The primary defeat of GOP House Majority Leader Eric Cantor by David Brat has done more than just strike a blow against the Open Border machinations of Conservatism Inc. It has blazed the trial for a populist “National Conservative” movement that uses the anti-corporate, anti-immigration, anti-Establishment tactics of David Brat. Unless of course, the Beltway Right (with an assist from the Leftist Main Stream Media) can pervert it into yet another dead end.

The attempt to misdirect the conversation away from immigration has already begun. Conservatism Inc.’s media mouthpieces are doing this in three ways.

• First, they pretend Eric Cantor’s defeat was not actually about immigration or was just as much about something else.

A typical example: George Will saying that the Import-Export Bank was “equally important” as immigration in Cantor’s defeat. (For a laugh, check out 1:35 in the video when Brit Hume is caught giving a sidelong “Is this guy serious?” glance to the camera.) [Will’s Take: Cantor Lost Because He Was the ‘Nexus’ Between House Republicans and Wall Street, National Review, June 15, 2014]

• Second, they chalk it up to the “Tea Party” or some other label that can be assimilated under Conservatism Inc. Cantor lost, we are told, because he wasn’t “conservative” enough. The Leftist MSM assists with this, eager to further the narrative of an “extreme” GOP. [Warren: House Majority Eric Cantor’s defeat shows Tea Party not dead, by James Warren, NY Daily News, June 11, 2014]

But the difficulty here: the Tea Party national groups didn’t, in fact, do much to help David Brat–even though they are gleefully fundraising off his victory.

• Finally, and most importantly, they praise Brat and his agenda – with the exception of immigration

A typical example: Larry Kudlow playing an Aw Shucks routine supporting “my kinda guy” David Brat because of his support for free-market capitalism. However, because of Brat’s opposition to Amnesty, Kudlow says he is “violating his free-market economic principles”–and concludes his post-Cantormageddon shilling for more immigration. [Kudlow: David Brat, Right on Free-Market Economics, The News Herald, June 16, 2014]

This last tactic is probably the most common and certainly the way that the Conservative Inc. has evaded the immigration issue in the past. Republican candidates now at least feel the need to pledge rhetorical support for border security when they are up for re-election. But many Conservatism Inc. operatives seem genuinely not to have thought about the immigration issue and certainly don’t consider it very important. For Conservatism Inc.’s institutions and hacks, immigration is only one issue, far behind things like bombing Iran (or allying with them these days) or pushing for capital gains taxes.

What’s worse, some Conservatism Inc. operatives, and almost all the rising libertarians within the conservative movement, feel allowed to attack even rhetorical support for border security.

As an example, despite Brat being an Ayn Rand-loving economics professor, Students for Liberty attacked him with its usual lack of self-awareness, bemoaning his “dogmatism.” SFL says Brat’s victory is “hardly a win for libertarianism” because Brat defends border security, which is “unsympathetic to humanity and illogical to economic processes.” [A Libertarian Response to Eric Cantor’s Defeat, Kelly Barber quoting Suzanne Schaefer, June 12, 2014]

As always nowadays with Establishment libertarians, cultural leftism comes first. But none of this will keep Students for Liberty from having trouble being invited to CPAC, while immigration patriots will be ruthlessly excluded.

What these means: border security’s fate is tied to a host of distracting, unpopular, or even stupid issues. Immigration patriots often have no choice except to vote Republican, meaning that immigration reform is solely associated with the Stupid Party. Immigration patriotism thus ends up reinforcing the Beltway Right, while the Beltway Right either does nothing that actually secures the country or even makes things worse.

But Brat’s victory could be the beginning of a transformation. Ironically, it was the liberal economist Paul Krugman who accurately identified what is happening in the New York Times.

Krugman crudely but effectively caricatures “movement conservatism” as

…an interlocking set of institutions and alliances that won elections by stoking cultural and racial anxiety but used these victories mainly to push an elitist economic agenda, meanwhile providing a support network for political and ideological loyalists.

By rejecting Mr. Cantor, the Republican base showed that it has gotten wise to the electoral bait and switch, and, by his fall, Mr. Cantor showed that the support network can no longer guarantee job security. For around three decades, the conservative fix was in; but no more. .

[The Fix Isn’t In, June 12, 2014. VDARE.com links added]

The base knows the GOP Leadership really wants cheap labor to its donors, rather than serving the interests of the people who elected it.

Of course, Krugman doesn’t actually want the GOP serving the interests of its constituents – he concludes that an “ugly political scene is about to get even uglier.” And he is wrong when he identifies the new focus as “social issues.”

Professional homosexual faux conservative Andrew Sullivan is closer to the mark when he cautions his fellow members of the parasitic chattering class to understand that we are living in a “powerfully populist moment.” He writes,

The economy is failing to help middle- and working-class people make headway, while the wealthiest are living higher on the hog than since the days of robber barons…And the ace card for the populist right, rather than the populist left, is immigration.

