Ubisoft is reporting Gamers to the police for politically incorrect jokes.

We lost #Gamergate and now Gamers are being treated like the Germans after they lost World War II.

Gamers are a broken nation occupied by a hostile foreign force. pic.twitter.com/msXZ6RBHb4

— Andrew Anglin (@WorldWarWang) February 8, 2023

Ubisoft really do just do every possible thing you could imagine against the gamers.

Now they’re helping to send the gamers to prison for joke?

Ubisoft hates the gamers. The gamers should be rising up against them.

Stop buying these games! They’re not even good! The Sony open world model (God of War, Spider-Man, Days Gone) is much better just from an enjoyability perspective, and the Japs do not hate you like Ubisoft hates you.

BBC:

Rape jokes, racism, bullying – if you’ve picked up a controller, or scrolled a mouse, to dabble in some online gaming then you’ve likely come across plenty.

The gaming industry, like others where people interact online, has been trying to figure out how to get to grips with behaviour like this for years.

Ubisoft, makers of major franchises like Assassin’s Creed and Rainbow Six, has now signed a first-of-its-kind deal with police to try and tackle the issue for its players.

The hope is for this agreement to start a conversation within the industry and see others follow suit.

Online gaming is a joyful experience for millions of people every day.

No it isn’t.

It’s a space where friendships are forged and memorable experienced shared. During the pandemic online games were a saviour for many people’s mental health. However its dark side is also plain to see. Abusive behaviour, deaths threats and grooming – can be found in online gaming spaces.

“We want to be on the right side of history,” says Damien Glorieux a senior director of the Newcastle-based Ubisoft Customer Relationship Centre.

It’s too much!

They’ve gone too far this time!

They crossed the line!

It’s here, and at four other locations around the world, that staff monitor how players of Ubisoft games are getting on – responding to requests for help and actively getting involved with the communities that have evolved around their titles. They deal with everything from purchasing issues to online toxicity.

Other companies have similar set-ups, but what’s unique here is the involvement of local law enforcement.

The deal between the company and Northumbria Police works in two parts.

Firstly, it sees specialist officers share their knowledge and expertise on harmful online interactions with the 200-strong team working at the centre in Newcastle, who then apply that training to their daily work.

Secondly, an agreement is in place so that in extreme cases, where there is a threat to life or potential serious harm spotted, staff can fast track the information to police.

They will then decide whether or not to act.

…

Staff in Newcastle can also recommend the company start legal proceedings in some instances.

So Ubisoft is making decisions for the police?

Also – they appear to be talking about private conversations with your friends. Most Ubisoft online games are co-op rather than competitive. So if you are in playing with a friend and say “get a load of this stupid bitch” referring to one of Ubisoft’s empowered female characters, you go to prison.

This relationship between Ubisoft and the Joke Police seems like some kind of a joke.

But it is indeed real life.

This is what happens when you allow women into male spaces.

They just come in and monitor and patrol and start trying to force a vaginal system on men.

This is the price of losing Gamergate.

The gaming community is like Germany after World War II – occupied by Zoe Quinn’s forces.

We are all now on our own personal depression quest as we play games filled with black women and trannies and then go to prison for joking about it.

We never should have made Sargon of Akkad the general of Gamergate forces.

He never even succeeded in getting Donald Trump to tweet about Gamergate.

You had one job, Sargon: get Donald Trump to tweet about Gamergate.

But it was too much for you.

Nah, Sargon’s okay. He fought hard. He even tried to seize control of the government.

I’ve been saying he should get a cozy.tv account.

I bet the krauts are gonna be even goofier than the Brits at this

Just because it’s not a crime doesn’t mean it isn’t pure hatred of the color of the skin.

Or, for that matter: hatred of the length of the nose.

Life Site News:

In North Rhine-Westphalia, a heavily populated state in western Germany, the local government announced that it is setting up four reporting centers for “anti-queer and racist incidents.”

At these centers, citizens will be able to report activities “below the limit of punishability” – meaning activities that are not considered criminal offenses under German law.

