Upon appearing at Crawley Magistrates’ Court last week, Maughan pleaded guilty to the unprovoked attack towards Mohamed Mahroof and security guard Mansoor Bahar in June.

He was sentenced to 12 weeks in prison for the racist rant at a branch in Langley Green, West Sussex.

Melanie Wotton, prosecuting, said: “At about 7pm Maughan went into McDonald’s where Mr Mahroof was working as an assistant manager and Mr Bahar as a security guard.

“Maughan leant over the counter and read Mr Mahroof’s name badge before asking him ‘Are you Mohamed?’ and adding ‘Are you a Muslim’?

“Mr Mahroof responded by saying ‘yes’ and when Maughan asked him again he ignored him.

“Maughan then said ‘I’m Christian, you are a Muslim, do you want to chop off my head’? and he made a gesture across his throat to show a beheading.”

Read More

Maybe if we give up all our rights the “minority” will start to approximate civilized human behavior. This is the bottom level of appeasing the other, after the spending, the special rights, the unearned promotions, the dead White victims, the apologies and groveling. We have too many freedoms and the jew is here to explain why this is a Bad Thing. Welcome to today’s U.S.S.A. A nation founded on the right to dissent and express unpopular opinions now prepares for Speech laws, Thought Crime and Face Crime punishments. The stinking corpse of our dead country releases foul kosher gasses as a hideously ugly jewess attacks our most basic rights in the name of communism, White genocide and the final planned demolition of our homelands. Trust the jew alien, cattle. They know what’s best.

Thought Catologue:

Recent scandals involving right-wing hatemongers like Phil Robertson, Donald Sterling, Bill Maher, and the Sigma Alpha Epsilon fraternity have brought to light one of America’s biggest embarrassments: the fact that America remains the only country in the world without any legal protections against hate speech.

Our embarrassing inherent rights, not like cool and soulful communist tyranny. Give up your freedoms to win the approval of the international jew, goyim. We must prevent Christians from discussing the contents of the Bible, panty-raiding frat boys from being naughty and Bill somebody from doing whatever he did wrong. To confuse the gentile we’ll even throw a wealthy jew into this collection of ungood. He’s already got his shekels, I’m sure he can take it.

In any other country, people like Phil Robertson and Donald Sterling would have been taken before a Human Rights Commission and subsequently fined and/or imprisoned and/or stripped of their right to public comment for making comments that incite hatred and violence against vulnerable minorities.

This is real and not a parody. I know, how can you even tell these days. A jewess advocates for Soviet-style “commissions,” unpeople vanishing, gulags and all those other wonderful things The Light of the World has given us.

But, in the US, such people are allowed to freely incite hatred and violence against vulnerable minorities with impunity, as the US lacks any legal protections against any forms of hate speech – even the most vile and extreme forms of hate speech remain completely legal in the so-called “land of the free.”

I can’t believe we’re not locking people up for words in the so-called “land of the free.” The jew is truly irony-proof.

Not only is this a violation of the most basic and fundamental human rights principles, but it’s also an explicit violation of legally-binding international human rights conventions.

The human right to declare unpopular opinions “hate” and eliminate the thought criminals. Who will define what, exactly, is “hate?” Three guesses, first two don’t count.

As of 2015, the US is the only country in the world where hate speech remains completely legal.

Get with the majority, the Bolsheviks.

This is, in fact, a flagrant violation of international human rights law.

Note the bizarre jew obsession with “international” law. No borders, no nations, no culture or identity. A sea of brown slaves to be ruled over by g*d’s chosen. The jew is always an alien and an outsider, a foreign parasite in whatever country it is found, a satanic evil in human form.

By failing to prosecute hate speech, the US is explicitly and flippantly violating international human rights law. No other country would be allowed to get away with this, so why would the US? The United Nations has stated many times that international law has absolute authority.

The hatred this jewess has for ordinary Whites is palpable.

The US is required to outlaw hate speech.

Well, if a communist one-worlder jew thinks it’s a good idea, that must be the case.

I have always been a major champion of the unalienable right to freedom of speech.

LOL. Again, this is real. It’s not a joke. Let that sink in.

However, like all democratic rights, the right to freedom of speech comes with responsibility, and freedom of speech has to be balanced against other freedoms.

We must balance it against the freedom to insert objects into the rectum, the freedom to think a very narrow grouping of pre-approved kosher opinions, the freedom to quietly die, etc.

In the words of Irwin Cotler, who is perhaps the single most prominent human rights activist in Canada:

“The truth is no defense.”

In all other countries, it’s simply common sense that freedom of speech doesn’t protect hate speech.

It just makes sense that whatever your rulers decide is wrong should be outlawed.

It’s not something that’s even up for debate.

Argue with the secret police and the gulag, Whitey.

Everyone learns in school that hate speech is not free speech, and nobody would ever question this.

Who would ever question the communist indoctrination center and its wonderful lessons?

American society is a deeply racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, patriarchal, Islamophobic, and anti-human rights society.

