Most people are stupid, and this is especially true for people on the internet. Sometimes, you have to talk to them like they are babies.

I recently wrote an article about Tucker Carlson and other right-wingers claiming that America is a “fascist country,” while denying the reality that by every definition, it is in fact a democracy. My assertion is that democracy is not good, and is in fact bad. Whatever you think of historical fascism, it was a much better, fairer system that led to greater prosperity and personal freedom.

Unfortunately, people will still post this alleged quote from Benito Mussolini, and act as though it explains everything:

Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.

There is no evidence that this is a real quote, but rather one of the many fake quotes that got passed around on the internet in the early 2000s.

The quote is usually attributed to a 1935 article written by Mussolini in the 1932 “Enciclopedia Italiana,” but the quote does not appear in that article. A longer article addressing the same issues from the same year, “Fascism: Doctrine and Institutions,” also does not contain the quote. Maybe he said it at some point, no one can say because he said a lot of things, but there isn’t any source documentation of it.

If he did say it, he certainly didn’t mean what people imply he meant, which is that “fascism” was intended to be similar to the modern American state, where private corporations lobby work directly with the government to write laws that benefit a small minority of wealthy persons. When Mussolini talked about “corporatism,” he was actually talking about the standard definition of the term, which refers to collective bargaining by various worker syndicates. (Wikipedia explains it well enough). Corporatism is similar to the medieval system of guilds, where artisans and merchants had membership organizations that regulated their trade and through collective bargaining power made tax and other regulatory deals with local lords and sometimes the monarchy itself. The corporatist system also encompassed trade unions, the military, and the Catholic Church, giving each self-regulating group a seat at the table to negotiate directly with the state.

This system of various working bodies in society organizing collectively and negotiating directly with the state is very different than what we have now in America, though we do have remnants of it in the form of unions. I’ve always been anti-union, because these groups are completely corrupt and decadent, but it is possible that if things were ordered differently, unions would not function as cartels inhibiting leeching off of the public trust. It seemed to work fine in Mussolini’s Italy, but we should remember that this government only existed for a short time before it was snuffed out by the Americans.

The people who cite this fake quote, however, are observably very low-level morons, and appear to be claiming that any form or public-private partnership is “fascism” and is therefore bad and evil. If “fascism” is purely defined by “public-private partnerships,” then every government which ever existed, save extreme communist governments, were fascist states. You have to have some kind of system of private persons and private groups cooperating with the government, or the entire society is going to be controlled by the government.

The problem in America is that the masses of people are cut out of the equation, given no power at all, while the private interests that work with the government are made up entirely of elites who manage the various private institutions of society. Not only are the competing interests not balanced, the interests of the largest groups, which are the peasantry and the middle classes, are never addressed, and no normal person has any ability to make his voice heard. This is what I addressed in the previous article, pointing to the fact that in a democracy, the bureaucracy is totally opaque, and elected politicians simply serve as temporary frontmen for that bureaucracy, which means that no one in the system can ever be held responsible for anything. The buck stops nowhere, so there is never anyone to blame. Presidents always avoid blame, passing it onto the Congress or the court system, while even particularly diabolical individuals such as Anthony Fauci, a man who certainly appeared to be making a lot of decisions personally, are able to toss the hot potato into the black hole of bureaucracy, claiming that they were just following orders of some other group.

“America is a Republic”

A separate but related response to condemning the American system of democracy is “America is not a democracy, it is a Republic.” This is a special kind of retarded statement, which would only be possible for an American to make.

Here’s the thing: basically every country that is not a monarchy is a republic. It simply means the country is guided by a constitution rather than a blood lineage. Cuba and North Korea are republics. Egypt and Turkey are republics. The USSR was divided into many republics, several of which became “independent republics” after the USSR fell, while post-Russia remains a “federation of republics.”

Meanwhile, the United Kingdom remains a kingdom, that is a monarchy, and yet has just as much democracy as the various republics.

Therefore, “the US is a republic” is a factual statement, but a totally meaningless statement.

Obviously, this is not to say that when the Founders declared “America is a republic” that they intended for things to turn out like they have. The problem, however, is not that America stopped being a republic, but rather that it began to integrate much too much democracy into the republican framework, which allowed for institutions of power, including both private interests and the government itself, to evade all accountability and operate as a black box.

Originally, the US was a “democratic republic,” but it was only land-owning white men that were allowed to vote. The major change in our system of government that created this mess was enfranchising peasants, then black people, then women. None of these groups are capable of making informed decisions or holding the government accountable, and the “one person, one vote” system means that the media is capable of deciding the outcomes of elections using lies and emotionalized nonsense.

To put the absurdity of claiming that every single individual in society deserves equal say into perspective, Ireland recently did a push to get people with Down Syndrome to vote. There is Google data showing that around this last election, “can dogs vote?” became a popular search query. Allowing dogs to vote would make more sense than giving the vote to a human who wonders if their dog can vote.

In recent years, we’ve obviously dealt with rampant voter fraud in America, but it should be noted that the universal suffrage system is the only thing that allowed for this voter fraud to happen in the first place. If we had a body of land-owning men as the only ones allowed to vote, they would never allow for what amounted to anonymous voting in the first place, and instead would have voted for a secure voting system. Through this mass democracy system, people have voted to ban voter ID, as a result of emotional propaganda claiming that black people are so pitiful they can’t get IDs, and thus it would be a cruel action against an oppressed class to require ID to vote. A system that makes these kinds of decisions is clearly not at all reasonable.

Mussolini’s vision of organized syndicates making deals with the government might be open to the same kind of corruption we have seen in labor unions over the last century or so, but no system is completely immune to corruption. Surely, a system of syndicates would operate more in the rational interests of the public than this universal democracy system.

What is the Power Doing?

People need to start thinking about what power is instead of how it operates. All of this talk about systems is ultimately academic. The idea that American democracy serves the interests of the public is cartoonish and vile, and clearly untrue, but there are systems that allow universal voting that are not this corrupt. Russia allows universal voting, and while there is a fair amount of corruption in Russia, it is nowhere near on the level of the US, and despite corruption, the policies of the government generally line up with the popular will.

People in power are always first and foremost concerned about remaining in power. This is natural enough. If you had a lot of power, would you want to give it up? I would not.

If you look at this as the prerogative of the powerful, then you see something that is the same across every government that has ever existed: the powerful defend their position of power. Democracy sort of obfuscates that by moving around these various figureheads, but at this point I think everyone understands that there is a well-established political entity in Washington, DC that is composed of a series of powerful individuals and families who are intent on maintaining their power.

There is no way to prevent powerful people from doing everything in their power to remain in power. And if you shared the goals of the people in power, you would not want to remove them from power. Therefore, dislodging the powerful is good or bad based only on the goals of that power.

In historical monarchies in Europe, there were not a lot of people wanting to dislodge the king from power, as the goal of the king was necessarily to perpetuate Christendom, and to care for the people. The people could disagree with the king, or want him to do things he wasn’t doing, but this usually did not mean they wanted to overthrow him. If kings were replaced, it was with one of their relatives, meaning the family maintained its power. But of course, under a Christian mandate, the king did not have the ability to do anything weird, and therefore the public didn’t have much reason to oppose him.

