Injecting children with these drugs permanently sterilizes them, not to mention completely destroys their life and raises their risk of suicide by 50 times.

The government and the media are encouraging this.

It’s almost like they want to hurt us.

The Sunday Times:

The BBC is pushing the boundaries of children’s television by broadcasting a drama about a 12-year-old transgender girl’s move to secondary school.

First Day, which launched on CBBC this week, stars the transgender actress Evie MacDonald as Hannah Bradford, who tries to relaunch her life after being targeted by bullies at primary school.

Charities praised the show as groundbreaking for representing the lives of transgender children but some campaign groups accused the BBC of broadcasting “propaganda”, saying that the series could leave young viewers confused.

The BBC purchased the four-part series from Australia, where it was first broadcast on the ABC this year.

Hannah finds acceptance with a group of friends at her new school but is targeted by a girl who knew her as a boy at primary school.

She is banned from using the girls’ toilets and is unable to attend a friend’s sleepover because the host does not yet know she is transgender, but ultimately shakes off her bully and finds pride in her identity.

Stonewall, the LGBT charity, said it was “thrilled” that First Day was being broadcast in the UK as “representation is so important”.

However other lobby groups which believe that biological sex is observed at birth, not assigned, expressed concerns.

Kate Harris, of the LGB Alliance, said: “It takes a fundamentally one-sided approach to a really complex issue. It’s asking children to accept that a boy who feels like a girl is in fact a girl.

“The way it’s presented is that anybody who doesn’t accept that Hannah is a girl must by their very nature be really mean, nasty and discriminatory against someone who belongs to a vulnerable minority.”

…Navigating the fractious debate between trans rights activists and campaigners who are concerned about gender reassignment being promoted to children is proving difficult for the BBC.

The corporation dropped leading transgender charities from its Advice Line for viewers last month, saying that questions relating to transgender issues and children were “increasingly contested” and the BBC needed to remain impartial.

In 2019 the BBC was criticised over an educational film aimed at children aged 9-12 which claimed that there are more than 100 gender identities. The clip is still live on the BBC Teach website.

Broadcasters across the world are seeking to make their children’s output more diverse, reflecting changing social attitudes. The BBC issued an uncharacteristically bullish response to recent viewer complaints about a lesbian kiss on the Canadian teenage drama The Next Step, insisting that it had a mission to make sure that every child “feels like they belong”.

Disney now has its first ever bisexual lead character, after the creator of the animated series The Owl House confirmed this week that its 14-year-old protagonist, Luz Noceda, is attracted to both sexes. Disney also included a gay storyline in its drama Andi Mack, which is aimed at viewers aged 6–14.

Why is no one trying to stop them from doing this to our children?

Because opposing people who are openly trying to crush the souls of children is “hate”?

Our society is okay with this premise?

“Are you looking for love in your life?”

You thought state-enforced homosexuality was a joke, didn’t you?

It is, but the joke’s on you.

Daily Mail:

A transgender woman says she is a victim of ‘transphobic’ discrimination after being snubbed for a job as a female porn star – because she still has a penis.

Ria Cooper, 25, who became Britain’s youngest trans person when she transitioned 10 years ago, had decided to embark on a career in porn when a photographer messaged her asking if she wanted to have sex with him for a film.

But when the photographer heard Ria still had a penis he refused to work with her, bluntly proclaiming he couldn’t do so because she ‘has a c***’.

Ria has hit out at the ‘transphobic behaviour’ and says she’s being unfairly discriminated against in her pursuit of a modelling career.

Do you hear that?

If you perk your ears a little, you can literally hear civilization crumbling and collapsing into the Talmudic abyss.

Ria, from Hull, East Yorkshire, has reported the comments to Humberside Police, which is investigating the incident as a hate crime.

She says the man got in touch with her over WhatsApp after she released her new glamour modelling portfolio online.

One thousand years from now, Chinese historians are gonna consider Hitler’s decision to not kill the Britcucks at Dunkirk the single most catastrophic event in the history of the world.

After they exchanged several messages, the photographer then told Ria he had just been informed by a friend that she is transgender, before saying he wouldn’t work with her because ‘Playboy won’t accept that’.

After making the discovery the man cut all contact with Ria, who says her social media profiles clearly state she is a ‘ladyboy’.

She thought the photographer knew what he was doing.

Ria has described the comments as ‘discriminatory’ and ‘appalling’, comparing the abuse to that of a racist.

Mindless hatred everywhere for no reason.

Good thing there’s always (((someone))) there to subvert your government, media and educational system in order to (((enlighten))) you.

Describing her reaction at the initial message, she said: ‘I didn’t think it was a very professional way for a photographer to act but I am looking to pursue a career in porn so I was open to it.

‘Then all of a sudden he started backtracking but I don’t understand why because it’s clearly written on my page that I’m a ‘ladyboy’.

