The other day, I was sitting behind a nasty old white woman at a cafe in the center of Lagos. I could tell she was American. Which is rare, because most white American females go to Cuba or some other Latin place for their sex tours.

Most of the white women who come here to take sexual advantage of locals are British or mainland European.

I guess it’s better to come here, as you’re much less likely to get suitcased by a Nigerian.

Anywho, this bitch was reading the news on her laptop and I was trying to figure out what site it was, because I could tell it wasn’t the standard for old white women, which is the New York Times.

It was the Washington Post, which I very rarely see the front page of because I use various methods to filter direct links to articles.

But do you know they still have “Democracy Dies in Darkness” as the slogan of their website?

This was put up three years ago, in February of 2017, just after Donald Trump assumed office.

Apparently, this is some kind of statement about how Trump is trying to destroy “the press” and throw the country into darkness so he can kill democracy.

I don’t really know what democracy is, other than the accepted definition of “a country run by Jews.” But clearly when they talk about “democracy,” they are implying something relating to “blah blah blah my freedoms.” And presumably, one of those freedoms is freedom of expression.

It’s in the UN’s “Universal Declaration of Human Rights,” which is one of the founding documents of post-war Jew democracy.

These Jew media people try to promote a persecution complex, saying that if Trump says he doesn’t agree with the mainstream Jewish media, and points out that they’re liars, that he’s “attacking the First Amendment.” Just like “democracy” means whatever they want it to mean, so does the First Amendment – and it’s now a violation of freedom of speech to disagree with Jews.

However, freedom of expression has been brutally gutted under the reign of Donald Trump. And it isn’t the freedom of expression of the Washington Post. It is the freedom of expression of everyone else in this country, who have suffered under a terrorist campaign of mass internet censorship.

Following Charlottesville, basically everyone who supported Donald Trump, who was not a plain establishment shill, was banned from all social media. Now, less than three years later, we are seeing Bernie Sanders people get censored on social media. And the real kicker is that it is mainstream Jewish outlets like the Washington Post and the New York Times that have called for this censorship, and have created a narrative to support it.

James O’Keefe was censored just this week, literally for tweeting at the Washington Post and asking for a correction.

It is clear that not only does Twitter do what the media wants them to do, they have a direct line of communication with Twitter and just ban anyone that the media tells them to ban.

The entire “Russia meddling” hoax is now coming to fruition. It was never about removing Donald Trump from office. It was about establishing a narrative that anyone who disagrees with the media is a secret agent of a foreign government who is trying to kill democracy and thus must be prevented from freely expressing themselves.

The teeth are about to come out for the far-left.

You’re going to see massive censorship of Bernie supporters.

Which is kind of hilarious, because these are the retards that demanded all of our freedom of speech be shut down. They backed up the mainstream media, multinational trillion dollar tech companies and the SPLC in this agenda to silence “Nazis” AKA Trump supporters, and now this beast they fed will swallow them. It’s going to be a real shocker when these people realize that they were all just useful idiots for the neoliberal establishment that doesn’t like communism any more than it likes fascism.

Ten years ago, leftists were mocking the Tea Party for being unwitting shills for multinational corporations. Now, they’ve become exactly that to a far more extreme degree.

This entire social justice agenda – gay pride, child trannies, mass immigration, legalized drugs – is being pushed by the very rich, and these retards just ate it up and let it completely replace their agenda for economic reform.

And they will look up from their bed of trannies and Somalians, and find that true communism will never be tried.

A Jewish journalist named Ian Shapira recently wrote a piece for the WaPo bemoaning the entry “restrictions” placed on Jews by Harvard University’s administrators in the early twentieth century.

Unfortunately for him, his article achieved little but prove that Harvard was infested with kikes even back then.

Washington Post:

In the early 20th century, some of Harvard’s leaders were deeply upset. Jews — “Hebrews” as they were dubbed at the Cambridge campus — were on the rise. Harvard’s president, Abbott Lawrence Lowell, was pushing for a cap. Fifteen percent seemed just the right amount to him. But to investigate the dilemma even further, Harvard decided to count the number of Jews enrolled between 1900 and 1922. The university wanted to see the exact rising slope of its Jewish demographic.

So, Harvard combed enrollment cards and other college records of students from the previous two decades, classifying each person into one of four categories: J1: a bona fide Jew. J2: more than likely a Jew; J3: “might be” a Jew; and, then “Other.”

