Furthermore, it’s not just about whether or not the people have facts. The government now wants everyone to be forced to agree with everything they say. So they are opposed to people believing something different than they say, even if that thing is wrong.

France24:

After rising to the fore in the US during the most fraught presidential campaign the country has seen for decades, the QAnon phenomenon has emerged in France – prompting President Emmanuel Macron’s government to order a multiagency inquiry on conspiracist movements scheduled to report back at the end of February.

The French state agency responsible for tackling sectarian movements, MIVILUDES, has received some 15 reports over recent weeks raising the alarm about the rise of QAnon in France, Le Figaro reported. The agency described the development of the movement as “highly concerning” in an internal communication seen by the French paper.

As she commissioned an inquiry by the police and MIVILUDES, Minister for Citizenship Marlène Schiappa expressed the same sentiments: The development of “new conspiracist groups” on French soil is “very worrying”, she told France 3 in January – underlining that the government “has its eye on” QAnon.

The QAnon phenomenon encompasses “a few hundred thousand” adherents, Tristan Mendès France, an expert on conspiracist movements at Paris-Diderot University, told Le Figaro.

The website DéQodeurs is a major French gateway to its world. The site’s centrepiece is a big screen at the top of the homepage broadcasting a video titled “We are the people” – which has also garnered more than 57,000 views on YouTube since its publication on January 27, even though the site removed DéQodeurs’ dedicated channel in October.

…

The idea of Trump as a hero waging a secretive war against a cabal of cannibalistic, Satan-worshipping paedophiles is the heart of QAnon’s fantasy – none of which is true.

It seems like if they were really confident, they wouldn’t have to add that it isn’t true.

The article goes on to describe the shape of the QAnon movement in France, and the government’s plan to prevent them from communicating with each other.

They note that they’re especially dangerous because they don’t believe everything Anthony Fauci has to say about the coronavirus (which at this point, could be saying “I think one mask is enough.”)

They’re locked in their houses already (especially on the weekends), so there is no threat of them communicating in real life. So it’s just a logistical matter to stop them communicating online.

A Kooky Evil

It really is just kooky the level of authoritarianism we are currently under. And it’s wacky how quickly it has appeared. A lot of people still haven’t been directly touched by it, other than obviously through the coronavirus lockdown stuff. But everyone is going to be touched by it.

I have to say: when they first came down on me, starting really in 2014, it was a shocking experience. I was like “Wait, but all I did was type stuff on the internet? Most of it was just joking around? What is going? I’m now being hunted like some kind of criminal, because I disagreed with the media?”

Basically, I was forced to confront the fact that I was already living in a totally controlled society, and I just never knew it was controlled because I never pressed the edges of it. It was like realizing that I was just in a large prison cell.

It was really no different than living in North Korea, I realized. The overwhelming majority of people in that society follow the rules of the society, and never know what happens if you happen to not follow the rules.

Then I met this guy named weev and he was like “yeah dude, this is how they getcha.”

By the time 2017 came around and they totally crushed me with censorship that before that had not existed, I was still shocked by the degree of it, but the concept was known to me: the powers that be take speech that they disagree with incredibly seriously, and they will come down on you like a piano pushed off a highrise building if you start saying something they don’t like and people start listening to you.

Right now, they are not hiding the fact that we are all living in a large prison cell, and they are starting to really get in people’s faces. Soon, everyone will have had these people right up in their faces, and they will have to make a decision about how they are going to deal with that.

Most will of course cower like women, because they can’t imagine inconveniencing themselves for some notion of a greater good, or personal dignity, or any other abstraction.

Some, however, due to romanticism (religion, primarily, but also other types of romanticism) or lunacy are going to push back against it. They know that a certain number of people are going to push back against it, and they have their estimates of how many it will be, based on their computer simulations, but they are going to make for certain that they are able to withstand whatever amount of pushback they get.

That is what you are seeing, with the military in Washington, with the investigations into things people said on the internet, with a declaration of war on white people in general: they are preparing the necessary arrangements to put down any and all pushback that they might get.

We’re in for a real wacky ride, I can tell you this much.

Cerebro is coming.

This is a great way to investigate thoughtcrime.