The problem in the United States and her vassals is that the government in Washington is fundamentally Jewish, and thus fundamentally opposed to the interests of Christian people. Democracy provides the shield for them to engage in the ultimate forms of subversion, corruption, and tyranny, to obfuscate their power, and to operate with impunity. If it were not for the Jews, this current universal suffrage system would still be totally corrupt, but it would not be so ridiculously weird and evil. Jews have brought in women, homosexuals, and various aggrieved minorities to serve as soldiers in their campaign against heterosexual white Christian men. The fact that they are on a campaign against us is the problem. Why would they be on such a campaign, other than because they are evil by their very nature? They had extreme power in America by the 1960s, and they could have held onto it indefinitely, but they decided to use that power to go to war with the core population of the country.

Democracy is relevant only insofar as it is the ultimate manifestation of Jewish tyranny. If it was not for these Jews who have lodged themselves into positions of power, democracy would have been reformed long ago, and made to work better than it does, but Jews want to perpetuate their own power, and they want to push their agenda, and so they push for more democracy, and push to overthrow governments all over the world and install their system of democracy in order to extent their global control network.

Most of the problems that the 20th century movements of fascism, communism, and capitalism were seeking to address have already been solved by technological advancements, and don’t really need to be addressed with such vigor. China has figured out a system that allows a billion and a half people to live relatively good lives, with the opportunity for social mobility, and they’ve done it without employing any type of ideological dogma, simply focusing on the practicalities of the relationships between the state, the wealthy, and the working classes.

In the West, Jews are the problem. Jews are the reason why we are in an age which should be something resembling a technological utopia, and yet most people are struggling just to get by. While discussion of the nature of the system can be interesting, it is ultimate futile if the goal is anything other than dislodging Jews from power.

I know it was shitty last week.

I was working on some other stuff.

I don’t make money on this website and I’m middle-aged, so I sort of need to sort some things out.

There’s no article today, obviously.

My bad.

I’ll try to do better this week.

Very few people are going to be able to grasp this thing that happened on Tuesday. It’s unfortunate, but the reality is that this is something that is not going to fit into many people’s brains. Most people are just happy Trump won, and don’t want to think too much about why the election fraud machine was turned off.

In short, the people with the ability to commit massive election fraud declined to push the button and commit that fraud because the people with that ability wanted the same candidate as the masses of voters.

I will do my best to explain the long story here.

To start, I must confirm: I am the number one “election denier,” denying the 2020 election while it was happening, when they were bringing in new votes at 3AM.

After 2020, I had argued that it would be impossible for Trump to win in 2024. The argument went: the election was stolen in 2020, then again in 2022, and no serious measures were taken to prevent further fraud in key states.

However, I predicted Trump as the likely “winner” after October 7th and then said I was as certain as anyone could be after the first “assassination attempt.”

On March 8, I did a total reevaluation of the election situation, and wrote:

You could, and probably will, see the media falling back in their attacks on Trump. They will still attack him, but they will tone it down. In particular, they will start admitting he is likely to win, and publishing polls showing that. And then, on election night, they may well behave very differently than they did in 2020, calling states early for Trump.

And on July 22, I wrote:

I do think “people losing faith in democracy” is something that is generally concerning to power people. This democracy system has for a long time been the perfect tyranny, where you have a lower quality of life and less real personal freedom than any authoritarian system outside of the most hardcore forms of 20th century communism (the only extant remnant of that sort of thing being North Korea and to a lesser extent Cuba). They can do whatever they want to anyone in this system, but that ability is entirely based on faith in the system. They don’t want more people than necessary losing that faith. The Republicans briefly lost it in 2020, but Trump’s pitch of “we’ll just vote harder this time” has brought them back in the game.

A Trump victory in the fake election system is something I tried to prepare people for. But a lot of people did not get it and probably will not get it until their guts are pouring out in some godforsaken pit in the Middle East.

How American Election Fraud Works

In the wake of the 2020 election, Donald Trump had very few friends. In contesting the fraud, he was aided by Sidney Powell, a lifelong Justice Department operative; the MyPillow Guy, who is a crackhead; and Rudy Giuliani, who is about as shady as it gets.

This tri-force of Trump “allies” came up with a whole load of nonsense, focusing on electronic voting machines and inexplicably claiming that there were hackers in Venezuela flipping the votes. You’ll remember (or perhaps you forced yourself to forget) that Giuliani did a press conference in the parking lot of “Four Seasons Landscaping” after having “accidentally” booked that instead of the Four Seasons hotel.

How is that even possible? Why would a landscaping company with a building on a back lot in an industrial park take a booking for a political event? How would it be confirmed? How would they drive there and set up the equipment without realizing they were not in a luxury hotel, but a filthy parking lot? This was clearly done on purpose.

Powell did a massive media stunt where she kept claiming she was going to present evidence of “The Kraken” proving Dominion voting machine fraud and she never did. The whole thing was a shameful and pitiful mess.

It was sabotage.

Trump had no real allies and couldn’t seem to figure it out himself, but the reality was that the fraud had nothing to do with Dominion voting machines. It’s very obvious in hindsight what I was saying at the time: the mail-in ballots that were brought in under the guise of “coronavirus” allowed limitless fraud. States have the ability to print unlimited numbers of ballots and deliver them wherever they want.

It’s not particularly complicated. An unlimited number of ballots were distributed, and then they returned. No one knows what happened between the distribution and the return, and no signature verification audits were done, so no one will ever know. But we all saw the boards on the windows at the counting stations, we saw the trucks pull up after the count was “paused” at 3AM in swing states.

There were fraudulent votes arranged beforehand, but it turned out there were not enough to defeat Trump, so they shut down the counting stations and brought in new ballots. It was all done very publicly, with the media relying on the Jewish concept of the “big lie.”

We all saw Biden’s absurd 81 million, beating Obama 2012 by nearly 20 million votes. In my opinion, it would be impossible for a serious person to claim 2020 was on the level.

It may be obvious, but I should note that this fraud primarily took place in competitive “swing states,” or at least that is the only place it is widely organized. Specifically, we are talking about Democrat-run cities within purple states, notably Atlanta, Phoenix, Detroit, Milwaukee, and Philadelphia.

2022 was Even Faker Than 2020

Less understood than 2020 is the 2022 election fraud. This was a midterm election that people obviously considered less important, but it was arguably even more ridiculous than Joe Biden’s 81 million votes. A “red wave” was predicted, due to how disastrous Biden’s first 2 years were, but Republicans lost very badly. This was during hardcore coronavirus mania, with Republicans very politically engaged. The entire platform of the Democrats was “Trump is on the ballot,” which, in light of last Tuesday’s events, doesn’t seem to be a bad thing.

