At the time of writing this has 4 upvotes and over 1K downvotes

The Jews could just as easily say, “well, we had to do away with free speech, because of safety.” Actually, they have said that.

But then they go out there and say, “well, actually, censorship is free speech.”

RT:

Susan Wojcicki, the CEO of Google’s video platform YouTube, was awarded the Freedom Forum Institute’s ‘Free Expression Award’ on Friday in a ceremony sponsored by her own company – despite YouTube’s track record of censorship.

In the digital awards ceremony, YouTube video creator Molly Burke praised Wojcicki as a free speech leader before the YouTube CEO detailed in her acceptance speech how much the platform censors its users.

“The freedoms we have, we really can’t take for granted,” Wojcicki declared, adding that “we really have to make sure we’re protecting them in every way possible.”

But she actually, literally, went on – during her free speech award ceremony – to talk about how important censorship is.

Wojcicki, however, went on to argue that “we also need to make sure there are limits,” and revealed that the company removed nine million videos in the last quarter, 90% of which were taken down by machines.

She also said there is “a lot of content that technically meets the spirit of what we’re trying to do, but it is borderline, and so for that content we will just reduce – meaning we’re not going to recommend it to our users.”

Social media users mocked the irony of Wojcicki receiving an award for free speech, and the video of the ceremony on YouTube had garnered more than 400 dislikes and just one like at the time of writing.

YouTube CEO won a Free Speech award…sponsored by YouTube. Hahahahhhaahhhahhahahahaaaaaaa pic.twitter.com/QX56hNUnFL

— Matt Orfalea (@0rf) April 19, 2021

“This is the worst form of gaslighting I’ve ever seen,” commented one user, while another questioned, “What’s next, Facebook getting an award for respecting privacy?”

One YouTube content creator posted a photo showing at least 15 of his videos banned from the platform for “inappropriate content,” and a Twitter user wrote, “Free Expression Award? Are they having a laugh[?] Didn’t she just censor the governor of Florida speaking with medical experts[?]”

This is just like the media constantly talking about how they are the First Amendment, and that Donald Trump was violating the First Amendment by calling them liars.

The media talks about how they are the First Amendment, as they demand social media companies destroy freedom of speech.

We don’t know if the social media companies would have, on their own, ever decided to do censorship. Presumably they would have, just because absolute power corrupts absolutely. However, what we have witnessed over the past five years was censorship driven entirely by the establishment media, with the media demanding that internet companies do censorship.

The appointment of Susan Wojewski as YouTube CEO was part of a censorship agenda. Up until just a few years ago, you could say the n-word or whatever on YouTube. There was no censorship at all.

It’s really disgusting the way these people have destroyed the internet.

“Trust me, goy, I know what’s best for you” just isn’t carrying the weight it once did.

We goyim have been having a little too much freedom lately.

Good thing the Jews are always there to make sure we don’t hurt ourselves by seeing things we’re not supposed to see.

Life Site News:

Susan Wojcicki, the CEO of YouTube, announced that all content contradicting the Word Health Organization (WHO) on the coronavirus pandemic will be removed from the video platform.

During a CNN interview last Sunday, Wojcicki explained there was “a 75 percent increase in the news coming from authoritative sources since the beginning of 2020. So, we have seen a lot of demand there.”

“But then we also talk about removing information that is problematic,” she continued. “Of course, anything that is medically unsubstantiated. So people saying, like, take vitamin C, you know, take turmeric, like, those are — will cure you. Those are the examples of things that would be a violation of our policy.”

She then specified that “[a]nything that would go against World Health Organization recommendations would be a violation of our policy. And so remove is another really important part of our policy.”

Telling people that taking vitamin C might help cure you of the Holocough is thoughtcrime now.

Vitamin C should, technically, help you feel better even if it doesn’t have a direct effect against this specific form of flu.

And why do you need to censor something like this?

They keep telling us of the joys of democracy.

Can people who are capable of deciding who should be president not be capable of understanding basic notions of reality?

And what exactly makes the bulbhead-run WHO more trustworthy than some rando on the internet?

His so-called people haven’t even figured out how to feed themselves, and I’m supposed to think that this particular specimen is some kind of exception that I should trust with my life?

Senator Marsha Blackburn tweeted that “[i]t is alarming that [YouTube] now relies on the [WHO]’s biased recommendations to decide what video content to take down.”

“The [WHO] gave inaccurate information about the spread of the virus, still parrots Chinese propaganda, and fought [President Donald Trump]’s China travel ban,” the junior senator from Tennessee pointed out.

“If Big Tech companies plan to police speech surrounding COVID-19, they need to rely on honest and objective experts. History repeats itself and [WHO] has proven to be untrustworthy promoters of Chinese propaganda.”

