Haha.

I guess they didn’t like this bitch too much.

Looking at her, I don’t blame them.

New York Post:

A 19-year-old San Francisco man has been charged in the death of a popular baker who was dragged by a getaway car chasing after armed robbers — and the woke activist’s family has urged authorities not to jail her two assailants because it goes against her social justice beliefs.

Ishmael Burch was charged June 5 by the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office in Oakland on suspicion of felony murder with robbery enhancements in the slaying of Jen Angel, owner of Angel Cakes, the San Francisco Examiner reported.

The suspect was first taken into custody in San Francisco on June 2 on battery charges.

Police confirmed Saturday that Burch was charged in connection with the Feb. 6 death of Angel, 48, who was robbed by two thieves who smashed her car window on Webster Street in Oakland and made off with her purse.

She chased after their getaway car, but got caught in the vehicle’s door and was dragged more the 50 feet, smashing her head on the sidewalk. She was put in a medically induced coma and later declared dead.

Ishmael Burch is a good boy who just happened to be oppressed for no reason

“As a long-time social movement activist and anarchist, Jen did not believe in state violence, carceral punishment or incarceration as an effective or just solution to social violence and inequity,” her loved ones wrote on a GoFundMe page after the brutal crime.

Her family is “committed to pursuing all available alternatives to traditional prosecution, such as restorative justice,” the post said.

“We know Jen would not want to continue the cycle of harm by bringing state-sanctioned violence to those involved in her death or to other members of Oakland’s rich community,” the family added.

In the wake of Burch’s arrest, Angel’s friends and family reiterated her “commitment to restorative and transformative justice.”

“The community that Jen built and surrounded herself with was vast. The group of us working to carry out her wishes reflect a variety of life experiences. Some of us share Jen’s political beliefs and ideals. Some of us are newer to alternatives to the status quo,” the statement reads, the Mercury News reported.

And nothing of value was lost

“Others of us may make very different decisions on our own behalf than what Jen believed in. Among all of us, no matter where we stand individually, collectively we are committed to ensuring that harm is not done in Jen’s name. We are committed to working together to uphold the values Jen lived for,” it says.

“Jen lived her full and vibrant life with the understanding that the potential for a healthy and just society depends on replacing racist and violent institutions like policing, jails, and prisons with models of public safety that actually keep everyone safe,” it continues. “This case is an opportunity for Alameda County to not only honor the wishes of Jen and her loved ones, but also to model a framework that seeks to address the root causes of harmful behavior and find meaningful ways to ensure true justice in our communities.”

Emily Harris, an anti-prison director and one of Angel’s friends, has told the San Francisco Chronicle that the baker was her first political mentor and believed that using prison to punish people prevented both victims and criminals from actually healing.

Locking up those responsible for Angel’s death would only “perpetuate more harm,” Harris told the paper.

“That doesn’t mean that there isn’t accountability that we would want for (the perpetrators),” she said. “What (that) could look like isn’t about putting a person into further harm … (but) understanding how we’re going to prevent this from happening to the next Jen Angel.”

We are on the way to a utopia, folks.

Soon, blacks will never be punished for anything at all.

It’s going to be a black utopia!

JUST IN – UK academics at almost 100 universities are being trained in "effectively canceling" others in the name of "social and racial justice".https://t.co/CdenSpihGw

— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) June 12, 2022

Yeah, censorship works.

I don’t know why someone would need a study to prove that.

The problem is, that it only works for a while. Censorship is an act of desperation, like doing fentanyl. If you’re really having a bad life and you start doing fentanyl, you’re going to feel a lot better for a while. But fentanyl addiction is not a valid life strategy. Censorship is not a valid method of governance.

The Telegraph:

Cancel culture has “benefits”, academics at almost 100 UK universities have been told as part of an anti-racism course.

The Open University has devised a training programme titled Union Black, backed by £500,000 of Santander investment, which offers teaching staff lessons including “white people have a responsibility to solve the problem of racism”.