Daily Mail:

New technology that can read minds and turn thoughts into complete sentences with the help of AI is giving hope to people who can’t speak.

Researchers from the University of California say their technology is able to translate brain activity into English word by word with the help of machine learning.

The technology could revolutionise the way people who can’t speak or move are able to communicate, as it is more natural than existing tools, the team say.

It can revolutionize way more than that.

I’m sure this kind of technology gives hope to people who can’t speak, but it gives much more hope to the people who want to use tools like this for other ends.

Powerful people will become more powerful with this technology, and considering who’s holding the power in the West nowadays, the picture is quite dark.

It has an accuracy rate of 97 per cent – more than twice as high as other brain-signal decoding devices and works by mapping activity of neurons to words.

Translating neurons to words enables it to type word sequences on a computer interface in real time – which can then be read out by a synthetic voice.

The current process of giving people without a voice the ability to speak can be incredibly slow as it requires monitoring residual eye movement or muscle twitches.

They use these movements to mark letters that spell out words – but it is slow.

Researchers found that in many cases information needed to produce fluent speech is still in the brain and so this technology can help them express those words.

Corresponding author Dr Joseph Makin, of California University in San Francisco, said: ‘Average word error rates are as low as three per cent.’

The study was carried out on four epilepsy patients who had been fitted with brain implants to monitor their seizures.

Their neural activity was turned ‘word by word into an English sentence – in real time,’ said Dr Makin.

Previous techniques have had limited success – with efficiency far below that of natural speech.

In earlier studies using a similar technique they could only decode fragments of spoken words – or less than 40 percent of words in spoken phrases.

So Dr Makin and colleagues used artificial intelligence, or machine learning, to link the behaviour of brain cells directly to sentences.

…

His team also found brain regions that strongly contributed to speech decoding were also involved in speech production and speech perception.

The approach decoded spoken sentences from one patient’s neural activity with an error rate similar to that of professional-level speech transcription, said Dr Makin.

Additionally, when the AI networks were pre-trained on neural activity and speech from one person before training on another participant, decoding results improved.

This suggests the approach may be transferable across people.

Further research is needed to fully investigate the potential and to increase decoding beyond the restricted language, Dr Makin added.

They could apply a similar approach to things other than words.

Soon they’ll have a nice little tool to browse people’s thoughts that will allow them to immediately convict anyone of thinking the wrong things.

The Amadeu Antonio Institute in Germany has published a brochure for teachers, offering tips on how they can identify the children of “Nazi” parents.

The tell-tale signs are apparently pigtails and dresses among girls, and a strong interest in sports among boys.

The brochure is called “Ene, mene, muh – und raus bist du!” [Eenie, meenie, miney, moh – out you go!] Inequality and infant pedagogy”.

Children cannot themselves be Nazis, the brochure warns. But their parents might be. If the children draw shapes that look like runes or swastikas, it could be a sign they are being reared in a Nazi household.

If the children seem subdued and exhibit no discipline problems, it is possible they are being reared in an authoritarian “Volkish” household. If they do craft work at home or seem comfortable with traditional gender roles, if the girls wear pigtails and dresses or the boys seem physically well-trained, these could be also be warning signs.

It describes parents complaining about boys being allowed or encouraged to wear dresses or put on nail polish at the school. These parents suffer from stereotypes about masculinity or femininity that could serve a bridging function towards “far-right” ideologies.

The Amadeu Antonio Institute was founded by Anetta Kahane [her name a variant of Cohen, designating the ancient Jewish priestly caste]. It receives lavish funding from the German state. Kahane has admitted acting as an informant for the Stasi in the former East Germany.

Anetta Kahane – Keeping a close watch on uppity Goyim

The mainstream German conservative party has criticised the booklet while their Socialist coalition partners have welcomed it.

The UK has now become some kind of combination of Airstrip One and San Angeles (the city from the movie Demolition Man) with how they control speech.

With Count Dankula having been found guilty of “Grossly Offensive Speech,” the precedent has been set to charge and convict anyone who says something that someone does not agree with. This includes a teenage girl reposting rap lyrics containing the word nigger (or some variation of it).

