This could be a chicken-egg type scenario, where girls who are whores are more likely to be depressed.

However, all women are whores, and most teenage girls are put on birth control by their whore mothers.

A lot of this is about women not wanting to experience the troubles of being on their period. Birth control usually stops women from having periods at all. This creates massive endocrine disorders, which are clearly the leading cause of breast cancer, but also cause psychological distress.

It’s another big pharma scam, basically.

New York Post:

Women taking oral contraceptive pills may have an increased risk of depression — especially shortly after starting on the pill.

That’s one of the findings from a large study of more than 264,000 women, which also finds that teenage girls are at the highest risk.

In fact, women who were teenagers when they began to use birth control pills had a 130% higher rate of depression.

The increased rate among adult users was 92%, according to the study authors.

There are multiple campaigns across all the formerly-civilized world to give this stuff out like candy

“The powerful influence of contraceptive pills on teenagers can be ascribed to the hormonal changes caused by puberty,” Therese Johansson, of the Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology at Uppsala University in Sweden, said in a news release.

“As women in that age group have already experienced substantial hormonal changes, they can be more receptive not only to hormonal changes but also to other life experiences,” Johansson added.

This new study, published in Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, adds to previous research that found a link between oral contraceptive use and depression.

A 2016 report in JAMA Psychiatry revealed that the use of hormonal contraceptives was often linked to a subsequent use of prescription antidepressants or a diagnosis of depression.

And in 2019, another study found that 16-year-old girls taking oral contraceptives reported more crying, sleep irregularities and eating problems than teenage girls of the same age who didn’t use oral contraceptives.

The latest study used data from the UK Biobank, a biomedical database with genetic and health information from more than half a million participants across the UK.

The researchers studied combination contraceptive pills, which contain progestogen, a compound resembling the hormone progesterone, and estrogen.

The study revealed that the increase in rates of depression declined when women continued using contraceptive pills after the first two years.

But teenage users of contraceptive pills still had an increased rate of depression even after they stopped using the pill. That effect was not seen in adult users of the pill.

Yes, the damage to your hormonal system is permanent.

It’s similar to when men do steroids. Recovery is very difficult, and you’ll never be back to 100% if you’ve taken them for an extended period.

The article goes on to falsely claim that “most women” will never “experience adverse side-effects.”

News articles like this, and often or usually the studies themselves, are designed to “get out in front” of issues that people are already talking about. For example, with the so-called “coronavirus vaccine,” everyone was talking about heart problems associated with it, so they came out and said “yes, there are sometimes heart problems, but it’s very rare and you really have nothing to worry about.”

Birth control is never safe, under any circumstances, and it should be banned. If these sluts want to guzzle cock, they should be forced to deal with the consequnces.

“Male birth control” is being promoted by the vaginal establishment as an “equality” project.

Women won’t ever actually stop taking birth control, but good little goy men will take this “male birth control” to prove their submissiveness to women.

This is totally dehumanizing and it is probably going to cause serious fertility problems for men in the same way that normal birth control causes fertility problems for women.

“Controlling birth” was never the man’s job. Men will always, as a rule, have sex if a woman wants to have sex (with the rise in fatness, that is becoming less true I hope, but it is a biological rule).

“Guarding sex” was historically the singular duty of women. Like literally, that was it. Now, women have said that having one single duty is much too much for them, and they simply will not tolerate any form of duty. Their only single duty must be shifted to men.

Shifting the guarding of sex to men has been going on for a while with the consent movement and this whole “rape” gibberish. “Male birth control” takes this into a whole new realm.

Euronews:

Picture this: A man walks into a pharmacy and buys “the male pill” as the burden of birth control is finally more equally shared among genders.

Scientists have been working on an oral male contraceptive for decades – and they’re now one step closer after an experimental drug was found to temporarily block sperm in mice and prevent pregnancies in preclinical trials.

In a paper published this week in Nature Communications, scientists from Cornell University said their findings could be a “game changer” for male contraception.

Other than condoms, which have existed for about 2,000 years – with their early versions being made from animal intestines or oiled silk paper – men haven’t had many reliable options to prevent their sperm from impregnating their partner unless they get a vasectomy.

