I don’t think young people are aware of this, but in American history, there used to be generational cultural differences. Young people had music, slang, and esoteric cultural memes that were unique, that older people were not aware of.

This is no longer the case. Because of the internet, and the fact that everyone is on the same platforms, younger generations, including gen Z (these people are like 30 now, by the way) and the generation younger than them, which I believe is called “gen Q,” have cultural and social cues that are just watered down versions of millennialisms.

Everything I see from younger people on the internet is just progressively sanitized versions of stuff I saw on /b/ in 2004. It’s sickening.

Sometimes there is new slang, but it’s not clear where it originates from, and everyone of all age groups starts using it at the same time. Paul Skallas, who I believe is the core philosopher of the 21st century, has said that we are trapped in 2004.

Robot says:

Paul Skallas is a writer and commentator known for his theory that culture became “stuck” around 2004, a concept he popularized through social media.He posits that this period marked a significant shift where the monoculture fractured, leading to a lack of overarching cultural narratives and preventing substantive changes in pop culture. According to Skallas, this stagnation is evident in the entertainment industry, where content often feels recycled, with sequels, remakes, and nostalgic themes dominating the landscape.He has suggested that the mid-2000s, particularly around 2004 or 2006, was a pivotal moment when the cultural landscape shifted toward a state of repetition and diminished innovation. While he acknowledges the decentralization of media and the rise of the internet as potential contributing factors, he admits the exact cause remains unclear.

The cause is sort of unclear, but it is also obvious that it is the internet. We are all in the same space now.

As a millennial, I was a member of the last generation to grow up with a culture that was not internet based. At least as a younger teenager. By the time I was 20, it was all the internet. But before that, there was a difference in culture among young people. I remember my father trying to use youth slang, which is normal enough, and using it in the wrong way. That is now impossible. Everyone on the internet is in the same monoculture.

There is some element of this that isn’t bad. Historically, like as in, a long time ago, people lived the same lives as their grandparents. And their great great great grandparents. This was before the Industrial Revolution. After the Industrial Revolution, you had major technological advancements that caused cultural changes every generation, which left grandparents feeling very alienated by all the alien shit their grandkids were into. It is obviously better to have a consistency of culture.

Well, it’s good to have a consistency of culture if it is medieval culture. If it is 2004 bland and nihilistic horseshit hedonism, it is really not that great to have it as a stagnant culture.

It is assumed that young people added things like “take the L” or “posting the W” to the slang. But when I see that, I think “what is this boomer tripe? What a stupid phrase.” Further, there is no evidence that young people made these phrases. They used it on TikTok and whatever, but no one knows who comes up with these things, and people of all ages, including boomers, will pick up on these language additions and use them.

If there is a change, it is that young people are less edgy and less hip. They are worse than even millennials (who I think are worse than boomers), because there is no room for creativity on the internet, and so all young people do is recycle millennial material and make it gayer and more retarded.

I have no idea what the implications of this are, and unlike I usually do, I am not going to draw some kind of insight or meaningful conclusion about the nature of this phenomenon. I think it probably means nothing good or bad can happen, nothing new at all can happen, youth energy doesn’t really exist in the way it previously did. I don’t think going to punk rock shows and taking acid and jumping around and having sex in the bathroom was a good thing. And maybe it wasn’t that much different than what boomers were doing, just with worse music. But there was a break with the previous generation, which meant that there was at least potential room for something new that was good to emerge. I think it is now impossible for anything new and good to emerge from the youth.

The youth are now against Israel, of course, but so is everyone who isn’t old.

These Gallup numbers don’t separate the age groups meaningfully.

The 35-54 age group is much too wide. Of the 23% of that group that have a positive view of Bibi, I would think the overwhelming majority of the supporters would be between 45 and 54, whereas 35-44 would have the same opinion as 18-34.

There would be some differences in generations, because the younger the generation, the less white it is. So it will be different on some things, when measured by age alone. I don’t know or care what is going on with immigrants or black people. I assume they are against Israel, when it comes to this particular topic, and that’s fine, but in general, their opinions do not matter to me.

One thing I don’t know is how the browning of America will affect culture. I assume it will not be good. But also, I think younger whites, particularly men, are feeling under attack, which will lead to you know, whatever.

