Everything is rape these days.

What did Puff Daddy actually even do? People keep saying “it’s like Epstein,” but it looks a lot more like Weinstein to me.

Daily Mail:

Teachers are telling schoolboys that displaying traditional gendered roles in a family could lead to them committing rape, a bombshell report has claimed.

The report from the Family Education Trust (FET) found that almost a third of schools that it surveyed use relationship and sex education classes to teach pupils about ‘toxic masculinity’.

In one schools’ teaching materials on the subject, children are told that while masculinity ‘in and itself is not necessarily a harmful thing’ certain masculine traits can be be seen as ‘problematic’.

Another presents a ‘pyramid of sexual violence‘, which suggests that certain minor behaviours such as ‘displaying traditional gendered roles’ may develop into other examples of ‘gender-based violence’ such as flashing, groping and even rape.

The FET said that such lessons are teaching pupils about a ‘problematic new ideology’ that presents the idea that ‘boys and men possess traits that are inherently negative for society’.

The report, titled ‘Boys and the Burden of Labels: An examination of masculinity teaching in schools’, surveyed 303 secondary schools and academies across the country, asking whether they taught the concept of ‘toxic masculinity’ in lessons on relationships and sex education.

It found that of the 197 schools that responded, 62 confirmed they were teaching lessons on ‘toxic masculinity’.

A total of 10 schools also admitted that they were teaching that ‘men and boys possess traits that are inherently toxic and negative for society’.

The FET were also shown a range of teaching materials that the surveyed schools used for lessons about ‘toxic masculinity’.

The report stated that these resources often portrayed masculinity ‘exclusively through a feminist lens’ and ‘on occasion this was overtly political’.

One slide from a lesson on ‘toxic masculinity’ states that while ‘masculinity in and itself is not necessarily a harmful thing…the way that masculinity is traditionally defined in society can be problematic’.

It adds that certain masculine traits ‘can be limiting for women, girls and other people who don’t identify as men who are not expected to display these traits’.

Another slide also informs pupils of the difference between ‘toxic masculinity’ and misogyny. It states that ‘ordering a man a beer without first asking what he wants’ as an example of ‘toxic masculinity’, while ‘trying to control what your girlfriend wears’ is seen as misogynistic.

The reports adds: ‘There was a strong emphasis that traits such as strength when inhabited by men could very quickly lead to misogyny.

‘Anyone can display toxic behaviour, but schools are confusing behaviour taken to extremes as the standard archetype of masculinity.’

I did a pyramid of sexual violence once.

I don’t regret it, but I wouldn’t do it again.

We have to turn everyone into a faggot to stop car crashes.

Sound familiar?

It’s a template:

Bad thing -> solution (Jewish agenda) -> utopia

So far, it’s never worked.

We do not yet have a utopia.

But you have to become a faggot, because we at least need to try one more time to build a utopia.

Because why would anyone want to live, except in a utopia?

The Guardian:

A road safety awareness campaign in France is tackling the role of gendered behaviour behind the wheel, warning for the first time that toxic masculinity could be as important a contributing factor to road deaths as speed, alcohol, drugs and fatigue.

The campaign’s video – released for the web, TV cinemas on Wednesday – shows men at the births of their sons and seeks to portray them as thoughtful and sensitive in contrast with the revved-up virility of macho stereotypes.

“Speed, alcohol, drugs, fatigue … what if we need to add masculinity?” asked the French road safety body of the list of factors that typically lead to road accidents.

In France, 78% of those killed in road accidents in 2022 were men – close to the average across the EU. Of French drivers aged 18 – to 24 killed on the road last year, 88% were men. Of people suspected to have caused road accidents, 84% were men, while men accounted for 93% of drunk drivers involved in an accident.

Men drive more, and are vastly overrepresented in jobs that require driving, including driving buses, taxis and trucks.

Was that taken into account?

Probably not.

Florence Guillaume, the interministerial delegate for road safety in France, said the campaign was absolutely not about stigmatising or blaming men in general. “It is about prompting people to examine their behaviour,” she said.

Guillaume said the number of men dying on the roads was a serious issue and “does not mean all men are bad drivers – that is not true”. Instead, she said society should look deeper at behaviours such as risk-taking or the pressures on some men to show they could drive faster or seek to dominate the road.

The message of the video campaign is about urging men to resist social pressure. “You don’t have to follow what people expect of a man,” the voice of a new father tells his son in the clip.

The sociologist Alain Mergier carried out a study on masculinity and driving across all age groups for the campaign. He said: “It’s striking how certain stereotypes are persistently passed from father to son, including the car as a symbolic object of masculinity, male identity and virility. This isn’t given much thought and yet we can see the far-reaching impact on accidents.”

