He was Chinese, btw.

You racists assumed it was a Pakistani, didn’t you?

Never assume the race, goyim. It just makes you look prejudiced.

East London Advertiser:

A man has been charged with stabbing four people at two health centres in Bow.

Jeffrey Leung, 40, of Malmesbury Road, Bow, will appear in custody at Thames Magistrates’ Court today charged with four counts of grievous bodily harm (GBH) with intent, one count of attempted GBH with intent and one count of threatening behaviour with a bladed article.

The charges follow stabbings at two medical centres – in St Stephen’s Road and William Place – shortly after 11am on Wednesday.

Two men, aged 24 and 33, were found wounded at the first location, a 77-year-old woman and another man, 54, injured at the second a short time later.

What is so unreasonable about this humble thought-leader’s proposal?

RT:

Sunday Times columnist, Rod Liddle has caused a furore on social media after penning an article about hate preacher and IS sympathizer Anjem Choudary, in which he encourages British Islamists to “blow themselves up” in London.

Sunday Times columnist, Rod Liddle has caused a furore on social media after penning an article about hate preacher and IS sympathizer Anjem Choudary, in which he encourages British Islamists to “blow themselves up” in London.

In his Sunday Times article, Liddle alleges that Choudary had encouraged British Islamists to leave the UK and blow themselves up, to which he remarks “I really don’t mind” – adding they can do that here in the UK, as long as it’s far from where any of us live, like Tower Hamlets. The east London borough of Tower Hamlets has a large muslim population. 

I think that Rod made a similar argument to the whole “Sex Ed” argument that they used to push on us in school.

Kids are going to have sex no matter what, so we may as well tell them to have sex, but not harm themselves. 

A variation of this is Rod’s argument:

Moslems are going to blow themselves up no matter what, so we may as well encourage them to just harm themselves. 

Solid thinking. No one cares about what happens in Tower Hamlets. Those are the Lost Territories.

So, yes.

Let them blow themselves up in turf wars between ISIS and Al-Qaeda and Al-Nusra and Muslim Brotherhood or whatever.

Liddle writes: “He has urged British Islamists to leave the country and blow themselves up. Me too. Actually, I don’t really mind if they don’t leave the country, so long as they blow themselves up – somewhere a decent distance from where the rest of us live. Tower Hamlets, for example.”

The right-wing journo, who is also associate editor of The Spectator, has received widespread condemnation on social media for his comments. Mehdi Hasan, a presenter on Al Jazeera and columnist for The Intercept labelled Liddle’s article as “racism and incitement to violence.”

Is the British establishment trying to suggest that it is better that they blow up White Britons instead? 

Since we know they’re going to blow up somebody, we need to sit down like adults and pick who. 

Rod Little’s suggestion must be considered. 

The UK is in a hell of a mess right now.

Across the country, there are tens of thousands of British citizens with unlicensed teaspoons, butter knives and other weapons in their kitchen drawers.

These criminals know that being in possession of unlicensed forks leads to a minimum sentence of 25 years in prison, but they’re prepared to take the risk – just because they don’t want to be subjected to the bi-weekly cutlery checks to which all license owners must agree.

Unsurprisingly, local councils fail to catch most of these people due to the sheer number of them.

From time to time, however, councils do succeed in catching a particularly nefarious crook who thought he or she could operate without a permit for a license.

This is one of those times.

The Independent:

A five-year-old girl was left in tears after she was fined £150 for setting up a lemonade stand in east London.

Andre Spicer’s daughter decided to sell cups of lemonade at the end of her street in Mile End, as hundreds of people were attending Lovebox festival in nearby Victoria Park.

But within 30 minutes of setting up, four council enforcement officers approached her table and read from a legal letter informing her that, because she didn’t have a trading permit, she would be fined £150.

The father and daughter duo quickly packed up the stand and went home.

Writing about the incident in The Telegraph, Mr Spicer said: “I’m a professor in a business school, so I probably should have known some kind of permit was required. But this was a five-year-old kid selling lemonade. She wasn’t exactly a public safety hazard.”

Following the exchange, his daughter “sobbed all the way home”.