Previous studies on experimental male contraceptives have achieved impressive success rates of up to 94 per cent, but most of them impact sperm development, meaning it takes months for the contraceptive to be reliable, and it also takes weeks to reverse its effect.

Dr Lonny Levin, co-author of the Weill Cornell Medicine study, says that potential contraceptives for men must clear a much higher bar for safety and side effects.

Because men don’t bear the risks associated with carrying a pregnancy, he explained, the field assumes men will have a low tolerance for potential side effects.

…

The researchers at Weill Cornell Medicine discovered that a single dose of an inhibitor called TDI-11861 immobilises sperm in mice for up to two and a half hours.

In their experiments, male mice showed normal mating behaviour yet did not impregnate females in 52 different mating attempts after they were treated with the drug, which inhibits an enzyme called soluble adenylyl cyclase (sAC).

Three hours later, sperm in mice started regaining motility, and within 24 hours, nearly all sperm recovered normal movement.

“Our inhibitor works within 30 minutes to an hour,” Balbach said. “Every other experimental hormonal or nonhormonal male contraceptive takes weeks to bring sperm count down or render them unable to fertilise eggs,” he added.

The whole concept of “birth control” is so nasty and anti-human and in fact anti-life.

Throughout all of human history, children have been considered the greatest joy.

Imagine any other species of living thing saying “oh no, I’m pregnant! What a tragedy!”

Building a society around hating children is something only the Jews could have done. No one else, no matter how bad intentioned, ever would have thought of this.

One of the most important things to do nowadays is to figure out ways to prevent women from breeding. Because they need to spend more time in the workplace and increase the GDP, don’t cha know.

Daily Mail:

Women  may finally get to delete their daily birth control alarms in exchange for once-a-month contraception, a new study suggests.

Researchers at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) have developed a new pill that slowly releases a contraceptive drug over the course of 29 days in tests using pigs.

This is accomplished in part through the innovative design of a capsule that slowly unfolds inside the stomach.

This is the capsule:

It is made out of plastic so it can stay in the digestive tract for about a month, slowly releasing sterilization doses.

Missed doses of daily pills are a risk factor for unintended pregnancy, a public health concern most experts say is best combated with adoption of long-acting contraceptives.

Women bear the brunt of the burden of preventing unintended pregnancy in the US and around the world.

That’s like saying that women bear the brunt of the burden of taking care of their own bodies.

They are the ones with wombs and they are supposedly capable humans with agency and stuff, so why should the prevention of unwanted pregnancies be the responsibility of anyone else?

Unintended pregnancy fuels a cycle of poverty and is estimated to cost American taxpayers $21 billion, according to a 2015 Guttmacher Institute estimate.

Currently, nearly half – 45 percent – of pregnancies in the US are unintended.

If women are that unable to take care of their own bodies and prevent themselves from getting pregnant when they don’t want to be, then we should stop pretending that they have bodily autonomy.

They love to say “my body, my choice,” but they continue to prove that they’re incapable of managing their own bodies.

If men have to step up to help women not get pregnant, then men should have authority over the female body. Surely, they can’t be expected to have responsibility for something they have no control of.

Women’s health specialists advocate for long-acting forms of birth control like intrauterine devices (IUDs), the implant and the shot because they have lower failure rates than condoms or daily birth control pills.

…

The first challenge that faced the MIT team was keeping the capsule intact long enough in the stomach to continue to release all of its medication at once.

Acid in the stomach that digests food is highly corrosive.

By the end of two weeks, earlier iterations of the capsules had disintegrated.

The scientists went back to the drawing board and came up with a different pill using tougher polyeurothane – rubber-like material – formed into the shape of a star.

By creating, effectively, medical origami, the researchers were able to protect the medication from the harsh environment of the stomach.

It was able to withstand a whole month inside the digestive system.

Slowly the star-shaped drug unfolded, making it lodge into place, where it delivered the contraceptive to the pigs used in the study for nearly a month.

Once it’s ready for human use, the drug will be made in such a way that it simply goes the way of anything else we consume and no longer need: through the digestive tract and out.

On the one hand, women are encouraged to slut around and have random sexual encounters. On the other hand, they are also encouraged to work and to avoid motherhood.