In addition to the already launched anti-Semitism reporting center, the establishment of four further reporting centers has now begun. They focus on the following topics:

1) anti-queer activities
2) anti-Muslim racism
3) antiziganism (discriminations against Roma and Sinti people, “gypsies”)
4) anti-Black, anti-Asian and other forms of racism.

“We have set a number of goals for the new legislative period to further reduce discrimination in our society,” said North Rhine-Westphalia’s Family Minister Josefine Paul.

Die NRW Landesregierung registriert jetzt Nicht-Verbrechen. Kafka hätte es sich nicht schöner ausdenken können. Die nächste Stufe ist dann wohl die Statistik für Gedankenverbrechen. Die @CDUNRW_de hat den Regierungssitz teuer bezahlt. pic.twitter.com/ykBUBw0Xza

— Birgit Kelle (@Birgit_Kelle) July 15, 2022

“The establishment of the reporting centers is an important first step,” she added. “With this system of reporting centers, which is unique in Germany, we also want to register incidents of discrimination that are below the threshold of punishability and are therefore not recorded in the police statistics.”

This will give us an even more comprehensive picture and enable us to draw important conclusions for intervention and prevention. I am pleased that we have found experienced and well-networked sponsors for the four additional hotlines, who are now taking care of setting up the facilities.

Paul is responsible for the project of setting up the reporting centers. She is a member of the left-wing Green Party and lives in a same-sex relationship with Saxony’s Justice Minister Katja Meier, who is also a member of the Green Party.

Josefine Paul (right) and her “wife” Katja Meier

According to the state government’s website, work is also being done on a coordinated database system in which the reported cases of discrimination are recorded, analyzed and documented. The state government is providing 140,000 euros for the establishment of each of the four reporting centers. The centers are scheduled to start operation in mid-2023.

Democracy doesn’t only destroy freedom. Obviously, it does destroy freedom.

But it also destroys the desire for freedom. The population of a democracy does not care about freedom.

Jews have no sense of humor at all.

Except for Rodney Dangerfield. He was funny.

But yeah, they will try to get you thrown in prison for a joke that ostensibly hurts their feelings.

I don’t think this joke actually did hurt their feelings, I think they just fear anything that could “trivialize” their trivial whining.

So they patrol Instagram for jokes, then call the cops.

Metro:

Three girls have sparked outrage after a picture emerged showing them doing Nazi salutes outside Auschwitz.

The picture showing the girls standing outside the ‘gate of death’ at the WW2 concentration camp was posted on Instagram by the girls on Tuesday but was deleted shortly after.

But not before museum authorities at the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial spotted the picture and called in prosecutors.

Though giving a Nazi salute is not banned in Poland, the law does forbid hate speech based on religion, with prison sentences of up to three years.

But this wasn’t hate speech.

It was a Nazi salute.

So no law was broken.

The Jews of course knew that, but called the cops anyway.

Because even though they broke no law, Jewish whining can get them doxed, put on a list and harassed for the rest of their lives.

For a joke picture.

I am so very tired of Jews. 

Twitter has really stepped up their thought policing efforts with new policies that went into affect today. The new policies pretty much allow them to ban anybody they want for any reason.

Twitter had previously announced that they were planning on implementing even more stringent policies to ban users who have dared to express wrong think. Some of those measures went into affect today.

The new policy itself is quite insane. It basically means that they’ll be banning almost anyone that has a political view to the right of Karl Marx. Think I’m joking? The policy is so vague that they can apply it to ban almost anybody they want.

Here are the relevant portions outlining who they plan on dropping the ban hammer on.

Twitter Blog:

Accounts that affiliate with organizations that use or promote violence against civilians to further their causes. Groups included in this policy will be those that identify as such or engage in activity — both on and off the platform — that promotes violence. This policy does not apply to military or government entities and we will consider exceptions for groups that are currently engaging in (or have engaged in) peaceful resolution.

