TIME Magazine has published a 7,000 word article entitled “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election,” effectively bragging about a concerted effort to undermine Donald Trump is the 2020 election.

“A weird thing happened right after the Nov. 3 election: nothing,” author Molly Ball begins. “As President Trump refused to concede, the response was not mass action but crickets. When media organizations called the race for Joe Biden on Nov. 7, jubilation broke out instead, as people thronged cities across the U.S. to celebrate the democratic process that resulted in Trump’s ouster.”

She continues to identify the “second odd thing” as that “corporate America turned on” President Trump.

“It was all very, very strange… Within days after the election, we witnessed an orchestrated effort to anoint the winner, even while many key states were still being counted,” she quotes Trump as saying on December 2.

“In a way, Trump was right,” Ball wrote. “There was a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes, one that both curtailed the protests and coordinated the resistance from CEOs. Both surprises were the result of an informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans. The pact was formalized in a terse, little-noticed joint statement of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and AFL-CIO published on Election Day. Both sides would come to see it as a sort of implicit bargain – inspired by the summer’s massive, sometimes destructive racial-justice protests – in which the forces of labor came together with the forces of capital to keep the peace and oppose Trump’s assault on democracy.”

“The scenario the shadow campaigners were desperate to stop was not a Trump victory,” Ball later claims. “It was an election so calamitous that no result could be discerned at all, a failure of the central act of democratic self-governance that has been a hallmark of America since its founding.

“Their work touched every aspect of the election. They got states to change voting systems and laws and helped secure hundreds of millions in public and private funding. They fended off voter-suppression lawsuits, recruited armies of poll workers and got millions of people to vote by mail for the first time. They successfully pressured social media companies to take a harder line against disinformation and used data-driven strategies to fight viral smears. They executed national public-awareness campaigns that helped Americans understand how the vote count would unfold over days or weeks, preventing Trump’s conspiracy theories and false claims of victory from getting more traction. After Election Day, they monitored every pressure point to ensure that Trump could not overturn the result.”

Ball explains that the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CFO) political director Mike Podhorzer was the “architect” of this scheme. She claims he worked in concert with “resistance” organizations.

“That’s why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream – a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information,” Ball writes. “They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it. And they believe the public needs to understand the system’s fragility in order to ensure that democracy in America endures.”

It’s basically a 7,000 word confession that the whole thing was rigged.

Many people on social media have noticed.

According to Time the election was “Fortified” but not rigged. Definitely not rigged. This is insanity, but everyone should read to learn exactly how bad it was. https://t.co/dPbXhvGGcx

— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) February 5, 2021

.@Time comes right out and admits it. https://t.co/mxXNf8l8HU pic.twitter.com/Quu5u0wEaw

— Lauren Boebert (@laurenboebert) February 5, 2021

Dear God, did they just validate what Trump was saying the whole time?? https://t.co/3BDyJaq8ov

— Brother Q. (ɔpɛ asem) (@andraydomise) February 5, 2021

So the election wasn't rigged. There was only a secret cabal of powerful elites and corporate interests that worked together to overhaul election laws, influence media coverage, and convince big tech to crush dissent. https://t.co/PLcG7yidNy

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) February 5, 2021

Turns out many of Trump’s “conspiracy theories” about how the country’s most powerful forces conspired to remove him were…true. https://t.co/rzdcNXhx27

— Blair Brandt (@BlairBrandt) February 5, 2021

If you had said this out loud on Twitter a few months ago, it would have gotten you banned. https://t.co/hub7XtzKfh

— Mark Hemingway (@Heminator) February 5, 2021

This is the media mocking you.

You can’t do anything about this.

And they think it’s funny.

They are humiliating you, laughing in your face.

I know you were dying to know who made TIME Magazine’s “Man of the Year” this year, because TIME Magazine is a very relevant cultural institution, a magazine that many men buy on the newsstand each week on their way home from a hard day’s work at the office. These men put their feet up on the stool in their smoking room, light up a cigar, and read the informative pages, as their merry wife cooks them a roast and their healthy white children scurry about by the fireplace.

That’s America for you. Land of dreams.

Bizarrely, this year it is two separate people: Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

It’s unclear why it wouldn’t just matter of factly be “Joe Biden,” without his accomplice, given that he is, according to TIME Magazine and the rest of the Jewish media, the single most popular person who ever lived on earth. He got 81 million votes.

This man is a titan of history and a behemoth of legend.

What does he need to have this woman attached onto him for? The office of vice president is completely irrelevant anyway, unless you’re Dick Cheney.

Is there some message they are sending us by referring to this duo as a single unit?

Is it like Master-Blaster from the Thunderdome?