Academics taking the course are urged to become “active allies” in advancing racial justice, course materials reveal, and taught about the advantages of “cancelling” people and institutions.

Material in one online module states: “In relation to racial/social justice, cancel culture has been shown to realise benefits.”

Examples of these benefits in the material include “holding people or entities accountable for immoral or unacceptable behaviour” and “promoting collective action to achieve social justice and cultural change through social pressure”.

Course documents also add “motivating allies to reveal themselves”, as an advantage, along with “mobilising public opinion and sharing collective expressions of moral outrage”.

The documents urge “due diligence before effectively ‘cancelling’ someone”, which is an act of making an individual a pariah – often through social media pressure and sometimes to the point of people losing their jobs – that has become a growing issue in academia.

Kathleen Stock lost her role at the University of Sussex amid a social media storm over her comments on transgender issues.

…

The Union Black course, launched in 2021, has been taken up by select academics and students in around 90 UK universities, including Leeds, Liverpool, Bristol, and Imperial College London.

Those taking the online course are offered insights on black history, race relations, unconscious bias, and “whiteness”.

Course material – drawn up by anonymous Open University contributors – states that “we still live in a racist society”, adding that “the black/white dynamic and structural racism” play a significant role in “all areas of modern life in western nations”.

It further claims that “white people have a responsibility to solve the problem of racism”, urging those taking the voluntary course to rate how active they are as “allies” in this struggle, with being “non-racist” deemed “not enough”.

Teaching staff and students taking the course are invited to sign a declaration of intent at the close of the course, in which they can acknowledge that “systemic racism is deeply entrenched in society”, and “racism may have influenced what I am being taught and what I am teaching”.

Using the chilling effect to make people afraid to speak their mind will keep people from talking against you. This is true. But you can’t keep people in a constant state of oppression and fear. It just does not work. Eventually the pressure bottles up and it eventually pops. The more aggressive the repression, the quicker it is going to pop.

Does this mean they’re going to drop the “tolerant” bullsh*t and just admit they’re bigots?

— FyourPolitics (@FyourPolitics) June 12, 2022

pic.twitter.com/4a5cxHNGMq

— Udstødt 🖤 (@Utfryst_) June 12, 2022

pic.twitter.com/Z1OBNNU63a

— me (@mweaston) June 12, 2022

https://t.co/UwGtUw9ckr

— Akeru (@erocKBX79) June 12, 2022

These people want to destroy you for simply having a different opinion

— 1TH5:5 _ ‘Let them take arms’ (@BooBoo_Thiccums) June 12, 2022

pic.twitter.com/mPELLoqvMP

— Lee ©️ (@leeroden7) June 12, 2022

what the fuck has this world come to

— sicario (@viralSatan) June 12, 2022

Cry bully training. Totally insane.

— J.D. Haltigan, PhD 🏒👨‍💻 (@JDHaltigan) June 12, 2022

Leftism has destroyed everything from the inside out. Total chaos, division, and confusion is the point. They must break down all things that unite people…traditional families, communities, religion, national pride, and being a good neighbor. Anxiety and victims want a savior.

— 🇺🇸Ultra MAGA Agenda🇺🇸 (@DemocratPlague) June 12, 2022

When an official institution of the British government tells you you’re too woke, you have serious issues.

Daily Mail:

Britain’s most expensive private day school has been downgraded by Ofsted for imposing a ‘woke’ agenda on the curriculum.

The £32,600-a-year American School in London (ASL) is now rated ‘requires improvement’ because of ‘failures’ in education and leadership.

A damning report found it placed more weight on teaching ‘social justice’ than on learning ‘subject-specific knowledge and skills’.

Meanwhile some pupils felt their views were ‘suppressed’ in lessons.

Because of this, the school failed a number of Independent School Standards, which ban the ‘promotion of partisan political views’ and demand ‘respect for those with other beliefs’.

Inspectors visited the previously outstanding-rated school in December after parents complained pupils were being ‘indoctrinated’.

Families said non-white pupils had been recruited to ‘discriminatory’ affinity groups for after-school clubs and children were taught about ‘white fragility’.

