We must never forget the essential role that Black women played in our civilization.

A few years back, some stupid movie called “Hidden Figures” came out. It was about how four black women were supposedly essential to the Apollo space program.

Yeah, it was as dumb as it sounds.

We debunked it at the time in these two articles. Basically, these women only did minor things that thousands of people would have been qualified for, and constituted a tiny fraction of larger teams of people.

That didn’t stop the Jewish media from lionizing these women as geniuses and heroes, of course.

And now, Congress is honoring them with the congressional medal. Because reality isn’t nearly as important as Hollywood nonsense.

CNN:

Four African American women known as the “Hidden Figures” who worked at NASA during the Space Race are being awarded Congressional Gold Medals, the highest civilian award in the US.

That’s the name of the movie, wink wink, nudge nudge!

Yes, we get it. They get the medal because of a movie.

President Donald Trump signed into law the Hidden Figures Congressional Gold Medal Act on Friday.

Engineers Christine Darden and Mary Jackson, as well as mathematician Katherine Johnson and computer programmer Dorothy Vaughan were awarded Congressional Gold Medals.

Again, all these women were “human computers.” That means they just did calculations by hand for the actual scientists and engineers – electronic calculators didn’t exist back then.

These women weren’t designing rockets, they were just one step above being janitors.

Vaughan and Jackson, who passed away, were both awarded posthumously.

A fifth gold medal was granted in honor of all women who contributed to NASA during the Space Race.

The women, who worked at NASA’s Langley Research Center in Virginia, were so-called “human computers” who did the complex calculations that made space travel possible.

They played pivotal roles in World War II aircraft testing, supersonic flight research, and sending the Voyager probes to explore the solar system. They also helped land the first man on the moon in 1969.

These journalists are trying to make it sound like if we didn’t have these Black women, we’d never have finished any of these projects.

That’s obviously ridiculous.

Democratic Senator Kamala Harris from California, one of the people who introduced the bipartisan bill, called the women “pioneers” and an inspiration to black women across the US.

“The groundbreaking accomplishments of these four women, and all of the women who contributed to the success of NASA, helped us win the space race but remained in the dark far too long,” said Harris in a press release.

The four trailblazers paved the way for women of color to make history in fields including science, math, and technology.

Vaughan, an expert computer programmer, led the segregated West Area Computing unit at the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), which later became NASA. At the time, black women were separated from their white colleagues and limited to using segregated bathrooms and dining facilities.

So this is another case of brown people giving each other medals, huh.

It is my honor to give this here medal to this otha nigger right here.

These people really have to grasp at straws to find “accomplishments” for brown people. The official tally is now:

1. Peanut butter
2. A few negroes did calculations at NASA

Except peanut butter was invented before that Black guy thought of it, if memory serves right.

So, huh, this might be the only thing Black people have ever done, I guess. I can understand their excitement.

Why are the chinks sending out women to space? Do they intend to seduce any aliens they come across?

Conquering the galaxy is our destiny and our birthright.

Yet while we’re twiddling our thumbs worrying about stupid crap like tranny bathrooms and human rights for Blacks, the Chinese are cucking us out of our achievements by actually having a bold vision for their space program.

This is unacceptable.

If the Chinese ever get far ahead of us in the space race and get a foothold off-world, they may be getting an insurmountable advantage over us. Once you’re out building zero-g manufacturing plants and harvesting asteroids and comets for materials, you hit a economic and population growth curve that is exponentially higher than anything possible on earth.

We can’t let the Jews get in the way of beating the yellow menace to this civilization-changing research.

The Guardian:

This time next year, there may be a new world leader in lunar exploration. If all goes according to plan, China will have done something no other space-faring superpower has been able to do: land on the far side of the moon. China is rocketing ahead with its plans for lunar exploration. In 2018, they will launch a pair of missions known collectively as Chang’e 4. It is the fourth mission in a series named after the Chinese moon goddess.

If the Chinese succeed in this, they’ll officially be ahead of us in the space race. Let that sink in.

Our technology is definitely more advanced – we just lack the will to get this done.

There’s no doubt in my heart that we’d already have gundams if it weren’t for the Jews. Yes, the greatest obstacle to making anime real is definitely the kike subversion of our institutions.

The first component of Chang’e 4 is scheduled to lift off in June. It will be a relay satellite stationed some 60,000km behind the moon and will provide a communications link between Earth and the lunar far side. Once this link is established, it will allow China to send the second part of the mission: a lander to the far side’s surface.

