Jeff Flake already resigned because everyone hates him and he can’t win reelection.

But he hasn’t shut his faggot mouth.

Fox News:

Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., will make a speech scheduled for Wednesday where he will compare President Trump’s concerns of media objectivity to similar comments made by communist dictator Joseph Stalin.

Flake, a fervent critic of the Trump administration, is set to give the speech the same day Trump is expected to announce the winners of the so-called “fake news” awards.

The senator will use his speech to condemn Trump’s attacks on the press and for calling it “the enemy of the American people.”

In the draft of the speech, obtained by The Washington Post, Flake will then compare Trump’s comments to statements made by Stalin, who is responsible for the murder of millions.

“It is a testament to the condition of our democracy that our own president uses words infamously spoken by Josef Stalin to describe his enemies,” the senator is expected to say, according to the excerpts published by the Post.

“It bears noting that so fraught with malice was the phrase ‘enemy of the people,’ that even Nikita Khrushchev forbade its use, telling the Soviet Communist Party that the phrase had been introduced by Stalin for the purpose of ‘annihilating such individuals’ who disagreed with the supreme leader.”

According to the outgoing senator’s speech excerpts, Trump “has it precisely backward — despotism is the enemy of the people,” adding that “When a figure in power reflexively calls any press that doesn’t suit him ‘fake news,’ it is that person who should be the figure of suspicion, not the press.”

…

Flake announced his resignation in October with a scathing attack on the president, calling his behavior “reckless, outrageous, and undignified.”

He also criticized the Republican Party that, in his view, had “given in or given up on the core principles in favor of a more viscerally satisfying anger and resentment,” adding that “anger and resentment are not a governing philosophy.”

Many are asking themselves: what the sam hill is going on with this cocksucker?

Does he really just love Jews this much?

I think the answer is “probably not.”

I don’t think guys like this in the government have any ideology at all, really. They are just yesmen middle manager types.

The deal is that they were told if they played by the rules as had been established under Obama, Bush and Clinton, they would be able to make a lucrative and status-heavy career out of politicking. But then all the sudden Donald Trump showed up and changed the rules, so their entire career path is thrown off course.

He can’t simply climb on-board with Trumpism. Probably for multiple reasons. The most obvious of which is that he doesn’t want to deal with the fallout that comes from taking a hard political position, and furhermore, has no guarantees that Trumpism will last. More importantly, he is bought and paid for by campaign donors that he can’t get square with if he goes along with the Trump agenda.

So he and several other like him have decided to resign.

Jeff Flake is simply lashing out at a person who he views as having ruined his career. It is as simple as that.

The content of his little tantrum is intended to be as emotionally outrageous as possible, and thus in his mind as damaging as possible.

But the idea that Trump can’t criticize a gigantic conspiracy of controlled media and the idea that it is impossible for the people to have enemies is so kooky that this really just plays into Trump’s hands.

Well, it plays into his hands in the sense that it is a snack for his base. Beyond his base, at this point I don’t think anything is going to covert anyone. Other than the economy. If people are getting a lot more money then they had before, the whole “he’s a mean person” thing stops mattering quite so much.

But the country is currently so polarized that I just can’t imagine anything else is going to change that. It’s pretty much us vs. them.

Communism is an ideology that was invented by the Jew Karl Marx (Mordecai Levy), and Jews in general have always been disproportionately represented among its promoters. This is due in large part to the ‘egalitarian’ principles embedded in Marxism: If everyone is to be considered ‘equal,’ then racism and anti-Semitism are inherently anti-Communist attitudes that must be crushed.

In his reply to an inquiry of the Jewish News Agency in the United States in 1931, Joseph Stalin informed the Jewish community that anti-Semitism in Russia, where Communism had triumphed in 1917, was a crime punishable by death.

From the Marxists Internet Archive:

In answer to your inquiry :

National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of cannibalism.

Anti-semitism is of advantage to the exploiters as a lightning conductor that deflects the blows aimed by the working people at capitalism. Anti-semitism is dangerous for the working people as being a false path that leads them off the right road and lands them in the jungle. Hence Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but be irreconcilable, sworn enemies of anti-semitism.