The World Health Organization has come under severe criticism for its handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. President Donald Trump even instructed his administration to halt funding “while a review is conducted to assess the World Health Organization’s role in severely mismanaging and covering up the spread of the coronavirus.”

“American taxpayers provide between $400 million and $500 million per year to the WHO. In contrast, China contributes roughly $40 million,” Trump said.

“As the organization’s leading sponsor, the United States has a duty to insist on full accountability. One of the most dangerous and costly decisions from the WHO was its disastrous decision to oppose travel restrictions from China and other nations,” he explained.

“They were very much opposed to what we did. Fortunately, I was not convinced and suspended travel from China,” Trump added. “The WHO’s attack on travel restrictions put political correctness above lifesaving measures.”

At least Trump cut the funding for this useless institution, but why isn’t he doing anything about his own supporters being censored everywhere on the internet by these Jew monopolies?

They’re all using public infrastructure one way or the other, so the government should be able to force them to allow free speech.

YouTube is not the only social media giant using its position of power to censor unwelcome content. Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced earlier this week that he considers protests against stay-at-home orders, which are often planned via Facebook, to be “harmful misinformation” that must be deleted.

While claiming that “it’s important that people can debate policies,” Zuckerberg indicated that there is a limit to how much freedom he will allow Facebook’s users to do this.

“But, you know, more than normal political discourse, I think a lot of the stuff that people are saying that is false around a health emergency like this can be classified as harmful misinformation that has a risk of leading to imminent physical danger and we’ll just take that kind of content down,” he said.

I predict JewTube is gonna have a lot of problems.

Not because of Trump, unfortunately, but because of their own censorship.

Every channel I follow there – and most are completely apolitical – has been facing problems lately.

Channels with a 7-digit number of followers can’t get 10K views in a week on new videos, ad money is going down, every comment section is full of complaints about how people aren’t getting alerts on new videos or have been unsubscribed against their will…

Censorship is evil when someone other than Jews decides what’s being censored

I have no idea why this stuff would be happening, but when they changed their algorithm or code or whatever the hell it was called in order to sabotage “conspiracy theories” and thoughtcrime, it must’ve screwed a lot of things on the site.

And because JewTube was taken over by Jews purely to be used as a propaganda outlet – none of the original founders were Jews – they can’t fix it so it’ll work for content they never intended to censor.

There’s a lot of people who make a living out of YouTube vids, and it’s getting harder and harder for them to do so, and most of them are gonna be very pissed about it.

I don’t know what exactly this means, but I do know it’ll be bad for JewTube, and that’s a good thing.

You didn’t listen…

The long-awaited nu-Tube is being unrolled right before our very eyes.

The Jews were busy building up the moral case for taking the people’s right to free speech away over the last couple of months.

You will no doubt recall that bizarre 60 Minutes report that featured Lesley Stahl telling YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki that she has to censor more speech on the platform and Susan heartily agreeing with her.

We were mystified that they discovered our secret code number, 1418. We were shocked that they discovered that Big Man Tyrone is a secret agent of the Russian government.

We were waiting with basement masturbator’s breath for the announcement of their incoming blitzkrieg.

Well, the build-up is over. We’ve arrived at the destination.

Game over, gamer.

Ars Technica:

YouTube has for a long time been used as a platform for bad actors to launch massive campaigns of targeted harassment against individuals. After years of professing an inability to act and reduce such behavior, YouTube is finally updating its policies to reflect the ways bad actors actually tend to behave, and the site is promising to increase consequences against harassers.

Content that “maliciously insults” someone based on their membership in a legally protected class, such as race, gender, or sexual orientation, is now against the rules, YouTube said in a blog post today. “Veiled or implied” threats, of the sort that tend to rile up an online mob to go harass someone, are also now prohibited.

So this basically means that all criticism of protected classes is now not allowed on YouTube. By now, we all already know who the protected classes and who the kulaks will be, so it’s not worth even getting into it.

“Something we’ve heard from our creators is that harassment sometimes takes the shape of a pattern of repeated behavior across multiple videos or comments,” YouTube added, catching up to what targets of coordinated online abuse campaigns have been saying for the better part of a decade. As such, the pattern of behavior will now be something the platform takes into account.

Accounts that repeatedly “brush up against” YouTube’s new and improved harassment policy may face financial harm for doing so, the company now says:

“We’re tightening our policies for the YouTube Partner Program (YPP) to get even tougher on those who engage in harassing behavior and to ensure we reward only trusted creators. Channels that repeatedly brush up against our harassment policy will be suspended from YPP, eliminating their ability to make money on YouTube. We may also remove content from channels if they repeatedly harass someone.”