I understand this article is not good or important. But I think the basic observations are important, and possibly something that people are not really noticing. But we are stagnant. There is nothing new coming from the youth. Everything is just being recycled and made shittier in the process.

It is boring and disgusting.

To be clear, I do not think the decay is a result of technology, but simply enabled by it. The fact that everyone is on the same level and in the same space together could mean that young people would be bringing older people forward in a positive direction, but instead the opposite is happening, with terms like “take the L” being used by men in their forties, despite the fact that they suck, while teenagers listen to early 00s indie rock, despite the fact that it sucks. Everything just spirals towards the lowest common denominator, with all of the worst traits of millennials being promoted, and millennials adopting the worst traits of the younger generations. Millennials did not have “woke” as youths. We could say “faggot” and “nigger” without people throwing a fit. But then, in their thirties, millennials became the hardest core fighters for wokeism, apparently feeling it was the hip young trend?

Now, teenagers listen to Joe Rogan and get convinced that Peter Thiel, the guy running the AI targeting system for the Israelis, giving lectures on the Antichrist, is somehow not concerning and may in fact be totally normal. Meanwhile, every male of every age is chronically masturbating and no one has connected this to the testosterone plunge, and the last thing on anyone’s mind is ███████ and ███████ ████.

I recently saw some zoomer plebs shocked by scenes from 1990s films showing that high school kids went to parties on the weekends and hung out with each other, having fun times. Apparently, zoomers and younger (zoomers are all like almost 30 now actually, the generation younger than them I think is called Gen Q), just stay in their houses and masturbate.

Well, I lived in the 1990s, and I can tell you the parties were real and we had fun times all the time.

I have here collected some photos from my personal collection and from some old friends from the 1990s to share here for the sake of the nostalgia of my millennials and so the younger folks can learn about just how good we had it.

Not only did we have parties, we had fun creatures. It was when the Zionists did 9/11 that everything went bad. Under the Patriot Act, the Zionist Occupation Government banned all of our furry friends except dogs and cats. Yes, these photos are real. We partied and we had creatures for pets, many of whom could talk and love us all. They had social security numbers and everything, but the ATF shot them all, claiming they were a threat to Israel’s security.

Although the cops are still trying to kill everyone’s dogs, people believe that many dogs survived the pet holocaust that killed all these other species of pet because dogs are small and nimble and could dodge the bullets of cops, who have an average IQ of 76 and cannot shoot accurately. During most raids, cops kill more of each other than they do pets.

We used to go to music concerts as well. I saw many music bands in the 1990s, especially at the Warped Tour. After 9/11, Zionists banned the Warped Tour and had all pop punk musicians killed with exploding toothpaste and poisonous snakes.

We won’t ever bring back pop punk bands or those other kinds of pets we used to have. They were all murdered. However, maybe someday we will bring back fun times.

Who can say?

Would you rather live 90 years without drinking alcohol or 88 years having a blast? How can these people pretend two years is somehow a high price to pay for improving your overall quality of life so much?

New York Post:

This is such a buzz kill.

As it turns out, consuming just one alcoholic beverage per day — whether it be a pint of beer, a glass of wine or a shot of your favorite spirit — can shorten your lifespan by approximately two-and-a-half months, one expert asserts.

Dr. Tim Stockwell, of the Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, told Daily Mail that those who drink significantly more alcohol than that — about 35 beverages a week — could slash a staggering two years off their lifespan.

It’s a rude awakening for those who might like to unwind with a glass of pinot after a long day, or who frequent happy hours with friends or colleagues.

“Alcohol is our favorite recreational drug. We use it for pleasure and relaxation, and the last thing we want to hear is that it causes any harm,” he said. “It’s comforting to think that drinking is good for our health, but unfortunately, it’s based on poor science.”

Unfortunately, according to the doc, no amount of alcohol is safe for boozers — and his claims are backed up by science.

Hey, listen: I don’t even believe this.

But if you want to live to be 90 years old, you are sick.

As America’s Poet Laureate said:

Fuck that! Take drugs, rape sluts
Make fun of gay clubs, men who wear make-up
Get aware, wake up, get a sense of humor

Just live your life.

The wisest man who ever lived, King Solomon, said the best thing that you can do is eat, drink, and be merry.

He didn’t say “the best thing you can do is act like a neurotic faggot.”