Former head Robin Appleby, who introduced the agenda, resigned in November, saying she wanted to ‘focus on her own wellbeing’.

Robin Appleby

Ofsted’s report, due to be published shortly, said: ‘Teaching places much more weight on the school’s approach to social justice than on learning subject-specific knowledge and skills.’ It added: ‘Not everyone felt that they are able to express their views freely in class.’

Ofsted said that in the lower school curriculum for social studies, pupils ‘spend much time repeatedly considering identity (including analysing their own characteristics) rather than learning, for example, geographical knowledge.’

In middle school, pupils were having to focus on ‘social issues’ rather than ‘skills’ in subjects such as English.

The report concluded: ‘While recognising the importance of promoting equalities, a significant minority of parents and pupils told inspectors that a culture has developed where alternative opinions are not felt welcome.’

Last night, a current parent said: ‘As the report shows, teachers have been indoctrinating students with extreme, partisan views, academic teaching has been shoved out of the way by excessive teaching about ‘social justice’, and most students are afraid to express their views in class.’

That’s the microcosm of the entire Western world.

Everyone is being bullied into silence by a small mob of screeching women, homosexuals, and Jews.

Kamala Harris is already apparently functioning as a kind of shadow president.

To be fair, it would be sort of offensive to have a senile old man calling up world leaders. If you’ve ever talked to a senile old person on the phone, you know it is impossible to get them to hang up. Most world leaders don’t really have time for that.

New York Post:

Vice President Kamala Harris on Monday held her second call with a foreign leader — speaking with French President Emmanuel Macron after a talk earlier this month with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, as well as with World Health Organization Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus in January.

The calls boost the vice president’s role in diplomacy. Former Vice President Mike Pence occasionally spoke directly by phone with foreign leaders, but that role generally was performed by former President Donald Trump, especially last year.

A review of press notices from Pence’s final year in office reveals no readouts of direct calls with the leaders of foreign nations.

Harris expressed to Macron “her commitment to strengthening bilateral ties between the United States and France and to revitalizing the transatlantic alliance,” according to a readout from her office.

Harris and Macron “agreed on the need for close bilateral and multilateral cooperation to address COVID-19, climate change, and support democracy at home and around the world,” according to the readout.

“They also discussed numerous regional challenges, including those in the Middle East and Africa, and the need to confront them together. The Vice President thanked President Macron for his leadership on the issue of gender equality and for France’s contribution to NASA’s Mars 2020 Perseverance rover,” the release said.

It always cracks me up when the social justice stuff is mentioned alongside stuff to do with space travel.

It really puts things into perspective.

I don’t think anyone legitimately believes that obese black women, transsexuals and Somalian refugees are going to colonize Mars.

Lining the two issues up next to each other highlights a cognitive dissonance.

No one believes social justice is compatible with our the visions for the future we had up through the 2000s.

Every time space travel is mentioned alongside social justice, people are forced to attempt to reconcile the fact that we’ve sacrificed our previous vision for the future, exchanging it for something else. Then, they have to ask what that “something else” is.

Where exactly is this current path supposed to be leading us?

Once all white men are replaced with blacks, women and transsexuals, what is society going to look like?

If we’ve given up on this idea of technological advancement leading to a space empire, and replaced it with a program of punishment of white men, then once every white man is punished, what will be left to do?

The answer within the ideology is that destroying white men is an end in itself – there is no other goal, there is no vision of the future beyond this punitive agenda.

Justice isn’t justice as you know it anymore.

It’s now “social justice.”

That is what Joe Biden’s judges will enforce.

You really don’t hardly even have a chance of getting a fair trial in this country, and the Biden Justice Department is arresting people for memes.

The Hill:

A growing number of federal judges have announced their departures in the weeks since President Biden was sworn in, giving the new administration an early opportunity to start making inroads into former President Trump’s success at filling the judiciary with conservative judges.