A solid chunk of YouTube is cafeteria style shit-flinging between different e-personalities who disagree on topics relevant to their sphere of interest. All of this is presumably coming to an end. The era of open forum debates, or the infinitely more entertaining “Bloodsports” phenomenon, is over.

But do not weep that is over.

Remember the good times and rejoice that it happened.

And never forget the Jewish/Latinx journalist faggot who kvetched so hard that he gave the Jews the casus belli for making all of these changes.

The change was spurred in part by pushback to YouTube’s handling of a harassment campaign against journalist Carlos Maza earlier this year. Maza, who is Latino and openly gay, became a target of conservative personality Steven Crowder, who repeatedly hurled homophobic and racist invectives against Maza in the videos shared with his millions of subscribers.

YouTube’s anti-extremism crackdown targets journalist who documents extremism
YouTube investigated the reports against Crowder. On June 4, the company told Maza in a series of tweets that while Crowder’s behavior was “hurtful,” it did not violate YouTube’s policies. One day later, after widespread negative reactions to that statement, YouTube amended its stance and demonetized Crowder, prohibiting him from selling ads on his YouTube videos.

All Steven Crowder did was bantz this walking caricature of a Vox journalist. When Meza rounded up a mob of Jews and wahmen to march on Crowder’s channel and demand that he apologize and disavow, Crowder instead doubled down on his Abuse Speech.

I always knew Steven Crowder would kick off the race war with his hate-filled diatribes and I feel that I have finally been vindicated in my claims.

At the same time, YouTube updated its hate speech policy to ban neo-Nazi material and similar white supremacist content. That policy update also prohibited “truther”-style denialist content, such as videos claiming the Holocaust or the 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School never happened.

Um, OK? That’s a weird one to throw in there.

Usually when you’re not allowed to deny that something happened, it almost certainly means that it never happened.

Sorry, but them’s the rules. And that means that we all owe the Fat Man an apology.

He knew and he tried to warn us. 

Now we wait to see who else will join Alex Jones in permanent YouTube exile.

My predictions:

• Steven Crowder
• Sargon and the remainder of the skeptic community
• PewDiePie
• Every single e-personality that has appeared on Ethan Ralph’s Killstream
• Literally everyone with something interesting to say

YouTube is basically just going to be unboxing videos + makeup tutorials going forward.

They make most of their money on music anyway, and have for a long time. 95% of the most-watched videos in 2018 were music videos.

Although it was named “YouTube,” because it was supposed to be “you on the tube,” it has become a standard corporate media outlet.

“You,” meaning anyone who is not a corporate product, are a minuscule fraction of the content. Political content of any kind is less than 1% of the views. They can just ban it all, and they will probably see a rise in stock prices because it will be looked at as “safer” when the media isn’t constantly saying that people with webcams are causing mass murders.

Of course, this won’t all happen at once. They are going to continue this slow deathgrip. The big reason for that is to ensure that the goyim do not organize some form of alternate platform. We could pool our resources and fund an alternative, but instead everyone is playing hot potato and hoping they’ll survive the next purge while the ship slowly sinks.

This kikess just went and ruined one of the best things that the Internet ever produced.

I bet she was cackling maniacally while she did it.

This horrible Jewish woman Susan Wojcicki thinks she is qualified to police the thoughts of people on the Internet. She reaffirmed this stance during an interview on the Jewish 60 Minutes show.

The Jewish 60 Minutes show, which airs on the subversive Jewish media network CBS, broadcast an interview with the Jewish CEO of YouTube Susan Wojcicki last night.

Just to give you an idea of how Jewish this whole thing was, Wojcicki was interviewed by the Jewish reporter Lesley Stahl. There was no attempt to even hide how Jewish this piece was. It was just Jews talking about how important it is to shut down free speech.

To promote their segment, 60 Minutes put out a ridiculous tweet falsely claiming that YouTube is an open platform committed to free speech. The accompanying clip contained some footage of Nick Fuentes and other people who the Jews consider to be hateful people. They also implied that YouTube should be banning more content.

YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki tries to police the site while maintaining an open platform. But the company’s commitment to free speech can lead to a narrow definition of what videos are considered harmful. https://t.co/xdCP0J2y46 pic.twitter.com/zzvhESxZ2i

— 60 Minutes (@60Minutes) December 2, 2019

At time of writing, the 60 Minutes tweet was getting ratioed quite severely.

Everyone knows that YouTube is not an open platform that is committed to free speech. To even claim this after everything we’ve seen from this diabolical Jewish website is the most insane thing imaginable. It is just an outright lie to say this.

YouTube has banned Alex Jones and countless other people for their political views. They have justified these bans by constantly redefining their terms of service while claiming political speech they dislike is “hate speech.”