In the U.S.S.R. anti-semitism is punishable with the utmost severity of the law as a phenomenon deeply hostile to the Soviet system. Under U.S.S.R. law active anti-semites are liable to the death penalty.

J. Stalin
January 12, 1931

First published in the newspaper Pravda, No. 329, November 30, 1936

Of course the Jews will to this day lie about their involvement with Communism, and even try and paint themselves as victims of it. They are lying.

Stalin, the orthodox Marxist, did eventually turn on them after World War II, but this was only because the Jews refused to become good ‘Soviet citizens,’ and instead chose to remain largely ethnocentric and Zionist.

That is no way negates their preeminent role in the overthrow of the Czar and countless other Communist revolutions and agitations in Europe. Ultimately, Jewish-led Communism resulted in the murder of tens of millions of White Europeans and caused massive civil unrest, culminating in the outbreak of World War II, which in turn caused the deaths of tens of millions of more Whites and the destruction of Europe.

After the war, and after Stalin let them down, the Jews turned to ‘critical theory,’ aka ‘cultural Marxism,’ the ideology invented by their fellow Jews at the neo-Marxist Frankfurt School, which is now leading to the complete genocide of the entire White race worldwide through mass immigration and political correctness.

Never forgive. Never forget.

Jew media is reporting that a German university has lavished a doctorate upon a hideous 102-year-old Jewess because 77 years ago Nazis allegedly blocked her from sitting her final exam.

Ingeborg Sylmm-Rapoport, who’s almost as old as the Dead Sea Scrolls, was foisted before cameras and flashing bulbs and sadly didn’t suffer any coronary consequences. In this Jew-run media circus she received her PhD from a war-guilt stricken Hamburg University’s teaching hospital, The Age reports.

Purportedly a “pediatric expert”, the withered old Jew crone, who’s being kept alive by witchcraft, now has the exalted but useless doctorate. Apparently, Uwe Koch-Gromus, the SJW dean of the hospital learned of ‘Dr’ Sylmm-Rapoport’s’ case on her 100^th birthday. Compelled by Holohoax-guilt, he set the wheels in motion for a symbolic show of what amounts to an act of forgiveness-seeking for something that didn’t even happen.

The story goes that this Christ-killing whore completed her thesis on diphtheria back in 1938 when the door bust open on the exam room and the Schutzstaffel marched up to her. Having herded her inside the university’s crematorium, the cackling SS officers then danced the traditional German knee-slapping dance upon her ashes before rushing off to find more kikes to ignite. So she never did get that final tick of academic approval.

Who’d have thunk that 77 years later this historic injustice would be righted at probably the exact time she’s about to float off to the great kosher oven in the sky.

Fully chuffed for making reparations for the past evil deeds of his country Koch-Gromus rejoiced after her exam that the ancient Hebrew hag was “simply brilliant.” He gushed, “We were impressed by her intellectual alertness and speechless over her expert knowledge, even in the area of modern medicine.”

Last month this crafty old fraudster told Germany’s Tagesspiegel that “It was about the principle, not about me.”

All of this might’ve been avoided if it wasn’t for Hitler’s regime, which barred her from sitting her oral exam. Back in 1938, her professor at Hamburg’s ‘Israelite Hospital’ (yep) had issued her with a certificate that served to validate her in lieu of the racially discriminatory laws that forbade her from messing with babies.

According to the article, in the run-up to her belated exam, “friends researched developments in diphtheria over the last eight decades for her.” Gee, you’d imagine all her friends would be coke-stains on the inside of Auschwitz’s chimney stack by now, but hey!

Now she has the illustrious honor of “probably” being the oldest person in the world to have received a doctorate, says the hospital’s media huckster.

Getting back to the guilt narrative, the university’s medical director and chairman, Burkhard Goeke, humbly spoke of being able to restore “a piece of justice.”

He issued a tear-soaked statement in which he lamented, “We can’t make the injustice that occurred undone, but our insights into the past shape our perspectives for the future.”

However, the whole lie leaps out like a jack-in-the-box at the admission that this dishonest old bagel-dog had “immigrated” to the US back in 1938 where she got married and continued her career in paediatrics. So she didn’t suffer a damned thing, but the unspeakable horror of having to spend two years studying in Philadelphia for her official PhD.

