All the world’s cucks lined up to denounce Richard Spencer for merely saying “hail victory” at the NPI conference. Droves of them have tried to derail what Spencer achieved: a massive coup against the media narrative that everyone who uses National Socialist imagery is some sort of toothless hick who has become deranged through the chronic abuse of methamphetamine.

People are now aware that Nazis are eloquent intellectuals. As chimps and taco vendors continue to wreak havoc on my homeland, working class white Americans are going to think back more and more to those strong men in suits raising their arms to a “sieg heil” and think that those men are willing to do something about their problems.

The establishment knows this and it is scared. So it began an assault on Spencer, but curiously none of their jabs had any effect. It turns out that after you’ve called someone a neo-Nazi white supremacist a million times that doing it again and adding “but for real this time guys” doesn’t really get you anywhere. Aware of their inefficacy, they’ve turned to a new method: absurd libel. They’ve sent Spencer’s former boss Taki Theodoracopulos out to make up things about him while simultaneously spewing other lies like how white nationalism has no adherents and no influence.

The Spectator:

Richard Spencer made the front page of the New York Times two days in a row last week, and earned a half-page report on the third day. For any of you who have never heard of him — and very few have — he is described by the mendacious Times as the leader of the ‘white nationalist movement’, a movement not too many of us who believe in the white race are aware of.

Let’s start at the beginning. After I ‘sold’ the American Conservative magazine to a man called Uns for one dollar — I have kept the cheque and will cash it only if in terrible need — I invited Richard Spencer to visit me in my New York house where I offered him the job of running my website, Takimag. (He had worked at the magazine but been laid off.) Richard was well-read, a bit vague, nice-looking, well-dressed and well-spoken. Things were hunky-dory until he asked me where the bathroom was. When he returned, he looked a bit pale but told me he was fine. After we’d agreed his salary and the ideology Takimag would espouse — all shades of opinions towards the right — we shook hands and off he went.

At that point one of the maids came down and informed me that my guest had thrown up all over the carpet and simply left the mess for her to clean up. The mother of my children was outraged, and when I defended him by saying that he hadn’t thrown up on purpose, she pointed out that no member of our staff was expected to clean up such a mess. As she was already Orlando Furioso, I withheld the fact that Spencer hadn’t even bothered to tell me about it.

Wow, just wow. This disgusting old faggot is making up stories about how he pukes all over the floor.

Are we sure this guy is even white? He looks like a turkroach, or even a subcontinental.

You know what this is a near-exact mirror of? Chuck Johnson.

For those who are unaware, Chuck was the first to expose the major UVA rape story that appeared in Rolling Stone as a hoax. He made a sport out of identifying and eviscerating nearly every rape claim ever made and exposing one rotten whore after another as a complete liar. He broke apart countless media conspiracies against the right wing. As a return for his service to the truth, he was suspended from Twitter for no reason just like Spencer was, and then Gawker spread a bunch of bizarre stories about how he shat on the floor in college.

The actual story was Chuck had saved the life of a young man who had succumbed to substance abuse related poisoning and lost control of his bodily functions. Chuck made sure he survived and got him in an ambulance. There were, of course, records of this. Chuck sued Gawker much like Hulk Hogan did and is about to settle with their new owners for megabucks, so I hear.

Just like one can’t cuck the Chuck, one may not censor the Spencer.

The parallels between his story and Spencer’s are obvious, and I wouldn’t be surprised if Spencer chose to litigate against Taki for this obvious lie just as Chuck Johnson did against Gawker.

Taki then exaggerates his traffic metrics:

I nevertheless let it go, and Spencer ran Takimag for two years. Circulation stuck at 25,000. This wasn’t good enough and I decided that a change was needed. We parted amicably and he took days to teach my daughter Lolly, who replaced him, all the tricks of the trade. Which was much appreciated. That was in 2009. At the last count our readership was two-and-a-half million, and although we pay our writers, we are close to breaking even. I will let the readers make up their minds on that choice.

This is another outright fabrication of a sniveling Mediterranean mongrel in an article full of abject dishonesty. He claims two and a half million uniques here, which is a little under the readership of The Daily Stormer. The trouble is that every single third party metric shows Taki having less than half of Stormer’s visitors.

Alexa shows Daily Stormer’s US rank at 5,060, and Taki’s at 12,891. These are ranks, lower is better. Google, for example, is #1.

Similarweb, similarly, shows him far below Stormer’s reach. Similarweb underestimates Stormer’s readership but we’ll assume it’s the same for Taki.

So Stormer more than doubles Taki’s readership, consistently, in every single industry standard third party metric available. Similarweb does get pages per visitor about right – people who come to the Daily Stormer stay to read quite a few articles, unlike Taki’s pozzed site. People go there, read a couple articles and leave after figuring out that it is an even mix of defeatist cuckoldry and limpwristed faggotry from the likes of race-mixing autosodomites like Gavin McInnes.

Taki’s readership is slightly over a million, not two and a half as he claimed in The Spectator, and he’s got very low engagement with those readers. That’s all you’ve grown since 2009 with multiple salaried staffers? That’s more than twice as long as this publication has existed. Taki, you’re not only a liar, you’re a total failure. You should hang up your hat and perhaps hang up yourself along with it.