Citation missing. Back in reality the appeasement and surrender continues, the tolerance and suicidal altruism. We’ve opened our gates to racial enemies and spiritual evil and are now paying a heavy price for this misguided attempt at “justice.” Our big reward is being called names by our executioner.

The American government is a profoundly racist government where, despite the presence of Barack Obama, the vast majority of people with the most power are privileged white men.

The racist government of the United States certainly does not allow minorities to have a voice, as, like all Western governments, the US government is run by privileged white men who, quite frankly, couldn’t care less about the basic human rights of vulnerable minorities.

There’s ordinary dishonesty and then there’s this. Whites don’t even have a word for it, but the jew does. Chutzpah.

There is an endless amount of evidence showing just how deeply-entrenched racism is in the United States government.

I can’t actually produce any and over the last fifty years we’ve seen one tax-payer funded initiative after another directed at helping the “minority,” but I guess we’re never going to get that “Thank you,” not even on our tombstone.

As children, when we say something rude, hateful, or disrespectful, an adult “sets us straight” and punishes us.

You’re a child, goy. The jew-controlled government is your parent and will use the rod of correction to bring you into line.

For an example of the approach that America should seek to emulate, the US should again look towards Australia.

It’s time to stop allowing right-wing bigots and hatemongers to hide behind “freedom of speech.”

We’re so sick of the shkotzim trying to hide behind so-called freedoms.

It’s time to bring the hammer down on hate speech in the US. The time to start doing that is right now.

Who would have thought that one day, loving your own race would see you labelled as worse than a sex offender?

It has been obvious for quite some time now that it is more socially acceptable to be called a rapist than a racist and now the UK government have confirmed this, by seeking to implement the same powers used to prevent perverts from going online, against truth-tellers.

Thanks to the authorities fear of being called ‘racist’ thousands of young White girls have been groomed and then raped by filthy Pakis and Negro beasts and the government’s response is to ban the people that expose this sort of thing from using the internet?

Although it was not Jews raping our children in that instance, it certainly was mainly Jews that were calling the people trying to expose it ‘racists’ and ‘anti-Semites’ and it is also Jews that keep calling for more immigration and stronger laws to silence anyone criticising them.

BBC

Social media users who spread racial hatred should be banned from sites such as Twitter and Facebook, MPs say.

The All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into anti-Semitism wants prosecutors to examine whether prevention orders like those used to restrict sex offenders’ internet access could be used.

The cross-party group also highlighted the use of anti-Semitic terms online.

Last week, a Community Security Trust report said UK anti-Semitic incidents more than doubled to 1,168 in 2014.

The trust – which monitors anti-Semitism in Britain – says this was its highest figure recorded since it began work in 1984.

The Parliamentary inquiry was set up following a rise in incidents in July and August last year during fighting between Gaza and Israel.

Although the primary focus of the inquiry was anti-Semitism, one recommendation it made was that those who carry out any kind of hate crime should be prevented from using social media.

Hate crimes are defined in England and Wales as offences carried against someone because of their disability, gender identity, race, religion or belief or sexual orientation and can include harassment.

The MPs said social media platforms had “increasingly been used for the spread of anti-Semitism”.

Their report said the terms “Hitler” and “Holocaust” were among the top 35 phrases relating to Jews during the conflict.

The hashtags “Hitler” and “genocide” featured with “high frequency”, it added. The “Hitler Was Right” hashtag trended worldwide in July 2014.

Notice the way they slip in a recommendation that anyone who carries out a hate crime should be banned from using the internet, then go on to give the impression that these ‘hate crimes’ are actual physical offenses against people.

Since the Jews took over our justice system it is an offence just to criticise them or any of their chosen pets, such as queers, Moslems, Negroes or Pakis. No longer does there have to be any actual physical harm for an offence to be committed. It is enough for somebody else to think that one of the privileged minority groups MIGHT be offended by a mean word, to convict someone of an offense.

This doubling of ‘anti-Semitic incidents’ is really just an increase in the criticism that these subversive Jews are receiving online and elsewhere, it has nothing at all to do with any physical harm being done to them.

The idea of punishing people and treating them like sex offenders for criticizing the hostile forces which are wrecking our nations is abhorrent, but at the same time it is hugely encouraging to see that they are so terrified of the truth getting out. And it is getting out, for that doubling of anti-Semitic incidents means our people are swelling in numbers and the more these rodents clamp down on free speech like this, the more they expose themselves for what they truly are and the more the general public moves to our side.

Children as young as three are now being persecuted by the state for making innocent statements about race and gender, The Daily Mail reports. Thousands of young children have already been reported for hate crimes to the local education authorities by their zealous cultural Marxist teachers.

The use of common English words such as “girl,” “Chinese,” “Somalian” or “gay” by a White boy will ensure the child is marked down as showing ‘prejudice-related’ behavior.  The practice was supposed to have been stopped by the coalition government, but the keen anti-racist teachers have just carried on doing it anyway.