TruNews, a Christian-based media operation, just had their YouTube channel banned a few days ago after the Jewish Anti-Defamation League put them on a list of channels that they wanted shut down.

YouTube has banned us, again, all because of our Friday godcast. Watch what got us suspended for one week. It is still on our website. https://t.co/uNiSCPLTs9

— TruNews (@TruNews) November 26, 2019

There’s literally countless examples of YouTube censoring people for their political views while misconstruing their political views as “hate.”

60 Minutes also put out another stupid tweet showing a clip of Stahl and Wojcicki discussing how they determine what videos get banned. They comically talk about a World War II video showing Adolf Hitler. Wojcicki says that they banned the video because it was watermarked with the term “bloodtears1418.” Wojcicki goes on to talk about how 1418 is a number that White supremacists use, which Stahl confirms.

How does YouTube determine what videos are too hateful or violent for the site? The company’s CEO showed 60 Minutes some examples. https://t.co/s6KtiDF9qF pic.twitter.com/uJVYfNXptU

— 60 Minutes (@60Minutes) December 2, 2019

1418? Really?

Even the ADL doesn’t consider that a hateful number. They must be thinking of 1488.

But the fact that neither Wojcicki nor Stahl identified this mistake just undermines the premise that YouTube has any business in policing content.

On top of that, 60 Minutes posted an additional “overtime” segment on their YouTube channel implying that YouTube is allowed to censor certain types of speech while still maintaining their status as an open platform.

They obviously can’t maintain their status as a platform if they are selectively choosing what sort of lawful content is allowed or not allowed. That makes them a publisher and not a platform. But this was a piece put together by a bunch of Jews, so being truthful with their audience is hardly a priority.

The good news is that people aren’t being fooled by this Jewish 60 Minutes propaganda piece.

Even Dan Bongino, despite blaming the 60 Minutes piece on a liberal conspiracy, expressed extreme displeasure at what he saw.

Make absolutely NO MISTAKE, the @60Minutes piece on YouTube tonight is nothing more than a push by liberal activists to silence conservatives through corporate pressure. Liberals, and their media pals, DESPISE free speech.

— Dan Bongino (@dbongino) December 2, 2019

And here’s some other solid commentary on the 60 Minutes piece.

Had to read that twice.

“But the company’s commitment to free speech can lead to a narrow definition of what videos are considered harmful.”

“A narrow definition of what is harmful.”

The translation is “they are not censoring nearly enough. Too much free speech going on.” https://t.co/GU4QPrRgDI

— Selim Bradley (@SelimSeesYou) December 2, 2019

All these powerful media groups are trying to get me deplatformed simply because I’m independent and telling the truth.

— Nicholas J. Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) December 2, 2019

Yes, you read that right. Naked Ape. Nick Fuentes. 60 Minutes.

Also, notice how CBS snips out one fiery piece of Fuentes' show out of context in an effort to get him deplatformed. pic.twitter.com/Ie9FmDjesp

— Ethan Ralph (@TheRalphRetort) December 2, 2019

The entire 60 minutes YouTube segment was about preparing the public for the massive Dec 10th purge of “politically incorrect“ creators on Dec 10th and beyond.

— GabTrends.com (@getongab) December 2, 2019

This 60 Minutes YouTube special is too boomer to exist. It’s a geriatric reporter wondering how “offensive” videos get posted on the internet

— Scott Greer (@ScottMGreer) December 2, 2019

60 Minutes YouTube segment’s main point was demanding the platform censor “white nationalism” and Trump ads.

Pure Boomer trash

— Scott Greer (@ScottMGreer) December 2, 2019

This 60 Minutes piece on YouTube was just so unbelievably Jewish in nature. It was just a bunch of Jews getting together to lecture the goyim on why Jewish YouTube has the duty to censor free speech while simultaneously claiming that Jewish YouTube is a free speech site. It was 1984 doublethink on full display.

It is simply incomprehensible how people can’t see that Jews are at the center of this agenda to stifle free speech on the Internet. It’s right in your face with this 60 Minutes piece. You’d have to be blind not to see what’s going on.

Following the latest round of egregious infringements of freedom, wherein multiple right-wingers were banned, the filthy kike CEO of YouTube is out there in public saying that she isn’t going to censor anyone.

The Jew is a master of the art of reverse psychology.

On Sunday, James Allsup, who had nearly half a million followers, was banned for no reason and without warning. This was a new behavior for YouTube – normally they use a system of “strikes” before they ban you – and it was incredible to do it to someone with such a large channel.

Of course, the media is going right along with the Jew fantasy, not calling out this rabid yid for the doublespeak of “the Jew cries out for open platforms as he censors you.”