Landing on the far side of the moon is something no one has tried before. “The Chinese are pushing back the frontier with such a technically challenging mission,” says Brian Harvey, space analyst and author of China in Space: The Great Leap Forward.

China’s lunar exploration programme started in 2007 with Chang’e 1, a simple lunar orbiter. In 2010, Chang’e 2 also went into lunar orbit before setting off for a trek across the solar system that culminated in a flyby of asteroid Toutatis in 2012.

In 2013 Chang’e 3, deploying the Jade Rabbit rover, made headlines for the first soft landing on the moon since 1976. So far, so impressive, but all China had done was catch up with the achievements of the US and USSR. Chang’e 4, however, will be a space first.

Nobody has landed on the far side of the moon, mainly because of the communications difficulty. Yet the scientific payoff is huge. Being in the shadow of the moon allows stray radio signals from Earth to be blocked so the view of the radio universe is unparalleled.

Do we really want the Chinks to be the ones to find the hidden Nazi moon bases?

Heino Falcke, Radboud University, Nijmegen, is hoping to take full advantage of this by supplying a radio telescope to the Chinese mission. His aim is to test how easy it will be to pick up signals from the early universe before there were any stars.

Radio telescopes in orbit around the Earth have to deal with all sorts of interference from human civilization, introducing all sorts of noise into their readings and thus significantly reducing their potential accuracy. Sensors placed on the dark side of the moon would have the entire mass of the moon to absorb stray transmissions from earth, and thus have a much better chance at finding interesting stuff out there in space.

This means if there’s aliens out there that we missed, the chinks are going to be the first ones to know about it. They’ll also have exclusive access to all sorts of potentially important scientific data.

More importantly, they’re getting valuable experience setting up infrastructure off-world, as well as running a space program.

If we had devoted even a fraction of what we spent on Jew wars to developing alternative launch systems, we could be building massive space colonies by now.

This stuff is mostly achievable using current technology. It just requires political commitment.

Indeed, I could be writing anti-Semitic blog posts from outer space as we speak, instead of being tethered to the earth like a worm…

The Jews can never be forgiven for trying to take this future away from us.

A guaranteed box office hit if I ever saw one.

Prepare to be inspired, goyim.

You’ve always insisted that Blacks were dumb and useless. Little did you know, all your greatest accomplishments would have been impossible without the secret assistance of Black female geniuses.

It’s time we finally lifted the veil of deceit obscuring our past. It’s time to admit that the real credit for the space program lies with the Blacks.

Hey! Don’t goof around. This is serious. Prepare to have your prejudices challenged.

WCQS:

On Feb. 20, 1962, John Glenn blasted off into space and became the first American to orbit Earth. Behind the scenes, thousands of engineers and mathematicians worked tirelessly to make NASA’s Friendship 7 mission a success. Historical photos show them as white men in crisp white shirts and ties — but we now know there’s more to that picture.

In her book Hidden Figures, author Margot Lee Shetterly gives name and voice to the African-American women who worked as human “computers” in the space program. Now, just a few months after the book was published, a new movie is also telling that story. (The film rights were optioned just a couple of weeks after Shetterly got her book deal.)

Wow, they didn’t waste any time there, did they?

I guess this was a story that (((they))) really wanted to push.

As mathematicians and engineers, these women made incalculable contributions to the space program — and the fact that they were African-Americans working in the segregated South makes their stories even more remarkable.

Incalculable, goyim!

Without these Black women, we’d still be living in caves!

If 3 Blacks got us to the moon… Imagine what an all-Black space program could accomplish.

In the film Hidden Figures, Oscar-winning actress Octavia Spencer plays Dorothy Vaughan, NASA’s first African-American supervisor. The movie shows a tenacious Vaughan insisting that her title reflect the supervisory work she was already doing.

Uh, let’s not get ahead of ourselves here.

According to Wikipedia, she was made head of “West Area Computers,” a segregated group of Black women who’s task was to do hand calculations that the actual engineers and scientists didn’t have the time to do.

It was grunt work, which required no creative thinking or advanced scientific understanding – they just processed data.

Taraji P. Henson plays Katherine Johnson, an extraordinary mathematician who calculated the trajectories for Glenn’s Friendship 7 mission. (Johnson also worked on the Apollo and space shuttle programs.) Sitting in her trailer after shooting a scene in which Johnson explains a difficult equation to her perplexed male colleagues, Henson confesses that in real life, “Math and science scares me. It makes my heart palpitate.”

Don’t let your lying eyes deceive you; this woman is 100% Black.

Even ignoring the fact that this woman is an octoroon or something, this narrative is stretched pretty thin.