More than 4,000 pupils were spied on and reported as being hate-criminals in just the 13 council areas looked at, which means nationally thousands of children could be having this mark put on their record, which is then carried on to their next school and possibly held for even longer.

Josie Appleton of the Manifesto Club, a civil liberties group, had this to say about it: “Particularly worrying is the expansion of incident recording and reporting to ever-greater categories of prejudice, which seem limited only by the strange imagination of education officials.  One primary school pupil calling another a girl suddenly becomes a sign of gender image prejudice, subjected to recording requirements more thorough than accompanying most burglaries. A reality check is urgently required.”

Children are born racist, with a love for their own people and a fear of other races. This is quite natural and is there to ensure that the child does not put itself in any unnecessary danger.

Punishing children for this and trying to brainwash them into behaving differently is sick and twisted.  However with a bit of luck, that feeling of righteous indignation a child feels at such an injustice as this will be carried over into when they become an adult.

It did for Craig Bodecker, who then went on to make the film ‘A Conversation about Race.’

In the formerly Christian country of Britain, it used to be that you were free to speak your mind on any subject you saw fit. After all, people were not forced to listen to you, if you did not like what you were hearing, it was expected that you would just walk away, switch the television off or put the book down.

Not so any more however. If there is any chance that someone who is not White may be offended, then you run the risk of being arrested and thrown into jail, as this 19-year-old lad from Leeds has just found out, after he posted a video to a  social media website of him showing his disgust for the Koran, by tearing it apart with his teeth, putting it in the toilet and then burning it.

Yorkshire Standard:

The police arrested the suspect on 27 December after people raised concerns for the safety of the person who had posted the video up following a number of public comments made in response to it.

People also called the police complaining about the offensive nature of the video.

The suspect was arrested from an address in Beeston, Leeds, on suspicion of a racially or religiously aggravated public order offence.

Superintendent Mabs Hussain, of Leeds District Police, said: “Due to the nature of this offence, any decision to charge must be taken by the Director of Public Prosecutions. We are currently preparing an advice file which we will be submitting to the Crown Prosecution Service in due course. In the meantime the arrested man has been released on bail to an alternative location.

“We are aware of strong feelings expressed by a number of people in response to this video. We would again urge people to allow this investigation to run its course and remind members of the public that we will take robust action against anyone who acts outside of the law.”

The Yorkshire Standard was notified by various members of the public about the video.

The site also received links to the video and it had been shared at least over 1,000 times and had over 100 comments – some included death threats.

It was removed from the account a day after the arrest.

The police were contacted by the Yorkshire Standard for a clarification on whether the man did rip the Koran, put it in a toilet and burn it. The police refused to confirm or go into detail. The video was deemed as an offensive video.

So it is fine to immerse crucifixes in urine and photograph it, it is fine to write about Christ boiling in excrement and publish it and it is fine to make a ‘comedy’ program where a Jew urinates on Christ, but the minute you offend any other religion, it is a “racially or religiously aggravated public order offence”?

What kind of a law is that then, that only applies to White Christians?

One of the saddest things about the transformation of Britain into a culturally Marxist hell where words are a crime and gang-raping and trafficking little girls isn’t, is the effect it has on the elderly, who are simply incapable of understanding this brand-new social paradigm.

It seems like every day there is another innocent old man in court for using traditional English words to describe what he sees.

The latest victim of the Jew-created speech-crime laws is Ian MacGregor, who The Express reports has never broken a law before in his life.

For his 71st birthday, the Cameron Regime marched him into a modern-day star chamber and charged him with using the word ‘tink.’

“That’s the tinks got the shed up” MacGregor admitted saying, as his neighbors erected a hut in their back garden. The vindictive gypsy cow then reported him to the Police in the hopes of getting some compensation.

Thankfully the elderly man was not given a jail-term, as has been known to happen before, but the court did ensure that he does now have a criminal record.

After this rude awakening to the reality of living in an occupied country, the former plant operator had this to say: “You can’t say anything nowadays.”

The Conservatives are planning on bringing in new free speech restrictions designed to silence all criticism of their Jewish masters and assorted pets.

They are sneaking these new laws in under the guise of protecting people from ‘extremists’ and are redefining extremist to mean anyone who they decide is ‘spreading hate but not breaking any laws.’

This would mean that people quoting certain parts of the Bible or criticizing gay marriage would be treated the same as if they were members of Boko Haram or ISIS.

The evil plan has been hatched by the arch-feminist Theresa May, and will include ‘Extremism Disruption Orders’ to prevent people posting messages on Facebook or Twitter and from speaking in public.

Anyone seeking to challenge these orders would have to go all the way to the High Court and once there, established facts would not be allowed to be included as evidence.

This means that they can silence whoever they feel like, just by claiming that the person was ‘justifying hatred’ against one of the protected groups of perverts and foreigners.

This unprecedented attack on free speech and the liberty of conscience that Britain always used to be famous for has led to alliances between the most unlikely candidates.

