Previously: Ana Kasparian Looks Like Joe Biden Now

Remember Tomi [sic] Lahren?

She was a leading figure of the “Bimbos for Trump” movement in 2016. She was a 22-year-old sex kitten purposefully done up to look like a porno film actress and heavily featured on Fox News as – wait for it – an expert commentator. She was then given her own show by “The Blaze.”

Just so you understand – I just want everyone to be perfectly clear about what was going on here – these are the kinds of photos she was posting on her social media in 2016:

You probably haven’t heard about her in a while, and that’s because she looks like a pile of dog shit.

You see, this is the problem with women. With the help of a lot of makeup, they are attractive when they are young, and then they stop being attractive rather rapidly. What’s worse, white women all end up looking like trannies. At least American white women. (If you do 15 minutes worth of research into what a “birth control pill” actually is, you’ll get your explanation for that one. That’s for another article.) Look at that face. No one wants to say it, but I’ll say it: I’ve seen trannies that looked better. If you had never seen that woman and I told you that was a tranny, you would not question it.

This “Tomi” bitch was the talk of the town. So much so that you half-expected that when you where leaving Chipolte, you’d see her pull up and get out of the back of a limo in a top hat twirling a cane like the Monopoly Man.

Now she’s nowhere and nothing. I only found out about her because I clicked on a Piers Morgan stream. He’s been doing a bit where he brings on D-list internet celebrities to yell at each other. It’s entertainment on about the same level as “The Naked Gun” films. The aged “Tomi” appeared with lispy rat “Destiny” and some much better looking old Filipina slut I did not recognize.

It’s no secret that old women look like shit and no one wants to have sex with them (save possibly the same sickos having sex with trannies, because it is literally the same thing).

This whole idea of bringing in 22-year-old porno sluts to comment on politics grotesque in a particularly American way.

I remember when rapper 50 Cent invented vitamin water. He said: “I’m taking vitamins, I’m drinking water – so why not put the vitamins in the motherfucking water?”

At first glance, this is the same logic as “men like watching porno, they like watching the news – so why not put porno women on the motherfucking news?”

But it’s not the same logic. This latter logic is more like a Palestinian saying “I like playing soccer, I like throwing rocks at Israeli tanks, so why not play soccer with a rock?”

You can’t just mix any two things together because you enjoy them both.

Just imagine the reverse: imagine they had pornos where the man is a Republican and the woman is a Democrat and they debate gun control as they rut. I would argue that this would actually make more sense and would be less viscerally offensive than having porno women on the news. Because, let’s be real here: the implication Fox News was making was “you can jack-off to this news show.” This was especially true when The Blaze gave her her own show, because then it was just: this woman, her tits, and the news.

Tomi [sic] Lahren was not a news reader. That would be one thing, but Fox News doesn’t even have that feature. She was (and based on my research, apparently still is) a “news commentator.”

I don’t want 22-year-old bimbos commenting on the news. A 22-year-old woman can’t even drive a car or cook pancakes. Why would anyone think I care about their opinions on politics?

I want 75-year-old men with distinguished professional careers commenting on my news.

Either that, or fat Irish retards.

This whole thing with women just has to stop.

It’s gone far enough.

Men should not be constantly baited into sexual arousal everywhere they turn. It’s not fair.

Men don’t really understand what is happening, because they don’t break it down to the basic level. They see a sexy woman, presenting herself in an available manner, and the chemicals in their brain turn on and the brain says: “yo bro, look – it’s an attractive woman and she’s presenting herself as sexually available.” The subconscious mind doesn’t understand what TV is, what the internet is, it doesn’t understand what billboards are. When you see sexy billboards, the subconscious mind believes an available woman is gazing at you, longingly. When you are watching a sexy woman on TV talking and giggling, the subconscious mind believes there is a woman in the room with you, presenting herself to you. The brain chemicals tell the subconscious mind: “Go, go, go! this is an open opportunity for reproduction, baby!”