Content that glorifies violence or the perpetrators of a violent act. This includes celebrating any violent act in a manner that may inspire others to replicate it or any violence where people were targeted because of their membership in a protected group. We will require offending Tweets to be removed and repeated violations will result in permanent suspension.

Any account that abuses or threatens others through their profile information, including their username, display name, or profile bio. If an account’s profile information includes a violent threat or multiple slurs, epithets, racist or sexist tropes, incites fear, or reduces someone to less than human, it will be permanently suspended. We plan to develop internal tools to help us identify violating accounts to supplement user reports.

Hateful imagery will now be considered sensitive media under our media policy. We consider hateful imagery to be logos, symbols, or images whose purpose is to promote hostility and malice against others based on their race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or ethnicity/national origin. If this type of content appears in header or profile images, we will now accept profile-level reports and require account owners to remove any violating media.

So if you expose the savage like nature of various non-Whites, they’ll ban you from the service. Having a Pepe the Frog or Groyper avatar could get you banned. Even hurting someone’s feelings could get you banned. And you don’t even have to post wrong think on Twitter to be subjected to this policy. Offline wrong think can also get you banned.

It appears as if Britain First’s Jayda Fransen, American Renaissance’s Jared Taylor and Occidental Dissent’s Hunter Wallace have already been banned.

It has begun…
Press F for respect😞#TwitterPurge #TwitterHolocaust pic.twitter.com/4dvoGPcppe

— White Is Love (@silentgroyper) December 18, 2017

Breaking: Britain First leader @JaydaBF, who was retweeted by Donald Trump three times last month, appears to have been suspended by Twitter. pic.twitter.com/dRV4HECdF0

— Mark Di Stefano 🤙🏻 (@MarkDiStef) December 18, 2017

They got @occdissent… pic.twitter.com/jfQbpbqUT4

— sevenwithcheese (@sevenwithcheese) December 18, 2017

What’s funny is how all of these leftists are using terms like “snowflakes” to criticize people who have issues with this policy. They don’t know how to troll worth a shit. They’re the ones who are supporting an online safe space where anybody who challenges their political views is banned. You don’t get to be much more of a “snowflake” than that.

The good news is that Twitter’s new policy greatly expands the number of users who can get banned. Since leftists are by their nature openly violent, there’s a good chance that Twitter will have to purge many of them as well.

/mode #chan +b *!*@*

This policy ensures that fewer and fewer people are going to use the service. One of the original appeals of Twitter was the conflict that occurred between people with differing political views.

The fallout from the financial disaster that “ban fucking everyone” is going to cause is going to increase calls for government intervention in the social media space. Sites like Facebook and Twitter have become the public square of the 21st century. Private corporations with monopoly-like powers shouldn’t be choosing who can and who can’t participate.

Not only should they not be allowed, they don’t want to do it. @jack held out with “free speech wing of the free speech party” then got caught on the slippery slope when he banned Andrew Anglin, MILO and Chuck Johnson. He bent and broke, being bullied into mass bannings. The company is effectively committing suicide.

Leftists are hailing him as a hero for shutting it down. I remember a short period of time ago when leftists were all about dismantling the big corporations. Apparently, they don’t mind big monopolies so long as they are censoring the political viewpoints of their opponents. The fact that they support this reveals how intellectually dishonest these people are. Their entire world view is based off of childish emotional reactions instead of reasoned objective logic.

The great Twitter purge is in full swing. It will be interesting to see who is left standing. I personally dare @jack to ban Donald Trump.

Andrew Anglin contributed to this report. 

If you’ve ever felt dislike for anything, you belong in a concentration camp.

The problem with “hate crimes” and “hate speech” is that ultimately, they’re about policing people’s thoughts and feelings, rather than their actions. And not only is that concept an affront to our most fundamental conception of justice, it’s also completely nuts.

The people governing the UK are so unhinged, so paranoid, so delusional, that they can’t stand the idea that people might be allowed to think and say things they don’t approve of.

Once they set upon that path, there was only ever one way it could go. An ever-increasing level of control and insanity.

