🇫🇷 #14Juillet L'arrivée du Flyboard pour ouvrir le défilé pic.twitter.com/RXfHQAO2ay

— Le 20Heures France2 (@20hFrance2) July 14, 2019

How much do you want to fly around with your guns? Americans need this invention.

Pure freedom.

France 24:

A French inventor and entrepreneur on Sunday soared above the Champs-Elysees on a turbine engine-powered flyboard in front of President Emmanuel Macron and other EU leaders.

Former jet-skiing champion Franky Zapata, grasping a rifle in a sign of the possible military uses of his device, took to the air in a futuristic showpiece of the annual Bastille Day parade.

French Armed Forces Minister Florence Parly told France Inter radio ahead of the parade that the flyboard “can allow tests for different kinds of uses, for example as a flying logistical platform or, indeed, as an assault platform.”

Of course we’re going to use it as an assault platform.

The fuck you think this is?

Every potential assault platform can and will be used as an assault platform.

We’re going to bring this flying board thing to America and it’s going to be available at every store — everywhere — because who doesn’t want to fly around in this thing while wielding some guns?

America is all about freedom and flying around with a gun in your hand is overpowered freedom.

This and the recent advancements in jet pack technology are moving us towards jump packs and the creation of the Space Marines.

We’re moving forward.

By the way, this is Franky Zapata:

And this is what he does:

Some highlights from his website:

With engine out capability, the Flyboard Air can lose one engine and still continue the mission. If two engines go out, the Flyboard Air will make a controlled descent.

Auto-hover mode allows the pilot to maintain a steady altitude without having to manage the throttle.

Isolated turbines with improved cooling and lubrication increase jet engine reliability and lifetime.

Embedded stabilization independent of flight controls.

Status indications via heads-up display inform pilot of engine status, fuel levels, altitude and speed.

Independent engine electronics means any possible electronic failure can only effect one engine at a time and the Flyboard Air can still safely fly.

Independent engine fuel supplies.

Triple redundant flight controls – two wired systems, plus one wireless backup system.

Quick release boots means the pilot can quickly let go of the Flyboard Air in case of an emergency water landing.

As you can see, he seems to have this thing figured out.

But most importantly, there’s this:

Any airworthiness certifications?
Currently it can be flown in the United States as an ultralight aircraft.

…

Can it be armed? 
It is possible. We do not have any current customers that have asked for this integration.

…

Can you fire a weapon while flying it?
It is possible and is part of some of our customers’ development strategy. We have some alternate flight control ideas to facilitate weapons employment but they have not been tested yet.

This is what Trump should be basing his campaign on.

He should promise everyone their own free Flyboard. Everyone’s moving towards promising free stuff, so he might as well promise something that can beat free healthcare, free college, free $1,000 a month and free open borders.

The Flyboard is the answer.

I’ve had just about enough of waiting for this.

Trump is already looking forward to after the defeat of the Jews, when we will be forced to fight reptoids from space.

RT:

Members of the US House Armed Services Committee have voted to create a “Space Corps,” a sixth branch of the country’s armed forces focused on military maneuvers beyond the Earth’s atmosphere.

The space corps, which has yet to gain full approval, would absorb all of the Air Force’s current space missions under the umbrella of a new US Space Command. It would also make the head of the new service the eighth member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

The plan, which could be implemented as soon as January 2019, has been developed as part of a radical reorganization of the US Air Force.

Several members of the congressional committee claimed to be blindsided by the proposal, and attempted to slow down the changes until they heard testimony from US Defense Secretary James Mattis. The challenge was later dropped, however.

Michael Turner (R-Ohio) said he only learned about the proposal last week, when it first came before the subcommittee on strategic forces.

BLINDSIDED BY SURPRISE SPACE MARINE PROGRAM!

“I chastised my staff and said, ‘How could I not know that this was happening?’ They said, ‘Well, they had a meeting about it and you missed it,’” Turner said. “A meeting is certainly not enough. Maybe we do need a space corps, but I think this bears more than just discussions in a subcommittee.

“We have not had Secretary Mattis come before us and tell us what this means. We have not heard from the secretary of the Air Force. There’s a whole lot of work we need to do before we go as far as creating a new service branch.”

Turner’s Republican colleague Mike Rogers (R-Alabama) argued that the plan had been in development since the publication of the Rumsfeld Commission report, a study outlining future US space strategy, in 2001.