Oh, and this bit shouldn’t surprise anyone. Having made it to the land of the free, her and the hubby with their four little Jew rat children then relocated to communist East Germany in the early 1950s. This wretched victim of Nazi oppression, who wound up in an enviable situation in America, being a dirty communist, chose to head back and lap up life under the Stalinist regime where she prospered in her chosen profession. In 1969, she  assumed the first neonatology professorship at the prestigious Charite university hospital in Berlin. So what, for the love of Freda, is this doctorate for? That’s a rhetorical question by the way, readers. Her story is clearly one of privilege and choice.

It’s more than likely that Steven Spielberg already has the rights to this damning saga. Once this weepy tragedy hits screens all over the world, it will have been tweaked sufficiently in the propaganda department, so that the next generation of Germans will be obliged to compensate the next generation of Jews.

Indeed, the Nazis might all be dead, but the lie lives on forever, and ever, and ever…

Unlike the Jewish Holohoax, where there is zero physical evidence proving that 6 trillion Jews were gassed to death in shower rooms, turned into soap or made into lampshades – there is plenty of physical evidence proving Josef Stalin’s reign of terror.

The fact that scientists have found a mass grave containing up to 1,000 victims of Stalin is not much of a surprise.  Millions died in Stalin’s infamous Gulag prison system from the 1930s into the 1950s.

The NKVD, which over saw this killing operation, was infested with Jews just like the Bolsheviks who came to power in 1917 via the Bolshevik Revolution.

In 2006, Ynetnews an Israeli news source ran an article detailing how Jews played a prominent role in the NKVD.

Considering this, is it any wonder that the Jewish run media usually tries to avoid discussing Stalin’s numerous crimes against humanity?  Instead, they constantly lie to us about Adolf Hitler and the German National Socialists being the most evil people to ever live.

How many Jewish financed Hollywood films do you see Hitler depicted as the bad guy versus Stalin?  Clearly, Hitler has been shown as the bad guy many more times.

National Post:

Polish and Ukrainian scientists have unearthed a mass grave containing up to 1,000 victims of Stalinist terror in a castle once used as a secret police prison.

Among the victims in the grave were Polish soldiers. The Polish press has already called the find a “new Katyn” in reference to a massacre of thousands of Poles by Stalin in 1940, which still clouds Polish-Russian relations.

The grave was found in the grounds of the Kazimierz the Great castle in the town of Volodymyr-Volynsky in western Ukraine, close to the Polish border.

Although the 11th-century castle served as a base for Stalin’s infamous NKVD from 1939-56, scientists say the victims were killed between 1940 and 1941.

In 1933, the Holodomor was playing out in Ukraine.

After the “kulaks,” the independent farmers, had been liquidated in the forced collectivization of Soviet agriculture, a genocidal famine was imposed on Ukraine through seizure of her food production.

Estimates of the dead range from two to nine million souls.

Walter Duranty of the New York Times, who called reports of the famine “malignant propaganda,” won a Pulitzer for his mendacity.

In November 1933, during the Holodomor, the greatest liberal of them all, FDR, invited Foreign Minister Maxim Litvinov to receive official U.S. recognition of his master Stalin’s murderous regime.

On August 1, 1991, just four months before Ukraine declared its independence of Russia, George H. W. Bush warned Kiev’s legislature:

“Americans will not support those who seek independence in order to replace a far-off tyranny with a local despotism. They will not aid those who promote a suicidal nationalism based upon ethnic hatred.”

In short, Ukraine’s independence was never part of America’s agenda. From 1933 to 1991, it was never a U.S. vital interest. Bush I was against it.

When then did this issue of whose flag flies over Donetsk or Crimea become so crucial that we would arm Ukrainians to fight Russian-backed rebels and consider giving a NATO war guarantee to Kiev, potentially bringing us to war with a nuclear-armed Russia?

From FDR on, U.S. presidents have felt that America could not remain isolated from the rulers of the world’s largest nation.

Ike invited Khrushchev to tour the USA after he had drowned the Hungarian Revolution in blood. After Khrushchev put missiles in Cuba, JFK was soon calling for a new detente at American University.

Within weeks of Warsaw Pact armies crushing the Prague Spring in August 1968, LBJ was seeking a summit with Premier Alexei Kosygin.