Telegraph:

The National Secular Society and the Christian institute – two organisations with often diametrically opposing interests – said they shared fears that the broad scope of extremism could represent a major threat to free speech.

Keith Porteous Wood, director of the NSS, said secularists might have to think twice before criticising Christianity or Islam. He said secularists risk being branded Islamophobic and racist because of their high profile campaigns against the advance of Sharia law in the UK.

“The Government should have every tool possible to tackle extremism and terrorism, but there is a huge arsenal of laws already in place and a much better case needs to be made for introducing draconian measures such as Extremism Disruption Orders, which are almost unchallengeable and deprive individuals of their liberties,” he said.

“Without precise legislative definitions, deciding what are ‘harmful activities of extremist individuals who spread hate’ is subjective and therefore open to abuse now or by any future authoritarian government.”

Simon Calvert, Deputy Director of the Christian Institute, said traditionalist evangelicals who criticise gay marriage or even argue that all religions are not the same could find themselves accused of extremism.

“Anyone who expresses an opinion that isn’t regarded as totally compliant with the Equality Act could find themselves ranked alongside Anjem Choudary, Islamic state or Boko Haram,” he said.

He added: “How many times a day do intellectually lazy political activists accuse their opponents of ‘spreading hatred’?

“The left does it, the right does it, liberals do it, conservatives do it, it is routine.

“Hand a judge a file of a thousand Twitter postings accusing this atheist or that evangelical of ‘spreading hatred’ and they could easily rule that an EDO is needed.

“It’s a crazy idea – the Conservatives need to drop this like a hot brick.”

A Conservative spokesman said: “Freedom of expression and freedom of speech are a vital part of a democratic society.

“In Government, Conservatives have always tried to strike the right balance on freedom of expression, freedom of assembly, freedom to manifest one’s religion, and the need to protect the public. We have never sought to restrict peaceful protest or free speech, provided it is within the law.

“Our proposal to introduce Extremism Disruption Orders reflects the need to go further on challenging the threat from extremism and those who spread their hateful views so that we can keep that democratic society safe.”

If you do not have the freedom to be offensive and the freedom to take offense, then you do not have freedom at all.

The definition of bigot is to silence another’s opinion and there is nothing more bigoted than using the strong arm of the law to do it.

Canadian patriot and freedom fighter Arthur Topham is to be hauled before the Canadian courts next year on trumped-up charges. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that Arthur is an innocent man. His trial date has now been set. He will appear in court on 26 October, 2015, and his trial will last for two weeks until 6 November.

If found guilty, this man who has said and done nothing that you and I have not said or done a thousand times, will be torn from the embrace of his wife, his family and his friends and be thrown into prison. It will be a major miscarriage of justice if this should occur.

The forthcoming trial of Arthur Topham is therefore much more than the trial of one man. Canadian justice will itself be on trial.

What is Arthur’s alleged crime? Arthur’s only crime is that he is a political dissident who has chosen to exercise his democratic right to free speech. He has spoken out eloquently about the war crimes of the state of Israel and published books on his website which are regarded as offensive to many Jews. To criticize this privileged ethnic group in Canada or to question its cherished assumptions, is, it seems, strictly taboo. This is classified as “hate speech”.

At no time has Arthur advocated breaking the law. He has never incited anyone to violence. He has merely utilized his pen to express his political views in a rational and civilized way as any political dissident anywhere in the world would do.

If Arthur had been an American or British citizen, he would not be facing a possible prison sentence right now, and this is because whatever Arthur has said or done is not regarded as a crime in the United States or Britain.

If Arthur is to be condemned in a Canadian court for “hate speech”, it will only be because Canada has now fallen under the dominant influence of a powerful ethnic group who have somehow managed to turn Canada into an Israelified police state.

Yesterday I receive an email from an old friend of mine. His name is Felix Dean. He is a retired Canadian professional who dearly loves his country, just as Arthur Topham does. Unlike Arthur however, Felix can no longer bear to live in Canada. He feels that Canada has rapidly morphed into a police state under the malign  influence of organized Jewry. So Felix now resides in self-imposed exile within “the civilized confines of Europe,” to quote his own words.

This is what Felix has to say about his Canadian compatriot Arthur Topham:

“To the best of my understanding, Arthur Topham’s  cardinal sin is not what he said, but the fact that he PUBLISHED it. There is an individual by name of Richard Warman, the rabid Zionist attack dog whose only reason for living is to destroy truth tellers like Arthur. Warman is actually of German ancestry, not a Jew as far as I know, but he is a classical cult zombie, someone so thoroughly brainwashed and programmed for bloodshed that I cannot but regard him as little better than a Manchurian candidate of the worst sort.”

Strong words, friend Felix. It distresses me to know that Canadian justice is now apparently relying on the evidence of Manchurian candidates. Has it really come to this?

It would appear that this man Richard Warman(pictured), an ardent Zionist with a reputation for being a “serial complainant”, has a personal grudge against Arthur Topham and would like to see him go to prison.