But I have to say that even I’m surprised to see how far it’s come, and how quickly things have moved.

Breitbart:

Official guidelines insist a hate crime must be driven by “hostility”, but when contacted, many UK forces are unable to give a definition of what they mean by “hostility” in the context of hate crimes.

Breitbart London contacted dozens of forces to ask for their working definition of “hostility” and was referred on to the “dictionary definition” which includes “unfriendliness” and “dislike”.

Others referred Breitbart London to national bodies, including the College of Policing (CoP) and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), which both admit there is an “absence of a precise legal definition of hostility”, with the latter also referring individual forces onto “dictionary definitions” for the purpose of investigating hate crimes.

UK police say hostility under hate crime legislation can include “unfriendliness”.

Well lock me the hell up, then. pic.twitter.com/WmeOddX0a0

— Raheem 🇬🇧🇺🇸 (@RaheemKassam) October 16, 2017

Dictionary definitions include a wide range of normal human behaviours and emotions, and images on social media suggest police officers are being told to look out for “unfriendliness” as a sign of a hate crime.

The CPS also mentions “ill-will, ill-feeling, spite, contempt, prejudice, unfriendliness, antagonism, resentment, and dislike” as examples of hostility that could be taken from a dictionary.

Many of these emotions are subjective, raising concerns police could target people inconsistently and unfairly, or due to misunderstandings and miscommunications. Others have pointed out “dislike” of immoral things is often honourable.

Oh, you don’t have to worry about the police targeting people “inconsistently” or “unfairly.” It’s going to be very consistent.

They’ll consistently target White people.

Obviously a hate crime.

Peaceful protest, exercising their free speech.

This new insight is coming hot on the heels of recent revelations about speech related arrests in the UK. British police arrested around 20 people per day in 2016 for the grave crime of saying unkind things on the internet.

Considering how the police forces are ignoring Paki grooming gangs and allowing Moslems to create “no-go zones” all over the place, it seems like the cops have stopped enforcing the law altogether and instead spend their days browsing twitter and arresting posters with politically incorrect opinions.

I guess that’s much safer than trying to control Moslem criminals and terrorists, huh?

It’s becoming absolutely clear that the ruling power in the UK is hell-bent on destroying their own people for the benefit of hostile foreigners, and there’s nothing they’re not prepared to do in order to achieve their goals.

Now that the British police has been transformed from a law-enforcement agency to a thought-control unit, what’s the next step? Unfortunately, I have a feeling we’ll find out soon enough.

This is the dox-squad. One off-color joke on Twitter and they will wreck your shit, m8.

London is about the closest thing we have in our world to a dystopian cyberpunk metropolis. There are cameras on every street corner, the entire population was replaced by weird foreigners and the mayor is a Moslem terrorist for some reason.

Unhappy with the state of affair, they’re kicking things up a notch with a new cyber-thought police.

BBC:

A police unit to help tackle online hate crime and provide better support for victims in London has been launched by the capital’s mayor.

The Online Hate Crime Hub is made up of five specially trained Met police officers who will try to identify, prevent and investigate online abuse.

They’ll be working hard to crush your freedoms, you filthy kaffir!

Sadiq Khan said officers would “work with community experts to develop the police’s understanding of online hate”.

“Community experts” is probably a code-word for “Jews who are looking to clamp down on the goyim.

It is the first hub of its kind in the UK and will cost £1.7m over two years.

It is being funded by the Met and the Mayor’s Office for Policing And Crime (MOPAC), with £452,000 also being contributed by the Home Office Police Innovation Fund.

A cheap price to pay for finally being safe from mean words online, right?

Alternatively, we could hire people to read people’s social media feed and print out only the politically correct posts to protect people’s feelings. It could end up being cheaper in the long run.

Any online hate crimes reported to police in the capital, including abuse posted on Twitter and Facebook, will be looked into by the unit.

Officers will provide referrals to victim support groups and work with police in relevant boroughs to investigate.