Not a bad system. Though I think a “J0: Handrubbing Shekelmaster” category should have been added for the George Soros types, because those are the ones they really needed to watch out for.

The report’s conclusion: Just 7 percent of Harvard’s enrollment in 1900 was Jewish. By 1909, it was 10 percent. Six years later, it rose again to 15 percent. And in 1922, it was 21.5 percent, according to “The Chosen,” Jerome Karabel’s 2005 investigation into the history of Ivy League admissions.

To Lowell, the study confirmed his worst fears. “The summer hotel that is ruined by admitting Jews meets its fate, not because the Jews it admits are of bad character, but because they drive away the Gentiles, and then after the Gentiles have left, they leave also,” Lowell wrote in 1922 to a Harvard philosophy professor.

According to the Jewish Virtual Library, there were between 937,800 and 1,058,135 Jewish tapirs in the US in 1900 (a median of 997,967), while the total population of the US in 1900 was 76,212,168.

If Microsoft 10’s calculator is correct (which it might not be, because pajeets), that means that Jews were only 1.31% of the US population in 1900, thus already overrepresented at Harvard by over 500%!

And, of course, that percentage got higher and higher with each passing year… but we’re still supposed to think that we were persecuting these people!

Today, Harvard is essentially being accused of doing the same thing to Asian Americans. For the last four years, a group of Asian American students who applied to Harvard and were rejected has been suing the university, arguing that they were the subject of discrimination and that Harvard has been setting unofficial quotas. At the end of last month, even the Justice Department weighed in on the federal case, saying that plaintiffs’ evidence proves that the school has been engaging in “racial balancing” to select its classes, possibly running afoul of the Supreme Court’s limits on affirmative action.

Yes, it is. What the author cohenveniently forgets to mention, however, is that the Harvard of today is an almost totally Jewish institution. The president is a Jew, the faculty members are disproportionately Jewish, and the student body literally contains more Jews than actual whites:

This was back in 2014. It’s even worse now.

So the author – a Princeton graduate himself – is implicitly blaming whites for the fact that his fellow tribesmen are the ones pushing “Asian-Americans” (and other non-Jews) from Harvard.

Now that’s what I call chutzpah!

Here’s Shapira’s Twitter account. Using our black Twitter accounts, we should let him know that his tribe’s overrepresentation at Ivy League schools prevented our chilluns from getting dem diplomas. Tell him about how young Quantavious had dreams of attending Harvard Law School just like Obama, but he got rejected in favor of Jews and is now slinging crack on 5 Mile instead.

Again, I just don’t think that publicly stating “these Russians are humiliating us” is the way to go, guys.

I am not a PR expert, but I am a consumer of media, and to me this just couldn’t look any more whiny and faggy. Especially given that it is being combined with clearly empty threats. You are going to look weak no matter what, because you’ve been beat, but speaking as a man whose had his ass kicked before, I can tell you: there are more honorable ways to take a beating than this.

AFP:

The dramatic military campaign is Moscow’s first outside the former USSR since Soviet troops went into Afghanistan in 1979 and has led some to suggest that an emboldened Kremlin is aiming to reassert some of its lost super power status.

Using the latest Sukhoi jets and older Soviet aircraft, Russia has blasted command posts and training camps of what it says are radical “terrorists” as it has backed a ground offensive by the forces of its long-standing ally, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

The strikes also saw Russian warships in the Caspian Sea fire missiles at targets over 1,500 kilometres away for the first time ever in battle — a highly symbolic show of strength that has been interpreted as a clear statement.

“I cannot judge whether launching air strikes from the Caspian Sea made any sense militarily,” political analyst Grigory Mеlamedov wrote. “We showed our strength. To whom? To the Islamists? No. First of all, to the Americans.”

…

“He [Putin] wasn’t planning on living in isolation, on leading an outcast state,” said political analyst Alexander Baunov of the Carnegie Moscow Center.

That’s a globalist American organization, by the way, a part of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (Washington, DC).

They’re probably on the verge of getting run out of Moscow as the foreign change agents they are.

With more than 70 percent of the Russian population on board with the intervention, the West has questioned the true motives behind the campaign, accusing Moscow of bolstering Assad’s beleaguered regime by targeting opposition-held areas.

But quashing the Islamic State and other extremist groups, the stated objective of Russia’s campaign, is partly a broader attempt to compete with — and even intimidate — the West, analysts said.