She told him: “I’ve done a bad thing.”

Though he offered to get her a permit and open a stall on another day, his daughter said it was “too scary”.

British council workers breaking down Mr. Spicer’s door in search of the child.

This little snake in the grass thought she was above the law. She believed that she could blow a big raspberry in the face of the British establishment and remain unpunished.

Now she’s scarred for life.

Was the thrill of operating an illegal drinks stand worth it, child?

No, didn’t think so.

Incidentally, this crime occurred in Tower Hamlets, which is the most colorsome borough in London:

The center of Tower Hamlets.

This means that a good number of shopkeepers whose businesses this White child undercut with cheap lemonade were of the Moslem faith.

Call me jaded and cynical, but I doubt that’s a coincidence. There’s definitely racist intent in this girl’s actions (and possibly her father’s, too) that requires further investigation.

Anyway, hopefully the widespread coverage of this criminal act will discourage other White children from thinking that selling drinks without a trading permit is a good idea. British councils and law enforcement need more time to investigate even bigger crimes, such as the nationwide grooming of Moslem children by White Christians.

An ongoing trend in the United Kingdom is for White Englishmen to throw acid into Moslems’ faces to turn their skin white.

I know what you’re thinking: “I’ve never heard of that happening before.”

True, but just because it hasn’t happened before, doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen all the time.

The Independent:

A spate of acid attacks has left some Muslim residents of east London afraid to leave their homes.

Fears have been heightened after 21-year-old aspiring model Resham Khan and her cousin Jameel Muhktar, 37, suffered horrific injuries when an attacker squirted acid through their car window in Newham, east London, on 21 June.

Police initially said they had no evidence the attack was racially or religiously motivated.

They reclassified it as a hate crime, however, after Mr Muhktar insisted Islamophobia was involved, and after posts expressing sympathy for the far-right were allegedly found on the Facebook page of John Tomlin, 24, who is being sought for questioning in relation to the incident.

As news of the attack spread, social media users began to report other acid attacks, with some speculating that Muslims or people of Asian appearance were being targeted.

Before White people.

After White people.

Are you happy now, Britons?

Moslems have been living peacefully in the UK for decades. They build churches, volunteer at homeless shelters and pay taxes so you can continue living on welfare at their expense.

And even after you bombed their concert in Manchester and plowed into them with a rented vehicle on London Bridge, they hold their heads high and continue supporting their adopted nation.

But throwing acid in their faces because you’re disgusted by their skin color?

Even Moslems draw the line at that one. And now, thanks to the fear you’ve spread throughout the British Moslem community, the entire First World infrastructure that they maintain threatens to implode and pull you down with it.

Fears about what was happening led to east London residents calling an emergency meeting on Sunday evening that was attended by Tower Hamlets mayor John Biggs.

He listened as the resident chairing the meeting said: “These attacks are happening on our doorsteps. Our women, our men, our youngsters are feeling unsafe. They are scared to come out of their homes.”

The fears were echoed by a local imam, who stressed that some acid attacks were robberies, not hate crimes, but admitted: “Even my own wife was saying to me yesterday that she didn’t want to leave the house because she might face an acid attack.”

On social media, meanwhile, the warnings have included: “Please be careful, especially if you’re brown. These attacks seem to be targeting south Asians or ‘Muslim looking people’.”

There it is again: that irrational fear of the color brown!

Why is it that whenever White people invade and conquer a historically brown country, such as the UK or Sweden, they immediately bully and intimidate the natives because of their melanin levels?

Melanin is needed to protect colored people from the harsh, tropical weather of Northern Europe. Yet despite its evolutionary benefits, White people seem to have an in-built hatred of it.

It’s truly baffling.

In March, a Freedom of Information request to the Metropolitan Police suggested Newham was the London borough with the most recorded acid attacks, with 398 incidents between 2011 and 2016.

Tower Hamlets had the third highest number of acid attacks, with 84 incidents recorded between 2011 and 2016.

Tower Hamlets.

Newham and Tower Hamlets have the highest Moslem populations in London, so there’s a good chance that these acid attackers are, as usual, White Christians.