There are currently 57 vacancies in the federal district and appellate courts and another 20 seats that will become vacant in the coming months. At least 25 of those vacancies were announced after Biden’s inauguration on Jan. 20.

The group of departures includes Emmet Sullivan, who was appointed to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by former President Clinton in 1994. Sullivan presided over several high-profile cases during the Trump era, including the prosecution of Michael Flynn on charges that the former White House national security adviser had lied to the FBI about his conversations with a Russian diplomat during Trump’s transition period.

Another Clinton-appointed judge, Robert Katzmann of the influential 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, announced on Jan. 21 that he would be leaving his seat. Katzmann was also involved in a number of Trump-related cases. Last year, he was part of a three-judge panel that sided with the Manhattan district attorney’s office in a lawsuit Trump filed seeking to block the prosecutor’s subpoena for his tax returns.

Both Katzmann and Sullivan will be taking senior status, which allows them to stay on as judges with a lighter case load while leaving seats for Biden to fill through the Senate confirmation process.

“I think that he already, right off the bat, has an incredible opportunity to improve the cause of justice, that he has a tremendous opportunity to leave his mark by getting on the bench remarkable jurists who are both demographically and professionally diverse and with a demonstrated commitment to equal justice in this country,” said Daniel Goldberg, legal director of the progressive group Alliance for Justice.

Daniel Goldberg should have to call his group “Jews for Justice for the Goyim” – because that’s what it is.

Have you started to understand the yellow star concept, as a way to identify these people?

Do you think a Jew lawyer wants you to get “justice” in the typical sense that you think of when you hear the word “justice”? His definition of “justice” is Black Lives Matter police shooting hoaxes, rape hoaxes, political speech libel hoaxes, immigration asylum hoaxes, and so on.

This is his justice:

The Jews literally committed deicide, and they celebrate that to this day as an act of “justice.” Never forget that: every Jew wakes up every morning and defines himself by the murder of Christ. That is what it means to be a Jew.

It is absurd to have these people speaking of “justice,” and what you are going to get is going to be more in line with the murder of Christ than it is with standard American ideals of fair treatment under the law.

Remember: these people have openly said that they want to use the legal system as a way to create “equity” between the races. That means that you, as a normal, heterosexual white male, are lesser in the eyes of this Jewish justice system than anyone else on earth.

The singer Adele has lost weight, and the lunatic feminist and Jewish commentariat doesn’t know how to deal with it.

Adele is famous for such songs as… the one that says “I’m in California dreaming of who we used to be” that has been stuck in your head at least 7000 times if you’re the kind of person who visits normie coffee shops. (These studio-produced singles are literally created using scientific methods to figure out what will get stuck in your head.) But she was perhaps more famous for being a fat slob.

People who live in reality understand that being fat is extremely unhealthy. People understand that fundamentally, as you can simply look at these people, and see the trouble they have moving, the strained breathing, the tiredness. You can also usually smell them, given that someone who is obese as Adele was oozes vile hormones from her pores. So the natural reaction to someone losing weight is to say “great job, you must feel so much better.” Especially with a woman, but with a man as well, there is also the immediate reaction of “you look so much better.” Because everyone knows that it is just a biological fact that fat people are visually unattractive, and actually repulsive.

Adele does in fact look great, and I’m proud of her for losing this weight. She has added at least a decade onto her life expectancy, and she can also now be a much better role model for young girls.

I was opposed to her being promoted in the media, due to her weight, primarily because it was sending the message to young girls that it is okay to be a gross pig. I don’t think that was ever her personal goal, but it was a de facto reality of making a fat woman a celebrity. And the lunatic Jews and feminists in the media played this up, claiming that she was “healthy and beautiful,” despite the fact that everyone knows both those things are patently untrue.

This could be a happy story if Adele came out now and explained that even after the weight loss, she will suffer for the rest of her life for the choices she made to not control her diet and to not exercise during her 20s. Most of those problems will be internal, but some of these problems are visible.

In this photograph, you can see that her breasts are like tube socks, given that they have so much extra skin:

A human losing as much weight as Adele lost is a bit like popping a zit. Her stomach is I’m sure an absolute disaster.