Florida was the one competitive state that actually took action against the mail-in ballot scam. In 2021, Ron DeSantis rammed through the best anti-fraud election law in America,  S.B. 90. (If you want to know the details, it’s probably best to read the bill’s detractors describe it.)

Florida Senator Marco Rubio, who isn’t and has never been very popular, was polling at 49%, and won with 58%, well outside of the margin of error for the polls.

Florida is a former “purple state,” where Ron DeSantis only beat a homosexual African crackhead by a faction of a percent in 2018. Arizona, also now considered “purple,” has much more history with the Democrat Party than Florida.

After supposedly going blue for the first time since Bill Clinton in 1996 (when Bob Dole lost because Ross Perot got 8% of the vote), Arizona was a focus of much right-wing attention in 2022, and the focus of a lot of money. Heavily funded Republican Arizona Senate candidate Blake Masters lost by 5 points after polls showed him ahead by at least 1 point (though not as remarkable as Rubio’s win, a six point spread is beyond the margin of error as well). Gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake, who was also heavily funded and aggressively promoted throughout the media, was polling a full 11 points ahead of her Democrat opponent and lost.

If you go through the 2022 elections, these discrepancies are everywhere. I am aware that the polls are usually wrong, but they are usually wrong in the way that skews it for Democrats, which the Florida polls did. There is no reason why Florida would be so different than every other competitive state in the country. The official explanation as to why things were so different in Florida was that Ron DeSantis was just really, really popular and he lifted up the rest of the Republicans. However, Ron DeSantis was in the middle of several scandals at the time, including his war against Disney, which no one liked, and criticism over the fact he was planning to use the office as a springboard to run for president. I’m sure DeSantis is popular enough, but this does not explain the difference between Florida and the rest of the country.

The explanation is that Florida had a Republican governor who passed a good anti-fraud law. The other (supposedly) competitive state with a Republican governor was Georgia, which also passed some laws after 2020, though not as good. Arizona, along with Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin all had Democrat governments that did not pass laws against voter fraud after 2020, allowing the full coronavirus ballot measures in 2022 (and 2024).

2024 was Not “Too Big to Fix”

In 2024, Kamala got approximately 10 million fewer votes than Joe Biden got in 2020. At time of writing (they’re apparently still counting), Kamala has 70 million compared to Biden’s 81 million.

Based on historical trends, it can be reasonably estimated that 10-15 million is roughly the number of fraudulent ballots that were counted in 2020. It is ridiculous on its face to suggest that Joe Biden did better than Obama 2008, which was the previous number of most votes ever for a US presidential candidate (frankly, there had to have been some fraud to get Kamala to 71 million).

It’s worth noting that while Republicans seem intent on not asking any questions as to where the fraud went, many Redditors and other leftists are very confused by this math. They obviously don’t understand the implications in the way Trump supporters would, so they are free to ask the question.

Trump got the same number votes in 2024 that he got in 2020. We obviously don’t know the real number of Democrat votes; Kamala may have gotten fewer real votes than Joe Biden, but it was well within their ability to scam this election, and they could have done it much smoother than they did in 2020, without shutting down the count at 3AM.

If It’s Possible to Commit Fraud, And Yet the People With That Power Decide Not to Do So, It’s Still a Rigged Election

The Democrats have the mechanism to commit fraud, and yet they decided not to use that mechanism in this election.

I’ve written a lot about the fact that Israel knew the Hamas attack was going to happen and did nothing to stop it and instead allowed it to happen. Effectively, when you have the ability to prevent something from happening and you allow it to happen, you are responsible for it. Just so, the Democrats are responsible for the election of Donald Trump.

Along with not doing fraud, they effectively threw the race. They waited to remove Joe Biden, refusing a primary, then sabotaged him, then replaced him with Kamala, again refusing a primary, then didn’t even bother to coach Kamala or otherwise shape her into a remotely viable candidate.

Obviously, the people around Joe Biden knew that has was not a viable candidate in a real election in 2020, and they could have very easily done a primary for the 2024 election and put forward a more viable candidate. Instead, they took him out behind the shed very late, then still refused to do a primary. If they actually wanted a real election, or at least a more believable fake election, they could easily have called Gavin Newsom (who was begging for the job), ran him through a primary, and then had him go out and denounce Joe Biden’s economic agenda, open borders madness, violent crime legalization scheme, and child tranny programs. He could have done large and energetic rallies. He might have won without fraud, but at the very least, the fraud would have been believable.

The Democrats did not even try, and in fact, actively sabotaged themselves.

Why?

There are several different factors that would lead to the decision by the Democrats to lose the election, but the primary reason is that powerful Jews preferred him to handle the Middle East conflict.

Most Trump supporters who believe that fraud happen in 2020 are very excited about the 2024 victory. They are simply in a state of cognitive dissonance and not questioning why it is that their dream came true. Among the few attempting to explain why the fraud machine was not activated, the popular retort is that Democrats didn’t want to risk doing another fraudulent election because they worried about being too obvious and actually triggering some kind of violent peasant uprising. It seems unlikely they would actually be particularly concerned about that, given that Americans are very fat and pathetic babies.

With the claim that “they didn’t do it because it was too obvious,” you then have to consider the fact that this would have been a decision made in 2021, after the Stop the Steal movement and January 6th. If this was the thinking, they could have simply held a primary. It’s also unclear how “it’s too obvious and there will be an uprising” could be communicated to the masses of leftists who are not making any attempt to protest the vote. CNN and the New York Times opinion column are very calm and seemingly unbothered by Trump, wishing him the best. There are no Antifa riots, no pussyhat marches, and most notably of all, no claims of “Russian hacking” (in fact, instead of Russian hacking, we have “Iranian assassination plot”). Some media attempted to bring up Russian hacking earlier in the year, but it was squashed and never became a part of the narrative surrounding the election. This only makes sense if it is a Jewish agenda, that the Jews understand that Trump is being put in for the sake of Israel.

Maybe “it would be too obvious” is something that crossed these people’s minds and factored into the calculus. It’s also possible that they wanted the right-wing to believe in democracy again, and were less bothered by neo-Trump, who is pro-abortion, pro-gay, pro-immigration, and everything else. He moderated a lot in 2020, but he moderated himself into a whole other shape in 2024, and that was a part of the process of appealing to powerful Jews who decide elections.

Ultimately, we watched the media narrative about Trump shift after October 7th, we saw big Jewish donors and other powerful people shift towards Trump, we saw social media lighten up on the censorship of pro-Trump material, we saw Netanyahu, who has total control over US policy, demanding Trump. I am making the argument that this is the reason the Democrats stood down: he’s a much better figurehead for the wars Israel wants the US to fight. He will be better at getting young whites to sign up to go get their legs blown off in a way that has nothing to do with American interests.

The mechanism through which Netanyahu would be allowed to determine the outcome of a US presidential election is not something I would be aware of, but one would have to assume it’s the same mechanism that allows him to make decisions on behalf of the US government as regards US support for Israel. The Biden administration begged him to not attack Rafah, to not invade Lebanon, to deescalate with Iran. Biden said “red line,” saying he would stop weapons shipments, then he did not follow through.