But in the UK, acid attack charities believe that a high percentage of attacks are male-on-male, with gang members increasingly using acid as an easily-obtained weapon.

Yes, you read that correctly: right-wing skinheads are patrolling the streets of East London, throwing acid into the faces of Moslems in an attempt to change their race.

Clearly, banning butter knives and teaspoons has done little to quell their thirst for skin-hatred, so it looks like banning all corrosive liquids – including vinegar – might be the only solution here.

If these measures are actively enforced, it’s still possible to prevent the British caliphate from turning into a Christian theocracy.

Every year, countless traditional English mosques are demolished and replaced with Christian churches.

An East London MP claimed the Labour Party has been the target of a Trojan Horse plot to infiltrate it with Islamic extremists, according to the Evening Standard. He says his party has rejected “several hundred” membership applications from people the party believed were extremists, and expelled others.

Jim Fitzpatrick said that the re-election of Lutfur Rahman as Mayor of Tower Hamlets was evidence the borough was being taken over by “race politics”. Rahman is often accused of favouring Muslims over anyone else, and has been the subject of significant criticism.

Poplar and Limehouse MP Mr Fitzpatrick claimed that Mr Rahman’s newly established Tower Hamlet’s First Party is “mono-cultural” as it has 18 councillors, all of whom are Bengali and 17 of whom are men.

“We think our act is pretty clean now, but that doesn’t stop people trying because that’s what was influencing our politics in the past and that’s certainly a way of working,” he told the Standard.

“Much as the entryism, the Trojan Horse allegations [were] in education in Birmingham, the Trojan Horse in east London was a political one rather than an educational one.

“We’ve been trying to build an inclusive, tolerant, cohesive community in east London and there are some people who want to take us backwards into race politics, and certainly monochrome politics, and that’s just not the future.

“There’s a small minority who are determined to try and manipulate opinion to get their way and we’ve got to guard against that.”

The borough itself is remarkably divided already, and used to be one of the poorest parts of Britain. However, in the 1980s the Conservative government embarked on a vast regeneration project centred on the abandoned Canary Wharf dock on the Isle of Dogs.

Today the area is home to some of the world’s most significant corporations like HSBC but in surrounding areas the poorer immigrant communities remain. The borough itself is 32 percent Bengali Muslim.

Allegations of wrongdoing are not new in Tower Hamlets, with Breitbart London exposing a large number electoral practices at last month’s elections that could be illegal.

If Mr Fitzpatrick is right in saying that the Labour Party is a target for infiltration, national security questions would be raised, especially as it comes amidst concerns that the party is likely to run Sadiq Khan MP as their London Mayoral candidate. Mr Khan admitted to being a friend and supporter of Babar Ahmad, a self-confessed terrorist.

Whilst Mr Ahmed was fighting extradition to the US to face allegations of being an Al-Qaeda fundraiser Mr Khan supported the campaign to release him and visited him in prison. Once Ahmad was extradited to America he pleaded guilty to terrorist offences.

Britain is turning into a third world country. If you want to know how and why, consider three of the ongoing scandals that continued to fester over the weekend.

The first concerns allegations of vote-rigging in London borough of Tower Hamlets, where scandal-wracked, Islamist-linked mayor Lutfur Rahman has just won a second term as mayor.

The mayor himself, according to a senior Labour figure present, was “visibly throwing his weight around” and being “overly familiar with count staff, some of whom were telling him they had voted for him even as they counted the votes”. Mr Golds, another subjected to a recount, found his vote had changed by more than a fifth overnight, from 1,098 to 1,345.

And Sanu Miah?In the recount, his vote dropped by a quarter from 2,270 to 1,722 and he fell from first place to sixth. Two of the three seats in his ward went to Mr Rahman’s Tower Hamlets First party. “I think this election was stolen from me,” said Mr Miah.

Not everyone agrees with that. One of Mr Miah’s opponents had the same surname: the counters could have got them mixed up. But he might be right. The normal rules do not apply in Tower Hamlets. It was Britain’s most troubling election in Britain’s most troubling borough.