People should know that it isn’t as simple as just going to a £295 an hour hypnotherapist and dropping the pounds. Regardless of how she chooses to publicly address the issue, it’s a positive development for all of society that she’s made this decision.

The Jewish and feminist media however do not think so. These people are actually complaining that she lost weight, and attacking her for it. They are saying that to give her compliments for what I’m sure was a Herculean task is “fatphobia.” Because by saying it is a good thing that she lost weight, that she is now 1000x more attractive and 1000x more healthy, you are acknowledging that being fat is unhealthy and unattractive, and that is an act of pure hatred for the circumference of the waist.

The claim is that Adele is a woman, so she’s allowed to do whatever she wants, and maybe she wanted to lose the weight, but we shouldn’t acknowledge that she lost the weight.

Schrodinger's psychoanalysis. We can't talk about Adele losing weight, but we also have to. https://t.co/WwZRas3vqJ

— 🇸🇴 RWDS Team Leader 🇸🇴 (@ShutItDownGoy) May 7, 2020

The Independent, which has become a Buzzfeed-tier joke paper, has published a piece claiming that no one has a right to encourage people to lose weight. The article highlights a number of tweets which communicate this idea. These tweets are probably more useful than pro-fat articles themselves, which use bizarre, confusing and contradictory language, in order to send a message that cannot be stated in straightforward language without sounding insane.

The tweets are the unfiltered ideas of the kinds of people who digest the messages of the media and adopt them as their own beliefs, and aren’t worried about sounding insane because they think this is acceptable because the media said it was.

please stop saying Adele had a “glow up” we have no idea what her health was/is like and this is just reinforcing the “skinny ideal” or the concept that the skinnier you get the prettier you get

— Audrey 🍍 (@almostfuckingdo) May 6, 2020

praising Adele’s weight loss as a character or moral improvement is not something I will to listen to. The fatphobic attitude is not ok. Women (people) don’t need to upgrade by losing weight and it’s not an indicator of happiness. https://t.co/1F3aakvSXR

— vivalassveagas (@captnoshame) May 6, 2020

everybody suddenly saying adele looks amazing is fatphobic 🙂 every single one of y'all. every one

— a dance move you can get behind (@gonegirlls) May 6, 2020

full offense but the way everyone reacts to adele's weight loss is weird. she was beautiful before, you guys are just fatphobic

— sarah (@Iauraroslin) May 6, 2020

Fellow thins, don’t be fatphobic. I see you tweeting about Adele.

Fat people can see you tweeting about Adele too.

— Blair Imani (@BlairImani) May 6, 2020

it is fatphobic to applaud or congratulate adele, who has said nothing publicly about it, for her weight loss. you do not and cannot know her relationship with her body – so it is really loathsome to define her losing weight as a kind of moral, psychological or aesthetic triumph.

— ben (@benvyle) December 24, 2019

Adele has always been beautiful but twitter only decides to notice when she’s lost weight. yeah okay society is definitely not fatphobic 🥴🥴 uh huh sure

— 𝚗𝚊𝚝 🍑 check pinned! (@paradisepadilla) December 24, 2019

Adele loses weight and suddenly everyone’s wetting themselves over her looks. Adele’s always been that bitch and you’re all just fatphobic x https://t.co/gtClABYBeT

— jess (@httpj3ss) December 24, 2019

I am feeling extremely smug right now, reading these kinds of lunatic social justice messages, because I know that this program has reached the end of the line. The fact that the people don’t know it’s reached the end of the line, because they are stupid or in denial about what has happened to the world as a result of this lockdown, bolsters my smugness by orders of magnitude.

We are entering into a situation where people are going to be worried about where their next meal is coming from. They are going to be worried about how they are going to remain in their homes. They are going to be worried about getting the most basic medical care.