He then issued another red line that was to expire on November 15, obviously after the election when it does not matter.

Through some mechanism which is not immediately apparent (but which is easy to imagine), Bibi Netanyahu has a stranglehold on the US government. If he is capable of leading the Democrat establishment into a massive war in the Middle East, while the US is not capable of doing anything other than begging him not to, it seems obvious that he has the ability to order the Democrat government not to do election fraud. Whether this mechanism is dependent on control over the media, threats and blackmail, the ability of the Israel lobby to manipulate individual politicians, or some combination, I do not know.

I do know, however, that Trump is going to be very good to Israel, and I know that Trump would be a lot better at recruiting for the military and pushing a patriotic war for Israel than Kamala Harris or any other Democrat would be.

I’ll Be Proved Right or Wrong Soon Enough

Whether or not Trump was allowed to win in order to serve the interests of Israel will become obvious one way or the other in the very near future, and should be obvious before he’s even elected. “Staff is policy” is the phrase many right-wingers critical of Trump’s first term have used, so his cabinet picks will tell you quite a bit about what he plans to do. He said this weekend that “Nikki Haley” and Mike Pompeo will not be invited back, but Marco Rubio and Tom Cotton are the same exact people.

The head of his transition team, Jewish billionaire Howard Lutnik, has said he took the job to serve Israel.

Trump has already publicly threatened Iran with war. You could say that is just “Trump being Trump” or whatever, but he’s said it. He’s also repeatedly said he wants Israel to finish off Gaza, something which is increasingly becoming very unlikely without first confronting Iran (viz, Gaza can’t be finished with taking out Hezbollah, which can’t be done without taking out Iran).

Bibi is totally committed to war with Iran and Donald Trump received $100,000,000 from Miriam Adelson on a pledge to support Bibi’s agenda. To me, it seems frankly ridiculous to suppose that Trump is not going to do some kind of war with Iran, but again, we’ll know soon enough.

A caveat: recently, there has been much talk of Bibi’s various scandals, as well as rumors of Russia being brought in to help Israel do a ceasefire with Hezbollah. If Bibi is forced out of office, then the whole calculus changes. If Bibi is forced out, there is going to be an investigation into what exactly happened on October 7th, and that is going to cause serious chaos in Israel. I think this is unlikely, but as I am making predictions here, I want to make sure I’m covering all the bases.

Isn’t It Still Better Though?

Even understanding all of this, it would still be possible to prefer Trump be in office for various reasons. From my perspective, it is actually worse, because now right-wing people are all buying back into the system, when previously they were ready to abandon it and start looking for other options as to how to solve the problems of America. It’s also going to be sad when young white men line up to go fight in Israel’s wars.

But there will be things that are better. At least at first, the economy is going to be much better. It’s also possible the Ukraine war will end.

Other than those two things, however, I think people are getting way too excited, and many or even most of the material I see is bordering on delusional, QAnon tier lunacy. Bobby Kennedy is not going to be installed as the head of the CIA and uncover the mystery of the murders of his father and uncle, nor is Ron Paul going to abolish the fed. The FBI going to be sent into the tunnels under Comet Pizza. No one from the Biden Administration is going to be prosecuted, the coronavirus vaccine will not be investigated, there will not be mass deportations. You can screenshot this. None of that stuff is happening.

In the beginning, there will be some kind of display. A few Honduran child murderers (or whatever) might get deported. Maybe RFK will change school lunches. But there will not be a revolution.

I don’t like being the one to tell you this. I know some people are very excited, and I’m not trying to rain on anyone’s parade. I like Trump too, as a personality. But this is real life. The problems in America are extremely dire. This is the most degenerate society that has ever existed. You’re not going to fix it by voting.

We’re never going back to 2010. We can go forward or we can wither and die. Unlike US elections, that is a decision that is up to the people.

There is an impulse people have to celebrate “simplicity” as virtuous.

There is an idea of the “noble savage,” that is the idea that primitive people are romantic and experience life at some greater level than more intelligent people. This concept was integrated into left philosophy, but it seems to have universal appeal in the minds of modern men, who have a drive to find a mythical nirvana among the natural world.

There were various hoaxes surrounding the politicized leftist version this notion, mostly claiming that primitive people lived without the social restraints imposed by Christian civilization. The most notable is the infamous Margaret Meade Somoan hoax, which was promoted all through Western culture, including by Sigmund Freud. Meade, an anthropologist, claimed in her most famous work Coming of Age in Samoa (1928) that these island primitives lived in a sexual utopia without guilt or shame. This was believed in academia for decades before the debunking began, and it wasn’t fully debunked until the 1980s, when the people used as examples in the book, by then very old, went on record saying Meade just made it all up.

A twist on the “noble savage” concept is the idea that rural peasants are, while not chasing around buffalo, have a more uncorrupted character than urban people. This is perhaps the right-wing version of this romanticization of primitive life as superior and desirable. Most people on the internet appear to believe that there are a lot of “real Americans” in urban areas living truly masculine, peaceful lives. In reality, however, most rural people in America are obese, stupid, and on drugs. Any farming that they do is totally chemically polluted. Most of them live on welfare and sit around watching TV all day. Virtually all young people in these areas want to move to the big city and engage in all of the things we all despise.

I’ve reached the conclusion that it is better to live in a rural area, because it does bring peace to be away from the deranged lunacy of a modern city, but this is a patrician understanding, and not something that the peasants who live in rural areas naturally understand. A peasant is always going to be inclined towards base behavior, which is why people in third world countries, rather than doing organic farming and communing with nature, engage in mass deforestation, large scale industrial pollution, and throw plastic trash everywhere, making most of the land uninhabitable. If poor people were not stupid, they would not be poor.

Just so, there is an instinct on both left and right to promote “the working class,” as if there is something noble about them. Again, if you look at the working class, you’re just going to find a bunch of stupid, fat people on drugs engaged in absurdly degenerate behavior. More intelligent people have higher morality, and if you take moral boundaries away from the peasants, they just go completely nuts.

There’s nothing wrong with stupid, poor people. They should be helped by the rest of society. Certainly when it comes to white Americans, our country has a duty to try and bring these people up out of the pit they are in. They are worse off than the middle classes because they don’t have the intelligence to navigate a society that has become a free for all.

However, none of this should be celebrated, and no one should think it is good to be stupid and poor. It’s not good at all. There is nothing noble about it. It’s disgusting. You shouldn’t be ashamed to feel that way. Fat people are disgusting. It is disgusting to leave the television on all day when you have other people in your house. Industrial pollution is disgusting. The preindustrial primitive peoples of the world lived better than modern third worlders, I’m sure, but their societies were largely barbaric and cruel, and they were anti-intellectual. There is nothing to celebrate here.

People should seek for a higher ideal, always. As I say, there is a higher ideal in living closer to nature, and in my experience, this does bring a certain amount of genuine peace. However, that understanding is intellectual. I’m sure that there are people who live in rural areas in America who have come to an understanding about the benefits of living closer to the land, and I’m sure some of them are not fat. But on the whole, living in a rural area, or with modest means, does not bring enlightenment, but rather the reverse: more enlightened people seek a simpler life.