Then there’s the similarly troubling case of Operation Trojan Horse – the campaign to infiltrate a number of state schools in Birmingham, oust non-Muslim teachers, hijack the curriculum, segregate boys from girls and create a corner of the English Midlands that is forever Islamabad.

At Park View, for example, there have been complaints of segregation in classrooms and of GCSE syllabuses being restricted to comply with conservative Islamic teaching. Sex education lessons have allegedly seen impressionable teenage boys told that rape is legal in marriage, while religious education classes have apparently seen pupils given a list of Christian teachers and told to try to convert them. At one assembly, a senior teacher is said to have endorsed terrorist Anwar al-Awlaki. At another, detailed by a Sunday newspaper, he allegedly described non-Muslims to pupils as ‘kuffar’ —or infidels.

Sex education lessons have, according to reports in a Sunday newspaper, seen impressionable teenage boys told rape is legal in marriage, while religious education classes have seen pupils given a list of Christian teachers and told to try to convert them Last November, Sheikh Shady al-Suleiman, a preacher many regard as extremist, was invited to speak at the school.

Nigel Sloan, a former teacher at the school, has said Mozz Hussain, the deputy headmaster, preached ‘mind-blowing’ anti-American and anti-Western ‘propaganda’ to pupils, describing the U.S. as ‘the evil in the world’ and ‘the cause of all famine’.

And finally, from Charles Moore,an excellent insight as to why this has been allowed to happen. In a piece entitled “Our voting system is flawed but politicians don’t seem to care”, he writes:

Tower Hamlets has been a problem for many years, but its controversies are not unique. There have been cases of electoral malpractice in Birmingham, Bradford, Slough, Woking, Peterborough. There are also serious problems, particularly in big cities, with the Electoral Register.

Fraud, he says, is widespread – and known by the authorities to be widespread:

There are two reasons for this –forgery and coercion. The first has now been mitigated by insisting on postal voters giving a signature and a date of birth (in Tower Hamlets this time, no fewer than 10 per cent of the postal votes returned were rejected because of discrepancies in this area). The second flourishes, particularly in minority ethnic communities, where leaders can exploit clan or family ties to “harvest” votes from their juniors and from women.

So why is so little being done about it? One answer is that the very institutions charged with preventing this kind of behaviour have been turning a deliberate blind eye to it.

Enter the Electoral Commission – yes, the same Electoral Commission recently embroiled in another scandal concerning a UKIP lookalike on the European election ballot papers. It turns out that this quango, stuffed with usual bien-pensant apparatchiks, is so busy trying to encourage “engagement” – getting people to take part in the voting process – that it prefers not to deal with the less fluffy and more challenging issue of voter fraud.

The Electoral Commission is the body supposed to ensure that all is well with British voting. But if you look at its remit and pronouncements, you will see that it focuses more on engagement than on making votes trustworthy. In a speech in March, its chairman, Jenny Watson, seemed preoccupied with the need to “modernise”. “As a society, we are at risk,” she said clumsily, “of how we ask people to engage with our electoral system… becoming increasingly disconnected from how they interact with both each other and with other institutions, from their banking arrangements to their weekly shop.” The system needed to be “more reflective of the wider society”. She said how nice it would be if people could register to vote on the actual day of the election. She played down issues of fraud. She praised the work of pressure groups, such as Operation Black Vote (OBV), which try to get new voters. She did not praise anyone who checks that registered voters are true ones.

But it’s not just the Electoral Commission which is to blame. So too are those police – presumably obeying orders from on high – stood by and watched as the thoroughly illegal voter intimidation took place in Tower Hamlets. So too are the local councillors in Labour-controlled Birmingham. So too is the coalition government, which is said to have been warned four years ago that Operation Trojan Horse was taking place. So too are the three main political parties, all of whom have agreed that dealing with postal-vote is not priority.

Final thought.

Everyone in authority is so afraid of being accused of being “racist” or “Islamophobic” that they have found it easier to sweep the issue under the carpet than confront it. But the problem isn’t going to go away. In fact – until someone, somewhere finds the courage to deal with it – it’s bound to get an awful lot worse.