After excoriating Moscow for the downing of KAL 007 in 1983, that old Cold Warrior Ronald Reagan was fishing for a summit meeting.

The point: Every president from FDR through George H. W. Bush, even after collisions with Moscow far more serious than this clash over Ukraine, sought to re-engage the men in the Kremlin.

Whatever we thought of the Soviet dictators who blockaded Berlin, enslaved Eastern Europe, put rockets in Cuba and armed Arabs to attack Israel, Ike, JFK, LBJ, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan and Bush 1 all sought to engage Russia’s rulers.

Avoidance of a catastrophic war demanded engagement.

How then can we explain the clamor of today’s U.S. foreign policy elite to confront, isolate, and cripple Russia, and make of Putin a moral and political leper with whom honorable statesmen can never deal?

What has Putin done to rival the forced famine in Ukraine that starved to death millions, the slaughter of the Hungarian rebels or the Warsaw Pact’s crushing of Czechoslovakia?

In Ukraine, Putin responded to a U.S.-backed coup, which ousted a democratically elected political ally of Russia, with a bloodless seizure of the pro-Russian Crimea where Moscow has berthed its Black Sea fleet since the 18th century. This is routine Big Power geopolitics.

And though Putin put an army on Ukraine’s border, he did not order it to invade or occupy Luhansk or Donetsk. Does this really look like a drive to reassemble either the Russian Empire of the Romanovs or the Soviet Empire of Stalin that reached to the Elbe?

As for the downing of the Malaysian airliner, Putin did not order that. Sen. John Cornyn says U.S. intelligence has not yet provided any “smoking gun” that ties the missile-firing to Russia.

Intel intercepts seem to indicate that Ukrainian rebels thought they had hit an Antonov military transport plane.

Yet, today, the leading foreign policy voice of the Republican Party, Sen. John McCain, calls Obama’s White House “cowardly” for not arming the Ukrainians to fight the Russian-backed separatists.

But suppose Putin responded to the arrival of U.S. weapons in Kiev by occupying Eastern Ukraine. What would we do then?

John Bolton has the answer: Bring Ukraine into NATO.

Translation: The U.S. and NATO should go to war with Russia, if necessary, over Luhansk, Donetsk and Crimea, though no U.S. president has ever thought Ukraine itself was worth a war with Russia.

What motivates Putin seems simple and understandable. He wants the respect due a world power. He sees himself as protector of the Russians left behind in his “near abroad.” He relishes playing Big Power politics. History is full of such men.

He allows U.S. overflights to Afghanistan, cooperates in the P5+1 on Iran, helped us rid Syria of chemical weapons, launches our astronauts into orbit, collaborates in the war on terror and disagrees on Crimea and Syria.

But what motivates those on our side who seek every opportunity to restart the Cold War?

Is it not a desperate desire to appear once again Churchillian, once again heroic, once again relevant, as they saw themselves in the Cold War that ended so long ago?

Who is the real problem here?

You just can’t make this stuff up.

Communists in Russia were outraged when their leader showed up to honor mass murderer Joseph Stalin in an Adidas track suit. Not because it would classless to wear a track suit to a memorial, but because Adidas is a symbol of “capitalist swank.”

The article doesn’t even mention that Addidas founder Adi Dassler and his brother were both members of the Nazi party and their family shoe company made boots for the German army during WWII. After the war, the Dassler Brothers shoe company split because the two brother hated each other. Many western German clothing company owners, such as the famous Hugo Boss, had their companies taken away by the Americans. Both brothers apparently accused each other of being bigger supporters of the Nazis. However, both were allowed to continue making shoes, possibly because of influential American friends. Adi started Adidas and his older brother Benjamin started Puma.

From English Language Moscow Times Website…

Russian Communist Party leader Gennady Zyuganov caused a stir on the Russian blogosphere for laying flowers at the grave of Soviet dictator Josef Stalin while wearing an Adidas tracksuit jacket.

A Twitter user who registered under the name “Josef Stalin” quipped: “Zyuganov showed up in an Adidas tracksuit top, a white shirt and dress shoes. [I’d have had him] shot for this outfit!”

Zyuganov made the dress code blunder on Sunday at a ceremony on Red Square to mark the 92nd anniversary of the establishment of the pioneers, a Soviet-era Communist youth organization.