The problem is that women are too dumb to avoid pregnancies on their own, even with all of the current contraceptive methods available to them.

To “fix” that, we’re going to see more and more foolproof methods getting further fool-proofed until they’re so fool-proofed that they can be considered retard-proofed.

Only then will women be truly empowered.

Despite hormones being known to mess with moods, the study doesn’t show that the pill itself caused the symptoms of depression — it just shows that girls on the pill are also more likely to be depressed, whatever the origin of the depression may be.

Nevertheless, this opens up the door for uncomfortable questions to be asked.

Daily Mail:

Teenage girls on the pill are more likely to suffer from symptoms linked to depression, according to a new study.

Researchers found that 16-year-olds taking oral contraceptives reported more depressive symptoms – such as crying and having problems with sleep and eating – than those that did not.

Doctors say depressive symptoms can be subtler than diagnosed clinical depression, but are much more common and nonetheless have a profound impact on someone’s quality of life.

Study author Dr Anouk de Wit, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in the US, said: ‘One of the most common concerns women have when starting the pill, and teens and their parents have when an adolescent is considering taking the pill, is about immediate depressive risks.

‘Most women first take an oral contraceptive pill as a teen.

…

The findings, published in JAMA Psychiatry, showed that, on average, 16-year-olds taking the pill had scores that were 21 percent higher than those who were not.

Specifically, teens taking the pill reported more crying, oversleeping and more eating problems than their counterparts.

‘Depressive symptoms are more prevalent than clinical depression and can have a profound impact on quality of life,’ said co-author Dr Hadine Joffe, also from Brigham.

‘Ours is the first study of this scale to dive deep into the more subtle mood symptoms that occur much more commonly than a depression episode but impact quality of life and are worrying to girls, women and their families.’

Teenage girls are at a higher risk of depression than their male counterparts, and even if their symptoms aren’t clinical, they may still disrupt school and work.

Why are 16-year-old girls even on the pill? Answering this question may shine some light on why 16-year-olds on the pill are more likely to be depressed.

Reproduction is a biological imperative. People are drawn to sex because sex is about reproduction. The fact that technology allowed us to separate sex from reproduction doesn’t change that.

Women who make themselves infertile, at a subconscious or deep enough level, must have some kind of “this is wrong, I messed up” feeling. Sterile sex is a new thing. In the past, sex not resulting in babies meant infertility and infertility meant the end of bloodlines and the inability to continue the species.

We are naturally averse to infertility. We feel disgust when seeing physical signs of infertility, like obese bodies, deformities, and ugly skin. “Infertility is bad” is a built-in premise of living organisms.

What makes people think that we have adapted to separate, at a subconscious level, the “temporary” and self-inflicted infertility caused by contraceptives from the permanent, scary form of infertility?

No matter how attractive you are to women, the more sex you have with them without getting them pregnant, the more likely this eerie infertility feeling will creep in and mess with their attraction and your relationships.

Women not in a relationship, having “casual” sex with multiple partners, are more vulnerable to this because the eerie feeling points to them being the infertile ones, considering that they’ve “tried” with multiple men and are still not producing babies.

Teenage girls are on the pill because they want to have sex without it resulting in babies, but the reason they want to have sex in the first place is that their biology says it’s time to start having babies.

It is a conflicting goal, despite whatever conscious rationalizations they may have.

This thing created and relentlessly shilled by Jews is likely responsible for destroying relationships and ruining women. Unbelievable.

Daily Mail:

The pill may blur a woman’s judgement and even impact her relationships, research suggests.

A study found taking the oral contraceptive causes subtle emotional changes to a woman’s brain.

This makes her 10 per cent less likely to be able to read other people’s facial expressions and feelings.

Although unclear why this occurs, the pill’s impact on a woman’s oestrogen and progesterone levels is thought to influence her empathy.

Anyone who’s been around women before and after they started taking the pill knows their behavior changed. Maybe not too much at first, but enough to be noticeable. From the way they think, to their emotions, and even the music they listen to.

Hormones do influence behavior. One needs only to look at bodybuilders injecting themselves with synthetic hormones and their rage incidents which are usually followed up by emotional breakdowns and quite a bit of crying.

lol he says “bodybuilding taught me how to be strong mentally, physically, and emotionally” while crying.