[Don’t Under-Estimate the Power of Right-Wing Populism, The Dish, June 11, 2014. Emphasis added.]

Again, Sullivan, like Krugman, is more concerned about keeping the rubes in line than actually helping them. However, he does fret that if even a “dorky populist” like David Brat can capitalize on public resentment against K Street, Wall Street, and the Open Borders Establishment, a “gifted demagogue” like Texas Senator Ted Cruz could wreak havoc.

Unlike Sullivan, Krugman, and the rest of the MSM gatekeepers, immigration patriots can be forgiven for thinking that a populist movement is an opportunity to be welcomed, rather than a problem to be managed.

But there is danger as well as opportunity. The Republican Party has mastered the art of fueling patriotic resentment into dead ends. Thus conservative-leaning journalist Ron Fournier, for example, says Cantor’s defeat was about a new “populism” centered around

…a pullback from the rest of the world…a desire to go after big banks and other large financial institutions, elimination of corporate welfare, reducing special deals for the rich, pushing back on the violation of the public’s privacy, and reducing the size of government.

[Elite Beware: Eric Cantor’s Defeat May Signal a Populist Revolution, National Journal, June 11, 2014]

Immigration is not even mentioned.

Andrew Sullivan notes one possible Presidential candidate who could take advantage of all of this – Treason Lobby truckler Senator Rand Paul, who has now almost totally erased the memory of his father’s brief glimmer of immigration patriotism. [Don’t Under-Estimate The Power of Right Wing Populism, Ctd., June 12, 2014] If that indeed happens, the result would be predictable – business as usual for the Beltway Right, with the rubes fooled once again by Paul’s libertarian rhetoric, and Leftist reporters reassured that we won’t get “ugly” politics that actually address the interests of the historic American nation.

The importance of political movements is not what they actually say, but what they can lead to. More Tea Party faux populism or Rand Paul PC Libertarianism will just lead to the same dead end. What is needed is a figure who will seize this populist moment – either out of conviction or opportunism – and turn it into a National Conservative movement. This means placing income inequality, hostility to the financial and political establishment, and above all, immigration at the center of a campaign.

Even if a politician like Ted Cruz capitalizes on these issues for cynical reasons, it could break away an entire generation of conservatives from the mindless orthodoxies that have led the Republican Party to disaster. It could lead to a genuine patriotic movement.

Brat has shown the opportunity is there. Leftist reporters are sounding the alarm. The opportunity is there. Will anyone seize it?

Even with the disgusting and evil Jew Eric Cantor having lost his seat due to his obsession with flooding the United States with hordes of primitive non-White immigrants, it appears that there is no possible scenario wherein he will be replaced with someone who does not share his belief that the American people deserved to be overrun and destroyed by invading hordes.

One such person seeking the position of House Majority Leader is the weird-faced Puerto Rican party animal Raul Labrador, an Idaho Rep who bills himself as “Tea Party,” but is a member of the “Gang of Eight” led by Jew Schumer which is trying to legalize all invaders and bring the entire remaining population of Latin America into the United States.

I’m not sure he’ll be the pick, but he definitely fits the program.

NBC:

In his website, Labrador stated why he wants to run for Majority Leader.

“Republicans need to address the growing challenges of immobility amongst the poor, insecurity in the middle class and stop protecting the special interests at the top. We must ensure every American has an equal opportunity to succeed, that they are treated fairly not only by the laws we pass in Congress, but by our political system,” he stated.

Rep. Kevin McCarthy, a Republican from California and the current House majority whip, is considered to be the favorite to replace Cantor.

On Friday at Idaho’s Republican convention Kentucky Republican Senator Rand Paul offered his support for Labrador. “I think he would make a great leader,” he said.

Well, if Rand Paul supports him, he must be okay.  That Rand Paul libertarian guy is always on the ball, praying at the wall.

I’ve been saying on this blog for years that we must expand our interests and we must work with people who are implicitly white, and work with them on things like jobs, localized food and so on.

I have long advocated that if you can move somewhere, go to Eugene, Oregon, or Portland (Portlandia!) or boston MA or Austin TX. Some place where there’s lots of microbreweries and people in skinny jeans riding one speed bicycles. Go to a Hipster Central, and participate in their Hipster Local Resilient Transition Town Economy. Learn skills like microbrewing, fixing bicycles, help run one of their hippie dippie businesses for cheap so you learn, learn what to do, learn organization. You can save yourself a lot of wheel reinventing by going to Hipster Central, and you can learn how it’s done and teach the rest of us. Go turn Kalispell into a WN version of Eugene.

In other words, go become a Steampunk!

It’s pretty obvious that this is Leonard Zeskin’s biggest fear, ergo it’s what we should do. This is a textbook example of Open Source Intelligence. You guys think I’m talking fantasy when I say you could be spies? Gathering intelligence these days is as easy a good keyword search on youtube. No cloaks or daggers or listening devices needed.