CNBC:

YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki says the platform will remain “open,” even if that means a continued influx of content deemed controversial or offensive.

In a letter addressed to YouTube creators, Wojcicki says the Google-owned platform is committed to remaining open to all creators because she thinks it does more good than harm.

Wojcicki’s letter comes as the company and its chief face scrutiny over the spread of hateful content and misinformation on the platform. In recent months, it has updated policies to try and stem that but has faces questions about whether openness got it into the situation its in.

Thanks for that bit of editorializing, CNBC. Without your help, I wouldn’t have known about these questions YouTube is facing from this faceless entity you have informed me is posing these questions.

“A commitment to openness is not easy,” Wojcicki wrote. “It sometimes means leaving up content that is outside the mainstream, controversial or even offensive.”

…

“As more issues come into view, a rising chorus of policymakers, press and pundits are questioning whether an open platform is valuable…or even viable,” Wojcicki said. “Despite these concerns, I believe preserving an open platform is more important than ever.”

This is actually the exact opposite of reality.

There are people complaining about “hateful content and misinformation” – but those people are a tiny group compared to all of those complaining about the ongoing censorship. A whole helluva lot of people are angry about the censorship. It is really just Jared Holt of Right Wing Watch and Jonathan Greenblatt of the Anti-Defamation League that are demanding more censorship, since the SPLC went under.

Even most leftists are not out there demanding censorship. Most people still believe in freedom of speech, or at least just don’t care enough to go around demanding that people be silenced by Jews.

Meanwhile, the President of the United States and the hosts of the nation’s number one and number two most watched news programs are calling for the censorship to end. You have literally hundreds of millions of people across the entire planet angry about this censorship, compared to two random Jews no one has ever heard of calling for censorship.

Furthermore, Wojcicki IS CENSORING PEOPLE.

To come out and say “sorry, we can’t censor people because it’s an open platform” hours after having brought down the rusty knife of Jewish censorship is max Orwellianism.

Of course, this is all part of the plan. By saying “oh sorry, I can’t censor anyone,” she is begging for these organizations to come out and more forcefully demand that she censor people. This is just a weird show.

YouTube was created as a way for YOU to be on the TUBE. It was part of the INTERNET, which was a platform designed for people to freely share their ideas. YouTube is now mainly a way for black people and women to watch music videos, so they are trying to shut YOU down.

Furthermore, Wojcicki is old, and yet refuses to wear a bra.

Yuck.

Google is retiring their popular Hangouts app, which featured the ability to easily livestream conversations on YouTube. Many have said that they did this to prevent people from exposing the evil nature of the Jewish race. It turns out that there is a great deal of truth in that statement.

Even though this has been known for a little while now, it is worth mentioning that Google is officially retiring their popular Hangouts app. This announcement has created a great deal of confusion among podcasters, livestreamers and anybody who generally follows the technology industry. The app allowed people to quickly and conveniently set up video and audio conferences that could be livestreamed to audiences on YouTube.

Here’s more specifics on the situation.

9 to 5 Google:

After classic Hangouts is retired for G Suite customers later this year, consumer accounts will also be transitioned to Hangouts Chat and Meet. One casualty of this shutdown is Hangouts On Air, which is “going away later this year.”

Originally a Google+ feature, Hangouts On Air was later integrated into YouTube. It allows users to easily host a multi-user video chat through Hangouts and livestream the entire conversation to YouTube.

After starting a new Hangout On Air call, users this week are being presented with a banner about the shutdown later this year. They are advised to try YouTube.com/webcam for “quick streaming.”

The problem is that the replacement apps being rolled out by Google do not offer the same ability to easily livestream conversations on YouTube.

For most Hangouts on Air users looking for “quick streaming,” YouTube’s first-party solution is inadequate for only supporting one camera. It is not ideal for multiple callers located in different places. The immediate YouTube alternative is setting up Live Control Room and streaming via an encoder.

Another solution is Hangouts Meet and its ability to set a video call “Public” for 100,000 in-domain watchers. At the moment, that is only available for G Suite Enterprise and G Suite Enterprise for Education.

We’ve reached out to Google to clarify whether the 2019 shutdown of Hangouts on Air applies to both G Suite and consumer accounts. The latter group will be the hardest hit by this “going away” as there is no simple, first-party alternative that replicates the old functionality exactly.

One solution would be for Google to add multi-user streaming to YouTube, or add YouTube integration to Hangouts Meet. Without doing one or the other, this deprecation seems premature and will require YouTubers (and podcasters) to switch to a third-party app.

So why would Google retire this popular app and replace it with other apps that don’t offer one of its most popular features?

Azzmador is a popular YouTube livestreamer and radio personality.