He told the Russian News Service radio station that he wore it because “nobody makes good tracksuits yet in our country.” He did not specify why he had to wear a tracksuit jacket at all, but perhaps it was its red color that made the Communist leader warm to the garb.

His gaffe may have caught people’s attention because Adidas goods symbolized capitalist swank for many Soviet people under the Communist regime.

Zyuganov said that the German firm now makes uniforms for the Communist Party’s football team, however.

“I was wearing our team’s uniform,” Zyuganov was quoted as saying.
“They buy what is available in stores. I don’t have any [advertising] agreements with Adidas,” he added, according to Russian News Service.

Some users of Russian social networks suggested that instead of a bow to the capitalism, the political system that won the Cold War, Zyuganov’s dress choice was a sign of solidarity with another Communist regime.

“Calm down: This is [made in] China,” a Twitter user said.

It is the Ides of March, and it is Purim, and now comes the vote for the reunification of Crimea with Mother Russia.

The Ides of March are when Julius Caesar was murdered by Brutus 2058 years ago.  It was a date of many Roman holidays, which involved ritual animal sacrifice, and included the start of a festival for Attis, who killed himself by cutting off his own penis.

According to Plutarch, Caesar was warned by a seer that he would die before the Ides.

Four years later, on March 15, 40 BC, Octavian (Caesar Augustus) executed 300 Senators and Knights as a ritual sacrifice before an alter of the newly deified Julius.

Then you have Purim.  This is a celebration of the massacre of 75,000 non-Jews, as is recorded in the pseduo-Biblical Book of Ester.

This year, Purim begins on the evening of Saturday the 15th, and ends on the evening of Sunday the 16th.

Rev. Ted Pike tells us:

Every book in the Bible condemns the violent racism of modern Zionism… except one: the book of Esther. The source of the annual feast of Purim, Esther celebrates the Jews’ slaughter of more than 75,000 Gentiles (which included women and children). No Biblical book has so influenced evangelical attitudes toward Israel, especially in approving Israel’s brutality against Arabs. Esther thus plays a pivotal role for both Jews and Christians in their unconditional defense of the state of Israel.

For nearly 2,000 years, a minority of Christian scholars have been troubled by the book’s omission of anything truly spiritual. Athanasius, some of the church fathers, and Martin Luther rejected it as apocryphal. The book never mentions God; nor do its protagonists, Esther and Mordecai. The Jewish people are delivered from annihilation yet never resort to prayer or thanking God afterward.

Instead, this book exalts and appeals to racist Jewish tribalism and appetite for revenge. It began the now familiar Zionist theme: long-suffering Jews as victims of irrational hatred from murderous Gentiles. It celebrates the triumph of Jews who obtain peace not by faith in God but by slaughter.

Ancient as it is, Esther’s message is current. It echoes the cries of Jewish protesters in Israel last month who shouted, “Kill Arabs! Kill those who want to destroy Israel! Kill them before they kill us! “

Traditionally, this festival involved a human sacrifice to the Satanic gods of Judaism.  A Christian boy’s blood was drained and the blood used to cook cannibal matzo treats for the celebration.

I am certain that many Jews still engage in this practice today.

Judaism 101 gives us a creepy-crawly explanation of modern instances of the Purim festival, which they celebrate along with Haman’s fall:

The Pesach (Passover) seder reminds us that in every generation, there are those who rise up to destroy us, but G-d saves us from their hand. In the time of the Book of Esther, Haman was the one who tried to destroy us. In modern times, there have been two significant figures who have threatened the Jewish people, and there are echoes of Purim in their stories.

Many have noted the echoes of Purim in the Nuremberg war crime trials. In the Book of Esther, Haman’s ten sons were hanged (Esther 9:13); in 1946, ten of Hitler’s top associates were put to death by hanging for their war crimes (including the crime of murdering 6 million Jews). An 11th associate of Hitler, Hermann Göring, committed suicide the night before the execution, a parallel to the suicide of Haman’s daughter recorded in the Talmud (Megillah 16a). There are rumors that Göring was a transvestite, making that an even more accurate parallel. One of the men seems to have been aware of the parallel: on the way to the gallows, Julius Streicher shouted “Purim Fest 1946!” See: The Execution of Nazi War Criminals. It is also interesting that, in the traditional text of the Megillah (Book of Esther), in the list of the names of Haman’s sons, the letters Tav in the first name, Shin in the seventh name and Zayin in the tenth name are written in smaller letters than the rest. The numerical value of Tav-Shin-Zayin is 707, and these ten men were hanged in the Jewish year 5707 (the thousands digit is routinely skipped when writing Jewish years; there are no numerals for thousands in Hebrew numbering). They were not hanged on Purim, though — they were hanged on Hoshanah Rabbah.