In fact, that world is already here. People are locked in their houses, with all of their entertainment media and consumer products, and the government has thus far kept things afloat by keeping the grocery stores open, sending people unemployment checks and telling landlords not to evict. But the meat shortages are here. The mass layoffs are here. This stuff is going to soon be felt by everyone, whether we’re locked in our houses or not, and it will shortly set in that nothing is ever going back to normal.

“Fatphobia” is a luxury problem, just like transphobia, homophobia and racism. These are problems that people invent when they don’t have any other problems. When reality hits, all of this is going to disappear, like Thanos had snapped his fingers.

This is obvious. And it is hilarious. Seeing all of these horrible social justice people realize that their entire world has collapsed, and that nothing they cared about matters anymore, seeing them realize that it was all just vapid nonsense that could only be possible in the most materially abundant society in all of human history, is going to be glorious.

I simply cannot wait to see their tweets and their videos as they transition from being worried about invisible Nazis hiding under their beds to realizing that they don’t have any food and they’re getting thrown out of their apartments. It will be especially satisfying to see them make claims about racism and transphobia and fatphobia and everything else, demanding that people rush to meet their needs like they always did before, and then realize that no one is coming to pamper them.

There are going to be a lot of suicides. Each one will be like an angel kissing my forehead.

Others will die due to the collapse of the healthcare system. We’re going to end up with a fully socialized medicine system, where the government just pays for everything, and they’re not going to pay for tranny care. Basic healthcare will be difficult to get, and many fat people with chronic problems will die.

The chickens are coming home to roost with bombs strapped to their chests and the primary casualties are going to be the lunatics who created this situation in the first place. The people who cheered the government shutting the entire society because they were afraid of the flu.

Nothing will stop me from savoring all of this, and I do hope that you get to savor it too.

But we must remember that hell is coming down on our heads as well.

Our Problems Were Also Luxury Problems

We are obviously better prepared for it than people who talk about fatphobia, but we have to acknowledge: our problems were luxury problems as well.

Our issues were more relevant, as they pointed to a future disaster. That disaster is now here. It might not have been immigration or homosexuality or fat people that caused it, but it was the kind of society that allows for this sort of thinking that caused it.

When you have a society that believes in things like “fatphobia,” you have a society that is so divorced from basic reality that it is only a matter of time before the whole thing pops, and all of the imaginary problems, the imaginary people who prized these problems, spit out like pus from a zit. The same people that believe in fatphobia are the people who believe the flu is a reason to shut down the entire economy. They are so far separated from real life problems that they can’t even fathom that real life problems could ever exist, and so they do not make decisions based on the fact that those decisions could cause a disaster that would cause them to lose everything they care about.

We failed to stop these people, to cut this kind of insanity out of the popular mind, and the disaster happened.

We need to recalibrate ourselves and our own political movement to address this new situation we find ourselves in, and we need to do it quickly.

Holy shit. This is epic.

Remember a few months back, we published an article discussing the release of a study where some feminist nutjob claimed to have fondled the genitals of 10,000 dogs in order to prove that gay dogs were oppressed or some shit.

Actually, go back and read that article – it was pretty funny.

We later reported that the author of that paper apparently had faked her PhD.

But as it turns out, the story doesn’t end there.

The paper was actually part of a big project meant to expose how insane these Jew academic papers are. In other words, it was purposely designed to be as ridiculous as possible, and yet it was still published without question.

Wew.

Wall Street Journal:

The existence of a monthly journal focused on “feminist geography” is a sign of something gone awry in academia. The journal in question—Gender, Place & Culture—published a paper online in May whose author claimed to have spent a year observing canine sexual misconduct in Portland, Ore., parks.

We must fight dog rape culture, lol.

The author admits that “my own anthropocentric frame” makes it difficult to judge animal consent. Still, the paper claims dog parks are “petri dishes for canine ‘rape culture’ ” and issues “a call for awareness into the different ways dogs are treated on the basis of their gender and queering behaviors, and the chronic and perennial rape emergency dog parks pose to female dogs.”

I never suspected that this paper was a hoax, because I’ve grown to expect this level of insanity from the left.