City Hall said discussions were also under way with social media companies “to develop appropriate online sanctions for perpetrators of online hate”.

So they’ll have your ass banned from Twitter on top of giving you a fine and jail time.

Classy.

But the reality is that we have a similar situation in America as well, even if the government can’t shut down free speech like it could in Europe. What difference does it make if you get a fine from the government, or if mega-corporations conspire to get you fired and make your life hell?

The end result is the same.

We’re fighting against people who hate us with every fiber of their being.

If they could, they would just have everyone who posts racist jokes on Twitter executed.

Never forget that.

Remember when you used to always get linked to the satirical newspaper “The Onion”?

You don’t anymore, do you?

It’s because satire is dead.

The SJWs killed it by turning themselves into a parody of themselves.

The Independent:

A UK university has been accused of censoring free speech for banning phrases such as “right-hand man” and “gentleman’s agreement” in favour of more inclusive, gender neutral language.

Cardiff Metropolitan University’s revised code of practice states more appropriate terms should be used where possible, adding that students should not allow their “cultural background” to affect their choice of words on campus.

“Forefathers”, “mankind” and “sportsmanship” are also on the list of 34 words and phrases to be avoided as part of efforts to “embrace cultural diversity” by the university.

Students and staff could face disciplinary procedures if they fail to adhere to the language policy, but some have accused Cardiff Metropolitan of restricting their free speech, labelling the policy an “insulting” attempt to dictate their choice of words.

Dr Joanna Williams, an academic freedom advocate and University of Kent lecturer, told The Telegraph the ban was “unnecessary”.

“The idea that in a university people need to be dictated to in this way is really insulting to students and academics, we should be able to cope with words.

“These words have evolved over a long period of time and they don’t have sexist associations.”

The policy also dictates that the phrases “homosexual” and “heterosexual” should not be used as they are “laden with the values of a previous time”.

Right now, this is imploding.

You are witnessing it implode.

Here’s the complete list of banned words and their replacements.

Cardiff Metropolitan University’s Guide to Inclusive Language:

Term – Suggested alternative

“Best man for the job” – Best person for the job
“Businessman/woman” – Businessperson, manager, executive
“Chairman/woman” – Chair, chairperson, convenor, head
“Charwoman, cleaning lady” – Cleaner
“Craftsman/woman” – Craftsperson, craft worker
“Delivery man” – Delivery clerk, courier
“Dear Sirs” – Dear Sir/Madam (or Madam/Sir)
“Fireman” – Fire-fighter
“Forefathers” – Ancestors, forebears
“Foreman/woman” – Supervisor, head juror
“Gentleman’s agreement” – Unwritten agreement, agreement based on trust
“Girls” (for adults) – Women
“Headmaster/mistress” – Head teacher
“Housewife” – Shopper, consumer, homemaker (depends on context)
“Layman” – Lay person
“Man” or “mankind” – Humanity, humankind, human race, people
“Man” (verb) eg man the desk – Operate, staff, work at
“Man in the street”, “common man” – Average/ordinary/typical citizen/person – but is there such a person?
“Man-hour” – Work-hour, labour time
“Man-made” – Artificial, manufactured, synthetic
“Manpower” – Human resources, labour force, staff, personnel, workers, workforce
“Miss/Mrs” – Ms unless a specific preference has been stated – though its common not to use titles at all these days
“Policeman/woman” – Police Officer
“Right-hand man” – Chief assistant
“Salesman/girl/woman” – Sales assistant/agent/clerk/representative/staff/worker
“Spokesman/woman” – Spokesperson, representative
“Sportsmanship” – Fairmess, good humour, sense of fair play
“Steward/ess” – Airline staff, flight attendant, cabin crew
“Tax man” – Tax officer/inspector
“Waitress” – Waiter, server
“Woman doctor” (or feminine forms of nouns eg actress, poetess) – Doctor (actor, poet etc)
“Working man”, “working mother/wife” – Wage-earner/taxpayer/worker
“Workman” – Worker/operative/trades person
“Workmanlike” – Efficient/proficient/skilful/thorough

A candidate in the Stoke byelection has been arrested on suspicion of stirring up racial hatred.