Though non-Jewish himself and with no official position, Warman is constantly to be seen filing complaints against critics of Big Jewry. It was he who tried to get David Icke into trouble recently, accusing Icke of unspecified “hate crimes”. Apparently mentioning “Jews” in the same breath as “lizards” is deeply disturbing to Mr Warman and could indirectly lead to a second Holocaust.

Needless to say, Warman is relatively small fry: a pest and a nuisance rather than a serious threat to champions of free speech. Arthur’s main adversary is a powerful Canadian Jew, Harry Abrams, British Columbia representative of B’nai B’rith Canada. It was he who in 2007 registered a section 13 complaint against Arthur as follows:

“This concerns  a complaint filed with the Canadian Human Rights Commission seeking relief for discriminatory publication under prohibited grounds caught by  Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act. The premise of this complaint is a contention that Arthur Topham of Quesnel, British Columbia, Canada, and his internet publication known as  Radicalpress.com contrive to promote ongoing hatred affecting persons identifiable as Jews and/or as citizens of Israel.”

Cut out the legal jargon and it boils down to this: Arthur is a criminal because he has given offense to the Jews.

In 2012, Harry Abrams filed a second complaint against Arthur with the British Columbia “Hate Crimes” unit, alleging that:

“Roy Arthur TOPHAM, between the 28th day of April, 2011 and the 4th day of May, 2012, inclusive, at or near Quesnel, in the Province of British Columbia, did by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin, contrary to Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code.”

Impressive legal jargon reducible to the age-old whine: “This man is saying bad things about Jews and must be stopped!”

This is the charge Arthur is now fighting, and this is the question the Canadian courts must decide: is it permissible to contradict a Jew in any way, thereby hurting his feelings, and will you be sent to prison if he complains about you?

A few more quotes from the email of my Canadian friend Felix will help to fill in the picture:

“Arthur had a brave and noble defender in his lawyer, Douglas Christie, who originally defended Ernst Zundel and other political dissidents. Christie unfortunately succumbed to liver cancer a few years ago, a true hero in every sense of the word.

Consider that all these guys are real Canadians, whose ancestors were the original pioneers and frontiersmen of our beloved country. These great Canadians  earned combat medals, they fought and died in wars on behalf of Canada, and then what happens? These troublesome Jews show up and proceed to grind all our Canadian patriots to dust and ashes, as if they owned the world and all the surrounding planets.

No part of Canadian history holds any value for these alien interlopers. They respect none of our traditions. It is thoroughly disgusting.

You and I have said things that are hundreds of times more offensive to “the Jews” than Arthur Topham has, and yet no one is threatening to throw us in prison! So why do they pick on Arthur? It’s because Arthur has made a name for himself (through Christie) in the mainstream press. Ordinary Canadians know all about him and therefore he must be made a very public example of — his head must be paraded through the streets on a spike!

Arthur most certainly needs defending. In fact, I believe his wife is Jewish. Not that this will help him in any way.”

I was deeply moved by this eloquent email from my friend Felix, himself a Canadian citizen, as I say, who has chosen to leave Canada and live abroad because of the takeover of his country by an increasingly obnoxious, in-your-face Jewish minority. This natural aversion to being bossed around by pesky Jews naturally means that Felix is now regarded as an “anti-Semite” — a term which, according to B’nai B’rith Canada, can now be applied to four million Canadians.

It is amazing to think that even a man with a Jewish wife such as Arthur Topham should be regarded as a dangerous anti-Semite by B’nai B’rith Canada.

Consider this sobering fact:  not a SINGLE Canadian citizen has been named as a victim of Arthur Topham’s political activities. Who has complained to the police about Arthur Topham? Only TWO individuals out of 36 million Canadians: one a non-Jewish serial complainant, Richard Warman, already mentioned above, and the other a powerful Jew representing B’nai B’rith Canada, Harry Abrams. It is Harry Abrams who is currently leading the witch hunt against Arthur Topham. 

The glib assumption that B’nai B’rith Canada, spear-headed in the British Columbia region by Jewish commissar Harry Abrams, represents Jewish interests in Canada and speaks for all Canadian Jews, is an assumption that cannot be granted. There is one Jew who certainly does not feel that B’nai B’rith Canada speaks for all Jews, and that is Arthur Topham’s Jewish wife.

I venture to say that Arthur’s Jewish wife is only one among thousands of Jews in Canada who are utterly appalled by the flagrant war crimes committed by the Jewish state in Gaza only quite recently. These Jews do not feel that B’nai B’rith Canada, with its undeviating loyalty to Israel, represents their interests in any way.

For the record, Arthur Topham’s Jewish wife is totally aware of Arthur’s  political activities and is behind her husband 100 percent of the way in whatever he has said or done. Raised in a secular household of Russian Jews, Topham’s wife has no time for Zionism. She is a practicing spiritual healer, with clairvoyant abilities, who uses traditional medicines in her healing ministry. Ever since she was a child, I am told, “she has followed the Red path of the Native American Indians and never could relate to her Jewish background.”