Calculating the trajectories of object in a vacuum isn’t something so complex that they couldn’t have found thousands of other people who could have done the job. I mean, maybe she was a genius or something at making these conventional physics calculations. But they’re trying to make it look like she was doing ground-breaking, novel work that “baffled” the scientists and engineers around her. That’s nonsense.

From her Wikipedia entry:

Johnson co-authored 26 scientific papers. NASA maintains a list of Johnson’s most significant articles with links to its archival search tool to find others.

Johnson’s social impact as a pioneer in space science and computing may be seen both from the honors she has received and the number of times her story is presented as a role model.

In other words, everything she’s done was as part of a larger team, and her prestige is based on Jew hype.

I’m not saying she wasn’t a smart woman, or that she didn’t contribute to the space program. I’m sure she did her job properly. Well, I hope so. But to claim she was some essential, key member is ridiculous.

Henson remembers feeling a little angry when she first learned about Johnson’s achievements. “The world needs to know her,” she says. ” … Whenever I watch any footage of anything about NASA, you see men. You see a smoke-filled room full of suits and ties. You never see women.”

Singer and actress Janelle Monáe cried when she first read the script. She plays Mary Jackson, who, according to NASA, “may have been the only black female aeronautical engineer in the field” in the 1950s.

Pretty impressive! She should definitely be presented as a role model for Blacks.

But, uh, how many engineers were working at NASA in the 50’s, exactly?

Source.

So, at it’s peak, in the 50’s NASA hired like, 3000 engineers. With the other technical experts, that’s like 7000 people. Some of them probably left, so the total is probably higher.

In other words, this woman’s work accounted for less than 0.05% of the engineering that went into the early space program.

But never mind that, we need to photoshop Black women into every old NASA picture to correct this “false historical perception,” that White men did everything.

Africaneesha’s insights were key to the development of the rocket prototype.

Monáe says, “I was really upset because, as an African-American young woman, I had no idea who Mary Jackson was, who Dorothy Vaughan was, who Katherine Johnson was, who the colored ‘computers’ were. I had no idea. And I’m just like: This clearly had to be a mistake. These are American heroes. Without their brains, without their hard work and dedication to NASA and the long hours that they worked together, we would have not made it into space. We would have not made it into orbit.“

You’re literally nothing without the Negro, White man.

Lol.

Ironically, if there’s a small minority group working at NASA which could realistically be credited with invaluable contributions to the American space program, it wouldn’t be Blacks.

It would be Nazis.

After the war, the US brought all of Nazi Germany’s top rocket scientist here in “Operation Paperclip.” Because the German’s rocket technology was far ahead of the allies, their knowledge and creative genius was at the core of the American space program.

Werner Von Braun, the designer of the Saturn V rocket and director at NASA, was a SS officer during the war.

When can we expect an inspirational story about Nazis overcoming prejudices and accomplishing great things in bigoted, anti-German America?

Hmmm.

Last year India received £280million in aid from British taxpayers. On Tuesday it launched its first rocket to Mars at a cost of more than £45million.

Asked why we were handing over money to a country that can afford to send rockets into space, a spokesman for the Department for International Development said: “Not a penny of British taxpayers’ aid money has gone on India’s space programme.”

And with that, the unidentified spokesman should take a bow. He or she is the runaway winner of the contest.

Mind you, fatuous doesn’t even come close to describing the deliberate, calculating missing-of-the-point mindset revealed by that statement.

The issue is what are we doing handing over British taxpayers’ money to a country wealthy enough to allocate around £750million of its own money for a space programme?

Aid is trumpeted by its advocates as a form of moral duty on the wealthy West – that we have an obligation to do our bit to help those less well off than ourselves. As David Cameron put it: “Even when things are difficult at home we should fulfil our moral obligations to the poorest of the world.”The majority of people would agree with the broad sentiment that the wealthy do indeed have a charitable duty to the poor. But fine as that sentiment is in intention, when applied internationally it can be distorted beyond all sense. For one thing, there’s the corruption intrinsically linked to aid.

Study after study reveals the corruption that is endemic in the aid industry – and that’s what it is, a multi-billion-pound global industry.

Then there’s the fact that much aid ends up making things worse – by subsidising inefficiency and bankrolling societies that are incapable of standing on their own two feet, it can act to prevent poor areas ever adopting the reforms or developing the tools needed to grow and prosper.

As for our “moral obligation to the poorest of the world”, if you want to understand how distorted that gets, just look closely at what the Department for International Development spokesman had to say about the Indian space programme.

Read More