stanford – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com Daily Stormer Historical Archive Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.17 https://www.anglinarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/cropped-favicon-32x32.png stanford – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com 32 32 Woman Faces Charges After Lying About Male Coworker Raping Her https://www.anglinarchive.com/2023/03/16/woman-faces-charges-after-lying-about-male-coworker-raping-her/ Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0000

Gries first rape hoax was on August 9, 2022.

She told a mandatory reporter (likely a healthcare professional) that she was dragged from a parking lot into a bathroom and raped by a tall black man — who she claimed she had seen on campus before. pic.twitter.com/9XICgha06a

— Maxwell Meyer (@mualphaxi) March 16, 2023

It’s always great to see women getting what they deserve.

It’s very rare that a woman ever even gets charged with a rape hoax. Women simply do not face consequences in this society. Ironically, part of feminism is not only that women should have more power, but also that they should face fewer consequences.

Historically, when women did not have so much power, it was thought that they were too stupid and emotionally unstable to be punished on the same level as men for the same crimes. But they would have been punished for a rape hoax, because that is so serious and it is so obviously malicious. Now, however, feminists use arguments like “she only did this criminal act because she was traumatized by the patriarchy.” And men, still having a protection instinct for women – even though they supposedly don’t need protected anymore – will go along with this.

It’s unlikely this woman or any woman will be convicted of a rape hoax and if she is she will most likely get a slap on the wrist. But it’s always interesting to have the concept of “women do hold some responsibility for their actions” enter into society.

Remember Mattress Girl? The court decided she’d invented the rape hoax, and there was never even any discussion of punishing her in any way, because people accepted the idea that “she believe it was a rape” even though it wasn’t.

Serious punishment can, has, and would prevent women from acting this way. It’s just that women don’t really have a conscience (or any concept of objective truth), so when they know there is no punishment, they will do all sorts of things that men would consider to be beyond the pale.

New York Post:

A Stanford employee who claimed she was brutally raped on campus twice by a coworker was charged with lying as part of a revenge scheme that also put some cash in her pockets.

Jennifer Gries, 25, faces felony perjury and other charges for the sham accusations, the Santa Clara District Attorney announced Wednesday.

The Housing Services employee allegedly smeared her coworker because she felt he gave her “false intention” and “turned her friends against her,” according to court documents obtained by The Post.

“Evidence shows that the Gries made up the stories due to being angry at a co-worker,” the DA’s office said in a release.

Gries allegedly told forensic exam nurses in August that an “unknown, late 20s, black male” with a slender build and 6-foot stature attacked her while she was headed to her car inside a campus garage.

“He grabbed both my arms, had me on the ground facing up. He told me not to scream,” Gries told investigators.

Gries said the man forcibly restrained her and took her into a restroom, where he vaginally and anally raped her.

She was cagey with cops after finding out they issued a campus alert about the reported crime but said she knew who her assailant was.

Two months later, Gries reported that the same black man grabbed her arm while she was returning to her office from her lunch break and dragged her to a basement storage closet where he again raped her vaginally and anally.

In both cases, Gries was awarded public money through the California Victim of Crimes Board, the filing shows. It’s not clear how much cash she was eligible for, but applicants can qualify for a maximum of $70,000, program documents show.

Because of the extreme safety risk to the university Gries’ allegations posed, investigators prioritized her rape kits and pushed intense security measures on campus.

But no male DNA was detected on Gries’ kits, the DA said.

…

Gries eventually admitted to lying about the multiple rapes after she was confronted by a detective — and after Standford spent $300,000 in investigating the case and securing the campus.

…

Gries wrote a letter apologizing to her victim, but he said the entire incident has “scarred” him during a time he was caring for his ill mother, who has since passed away.

“This is disgusting. I don’t feel human. I don’t feel human at all,” he reportedly told investigators with tears in his eyes.

Let’s hope she goes to prison.

More importantly, let’s hope a lot of women hear about this case, and rethink their rape hoaxes.