To learn more, I reached out to Azzmador, a popular YouTube livestreamer and radio personality to get his take on the situation. Azzmador has been a longtime user of the Hangouts app and regularly used it to livestream his shows on YouTube.

“It is inexplicable that YouTube would end Hangouts, thus ending livestream shows as we know them. At least on a business level, until you consider that YouTube/Alphabet/Google is run by scheming kikes who only care about maintaining their tenuous, ever loosening grip on the globalist, anti-White narrative, which requires total control over the information and opinions going out over their services,” Azzmador stated.

As a reporter who strives to just report factual information, I was admittedly skeptical of Azzmador’s claim that Google and YouTube were run by scheming kikes. So being the investigative reporter that I am, I decided to do some research.

Much to my shock, I quickly discovered that Google and YouTube were indeed controlled by scheming kikes.

YouTube’s CEO is the scheming kike Susan Wojcicki.

Alphabet (Google’s parent company) is run by the scheming kike Larry Page.

Azzmador also accused the scheming kikes of censoring his YouTube content.

“I would watch in real time as view counts on videos would GO DOWN, and subscribers would constantly complain that they had been unsubscribed without their consent. YouTube was keeping our content in a cage,” he said.

Not to be outdone by these scheming kikes, Azzmador pledged to continue his show on Dlive, an alternative livestreaming platform that is popular with gamers and used by top YouTube personality PewDiePie.

“In my opinion, YouTube has done the world a favor this time, as their having completely shoahed this super popular feature from this platform has finally given rise to a viable YouTube alternative, at least in the realm of livestreaming, namely Dlive,” he said.

He gave the service good reviews following his first livestream on the platform.

“I have just moved our TKR Live livestreams to Dlive at dlive.tv/azzmador, and could not be more happy with the service. We had our first stream this Wednesday night, and instantly were trending on the front page as one of the most popular streams playing. It’s amazing how popular our message is, so long as Jews aren’t controlling people’s access to it and shutting everything down,” he said.

Based on this information, it couldn’t be any more obvious why the Jews who run Google and YouTube made the decision to shut down Hangouts and its YouTube livestreaming feature. They are attempting to prevent people like Azzmador and others from livestreaming multi-user conversations that expose the evil nature of the Jewish race.

Clearly, Jews do not want non-Jews understanding how evil they are, which is why the decision was made to retire this popular app. The retirement of Hangouts is just the latest casualty in the Jewish war against free speech on the Internet. It’s why Google, YouTube and all these other big Jewish tech companies need to be immediately regulated and required to provide equal access to all people regardless of their political views.

The mainstream media is now openly asking if the Jewish enterprise of Facebook is finished. That’s because the company has been dealing with multiple scandals in what has become a continuous public relations disaster for the social media giant.

Facebook, YouTube and Twitter have collectively become an incredibly corrosive force on our culture. It is no coincidence that Jews are at the center of all these social media behemoths. That’s because Jews are involved with every corrosive force plaguing Western civilization. This is a simple objective fact for anybody willing to be honest with themselves.

Facebook’s top two people are Jews. The CEO is the Jew Mark Zuckerberg and the COO is the Jewess Sheryl Sandberg. YouTube’s CEO is the Jewess Susan Wojcicki. Twitter might not be run by a Jew, but its CEO Jack Dorsey has allowed the Jews at the Anti-Defamation League to dictate who is and who isn’t allowed on the site. So effectively, the three largest social media sites on the Internet are Jewish enterprises.

These sites are ruining the Internet. Instead of empowering the free flow of information, they have served to stifle it through political censorship. Instead of protecting user privacy they have deliberately trafficked user data for profit. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg.

Specifically, Facebook is starting to run into serious trouble. Mainstream media outlets like the Independent, are running articles asking if the company is finished. This comes following revelations that Facebook was selling the private messages of their users to third parties. There is a very real prospect that they will face massive lawsuits over this.

But that’s just been the most recent scandal of many scandals surrounding Facebook. WIRED documented 21 separate Facebook scandals in 2018 alone. They’ve been mired in so many scandals that it’s been almost impossible to keep track of them. Suffice to say, they have managed to piss off people from all sides of the political spectrum due to the sheer scale of their unethical behavior.

Of course none of this is a surprise if you understand the general behavior of Jews. A company whose top leadership consists of Jews is one that you should expect not to have a moral compass. They took a product which could have theoretically been a good thing for the world and chose to exploit their users for maximum shekels. They cared nothing about the consequences.

They’ve effectively killed the goose that laid the golden egg.  This is reflected in the value of their stock which has lost around a third of its value over the past year.