And I’m right to expect it, because the actual publishing of the paper was entirely legitimate – the journal didn’t think this study seemed absurd at all.

The paper was ridiculous enough to pique my interest—and rouse my skepticism, which grew in July with a report in Campus Reform by Toni Airaksinen. Author Helen Wilson had claimed to have a doctorate in feminist studies, but “none of the institutions that offers such a degree could confirm that she had graduated from their program,” Ms. Airaksinen wrote. In August Gender, Place & Culture issued an “expression of concern” admitting it couldn’t verify Ms. Wilson’s identity, though it kept the paper on its website.

All of this prompted me to ask my own questions. My email to “Helen Wilson” was answered by James Lindsay, a math doctorate and one of the real co-authors of the dog-park study. Gender, Place & Culture had been duped, he admitted. So had half a dozen other prominent journals that accepted fake papers by Mr. Lindsay and his collaborators—Peter Boghossian, an assistant professor of philosophy at Portland State University, and Helen Pluckrose, a London-based scholar of English literature and history and editor of AreoMagazine.com.

The three academics call themselves “left-leaning liberals.” Yet they’re dismayed by what they describe as a “grievance studies” takeover of academia, especially its encroachment into the sciences. “I think that certain aspects of knowledge production in the United States have been corrupted,” Mr. Boghossian says. Anyone who questions research on identity, privilege and oppression risks accusations of bigotry.

You don’t say…

That it took these academics all this time to realize that the social sciences were “corrupted” just shows how disconnected from reality these people are.

Then again, calling yourself “left leaning liberals” even after witnessing this Jewed-out reality means they’re probably high on the shitlib koolaid themselves to a large extent.

That even these people are dumbfounded by the current state of academia is a testament to how bad things really are.

Beginning in August 2017, the trio wrote 20 hoax papers, submitting them to peer-reviewed journals under a variety of pseudonyms, as well as the name of their friend Richard Baldwin, a professor emeritus at Florida’s Gulf Coast State College. Mr. Baldwin confirms he gave them permission use his name. Journals accepted seven hoax papers. Four have been published.

Mind blowing stupidity.

One of the trio’s hoax papers, published in April by the journal Fat Studies, claims bodybuilding is “fat-exclusionary” and proposes “a new classification . . . termed fat bodybuilding, as a fat-inclusive politicized performance.” Editor Esther Rothblum said the paper had gone through peer review, and the author signed a copyright form verifying authorship of the article. “This author put a lot of work into this topic,” she said. “It is an interesting topic, looking at weight and bodybuilding. So I am surprised that, of all things, they’d write this as a hoax. As you can imagine, this is a very serious charge.” She plans to remove the paper from the Fat Studies website.

A hoax paper for the Journal of Poetry Therapy describes monthly feminist spirituality meetings, complete with a “womb room,” and discusses six poems, which Mr. Lindsay generated by algorithm and lightly edited. Founding editor Nicholas Mazza said the article went through blind peer review and revisions before its acceptance in July, but he regrets not doing more to verify the author’s identity. He added that it took years to build credibility and get the Journal of Poetry Therapy listed in major scholarly databases. “You work so hard, and you get something like this,” he said. Still, “I can see how editors like me and journals can be duped.”

Affilia, a peer-reviewed journal of women and social work, formally accepted the trio’s hoax paper, “Our Struggle Is My Struggle: Solidarity Feminism as an Intersectional Reply to Neoliberal and Choice Feminism.” The second portion of the paper is a rewrite of a chapter from “Mein Kampf.” Affilia’s editors declined to comment.

Lol. “Jewish communists are the real Nazis.”

The trio say they’ve proved that higher ed’s fixation on identity politics enables “absurd and horrific” scholarship. Their submissions were outlandish—but no more so, they insist, than others written in earnest and published by these journals.

Yeah, and this isn’t the first time academic journals have been conned with hoax papers, too. Alan Sokal did something similar in the 90s. But back then, it was the ridiculous “post-modernists” that were mocked.