]]> Stanford Blacklists Harmful Words Such as “American,” “Karen,” And “Hip Hip Hooray” https://www.anglinarchive.com/2022/12/21/stanford-blacklists-harmful-words-such-as-american-karen-and-hip-hip-hooray/ Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0000

It’s a boomer sort of talking point at this point, but it’s true: everything about the American system in 2022 is straight out of George Orwell.

It’s really wacky that they are so aggressively just doing all these things that are listed in 1984, including aggressively altering the language.

Breitbart:

Terms and phrases such as “American,” “Karen,” “prisoner,” and even “hip hip hooray,” are “harmful” and should be replaced with more acceptable alternatives, according to Stanford University’s recently exposed index of words to be “eliminated” from use.

The California-based university’s listing of “potentially harmful terms,” originally published in May, drew significant attention this week after seeing widespread exposure on social media.

According to the initiative’s website, the goal of the “multi-phase, multi-year project to address harmful language in IT at Stanford” is to strive to eliminate the “many forms of harmful language, including racist, violent, and biased (e.g., disability bias, ethnic bias, ethnic slurs, gender bias, implicit bias, sexual bias) language in Stanford websites and code.”

It also calls to avoid terms that derive from “colonialism.”

“We encourage you to evaluate the language you use and make changes where you can,” it continues.

The stated purpose of the site, which “focuses on potentially harmful terms” used in the U.S., is “to educate people about the possible impact of the words we use.”

The list of “harmful” terms to be “eliminated” appear in ten distinct categories.

Ableist

Under the “ableist” category of “harmful terms” which further the “belief that people who live with disabilities are abnormal,” Stanford recommends to “consider using” alternatives such as “person with a substance use disorder” instead of “addict,” “masked study” instead of “blind study,” “died by suicide” instead of “committed suicide,” “detail-oriented” instead of “OCD,” and “quick meeting” instead of “stand up meeting.”

Ageist

Under the “ageist” category of language which “singles out a person based on their age instead of their qualifications,” the Stanford list suggests using the person’s name instead of “gray beard,” and “person suffering from senility” instead of the term “senile.”

Culturally Appropriative

“Culturally appropriative” language that “misuses terms that hold meaning to a particular culture in a way that often lacks respect or appreciation” is also to be avoided.

The guide calls to completely desist from the noun “Brave” because it “perpetuates the stereotype of the ‘noble courageous savage,’ equating the Indigenous male as being less than a man.”

Other “offensive” terms and phrases to be avoided include: “bury the hatchet,” “chief,” “guru,” and even “tribe.”

Gender-Based

“Gender-based” terms, which are deemed “not helpful, and, in many cases, are exclusionary,” include the woke “‘preferred’ pronouns” instead of just “pronouns,” given that adding “preferred” implies that “non-binary gender identity is a choice and a preference.”

Words that reinforce “male-dominated language” include “mankind” which should be replaced with “people, humankind, [or] human beings;” “manmade” which should be replaced with “made by hand;” and “manpower,” to be replaced with terms such as “workforce” or “personnel resources.”

Even the term “seminal,” which refers to something that strongly influences later developments, is considered a reinforcement of “male-dominated language” and should be replaced with “leading” or “groundbreaking” instead.

Imprecise

Terms deemed “imprecise” include: “abort,” which “can unintentionally raise religious/moral concerns over abortion;” and even the use of “American” instead of “U.S. citizen” is deemed offensive in that it insinuates that the United States is “the most important country in the Americas (which is actually made up of 42 countries).”

The term “Hispanic” has roots that “lie in Spain’s colonization of South American countries” and is to be avoided as well.

Interestingly, the guide suggests that the term “Karen” is harmful and should be replaced with the apparently less offensive “demanding or entitled White woman” instead.

The term “oriental” is seen as “pejorative as it racializes people of Asian descent as forever opposite ‘others,’” while “peanut gallery” should also be avoided as it “refers to the cheapest and worst section in theaters where many Black people sat during the Vaudeville era.”