…Barbara Fielding, 78, who is standing as an independent, was arrested after a complaint about her website, which calls for all immigrants to be repatriated and warns of a “seeping tide of Islamic warriors”. 

Police seized her mobile phone and computer and later released her on bail until next month. Fielding said: “I was arrested on suspicion of publishing racial hatred material on my website. Someone must have made a complaint to the police. They took me away and took my files, my paperwork, my mobile phone and my computer. I don’t think I’ve done anything wrong. I’m not worried about this.

“I’m giving information to anybody who wants to read it. I’m not saying people should go out and do something bad to immigrants. I set up my website 18 months ago. I wasn’t involved in politics before, but I just felt politicians had made a mess of things.”

Staffordshire police confirmed that a 78-year-old woman had been arrested under section 19 of the Public Order Act 1986, which makes it an offence to publish or distribute written material which may stir up racial hatred.

Source

The criminalisation of free speech is peculiarly sinister when its victim is a candidate for political office. This really is the undisguised suppression of democracy. And the reason it is sinister is that some people will interpret it as foreclosing the possibility of peaceful change.

Here’s what she wrote on her website. Note the praise of Trump.

After reading the last bit, I have the feeling that it may not have been her comments about Muslims that got her arrested.

On the same day national newspapers launched a manhunt against Millennial Woes The Guardian carried a piece by somebody called ”Pandora Blake” in which Blake lamented the draconian online censorship laws in Britain:

I’m no stranger to censorship. Last year, Dreams of Spanking was unsuccessfully targeted under the Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014, because my consensual BDSM videos depict spankings that leave marks. After a traumatic, invasive investigation, I was forced to take my site offline – and I was left in no doubt that the law considers kinky sexualities such as mine to be obscene.

Acts that are legal to perform in the UK, but not legal to depict in porn, which includes fisting, watersports and female ejaculation (if the fluid lands on another person, or is consumed).

What message are we sending to young women by criminalising porn that depicts a visual, undeniable representation of female sexual fulfilment? Do we really want girls to think that the way their bodies naturally respond to pleasure is obscene?

Attacking online porn is a cheap way to score political points – and it’s a distraction from the real issues.

The Guardian didn’t just carry the story, they allowed this insane pervert to write her own article on why it’s wrong for her to be unable to make money from peddling ”fisting’ videos to young girls under the guise of ”education”. To the left this is what constitutes a ‘free speech’ issue worth fighting for, if the opportunity arises to ram Western civilization further into the sewer than it already is then the most prominent left leaning broadsheet in the land will embrace it with gusto.

Indeed, they’ll invoke libertarian arguments to back up their case, if you don’t like this woman being able to flog squirting and fisting videos then nobody is forcing you to watch them, we’re all free to watch and pay for, and read what we like, it’s a free country isn’t it?

On the other-hand, if you sit at home in your dressing gown, smoking cigarettes and ruminating on where the left’s morality is taking us then you’re likely to have an anti-fa thug group call their friends in the media and you’ll receive a punishment beating for simply having an opinion, an opinion which nobody is forced to agree with on a platform nobody has to watch, we being free individuals and all….

The article in The Daily Record which was then wafted up to the Mirror parent paper, which is nationwide, is so gobsmackingly retarded that it isn’t even worth dissecting, here are a few quotes:

A RACIST Scots video blogger spouted his hatred on stage at an infamous US event where far-right extremists shouted “Hail Trump”.

Millennial Woes NPI speech was actually a rather heartfelt warning to a 19 year old white girl on the dangers of atomization, it can be seen in full here.

The vile mystery man – believed to be from Edinburgh – gave a speech at a white nationalist conference in Washington DC that has sparked a political firestorm.

…

It has now emerged the Scottish hatemonger, who has managed to keep his identity a secret, also appeared at the annual conference of the National Policy Institute on Saturday.