“Moderate alcohol intake benefits working memory performance throughout the adult lifespan to a greater extent than whole-life abstinence.” https://t.co/FmTmUXZXWT pic.twitter.com/gegbwHngu3

— Rolf Degen (@DegenRolf) November 21, 2023

Joe Rogan is back on YouTube. I was on a Joe Rogan blackout, because I refuse to use Spotify. I don’t even have a cellphone anymore. I had this Chinese tablet thing with Android you could run the apps on, which I could carry around like a phone and answer messages on WiFi, but I dropped it in a hotel bathtub. I put it in rice and it didn’t work. (These things happen.) I don’t really miss people being able to contact me when I’m out. I think, in fact, people being able to contact you when you’re out is hellish proposal. Plus, I’m on a computer all day long, I don’t need a screen with me when I’m rambling.

Before that whole Spotify thing, I used to listen to the Joe Rogan podcast semi-regularly. I think the podcast is still unavailable without the app (Spotify didn’t pay him $100 million for nothing), but he’s on YouTube.

I just watched his interview with Tim Dillion from earlier this week. I really enjoyed it. Mostly in the way I would enjoy a Chevy Chase film. Not quite in the way I would enjoy a John Hughes film. The only thing I enjoy more than a John Hughes film is driving a motorcycle really fast while intoxicated and maybe some other ridiculous, stupid, dangerous behavior, like playing with firearms and pretending I never took gun safety with a friend who legit never took gun safety. The podcast is not meaningful political content, but entertainment. But there is political commentary you could make about it.

There were some pretty interesting bits. Joe is either going in a really good direction, or Tim Dillion has the ability to bring out the best in him. There were a lot of good bits. Tim Dillion is an incredibly talented fat Irish slob. Like the best of our people, he rides the edge to the point where you feel like he could just go ahead and jump off at any point.

Some of the stuff was really quite shocking to me. The most notable was probably the Kanye commentary. At one point, Joe says something (paraphrasing): “he says all this crazy stuff, but then he’ll like, pull out facts. Like one time he pulled out this chart that showed that Jewish people control basically all of the media, and it’s like, well, I don’t know what to say about that.” He didn’t say anything about it, but then added “I don’t know, maybe they’re just good at it?”

Dillion said: “Israel canceled their pride parade this year. Yeah. It was something with with yellow on the flag for the hostages. Also, they needed the material they were going to use for the parade to massacre children in Gaza. You know, the fireworks and stuff, they needed that to make bombs to kill kids.”

The fact that the Jews are now on the table for discussion on Joe Rogan is something new, and it makes me feel new. It makes me feel so fresh and so clean, clean.

There are several other interesting segments. They did a bit about how abstract art is a money laundering scam. I’ve written quite a bit about that, but you know, I’ve written… quite a bit. I don’t expect anyone has read everything I’ve written. I certainly haven’t. So that part might be educational for people.

They also do a big Pizzagate bit. Among several other edgy bits.

But in general, it felt like I was listening to two of my readers have a conversation, while also trying to keep things from violating ToS.

If I was going to recommend it, because it’s interesting how much the line has been crossed in mainstream media and because it’s entertaining (Dillion is so quick it’s monstrous). The man is a monster.

By the way, at one point, in reference to Jews, he says our kin never don’t dominate any industries. I think we do dominate comedy. And alcoholism and domestic violence (though those are not positive activities). But all the great comics are Irish. There are a few funny Jews (Woody Allen and Larry David are funny), I guess, but the fact that there are so many Jewish comedians and comic writers is just because the entire entertainment industry is run by Jewish nepotism. There are some funny blacks. But the Irish dominate. I don’t like George Carlin, and in fact think the world would be a better place if his alcoholic father had accidentally beat him all the way to death. But he’s at the top of most comedy lists. Personally, I think Norm MacDonald actually was the funniest comedian ever. I know people like to point out that Louis CK is a quarter Jewish, but he’s also half Irish. There are a lot I won’t mention who were very popular but who embarrass me. Shane Gillis is currently dominating.

I guess I shouldn’t say it, but I will because it’s true: there’s no living writer funnier than me.

There is a limits-pushing and self-destructiveness inherent in the Irish that makes us very good comedians (as well as terrorists and other criminals). It can be good or bad. But Tim should be pumping us up. We need to start pumping each other up if we are ever going to establish an Irish-dominated global order.