“Rather than being primarily about Syria, or primarily about ISIS, this dispute is about a global principle,” Matthew Rojansky, the director of the Washington-based Kennan Institute, told AFP.

“The dispute has gone beyond the level of diplomatic manoeuvering and economic pressure. It has now gotten to the point of using military assets to make a point.“

Everyone is inclined to believe that, instinctively, so it seems like rather than reinforcing that inclination, pro-West media and media relations forces should instead be trying to negate it.

“He’s trying to show he can beat us by beating us” is not a good argument for any government to make, even if it’s true. Especially when what he’s doing – successfully bombing a terrorist group that is openly threatening Europe and America – is a pretty popular action among Western people.

But just generally, the idea that embracing weakness ever looks like anything other than weakness is ridiculous, and you people should really know better.

While power is instinctively likable, there is also nothing specifically unlikable about Russia, while there is something fundamentally hated about the West continuing to pour its resources into the Middle East and seeing nothing but chaos result.

So I understand that you guys are having a hard time formulating a narrative here.

The Washington Post, clever Jews that they are, is not going along with this narrative, however, and are instead calling Obama a coward for not threatening a war with Russia.

In an op-ed piece directed at Obama and authored by “The Editorial Board” yesterday entitled “Don’t greenlight Mr. Putin’s Syria project,” The Post team wrote:

PRESIDENT OBAMA’S response to Russia’s military campaign in Syria increasingly appears to boil down to “let them have it.” Mr. Obama has taken to lecturing Vladi­mir Putin that he is making a mistake that will result in a “quagmire,” while publicly assuring him that the United States will do nothing to contest the concerted assault the Russian president has launched against Syrian rebels, including those who have been trained and supplied by the United States. “We’re not going to make Syria into a proxy war between the United States and Russia,” Mr. Obama says. That sounds like a green light for Moscow to eliminate any alternative in Syria to the regime of Bashar al-Assad and the Islamic State, or ISIL.

“C’mon Obama, you little faggot. You just gonna let that White guy, over there in his White country, come along and bully you, you little bitch? Waddaya gunna doo? Hey, faggot. Waddaya gunna doo?”

While Netanyahu is keeping his mouth shut on the entire topic of Putin killing his dudes, it is obvious that the American wing of the Nation of Israel – American Jewry – is doing all it can to bully the establishment into starting a full-on war with Russia.

Yesterday, we reported that the Jew Adam Schiff, ranking member of the United States House Permanent Select Committee, which played a major role in formulating the CIA terrorist war against Assad, is calling for a no-fly zone over Syria, which would be a declaration of war on Syria, as the area still belongs to them.

Given that everyone can plainly see that Russia would not respect such an arrangement, it would also amount to a declaration of war on them as well.

Right now, Putin is – rightfully – using international law to justify his actions in Syria, noting that the leader of the country, who still rules the official government of the country, has asked him to come. The US has no legal right, whatsoever, to shoot down Russian planes over Syria.

You’ll note that not a single one of Putin’s critics ever brings up the legality of his actions – instead they just insult him, vaguely, as he slaughters their dudes.

Mr. Obama responded to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine by predicting it would be self defeating; 20 months later, Mr. Putin controls Crimea and a slice of eastern Ukraine and has won Western agreement for a political settlement that, if fully implemented, will cripple Ukraine’s democratic government. Now the White House suggests that Moscow’s offensive in Syria will also fail on its own. In the long run, that may be the case. But Mr. Obama’s policy risks a host of near-term catastrophes, from the further strengthening of the Islamic State to the elimination of any prospect of a Syrian political solution.

lol @ “Ukraine’s democratic government” installed by Western/Jew coup.

Also sort of lol’d a bit at “if we don’t stop Putin bombing ISIS it is going to strengthen ISIS.”

This whole concept of using the people that are actually on your side as the alleged threat that needs defeated is a rather incredible narrative. You kind have to be slightly awed by it, in the same way you are awed by the ability of Jews to openly promote pedophilia as a “sexual orientation.”

The number of Pentagon terrorists fighting Assad was recently estimated to be “4 or 5” while the estimated number of CIA terrorists fighting Assad was estimated at 10,000.

“We’re worried about ISIS, who is fighting Assad… so we’re gonna send in 10,000 guys against Assad – because he’s bad too somehow, probably – and 4 or 5 guys to fight ISIS.”