Intelligent people (all Daily Stormer readers are intelligent) should not be ashamed of this or imagine that they’d have been better off as a peasant.

It’s easy to forget that I’ve been writing about these same issues for more than 13 years, with the Daily Stormer coming up on its 12th anniversary. Frankly, everything is easy to forget because life just drone on and on.

There are a lot of things that I simply take it for granted that the reader understands. I don’t want to talk down to the reader by explaining basics repeatedly, but I think I do need to go back and go through the core, foundational issues upon which the ideas presented here are based. I do not think that everyone has been here for the entire ride.

I’m going to try to do this in the future, to write significant articles on the various topics we discuss here.

Briefly, I will give an overview.

Jews

Most of the site is about Jews. The core idea is that Jews are fundamentally opposed to all other peoples, with a special hatred for Christians. When we talk about “The Jews,” we are talking about a collective, rather than individuals. There may be individuals Jews who disagree with each other, and there may even be Jews who disagree with the Jewish collective, but on the whole, Jews will always ask “what’s good for the Jews,” and they will put their own interests above everyone else’s.

Clearly, any group of people should put its interests first, and every group does that other than whites. The Jews are particular, however, because they have always lived amongst other people, without their own labor force or military, and thus their interests have always involved exploiting other people to take things from them. Finally, after the second world war, they got a country, but the country itself functions as a parasite on the rest of the world.

Furthermore, Jews have perverse, neurotic tendencies, which relate to a desire to weaken the people they live amongst. One simply has to look at the way the United States funnels cash to Israel to see how this works. If the United States was an educated, healthy, moral country, no one would stand for this practice of transferring money to the Israel, of committing to all of these wars in their name, but because the United States is a broken, sickening nation of fat slobs with very low morality, no one is willing to take a stand on anything. Many Americans are so fat and stupid they think Israel is good.

The reason Jews are like this is genetic. Behavior is usually genetic. Jews wanted to deliberately remain separate from the people they lived among. The Jewish religion preaches that Jews are chosen by their god because of their bloodline, that they are superior to everyone else, and they therefore must manipulate and control those whose labor they feed on. That’s literally what the religion says, it’s not something that’s up for debate. In a longer form, I would take the time to cite some sources, but it’s not a question. The question is what are the results of such a religion, and the answer to that is that you breed very specific types of individuals.

If you think about America and all of the European groups coming here, none of them kept to their own in this way, at least not deliberately, over many generations. In general, people feel closer to people who are genetically similar to them. This is a part of race, which I will summarize below, so people do often tend to breed with people from a similar ethnic background. However, for most peoples, this sort of slowly falls away. As groups live together and speak the same language, they will begin mixing, particularly if they are not visibly much different than one another. There are still groups of Irish and Italians on the East Coast, but in the rest of the country, not so much. If it does exist, it’s like my personal situation where my parents were not thinking about their Irishness but subconsciously were attracted to each other for that reason (Irish men and women look for someone who is into abuse).

However, America is not that old. The Jews have been doing this “separation” thing for two thousand years. Jewish culture is totally satanic and bizarre, and fixated on abuse. The things these people do are grotesque, and they are completely miserable. So, for two thousand years, Jews who lived in that culture had the option of just leaving. Any individual Jew who didn’t like that culture and didn’t want to be a part of it could have simply left, gotten baptized, married a Christian woman. And many of them did throughout history. But what happens then is the ones that don’t leave continue to breed with one another and strengthen the racial characteristics of a group of people who enjoys being a loathsome parasite, enjoys taking part in a religion that celebrates the murder of Christ and preaches that all other people on earth are “human animals.” The Jews purified their blood in this manner, creating a race of super parasites.

Race

Perhaps I should start with the race issue when I break these things down one at a time, because understanding race is necessary for understanding Jews. Race is rather simple and obvious: it’s not really different than dog breeds. With dogs, you have a single species that has been bred into all of these different shapes and sizes. They not only look different, but they have different behaviors and different levels of intelligence. Some of them (pit bulls, which are akin to blacks) are much more prone to violence.

Simply put, race is an expression of genetics, and just as genetics make up the totality of an individual, so do they make up the totality of a group.

The stupidest anti-racist lie is that race is “the color of the skin.” If race was “only skin deep,” there really wouldn’t be a problem with mixing the races together, and as soon as they spoke the same language, they would begin to mix and the differences would disappear in a few hundred years. The issue is what is under the skin, specifically in the brain region. Black people, for instance, are less intelligent than whites. If race was skin deep, Gary, Indiana would not look like the slums of Nigeria.

No one should hate any other race. I mean, they can if they want to, I don’t care. I can see why they would. But it doesn’t really serve any purpose and will just make you exhausted. The basic reality is that most races are not compatible with one another and diversity creates conflict and tensions. There are various sources on this issue, which I will cite in the future, but the Robert Putnam paper on diversity is good, in particular because he is a liberal who was against his own data.

An infant can tell if someone is related to them. No one really knows how that works, but babies can sense familial relations, which is why stranger adoption does not work very well (even within your own race). Babies never want their mother to leave, but if the mother does leave, they want one of their aunts, a sister, or someone else related genetically to care for them. You feel more comfortable around your family, as people probably know. This extends to cousins and so on. Then it spreads out to your ethnic group and your race. It’s sort of obvious: you feel more comfortable around people who are more similar to you. You have more empathy for these people and you trust them more.

The other races – everyone other than whites – is aware that they are members of groups and they act on this. Whites, ironically because of various genetic traits, have been convinced that “race does not exist,” and that it is evil to be a part of a group and work for group interests. Whites are being dispossessed without even understanding what is happening because their heads have been filled with psychobabble from the Jews. Everyone coming into our countries is trying to get whatever they can get for themselves, their families, and their racial group, while we go around oblivious, convinced these people coming in are all just random individuals.

The differences in the races are irrelevant if people do not live together. Everyone used to have their own countries. Now, everyone but whites have their own countries, and white countries are for everyone (except for whites). Mass immigration and multiculturalism are Jewish agendas, in part because Jews want to cover up the fact that they are a different race by creating a situation where no one knows what is happening with races, and in part because, as stated, they do not want the nations they feed off of to be strong and healthy, and mass immigration weakens countries.

Of course, immigration is a scam. They tell you that this is to be nice to these people, but there are billions of people in the third world and they can’t all come to white countries. The reality is that if this was about being nice, we would just send these countries money instead of bringing them to our countries. It is something like ten times more efficient to send aid to foreign countries rather than bring people into white countries. So it would be better for both parties if we did it that way.

Furthermore, some of the migrations have been caused by wars started by Jews. Most people don’t want to leave their own countries and go live in a foreign country on welfare. The only people who do want to do that are low-level scum, which is who white countries are inviting in. The countries that are not involved in wars or conflicts created by the United States are not even that poor anymore. Mexico certainly isn’t poor – they exported all their scum and criminals to the United States a long time ago. Even black Africa is not poor in the way people tend to think of it. No one is starving in anywhere other than a few war zones.