Nonwhite colonizer-controlled neighborhoods in many parts of Britain have already collapsed into typical Third World electoral fraud and administrative chaos, reports following last week’s elections in that country have revealed.

According to reports from around the country, British police are investigating more than fifty cases of voter fraud while in one local authority in London, which is run almost completely by nonwhites, Tower Hamlets, the administrative chaos caused a five day delay in getting results out for all of the city.

The electoral fraud so rampant in parts of the Third World which actually hold elections—such as India and Pakistan—has long been apparent in previous elections in Britain, but this is the first time that election results have actually been delayed due to Third World administrative chaos.

Warned ahead of time, police were deployed at more than 100 polling stations in the areas with the largest number of nonwhites in areas previously identified by the UK’s Electoral Commission as being “high risk” for vote-rigging.

More than half of the reported incidents of electoral fraud took place in the nonwhite colonizer dominated towns of West Yorkshire. There, in a rash of incidents prevalent amongst the Pakistani and Indian communities, thousands of “ghost” voters, false statements and multiple votes have taken place, mostly in favor of Labour Party supported candidates.

The other incidents have been reported in cities where nonwhite colonizers also have a large presence—Manchester, Bradford, London, and Birmingham.

According to a report in the far left Guardian newspaper, the “inquiries have emerged after the Guardian contacted police forces covering 16 areas that the elections watchdog has identified as being vulnerable to electoral fraud, particularly around the use of postal votes.

“As well as Birmingham and Bradford, they include Blackburn with Darwen, Burnley, Calderdale, Coventry, Derby, Hyndburn, Kirklees, Oldham, Pendle, Peterborough, Slough, Tower Hamlets, Walsall, and Woking.”

The paper added that West Yorkshire police, whose officers serve Bradford where former councillors have been imprisoned for electoral fraud, said they had received 21 allegations of electoral irregularities.

There are another 14 investigations across Greater London. Two prospective councillors in the Tower Hamlets and Enfield local authorities were arrested for making false declarations on election papers.

Even Peter Golds, a Jewish homosexual who is one of the few Conservative Party councilors in Tower Hamlets, has called the voting carry-on in Tower Hamlets “Third World.”

Writing in his column in a local newspaper, Gold said that “Sadly the count showed much of what is worst about the divided politics of this borough. Well before the 2am declaration of the mayoral election, the counting centre was besieged by a threatening crowd of Tower Hamlets First supporters.

“A member of Labour’s shadow cabinet, who had been attending the count, was told that he should not leave as the police could not guarantee his safety. He did leave shortly after.

“Another small group, including women, who were by this time exhausted, required a police escort to their car and still later our local MP and one of the mayoral candidates had to leave by the rear of the building.

“Behaviour that would be shocking in the third world, should not be permitted in the world’s greatest and most multi-cultural city.”

Earlier, Golds claimed that the counting procedure was an “omnishambles.”

He wrote: “We were asked to attend the Mile End Leisure centre at 2pm, Sunday for the council counts with the European count commencing at 4pm. We were let in at 3pm and then the chaos started.

“There were arguments, threats, and chaos at the counting tables. Tower Hamlets First supporters were challenging vote after vote, forcing supporters of other candidates away from the tables.

“Former Cllr Mohammed Shahid Ali (defeated Mile End) was bawling in Bangla down a mobile phone at a counting table. He was asked by a (female) officer to stop and he shouted that she (emphasise she) had no right to tell him to stop doing anything and that she (emphasise she) should go away. I drew this to the attention of the returning officer and Shahid Ali then needed to be restrained from attacking me.

“Despite everything we had been told, the count was a shocker. There was a 21% discrepancy in the votes in Island Gardens between the first two counts.”

The Electoral Commission has now said it will look into “issues” surrounding the poll after complaints of voter intimidation and large discrepancies in recounts.

A spokesman said: “Clearly there have been issues at the Tower Hamlets count and we need to make sure we understand what happened, and the reasons for it, before reaching any conclusions.

“As part of our review we will be talking to the Returning Officer and Regional Returning Officer. We will be looking closely at what happened during the count, as well as the planning that took place beforehand.

“Once we have concluded the review we will publish its findings in our report on the elections.”