While the term “straight,” as opposed to “heterosexual,” implies that non-heterosexuals are “bent” or not “normal,” the guide also condemns use of the term “thug” instead of “suspect” or “criminal,” because it tends to take on a “racist connotation when used in certain circles.”

Institutionalized Racism

Terms deemed to be forms of “institutionalized racism,” include: “blacklist,” which “assigns negative connotations to the color black, racializing the term,” as well as “brown bag,” and “red team,” due to the fact that “red” is often “used disparagingly to refer to Indigenous peoples.”

The term “whitespace” also appears on the list, for it apparently assigns “value connotations based on color (white = good), an act which is subconsciously racialized.”

Person-First

Examples of “offensive” terms in the “person-first” category, which help to avoid defining people “by just one of their characteristics,” include the use of “convict” instead of “person who is/was incarcerated;” “homeless person” instead of “person without housing;” “immigrant” instead of “person who has immigrated” or “non-citizen;” or “prisoner” instead of “person who is/was incarcerated.”

Violence-themed

The guide also recommends “using non-violent alternatives” to violent language “whenever possible.”

The term “abusive relationship” should be discarded in favor of “relationship with an abusive person” in order to communicate that a person is committing the abuse and not the relationship.

Even the age-old universal idiom, “kill(ing) two birds with one stone,” which implies the accomplishment of two things at once, is deemed an apparent “expression [that] normalizes violence against animals,” as does the expression that there is “more than one way to skin a cat.”

In addition, the expressions to “take a shot at” something or to “take your best shot at” something, also “represent the unnecessary use of the imagery of hurting someone or something.”

Other Terms

Other terms blacklisted by the guide include the common cheer “hip hip hooray,” which Stanford claims “was used by German citizens during the Holocaust as a rallying cry when they would hunt down Jewish citizens living in segregated neighborhoods,” though the cheer originated long before the rise of the Nazi movement; as well as the phrase to “hold down the fort,” because it “stems from settlers and soldiers resisting ‘savages’ when ‘on the warpath.’”

In addition, the guide lists “long time no see” and “no can do” as offensive terms due to the fact that they “originated from stereotypes that mocked non-native English speakers.”

After being publicized this week on social media, the index of taboo terms and phrases was met with outrage and mockery.

“I remember how proud I was when I became a naturalized American citizen. I’m still proud to be an American, and I don’t care that @Stanford disapproves of my using the term,” wrote Stanford University Professor of Medicine Dr. Jay Bhattacharya.

“Stanford disapproves of saying you’re proud to be an American? Whoa,” replied Tesla CEO Elon Musk.

https://twitter.com/Bubblebathgirl/status/1605029838963761152?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1605029838963761152%7Ctwgr%5Ec72651ea907cc5f774b21e8338479d7fb718d7bd%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.breitbart.com%2Fpolitics%2F2022%2F12%2F20%2Fstanford-university-ripped-guide-eliminate-harmful-language-like-american-karen-prisoner%2F

“The academy is beyond saving,” wrote another.

“You thought they were banning just ‘Confederates?’ Nope. Stanford’s new list of naughty words includes ‘American,’” another user wrote.

“American” is a very strange one to ban.

But it is really an obsolete term.

“America” doesn’t even exist anymore. What we have is Analmerica: land of the tranny and home of the child molester.

People fought and died for freedoms, and people now are giving them away for free.

They’re demanding they be taken from them.

]]> Evil Slut Who Hoaxed Rape Charges Against Former Stanford Swimmer Brock Turner Goes Public to Sell Book https://www.anglinarchive.com/2019/09/05/evil-slut-who-hoaxed-rape-charges-against-former-stanford-swimmer-brock-turner-goes-public-to-profit-off-of-book/ Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0000 Lee Rogers
Daily Stormer
September 5, 2019

Chanel Miller is the disgusting Yoda-looking slut who falsely accused Stanford swimmer Brock Turner of rape and had his life ruined. She is now trying to profit from this rape hoax with a book.

