Breaking! Russian General Who Told The World About The Ukrainian / US Backed Bio-Weapons Labs Assassinated In Russia.

NATO/Ukraine Are The Prime Suspects AS Russia Says It Will Retaliate.

Watch And Spread Our Livestream: https://t.co/c7l7bOGTo1 pic.twitter.com/SnfKjNCnSA

— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) December 18, 2024

Alex Jones is really looking like some kind of apocalypse general.

I’m thinking of like, someone who leads a faction in one of the Fallout games, you know?

RT:

Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev on Wednesday slammed British daily The Times for justifying the assassination of Lt. Gen. Igor Kirillov, who headed Russia’s Radiological, Chemical, and Biological Defense Forces. Medvedev criticized the editors as “lousy jackals” who are part of a hybrid war against Russia.

In an article on Tuesday, the UK outlet claimed that its sources within Ukraine’s security services admitted responsibility for the general’s assassination. It went on to describe the incident as “a legitimate act of defense by a threatened nation.”

“It’s impossible to ignore the editorial published in The Times, where the bastards called the terrorist attack on Igor Kirillov and his assistant a ‘legitimate act of defense’,” Medvedev, who currently serves as deputy head of the Russian Security Council, said in a Telegram post.

“All NATO decision-makers from countries that provided military assistance to Bandera Ukraine are participating in a hybrid or conventional war against Russia… All these individuals can and should be considered legitimate military targets for the Russian state,” Medvedev said, adding that the people “who committed crimes against Russia” always have accomplices, including in the media.

“And they, too, are now legitimate military targets. These may include the lousy jackals from The Times, who cowardly hid behind an editorial… So, be careful! After all, a lot can happen in London,” he warned.

If Russia starts assassinating journalists, that will be very hilarious.

They probably won’t do that, but just threatening to do it is hilarious.

I think this is the first time a government threatened to start assassinating foreign journalist. A lot of countries have done that, especially the Ukraine, but I don’t think any top government official has ever said they should start doing that.

If you were curious why Igor Kirillov was just assassinated, watch this video.

In August 2023, Kirillov outlined how the US and Big Pharma “rule the world” by “manufacturing biological crises”.

He also discussed how all of this evidence has been submitted to the UN many times,… pic.twitter.com/EMTVTfrGnl

— Clandestine (@WarClandestine) December 17, 2024

Wonder how much the #IntegrityInitiative paid out for this one? pic.twitter.com/ky1DVQfWUW

— Johanna Ross (@shottlandka) December 23, 2018

Everyone knows I’m a Russian shill, so maybe when I say this stuff it doesn’t carry the weight it should. But the Russian hacking bullshit is literally the biggest scam since the Holocaust.

Or perhaps I should say: the biggest scam since global warming.

This is just not real. What they are saying is made up. All of it.

And the proof – other than the fact that there is no proof to support the initial claim – is that it just keeps getting goofier.

RT:

The Times has hit a new Russia-bashing low, publishing a hit piece on the Moscow funded outlet Sputnik. The ‘name and shame’ article lists eight employees of Sputnik, complete with their photos and full names.

The story published on Sunday by one of the most respectable British newspapers is your usual attack on Russia and its foreign outreach efforts, described, of course, as propaganda. Technically it reports on the controversy over Integrity Initiative, the UK-funded psyop pushing London-favored narratives under the guise of fighting ‘Russian disinformation’. But it also focuses on the British-based branch of Sputnik, a news website and internet radio station funded by Moscow.

Halfway through the story you find a collage of eight employees of Sputnik: Some of them from management, some correspondents and one who is the head of the IT department, complete with their full names. The Times also gives an approximate location of Sputnik’s office in Edinburgh.

A possible reason for that? Sputnik – so the Times says – was “among the first to report details of the hack” of Integrity Initiative. “It has fuelled suspicion that Russia was behind the hack and used its media outlets to amplify its impact,” according to the Times.

Okay now let me get this straight: the Russians are such hacker geniuses that no one on earth can catch them in the act. Despite being accused of hacking literally the entire world, there is no evidence of them ever doing it once.

And yet, they are so stupid that they rush to report on their own hacking operations before anyone else to “amplify” the impact?

Why?

And how does news reporting “amplify the impact” of a hacking operation?

I can’t see if the Times article explains how that works, because all but the first three paragraphs are behind a paywall.

The Times:

Russians who live in Scotland and engage in “information warfare” to destabilise Britain should face having their assets seized, according to a leading MSP.

There is mounting suspicion that the Kremlin sponsored last month’s cyber attack on the Institute for Statecraft (IFS), a think-tank set up to counter Russia’s disinformation war and funded to the tune of more than £2m by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

Russia’s English-speaking news channel RT (formerly known as Russia Today) and Sputnik, an internet radio station based in Edinburgh, were among the first to report details of the hack, which was mounted on November 5. It has fuelled suspicion that Russia was behind the hack and used its media outlets to amplify its impact.

Obviously, this was a think-tank set up to attack Russia, so a Russian media outlet is going to be covering that closely. Also, they are “among the first” to report on it, not “the first.” Most likely, this is because Sputnik runs like a blog, and they can very quickly put up the details of an event from another source and get an article up within minutes of when news breaks.

Here is the story in question, from the 15th of December.

All they did was summarize documents released by hackers that ARE ABOUT AN ANTI-RUSSIAN GROUP SET UP TO FIGHT THEM SPECIFICALLY.

