I don’t know what this filthy whore is complaining about – in an Egyptian prison, she’s sure to get plenty of that brown cock she craves!

Dirty slut!

Fox News:

A British woman sentenced to three years in prison for smuggling painkillers into Egypt claims she didn’t know they were illegal and she was only trying to help her boyfriend.

Laura Plummer, 33, was arrested in October at Hurghada International Airport after being found with 290 tramadol pills in her suitcase that she claimed were for her Egyptian boyfriend’s bad back.

Her lawyers have reportedly lodged an immediate repeal.

Speaking after the verdict, Plummer’s mother Roberta told the Sun: “This is not fair. She’s done it in all innocence. She brought [the drugs] to help someone, to help a family.

“She’s the kindest person… I was worried about her before, [when she was] in the police station. I’m even more worried now she’s in actual prison with real criminals.”

Plummer’s Egyptian partner Omar Caboo, who she reportedly visits a few times per year, suffers from severe back pain.

She had her trial adjourned yesterday after accidentally pleading guilty due to a mix-up with her interpreter.

Maybe globo-skankdom will finally learn it’s lesson!

No… no, I don’t suppose so.

This poor widdle baby.

Can you imagine her feewings?

She has $5 million, by the way. From doing porno and also from having sex with Charlie Sheen.

Many believe the widespread fairy tale that women enjoy making porn movies but in reality there are no happy endings for the women of porn.

A closer look at Bree Olson​’s untold, captivating story will show you several reasons why.

Today, female porn stars who get work elsewhere can be fired if their past comes out — and there’s no legal recourse. Female porn stars are human beings. They should be respected, not discriminated against. It’s a shame that female porn stars are disgraced for something they do, whether society accepts their profession or not.

Yes, right, we all probably know that pornography does not seem like a place where one could enrich their sense of self-worth or self-respect, but, self-respect is defined as how one regards one’s self – no one else can determine this for Bree Olson. We all have different experiences when it comes to discovering our self-worth. Even if it is unconventional, there is no wrong way to cultivate your own sense of self. No one can determine your self-worth, but you.

People outside porn usually have a different perspective about sex workers and people justify their judgement and perspective especially when sex workers like Bree Olson regret what they did after retiring from porn. However, no one is allowed to discriminate a human being, to cyberbully them, to curse them, to humiliate them or to segregate them but themselves. Bree Olson chose to speak up because she is a human being, she is a woman, and she is simply tired of being shunned by society.

So, why do female porn stars like Bree Olson lose respect in society and have to suffer?
Why we glorify power and violence, and demolish porn and sex?

This double standard grates us — go out and kill people for a living and you’re seen as a hero soldier, have sex in front of a camera, you’re seen as a b**** or with no self-worth, or someone who deserves to be hated and humiliated. Why? Who are we to decide who is worth what?

We know it might seem like an odd comparison, but soldiers are seen as heroes in most countries, even if they fought in unethical wars or committed atrocities, but female porn stars are looked down upon as the dregs of society, and if you think about it, only one of the two groups have done morally abhorrent things, and it’s generally not the female porn stars.

We have to love and respect each other. And Bree Olson deserves to be treated like any of us.

Slutty girls across Canada are getting kicked out of school for dressing like whores, and the liberal establishment is screaming that we need to “educate” boys not to be distracted by half-naked women.

National Post:

A Labrador high school is under fire after sending home more than two dozen students for sporting bare shoulders, allegedly because it would “distract” male students, as a tug-of-war against dress codes grows in schools across the country.

“I was in class for maybe 10 minutes, and when I got out of my desk the teacher looked at me and told me — in front of all the students — that I should go to the office,” said Maddie Pynn, a Grade 11 student at Menihek High School whose dress was deemed to be too short, despite her wearing shorts underneath.

After changing into a longer dress, she said she returned only to be sent home again for excessive perfume.

Ms. Pynn was ultimately one of between 20 and 30 students sent home as part of a Wednesday crackdown on revealing clothing.

…

And although the policy is outwardly gender neutral, several Menihek students claim they were explicitly told that their bare shoulders would invite unneeded attention from male students.

“I’ve heard teachers say that [the dress code exists] because teenage boys will be boys; it’s a distraction to males,” said Ms. Pynn.

Obviously, girls dress sexy for the purpose of getting attention from men. This is simply a blatant and clear reality that does not need to be further elaborated on in any way. It is a “the sky is blue” type thing. A self-evident fact.