A few years ago, Brock Turner, an all-American swimmer for Stanford University, was falsely charged with rape/sexual assault and sent to prison. He was drinking and partying with an intoxicated slut. On their way back to his room to have sex, they stumbled on top of each other where he proceeded to try and finger bang and dry hump the drunk whore near a dumpster.

Two Swedish graduate students of all people came across them. They proceeded to tackle Turner and call police. They did all this despite there being no proof that the whore was passed out and Turner’s insistence that the encounter was consensual.

The stupid Swedes should have just minded their own damn business. (Especially considering they come from a country where Moslem savages are violently raping their women on an almost daily basis. But that’s a whole other subject.)

From there, Turner had his life destroyed. The Jewish media presented him as the new face of rape. His face has literally been included in literature defining the term “rape.”

They even managed to get the sentencing judge in his case recalled because he gave Turner a lighter sentence than they demanded.

Now, this rape hoaxing whore has gone public in the hopes that she can profit from a book. Her name is Chanel Miller. She’s being praised by the Jewish media as a “survivor” even though she is not a “survivor” and was not raped.

She’s been interviewed by CBS News and they’re making a big deal about her upcoming book.

Miller was acting like your typical drunk slut at a college party, but she willfully chose to go along with the rape hoax. She claimed that she couldn’t remember anything, but claimed rape so she could avoid responsibility for behaving like a dumb whore. What happened to Turner was of little consequence to her.

Of course, the mainstream Jewish media is continuing to push the unproven narrative that she was unconscious while absolving her of any responsibility for her actions.

Here’s a small sample of the nonsense that’s being published.

NPR:

In newspapers she was described as the “unconscious intoxicated woman.” In the courtroom she was called Emily Doe. On Tuesday, she let the world know that her real name is Chanel Miller.

In 2015, Miller was attacked while unconscious after drinking too much at a fraternity party at Stanford University. Two young men on bicycles rescued her. Her attacker tried to run away but they chased him and held him down until the police arrived. Brock Turner, her attacker, was a student at Stanford and a swimming champion.

A year later, Turner was tried on and convicted of three counts of sexual assault. At the sentencing hearing, Miller read a powerful and lengthy statement about the effect the assault had on her life. She remembered little of what happened, a fact that was used against her by Turner’s defense attorney. The aftermath was devastating. Addressing Turner directly, she told him that he “took away my worth, my privacy … my confidence, my own voice.”

Miller’s statement went viral. Turner, who could have gotten 14 years in federal prison, was sentenced to six months in county jail. He served three months.

That decision, by Judge Aaron Persky, was met with outrage. Critics assailed Persky for being too lenient. Turner was a first-time offender, promising student and swimming champion. The judge said a tougher sentence “would have had a severe impact on him” — and he did not think Turner was a danger to others. He also pointed out that the victim was intoxicated. He did not mention how her life had been changed by the assault.

Critics of the decision started gathering signatures for a recall campaign. In June 2018, the campaign succeeded. Persky was the first California judge to be recalled in more than 80 years.

And then there’s all these feminist whores on Twitter praising this rape hoaxer as “brave” and “heroic.”

Even the Jew Monica Lewinsky, who is best known for sucking Bill Clinton’s dick in the Oval Office, tweeted her support.

This is one evil bitch we are dealing with. Not only did she destroy Turner’s life by falsely accusing him of rape, but she is now attempting to profit from the incident by going public and selling this stupid book. All because she couldn’t accept responsibility for drinking too much and whoring around at a college party.

She also has an uncanny resemblance to Emma Sulkowicz, the stupid gook-kike cunt who walked around Columbia University carrying a mattress. Sulkowicz, like Miller, falsely claimed that she was raped after having consensual sex with a German student. Her carrying a mattress around like a retard was her way to protest how her rape hoax claims weren’t being taken seriously.

What’s funny is that Anglin actually wrote an article back in 2017, predicting that the bitch hoaxing rape against Turner would be some gook-kike type person like Sulkowicz. Looks like a fairly accurate prediction if we go off of appearances alone.

Chanel Miller is some kind of Yoda-like smooshfaced brown person, with a last name that is the third most common Jewish surname in America.