Using the moniker ‘Millennial Woes’, the vlogger has posted around 600 videos to his YouTube account, racking up 18,000 subscribers and nearly 2.4 million views.

Some anti-fascist campaigners have spent more than a year trying to identify the man – believed to be in his 30s – as he continues to deliver hate online.

Talking straight to camera with a well-spoken Scots accent and often smoking cigarettes, he pours out a stream of sordid venom.

His whining invective can run up to an hour in length as he bleats about his ignorant views. But campaigners say the man has developed a growing “fanbase” among other deluded far-right supporters.

Asked if he fears YouTube will shut down his channel due to his hateful speech, the vlogger said he plans to launch his own website instead to reach his twisted followers.

He said he’d been reported to police over his videos. Campaigners have made strenuous efforts to identify the vlogger to name and shame him. One investigator managed to identify a building apparently spotted in the background of a video as a hotel not far from Edinburgh’s Leith Walk.

Behold the ‘tolerant’ and ‘inclusive’ left in all their putrid, festering scumbaggery. A national newspaper can proudly proclaim that ‘campaigners’ have spent more than a year chasing a man down for the crime of having an opinion on YouTube. When they say ”name and shame him” what they really mean is terrify him and his family by using their media as a baseball bat, he’ll be found out, named and then plastered across the papers for the masses to sneer at. Perhaps a kicking on the street, maybe a brick through his mother’s window, the cops might smash down the door for hate think, that’ll teach the scumbag for being popular, for being a ‘free thinker’.

This is what the left is, it’s what they have always been. The left are standing up for the little guy, speaking truth to power, by using the mass media to destroy a man who voices an opinion on the internet, but if that opinion is too popular for comfort then that’s the left’s problem, not Millennial Woes’s. If Theresa May was serious about her ”Tolerant liberal Britain” guff then she should ban the left leaning media for attacking an individual because of their views, such behaviour is the antithesis of liberalism!

Pandora Blake is endorsed by the left because peddling barbaric smut to young girls is what the left would consider to be the ”right side of history” what they mean by that is that the general trend of the zeitgeist, the direction which western civilization is heading, is one of increased liberation, tolerance and inclusion or differing ‘lifestyle choices’. A running theme of this blog is that those ‘choices’ always seem to concur with whatever the interests of High Finance and Globalism want, however, we shall leave that to one side this time and concentrate of the left itself.

If, as the left wants us to believe, the direction of history favours their views on personal liberation and self indulgence, if that were the case, then it would happen naturally, truly naturally, there would be no need for ‘Hate Speech laws” or anti-fa thugs in masks hunting people down, girls would feel comfortable watching other women being ”fisted” and boys would enjoy dressing up in pink and playing with dolls.

The problem is….it’s all crap!

….And it isn’t that we are too dumb to understand, we do, we understand it better than the lefties themselves. We know what the arguments are, we know (((who))) conjured up their world view and why, we understand the reasoning of the left, the problem is, it’s a vision of hell on earth which has to be resisted tooth and claw.

The ”Right side of history” argument is a sham, it isn’t based on the raising of conscience or making people ‘socially aware’ or ‘tolerance and understanding’. The historical narrative, control of what we are and where we are headed, is enforced, first through the media, and then through laws, and in the end, through violent street mobs and outright persecution of dissidents. The Daily Record hit piece, and the anti-fa blog which began this witch hunt (I’m not linking to them but we shall revisit them another time) are obviously furious at the popularity of Millennial Woes YouTube channel, and they should be, every single video he has ever made disembowels everything they stand for with consummate ease.

Millennial Woes isn’t a ‘Nazi’ he has a distaste for authoritarianism, he’s the average guy who asks ”What the hell is going on?”. He plays the part of Truman in the Truman Show movie, we are living under a smelly dome of leftist thought and ideas which we are told is natural and good. Millennial Woes invites his audience to explore the dome with him as he points out the fake weather, the false smiles, the plot-holes and the synthetic nature of dome-life. And that’s why they hate him, and why they want him destroyed.