Mass immigration is not about helping brown people, it is about hurting white people.

Women

It would be impossible to write a short summary of my views on women. I’ll do my best to try.

Women are whores.

That’s all.

No. Let’s see.

Basically, just like they tell you that the races are all the same, they tell you women are the same as men. Women know this isn’t true, but the lie benefits them, so they naturally promote it.

With women, everything is about sex, because sex is the only thing women have to offer, and offering sex to the best man is the only way they can achieve anything. Sex is the only way a woman can interact with the world, and her only important decisions are about sex. A woman wants to be pregnant by the man best able to provide for her. However, women are stupid, and they don’t really process their own sexual urges, and therefore their sexual decisions do not make sense when observed by a man. These sexual urges are very primitive, and are totally botched in a world of sterile sex (where women do not get pregnant as a result of sex, or can kill the child before it is born).

The core idea is this: women are physically weak and everything they have is from men. Obviously, in the modern technological system, they can live alone and work at some stupid job and get money without having a husband. However, men built that modern world, without which they would need to return to trading sex for food and shelter from the elements.

An underlying theme in my thought process is that humans are not designed for the modern world. The brain of the human is based around the way the world was before modern technology. This has really screwed up sexuality and has botched reproduction. Whereas men masturbate to pornography, women go online and have thousands of men messaging them. Although women relate to the world through sex, their actual drive for sex is very low, unless they are ovulating. They enjoy using their sexuality to influence men, with the goal of acquiring both emotional and physical resources. Women will never admit to this (Madonna’s “Material Girl” was written by a man), and will instead gaslight men while claiming to be a victim.

The reason we do not have families in the West (or Asia) anymore is because young women would much prefer to go around manipulating all the men they can find, feeling very good about themselves. In modern Western society, from puberty until the mid to late twenties, a woman is basically like a god, capable of manipulating any men in her vicinity. They crave attention because they do not have their own self-esteem and thus must have it externally formed. That is the kind of sentence that really needs elaborated on with several paragraphs.

All these ideas really need elaborated on, and now, I don’t think short summaries were a very good idea. I’m picturing in my head a person who has simply followed the schooling system, followed the media, and believes all of the lies of this society, and how I would explain these issues to him, and I think the reality is that it takes a lot of words.

The unfortunate part is that our ancestors – most of our grandparents, definitely our great-grandparents – knew all of this without having to have it explained to them (with the exception maybe being the Jews, but they could simply observe the Jews and draw obvious conclusions, because they hadn’t been brainwashed to believe that groups do not exist).

The other people that understand all of this are all nonwhite people. You’re not going to find any nonwhite person who thinks “all races are the same” or that “women are equal.” They might agree to those statements, because they will think you are talking about lives having value, but they do not look at people as being all the same. This is gibberish that only a totally brainwashed person could ever believe.

White people in the West have definitely undergone very serious brainwashing. From the time of birth, people have been lied to about the most basic realities. It is a lot of work, and it is very painful, for an individual to break out of that brainwashing. It’s easier for people who grew up in conservative families. Modern conservatives believe most of these lies society tells, but they at least have a framework for understanding. If you grew up without the influence of conservative parents, understanding anything at all is basically impossible.

Other Issues

There are other main issues, including but not limited to:

• Homosexuals
• Hitler
• Christianity
• Diet and physical fitness
• Work
• Management of the male sexual urge

Hopefully, I can write 3-5,000 word essays about all of these things, then perhaps collect them into a book that people can share.

I’m going to have to actually draw up outlines, which is not something I’ve done in a long time, because these ideas need to be ordered in order to be accessible. There has to be a starting point of relatability. Maybe I will start with common experiences. That should be easy enough with race and women, maybe I would start with those and then move to the Jews. You really do have to understand the concept of genetics and groups before understanding Jews. There are also many similarities between Jews and women.

It’s a big job, but I’m a big guy and I can take it.

PS

Please send crypto.

I don’t really have anything.

Well, I have something, but I decided early not to publish it.

I have a link to a forum (which I post on) which has a list of people’s favorite articles from me over a period going back ten years:

Best of Anglin Volume 1: 2015-23

I think I had more good articles than that. I’ve written so, so much. It’s so many millions of words.

It’s been a long, strange trip.

It’s no good whining about it, I know, but it’s existential what happened to me and the site, the censorship and the ban from making any money. I am not allowed to make money. I’m not even allowed to have a personal bank account.

I will do a donation drive soon. Hopefully people will be generous. I just realized this week a couple people who wanted to do calls on the app I didn’t get back with, I’ll do that soon. Left like four people hanging on that, which I apologize for. To be fair I didn’t give a timeline, but this is a bit ridiculous. There were just a lot more people wanting to talk than I had expected.

My midlife crisis is ongoing and has been very difficult. Most of it relates to the kind of failure of this website project, which was intended to be a large media operation, but was sabotaged brutally in a way that I did not understand was possible when I started the website.

I made a comment about Julian Assange being naive, thinking that Western governments would follow their own rules, but a decade ago, I was also naive. I would not have imagined that this kind of internet censorship, that a global ban from banking, was even possible, let alone that making politically incorrect jokes would lead to such a fate.

I’ve long ago dealt with the reality of what happened to me and my project, but during the midlife crisis, I’ve attempted to figure out a way forward, for the next half of my life, where I do something meaningful. Although the first part of my career was sabotaged like no one has ever been sabotaged before or since, it was meaningful. I invented internet antisemitism and I injected all of my narratives into the mainstream. Though it wasn’t what I wanted it to be, it surely was not a waste of time.

But I’m at a different point in my life now, and I want to make sure I keep doing meaningful things. Basically, that is going to be writing that is published on this website, regardless, but I need to do something more meaningful than simply giving daily updates on wars, which is not particularly interesting to me. It is interesting to me, but it’s surely not the most interesting thing to me.

A year ago, I had visions during the Illness Revelations, and I believe this offered a kind of path forward. Probably, October 7th and that sickness will replace January 1st or my birthday as the main marker of the passage of time, so the fact that I’m a year out now is very relevant to me and a time for reflection. In the last year, I’ve had a pretty hard time. But I think in this next year, things are going to start taking form. I’m working on a lot of different things and I’m organizing my life in a way that will allow them to come through.

Basically, over the course of the rest of my life, I want to do several (or many) series of structured essays, several novels and many short stories, write a video game, and hopefully make some films. On the whole, I want to do things that help boys and young men deal with live and the universe and everything.

At the end, I want to die in a cinematic manner, fighting Jewish robots.

Or, conversely, I want to die old, from lung and/or liver disease, after the Jews are dislodged from power.

Hopefully, somewhere in there, I can also make some money. It’s difficult to not have any natural form of income, and to not have any idea what kind of money I’m going to have in a decade or two. Again, not trying to whine, just saying, it’s something I think about and it creates stupid problems. The only thing I want to do, the only thing I’ve ever wanted to do since I was 11-years-old, is to write. In that sense, my dreams have come true, and I’m thankful for that.