This is one of the first time the Jew “social justice” crowd is humiliated with such a monumental expose of their intellectually bankrupt “scholarship.”

Whenever leftists claim that “they have science on their side,” never forget that these kinds of clown papers are what they’re referring to. It’s all Jewish hoax “science.” Totally devoid of scientific merit, or even intellectual rigor – the only criteria for acceptance is that the “research” is damaging to White civilization.

I was unaware of this fact, but last season the Simpsons did a bit mocking university SJWs.

The Simpsons was never South Park. It’s not edgy social commentary. If you’re getting aggressively mocked by the Simpsons, you’re already despised by the mainstream.

The best part is when the cuck says to Mr. Burns “you’re worse than Hitler” and he replies “it’s too late for flattery.” That is genuinely funny.

But the whole clip is funny.

I think the left realizes that it is going way too far, and is now consciously trying to put the brakes on some of the crazy.

But they can’t.

It’s already too late.

They are locked into a purity spiral, and next comes sex with animals and children.

With the rapid progress they’ve made with the trannies, they’re going to have to start pushing one or the other pretty soon.

They might do incest first.

Our culture is under attack.

We have what is supposed to be one of the greatest universities in the world telling its students not to read one of the greatest writers of all history because they are too childish to deal with it.

Universities in the current year are a joke.

Negro Felon League Commissioner Roger Goodell is a newly minted social justice warrior!

The Negro Felon League just held a meeting with the Union representing the players. Usually nobody cares about these types of meetings but with the national anthem controversy swirling, this meeting has drawn much more attention.

The league has tried to take the middle road. They want players to stand for the anthem, but are refusing to make it a requirement. It is literally the worst approach they could have taken to maintain the league’s viability. They’ve managed to anger all sides by doing this.

It does look as if they are capitulating to the players though. One of the main issues discussed at the meeting was how they could help raise awareness for social justice issues.

USA Today:

Progress but no resolution. That was the outcome Tuesday when the NFL hosted a summit of players, franchise owners and league and union executives to discuss the ongoing push for social justice issues and the protests players have taken to spread awareness for those causes. 

Amid controversy regarding the future of the protests, many involved said they found the discussion useful.

“I’m not sure we’re close to a resolution, but conversations are ongoing,” said Philadelphia Eagles safety Malcolm Jenkins. “It went from just phone calls to obviously, this is the first time meeting, so I don’t think we can come up with a whole plan and solutions in two hours. But we’re happy that these things are happening, and we look forward to the opportunity to be able to put a good plan together.”

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said the league did not seek a commitment from players to stand for the anthem.

“We spent today talking about the issues that players have been trying to bring attention to — issues to make our communities better,” Goodell said. “I think we all agree that there’s nothing more important than trying to give back to our communities and make them better.”

So basically the league is going to allow these monkeys to keep disrespecting the anthem and the flag. They’re also going to promote awareness for social justice causes which is just code for niggerism. The league seems to think that this will help clamp down on the protests. They are mistaken to think this. These apes are not going to stop with their antics until they face consequences.

At this rate, the NFL will be lucky to fill a fraction of the stadium seats for their games. Who the hell wants to watch a bunch of overpaid monkeys chase after a football if the highlight of the show is hate for America and lectures on social justice issues? The Negro fatigue is off the charts with this.

Piling on to the Negro fatigue was the presence of Negro protesters around the meeting itself. One Negro confronted Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones claiming that he was treating his players like $40 million slaves. He also ranted about White supremacy, Donald Trump and other nonsense. It was a bunch of incoherent nigger babble.

All of this nonsense is really taking its toll. Not only are we seeing half empty stadiums, but ratings for the games are continuing to plunge. The recent Monday Night Football game had its lowest rating of the season. It’s gotten so bad that the broadcasters are avoiding airing the national anthem.

This whole thing is like watching a slow motion train wreck – but a train wreck that is much needed. When the NFL loses all of its remaining cultural influence, the country will be in a much better place. There’s far more important things that deserve our focus than this niggerball garbage.