…

‘The way he spoke to me after that was absolutely disgusting, no one should be discriminated against for their lifestyle choice.’

Humberside Police has confirmed officers are currently investigating the allegation.

A spokesman for the force said: ‘We received a report of a hate incident yesterday, on Wednesday, October 16. The report has been logged and will be investigated.’

Of course it’ll be investigated, why wouldn’t it be?

Aren’t you goyim happy you’re not speaking German?

Cuz that would’ve been the worst thing ever.

I don’t think anything really hammers home just how dystopian the situation is more than these forced child tranny stories.

State-enforced homosexuality might not come around until 2070, in terms of the government forcing adult men to engage in sodomy with one another.

But state-enforced child transgenderism is already here.

And it is enabled, of course, by these horrendous creatures known as White single moms.

The Federalist:

Six-year-old James is caught in a gender identity nightmare. Under his mom’s care in Dallas, Texas, James obediently lives as a trans girl named “Luna.” But given the choice when he’s with dad, he’s all boy — his sex at birth.

In their divorce proceedings, the mother has charged the father with child abuse for not affirming James as transgender, has sought restraining orders against him, and is seeking to terminate his parental rights.

She is also seeking to require him to pay for the child’s visits to a transgender-affirming therapist and transgender medical alterations, which may include hormonal sterilization starting at age eight.

…

When his mother, a pediatrician, took James for counseling, she chose a gender transition therapist who diagnosed him with gender dysphoria, a mental conflict between physical sex and perceived gender. James’ precious young life hinges purely on the diagnosis of gender dysphoria by a therapist who wraps herself in rainbow colors, affirms the diagnosis of gender dysphoria, and dismisses evidence to the contrary. Remove the “rainbow” from James’ diagnosis, and it crumbles under the weight of the criteria for the diagnosis of gender dysphoria.

Pics of the mother are floating around:

She works with other peoples kids… yeah, this woman is a monster, no doubt.

And it was of course a Jewish therapist who enabled the abuse with her “diagnosis” of transgenderism.

Where. Is. The. Father?

Meanwhile, Dad isn’t seeing signs of gender dysphoria. In the father’s home, James appears to be a normal boy and doesn’t identify as a girl. He has a choice of boy’s or girl’s clothes there, and he chooses to dress as a boy. The fact that James changes gender identity depending on which parent is present makes the diagnosis of gender dysphoria both dubious and harmful.

The transition therapist has observed that James is not consistent, insistent, or persistent in the desire to become “Luna.” For example, a dossier filed with the Dallas court says that, under the skilled eyes of the therapist, the child was presented two pieces of paper, one with the word “James” and one with the word “Luna,” and asked to pick the name he preferred. When the appointment only included his mother, James selected Luna, the name and gender he uses at his mother’s home and in his first-grade classroom. When the appointment was only with his father, however, James pointed to the boy name James, not the girl name.

When James is away from his mother, he consistently rejects the idea that he is “Luna girl” or that he wants to be a girl. Because the court prohibits dad from dressing James as a boy or from teaching him that he is a boy by sharing religious or science-based teachings on sexuality, dad presents James with male and female clothing options and James always chooses, even insists on, his boy clothes. Dad told me, “James violently refuses to wear girl’s clothes at my home.” This is not a sign of gender dysphoria.

Eyewitness accounts from friends corroborate dad’s observations of James preferring to be a boy. Bill Lovell, the senior pastor of Christ Church Carrollton, wrote: “Based on the three occasions I’ve spent time with him, I’d say he acts and looks unmistakably like a healthy six-year-old boy. … I am praying for James, an average six-year-old boy, a sweet-natured, intelligent, lovable and at this point particularly vulnerable young man, caught up in a titanic clash of worldviews.” 

Pray harder, priest.

You don’t even condemn this Satanic evil happening right under your nose. Nothing about that statement indicates to me skin in the game or anything approaching righteous condemnation.

Just sad mewling and wringing of hands. 

I suppose we should thank God that the priest sided with the man at all. Nowadays, I half-expect the “priests” to side with the tranny agenda than not in the name of “love” or something equally vague.

And what is this nonsense about courts forbidding the father to tell his son he’s a boy? 

Really sick stuff at work here, lads.

Will normie dads being forced to pay for their young boys’ transition by unhinged thots and Jew-controlled courts be enough to wake people up?

I sure hope so. 

But this is the condition that the White man has been reduced to.

Again to recap: this man’s whore ex-wife is destroying his progeny, clearly out of a desire to take revenge on him (and presumably just a general hatred of men), and the Jewdicial system is helping her. The Church is too poz’d to help this man and the State will force him to pay for the absolutely disgusting elective chemical castration procedure that the mother has planned for his son…

If we aren’t living in some dystopian Talmudic tyranny, I don’t know what else to call this state of affairs.