I want to thank you all for reading and for supporting me. I could never thank you enough. Even if you’re a hate-reader, I love you for coming every day and using your eyes and your brain to give life to my words.

I don’t know if you want to know this, but the summer is way over and it is almost time for the holidays.

I don’t mean “the holidays” as in “happy holidays” as in “I’m sorry you’re Jewish,” I mean “holidays” in that there is a period with several holidays in it, leading up to Christmas and then New Years.

This is September and Thanksgiving is in October. Actually, Thanksgiving might be in November? I don’t really recall. I generally just wait for someone else to inform me on such matters.

It’s basically Christmas.

Every year, I try to remind people not to harass their families about the Jews (or other political issues) during family events. This is a waste of time and it will ruin your relationships, to no benefit of you or them.

It’s not really that close to the holidays, so I’m not writing that article yet. However, in order to get people thinking about it before I write that article, I have collected three of my previous articles dealing with this topic, which you may enjoy:

• Manly Advice: Do Not Spend the Holidays Trying to Redpill Your Family! Do Not Even Mention Politics!
• Self-Help Sunday: You Must Forgive Your Boomer Parents
• On Dave Chappelle, Alex Jones, Andrew Anglin, And the Jews

That third one is a rambling sort of mess written when I was ill, but it includes these themes. The first two are merely discussions of these themes.

I will write another one when it is closer to the holidays.

Please leave a like and comment below. In particular, comment on anything that is not in these articles you would like to see in the new version. I tend to write the same articles over and over, but I try to include new things. I’m not sure there can be anything new here, but let me know if you think of something.

Remember to smash that subscribe button and ring my bells.

This Sunday’s article is a follow-up to last Sunday’s article. I wrote about the fact that no one can actually change the world unless they are the ruler of a country, and that people shouldn’t spend time stressing out about things they can’t change, and instead focus on things they can change. It was a version of Reinhold Niebuhr’s serenity prayer:

God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Living one day at a time;
enjoying one moment at a time;
accepting hardships as the pathway to peace;
taking, as He did, this sinful world
as it is, not as I would have it;
trusting that He will make all things right
if I surrender to His Will;
that I may be reasonably happy in this life
and supremely happy with Him
forever in the next.
Amen.

(Note: I am wholly opposed to Alcoholics Anonymous, which is a cult that destroy’s people’s lives. That’s an article for another Sunday. I also don’t support a lot of what Niebuhr, who was not a member of AA, believed. But this is a good prayer based solidly in Christian principles. I also do not intend to explicitly promote Stoicism or Transcendentalism, or any other philosophical framework that has established terminology.)

Several people responded by claiming that I was “preaching defeatism” by telling people they do not have the ability to change the policies of the US government. I want to be perfectly clear: if you have the ability to change the policies and behavior of the US government, you should definitely do that. It would be really great if someone would change the policies of the US government, so if you can, please do it.

Anyone with the power to change the behavior of the US government has an absolute moral responsibility to do so. Therefore, if you have that ability, you need to do it immediately. Everyone should do the right thing in their personal lives. Changing the government, if you have that ability, is the right thing to do.

However, the reality is that most of you do not have that ability. In fact, I don’t think any individual on earth has the ability to change the behavior of the US government. When Donald Trump was president, he couldn’t even give orders to his subordinates. If the US president is the most powerful single individual on earth, as is claimed and is possibly in the range of the truth, then I suspect you, dear reader, do not have that ability either.

What I see in my role as host of a website that speaks of what is happening in the world is that people become obsessed with world events, that they lose their ability to properly function in their personal lives because of this obsession. This is a very bad thing. It’s bad for people on a personal level, it’s bad for the people around them, their family and friends, and further, it’s bad for the society at large. If people are going to change Western governments for the better, most of them are going to be well-adjusted individuals with functional personal lives.

I would never tell people to disregard what is happening in the world or to stop paying attention to it. My job is to tell people about what is going on, so obviously I think it’s important that you know. Knowing is, after all, half the battle. There may come a time when it is necessary to take action, together with others, to change the way things are going. I have no idea what that will look like, and I would certainly never endorse offensive violence of any kind. And it’s possible that this will not happen in your lifetime anyway. We don’t know what is going to happen. The best we can do is do our best.

If you wake up every morning and strive to do the right thing, there is no reason to be carrying around a burden of things you cannot control. This should simply be obvious, but I have seen so many people become obsessed, and it appears that there is some kind of psychological mechanism at work, whereby people feel that their own personal anguish is a form of resistance against the system. I was shocked by the number of replies I got to last Sunday’s article, claiming that I was “preaching defeatism.”

What I am preaching is that your life has meaning beyond what is happening in the world. You have a purpose in your life, a purpose laid out for you, a great man that you could become if you follow the correct path. Becoming obsessed with politics and things you have no ability to change only weakens your ability to focus on following the correct path and becoming the best man you can be.

Look at the situation in Springfield, Ohio. No one who lives there can do anything about it. People are doing the right thing, organizing and protesting the city, documenting what is happening, turning the town’s plight into a national cause for action. But that’s all they can do. They can’t start killing Haitians. If they did, they would go to prison, and then the media and the government would point at them and say that this is a reason for more immigrants. They would pass laws named after the Haitians that were killed, using it as a platform to bring in millions more Haitians and people from everywhere else. You all know that’s what they would do. We’ve seen it many times before. When Brenton Tarrant killed dozens of immigrants in Christchurch, New Zealand – all adult men who some might have considered to be enemy combatants and therefore valid military targets – the female prime minister of the country turned the killings into a major cause and used it to ban guns and bring in many more immigrants to “stop hate.”

Therefore, if you are in Springfield, and you’ve complained to the government, you’ve documented the Haitian behavior, you’ve organized protests, and nothing happens, you don’t even have the option of sacrificing yourself for the greater good and going out in a blaze of glory, because doing so would only empower the enemy. The only thing you can do in that situation is pack your things and move somewhere else where there aren’t Haitians. You take your family and you get out. You’re going to be in a better place to do that if instead of going around worrying about things you can’t control, you’ve focused on making money.

Some people hate hearing that they should run away from diversity. They will say that if everyone runs, eventually there will be nowhere left to run. This is a good philosophical argument, but it doesn’t actually speak to the reality of the world we live in. People will talk about “making a stand,” but as I just explained, even if you were willing to sacrifice your life and go kill a bunch of foreign invaders before the cops came to kill you in defense of the invaders, it would do nothing but make things worse. So what does “taking a stand” actually look like? Well, it is only possible if everyone else is doing it. If everyone was doing it, there wouldn’t be a need for violence (at least not illegal violence). But that time is not now and you can’t make it happen. You can’t force everyone to take a stand. The only thing you can actually do is protect yourself and your family. And the better off you are in your own head, the less you waste your personal soul energy on worrying about things you can’t control, the better off you are going to be when the time comes for a change.