If so, which one is Master and which one is Blaster?

Liberals are whining that TIME didn’t choose the sickening health worker scum that hoaxed the virus.

They even made their own fake cover they’re spamming on Twitter.

Should have been health care workers. pic.twitter.com/BsXmWe5Jiu

— The Honorable Peachy Dory (@sosaithi) December 11, 2020

I’m shocked and confused that liberals would be against having Biden on the cover, given in fact that he is the single most popular person who ever lived on earth in all of human history.

I did a little bit of research (i.e., scanned the Wikipedia page) and found that this is indeed the first time they’ve featured two people as a dual “person.”

To be fair, they have played fast and loose with the term “Man” (and from 1999 onward the more politically correct “person”). The first annual Man of the Year issue was published in 1927, featuring Charles Lindbergh; however, by 1950, they’d decided to go for a generalized form of a “man,” giving the cover to “The American Fighting Man” to honor American soldiers fighting in Korea.

Although the default has been to choose a “great man,” in 1956, they chose “The Hungarian freedom fighter,” and in 1969, “The Middle American.”

In 2016, they chose “You,” referring to YouTube personalities and others who create internet content. The cover read: “Yes, you. You control the information age. Welcome to your world.”

Obviously, that hasn’t aged well.

I actually like the original concept of the Man of the Year, which was based on the “Great Men” Theory of History, which is that history is shaped by great men. The goal is to choose the most consequential figure of the year. It is not intended to be a popularity contest, or political propaganda. But of course, the editorship changes hands.

Last year, Greta Thunberg won the cover, and as I said at the time, I think that was a good call.

Making it Joe Biden, let alone “Joe and His Colorful Female Sidekick,” is actually just gross and obviously wrong.

This year, my shortlist would have been:

• Anthony Fauci
• Jeff Zucker
• Xi Jinping
• Tucker Carlson
• William Barr

Fauci was without question the face of 2020, Zucker shaped the entire narrative of our society, Xi is the person who has framed the entire geopolitical paradigm by refusing to bow to Western pressure, and Carlson is singularly responsible for preventing an all-out uprising against this election fraud.

Ultimately, I would have without hesitancy chosen William Barr.

He is the single reason that every consequential event of 2020 happened:

• He is responsible for the entire Jeffrey Epstein episode
• He is responsible for allowing the unconstitutional coronavirus lockdowns
• He is responsible for allowing the Black Lives Matter Marxist uprising, and
• He is the person responsible for Joe Biden ostensibly winning the 2020 presidential election

William Barr is arguably the most consequential individual of the last century. It is difficult to imagine that any man, including even Adolf Hitler or Joseph Stalin, singlehandedly changed history to the extent that he has.

If we were breaking it down in hard terms, I ultimately would say that Hitler, Stalin and Mao Zedong were more consequential, given that Barr is simply acting as an agent of a much larger agenda, whereas those three figures acted very much on their own will. But the efficiency with which Barr has acted on an agenda is truly staggering.

It remains amazing to me that I remain the single person sitting here saying this. History will say it. There is a prideful part of me that hopes that history will also note that I was the only one saying it while it was happening. But I’m doing my best to get over that.

I’ve never done this before, but I’m going to go ahead and call 2021’s Man of the Year:

We’re not going down without a fight.

“As we looked at the choices, it became clear that the manipulation and abuse of truth is really the common thread in so many of this year’s major stories.” TIME Editor-in-Chief @efelsenthal explains the decision for choosing the Guardians as 2018 Person of the Year pic.twitter.com/SzBmb8R41x

— TODAY (@TODAYshow) December 11, 2018

They didn’t actually elect Jamal Khashoggi specifically as “man of the year.” He’s the one in the headlines, but they apparently elected “journalists, generally.”

They changed “man” to “person” a while ago, now it is always groups of people. Last year it was the metoo skanks.

TIME Magazine is such a piece of shit. No one reads it, like no one watches the Oscars, but the “man/person/group of the year” is still considered culturally relevant for historical reasons.

Washington Post:

Time magazine has announced its 2018 Person of the Year is “The Guardians,” four individuals and one group — all journalists — who this year helped expose “the manipulation and the abuse of truth” around the world.

They are the journalist Jamal Khashoggi, the Washington Post contributing columnist who was killed inside Saudi Arabia’s consulate in Istanbul in October; the staff of the Capital Gazette newspaper in Maryland; journalist Maria Ressa, the CEO of the Rappler news website, who has been made a legal target in the Philippines; and journalists Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo, who have been jailed in Myanmar for nearly a year for their work exposing the mass killing of Rohingya Muslims.