Ah, but the Jew-ridden liberal establishment has never been into obvious facts. These rats, when addressing this vain behavior from women, refuse to acknowledge vanity and attention-whoring as the cause, and instead say that women dress this way because it is hot outside, and that if men look at their exposed flesh and become distracted, that is somehow the fault of the men.

Because apparently, a man should be able to moralize his way out of his eyes being drawn to a woman’s exposed flesh. Because basic human biology is a social construct. Or… whatever.

“Boys will be boys” is a good phrase to use here, because it addresses the fact that being drawn to women physically is part of the very nature of the male. As I have said before, men and women both have weaknesses – one of a woman’s weaknesses is physical strength, while one of a man’s weaknesses is visual sexual stimulation. A woman using skimpy clothes to influence men is like a man using the strength of his arms to influence women.

That is fair and equal, isn’t it? Men and women are different, they have different biological functions, and they should respect each other.

Oh, but no. The woman must be put above the man.

Think Progress – a liberal site which is basically a poor man’s Raw Story (which is in itself just a crappier version of Huffington Post) – has this to say on the topic of the Canadian crackdown on exposed female parts:

The female students say they weren’t trying to violate the dress code, but they wanted to dress appropriately for the Canadian province’s unseasonably warm weather. Temperatures reached nearly 70 degrees last week, which is “a virtual heat wave in the harsh subarctic city,” according to the National Post.

This has been an recurring issue in Canada this spring. Over the past month, several teen girls across different provinces have been sent home from school for wearing shorts and sleeveless shirts. Now, some of them are fighting back against what they perceive as sexist dress codes. Last week, a 14-year-old in Ottawa wore a spaghetti strap shirt specifically to protest her school’s policy. And a 15-year-old in Quebec recently started hanging up signs around her high school telling school administrators, “It’s hot outside. Instead of shaming girls for their bodies, teach boys that girls are not sexual objects.”

Dress code issues certainly aren’t specific to our neighbor to the north. Here in the United States, schools across the country work to police girls’ necklines and hemlines so they aren’t a “distraction” to their male peers. Girls have been kicked out of prom for wearing short skirts, banned from wearing leggings to class, and even photoshopped to appear as though they’re showing less skin in their yearbook photos. There’s a common thread running throughout these examples: The assumption that it’s young women’s responsibility to cover up their bodies because men just can’t help themselves. Dress code critics point out that’s the same cultural attitude that contributes to rape culture and the normalization of violence against women.

Ha!  “Rape culture,” says writer Tara Culp-Ressler.

Seventy degrees though, that’s like a Holocaust.  I can’t imagine covering my legs past the knees in that kind of heat, let alone wearing a top which covered my bra.

Right?  I mean, am I right?

Seriously though, Tara – what is a mostly naked woman if not a sex object?  You expect us to actually believe that the girls do this not to draw attention from boys, but because it is hot outside?  What about every society throughout all of history, which would have assumed girls dressed like this were either prostitutes or severely desperate for a man in their life?

Reality does exist, and the purpose of a man being intrigued by a woman’s body – the biological purpose of this biological reality – is that the woman should be able to draw the man in, as she needs him to protect her.  This is a fact of nature, which has absolutely zero to do with your retard politics, which are just goofy excuses for women attempting to dominate men by abusing their biological nature.

The idea of “teaching” boys to shut off a biological drive simply could not be any more retarded.  The only way you could do this would be with some type of testosterone-nullifying medication.  Because the sight of a scantily-clad woman causes a chemical reaction in the brains of men.  This is a biological reality.  It cannot be changed because of you think it should be changed, it could only be changed through some manner of neurological disruption process involving chemicals.

I don’t blame the girls involved.  They are growing up in a culture where they are taught to use their sexuality not for securing a mate – which, again, is the purpose of female sex appeal – but as a means of achieving power within society.  I don’t even blame Tara Culp-Ressler for this crap she wrote.

You know who I blame?

The Jews who created this nonsense and pushed it on the people.

The utter shamelessness of our contemporary culture is nowhere more apparent than in the drunken escapades of the bachelorette party.

The Jewish lie of “sexual liberation” and “gender equality” has resulted in women brazenly acting in the most un-ladylike fashion imaginable.

Marriage was instituted for the purpose of chastity and procreation, and our sick society celebrates entry into this state by a crude mockery of all that marriage stands for.