Taki goes on to claim that the hundreds of thousands of white supremacist commentators on the Internet are sockpuppets made by a single individual. This is pretty much on par with claims from Shillbots that Trump’s base of support was only a bunch of guys from 4chan and that Hillary was set to win 40 states.

They post comments that make it look as though thousands have read a certain article, but in reality most have been written by one, two or maybe three people. They just use different names for each comment. Presto! A movement is born.

What about you, Stormers? Are the readers of this website who number in the millions (not just according to us, but metrics kept by third parties such as the ones shown above) all the same guy on millions of computers?

He then closes by saying we’re going nowhere.

Mind you, there are some people who are, shall we say, Spencer followers, people like Jared Taylor, editor of American Renaissance, and Peter Brimelow, founder of VDARE.com, and also myself. There are many things Spencer says that I agree with, and a lot that I don’t. But are we about to take over the country with our ideology? Alas, not bloody likely. …. Richard Spencer’s followers are about 300 souls, which in a way makes me laugh.

We won, faggot. We’re taking over the country. Our people are being funneled into the deep state as we speak.

We are the political consensus. We are the position of the working class, most of whom define race as the central part of their identity. White nationalism has achieved a victory, and you international elites were not invited. You are done here forever, a failure, much like the cuck publication you’ve poured so much of your filthy Jew money into.

Go to hell, Taki. This victory has happened without the likes of you.

Fred Reed
Taki’s Magazine
January 27, 2013

Pondering the smoking ruins of American racial policy, I wonder whether it isn’t time to say publicly what many, if not most, of both races know: It isn’t working. It isn’t going to work. If it were, it would have. If it were working, we would not need the unending laws to force the races together when they don’t want to be together. If people wanted diversity, it would happen without compulsion.

The hope that black and white would mingle amicably if only segregation were dismantled relied on a peculiarly American inattention to life and history and on a belief that people will behave as we want them to instead of how they observably behave. Human nature remains human nature, no matter how hard one holds one’s breath and turns blue.

It is not an easy thing that we try to do. Frequently, far smaller disparities than those between black and white lead to bloody conflict. Catholics and Protestants, Shia and Sunni, Jew and Christian are often virtually indistinguishable, yet they share a history of internecine butchery of each other. Is there anywhere an example of two groups so large and utterly different as blacks and whites successfully merging?

Despite our best imaginings, race is far more than skin deep. The races differ wildly in culture, appearance, attitudes, views of each other, language, musical taste, dress, attitudes toward law, education, family, and the role of government.

Much of what blacks believe about whites is almost psychotic. There are exceptions and degrees, yes, but the centerline remains.Over and over one hears blacks asserting that we whites invented AIDS to kill off blacks, that we put substances in soft drinks to make black men impotent (“Honest, Latanya, them damn white folks put something in my Gatorade.”), and that we flood the ghetto with drugs to destroy black society. We are, blacks repeatedly insist, incorrigible racists determined to hold blacks down. Discrimination, “racial profiling,” police brutality, and “institutional racism” are, they say, the irremediable bedrock of the white soul. The Trayvon Martin case, blacks say, shows that it is open season for whites to kill young black males. Black after black says the only solution is to kill whites.

By contrast, over the last sixty years many whites have seen a desperate attempt to find something—anything—that would raise blacks to the intellectual, cultural, and economic standards of the First World. Nine white men passed Brown v. Board of Education. White federal marshals and white troops enforced the decision. An overwhelmingly white Congress enacted the Civil Rights Acts of the 1960s and still supports the endless welfare programs on which so many blacks depend. We censor ourselves savagely to avoid offending blacks. Even mild criticism of racial behavior is a firing offense. Nothing is enough. We change the color of Santa, remove the Confederate flag, admit blacks to historically white schools for which they are not remotely qualified, and pay untold millions to settle discrimination suits based on blacks’ inability to meet the standards applied to whites. It doesn’t work. The complaints never end.

We have tried desegregation, integration, mixed classrooms, Section Eight, AFDC, Head Start, affirmative action, quotas, Black History Day (or is it Month?), laws against “hate crimes” by whites, outlawing of IQ tests by employers, on and on. It hasn’t worked. Nothing suggests that it will. The chasm appears to be intractable.

What if it isn’t working because it can’t? What do we do?

Note that our racial policy is in a sense anti-black. It is aimed at making blacks into dark-skinned whites who study, talk, act, and think like us—to get them to speak white English, wear suits, and adopt the cultural norms of whites. Yet there is little evidence that blacks want to turn white. In fact they do much that is intended to maintain, or at any rate has the effect of maintaining, their separateness. Thus Keyshawn and Latoya instead of Robert and Carol. Thus Ebonics: Blacks could learn normal English if they chose, if only by imitating whites on television, but that would make them almost white. (In France and Mexico, for example, blacks speak the national language normally.) Black high-schoolers accuse their fellows who study of “acting white.” Blacks speak contemptuously of Oreos and Uncle Toms.

Whites have no more desire to be black than blacks do to be white. This attachment of each race to its culture makes assimilation impossible.

Read More