The old woman who used to be attractive is confused why no one wants to look at her now that she’s sixty.

Decider:

Don’t expect to see Tom Cruise’s original Top Gun love interest in the sequel. According to Kelly McGillis, who played Charlie in the 1986 action drama, she was not asked to participate in the upcoming sequel Top Gun: Maverick, despite many of her co-stars appearing in the film. McGillis told ET that she doesn’t plan on attending any events for Top Gun: Maverick for a variety of reasons, not least because she has yet to be asked: “It hasn’t happened,” she said, adding, “I don’t really keep in touch with anybody.”

In 1986, McGillis broke out in a major way when she played Top Gun‘s Charlotte “Charlie” Blackwood, an astrophysicist and Topgun instructor. Cruise’s Maverick quickly falls for Charlie, and the film ends (spoilers ahead for a 30-year-old movie, I guess) with them reuniting at a bar near the base. After Top Gun, McGillis went on to star in a series of high-profile projects, including Made in Heaven, The Accused, and The Babe.

When asked if she plans on attending any red carpets or promotional events for Joseph Kosinski’s Top Gun: Maverick, McGillis was clear. “I don’t know how to answer that because one, it hasn’t happened,” the 62-year-old actress told ET. “Two, if and when it did happen, I would have to assess where I am, what I’m doing, what’s going on … I can’t project what I would or wouldn’t do in the future. I have no idea because I don’t know where I’ll be.”

Yeah, I wonder why they didn’t invite the female lead from a thirty-year-old movie to star in the sequel?

What does she look like now?

Oh no wait sorry, I posted the wrong picture. That’s the king of Africa.

Here’s what Kelly McGillis looks like now.

Yikes.

Except, not so many yikes, because everyone knew a woman would look like that at sixty.

Meanwhile, Tom Cruise at sixty – being a man – is just as handsome as he was at 30.

This is the main difference between men and women: women stop being fertile in their mid-thirties, so there is no longer any reason for them to be sexually attractive, because there is nothing sexual about them at that point. Men, on the other hand, are fertile until they die (more or less), so they remain sexually appealing into middle age and beyond.

People should really tell women about this issue. They should tell them that when they’re young, so they don’t waste their youth. Then they should tell them that when they’re old, so they don’t go around acting like they should be starring in movies when they’re sixty and embarrassing themselves and everyone else.

It’s not really fair to anyone that women are not told this.

If they were told straight up, “these are the facts of life, ladies – as soon as you turn 19, you’re on a clock and every day you’re alive men will be less interested in you than the day before,” they might make better decisions.

Tom Cruise surprised the Comic-Con audience this week with the trailer for his new film, a sequel to Top Gun.

AP:

Tom Cruise has made an unexpected flyby at San Diego Comic-Con to debut the first trailer for “Top Gun: Maverick.”

…

Cruise says all the flying in the trailer is real and that “Top Gun: Maverick” is a love letter to aviation. They worked with the Navy for the film, which is currently in production.

“Top Gun: Maverick” is expected to hit theaters next June. Val Kilmer, Jon Hamm and Miles Teller co-star.

Here’s the video.

Wait. Wrong link.

This one:

It’s basically Ed Harris talking to Tom Cruise.

Transcript below.

Thirty plus years of service.

Combat medals.

Citations.

Only man to shoot down three enemy planes in the last forty years.

Yet you can’t get a promotion.

You won’t retire.

And despite your best efforts, you refuse to die.

You should be at least a two-star admiral by now.

Yet here you are.

Captain.

Why is that?

— It’s one of life’s mysteries, sir.

The end is inevitable, Maverick. Your kind is headed for extinction.

— Maybe so, sir. But not today.

You may have involuntarily raised an eyebrow. In that case, you’re not alone.

Let’s take a closer look at the dialogue and write some notes.

Thirty plus years of service.

Combat medals.

Citations.

Only man to shoot down three enemy planes in the last forty years.

The first part of the dialogue sets the tone talking about Maverick’s achievements but it draws a parallel to white men as a whole, who have an exceptional track record yet are currently unappreciated and underrated, to say the least.

Yet you can’t get a promotion.

White men quite literally can’t get a promotion in our society, with all of these diversity quotas, equality ideas, reparations talks and other such nonsense.

You won’t retire.

And despite your best efforts, you refuse to die.

Racism, bigotry and self-preservation instincts still exist.

You should be at least a two-star admiral by now.

Yet here you are.

Captain.

We should be conquering the stars, but instead we’re using science to mutilate the genitals of insane people and witnessing our countries getting destroyed by brown hordes while we’re hated by those who suck our blood.

Why is that?

— It’s one of life’s mysteries, sir.

Yes, goy. It’s a mystery.

The end is inevitable, Maverick. Your kind is headed for extinction.

— Maybe so, sir. But not today.

That’s right, motherfucker. NO WHITE GENOCIDE TODAY.

TODAY WE FIGHT.

Unfortunately, by the looks of it, we may be fighting Iran or some random or made-up Middle Eastern country.

It’s hard to imagine people feeling any kind of connection with US military characters considering the United States is now acting like a deranged bully, trying to start wars that don’t really benefit anyone but Jews, using excuses that don’t really make sense.

War movies set in Current Year are a touchy subject, mostly because in Current Year, America is the bad guy (or, at least, the puppet of Israel the bad guys) and it is hard to achieve suspension of disbelief if the movie pretends otherwise.

Why would America be fighting ANYONE today?

There’s no real reason other than serving Jewish interests. It’s not in white people’s interests to fight Iran, China, Russia, North Korea, or anyone really.

We don’t even really have to fight Jews. We could if we wanted to, but just literally kicking them out would solve innumerable problems.

Considering the above, it’s clear that there’s no logical angle to this kind of movie. What there is is an emotional angle that aims to get the goyim to fight for their Jewish overlords with a smile on their faces.

It’s persuasion through the glorification of mindless war.

The good news is that if you really want to watch the movie, understanding the above can render the movie’s Jewing useless.

Sometimes you just want to watch some good pew pew pew.

If that’s the case, remember that bodycam footage is a thing.