So, whatever. I thought it was worth sharing. I was going to write about the potato-faced Irish moron Piers Morgan (who also is constantly pushing limits in a bizarre way where he isn’t aware he’s doing it) interviewing Kevin Spacey and then doing a psycho six-man panel debate with D-list internet celebrities about the interview. I’m 100% team Spacey, by the way. He might be a homo, but he was one of the good ones (closeted). And he’s been to a criminal and civil trial and be proved innocent of all the charges. I’m for Taliban style rule in America, but I’m also for truth and justice. I don’t believe in this bullshit of “well, he’s gay so I support the Jewish media making up stupid lies about him and ruining his life.” It’s the same thing with Harvey Weinstein (who, by the way, was defended on the Joe and Tim Podcast), Hunter Biden, whoever. You have to believe in truth and justice. Supporting your enemies lying and destroying people you don’t like is retard-tier.

I should write more in this section. But I feel like taking a water bottle full of Beefeater and riding the metro around aimlessly, listening to the Doobie Brothers on my iPod and watching the people.

I want to understand them better. The people.

It’s important to me, moving forward, to understand the people.

The best way to understand them is to watch them. It’s more useful even than talking to them. Especially for me, because when I talk to people, there’s a 100% chance I’m going to say something fucked up within the first five minutes (more likely in the first two) and ruin the whole dynamic, making the entire conversation about the person trying to understand me rather than the other way around. I have little interest in people understanding me. I am a vessel of the Lord. An imperfect one, but nonetheless, it is the purpose of my existence.

It doesn’t matter who I am.

What matters is my plan.

Joe Rogan is back on YouTube. I was on a Joe Rogan blackout, because I refuse to use Spotify. I don’t even have a cellphone anymore. I had this Chinese tablet thing with Android you could run the apps on, which I could carry around like a phone and answer messages on WiFi, but I dropped it in a hotel bathtub. I put it in rice and it didn’t work. (These things happen.) I don’t really miss people being able to contact me when I’m out. I think, in fact, people being able to contact you when you’re out is a hellish proposal. Plus, I’m on a computer all day long, I don’t need a screen with me when I’m rambling.

Before that whole Spotify thing, I used to listen to the Joe Rogan podcast semi-regularly. I think the podcast is still unavailable without the app (Spotify didn’t pay him $100 million for nothing), but he’s on YouTube.

I just watched his interview with Tim Dillon from earlier this week. I really enjoyed it. Mostly in the way I would enjoy a Chevy Chase film. Not quite in the way I would enjoy a John Hughes film. The only thing I enjoy more than a John Hughes film is driving a motorcycle really fast while intoxicated and maybe some other ridiculous, stupid, dangerous behavior, like playing with firearms and pretending I never took gun safety with a friend who legit never took gun safety. The podcast is not meaningful political content, but entertainment. But there is political commentary you could make about it.

There were some pretty interesting bits. Joe is either going in a really good direction, or Tim Dillon has the ability to bring out the best in him. There were a lot of good bits. Tim Dillon is an incredibly talented fat Irish slob. Like the best of our people, he rides the edge to the point where you feel like he could just go ahead and jump off at any point.

Some of the stuff was really quite shocking to me. The most notable was probably the Kanye commentary. At one point, Joe says something (paraphrasing): “He says all this crazy stuff, but then he’ll like, pull out facts. Like one time he pulled out this chart that showed that Jewish people control basically all of the media, and it’s like, well, I don’t know what to say about that.” He didn’t say anything about it, but then added “I don’t know, maybe they’re just good at it?”

Dillon said: “Israel canceled their pride parade this year. Yeah. It was something with yellow on the flag for the hostages. Also, they needed the material they were going to use for the parade to massacre children in Gaza. You know, the fireworks and stuff, they needed that to make bombs to kill kids.”

The fact that the Jews are now on the table for discussion on Joe Rogan is something new, and it makes me feel new. It makes me feel so fresh and so clean, clean.

There are several other interesting segments. They did a bit about how abstract art is a money laundering scam. I’ve written quite a bit about that, but you know, I’ve written… quite a bit. I don’t expect anyone has read everything I’ve written. I certainly haven’t. So that part might be educational for people.

They also do a big Pizzagate bit. Among several other edgy bits.