This whole situation is quite the circus. It clearly illustrates how society has empowered women to make false rape claims against men if they simply regret consensual sexual encounters, or find some way to gain from them. They’ll even be hailed as heroes and invited on national television to sell a book falsely describing how they are a “survivor.” This madness is only going to encourage other women to do similar types of things.

All you men out there need to be really careful when dealing with these devious whores. It’s no joke. It just takes one crazy bitch who regrets having sex with you and your entire life can be ruined.

]]> Science: Researchers Develop Meme Creation AI System https://www.anglinarchive.com/2018/06/19/science-researchers-develop-meme-creation-ai-system/ Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0000 Adrian Sol
Daily Stormer
June 19, 2018

The future of meming is now.

Most science these days is done to push harmful agendas like global warming or invent new niggertech to entertain the bugman masses. But once in a while, somehow, these four-eyes come up with something that truly advances the human condition.

While the most valuable commodity in human society used to be oil, this has long been replaced with something even more fundamental to human welfare: memes.

As such, the automation of meme production is going to trigger a fourth industrial revolution, which will propel our race into a glorious new future.

Motherboard:

Artificial intelligence can do some remarkable things, from driving cars to improving breast cancer diagnosis. And now it can make memes.

Okay, so it’s shitty memes. But you gotta start somewhere. Probably better than my first memes – but don’t tell anybody.

Abel Peirson and Meltem Tolunay, two researchers at Stanford University, recently posted a paper to the arXiv preprint server detailing a new machine learning model they created that’s capable of creating pretty convincing memes:

All that processing power, and they could only make them 300p. Sad.

Peirson and Tolunay trained their machine learning algorithm with a dataset of more than 400 types of memes with multiple captions that they pulled from memegenerator.com using a Python script. To simplify the task, they focused only on “advice animal” style memes, the kind where an image of a specific character like “socially awkward penguin” is overlaid with a caption of text that represents the traits of that character, usually with a humorous observation.

They had to use normie memes to keep things simple. Alt-Right memes are way too big-brained for a basic AI system to handle.

After a few hardware revisions, the AI might be able to come up with good virgin v. chad memes.

“This allows for relatively simple collection of datasets,” the researchers wrote. “In this paper, we specifically refer to meme generation as the task of generating a humorous caption in a manner that is relevant to the initially provided image, which can be a meme template or otherwise.”

Yeah, that’s the basic bitch meme technology. Next, you’ll need to get the AI to combine multiple images together.

And finally, the ability to generate completely new memes from scratch using advanced artistic abilities.

There’s still a long way to go. But the future is looking bright indeed.

After training the algorithm on what kinds of captions go with which images, they were able to test it out by having it generate memes over and over. Some of them didn’t make a lot of sense:

Those pixels… Awful.

But others were pretty solid:

Meh.

The impressive results will start when they start plugging this system straight into /pol/ and begin producing some really dank stuff.

I can only assume that the goal of this research is to provide tools for automated trolling, which is a noble cause. Right now, the biggest bottleneck in the trolling industry is definitely the labor requirements – giving troll engineers the tools to automate their work is sure to cause an explosive growth period in the sector, which is sure to boost the American economy like nothing we’ve ever seen.

Especially exciting is the prospect of implementing this system here at the Daily Stormer. The creation of memes is currently by far the biggest burden on our budget.

It’s estimated that the original Pepe created for this article cost us over 0.732 bitcoin. Donate now – memes don’t come cheap.

Some people might speculate that the left might utilize algorithmic meme generators to finally get their hands on quality material, turning the tide of the internet war in their favor.

Fortunately, this is impossible.

Making funny commie memes is mathematically impossible, and would definitely break any computer that attempts it – like a division by zero.

“Tech support? This is Aaron Goldberg. I tried to get my computer to crank out some anti-Nazi memes, and now smoke is coming out of it. Oy vey!” “Yeah, sir, you can’t do that. That’s not even covered by warranty. Sorry.”

]]>