“As we looked at the choices, it became clear that the manipulation and the abuse of truth is really the common thread in so many of this year’s major stories, from Russia to Riyadh to Silicon Valley,” Time magazine editor Edward Felsenthal said on the “Today” show Tuesday morning, where the announcement was made.

Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III, who is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election, was third and President Trump was runner-up, Felsenthal said.

“There’s always a strong case for the president of the United States, particularly this president,” Felsenthal said.

Yeah, okay.

I sort of understand this, in light of last year’s “group” – all four of those journalists share the thing in common that they are oppressed/repressed. Although none of them was really a big deal other than Khashoggi. I honestly didn’t even remember the Filipino bitch, and no one cared about those Reuters Burmese.

It obviously should have been either Mueller or Trump, as those were clearly the two most influential individuals of current year (note that this is what it is supposed to be: the person who had the biggest effect on the year, not someone they like, necessarily).

But they chose to push something that matters to them as journalists.

This again shows that journalists are a priest class, that compulsively sticks together and defends one another. I wrote a thing about that a while ago, which I think was good and is relevant here.

They don’t actually care about the truth, obviously. Moreover, they don’t really care about anything specific. Khashoggi was an agent of the Moslem Brotherhood, which I doubt most Jews/journalists support, generally. His WaPo columns – and there were not very many of them – all argued that every Moslem country was naturally Islamic, so if you want to give them democracy, you have to accept that they will vote for Islamic politicians who will impose Sharia law. Most journalists, if asked, I would assume do not agree with this particular contention.

I don’t really even understand why he was writing for WaPo.

“I’ll raise your herp two derps.” -Jamal Khashoggi

But they will all defend each other, no matter what. They view themselves, creepily, as the deciders of reality. A special group that deserves special privileges. “A priest class” really is the best way to communicate the image they have of themselves, and as you can see with this TIME decision, they view themselves as a global phenomenon.

The Burmese and the Flip chick are fighting anti-Islamic Buddhists and Duterte, respectively. These are clear enemies of the Jews. But Khashoggi was fighting Saudi Arabia, a great ally of the Jews. Obviously, they were able to flip this and make it about Donald Trump, but now they’re trying to cut off money to Saudi – money that is effectively going to Israel.

Again, I want to say that President Trump should have and still should simply cut Saudi off. There is no reason for him to keep going to bat for Israel when it is 100% clear that this does not help him in anyway. In defending Saudi, he is literally defending the Jews against the Jews. It makes absolutely no sense.

In reporting this TIME cover, WaPo took the time to attack Trump, including this tweet in their piece:

TRUMP closes by saying this about Time Person of the Year: "I can't imagine anybody else other than Trump. Can you imagine anybody else other than Trump? Have a good time, everybody. Thank you." pic.twitter.com/M8XVyZO4LI

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) November 20, 2018

That is a Jew from Vox.

Funnily enough, Jamal’s uncle, the infamous billionaire arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi, was once on the cover of TIME.

That was from January of 1987, back when they were still considered a respectable publication to flip through in the lobby of the dentist’s office.

Now, they’ve basically gone the same way as Newsweek – they’ve become a shitty clickbait website that attempts to compete with Buzzfeed. They fail, like Newsweek fails.

Look at how much their traffic has dropped in the last year:

For comparison, Newsweek:

Breitbart is burying both of them:

For further reference, here’s Infowars:

My broke ass would probably be ranking higher than Newsweek if they hadn’t stolen my domain. If I had payment processing and access to the rest of the mainstream services, we’d be in the top 500 (somewhere around Breitbart). No joke. Right-wing ideas are a lot more popular than left-wing ideas, especially among people who read the news.

The only legacy media that is really relevant is:

1. New York Times
2. CNN
3. Washington Post
4. The Guardian

In that order.

And those have only held on because they’ve had so much money poured into them.

There is nobody more deserving of TIME Magazine’s 2018 “Man of the Year” award than Gritty. Referred to by his enemies as the “Orange Terror,” he has fundamentally transformed our society for the better through his political advocacy of racial genocide and Holocausts.

The Alt-Right icon Gritty is seeking to follow in the footsteps of his personal hero Adolf Hitler. As many of you know, Hitler was selected as TIME Magazine’s 1938 “Man of the Year.” He was also featured on subsequent TIME Magazine covers.

It is only fitting that 80-years later, Gritty has declared to TIME Magazine that he should be the 2018 “Man of the Year.”

pic.twitter.com/19JE2hO7qy

— Gritty (@GrittyNHL) November 20, 2018

His declaration has already attracted local news coverage in the Philadelphia area.

For some reason, these local news reporters think his declaration is some type of joke. Well, Gritty doesn’t do jokes. Gritty is as serious as they come.