But in general, it felt like I was listening to two of my readers have a conversation, while also trying to keep things from violating ToS.

I’d recommend it because it shows how much the line has been crossed in mainstream media, and because it’s entertaining (Dillon is so quick it’s monstrous). The man is a monster.

By the way, at one point, in reference to Jews, he says our kin don’t dominate any industries. I think we do dominate comedy. And alcoholism and domestic violence (though those are not positive activities). But all the great comics are Irish. There are a few funny Jews (Woody Allen and Larry David are funny), I guess, but the fact that there are so many Jewish comedians and comic writers is just because the entire entertainment industry is run by Jewish nepotism. There are some funny blacks. But the Irish dominate. I don’t like George Carlin, and in fact think the world would be a better place if his alcoholic father had accidentally beat him all the way to death. But he’s at the top of most comedy lists. Personally, I think Norm MacDonald actually was the funniest comedian ever. I know people like to point out that Louis CK is a quarter Jewish, but he’s also half Irish. There are a lot I won’t mention who were very popular but who embarrass me. Shane Gillis is currently dominating.

I guess I shouldn’t say it, but I will because it’s true: there’s no living writer funnier than me.

There is a limits-pushing and self-destructiveness inherent in the Irish that makes us very good comedians (as well as terrorists and other criminals). It can be good or bad. But Tim should be pumping us up. We need to start pumping each other up if we are ever going to establish an Irish-dominated global order.

So, whatever. I thought it was worth sharing. I was going to write about the potato-faced Irish moron Piers Morgan (who also is constantly pushing limits in a bizarre way where he isn’t aware he’s doing it) interviewing Kevin Spacey and then doing a psycho six-man panel debate with D-list internet celebrities about the interview. I’m 100% team Spacey, by the way. He might be a homo, but he was one of the good ones (closeted). And he’s been to a criminal and civil trial and been proved innocent of all the charges. I’m for Taliban style rule in America, but I’m also for truth and justice. I don’t believe in this bullshit of “well, he’s gay so I support the Jewish media making up stupid lies about him and ruining his life.” It’s the same thing with Harvey Weinstein (who, by the way, was defended on the Joe and Tim Podcast), Hunter Biden, whoever. You have to believe in truth and justice. Supporting your enemies lying and destroying people you don’t like is retard-tier.

I should write more in this section. But I feel like taking a water bottle full of Beefeater and riding the metro around aimlessly, listening to the Doobie Brothers on my iPod and watching the people.

I want to understand them better. The people.

It’s important to me, moving forward, to understand the people.

The best way to understand them is to watch them. It’s more useful even than talking to them. Especially for me, because when I talk to people, there’s a 100% chance I’m going to say something fucked up within the first five minutes (more likely in the first two) and ruin the whole dynamic, making the entire conversation about the person trying to understand me rather than the other way around. I have little interest in people understanding me. I am a vessel of the Lord. An imperfect one, but nonetheless, it is the purpose of my existence.

It doesn’t matter who I am.

What matters is my plan.

Wew lads.

Justin Mohn, a 32-year-old Pennsylvania man, decapitated his 68-year-old father, who he believed to be a federal agent, and declared himself leader of the American revolution.

In a video manifesto, filmed at his Levittown home and released on YouTube, he ordered his followers, of whom he has many, to start killing federal agents. During the video, he kept holding up his father’s head, wrapped in plastic, in a bucket.

I watched the video, and he appears to be a QAnon believer. He is very concerned about immigration, and wants to end child sex trafficking. Shockingly, or perhaps not, he claimed his goal is to restore “Judeo-Christian” values.

Just to be clear: he is not a neo-Nazi or a racist, according to his video manifesto, and he only wants to kill federal agents in order to save the economy and stop immigration. He called for “Americans of all races and religions to come together agains the traitorous federal government.”

You can watch the video here. (Note that it has mild gore, in the form of a severed head wrapped in plastic repeatedly held up to punctuate his statements.

He told his alleged followers to spare the military, and called for the military to serve him. He also claims to have $10,000,000 to pay in bounties to kill federal agents.

He further explained that he was authorizing the police and military, under his leadership, to crack down on LGBT, BLM, and Antifa.

The video is 15 minutes long, but it is very repetitive.

He explained that the way he knows that there is no political solution is that he worked at Microsoft and saw that they don’t pay enough taxes. They don’t pay enough taxes, so normal people have to pay for the military.