Another echo of Purim is found in the Soviet Union a few years later. In early 1953, Stalin was planning to deport most of the Jews in the Soviet Union to Siberia, but just before his plans came to fruition, he suffered a stroke and died a few days later. He suffered that stroke on the night of March 1, 1953: the night after Purim (note: Jewish days end at sunset; you will see March 1 on the calendar as Purim). The plan to deport Jews was not carried out.

A story is told in Chabad (Lubavitcher Chasidic Judaism) of that 1953 Purim: the Lubavitcher Rebbe led a Purim gathering and was asked to give a blessing for the Jews of the Soviet Union, who were known to be in great danger. The Rebbe instead told a cryptic story about a man who was voting in the Soviet Union and heard people cheering for the candidate, “Hoorah! Hoorah!” The man did not want to cheer, but was afraid to not cheer, so he said “hoorah,” but in his heart, he meant it in Hebrew: hu ra, which means, “he is evil”! The crowd at the Rebbe’s 1953 gathering began chanting “hu ra!” regarding Stalin, and that night, Stalin suffered the stroke that lead to his death a few days later.

Jews have several times implied that they murdered Stalin.  You can see here that this is hinted at, though it is implied they did it with their magical powers.

Along with the human sacrifice, there is also the idea of a kind of symbolic sacrifice, making it very interesting that the Jews who masterminded the Ukrainian coup seem to be peacefully allowing Crimea to secede.  Though this is probably entirely coincidental, I have no doubt that many a rabbi is viewing this in terms of the sick religion of Judaism.

I will go ahead and predict that someone is going to die tonight in the Ukraine.  It could just be a few more assassinations by the Jew-run “Right Sector” fake Nazis (they killed two people yesterday in the lead up to Purim), or it could be someone more important.

But there will be blood.  The beast demands it.

The former Soviet state of Ukraine and members of the Ukrainian diaspora around the world have been remembering one of the darkest times in the country’s history when millions of their forebears were starved to death under the iron rule of Joseph Stalin.

Eighty years ago (1932-33), when Ukraine was under USSR rule, millions of ordinary Ukrainians perished mostly from starvation as a result of the liquidation of private property and industrialisation. It became known as “Holodomor”, or “execution by hunger”.

Stalin decreed that Ukrainian peasants must join collective farms and that their harvests would be confiscated by Soviet authorities. Bolshevik forces swept through villages taking food and carrying out mass executions. Anyone caught stealing food or trying to leave the region in search of bread was either imprisoned, turned back or executed.

Many Ukrainians survived by eating bread made from weeds and grass, and there were documented accounts of cannibalism.

Read More

Yet another great find from The Black Rabbit of Inlé, about a meeting called by the United Jewish Committee in London on November 5, 1942, the eve of the 25th anniversary of the Bolshevik revolution – where Chief Rabbi Hertz praised the Soviet Union for outlawing anti-Semitism, and Israel M. Sieff stated that Bolshevism was based on ancient Jewish moral values.

Stalin wrote in 1931:

In the U.S.S.R. anti-semitism is punishable with the utmost severity of the law as a phenomenon deeply hostile to the Soviet system. Under U.S.S.R. law active anti-semites are liable to the death penalty.

Molotov (who had a Jewish wife), also said:

In the Soviet Union actual anti-Semites are shot.

Trotsky the Jew said in 1918:

The very first order of the Bolshevist government was that pogrom makers shall be shot down on the spot without trial.

Chief Rabbi Hertz also claimed, by the way, that evil Nazis played football with the corpses of Jewish infants. But on the issue of anti-Semitism being a crime in the Soviet Union, at least, Hertz spoke the truth.