Did they think he was joking when he burned that cross with the KKK?

Or when he threw this faggot off of a roof top?

Or when he smashed and gassed Anne Frank?

No, these are not jokes. The fact of the matter is that Gritty has accomplished much in 2018. Certainly far more than any of the other 2018 “Man of the Year” nominees.

Not only did Gritty secure his position as the beloved mascot for the Philadelphia Flyers hockey team, but he has indoctrinated millions of young Whites into hating kikes and niggers. And it only took him a few short months to accomplish these things.

Gritty’s profound impact on the world in such a short period of time can not be understated. That is why he absolutely deserves to be TIME Magazine’s 2018 “Man of the Year.”

It’s almost as if the Jewish people have complete control of the American media, entirely.

I hope they don’t use this total control irresponsibly.

Daily Mail:

Time Magazine is being sold by Meredith Corp. to Marc Benioff, a co-founder of Salesforce, and his wife, it was announced Sunday.

Meredith announced that it was selling Time magazine for $190million in cash to Benioff, one of four co-founders of Salesforce, a cloud computing pioneer.

Meredith had completed the purchase of Time along with other publications of Time Inc. earlier this year.

The Benioffs are purchasing Time personally, and the transaction is unrelated to Salesforce.com, where Benioff is chairman and co-CEO and co-founder.

The announcement by Meredith said that the Benioffs would not be involved in the day-to-day operations or journalistic decisions at Time.

I suppose we can probably trust them.

After all, they are God’s Chosen People.

Maybe TIME Magazine will become MORE honest with a different Jew in charge.

You know that “iconic” photo of the crying little spiclet that TIME featured on their cover condemning Trump as a bad bad bad bad evil Hitler racist monster?

Yeah, that was a hoax.

That little spiclet was never separated from her fambly.

It’s just more fake news.

Fox News:

A little girl shown in a viral photo crying as a U.S. Border Patrol agent detained her mother – and used by TIME magazine to symbolize the Trump administration’s family separation policy – reportedly was never separated from her mom.

“Welcome to America,” declared a somber TIME cover, which showed the picture of the Honduran child Yanela Sanchez next to a towering President Trump.

TIME, which is standing by the cover despite the new information, originally called it “an image America could not ignore” and interviewed the photographer, as did other outlets. TIME followed up with another article entirely about the cover and “the story behind” it.

TIME’s new cover: A reckoning after Trump's border separation policy: What kind of country are we? https://t.co/U4Uf8bffoR pic.twitter.com/sBCMdHuPGc

— TIME (@TIME) June 21, 2018

The picture was featured in international coverage of the policy around the world. The New York Daily News also put Sanchez on the cover of its June 16 issue with the headline: “Callous. Soulless. Craven. Trump.”

Wow. What a powerful and heartbreaking front page.

'A 2-year-old Honduran girl cries as her mother is detained near the Mexican border in McAllen, Texas.' pic.twitter.com/FAjDWN0FCc

— Nooruddean (@BeardedGenius) June 16, 2018

CNN analyst Chris Cillizza wrote an entire article on the TIME cover: “It shows the compassion gap that exists between the Trump administration’s ‘zero-tolerance’ border policy and the real-life people that are affected.”

But multiple outlets interviewed the father of the girl behind the iconic image, and he said he had learned that his two-year-old daughter was detained with her mother at a facility in Texas, and the two were not separated at all. The Honduran government confirmed his version of events to Reuters.

The Washington Post reported that the mother, Sandra Sanchez, had previously been deported in 2013 to Honduras. Her husband told the Post that she left without telling him she was taking Yanela with her and couldn’t contact her. But then he saw the picture on the news.

“You can imagine how I felt when I saw that photo of my daughter. It broke my heart. It’s difficult as a father to see that, but I know now that they are not in danger. They are safer now than when they were making that journey to the border,” Denis Javier Varela Hernandez told The Daily Mail.

He also said he did not support his wife’s decision to make the perilous trek to the U.S. and that they have three other children together.

“I didn’t support it. I asked her, why? Why would she want to put our little girl through that? But it was her decision at the end of the day.” 

WOW, no Mestizo Sharia in Honduras, huh?

But this is really the story of virtually all of these poor innocent brown victims, whether it is in America or Europe – they all have family members begging them not to leave, but the idea of free everything is just too big of a temptation.

But despite the dad’s explanation, TIME stood by its cover in a statement Friday.

“The June 12 photograph of the 2-year-old Honduran girl became the most visible symbol of the ongoing immigration debate in America for a reason: Under the policy enforced by the administration, prior to its reversal this week, those who crossed the border illegally were criminally prosecuted, which in turn resulted in the separation of children and parents,” TIME editor-in-chief Edward Felsenthal said. “Our cover and our reporting capture the stakes of this moment.”