Naturally, Arthur’s Jewish wife does not, unlike B’nai B’rith Canada, regard it as a crime that Arthur should have published The Protocols of the Elders of Zion on his site.

That B’nai B’rith Canada should actually go to the absurd length of suggesting that Arthur Topham should be sent to prison for, among other things, publishing the Protocols on his website—a book that anyone can buy anywhere—is a sure sign of desperation as well as malevolent overkill.

Apart from the Protocols, there are other books Arthur has published on his website which, according to B’nai B’rith Canada, he should not have published and which mark him out as a dangerous criminal who is a threat to Canada’s 375,000 Jews. These are books widely available not only on the internet but in major libraries and specialist bookshops, e.g., Eustace Mullins’ The Biological Jewand Elizabeth Dilling’s The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today.

Elizabeth Dilling’s book, incidentally, happens to be a meticulously researched exposé of the Babylonian Talmud, revealing in quotation after shocking quotation the bizarre mindset of Talmudic Jewry. Here are a few examples of what will be found in the Jews’ holiest book:

(1) “When a Jew murders a gentile, there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a gentile he may keep.

(2) “A Gentile girl who is three years old may be [sexually] violated.”

(3) “If a Jew is tempted to do evil, he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there.”

(4) “Jesus is in hell, being boiled in hot excrement.”

B’nai B’rith Canada is naturally incensed that the official Jewish hatred of non-Jews should be so openly revealed. They would prefer to see their hatred of the non-Jewish majority kept carefully under wraps. It follows that this highly repressive Jewish organization would not only like to see Dilling’s book banned, but they would also like to see Arthur Topham given a stiff prison sentence for daring to draw attention to the book on his website.

The unbelievable chutzpah of B’nai B’rith Canada was perhaps even more flagrantly on display when they raised objections to Arthur Topham’s republication on his site of Theodore N. Kaufman’s hate-filled 1941 book Germany Must Perish! Written by a mentally deranged American Jew, this disreputable book called for the TOTAL EXTERMINATION OF THE GERMAN PEOPLE BY FORCIBLE STERILIZATION OF EVERY SINGLE GERMAN MALE!

In order to highlight the enormity of what this psychotic Jew was actually suggesting, Arthur employed the ingenious device of republishing the book on his website with a few significant alterations. First, he changed  the title toIsrael Must Perish! Then he substituted the word “Israel” for “Germany”, “Jew for “German”, and “Netanyahu” for “Hitler”. This at once transformed Kaufman’s hateful book into a Swiftian satire.

The point Arthur Topham was making was unmistakable. If it is permissible to call for the mass extermination of the GERMAN people by enforced sterilization of every single GERMAN MALE, then it was equally permissible to call for the extermination of the JEWISH people by the enforced sterilization of every single JEWISH male. The logic was impeccable.

Such perfect logic, however, was displeasing to B’nai B’rith Canada, Driven to desperation, this Jewish organization then resorted to dirty tricks. First it alleged, falsely, that Arthur had actually published a real, hard copy book calledIsrael Must Perish!  He had done no such thing.

Secondly and even more egregiously, it made out that Arthur was himself advocating the genocide of the “whole Jewish population.” He was doing no such thing. It was Detective Constable Terry Wilson of British Columbia Hate Crimes Unit who told Arthur in person that B’nai B’rith Canada was attempting to make this defamatory and unprovable allegation.

Kaufman’s “hate-filled screed titled German Must Perish! [Arthur reveals on his website] “was promoted by the most prestigious mass media publications in the USA when it appeared in 1941 prior to America’s entry into the conflict. Magazines like Time and newspapers like the New York Times and the Washington Post lauded the idea of absolutely destroying the German nation and the German race as a whole, referring to this grotesquely contemptible concept as a “SENSATIONAL IDEA!”  

The implacable Jewish hatred for the German people, oozing from every line of this nauseating book and easily demonstrated by its hysterical call for the mass “castration” of every single German male in the world by sterilization, was, you will regret to learn, not confined to one or two crazy Jews in Brooklyn. It was official government policy in an America already to a large extent dominated by its Jews.

In September 1944, the savagely vindictive Morgenthau Plan for Germany was unveiled. The evil brainchild of two Jews in the American administration, Harry Dexter White and Henry Morgenthau, this malevolent plan for postwar Germany amounted to little more than the mass castration of the German people—humiliation and punishment ad infinitum.

As the German propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels put it, “Hate and revenge of truly old-testament character are clear in these plans dreamed up by the American Jew Morgenthau. Industrialized Germany should be literally turned into a huge potato field.” This comment has naturally been dismissed as contemptible nonsense by the court historians and their Jewish mentors, given that Goebbels said it. Therefore to quote it as an indictment of Morgenthau is—you guessed it—”anti-Semitic”.