Why do the people lecturing us on masculinity always have so little of it themselves?

He said some boys and men were taught from childhood that the car was their symbol and it was through driving that they could “defend their manliness”.

…

“It could lead to the sense that a man has to prove himself by mastering a vehicle, such as accelerating or breaking speed limits to show ‘I’m a real man’,” Mergier added.

He said the instinct for some male drivers to compete after being overtaken by another car comes from a sense among some “that masculinity has to be defended, lest it be seen as fragile or vulnerable”.

“What’s important about this campaign is that it doesn’t stigmatise men, it suggests another vision of men and masculinity, which is not about confrontation, or being aggressive, but about sensitivity,” he said.

In other words it’s about “being a faggot.”

There is no reality in which “sensitivity” and “man” are the same thing. I can promise you that. If you are sensitive, you are not a man, in fact. You are instead a faggot pussy.

“Doctor” is another one of those words that’s starting to mean literally nothing

The guy is becoming more convincing by the day.

What’s more woman-like than being delusional and using made-up terms that mean nothing whenever someone tries to explain how reality works?

PJ Media:

This weekend, a biological male who identifies as a transgender woman and who won a global cycling championship last year complained about how “toxic masculinity” makes women feel uncomfortable. Some feminists found this remarkably ironic.

You know what’s even more ironic?

Seeing that men have an inherent biological advantage over women and still being a feminist.

“Toxic masculinity includes not being able to recognize when women are deeply uncomfortable with your behavior or presence,” Rachel McKinnon, an assistant professor of philosophy at the College of Charleston in South Carolina, tweeted. McKinnon became infamous for winning the gold medal in the women’s 35-54 age group in the 2018 Masters Track Cycling World Championships.

People spend a lot of money and years of their life to be “taught” philosophy by this mentally ill faggot.

He probably also makes more money than most of you reading this ever will.

Feeling bad about being normal yet?

“It’s definitely NOT fair,” Jennifer Wagner, the third-place finisher from Houston, Texas, said in a tweet responding to British conservative Katie Hopkins. Hopkins tweeted an image of the three cyclists on the championship podium. “For clarity — this was the WOMENS world championships. I repeat. Women’s. Congratulations to the brave faces of silver and bronze. The world is gripped by febrile madness,” Hopkins had tweeted.

Carolien van Herrikhuyzen, a silver medalist in another age group from the Netherlands, defended McKinnon. “No one is a transgender to steal anyone’s medal,” she tweeted. “We had an honest race under the UCI rules. If you compete you accept the rules, otherwise, don’t compete.”

The one complaining about it was in the same group, and the one defending it was in another group.

I’m sure that’s just a coincidence.

Feminists responded with similar outrage after McKinnon attacked “toxic masculinity.”

“‘Rachel’ McKinnon is a man who has transjacked women’s cycling competitions without regard for how deeply uncomfortable real women are with his behavior or presence,” Kaeley Triller Harms, co-founder of Hands Across the Aisle Women’s Coalition, posted on Facebook Sunday.

“Transjacked” is not really a word.

But then, none of the people involved here are what they say they are, so I’ll allow it.

Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull, also known as Posie Parker, the founder of the global women’s rights group Standing For Women, would not say McKinnon was himself an example of toxic masculinity. She attacked “toxic masculinity” as an “absurd term.” Yet she did not spare McKinnon from criticism.

“I would just say that McKinnon is a vile entitled nasty man,” Keen-Minshull said.

Damn.

I really need to update my Important Womyn List, because I’ve never heard of any of these whores before.

This is both funny and sad at the same time

Many feminists have grown more outspoken against the trend of biological men competing in women’s sports. Former Olympic swimmer Sharron Davies has warned that many female athletes keep silent about the injustice for fear of retribution — getting kicked off of teams. She also condemned the victory of biological male Mary Gregory in women’s weightlifting.

While transgender activists like McKinnon argue that the natural range of testosterone in women does reach high levels, they ignore the key fact that males with X and Y chromosomes experience higher levels of testosterone from the womb onwards. This changes the basic chemistry and body shape of their bodies, giving an inherent advantage in many sports. There are excellent reasons to exclude biological males from women’s sports, even if they undergo some form of feminizing “transition.” Men and women are physically different, and no amount of social engineering can change that.

That’s a lot of overthinking for something as simple as “men are not women and women are not men and you’re mentally ill if you think otherwise.”

Must be tough not being Shlomo’s main battering ram against civilization anymore.

I have no sympathy though, since you womyn literally did this to yourselves – and to the rest of us as well.