“There’s been nothing shortsighted about this,” Rogers said, according to Federal News Radio. “We started working on it vigorously in September, and we’ve had countless meetings with a number of experts who have advised us as to how this should be construed. In fact, this idea for a Space Corps as one of the solutions to Air Force space came from the Rumsfeld Commission in 2001.”

Under the plan, all operations involving the Air Force’s secretive X-37B spaceplane would fall under the control of the US Space Corps.

The X-37B, which looks like a small Space Shuttle orbiter, is due to launch again in August after its last flight lasted a record 718 days.

The space corps, which would be the first new military service since 1947, is not specifically banned by the Outer Space Treaty, a 1967 international agreement outlawing the use of the moon and other celestial bodies from being used as military outposts.

Yeah.

I think that’s a treaty we’re gonna have to renegotiate.

This is a pretty big deal. Funny it isn’t getting much media coverage.

I mean, this is a story that a real media would make a big deal about – TRUMP CREATING STARSHIP TROOPERS SPACE MARINES SPACE CORPS.

People love this sort of thing. It would certainly get better ratings than this boring, endless Russian hoax saga.

So no, I don’t agree with James O’Keefe’s secretly recorded CNN videos where they say that this is about ratings. I think they’re telling their staffs that it’s about ratings to justify why they’re only covering one story. The motives are actually Jewish.

Since the necessity of WHITE SHARIA became evident to the editorial staff of the Daily Stormer, many readers have complained that although they believe in the tenets of WHITE SHARIA, they dislike it because of the name – they associate the word “Sharia” with Islam.

This is understandable. No one wants to be associated with the monkeylike Islamic hordes.

However, their perception is one based on total ignorance of the fact of what Sharia actually is: an ancient Indo-Aryan code of conduct.

The root of the Arabic word “Sharia” – a word which means “the way” or “the path” – is in the Indo-European languages of Urdu and Persian.

For those who do not know – and perhaps there has been no reason to know until now – all European languages have the same origin as these other two Indo-European languages: an ancient Aryan civilization that stretched across the Eurasian continent.

Even now, many, many words remain the same in English and Persian.

Wikipedia:

As Indo-European languages, English and Persian are daughter languages of their common ancestral Proto-Indo-European, and still share many cognate words of similar forms. Examples of these include: English (mother) and Persian (mādar), English (father) and Persian (padar), English (daughter) and Persian (dokhtar), English (brother) and Persian (barādar) and English (name) and Persian (nām). However, this article will be concerned with loanwords, that is, words in English that derive from Persian, either directly, or more often, from one or more intermediary languages.

Arabic, on the other hand, is a Semitic language. Semitic languages are a totally separate, non-white, Afro-Asiatic language group.

Modern Semitic languages

Indeed, the Persians themselves were white up until they were invaded by the Arabs in 7th century and raped like goats. You still see whitish looking Persians now, sometimes.

The word “Sharia” was not used in original Islam very often at all, and this borrowed Indo-European word only appears in the Koran twice.

The Jews have also ripped-off this word from their time as merchants in Babylon to refer to their own law (just as they have borrowed so many German words to create Yiddish), indicating that the word was widely used in ancient White Persia to describe a divine legal system.

In modern Urdu, the word “شریعت” is still used in a non-Islamic sense.

The same is true in modern Persian, where it can be used to refer to merely “tradition” as well as religious law.

Of course, many of the uses in these languages are Islamic, but that is obviously due to it’s wide use in modern times as being associated with Islam – because the sandmonkeys appropriated our culture.

Basically…

Pretty much, claiming that Sharia is an invention of the Arabs is like claiming the blacks built the Egyptian Pyramids.

Denying the white race’s right to Sharia Law amounts to giving away our sacred heritage to a hostile, evil foreign people hellbent on destroying us – and destroying us using our own legal system.

It is time for the white man to stand-up and reclaim his rightful heritage. This is a deep part of our being that goes back way before Christianity, before Greek, Slavic and Germanic paganism, to our very origins. Although most of the ideas of WHITE SHARIA are the same as those of pagan or Christian law, by adopting WHITE SHARIA, we are restoring the very core of our racial soul.

Continued Hatred of WHITE SHARIA?

Those who continue to disagree with the use of the ancient white system of Sharia Law need to disprove the findings of this research. Of course, that cannot be done, because these findings are 100% factually accurate.

After the release of these findings, anyone saying that the Islamic apes invented – rather than ripped-off – Sharia Law might as well be saying that three black women were responsible for the moon landing.

How could anyone be so absurd as to believe that goatmen invented WHITE SHARIA?