He also said that unemployment creates homelessness, which creates crime, to fill prisons, so that prisons, lawyers, and courts can make money, and these people are all woke leftists.

His one “racist” statement was that there is an agenda to disenfranchise white men, but went on to immediately say that nonwhites who don’t “toe the line of their social agenda” are also disenfranchised, adding: “so don’t think this has anything to do with race. This is an ideological and spiritual war.”

Immediately after saying that, he made this face:

He did go on a jag about God fighting Satan.

He also claims to have been endorsed by John Hickenlooper and John Kasich, and that he is widely considered the best candidate for president. He said that if it was not for meddling by the FBI, federal courts, and his family, he “could have been the first president unanimously elected by both parties since George Washington.”

He appeared to be on Adderall.

He claims to have been trying to sue Microsoft for tax evasion.

He said that the reason people are meddling with him is that many believe he is the messiah.

He further explained that “this belief that I am the messiah is why you’ve never heard this story on the news – because it would further spread that belief.”

Then he made this face:

However, he clarified that he is not saying he is the messiah, and he would “never compare [himself] to Jesus Christ.” It is simply that so many people believe he is the messiah, that he was betrayed. (Apparently, the FBI and his family believe he may be the messiah.)

Despite claims that he is not claiming to be the messiah, he published a book called “The Second Messiah: King of Earth,” in which he claimed to be the messiah.

He quoted several Bible verses, and I got the impression that he does think he is the messiah.

According to local news site Levitttownnow, Mohn was arrested after 9pm ET on Tuesday in Fort Indiana Gap, Pennsylvania, two hours drive from his home, which he fled after posting the video.

Chief Joe Bartorilla of Middletown Police Department arrived at the Mohn home on Tuesday at 7pm to find the headless father in the bathroom.

Interestingly but not surprisingly, there is no evidence of his father being a federal employee. He owned a cleaning company and a literacy initiative.

You’ll Have That

There is not really any political meaning to this event, though I certainly suspect the media will try to make it out that way. America is a nuthouse, and you have many people like this running around.

This individual just as easily could have gotten into leftist politics, and used that as an explanation as to why he decided to kill his father and declare himself leader of the American militia system.

This country has a lot of problems, and the political problems mentioned by Mohn in the video are really just superficial surface level issues. The real issues are the deep social problems created by the destruction of the traditional social order.

Clearly, this individual would be diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia. However, I’m not entirely sure that this condition is biological, in the way that the medical authorities frame it. In my view, anyone can be driven over the edge by this society, and end up going insane. Probably, a lot more people would be doing this if America did not have a massive drug problem, which blunts insanity. (That is to say, a lot of people who would be prone to going insane become fentanyl addicts instead.)

While watching the video, I could not help but note: living in a house with white walls, white plastic doors, and although not visible in the video, no doubt beige carpet as well, could drive anyone to the point where they start believing they are the messiah and murdering their family members.

He was also a weed smoker, and published a book of poems he wrote while stoned.

Perhaps most disturbing of all, Mohn was trying to start a ska band.

Although this information has been pulled off of social media, I’ve yet to see a clear timeline.

Was he singing ska music at the same time as he was claiming to be the messiah? Or did the failure of his ska band lead him to believe that he was the messiah?

What Will the Media Do??

I wonder if the media is going to play this up as part of “the rising threat of Christianity,” or if they’ll mostly leave it alone?

In general, both sides love it when someone they can identify as their political enemy goes insane and commits some lunatic action. If you look into it, all of these people are motivated by personal derangement, rather than politics. But that doesn’t prevent the right-wing from grandstanding on corpses when a mass shooter turns out to be a tranny, and it probably won’t prevent the left-wing from going buckwild promoting this psychotic patricidal pothead as “A Symbol of Trump’s America.”

The only political angle I see here relates to the kind of society we have allowed to manifest in this country, where people who might have been prone to having mental problems get pushed over the edge. Also, I think it is true that modern high-potency marijuana can induce schizophrenia, and this is something that no one wants to talk about. Before becoming a covid/vax skeptic, Alex Berenson wrote a book entitled “Tell Your Children: The Truth about Marijuana, Mental Illness, and Violence.”

Ultimately, the deal is: there are almost 400,000,000 people in America. Of course, some portion of these people are going to be insane. That’s just statistics.