Literally “real in my mind.”

These people. Man. Wow.

Yet, in its story about the photo, TIME included the following correction: “The original version of this story misstated what happened to the girl in the photo after she taken from the scene. The girl was not carried away screaming by U.S. Border Patrol agents; her mother picked her up and the two were taken away together.“

A B S O L U T E L Y F A K E N E W S

They knew it was fake when they published it.

They just didn’t expect to get caught.

Because whatever – they all look alike, right?

Obviously, there are I’m sure a lot of pictures of children who did get separated from their parents – but they weren’t as evocative as the hoax one. So they went with the hoax one.

I wonder if… now I’m wondering if Beach Boy was just taking a nap on the beach, all tuckered out from his ride across the Mediterranean.

The way the Jewish media just lies in the most callous, manipulative ways imaginable really does put you in a position where it just feels ridiculous to take anything they say seriously.

But fake news or not – we’ll always have the memes.

BONUS MEME COLLECTION

inb4 Time magazine rocked by “sexual harassment culture” scandal.

Think we’re being hit by an intense wave of grabbing allegations? You ain’t seen nothing yet.

The thing that set off these Hollywood sluts was the feeling that it was “safe” to do so, and that they would get sympathy and support instead of public scorn like in the past. That’s the very essence of MeTooism – getting social accolades for accusing kikes of grabbing you.

Now, these women are not only accepted and supported, but raised up as veritable heroes before the public. If we were ever at risk of slipping back into the old status-quo, then this Times Magazine feature has cemented the new paradigm for years to come. The fate of all these media Jews has been sealed.

Today:

TIME has named the Silence Breakers, the individuals who set off a national reckoning over the prevalence of sexual harassment, as its 2017 Person of the Year.

The magazine’s editor-in-chief Edward Felsenthal revealed the selection Wednesday on TODAY along with the cover, a composite group photo that includes actress Ashley Judd, singer Taylor Swift, former Uber engineer Susan Fowler and a woman whose face cannot be seen.

“The galvanizing actions of the women on our cover … along with those of hundreds of others, and of many men as well, have unleashed one of the highest-velocity shifts in our culture since the 1960s,” Felsenthal said in a statement.

Yes.

And what is that shift, exactly? How have the standards changed? Was “sexual harassment” tolerated before? Of course not. The old “standard” was that straight White males can have their lives destroyed instantly, at any time, based on the arbitrary feelings of any female they’ve ever met who regretted any part of their interaction. That hasn’t changed.

What’s changed is that now this same standard has been enlarged to target powerful Jews, Blacks, famous celebrities and liberal icons, who used to be immune to this sort of stuff. Women who accused members of the “liberal coalition” would be shamed as traitors. Not anymore.

This social transformation actually signals the disintegration of the “coalition of the ascendant” – not some new frontier in social justice.

And it’s a beautiful thing.

There’s a reason why #MeTooism has a 100% endorsement rate among the Alt-Right.

The Silence Breakers emerged amid burgeoning allegations of sexual misconduct and assault by film executive Harvey Weinstein. As his list of accusers swelled, so did the number of people who spoke up to expose dozens of other famous individuals in Hollywood, politics, journalism and other industries as sexual predators.

Actor Kevin Spacey, journalist Charlie Rose, comedian Louis CK and U.S. Sen. Al Franken of Minnesota were among the high-profile names snared in an ever-growing web of alleged sexual harassers. Last week, former TODAY anchor Matt Lauer was also accused of sexual misconduct.

The women, and men, who broke their silence to share their stories of victimization gave traction to the #MeToo campaign, which took off on social media and fueled a worldwide discussion on just how endemic sexual harassment has been.

MeTooism is here to stay. It seems like either a large swath of the establishment doesn’t understand where all this is going, or they think this somehow strengthens their position. These people are not too clever.

The reality is that powerful men grabbing hoes is a natural and predictable consequence of the sexual liberation and of bringing women into the workplace. And long-term, the only possible solution to that problem is patriarchy – or complete societal collapse, if women are just put in charge of everything.

Under patriarchy, women don’t get molested by men – because they’re at home taking care of kids by the time they’re 18, and their husbands don’t tolerate them being in the company of strange men.

Well.

We made the cover of TIME Magazine.

It’s a shame no one reads magazines anymore.

(((Joel Stein))) covers several different types of trolls in his several thousand word piece, but the focus is on Alt-Right trolls – with not-so-subtle suggestions that “something must be done about these goyim,” whether it be through new laws or further censorship.