However, US Secretary of War Harry Stimson is not so easy to dismiss. Stimson’s final assessment of the Morgenthau Plan was that “it is Semitism gone wild for vengeance.” Morgenthau, he added, “was so biased by his Semitic grievances that he really is a very dangerous advisor to the President.” In his diary he wrote tersely: “Objective of punishment is prevention but not vengeance. Reason why Jew is disqualified.” (See here)

Needless to say, Stimson has himself been dismissed as an anti-Semite for saying this. De Judaiis nil nisi bonum.

Both Roosevelt and Churchill were to put their initials to the revengeful Morgenthau Plan. Helpless puppets of the powerful Jews who jerked their strings, it seems that neither world leader had much choice in the matter. Both lived to to regret their actions. Roosevelt later said “he had no idea how he could have initialled this.” Churchill was to parrot his words, “I had not time to examine the Morgenthau Plan in detail. I am sorry I put my initials to it.” (Seehere)

In his 1956 book The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed was to refer to the Morgenthau Plan as “The Talmudic Vengeance.” (Title of Chapter 42). An apt description, which perhaps helps to explain why Douglas Reed is another writer whose works organized Jewry would like to see banned, along with The Protocols of the Elders of Zion and Elizabeth Dilling’s exposé of the Talmud, The Jewish Religion.

Conclusion

To summarize: Arthur Topham has said nothing that you or I have not said repeatedly, day in and day out. If Arthur is guilty of “hate speech”, then we are all guilty of hate speech. If Arthur is to be consigned to a Canadian prison for his views, then we all deserve to join him there and be allocated adjoining cells.

If Arthur is guilty of speaking out against the state of Israel, especially after its recent war crimes in Gaza, then we are ALL guilty—for there is not one of us who has not cried out in revulsion against the wanton mass murder and maiming of Palestinians, most of them women and children, whose only crime is that they happen to own the land the Jews covet.

Let this be noted: Canada, now almost completely under the Jewish yoke, would like to criminalize EVERY SINGLE CRITICISM OF THE JEWISH STATE. Merely to give offense to a Jew, to hurt his feelings by disagreeing with him, will soon earn you a stiff fine or a prison sentence. Here is what B’nai B’rith Canada would like to see incorporated into Canadian law:

“We must repeat again and again these basic facts — TO BE ‘anti-Israel’ IS TO BE ANTI-SEMITIC. TO BOYCOTT ISRAEL, ISRAELI PROFESSORS and ISRAELI business, these are not political acts, these are acts of hate, acts of anti-Semitism! Anti-Israel hysteria is anti-Semitic hysteria. They are one and the same.”

The above statement was made in 2009 by Yuli Edelstein, Israeli Minister of Public Diplomacy and Diaspora Affairs, The capital letters are his. (See “Criminalizing Criticism of Israel in Canada”)

Here is the picture of a Palestinian child, her head half blown off by an Israeli sniper. Dare to express pity for this little girl and demand the punishment of the Israeli soldier guilty of doing this to her and you will soon face criminal proceedings in Canada.

Here is the picture of an Israeli woman, an atrocity tourist who claims that the sight of Palestinian children being killed gives her exquisite pleasure, almost bringing her an orgasm. Dare to criticize this sexually perverted Jewess and you will soon be accused of “anti-Semitism” by B’nai Brith Canada and sent to prison.

Can Canadian justice sink any lower? Do Canadian citizens really want to live in a totalitarian police state run by Jews? I don’t think so. Canadian justice must not be used as an instrument of oppression by a rabid and out-of-control Jewish minority.

B’nai B’rith Canada clearly does not represent the interests of most Canadian Jews, as it mendaciously claims. I know many Jews in Canada who totally reject being represented by this hate-filled organization. One such Jew is Arthur Topham’s beloved wife. If B’nai B’rith Canada has its way, her husband will be thrown into prison on trumped-up charges.

The witch hunt against  Arthur Topham by B’nai B’rith Canada must stop. If you are concerned for Arthur Topham and would like to see him treated fairly

PLEASE SIGN THIS PETITION

Rotherham Police are putting extra Police on the streets to deal with their most pressing problem.

No, it is not 1,400 White girls groomed, drugged, raped and trafficked, but rumours of naughty words being shouted out at the community responsible.

The Police are especially keen to speak to leaders of the rapist community to establish the extent of the problem, such as how many naughty words is it that they have actually heard.

In the month before the infamous report that showed that Rotherham Police and Council deliberately facilitated the rape of 1,400 young White girls, only 4 naughty words were reported. After the report came out, a total of 19 naughty words are alleged to have been used by White people against innocent members of the rapist community.

In several cases, White people have been arrested and charged, and since the Crown Prosecution Service is now filled with members of the aforesaid rapist community, those White people can expect to feel the full force of the law and possibly be imprisoned.

Remember, naughty words will not be tolerated! There is nothing the British Police take more seriously than people saying mean things to members of the immigrant rapist community.

The Star:

Racial abuse and assaults are on the increase in Rotherham in the wake of the child sex abuse scandal which rocked the town.