I see these events relating to the Constitution and rights, and the “do do do do do do do do do” from “Mrs. Robinson” plays in my head.

It’s a Jew bastardization of a children’s lullaby, and that’s what a belief in the Constitution is when the Supreme Court defends gun control.

Chicago Tribune:

For the second time in six months, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday denied a request from gun rights advocates to put a hold on Illinois’ sweeping gun ban, the latest decision coming as the deadline approaches for owners to register prohibited firearms they owned prior to the law’s effective date.

It was the second court setback this week for opponents of the ban on high-powered guns and high-capacity magazines. On Monday, the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago denied a request from the National Association for Gun Rights and a Naperville gun dealer for a review by the full court of November’s ruling by a three-judge panel that kept the gun ban in place.

We’d like to know a little bit about you for our files.

Most of all, you’ve got to hide it from the kids.

You can’t have a gun.

But your kids have to worship satan.

Because of the Constitution.

It is 100% impossible to restrict gun rights based on the US Constitution. “Shall not be infringed” is very straightforward.

There are all kinds of smarmy things I could say about Trump’s “conservative-originalist court picks,” but I don’t even think it’s fair. These are the conservative-originalists from the Federalist Society. They believe in gun control, civil rights, and satanic worship at elementary school.

It really needs to be stressed: the Constitution is inactive, and anyone who cites it – whether to say something you support or something you are against – is being dishonest.

Obviously, you can say “the Constitution says they can’t restrict guns,” but they have been violating the Constitution since the late 19th century and they threw it out completely in the 1960s. So on some level, if you argue your “Constitutional rights,” while knowing that that Constitution has been suspended for decades (at least), you are validating the system which cites the Constitution as the source of its authority and yet has nothing to do with it.

Remember that the Constitutional scholar Alan Dershowitz said the government could force vax you.

All the Constitution did was insure God-given rights, so we have these rights aside from the Constitution. We don’t need to cite the Constitution as the source of these rights. The source is God. The answer to “it’s time for your kids’ satan class” is “no” and the answer to “surrender your weapon” is “come and take it.”

I see these events relating to the Constitution and rights, and the “do do do do do do do do do” from “Mrs. Robinson” plays in my head.

It’s a Jew bastardization of a children’s lullaby, and that’s what a belief in the Constitution is when the Supreme Court defends gun control.

Chicago Tribune:

For the second time in six months, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday denied a request from gun rights advocates to put a hold on Illinois’ sweeping gun ban, the latest decision coming as the deadline approaches for owners to register prohibited firearms they owned prior to the law’s effective date.

It was the second court setback this week for opponents of the ban on high-powered guns and high-capacity magazines. On Monday, the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago denied a request from the National Association for Gun Rights and a Naperville gun dealer for a review by the full court of November’s ruling by a three-judge panel that kept the gun ban in place.

We’d like to know a little bit about you for our files.

Most of all, you’ve got to hide it from the kids.

You can’t have a gun.

But your kids have to worship Satan.

Because of the Constitution.

It is 100% impossible to restrict gun rights based on the US Constitution. “Shall not be infringed” is very straightforward.

There are all kinds of smarmy things I could say about Trump’s “conservative-originalist court picks,” but I don’t even think it’s fair. These are the conservative-originalists from the Federalist Society. They believe in gun control, civil rights, and satanic worship at elementary school.

It really needs to be stressed: the Constitution is inactive, and anyone who cites it – whether to say something you support or something you are against – is being dishonest.

Obviously, you can say “the Constitution says they can’t restrict guns,” but they have been violating the Constitution since the late 19th century and they threw it out completely in the 1960s. So on some level, if you argue your “Constitutional rights,” while knowing that that Constitution has been suspended for decades (at least), you are validating the system which cites the Constitution as the source of its authority and yet has nothing to do with it.

Remember that the Constitutional scholar Alan Dershowitz said that the government could force-vax you.

All the Constitution did was ensure God-given rights, so we have these rights aside from the Constitution. We don’t need to cite the Constitution as the source of these rights. The source is God. The answer to “it’s time for your kids’ Satan class” is “no,” and the answer to “surrender your weapon” is “come and take it.”

Well. This news surprises no one.

The surprising thing is that someone did the study.