On an unrelated note, Demolition Man was a great movie. It also came from a time when you could make the hero a masculine White man and the bad guy a crazy nog.

The first thing the nog does in the future is try to get guns to shoot up the city.

That also looks like the modern UK police force when they need to deal with vibrancy. Demolition Man was right with their predictions of the future.

Google: editing reality itself until it’s politically correct.

YouTube has been going on a censorship rampage, deleting or hiding every video that challenges their Jew bullshit. So now the only thing left is stuff they don’t like, but that carefully avoids violating their terms and conditions or being too “offensive.”

The solution?

Just edit in their Jew narratives to undermine the message of videos they disagree with.

Wired:

For the average internet user, Wikipedia operates in the background, its 44 million entries serving as a priceless resource, rarely thought of until you need to know the capital of Azerbaijan. This week, however, Wikipedia’s volunteer editors and the nonprofit that makes its work possible, the Wikimedia Foundation, suddenly found themselves in the news, tasked once again with providing a ground-level truth for a platform unwilling to provide one of its own.

Wikipedia is about as kiked of an information platform as you can find. The initial concept was to allow anyone to edit the articles. But then, they had to put people in charge of maintaining controversial subjects to prevent non-stop edit wars.

Naturally, the Jews infiltrated this elite clique of editors and now have an iron grip on the site’s narratives.

Encyclopedia Dramatica has you covered on this topic, fam.

On stage at the South by Southwest conference on Tuesday, YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki announced that her company would begin adding “information cues” to conspiracy theory videos, text-based links intended to provide users with better information about what they are watching. One of the sites YouTube plans to use is Wikipedia. “We’re just going to be releasing this for the first time in a couple weeks, and our goal is to start with the list of internet conspiracies listed where there is a lot of active discussion on YouTube,” Wojcicki said on stage.

In other words, they’re going to be adding in text boxes inside popular videos attacking the mainstream narrative. Those text boxes will contain links to Jew-approved articles that supposedly “debunks” the stuff in the video.

So there’s basically going to be an electronic Jew watching over your shoulder as you check out videos, interjecting when he doesn’t like what he’s hearing.

Thanks for the info, Schlomo.

The move came as a surprise—even to the Wikimedia Foundation. “In this case, neither Wikipedia nor the Wikimedia Foundation are part of a formal partnership with YouTube. We were not given advance notice of this announcement,” the organization said in a statement.

Lol, so Google is going to be Jewing Wikipedia out of their bandwidth – how fitting. Oh, but I wouldn’t worry, if Wikipedia is ever in serious trouble, I’m sure Google will sweep in and rescue them, as so many of their services are dependent on it.

Either way, its actually not very important what these articles being linked even say, nor is it important that the articles even address the points being made in the videos being edited. The idea is just to undermine their credibility with a big disclaimer saying “WARNING: THIS SHIT IS SUSPICIOUS AF! FOLLOW THIS LINK FOR A FACTUAL REBUTTAL!!!11”

Most people won’t even click the links, but the feeble minded might just think “oh, I guess this is bullshit then.”

It’s the same concept as sites like “Snopes,” which “fact check” various topics. If you actually bother to read their drivel, 95% of the time they don’t actually debunk anything or just make some stupid technical point. But just the fact that people can point to their article and say “oh, that was debunked by Snopes bro” is powerful.

Ultimately, I’m guessing this will be an effective method of censorship – for a while. Eventually, smarter people will catch on to the scam and these stupid edits will become a badge of honor and truthfulness, just as MSM counter-signaling is now a net positive in the eyes of most people.

Terrorists are purely motivated by mental illness. And if you reveal otherwise on twitter, you’re probably a racist.

For a long time, the media has had total control over the narrative. It really didn’t matter what the facts were, since very few people experienced events first hand, and the rest of the population got the story from the nightly news and newspapers. This was great for the system, since they had total control over what people knew and felt about the world.

But in the age of social media, everything is filmed and documented online. This means that independent agents can piece together the facts and present a more realistic narrative to the public.

A recent example of this, of course, is the death of Heather Heyer. The media immediately repoorted that she was hit by the car of a White nationalist, and blamed the charlottesville protesters for the incident. However, clever detective work has just revealed that she wasn’t even hit by any car, and died of a heart attack because of her disgusting level of obesity.