The future definitely does not look good for Facebook. This is further evidenced by the fact that young people are choosing not to use it. They view Facebook as something that old people use. And it’s probably fair to say that Facebook stopped being cool back in the 00s. Or if we are to be generous, it may have reached peak cool when the Facebook based film “The Social Network” came out in 2010. That film not surprisingly was written by the Jew Aaron Sorkin and starred the Jews Jesse Eisenberg and Andrew Garfield.

The big question is, how many more scandals are we going to see before Facebook and these other social media behemoths face the full wrath of government regulation? Major action is justified and long overdue – and now both sides of the political spectrum are calling for it.

President Trump needs to get on this immediately before all of his supporters get banned from these sites. It is patently ridiculous that the entire digital public square is under the control of highly unethical Jews. Especially when one analyzes how they are managing these operations.

If there’s any good news, it is that the world of technology is rapidly evolving. MySpace was the industry standard back in the early 00s and now nobody uses it.

Could Facebook suffer the same fate? It is not outside the realm of possibilities.

Google’s Chief Executive Officer Sundar Pichai testified in front of the House Judiciary Committee Tuesday. Throughout his testimony, he falsely claimed that Google is not a politically biased company.

NDTV:

Google chief executive Sundar Pichai parried US lawmakers Tuesday over complaints of political bias and intrusive data collection as the internet giant came under heavy criticism from conservatives.

“We build our products in a neutral way,” Pichai said in one exchange with a lawmaker, and added later: “We approach our work without any political bias.”

Pichai was called to the House Judiciary Committee following a series of attacks by President Donald Trump and his supporters claiming that Google and other internet platforms were suppressing conservative voices, despite persistent denials from the companies.

It is not surprising that he would take this position. Because Pichai is just a colored front man for the Jews who founded the company. Google’s parent company is Alphabet, whose CEO is the Jew Larry Page.

The Jewish co-founders of Google Sergey Brin and Larry Page.

It appears as if Pichai was installed as the company’s CEO to kike the goyim by making it less obvious that Google is a Jewish operation. He’s originally from India and has no cultural connection to the people who built Western civilization. This makes him perfect for this role.

He also has no cultural problem with lying to the government, which was treating him like a child during this hearing, due to his Apu-type accent. Virtually everything he said at the hearing was a lie.

He confusingly dismissed questions about a leaked email showing that the company staff was devastated following Trump’s win, and planned to “reverse things” by altering the search.

Along with conservative questions about bias and lax policies on data protection and privacy, Pichai faced Democrat demands that they censor more people, with the Jewish Congressrat Jamie Raskin demanding he shut down YouTube videos about Jewish Satanic rituals (3:44:20 in the video at the top).

While agreeing with the Democrats that more needed to be done to silence freedom of speech, Pichai just stuttered and pretended to be confused by all questions relating to political bias. His underlying message was that there was no political bias at all, and everything that they did to make it look as though there is is simply coincidence (it was apparently also a coincidence that all Republicans at this hearing were claiming that there is bias, while all Democrats were claiming there is not).

Google is politically biased and politically biased in some of the most extreme ways imaginable.

Shortly after last year’s Unite the Right rally in August of 2017, they effectively seized this publication’s domain name. All because they disliked a joke Andrew Anglin made about the fat 330lb childless slut Heather Heyer. Google’s decision was widely discussed on technology sites and heavily criticized by groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

EFF, August 17, 2017:

Earlier this week, following complaints about a vitriolic and abusive Daily Stormer article on Heather Heyer—the woman killed when a white nationalist drove a car into a crowd of anti-racism demonstrators—GoDaddy told the site’s owners that they had 24 hours to leave their service. Daily Stormer subsequently moved their domain to Google’s domain management service. Within hours Google announced that it too was refusing Daily Stormer as a customer. Google also placed the dailystormer.com domain on “Client Hold”, which means that Daily Stormer’s owner cannot activate, use or move the domain to another service. It’s unclear whether this is for a limited amount of time, or whether Google has decided to effectively take ownership of the dailystormer.com domain permanently. Cloudflare, whose service was used to protect the site from denial-of-service attacks, subsequently dropped them as a customer.

We at EFF defend the right of anyone to choose what speech they provide online; platforms have a First Amendment right to decide what speech does and does not appear on their platforms. That’s what laws like CDA 230 in the United States enable and protect.

But we strongly believe that what GoDaddy, Google, and Cloudflare did here was dangerous. That’s because, even when the facts are the most vile, we must remain vigilant when platforms exercise these rights.

This was a new form of digital censorship that Google proudly championed. But this is just one of many examples showing their political bias.

After Donald Trump was elected the President of the United States in 2016, a leaked video showed many of Google’s top executives expressing how upset they were about the outcome of the election.

Tucker Carlson received internal Google emails showing employees discussing how they could manipulate search algorithms following Trump’s travel ban order.