Leftists are merely the dome technicians desperately trying to scare and threaten the increasingly aware captives into not seeing what they’re seeing, not to think what they are thinking, when we look at the left all we see are dead eyed ideologues, boring shit-for-brains imbeciles everybody despises but, who are, nevertheless, dangerous people to cross because of their ‘connections’ which could harm us or our loved ones.

It takes astonishing bravery, fortitude, courage and moral fibre to stand up, or sit in a dressing gown, and simply say ”No! I shall not listen to the lies any longer”. And when such a person is attacked and vilified all it creates is yet more people asking why they were attacked and vilified.

As another prominent YouTuber tried to explain to a prominent leftist recently ”You’re fucked, your ideology is dead, all you people have going for you is violence and hysterics”.

Goodnight left-side.

The evidence is in: Google is operated by Nazis.

There’s a grand conspiracy, by large internet corporations like Google, Facebook and Twitter, to push nationalist ideas and anti-migrant attitudes.

What they do is that they’ll influence search results and story suggestions to shape the common people’s perceptions towards Nazism.

This has been ongoing for a long time, unreported, unchallenged.

Until one woman finally had the courage to stand up and say, “enough is enough!”

The Guardian:

Angela Merkel has called on major internet platforms to divulge the secrets of their algorithms, arguing that their lack of transparency endangers debating culture.

The German chancellor said internet users had a right to know how and on what basis the information they received via search engines was channelled [sic] to them.

Speaking to a media conference in Munich, Merkel said: “I’m of the opinion that algorithms must be made more transparent, so that one can inform oneself as an interested citizen about questions like ‘what influences my behaviour on the internet and that of others?’.

“Ja, ja. Facebook. Shut it down.”

This dog of a woman is actually worried that facebook isn’t sufficiently biased in favor of her invasion agenda.

Let that sink in for a moment.

“Algorithms, when they are not transparent, can lead to a distortion of our perception, they can shrink our expanse of information.”

An algorithm is the formula used by a search engine to steer a request for information. They are different for every search engine, highly secret and determine the significance or ranking of a web page.

Merkel has joined a growing number of critics who have highlighted the dangers of receiving information that confirms an existing opinion or is recommended by people with similar ideas.

“This is a development that we need to pay careful attention to,” she told the conference, adding that a healthy democracy was dependent on people being confronted by opposing ideas.

Nothing makes sense anymore…

I guess she means that the “conventional” ideas are racist and bigoted, and that people have to be exposed to new and fresh ideas… like multiculturalism, tolerance and anti-racism?

I mean, I’m having a hard time following her here.

“The big internet platforms, through their algorithms, have become an eye of a needle which diverse media must pass through [to access their users],” she said.

There has been increasing concern about so-called filter bubbles and echo chambers – the result of an internet search in which an algorithm supposes the information someone would like to see based on previous searches, as well as information it might have about their location or preferences – in the light of the growing strength of populist movements in Europe, the Brexit vote in the UK and the rise of Donald Trump in the US. This month, President Barack Obama’s former social media adviser Caleb Gardner highlighted the danger of filter bubbles – a phrase invented by the internet activist Eli Pariser.

“More likely than not, you get your news from Facebook,” Gardner told students at Northwestern University in Illinois. “Forty-four per cent of US adults get news on the site, and 61% of millennials … if that doesn’t frighten you, you don’t know enough about Facebook’s algorithm. If you have a parent who’s a Trump supporter, they are seeing a completely different set of news items than you are.”

We need to go back to the good old days of centralized TV news, when things were really objective.

Germany is a occupied state with 1984-style thought-crime laws.

But that’s not enough for Mama Merkel.

Internet companies are solidly in the hands of Jews and managed by rabid SJW’s. They actively conspire to twist news suggestions to push this liberal agenda and suppress nationalist stories.

But that’s not enough for Mama Merkel.

I guess she wants total, top-down state control of every trending story on all social media, as well as the power to customize the news feed of all German citizens to prevent them from having wrong thoughts.