RT:

Teenage children of liberal parents are more likely to experience mental health problems, according to a study published Thursday by the Institute of Family Studies and Gallup. Liberal parents have poorer quality relationships with their offspring – the most important influence on a child’s mental development, according to the survey.

Explaining that political ideology is one of the strongest predictors of parenting style, study author Jonathan Rothwell noted that “conservative and very conservative parents are the most likely to adopt the parenting practices associated with adolescent mental health.”

“Liberal parents score the lowest, even worse than very liberal parents, largely because they are the least likely to successfully discipline their children,” the survey found. In contrast, it discovered that conservative parents are more likely to mete out discipline effectively while displaying affection and responding to the child’s needs.

The difference in outcomes was not small, according to the study. Only 55% of the offspring of liberal parents reported good or excellent mental health, compared to 77% of adolescents with conservative or very conservative parents.

A lot of it has to do with authority.

Kids need authority. It’s the only way they feel safe.

Obviously, masculinity in the father makes kids feel safe too, and liberals are anti-masculinity.

Regulation, enforcement, and warm responsiveness were the parenting practices most associated with favorable outcomes. According to the study, parents who agreed their child “must complete the priorities I set for them before they are allowed to play or relax” and “follows a regular routine” on school days saw significantly better results. Daily displays of affection and quickly responding to a child’s needs had similarly weighted effects on mental health.

Conversely, parents who said they found it “difficult to discipline their child” saw a significant negative correlation, as did parents who said the child often gets their way in parent-child conflicts.

Yeah.

While avoiding “adverse experiences” such as parental alcohol or drug abuse, death, or abandonment also had a strong predictive effect, it was dwarfed by how parents and teens reported the quality of the overall relationship. Other substantial influencing factors included how often the teen felt safe and protected and whether they lived with someone who was “frequently angry.”

That would be the mother who would be “frequently angry.” Virtually all of the time.

I guess liberal men are angry a lot too.

Men do have anger, but part of being an adult is learning how to bottle it up and let it rot you out from the inside instead of displaying it publicly. There is nothing more pathetic and feminine than a public display of anger.

For me personally, what really helped was just becoming constantly grumpy. I’m never angry. I’m just always in a morbid state. This is good for the kids, I think. They feel I’m an authority, and they feel protected.

There are also soft spots, of course. Brought to light by alcohol, which is the best way to keep your mood stable.

“I’ll just have 1 beer at the airport before the flight”

17 Beers later:

pic.twitter.com/kIRpuCKiGp

— Barstool Sports (@barstoolsports) September 19, 2023

There is really no society at this point. People have been walking around in pajama pants for years now, it’s sort of the obvious next step that people just wouldn’t bother to put on clothes at all.

New York Post:

A naked man was detained on Monday after air travelers spotted him proudly sauntering through Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport.

Eye-popping video shows the man — without any baggage in sight or a stitch of clothing — slowly strolling past a TGIF Friday around 10:15 p.m. inside the airport’s Terminal C, which exclusively flies out American Airlines flights.

An astonished passerby did a double-take after walking past the unabashed man, who didn’t pay any mind to the deranged stares aimed in his direction.

“There’s a naked guy in the airport,” another man filming the strange encounter can be heard saying as someone nearby begs him not to record the stranger.

The nude man immediately swings his head at the camera, points his finger, and begins nodding his head.

“Yes, there is!” the videographer cheers, offering a pointed finger back.

“My man!”

I don’t even really blame the guy.

Society hasn’t done anything for me lately. Or really ever. I don’t feel I owe it much. Or really anything.

What’s the point of putting on clothes if you don’t feel like it? Who do you owe it to to wear clothes?

The Jews and immigrants? The women who control everything?

I don’t owe these people.

Moving forward, I might just go around nude. Buying and wearing clothing is a burden that I don’t really have the tolerance for anymore.

Conservative white men all have this idea that society is on their backs and they’re the ones holding it together. Well, that part is true. But they have this idea that they have a duty to do that. But it’s a duty to whom?

What exactly are you getting out of maintaining the illusion that we live in a society? You’re basically getting nothing but hassle and punishment.

In the video, the guy recording yells at the nude stroller: “my man.” This is a way of communicating: “yeah, that guy’s right – fuck everything. Who cares?”

If someone can come up with a good reason not to walk around in the nude, I’d like to hear it.