But don’t worry, because we’re gonna fix this up real soon, and you’re going back to making sandwiches and babies, which are the only good things a woman can ever do with her life.

And the remarkably ironic thing is that you’ll be happier that way, even though you don’t deserve to be.

Gillette, a razor company best known for their slogan “The Best a Man Can Get,” has just made one of the dumbest marketing decisions imaginable. They decided to launch a new ad campaign lecturing men about their “toxic masculinity.”

WSJ:

Gillette is embracing the #MeToo movement in a new digital ad campaign aimed at men, the latest message from an advertiser attempting to change societal norms.

The ad, dubbed “We Believe,” opens with audio of news about the current #MeToo movement, bullying and “toxic masculinity.” A narrator then goes on to dispute the notion that “boys will be boys,” asking, “Is this the best a man can get? Is it? We can’t hide from it. It has been going on far too long. We can’t laugh it off, making the same old excuses.”

The ad puts a new spin on the brand’s 30-year tagline, “The Best A Man Can Get,” challenging men to take positive actions, such as stopping other men, and the next generation, from harassing women.

The last thing you want to do in an ad campaign is insult your target audience and that’s effectively what Gillette did here. The ad basically presents natural male behavior as evil and wrong. It literally portrays attempts by men to hit on and pick up women as a bad thing for society. It also stereotypes men as bullies obsessed with sexually harassing women and grilling meat.

And worse yet, it features a cameo appearance by the horrible wench and recent wall-hitter Ana Kasparian from The Young Turks!

Furthermore, there are bizarre racial undertones. This advertisement literally features a black man stopping a white man from flirting with a white woman on the street, apparently to protect her dignity (or whatever).

It calls this “acting the right way,” and implies that the viewer should be a giant of modern morals like this black man and stop his friends from flirting on the street.

It goes on to encourage child abuse by telling the viewer to encourage his sons to be faggots.

These are the last things you want to include in an ad that is theoretically supposed to get men to buy shaving products. It’s no different than if a cosmetics company put out an ad criticizing women for “toxic feminism” and portraying them as slutty front holes. But at least in that case, the ad would be an accurate portrayal considering all the dumb THOTS and whores we see walking around these days.

Not surprisingly, the ad on YouTube has been ratioed all to hell. At time of writing the ad has roughly 19,000 likes compared to 190,000 dislikes.

Comments posted underneath the video have been savage. Many commenters have even accused Gillette of deleting some of the top comments. These include one’s referencing how their wife’s boyfriend and their wife’s boyfriend’s female son loved the ad.

Here’s a small sampling.

Needless to say, this is a marketing disaster of epic proportions. It has convinced a large percentage of the men who have viewed the ad to never buy Gillette products again.

What’s worse for the company, the only conceivable target audience for this type of message has beards.

Of course, today’s average corporate marketing department is filled with some of the most vapid and self-absorbed millennial female skanks you’ll find anywhere. So it is not much of a surprise that something this insane was produced.

It’s also worth noting that a low IQ Paki named Pankaj Bhalla is in charge of North America’s Gillette brand. It’s safe to assume that he played a major role in approving this dumpster fire of an ad campaign. And does anybody think this fool would have landed this job if it wasn’t for affirmative action?

Pankaj Bhalla, Gillette affirmative action hire.

But this trend of companies injecting politics into commercials is becoming increasingly disturbing and tiresome. Mostly because the politics that get pushed are always based around Jewish social-engineering programs. It’s just a constant barrage of bashing White males while pushing race-mixing, feminism and other weirdness.

Let’s send Gillette a message by boycotting their products entirely. They might not have realized yet, but their lecture about “toxic masculinity” is only going to be toxic to their brand.

Seriously, this isn’t just rhetoric. If you use Gillette, switch to a different brand next time you’re buying razors. A recent “Ask Men” article ranking the quality of razors only put Gillette in third place anyway, with the number one being the Merkur Futur safety razor and the number two being the Harry’s Truman cheap disposable type razor. Their fourth place is Shave Club, which is basically a Gillette knock-off (if you’re used to that style).

You may enjoy investing in a safety razor. They definitely give a better shave – cleaner, with less likelihood of little pimples.

With shaving cream, whatever generic brand is already the same as Gillette’s.

Any of those will do, and you can live the rest of your life knowing you are not contributing to this kind of faggotism. We have seen brands lose stock value for this type of politicized advertising, and we can clearly do that here.

Gillette may be the number one brand, but it certainly is not a monopoly.

Andrew Anglin contributed to this report.

In a shocking twist of events, women prefer masculine men over soy-filled faggots.

Stop being a faggot and hit the gym.