major symbolic victory. It sends a signal to the world that the American people are fed up with all the subhuman garbage that’s been coming in.

The Jews and the Communist left have filed all sorts of lawsuits in the lower courts to thwart Trump’s travel ban. They have specifically chosen courts in places like Hawaii and California that are filled with leftist judges hell bent on stopping Trump’s agenda irregardless of what the law actually says.

Obviously these lawsuits have been without merit. By law, the President has broad authority to control immigration into the country. That’s why when this case reached the Supreme Court, the ruling was so lopsided.

The Jew Chuck Schumer staged quite the performance earlier in the year to protest Trump’s travel ban. Let’s see if he has more crocodile tears for this Supreme Court ruling!

Congress should seriously look into impeaching these activist judges who have blocked Trump’s order. Some random judge that nobody has ever heard of in Hawaii has no business being able to thwart a presidential order on immigration. Such a person is in no position to revoke a national security decision made by the President. It is an entirely insane precedent that they’ve tried to set.

Oh well, at least the travel ban is finally in place. It might be a limited ban, but it is a definite step in the right direction. Our political enemies are extremely upset about this and that’s enough to put a big grin on my face!

According to him, the founding fathers of America are Mao and Confucius.

There’s an important question we need to ask, here.

Are Hawaiians chinks? If not, what are they? Hmmm…

Actually, there’s another question. How the hell can this country even function when any random judge can block everything the president does for no valid reason? Who thought this was a good idea?

After having his Moslem ban blocked twice by federal Judges now, the Trump administration finally managed to get a supreme court ruling overturning these spurious actions by thinly veiled Democrat operatives. And yet, this guy (who is also responsible for blocking the first travel ban) has the nerve to ignore the supreme court decision and undermine America once again.

Washington Post:

A federal judge on Tuesday largely blocked the Trump administration from implementing the latest version of the president’s controversial travel ban, setting up yet another legal showdown on the extent of the executive branch’s powers when it comes to setting immigration policy.

The decision from U.S. District Judge Derrick K. Watson in Hawaii is sure to be appealed, but for now, it means that the administration cannot restrict the entry of travelers from six of the eight countries that officials said were unable or unwilling to provide information that the United States wanted to vet the countries’ citizens.

At this point, I’m starting to suspect that being blocked at every turn is just part of Trump’s plan.

He knows that the entire establishment is against him. Congress won’t cooperate with his agenda. The judiciary won’t allow his orders to take effect. But we all knew that was going to happen.

There’s a very good chance that all of this is essentially theater, meant to lure all of Trump’s opponents into revealing how partisan, treasonous and incompetent they are. The purpose of this, of course, is to prepare the ground for a massive purge of all of these people from the government.

That swamp is about to get drained!

Bannon supporting anti-establishment candidates for the 2018 elections is also a part of this plan.

The thing is, the Judicial branch has a huge number of vacancies at the moment.

That’s 300 total open seats to fill.

Trump probably has a whole bunch of guys in mind to fill those seats. But unless congress is sympathetic, they’ll make it very hard for them to be approved.

I would wager that if the anti-establishment putsch is successful next year, we’re going to be seeing a whole lot of these empty seats getting filled up by sympathetic conservative judges.

The latest ban was set to go fully into effect in the early hours of Wednesday, barring various types of travelers from Syria, Libya, Iran, Yemen, Chad, Somalia, North Korea and Venezuela. Watson’s order stops it, at least temporarily, with respect to all the countries except North Korea and Venezuela.

In a 40-page decision granting the state of Hawaii’s request for a temporary restraining order nationwide, Watson wrote that the latest ban “suffers from precisely the same maladies as its predecessor.”

“Maladies” which the supreme court didn’t seem to mind when they overturned the block, though.

This guy is basically saying he knows better than the supreme court – he didn’t even try to find a new justification for his block order.

Isn’t there a way to fire this retard?

Watson also wrote that the executive order “plainly discriminates based on nationality” in a way that is opposed to federal law and “the founding principles of this Nation.”

TFW you create a White nationalist country, and 200 years later an island savage rules that it’s illegal to keep out Moslem terrorists.

The “founding principles of this nation,” which were established by White male slave owners, are that this is a land where White people can live free and in peace, away from people like Derrick Watson.

And those principles are going to get restored sooner than you think, Derrick. Mark my word.

Wow, since when are dog-boiling chinks allowed to decide on national security issues?

How is this not treasonous interference with the national security of America?

The Supreme Court already ruled on this, Chin Chongman.

And you lost.

Are we really going to have to go through all this nonsense again?

Washington Post:

Grandparents and other extended relatives are exempt from President Trump’s travel ban, a federal judge in Hawaii declared late Thursday, again stopping the administration from implementing the president’s controversial executive order in the way that it wants.

Are their goats exempt, too, while we’re at it?

Goats are like family to Moslems.

U.S. District Judge Derrick K. Watson wrote that the government’s “narrowly defined list” of who might be exempt was not supported by either the Supreme Court decision partially unfreezing the ban or by the law.

Which law?

Certainly not the constitution, that’s for sure – as it only applies to US citizens, not aliens on foreign soil.

Do US laws apply to space aliens as well?

“Common sense, for instance, dictates that close family members be defined to include grandparents,” Watson wrote. “Indeed, grandparents are the epitome of close family members. The Government’s definition excludes them. That simply cannot be.”