The system is panicking at this, fearing that the control of information is slipping away from their grasp.

Pathetically, they’re now pleading with victims of terrorist attacks to avoid spreading information on social media about their experience.

They don’t want footage like this circulating on the internet.

BBC:

NHS staff and terror attack victims and their families have been warned about the risks of using social media in new guidelines issued by NHS England.

The guide cautions that internet trolls may subject victims to “vile and upsetting abuse”, as was seen after the Manchester and London terror attacks.

It also warns people to be wary of journalists seeking accounts of events.

The process of retelling a story can make people “relive the worst parts” of horrific events, it warns.

This is such a transparently ridiculous excuse that it’s actually embarrassing that they’re going ahead with it.

Big Brother is watching you… But only so you don’t feel sad feels.

“Don’t report on terrorism, because it could make you feel bad.”

I think people can decide for themselves if things are going to make them feel bad.

Thankfully, they later explain what the real reason for these “guidelines” actually is.

People may say more than they intend to when “vulnerable, upset or angry”, it adds.

The NHS England guide also issues specific advice to younger people, cautioning: “People will use your information for their own ends and when you’re in the heat of the moment you may say more than you intend or later regret.”

Regarding trolls, it tells teenagers: “They can say things like you’re only doing something for money or to abuse the system and so on.

Ah, so this is what they’re really worried about. That people will “use the information for their own ends.” In other words, the right wing will reveal things to the public that the government would rather remain secret, or at least, low-profile.

Of course, they’re dressing this up as being about “avoiding false rumors” or “protecting people’s feelings,” but the reference to “trolls” indicates that their true fear is related to the spread of narrative-disrupting information.

The Jews and their slug-like servants want a world in which they maintain total control over the flow of information. Social media is driving them nuts. They want people to self-censor themselves to preserve their precious narrative.

Well, too bad, kikes. Try as you might, you’re not shutting down the internet. If you want to take the iPhones away from the normies, you’ll have to pry them from their cold, dead hands.

forcing

Political correctness is about manipulating people into washing their own brains.

This program is anti-human and anti-people.  It is our very nature to associate male weakness with femininity and homosexualism – you don’t have to be told to do so.  Children make this connection.  It is inborn.

From College Fix:

A new word-discouragement campaign at Duke University has labeled phrases such as “Man Up,” “That’s So Gay,” and “Don’t Be a Pussy” offensive language that “delegitimizes” homosexuality and oppresses and insults people.

But as the campaign has gained national popularity, its detractors have bristled at the effort, calling it a politically correct war on words that will stifle free speech and suggesting its true aim is to redefine terms to control public opinion and – ultimately – public policy.

In fact, the “You Don’t Say” campaign creators have admitted as much.

“Language is a reflection of how we think about others and view the world,” Jay Sullivan, a student leader of the campaign, tellsDuke Today. “My goal is to…. help facilitate discussion about how language affects many social issues, from race to gender and sexuality.”

The campaign consists of a series of black-and-white memes with students posing behind large pledges to avoid so-called offensive language.

“I don’t say ‘No Homo’ because it delegitimizes love and sexual identities,” says one.

“I don’t say ‘Man Up’ because the strongest people I know have cried in front of me, regardless of their age, gender or sex,” says another.

“I don’t say ‘Tranny’ because it’s insulting to transgender and genderqueer communities,” adds a third meme.

Other banned words include “bitch,” because it “insists feminism is inherently negative,” “‘fag,’ because it only serves to hurt and oppress homosexual men,” and “pussy,” as it “implies that having a certain feature is indicative of being a coward.”

The recently launched campaign has spread far and wide on social media and gained national attention in a variety of news reports. The effort is similar to the recent “Ban Bossy” campaign, and akin to other university student efforts that have banned the term “illegal immigrant” on campuses.

The campaign is a collaborative effort between a newly formed group at Duke University called Think Before You Talk and Blue Devils United, a Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer student advocacy group.

The campaign has gained plenty of supporters, as well as detractors, whose reactions range from sarcastic to disgusted.

Oh yes. I do say.