The president appears to have decided on a course of stepping up U.S. support for existing Syrian forces fighting the Islamic State in the eastern part of the country, including Kurds and Sunni tribes. “Equipment packages and weapons” will be provided “to a select group of vetted leaders and their units,” a Pentagon statement said Friday, “so that over time they can make a concerted push into territory still controlled by ISIL.”

Such an offensive toward the Islamic State capital of Raqqa would be welcome. But, combined with Mr. Obama’s refusal to assist the U.S.-allied forces now being pummeled by Russian missiles, it would have the effect of creating, de facto, the “coalition” Mr. Putin has been calling for, in which the United States and its allies join with Russia in fighting all forces that oppose the Assad government. It would force moderate Syrians who oppose the regime into the arms of the Islamic State and advance Mr. Putin’s aim of restoring Russia as a power in the region at U.S. expense.

Ha!

“Yes, fighting ISIS more effectively would be good. But, we don’t actually want to fight ISIS anyway, probably.”

These Jews, man. How do they have the nerve to publish this? Do they just think people won’t quite grasp what they are saying?

The United States need not go to war with Russia in order to take steps that counter Mr. Putin and preserve vital U.S. interests. Assistance to moderate forces fighting the Assad government should be accelerated: The rebels desperately need more U.S. antitank missiles. A safe zone should be established in northern Syria, in cooperation with Turkey, where civilians can be protected. Instead of lectures, Mr. Putin ought to be given red lines; without them, his aggression will escalate.

War with Russia. They actually felt the need to stipulate – “we are not technically calling for a war with Russia here, even though it sounds like that.”

What they did not explain is which “vital US interests” they are talking about – because there aren’t any. There are “vital Jewish interests.” The US has no real interests whatsoever in the entire Middle East, save trade in oil and, presumably, peace (the opposite of Israeli interests), which both makes the region stable for trade and negates the need for Europe to invite in millions of sand people.

The good news is, Obama is going to side with the guys saying “waahhhhh,” rather than the Jews saying “bomb him, Obama, you fag!”

Nothing can stop the Czar, and nothing can stop the Happenings that he has pulled out of his furry Russian hat.

America’s clock boy in chief, Barack Snackbar Obama, has devastated hundreds of children suffering from cancer by kicking them out of a park where they planned to hold a candlelight vigil to raise money, The Washington Post reports.

The group, which had too many White people in it, held a permit to host their event “A night of golden candles” in Lafayette Park near the White House. The children, many of which were on short release from hospital, were really looking forward to this thing.

But their little smiles turned to sad frowns when the Kenyan ordered his secret service goons to muscle them away.

The U.S. Secret Service ordered hundreds of parents and their cancer-stricken children out of Lafayette Square on Saturday night, barricading the park for at least two hours and disrupting the group’s plans for a candlelight vigil to raise awareness of and research funding for childhood cancer, participants said.

Some of the parents and children expressed hurt and disappointment that the Secret Service and Park Police, citing security precautions, virtually shut down part of a two-day event called CureFest for Childhood Cancer.

“We ended up waiting at the gates for two hours, and they never let us in,” said Natasha Gould, an 11-year-old from Canada who started a blog after being diagnosed with an inoperable brain tumor this year. “And to be clear, the entire crowd was half kids. I cried last night in my hotel room because it was my first CureFest, and I couldn’t believe people were acting like they don’t care about children.

According to a report in The Daily Caller, the group only decided to hold the candlelight vigil because Obama refused to allow the White House to light up in gold outside as a symbol of solidarity with children with cancer.

But that’s understandable, because these kids weren’t LGBT perverts and stuff; a group he was happy to cater to when the White House lit up in rainbow lights after the Supreme Court ruling on homo marriage.

So Bongo got his spooks to tell big lies to the cancer kids and their families.

Organizers, aligned with the Truth 365 grass-roots child-cancer advocacy program, had obtained a permit to hold “A Night of Golden Lights,” in which participants would light electric candles.

But as the closure continued on, some of the sick children, fatigued by the wait or the need to receive medication, had to return to their hotel rooms, organizers said. Others began crying, and some parents became enraged. Attendees said the group of at least 700 people was not allowed access to personal items they left behind, such as chairs and blankets.

Police officers and agents on the scene told some parents that the closure was necessary because President Obama had left the White House from an entrance near the square to address the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation’s annual gala.

But what these spoiled little cancer brats probably didn’t know was that Obammy most likely had clock boy around for Skittles and wanted to show off his awesome power. Still, if they were a good color like black or brown, he would’ve let them play on the White House lawn with their homemade clock-bombs.