“I was crying on stage, I have been crying off stage, I don’t want to cry again” then starts crying again.

We know the pill and hormones in general influence behavior and emotions.

The real question is how deep does it go?

The research was carried out by the University of Greifswald in Germany and led by Dr Alexander Lischke, from the department of biological and clinical psychology.

‘More than 100 million women worldwide use oral contraceptives, but remarkably little is known about their effects on emotion, cognition and behaviour,’ Dr Lischke said.

‘However, coincidental findings suggest that oral contraceptives impair the ability to recognise emotional expressions of others, which could affect the way users initiate and maintain intimate relationships.’

Dr Lischke argues that on top of birth control, a lot of emphasis is placed on the benefits of the pill – such as improving acne and easing heavy periods – but the downsides are often glazed over.

I’ve known 14-year-old girls who were put on the pill by their doctors to “fight acne.” It’s clear that women are generally encouraged to jump on the pill for whatever reason they can think of.

Painful periods? Pill.

Acne? Pill.

Parents worried about their girl starting to get sexually active? Pill.

Going to college? Pill.

Having sex? Pill.

But it goes beyond being a financial benefit for the Jews and even beyond making it easier for women to slut around. It’s not only about turning our women into whores. Evidence suggests it’s about destroying their capacity to bond and turning them into insufferable beings no men would want to be around longer than they need to in order to bust a nut.

Isn’t that what’s happening?

It’s touted as a way for women to gain control over their reproductive system, but isn’t that what keeping their legs closed is for? Even if they have sex, there are viable alternatives to the pill that don’t have the nasty hormonal “side” effects, such as intrauterine devices.

But hey, those could fall off or something. Better to just swallow a pill every day.

It’s known that the pill shrinks women’s brains.

Huffington Post, April 9, 2015:

In a study conducted on 90 women, neuroscientists at UCLA found that two key brain regions, the lateral orbitofrontal cortex and the posterior cigulate cortex, were thinner in women who used oral contraception than in women who did not.

The lateral orbitofrontal cortex plays an important role in emotion regulation and responding to rewards, while the posterior cigulate cortex is involved with inward-directed thought, and shows increased activity when we recall personal memories and plan for the future.

Changes in the lateral orbitofrontal cortex could be responsible for the increased anxiety and depressive symptoms that some women experience when they start taking the Pill.

“Some women experience negative emotional side effects from taking oral contraceptive pills, although the scientific findings investigating that have been mixed,” Nicole Petersen, a neuroscientist at UCLA and the study’s lead author, told The Huffington Post. “So it’s possible that this change in the lateral orbitofrontal cortex may be related to the emotional changes that some women experience when using birth control pills.”

Scientists have not yet determined if these neurological changes are permanent, or if they only last while a woman is on the Pill.

It can also shrink their ovaries.

Science Daily, July 1, 2014:

Now, the Danish study has found that measurements of AMH and AFC were 19% and 16% respectively lower in Pill users than in those not taking the Pill. In addition, ovarian volume was also significantly smaller — by between 29 and 52%, with the greatest reductions seen in the group aged 19-29.9 years.

What may be even more scary than some whores getting their brains and ovaries shrunk by the pill is how you’re likely to be drinking and showering on trace amounts of the pill.

Live Science, May 23, 2012:

After the active ingredient in most birth control pills has done its duty preventing pregnancy, it begins a second life as a pollutant that can harm wildlife in waterways.

Not only is ethinyl estradiol quite potent — creating “intersex” fish and amphibians — but it is very difficult to remove from wastewater, which carries it into natural waterways. 

He tried to warn you.

Since women around the planet take the pill, this is a global problem. The European Union is the first entity to seriously consider mandating the removal of ethinyl estradiol, also known as EE2, from wastewater. However, as researchers pointed out in Thursday’s (May 24) issue of the journal Nature, the question of whether to remove the pollutant is not simple.

What? You don’t want foreign estrogen to enter your body?

In that case:

Charcoal-based filtering is the most effective method for removing chemicals such as EE2 from wastewater. Other methods may also be effective, but they, too, would require some financial investment, Jobling told LiveScience.

The water filter merchant wasn’t so wrong after all, was he?