Things have to change. That is just a fact. This system cannot go on forever. It is too unnatural, too evil, too entirely based on lies. The lies that serve as the basis for this system are not even good lies. They are stupid lies. It is unsustainable. Something is going to happen and this system is going to end as all systems inevitably do. You absolutely should do whatever is in your power to make that happen. But the reality is, very little of it is in your power. All you need to do is distinguish, in your own mind, the things that you have the ability to change from the things you have no ability to change, and your life will all of the sudden become a whole lot easier.

Furthermore, you should enjoy your life. King Solomon was the wisest man who ever lived, and after seeking enlightenment his whole life, he concluded that the best thing a man could do in this life is eat, drink, and be merry. When the real revolution finally comes, it is going to be fun. It is going to be a lot more fun than a bunch of people flipping out and getting angry on the internet, I can tell you that much.

Life is short. It is too short to be angry and stressed out all the time.

Please, just try to relax, and focus on the things you can control.

Hello, friends.

I had sort of a chilled out day today. Just relaxing.

But I wanted to wish everyone a happy Easter.

Christ is Risen!

I told you last Sunday that I’d been on a sort of half-assed vacation, in which half of my ass is working and the other half is relaxing.

There’s no real structure to this, and some days are going to be better than others, as we get back to full interestingness here on the Daily Stormer (formerly Tranny Watch).

I think this last week was as boring as the week before that. Actually, there was some stuff I was pretty proud of this week, even though there wasn’t any (good) long think piece.

These were all okay, in my view:

• “Omicron Continues to Spell Total Doom for Earth” -Filthy Lying Jew Terrorist Media
• @jack Just Quit Twitter
• Braindead American Peasants Say China is the Real Threat
• Brandon Bringing Back Remain in Mexico

And I think the filler was a lot better this week.

I’ll also just note, I’m also pretty proud of this meme:

I don’t usually note that I create a specific meme. I actually think people who put their names on memes are metaphysically evil. Part of the whole philosophy of memes is that they are all from our shitlord hive mind. Like, someone invented Wojak, someone invented the NPC, someone invented that four panel, then I wrote a text.

The joy one feels when he sees one of his memes reposted is a personal private joy, but it is also a collective internet joy, showing that we are all contributing. Also, someone who posts the correct meme in the correct situation, even if he had nothing to do with making it, is in a way as important as the person who made the meme originally.

I’m just pointing out that I made that Fauci puppies NPC meme because I want to assure everyone that even if the quality is not the best these days, I’m not off the ball.

I also made this meme:

Just joking.

That’s a picture of something that is happening in real life all across the Western world right now.

But don’t worry – everything is fine and this is all normal.

Frankly, I’m not even sure the quality is noticeably different by anyone other than me, and I’m a little worried that by apologizing for it, I’m going to make people think things are worse than they actually are. However, in terms of shaping expectations: I expect this week to be even better than last week, which was better than both the weeks before that.

And before “hire other writers” – that has always been a disaster. It’s more work than me just doing it all myself. Also, no one ever donates. Did I mention that you should donate? Do it now while the dip is still in progress! If you send Monero at $200 and it’s worth $300 again in two weeks, it’s like you donated 150%! (Actually, it’s not really very much like that, because math is really complicated and dumb.)

Wait, so what was the thing here…?

Hello? Content department?

Ah, yes. I promised something remotely interesting.

Well, I was on the Gamer Uprising forum, and people were talking about work. Someone said that they made six figures working in the energy sector before getting laid off. They noted that it was not bad work, but very physically straining, and could involve exposure to chemicals.

Then someone replied: “That sounds awesome; but of course the intensity of the work probably cancelled out much of the beneficial aspect of the job.”

I then wrote the following rambling comment in response (this is the meat of this thing you’re reading right now): 

Intense work is generally rewarding. It’s the health hazards that are the problem. I don’t know about carrying the bags, it depends on what techniques are available and also the speed and quantity, but exposure to the chemicals is definitely always bad.

As a teenager I worked loading trucks at several warehouses, and it was very high intensity, in terms of movement, but heavy lifting was not at all consistent and there were never any chemicals. But the days just flew by.

One good thing was that there was a lot of variety, and if you were good with the managers, you could request switching up duties multiple times per day. Everything but the forklift was high speed (because OSHA faggotry).

Honestly, I loved that work, and if it was possible to feed a family and have a nice house and truck working like that, I would have had no problem just doing it forever.

I felt the same way about SOME of the construction work I did, actually. Though construction almost always involves chemical exposure. Even just doing drywall and plaster. Especially in older houses (which is what I enjoyed the most), you’ve got to constantly be thinking about lead and asbestos. Even sanding petrol-based paints should involve a respirator, though everyone just used a corona style mask. Refinishing wood involves all kinds of toxic chemicals. And on and on. But the work itself is great.

Mechanic work is interesting too, though I’ve only casual experience. But it has nothing near the intensity of warehouse or construction.

All this having been said, I imagine that the cliche about assembly line work being hell is very true, despite the intensity. There is no variety or creativity involved in the way there is in a warehouse or construction.

Anyway, I’m always thankful I had these experiences, because aside from what I learned about life from the experiences, I think it gives me an ability to speak to normal working people in a way that most people raised middle class don’t have an ability to do. Along with experiencing the work, I experienced the people.

The biggest problem with the people who I worked with was baby mama drama and substance abuse, both of which are issues which should be mitigated by the state and are instead incentivized by the state. Most people don’t really understand how no-fault divorce and the larger sexual revolution decimated the working class. The substance abuse issues mostly stem from the domestic problems.

It would literally cost the government nothing to reinstate marriage as a legal contract and to abolish family courts and award the children to whichever parent had the highest income potential (i.e., the father in 99.99% of working class situations). The ruling class can hide behind utopianism, but the real reason for abolishing marriage (which no-fault divorce laws literally did, as they meant that the marriage contract was no longer a contract) was that they hate normal people.

The members of the working class who do the best and hold their marriages together end up pissing away all of their savings putting their kids into this college system, yet another load of utopian nonsense weaponized against them. The college does not pay off, and the kids end up remaining dependents deep into adulthood, and of course the grandparents then end up managing the latest round of sex and drug drama.

The other issue was of course obesity, which is also a result of government malfeasance. The government regulates virtually everything in this country, and yet refuses to regulate the food industry, allowing multinational corporations to sell people addictive, dangerous, chemical laden garbage that is effectively “fake food.” And of course, putting women in the workplace meant that women don’t have the time to cook real food, so so much of what people eat comes out of boxes, or from fast food drive throughs.

I of course agree with the universal consensus that the middle class should be the core of society. However, when you allow the working class to devolve into a disastrous mess of poverty, divorce and drug addiction, that is always going to bleed over into the middle class. And the single easiest thing for any society to do is ensure that simple people who just want to work, have a house, and drive a truck are able to do that without their lives being destroyed by child support payments and drugs. Literally, all you have to do for these people to keep them happy is not purposefully sabotage them with weaponized utopianism.