Watson wrote that refugees with an assurance from a resettlement agency could also be exempt from the ban.

This is the kicker right there.

Obviously, if rapefugees could be exempt from the ban simply for being in a relationship with some private Jew organization trying to flood America with brown people, then that’s a massive loophole.

In fact, it’s more than a loophole; it completely blows the whole travel ban apart. There would be nothing preventing every last ISIS jihadist from getting a slip from their Jew masters in order to infiltrate America.

This must be reversed.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement Friday that the Justice Department would “reluctantly return directly to the Supreme Court to again vindicate the rule of law and the executive branch’s duty to protect the nation.”

Attorney General Jeff Sessions is not amused by your impudence, chink.

“Once again, we are faced with a situation in which a single federal district court has undertaken by a nationwide injunction to micromanage decisions of the coequal executive branch related to our national security,” Sessions said. “By this decision, the district court has improperly substituted its policy preferences for the national security judgments of the executive branch in a time of grave threats, defying both the lawful prerogatives of the executive branch and the directive of the Supreme Court.”

As of Friday afternoon, the Justice Department had filed a “notice of appeal” — which lawyers view as a procedural step as they ultimately move the matter to the Supreme Court.

Appealing this isn’t enough.

There’s no end to this kind of ridiculous interference.

Those responsible must be punished, so as to stop this from happening non-stop. Otherwise, everything the Trump administration tries to do will be cockblocked by random scumbags in the federal court circuit.

Soon, Trump’s power will be better established, and he will be able to move more decisively against his enemies.

You better hope the next executive order doesn’t ban chink judges from travelling outside of a federal prison.

These judges on the 9th Circuit Court should be removed from the bench and put in a concentration camp!

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld the retarded ruling against President Trump’s lawful and Constitutional temporary travel ban on seven majority-Moslem nations. While the ruling is insane by any practical standards, this was not a surprise. This federal appeals court based out of San Francisco is well-known for all sorts of crazy rulings that have ultimately been overturned by the Supreme Court.

USA Today:

A federal appeals court Thursday refused to let President Trump reinstitute a temporary ban on travelers from seven majority-Muslim nations, ruling that the president’s order violates the due process rights of people affected by the ban.

The quick decision from a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit could lead to a showdown at the Supreme Court, unless the administration agrees to dial back the travel ban or try its case before a federal judge in Seattle who ordered it stopped last week.

“Although courts owe considerable deference to the President’s policy determinations with respect to immigration and national security, it is beyond question that the federal judiciary retains the authority to adjudicate constitutional challenges to executive action,” the judge wrote in their opinion.

The ban, announced Jan. 27, temporarily barred citizens of Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen for 90 days, all refugees for 120 days, and Syrian citizens indefinitely. It led to chaos at U.S. and international airports as tens of thousands of visa holders were blocked from entering the country or detained after arriving in the U.S.

There is no disputing that the President has the authority to determine what foreigners can and cannot enter the country. This type of nonsense from the judiciary is not going to stand. They’re legislating from the bench instead of interpreting the law as written.

Trump has already declared that he’s going to fight the ruling in court. Which court this will go to next remains to be seen. He has different options.

SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 9, 2017

Trump’s political enemies are going to fight his agenda by filing endless numbers of lawsuits. There’s no question that this will be their main strategy. The good news about this is that the more lawsuits they file the more foolish they’ll look. Trump will be able to use this type of overreaching judicial obstructionism stemming from the lawsuits as a potentially powerful political weapon. He could even use their obstructionism to justify limiting the power of these courts. Judicial overreach has been a major problem for quite awhile. Pat Buchanan has written a piece going into this further.

We’ll see where this goes but a war between Trump and the judiciary might not be a bad thing in the long term.

The confused Negro Red Cross head, Elhadj As Sy, claims that closing borders and imposing travel bans to isolate the Ebola virus is irrational.

CBC:

Closing borders will not effectively curb Ebola infections, the head of the Red Cross said on Wednesday, amid debate over whether bans on travel from hardest-hit African countries would help combat the spread of the deadly virus.

This year’s outbreak of the highly infectious hemorrhagic fever thought to have originated in forest bats is the worst on record, having killed more than 4,500 people, mostly in Liberia, Guinea and Sierra Leone.

Travellers from the region have infected two people in the U.S. state of Texas and one in Madrid, prompting some leaders, including some U.S. lawmakers, to urge a ban on travel from West Africa.

Elhadj As Sy, Secretary General of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), said such restrictions would not make sense.

“It (Ebola) creates a lot of fear and extreme panic that sometimes lead to very irrational type of behaviours and measures, like closing borders, cancelling flights, isolating countries etc.,” Sy told reporters in Beijing, where the IFRC, the world’s largest humanitarian network, was holding a conference.

“Those are not solutions. The only solution is how can we join our efforts to contain those kinds of viruses and epidemics at their epicentre, right where they start.”

This man is obviously an idiot and undoubtedly obtained his position because they needed a token Black guy to lead the organization.  After all, it is more important to show the world that the Red Cross isn’t “racist” than to hire someone who is actually qualified to do the job.

If you have any sort of contagious virus and you want to prevent it from spreading, you don’t let people who are infected or may potentially be infected move into other areas.  Doing so puts more people at risk and increases the chance that the virus will spread.

There’s a reason why quarantines have historically been used to contain virus and disease outbreaks.

But of course all of this is “racist,” so I must be wrong.