Joel Stein, untalented super-Jew

You might remember Stein from a now infamous piece he did in the LA Times, entitled “Who Runs Hollywood? C’mon,” where he explained that Hollywood and the rest of the media is run by Jews and anyone who denies it is denying the greatness of Jews. He was attacked by the ADL for this, who claim that “Jews don’t run Hollywood,” but “the people who run Hollywood happen to be Jewish.”

Surprisingly, there is little mention of Jews in this troll article, save in weev’s bit.

TIME:

Trolling has become the main tool of the alt-right, an Internet-grown reactionary movement that works for men’s rights and against immigration and may have used the computer from Weird Science to fabricate Donald Trump. Not only does Trump share their attitudes, but he’s got mad trolling skills: he doxxed Republican primary opponent Senator Lindsey Graham by giving out his cell-phone number on TV and indirectly got his Twitter followers to attack GOP political strategist Cheri Jacobus so severely that her lawyers sent him a cease-and-desist order.

The alt-right’s favorite insult is to call men who don’t hate feminism “cucks,” as in “cuckold.” Republicans who don’t like Trump are “cuckservatives.” Men who don’t see how feminists are secretly controlling them haven’t “taken the red pill,” a reference to the truth-revealing drug in The Matrix. They derisively call their adversaries “social-justice warriors” and believe that liberal interest groups purposely exploit their weakness to gain pity, which allows them to control the levers of power. Trolling is the alt-right’s version of political activism, and its ranks view any attempt to take it away as a denial of democracy.

In this new culture war, the battle isn’t just over homosexuality, abortion, rap lyrics, drugs or how to greet people at Christmastime. It’s expanded to anything and everything: video games, clothing ads, even remaking a mediocre comedy from the 1980s. In July, trolls who had long been furious that the 2016 reboot of Ghostbusters starred four women instead of men harassed the film’s black co-star Leslie Jones so badly on Twitter with racist and sexist threats–including a widely copied photo of her at the film’s premiere that someone splattered semen on–that she considered quitting the service. “I was in my apartment by myself, and I felt trapped,” Jones says.

…

Because of Jones’ harassment, alt-right leader Milo Yiannopoulos was permanently banned from Twitter.

Oh, weird.

This Jewish journalist is promoting another Jew as the head of the Nazi movement.

I wonder why?

The service said Yiannopoulos, a critic of the new Ghostbusters who called Jones a “black dude” in a tweet, marshaled many of his more than 300,000 followers to harass her. He not only denies this but says being responsible for your fans is a ridiculous standard.

…

A gay, 31-year-old Brit with frosted hair, Yiannopoulos has been speaking at college campuses on his Dangerous Faggot tour.

“Brit” – no mention of his Jewishness.

I wonder why?

He says trolling is a direct response to being told by the left what not to say and what kinds of video games not to play. “Human nature has a need for mischief. We want to thumb our nose at authority and be individuals,” he says. “Trump might not win this election. I might not turn into the media figure I want to. But the space we’re making for others to be bolder in their speech is some of the most important work being done today. The trolls are the only people telling the truth.”

Except that you are a lying kike, as I have demonstrated explicitly (here also). Among his lies is that we are not “actual bigots,” that we don’t really hate Jews and that we are okay with race-mixing. He basically claims everything we say is just a big joke to piss people off for no reason.

“The leader of the Nazis is a homosexual Jew who is obsessed with Black dick.” -TIME Magazine Jew Joel Stein

Even Matt Lewis admitted that Milo is trying to steal my narrative, kike.

The alt-right was galvanized by Gamergate, a 2014 controversy in which trolls tried to drive critics of misogyny in video games away from their virtual man cave.

…

Andrew Auernheimer, who calls himself Weev online, is probably the biggest troll in history. He served just over a year in prison for identity fraud and conspiracy. When he was released in 2014, he left the U.S., mostly bouncing around Eastern Europe and the Middle East. Since then he has worked to post anti–Planned Parenthood videos and flooded thousands of university printers in America with instructions to print swastikas–a symbol tattooed on his chest.

No mention of what the flier was advertising.

In fact, The Daily Stormer isn’t mentioned by name at all in this article, which fuels speculation that the Learned Elders of the ADL council has declared a media ban on speaking our name.

Milo, for his part, does not have an ADL council organized against him.

When I asked if I could fly out and interview him, he agreed, though he warned that he “might not be coming ashore for a while, but we can probably pass close enough to land to have you meet us somewhere in the Adriatic or Ionian.” His email signature: “Eternally your servant in the escalation of entropy and eschaton.”