Tomorrow thousands of real voters – plus, if past Tower Hamlets elections are any guide, quite a few fake ones – will deliver their verdicts on the borough’s extremist-linked executive mayor, Lutfur Rahman. Rahman’s council is currently under investigation by both the police and an official inquiry ordered by the Communities Secretary, Eric Pickles.

In case anyone’s still wondering why, here (in no particular order) are my Top Thirty facts about this great democrat, socialist and human being:

1) In 2008 Rahman (then a Labour councillor) won the leadership of Tower Hamlets council with the close help of an Islamic extremist group, the Islamic Forum of Europe, which which works to create a sharia state and an “Islamic social, economic and political order” in Britain. In secret filming, IFE activists described how they exercised “consolidated… influence and power” over the council.

2) Rahman channelled millions of pounds in council grants to IFE front organisations and appointed a senior IFE figure as assistant chief executive of the council, though he was wholly unqualified for this senior post. Both the assistant chief executive and Rahman were subsequently removed from their jobs.

3) An extremist preacher was invited to speak in the council chamber and extremist literature, including audio tapes by the al-Qaeda cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, was stocked in Tower Hamlets libraries.

4) In 2010, after a campaign including large numbers of fake signatures led by the IFE, Tower Hamlets was changed from having a conventional council leader to a far more personally powerful, directly-elected mayor. In secret filming, senior IFE activists described how they would “get one of our brothers” into the new post.

5) Rahman personally signed up entire families as sham members of the Labour Party to win selection as the Labour mayoral candidate. He was selected, but was then removed by Labour’s National Executive Committee, and subsequently expelled from the party.

6) Rahman won election anyway as an independent, on a tiny turnout,after his (Muslim) Labour opponent was smeared as a wife-beater and enemy of Islam in thousands of newsletters produced with Rahman’s full knowledge. The new mayor was said by his campaign manager to have a “strategic relationship” with the IFE, with “most” of his campaigners being “either Respect or IFE activists.”

7) Even though Tower Hamlets is only 34 per cent Muslim, Rahman appointed a 100 per cent Bangladeshi and Muslim cabinet. He has never appointed any non-Muslim to any cabinet post and has no non-Muslim councillors.

8) Rahman has given control over the council’s finances to Alibor Choudhury, a former employee of an IFE front organisation with a long track record of encounters with the police. Rahman has himself taken personal control of all grants over £1000.

9) Under Rahman and Choudhury, council grants have been diverted away from secular bodies serving the whole community to IFE fronts and to other groups serving largely the Muslim community. Several of these groups, the council’s scrutiny committee found, are new and without any track record. Several appear to be based in people’s private homes. Several involve individuals with close personal connections to Rahman. (For a full account of Rahman’s Muslim grants favouritism, see here.)

10) Rahman has transferred valuable council properties to close personal associates at far less than their true market value, including a 10,000 square foot office building a stone’s throw from Canary Wharf which was sold for £875,000 to the man in charge of his election campaign website.

11) Key Rahman allies have been witnessed, and have not denied, engaging in a practice known as “vote-harvesting,”registering people for postal votes and then collecting their blank ballot papers.

12) Some of the supposed voters do not appear to exist. “Ghost” voters registered to empty properties or huge numbers of voters registered to small flats have been regular features of Tower Hamlets elections.

13) Rahman has presided over an atmosphere of menace and intimidation at council meetings. Phalanxes of Rahman supporters drafted in to the public galleries shout homophobic abuse at several key opponents of the mayor, who are gay. Rahman’s cabinet members, such as Alibor Choudhury, abuse their opponents as fascists.

14) Rahman has used council officers to hound and bully opposition councillors, spending tens of thousands of pounds of public money to make spurious, but time-consuming, legal attacks on them.

15) At council meetings, Rahman refuses to answer questions about any of these or most other issues, with officers saying that to do so would breach his human rights.

Read More

Although the Islamification of the UK was not the people’s choice, indirectly they are accountable for its implementation. It was our people’s choice at the Ballot Box who placed in charge the treacherous, treasonous criminals who are deliberately responsible for the painfully slow replacement of its indigenous people. Giving the people the benefit of the doubt the native Briton was perhaps genuinely naively complicit in their descent into a minority status.