That’s your mission. Create that broad appeal. Work on the problems that are pressing on people — namely the economy. Where to start? Go hang out in Portland, or a place like that — Boston MA Austin TX Eugene OR, Northampton MA and I’m sure many other places.

That’s what it looks like. Fun!

A lot of people think this struggle has to be Sturm and Drang. It has to be going around getting people as angry as you are. That’s WN 1.0.

Fuck that. Why not associate the pro-white cause with enjoying each other’s company and being happy to be together? And as a group, let’s resist those uncool buzz kill people who somehow say we are bad for our associations? Not with hot lead cold steel but with a mocking attitude where we pretend to obey but not really.

Don’t lead with White identity. Lead with a zillion other things. Your White identity is your secret weapon. Let me tell you about what 10 years of hidden white identity is like. You don’t take any shit. That energy blocked up inside you makes you psychically strong. You learn to talk about WN without talkign about it directly. Why do banks pay less than 1% interest when inflation is at least 3 or 4 percent? But hedge funds make billion, while they have broken a public utility, like water or electricity?

Taqqiyah White identity makes you intellectually intimidating to Paychex Liberalz because you don’t take them on directly, you concern troll them. Concern trolling is hard to get away with on message boards, but in person, few people are ready for it.

I tell you, I meet a lot of people but have yet to meet a real liberal, maybe because they are all drinking and telling the truth. They are a liberal by day, but get them out with Dionysius, and out comes the true self. I met a Human Resources Director who agreed with racist things her husband said! Oh my D-g! Imagine that, a Human Resources Director!

Become useful.

Have fun.

Learn to be funny. Doing a service job will help you with that.

Help people speak the truth of their soul when they get some booze in them.

Concern troll any remaining liberals, if they are still liberals when they drink.

Be like Ramzpaul.

Let’s make the Paychex Liberalz that hate white people so much into the most uncool douche nozzles that ever walked the earth. Let’s do real economic solutions for our people. We’re already halfway there my friends.

In response to President Obama’s state of the union address, “Tea Party” Senator Mike Kyle has claimed that “inequality” is caused by “big government”, implying that small government conservatives are the true egalitarians:

Today, Americans know in their hearts that something is wrong.  Much of what is wrong relates to the sense that the ‘American Dream’ is falling out of reach for far too many of us. We are facing an inequality crisis — one to which the President has paid lip-service, but seems uninterested in truly confronting or correcting… But where does this new inequality come from? From government — every time it takes rights and opportunities away from the American people and gives them instead to politicians, bureaucrats, and special interests.

This weak, pathetic response to what is happening to our country clearly shows how incapable kosher conservatism is of actually fixing our problems.

While economic questions are important, race is far and away the most pressing issue in contemporary politics. The White race is facing genocide at the hands of the Jews, and the principal weapon used by our enemies is the idol of “equality”. When kosher conservatives justify their position by claiming that they will bring about equality, they worship the idol built by Jews and liberals. As long as they engage in this worship, they will never be able to gain victory.

A genuinely right-wing worldview proudly proclaims that excellence is far more valuable than equality, and that egalitarianism is evil because it lessens human excellence through its mad drive to destroy all distinctions and hierarchy.

Liberals damage human excellence through forced integration and affirmative action, while kosher conservatives damage human excellence through their push for unrestricted immigration in the name of “free markets”. Although they are portrayed as bitter enemies, both sides promote agendas that will lead to the destruction of the White race, and both sides justify their agendas in the name of “equality”.

In order to conquer our enemies, we first must smash the idol of equality in the minds of our folk. We demand the cultivation and celebration of superiority. We demand the preservation of the White race.

The Huffington Post recently reported that they have found yet another act of “racism” at a Tea Party rally:

Earlier this week, tea party activists and GOP lawmakers gathered near the Capitol to rail against an immigration reform bill passed by the Senate.
When Ken Crow — a co-founder of the Tea Party Community — stepped up to the microphone, however, George Zornick of The Nation said he was taken aback by the talk of “breeding” and racial purity that followed.

At this point in the article I was ready for a quote from Mr. Crow in which he praises the superiority of the Aryan race.  I was rather disappointed when I got to the actual words of his speech:

“From those incredible blood lines of Thomas Jefferson and George Washington and John Smith. And all these great Americans, Martin Luther King. These great Americans who built this country. You came from them. And the unique thing about being from that part of the world, when you learn about breeding, you learn that you cannot breed Secretariat to a donkey and expect to win the Kentucky Derby. You guys have incredible DNA and don’t forget it.”

That’s right: it’s racist to claim that Americans are blessed with the DNA that produced Thomas Jefferson and Martin Luther King.   Crow is merely claiming that people whose ancestors lived in America, regardless of their race, are somehow different from people who have just arrived.  This is enough to excite the thought police of the Left.  And while Crow’s attitude might be somewhat better than the globalist nonsense of the pro-amnesty crowd, it highlights the true race problem of the Tea Party: the failure to recognize that the white race must fight for its own interests.