Google also fired James Damore, one of their engineers, because he wrote a memo daring to describe some of the fundamental differences between men and women.

We also have a significant number of people with right-leaning views who have been banned off of YouTube, an entity which is also owned by Google’s parent company Alphabet.

YouTube’s CEO is the Jewess Susan Wojcicki. Under her leadership, they’ve banned all sorts of popular content creators including Alex Jones and most recently Gavin McInnes. The reasons justifying these bans have all been extremely dubious in nature. It’s safe to say that they were banned because of their political beliefs.

And speaking of Jones, he was at the hearing along with Roger Stone. He confronted Pichai in the hallway before his testimony and repeatedly stated that “Google is evil.” He also accused Pichai of helping the Communist Chinese commit genocide.

Alex Jones gave Google CEO Sundar Pichai a piece of his mind! https://t.co/9ci83AxYmt

— Millie Weaver (@Millie__Weaver) December 11, 2018

But Jones is 100 percent right. Google is a very evil Jewish company. The only way to deal with Google is for the Trump administration to aggressively regulate it. Google can’t claim to be a neutral platform when they are actively conspiring to censor specific political views. Serious government action against Google and the other big social media companies like Facebook and Twitter is long overdue.

It is also high-time for the arrogant and disgraceful H1-B CEO to be deported back to his native shithole.

Andrew Anglin contributed to this report.

YouTube is adopting all sorts of horrible policies because it is run by Jews.

The Jew run video sharing site YouTube has gone on record to admit that they are actively censoring independent analysis of news and current events. They’ve admitted to changing the site’s search algorithm to censor points of view that are not approved by YouTube management. In other words, they are going out of their way to censor viewpoints not approved by Jews.

WSJ:

YouTube this week surfaced videos peddling misinformation, hateful messages and conspiracy theories to users tracking major news events—prompting the site to change its search results to promote more authoritative sources.

For example, the fifth result when searching “Las Vegas shooting” on YouTube late Tuesday yielded a video titled “Proof Las Vegas Shooting Was a FALSE FLAG attack—Shooter on 4th Floor.” The video said there were multiple shooters in Sunday’s mass shooting, a claim dismissed by law enforcement. Posted by a channel called the End Times News Report, it amassed more than 1.1 million views in about 27 hours.

The fourth result when searching “NFL anthem protest” on Wednesday was a video that claimed Anheuser-Busch InBev NV was considering pulling its sponsorship of the National Football League over national anthem protests—and urged viewers to push the company to do so. The claim had been widely debunked days before.

In response to criticism on social media of some search results this week, a person familiar with YouTube said the company is accelerating the rollout of planned changes to its search engine. On Wednesday night, the video service began promoting more authoritative sources in search results, especially pertaining to major news events, the person said. YouTube doesn’t disclose how it determines which sources are authoritative.

A social media site loses credibility when it abandons its neutrality. YouTube has done this in spades over the past couple of years. This latest move is particularly troubling.

They say that they are promoting more authoritative sources but are refusing to disclose how they determine which sources are considered to be authoritative. It’s an entirely insane policy. Whose to say what is authoritative and what isn’t? This should be a matter for the users on YouTube to decide. After all, users can up vote or down vote videos and leave comments. There’s no reason for YouTube management to be deciding what views are valid and what views aren’t.

What they are effectively doing is censoring views that they dislike. No matter how crazy, false or insane a viewpoint might be perceived, it is ridiculous to adjust the site’s entire search algorithm to make it less likely that someone would find a specific type of content. Each video covering news, current events or any other topic should be treated no different than any other by the search engine. It shouldn’t matter if the video is uploaded by ABC News or some guy in his basement that wears tinfoil on his head. All content should be treated equally with its validity debated in the court of public opinion. The term “content neutrality” is something any viable social media site should be forced to adopt.

Basically what YouTube is doing is favoring content from the big Jewish run media outlets promoting “official narratives” over independent content creators. There’s no other way to interpret this move. It’s the latest in a long line of retarded policies implemented by this horrible Jew run website.

And here’s the horrible horse faced Jewish woman Susan Wojcicki who runs YouTube. Do you honestly think she gives a damn about the free exchange of ideas? It’s obvious that this concept is alien to her entire being.

“Why the long face?” – “It’s because I’m a horsefaced kike.”

As we previously reported, kike CEO of JewTube Susan Wojcicki made her own YouTube channel featuring a bunch of politically correct faggot ‘content’ creators trying to help her make a better channel.

The majority of the community didn’t approve of this video.

As is standard YouTube procedure, they proceeded to shut it down in a way that at a glance does not look like it has been shut down.

Kikess Wojcicki also gave a piss poor canned response dodging any of the questions asked.