I could show you pictures of the bomb damage around the East end of London and show you the Phoenix that rose from those ashes called Tower Hamlets. London landmarks like Peckham, Newham and towns like Oldham, Bradford and Peterborough also rose from the debris of our bombed out towns and cities and were reborn as foreign enclaves.

I was going to write about Manchester but decided not to bother, as one can select any one of a dozen English towns and cities and they would all look like a tourist snapshot taken anywhere in the Middle East or beyond. The people are the same, the only missing feature in the tourist snapshots are unpaved roads, cattle pulling ploughs, Holy Cows wandering the streets, open sewerage and people scavenging on rubbish heaps. The rest has been brought with them, child marriage, honour killing, acid attacks, Halal torture of animals, Female Genital mutilation, the common practise of marrying first cousins and much more.

A freeze frame of the Borough of Tower Hamlets in 2011 depicts a population of about 254,000 which includes one of the highest ethnic populations of Bangladeshi, which in turn has placed the “White British” in a minority status. The “White British” population are a sub group of 31.2% of the population. Bangladeshis make up 32% of the population of Tower Hamlets.

Another piece of news is that there are 21 active churches in Tower Hamlets affiliated with the Church of England, including also churches of many other Christian denominations. Although the “White English” are now a minority the really good news for the celebration of diversity coming out of Tower Hamlets is that there are now around 40 mosques including Islamic centres, I assume that includes Madrassas.

To explain diversity to a native of the Amazonian Forest, a Hottentot or Mud Person from Mt Hagen in New Guinea, it can be explained as thus. Diversity is a potpourri of primitive ‘Third World’ communities of differing cultures and standards of behaviour, some still practising medieval beliefs living within a host nation, an advanced society.

They live separate lives, even apart from other ethnic groups in their own tribal communities or ‘visible ethnic clusters’. They are particularly suspicious of the people of the host nation but they have to rely on them heavily as an economic life-raft or as a parasite might thrive as it feeds off its host. There are NO redeeming features of Multiculturalism, I repeat, for the ordinary Briton there are none.

I never ceased to be amazed and saddened at the frailties of human beings when I read of The Ukraine people wanting closer ties with the European Union. The carrot was a loan of 13 Billion Euros being offered from the World and European banks to rebuild its economy. Sound familiar? Spain, Greece and Ireland have also been there before. The people of the Ukraine should understand it is not AID as Russia have offered, it is a loan and has to be repaid or the Peoples Presidium in Brussels will institute austerity measures as Greece and Spain found to their horror.

I wish that were all but it is not. It would pay the Ukraine to look closely at the social nightmare affecting the rest of Europe, the race riots, the social fragmentation, particularly the incredibly high number of schools full of children of immigrants. Still sound attractive? Do you have a constitution? You are also going to have to exchange your constitution with the European constitution or Lisbon Treaty as it is called and open up your borders to the Third World as the other member countries have had to do.

I have saved the best part to the end; you will in a very short space of time be defined as an ethnic grouping called ‘White Ukrainian’. Your next door neighbour could well be a Pakistani Ukrainian or an Indian Ukrainian, Bangla, or even a Black Ukrainian. If you are part of the European Union no exemption will be made for you. As a Ukrainian you will be categorised into a sub grouping and your laws and general governance will be made in consultation by a consortium of 21 other countries that will decide your future.

To the good people of the Ukraine I would like to add a word of caution if I may. Looking over the EU wall to what appears on the surface as Peace, Western Freedom, Democracy and Prosperity which might appear attractive, things are never what they seem and there is no such thing as a free lunch.

You must be prepared in due course to lose your freedom of speech and expression, as a raft of cleverly designed laws enacted and emanating from Brussels purely to silence expressing your alarm and resentment as the Sub-Saharan immigrant hordes arrive in their hundreds of thousands and descend on your towns, cities and villages like Locusts, as we have experienced in the other occupied European countries. It might be better to stick with the devil you know rather than the devil you do not know. Welcome to our world.