The whole “integrity in media” term is about combating “Russian propaganda,” which means RT and Sputnik.

Furthermore, the hacked documents in question were about a BRITISH PLOT TO PROVOKE WAR WITH RUSSIA – BY PUTTING UNDERWATER MINES OFF THE COAST OF CRIMEA!

Who is at war with whom here?

Britain’s top cop wants to pay off White police officers and hire blacks and other minorities, to deal with what he calls “institutional racism” within the Metropolitan Police.

Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe, Britain’s most senior officer, says that the country should be “incentivising” (sic) older White police out of the force to balance the scales of justice, The Times reports.

This verbal proof of both his insanity and personal treason comes on the heels of a daft reality documentary from The BBC (Bolshevik Broadcasting Corporation) entitled The Met. This gritty, warts and all series deals with the aftermath of the shooting of a filthy black drug-dealing council-estate Tottenham gangster named Mark Duggan, which sparked senseless riots to mirror that of Baltimore.

No mention of the Rotherham child exploitation scandal in which the police turned a blind eye as curry-reeking Muslim men of the Pakistani community trafficked in under-age White girls. Nope, just White guilt over a black teen whose criminal record was as long as an Amazonian python. Bernie hung his head in White shame and sobbed, “If other people think we are institutionally racist, then we are. You’re very much more likely to be stopped and searched if you’re a young black man.”

He then curled into a helpless fetal ball, bawling like an infant over these poor unjustly treated blacks strutting passed him with looted flat-screen TVs, and bags of drugs for sale. He wailed, “We see lack of representation in many fields, of which the police are one.”

Sadly for the self-hating White, Sir Bernie’s hopes of seeing a police force filled with child rapists and drug dealers like Duggan are slim since his Met force is facing major cuts to financing over the next few years.

This controversy centers round the idiotic show, which you can guarantee is depicted out of context and with the usual BBC bias. The first episode also features Chief Superintendent Victor Olisa, a senior darkie in the force, who was rushed in after the riots.

As in the case of Mark Brown, a verdict of lawful killing was returned in the matter of the Duggan shooting. This didn’t deter protesters who really only wanted to burn things down and smash other people’s property. Olisa is shown talking to some of this trash outside Tottenham Police Station as they quizzed him on whether he only got the job on account of his skin color.

Proving the nobility of the black man is far greater than the hateful White who invaded Britain and stole it from the colored folks, he told the film crew, “I have got a colleague who works in a neighborhood borough that is Jewish and the Jewish community embrace him with open arms.”

As they wept like emancipated prisoners, he went on, “I work in a borough with a sizable black African community and I think I get more of a battering here than when I worked in a borough with a sizable number of BNP people. It boils down to race.”

At which point they stopped weeping, because he was basically saying that blacks act like blacks no matter what the color of the cop wearing the uniform.

Congratulations!

In a Times article you have to pay money to read, Nigel Farage was given the title “Briton of the Year.”

RT:

The Times named Nigel Farage of the UK Independence Party ‘Briton of the Year,’ calling him a game-changing politician who broke into and shaped the country’s politics in 2014. The decision prompted a storm of controversy in the media and on Twitter.

Farage has managed to lure many disillusioned voters away from the political establishment and has exploited every opportunity he can – which may mean his party will hold the balance of power in Westminster in the coming election.

This did not go unnoticed with the influential newspaper The Times, which announced its decision to honor Farage “for good and ill.”

One can have their complaints about Nigel, but one cannot say that this does not signal a very good turn in the minds of the British people who are fed up with being silenced and told they have no choice on the issue of the invasion.

Despite a worldwide awakening on the scale of the longstanding propaganda against the Syrian government, the British media is still peddling monstrous lies to the public, casually placing the blame on the government of Bashar al Assad.

Excerpt from: Assad’s Snipers Target Unborn Babies by Lucy Bannerman, The Times, 19 October 2013:

Pregnant women in Syria are being picked off by snipers in a sickening war game in which their unborn babies appear to be used for target practice, according to a British surgeon.

David Nott, who has just spent five weeks volunteering in a Syrian hospital, said that he and his despairing colleagues started to notice a disturbing pattern among the women and children who were being shot as they ran the daily gauntlet across a divided zone to buy food and supplies in a major city.

“One day it would be shots to the groin. The next, it would only be the left chest. The day after, we would see no chest wounds; they were all neck [wounds],” he said in an interview with The Times. “From the first patients that came in in the morning, you could almost tell what you would see for the rest of the day. It was a game. We heard the snipers were winning packets of cigarettes for hitting the correct number of targets.”

He said local rumours suggested that the snipers were mercenaries from China and Azerbaijan, working for the Assad regime. This cannot be verified.

Mr Nott has been volunteering as an emergency surgeon in war zones in countries such as Bosnia, Libya, Chad, Sudan and the Democratic Republic of Congo for the past 20 years. However, he said that Syria was the only place in which he had witnessed civilians, and in particular pregnant women, being targeted.

On one day, more than half a dozen pregnant women were caught in sniper fire. On another day, two consecutive patients were heavily pregnant women. Both survived but their babies were dead on arrival.

In one case, a baby had a bullet in its brain. “The women were all shot through the uterus, so that must have been where they were aiming for. I can’t even begin to tell you how awful it was. Usually, civilians are caught in the crossfire. This is the first time I’ve ever seen anything like this. This was deliberate. It was hell beyond hell.”

Read More