However, living in a society like this, where sexual imagery is literally everywhere, you become desensitized to it. If a man from Afghanistan saw a 50-foot half naked woman on a billboard, he would immediately get an erection, because he isn’t used to seeing it. We are all so used to seeing it, that it is mundane, and just causes a kind of dull sexual frustration, which results in various psychological complexes.

Men should be calling for an end to women in public. It should be as obvious of an issue as immigration, gun rights, trannies, turbo diesel powered trucks, or any other issue that normal men tend to agree on. But no one talks about it because they were born into it and they don’t understand what is happening. Western believe that it simply the nature of reality that you are in a constant state of nagging sexual frustration.

I’m here to tell you, my dearest brothers: there is a better way.

In case you naively thought that your precious "conservative" women were immune to feminism… Tomi Lahren put out a 15 minute "PSA for Boyish Men" and spoiler alert: it's all your fault, guys. pic.twitter.com/D3mrWIPzJX

— Mack (@_Kenziepuff) August 5, 2020

“If all of these women including myself are having issues, then I have to think: it might not be us. It might be you. It might be men. It might be men. Now, I have often talked about the pussification of America, and how men are no longer men. I talked to my mom about this and she says, ‘well maybe it’s just the guys in Texas, maybe it’s just the guys in Los Angeles … it is not just the guys in Los Angeles, Nashville, Dallas, and they’re not any better in the Midwest. Quite frankly, I think they’re trash all over this country, in the age range from about 20 to I think about 55 or maybe even 60. A lot of men are trash, a lot of men don’t know how to treat women, don’t know, quite frankly, how to pull their heads out of the sand and pay attention, so I am going to help you. ” -Tomi Lahren, 2020, staying classy live from the lockdown on her slut cam

What exactly is the difference between “right-wing women” and normal women?

Well, probably, right-wing women are much worse. They’re engaged in politics, which is unnatural for women. A woman who is nominally left-wing – i.e., she just goes along with the establishment in total – is going to be unlikely to be as aggressively unhinged as a right-wing woman who thinks she knows something about whatever.

This recent video clip of right-wing pundit Tomi Lahren going on a rant about how all men are responsible for all of her problems is exhibit A. Theoretically, a normal woman would not outright say “all men are the problem,” as she would think that was too bitchy and bold, and she would be worried about people calling her a “vile cunt.” However, a right-wing woman thinks that she knows something, so she thinks that people calling her a “vile cunt” means that she’s winning.

The reality: women are not political. All they care about is themselves, so they cannot ever care about politics beyond how it affects them, or how it makes them feel. None of it has anything to do with processing information.

Ultimately, what makes them feel good is being a part of the group that has power, and enforcing the rules of the group. So, if she is a normal woman, involved in normal woman things such as university or a public workplace, she’s naturally going to be nominally Democrat. If instead she is surrounded by right-wingers, because her family is that way, she will be a Republican. That is, unless she wants to take a stand against her family in order to show strangers how good and moral she is due to something she’s seen on Facebook, in which case, she will turn against her family, attack them, and then post video of the event on TikTok.

Most of them are all deleted now (apparently, this was a bad look), but here’s one that still has a mirror up on YouTube:

The exception to all of the above is the right-wing pundit female (either as an e-celeb or a Tomi type real TV celeb), who realizes that with average looks, she can become famous in the right-wing, because the right-wing has absolutely no standards and thinks that some bitch with titties and “lunatic blonde” psycho hair saying their talking points is going to make black people vote for them (or make other women vote for them? Honestly, I don’t actually even understand the reasoning. I guess it probably brings clicks? Possibly).

The right-wing has a very high male-to-female ratio, so the bitch can be a queen. Kind of a “better to rule in hell” type deal. It’s the same thing as bitches who show up at Star Trek conventions.

As a right-wing media personality, all she is going to do is repeat things that she heard men say, except dumber. Like when a woman tries to make a joke. Once that bitch gets involved in this, she will get all high and mighty on her own supply and start acting like she knows something. Then she’ll come at you with some ultra-cunt bullshit like, “all my problems are the fault of all men.”