While we planned my trip to “a pretty remote location,” he told me that he no longer does interviews for free and that his rate was two bitcoins (about $1,100) per hour. That’s when one of us started trolling the other, though I’m not sure which:

From: Joel Stein

To: Andrew Auernheimer

I totally understand your position. But TIME, and all the major media outlets, won’t pay people who we interview. There’s a bunch of reasons for that, but I’m sure you know them.

Thanks anyway,

Joel

From: Andrew Auernheimer

To: Joel Stein

I find it hilarious that after your people have stolen years of my life at gunpoint and bulldozed my home, you still expect me to work for free in your interests.

You people belong in a f-cking oven.

From: Joel Stein

To: Andrew Auernheimer

For a guy who doesn’t want to be interviewed for free, you’re giving me a lot of good quotes!

In a later blog post about our emails, Weev clarified that TIME is “trying to destroy white civilization” and that we should “open up your Jew wallets and dump out some of the f-cking geld you’ve stolen from us goys, because what other incentive could I possibly have to work with your poisonous publication?” I found it comforting that the rate for a neo-Nazi to compromise his ideology is just two bitcoins.

That doesn’t even make any sense, you cheap-ass Jew rat.

The point is that doing Jew articles are a waste of time. I don’t do interviews either, because basically to go and meet some Jew and talk to him would take nearly an entire day of my life – why would anyone do that for free? I already have my own media outlet, and I have been linked on mainstream Jewish news sites and never gotten a detectable rise in traffic from it.

I have adopted the weev method of telling them to pay me.

(Unless they are Rolling Stone, and agree to put me on the cover in the Bane mask.)

Expressing socially unacceptable views like Weev’s is becoming more socially acceptable.

It is becoming more acceptable by the second.

And there is no point in the future where it could start to become less acceptable.

Feels bad, huh kike?

Sure, just like there are tiny, weird bookstores where you can buy neo-Nazi pamphlets, there are also tiny, weird white-supremacist sites on the web.

The Daily Stormer – the world’s premiere (and most visited) neo-Nazi, Alt-Right and White Supremacist website is neither tiny nor weird, Jew.

But some of the contributors on those sites now go to places like 8chan or 4chan, which have a more diverse crowd of meme creators, gamers, anime lovers and porn enthusiasts. Once accepted there, they move on to Reddit, the ninth most visited site in the U.S., on which users can post links to online articles and comment on them anonymously.

This isn’t really accurate.

This article, generally, is not even close to Buzzfeed quality.

The actual history is that the hivemind of 4chan created modern trolling and neo-Nazism, and that the top Alt-Right sites, this one and TRS, were mainly inspired by 4chan.

When sites are overrun by trolls, they drown out the voices of women, ethnic and religious minorities, gays–anyone who might feel vulnerable. Young people in these groups assume trolling is a normal part of life online and therefore self-censor. An anonymous poll of the writers at TIME found that 80% had avoided discussing a particular topic because they feared the online response. The same percentage consider online harassment a regular part of their jobs. Nearly half the women on staff have considered quitting journalism because of hatred they’ve faced online, although none of the men had. Their comments included “I’ve been raged at with religious slurs, had people track down my parents and call them at home, had my body parts inquired about.” Another wrote, “I’ve had the usual online trolls call me horrible names and say I am biased and stupid and deserve to be raped. I don’t think men realize how normal that is for women on the Internet.”

Hey dumb sluts – you know where there are no trolls?

The kitchen.

It’s also the place where you will feel most rewarded by life. It’s six million times more satisfying than pretending to be a man then being constantly shocked and surprised that everyone is saying you deserve to be raped. .

The alt-right argues that if you can’t handle opprobrium, you should just turn off your computer. But that’s arguing against self-expression, something antithetical to the original values of the Internet.

Trolling is self-expression. Obviously.

So one persons self-expression hurts other people’s feelings so then it is a form of self-expression which goes against other self-expression?

The obvious conclusion of this line of thinking would be that the only people who should be allowed on the internet are people who agree with everyone else on the internet, which I don’t think was one of the original values of the internet.

Kike.

But even those in the alt-right who claim they are “unf-ckwithable” aren’t really. At some point, everyone, no matter how desensitized by their online experience, is liable to get freaked out by a big enough or cruel enough threat. Still, people have vastly different levels of sensitivity. A white male journalist who covers the Middle East might blow off death threats, but a teenage blogger might not be prepared to be told to kill herself because of her “disgusting acne.”

…

Troll culture might be affecting the way nontrolls treat one another. A yet-to-be-published study by University of California, Irvine, professor Zeev Kain showed that when people were exposed to reports of good deeds on Facebook, they were 10% more likely to report doing good deeds that day. But the opposite is likely occurring as well. “One can see discourse norms shifting online, and they’re probably linked to behavior norms,” says Susan Benesch, founder of the Dangerous Speech Project and faculty associate at Harvard’s Internet and Society center. “When people think it’s increasingly O.K. to describe a group of people as subhuman or vermin, those same people are likely to think that it’s O.K. to hurt those people.”