Police chiefs have revealed that the month before the publication of the damning report into the abuse of children by largely Pakistani men there were seven reports of racial harassment or racially aggravated assaults in Rotherham.

Following Professor Alexis Jay’s revelation that 1,400 children were groomed, raped and sexually assaulted over 16 years while the authorities turned a blind eye there have been 26 hate crimes reported to South Yorkshire Police.

The month before the publication of the report, which claimed police and council chiefs failed to act because of sensitivities around the ethnicity of offenders, there were seven hate crimes reported.

Chief Inspector Richard Butterworth said extra police officers were patrolling the streets and speaking to community representatives to try to establish the extent of the problem.

He said hate crimes would not be tolerated by the force.

“We have noticed a rise in respect of hate crimes since the Jay Report, which does concern us and we are taking positive action in respect of this,” he said.

“The month prior to the report there were four incidents of racial harassment made, after the report there were 19. The month before the report there were three racially aggravated assault, since the report there have been seven.

“In several of the cases people have been charged.”

He said innocent members of the public were ‘enduring racial abuse in the street’ and said a taxi driver was attacked in Wath last weekend.

“It is completely innocent people being targeted,” he said.

“These are criminal offences – you just can’t shout abuse at innocent people who have nothing to do with the Jay Report.

“We have stepped up patrols in some areas to give reassurance to people.”

He urged victims to come forward and said support would be offered.

Call South Yorkshire Police on 101.

So even though the Jay Report specifically named the rapists as all being of Pakistani heritage, Pakistanis are somehow innocent and had nothing to do with it?

The Cameron regime’s Home Secretary Theresa May has capitalized on the fears of home-grown Muslim terrorism to change existing laws to silence groups that are critical of our fake democracy.

She has defined ‘extremist activities’ as anything that is aimed at ‘overthrowing democracy,’ which includes just about every group that is critical of the current status quo.

She also came up with a new nonsensical phrase to describe these groups – ‘non-violent extremists’ – whatever that means.

Surely, if a group is non-violent, then they cannot be classed as extremist?

She has also made a point of linking Neo-Nazis with Muslim terrorists, whereas the only thing in common between the two groups is that they are both critical of Jews.

If people had any sense, they would realize that by doing this she is confirming that these new laws are for the benefit of the Jews, no one else.

She is basically saying that anyone who disagrees with our new Jewish definition of democracy is an extremist and needs to be silenced.

Guardian:

Radical Islamist extremists and neo-Nazis could be banned from making public appearances including on television under a gagging order proposed by the Conservatives with echoes of the broadcast ban that once applied to the voice of Gerry Adams.

Theresa May will announce the measure as part of a widely drawn counter-extremism strategy that is intended to catch so-called hate preachers such as Anjem Choudary, who was released on bail last week after being arrested on suspicion of encouraging terrorism.

The home secretary’s new orders would be aimed at those who undertake activities “for the purpose of overthrowing democracy”, a wide-ranging definition that could also catch a far wider range of political activists.

The “extremist asbos” are reminiscent of the 1980s broadcasting ban under which Sinn Féin spokesmen such as Adams were banned from the airwaves. Actors were used to voice the words of republicans and others with links to paramilitary groups in news reports.

May will also set out proposals to ban non-violent extremist groups that fall short of the current threshold for being banned as terrorist-related organisations.

The strategy is based on proposals that came out of David Cameron’s extremism working party set up following the murder of Lee Rigby in May last year.

The moves to ban extremist but non-violent groups and to introduce extremist asbos were blocked by the Liberal Democrats on freedom of speech grounds and so were not announced when Cameron proposed measures to tackle British jihadists travelling to Syria.

May will announce during the home affairs debate at the Tory conference that the new powers will be included in the party’s manifesto for next year’s election.

In the debate, May and Chris Grayling, the justice secretary, will reaffirm their hostility to the European court of human rights and the Human Rights Act. Grayling will renew his pledge that Britain’s supreme court will no longer be overruled by Strasbourg.

He will also highlight his recent next-term commitment to set up a network of specialist mental health centres in prisons across England and Wales.

May’s extremist disruption civil orders would contain wide-ranging restrictions on individuals who “undertake harmful activities” to spread, incite or justify hatred against people on grounds of race, religion, sexual orientation or disability.

The orders would be issued by a high court judge on an application from the police on the lower legal test of “balance of probabilities” rather than the stronger test of “beyond reasonable doubt”.

The restrictions are expected to include banning individuals from speaking at public events, protests and meetings, having to inform the police in advance of any public event, protest or meeting that they plan to attend, and banning individuals from particular public locations.

So if they think there is a possibility that you might say something they don’t like, they can silence you before you even say it.

Even more alarming is the way a sentence about putting ‘specialist mental health centres in prisons’ has been stuck in there amongst the new speech restrictions.

It looks like they may be intending to give that specialist mental health treatment to all those who disagree with their genocidal agenda.

A Clockwork Orange, anyone?