I’ve responded to this clip by sending Tomi Lahren a picture of my dick on WhatsApp. She gave me her WhatsApp number in an email when she told me, “I just want to get your opinions on things,” i.e., “I want to milk you for hot takes I can pretend are my own like I do with the 170 other notable male right-wing pundits I gave my phone number to.”

So far, what she has gotten from me is this:

• A 7-minute audio clip of me drunk, talking about the movie “Bloodshot” starring Vin Diesel
• 4 pictures of me with my shirt off, flexing
• A POV video clip of me shooting street junkies with a super-soaker
• 8 pictures of my dick, plus the most recent one
• 7 links to fight videos on WorldStarHipHop

She hasn’t responded to any of these messages, but so far she’s looked at all of them and has not blocked me.

Appendix

Here’s the full video from her Facebook page, if you’re interested in watching 15 minutes of some bimbo nagging you.

By the way, if you get off at that, and you masturbate to this video, you are extremely sick and you need to forgive your mother.

This is the frame she opens with:

Seriously, that is the face you see for the first four seconds of the video.

I will say that the one trad thing she does do is imply she dates men in their 5os. Although to be honest, I think basically all women in their twenties want to do that (as long as they can go out once a month and have sex with a random black guy) and are just held back by fear of social stigma, which, as explained above, she doesn’t really seem to be worried about because she thinks she knows something.

Also, I just wanted to say: I know we’ve been going easy on people because of the lockdown, and I don’t want to make it seem like I’m not doing that with her here, so whatever – consider this article pure humor, dismiss the whole thing as Lockdown Derangement Syndrome (LDS). I’ll give that to her, just as long as she apologizes for it when the lockdown ends and her full faculties are restored.

Oh.

Right.

Tomi Lahren is a legit bitch.

All she be care about is to get dat money, and she be gettin it, er’eyday.

And the Twitter retards will get her that money by whining about how she be gettin dat money.

RT:

Liberals are freaking out over conservative firebrand Tomi Lahren’s new ‘Freedom’ fashion line, designed for those who love

“God, Guns and Country” — but let’s be honest, lefties have been making fashion political for a long time
Lahren recently launched her line of yoga pants and workout tops with Alexo Athleticwear, prompting a social media meltdown.

The conservative pundit claims she has been pegged as “too controversial” to have her own fashion line — but who made the rule that only liberals get to make political statements with their sartorial choices?

"Freedom is a plain red tee. Freedom is also another one with no sleeves. And also star pants. Freedom is yacht-adjacent. Freedom is the poster for a comedy movie about five friends from Smith who take a trip together every year and all hate the blonde one." – Tomi Lahren pic.twitter.com/nAio59nhdR

— Ed Winstead (@eswinstead) August 23, 2019

The Twitterati also condemned Lahren for the “gun holsters” which were apparently designed into the pants — though, a quick glance at the Alexo websites clarifies that there are no gun holsters in Lahren’s leggings (that’s in contrast to the brand’s “Signature Carrywear” pants, which were indeed designed with gun-holstering in mind).

For every pair of yoga pants sold, Tomi Lahren gives a burlap sack to a caged child at the border.

— Susie Meister (@susie_meister) August 24, 2019

Promoting the workout gear, Lahren even said it was “important” that her line did not have a pocket for a gun because there “a lot of young people who aren’t ready to have a gun holster in their pants” — but that didn’t stop the alleged “gun pants” from taking over Twitter.

As someone who *actually* carried a gun — in service of our country, at all times — I can tell you that @tomilahren’s floppy-ass spandex “gun holsters” are unsafe, unsuitable for excercising, and just a fake way to look patriotic while profiting off the deaths of innocent people https://t.co/UWK1dTAExe

— Asha Rangappa (@AshaRangappa_) August 25, 2019

My advice to Tomi is: you go, girl.

People want to fuck you now, but in a few years, they won’t anymore.

That tight ass ain’t gonna last forever.

But you know what does last forever?

Money. 

Get that money, you dumb crooked bitch.