You caught us!

When we finally get these gas chambers fired-up, everyone on the internet is going to be like “lol it’s about time roflmao.”

Because they’ve been psychologically reprogrammed by Nazi trolls.

As more trolling occurs, many victims are finding laws insufficient and local police untrained. “Where we run into the problem is the social-media platforms are very hesitant to step on someone’s First Amendment rights,” says Mike Bires, a senior police officer in Southern California who co-founded LawEnforcement.social, a tool for cops to fight on-line crime and use social media to work with their communities. “If they feel like someone’s life is in danger, Twitter and Snapchat are very receptive. But when it comes to someone harassing you online, getting the social-media companies to act can be very frustrating.” Until police are fully caught up, he recommends that victims go to the officer who runs the force’s social-media department.

He is encouraging people to waste police time by calling them when they have hurt feelings?

This isn’t England, you faggot.

In America, it is legal to hurt people’s feelings on the internet.

In 2005, after Emily May co-founded Hollaback!, which posts photos of men who harass women on the street in order to shame them (some might call this trolling), she got a torrent of misogynistic messages. “At first, I thought it was funny. We were making enough impact that these losers were spending their time calling us ‘cunts’ and ‘whores’ and ‘carpet munchers,’” she says. “Long-term exposure to it, though, I found myself not being so active on Twitter and being cautious about what I was saying online. It’s still harassment in public space. It’s just the Internet instead of the street.”

That’s pretty much the end of the Alt-Right related part of the article.

He rambles on and on and on to finish his needed coverstory wordcount.

The whole thing though really just confirms how effective we’ve become – despite his lack of mentioning the Jew issue, we know that’s what it’s about. Why they are whining about trolling, putting it on the cover of TIME.

It’s a build-up for an attempt to shut it down.

And if The Leader doesn’t win, Hillary is going to try to shut it down.

But we shall prevail, whatever comes our way.

The Daily Stormer will live forever.

Good job to all the trolls out there who have made our movement so successful.

And if you’re not active in the trolling community, you should join our bbs and get active.

We be on the job everday, muffugguh.

Here’s Joel Stein’s Twitter, just in case you want to share your thoughts on this article with him.

@thejoelstein

The world’s top terrorist-enabler, the Beast who is Destroyer of Nations, Angela Merkel, has won Time Magazine’s “Person of the Year” (formerly “Man of the Year”).

Though I and most of the rest of the free (non-Moslem) world hate Angela Merkel with a deep passion, she probably deserved the title. Because this title is not awarded to the “best” person, but to the most influential. And it would be hard to find a single individual in history who has been more influential than Angela Merkel.

This woman has, single-handedly, reshaped the entire landscape of the European continent by unilaterally acting to facilitate the invasion of Europe by millions (actually millions) of people from a corrosive culture. This act was made possible only in this age of technology, but nonetheless, it is incomparable to any other act ever in the history of the world.

The result of this act will be open race war on the streets of Europe. That is entirely inevitable at this point. And in fact, this race war has already begun.

The Anti-Merkel

The other viable candidate for “Person of the Year” was Donald Trump, who is in many ways the diametric opposite of Angela Merkel.

I told you @TIME Magazine would never pick me as person of the year despite being the big favorite They picked person who is ruining Germany

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 9, 2015

Merkel is a force of death, a bringer of destruction. She has unleashed hell.

Trump, on the other hand, represents regeneration and a chance at redemption for the lost tribes of Europa. He is a creative force. Regardless of what happens with his Presidential candidacy, he is opening up the realm of Western thought to the idea that we, as European men, not only have a right to exist (a proposal Merkel flatly denies), but indeed, that we have a right to be glorious (a thought that will get you arrested in Merkel’s Germany).

The Future Does Not Exist Yet

We must remember that the future remains unwritten.

Merkel and Trump are symbols of potential futures. The White race is at a crossroads. We can destroy ourselves with guilt and shame, or we can be reborn as the phoenix, dig ourselves out of this grave, and rise like fire to become what we were always destined to become.

The choice is ours. No one will make it for us.

Go vote, and spam this everywhere.

This will be a big deal in the minds of the masses. It will help negate this “not a real candidate” gibberish being pushed on Republicans who think they are smarter than they actually are by Jews who actually are smarter than them.

You have to use Twitter or Facebook to vote, but presumably people have those.

HERE’S THE LINK GO FORTH AND SPAM IT.

The time is now – for Trump.