From the Daily Mail:

Strippers, midgets, bull riding and lots – lots – of booze.

That may sound like the formula for a fabulous bachelor party for a young man about to kiss the single life goodbye. But – as a New York City-based photographer learned – it’s also the recipe for a night of ‘sanctioned debauchery’ for women about to take the plunge.
Photographer Dina Litovstky has compiled a collection of fabulous photos that dive into the erotic – in most cases, booze-infused and penis-shaped – world of bachelorette parties, where women throw caution to the wind and let loose as they prepare to send a friend into wedded bliss.

Condoms aren’t just for safe sex anymore — Montana State University apparently considers them as great clothing material.

Next month the public university will hold a Latex and Lace Condom Fashion Show, in which about 30 students will strut down a T-shaped runway — in front of more than 1,300 MSU students and staff — dressed in outfits comprised of condoms.

According to an email announcement obtained by The Daily Caller from Mandy St. Aubyn, program manager in the school’s Office of Activities & Engagement, the event will be held on Friday, Feb. 7 this year.

“In collaboration with the MSU Women’s Center, the Voice Center, AID Outreach and Bridger Care, MSU Health Promotion is hosting the fifth annual Latex and Lace Condom Fashion Show to kick-start the Sexual Health Awareness month this February,” the email reads.

This will be the fifth year the school holds the condom fashion show event.

Video from the 2012 event:

Read More

I don’t actually know how Sir David Jason is.  But I agree with his statements.

From the Express:

The Only Fools and Horses actor said that moral standards in Britain and the US were being “eroded”.

In a rant against the singer, who is famed for her outrageous behaviour and ‘twerking’, he told The Sun on Sunday: “Miley Cyrus epitomises what we have allowed.”

The 73-year-old claimed that Britons had “lost their standards” when it comes to publicity and the media.

He added: “Once upon a time if you said this or did that you’d be off the air. They wouldn’t dare show it.”

It is good that a famous individual is able to say what we are all thinking.

Thankfully – or perhaps not – Pussy Riot is no longer a band. They are simply everyday disgruntled sluts trying to destroy civilization for the Jews. It is interesting, perhaps, that I never understood how they were a band in the first place, given that they do not play instruments and don’t have any songs.

In a recent press conference, Nadya Tolokonnikova said “We are not Pussy Riot now.”

“We can promote our cause without playing any shows,” Maria Alyokhina added. “And we will never play any shows for money.”

Despite the fact that they are suspiciously more attractive than they were going into prison, suggesting that the Russian female prison system is similar to some type of luxury spa, they have made the boring decision to focus their present efforts on complaining about their time in prison, saying “waaahhhh, it is really bad to be in prison for committing a crime, waaahhh, people shouldn’t have to do that.”

Specifically, Nadya is outraged by the fact that she was forced to sew uniforms while incarcerated, claiming in a letter published by the Guardian in September that it was suspiciously similar to the Jewish Holocaust:

A threatening, anxious atmosphere pervades the work zone. Eternally sleep-deprived, overwhelmed by the endless race to fulfill inhumanly large quotas, prisoners are always on the verge of breaking down, screaming at each other, fighting over the smallest things. Just recently, a young woman got stabbed in the head with a pair of scissors because she didn’t turn in a pair of pants on time. Another tried to cut her own stomach open with a hacksaw. They stopped her.

No doubt accustomed to making a living laying on her back [NSFW], I can understand how she was so traumatized by being forced to push buttons and hold pieces of cloth, but these undocumented and unverifiable claims regarding scissor stabbings and attempted suicide by hacksaw stomach-slash strike me as rather unbelievable.

I wonder if any “political activists” were made into soap or lampshades in this horrible Sewocaust?

During their Friday whine-fest, the girls also suggested that the Jew criminal Khodorkovsky replace Putin as president.

Speaking on Putin, Tolokonnikova said: “I think he believes that Western countries are a threat, that it’s a big bad world out there where houses walk on chicken legs and there is a global Masonic conspiracy. I don’t want to live in this terrifying fairytale.”

Instead of asking her what the hell she meant by implying Western countries were not a threat to Russia, she was asked who she would like to replace Putin, to which she replied “I’d like to offer Mikhail Borisovich [Khodorkovsky] the job.”

Her comrade then confirmed that she also would like to place a Jewish criminal as president of Russia.

More Pointless Sub-Cultural Icons for a Pointless Sub-Cultural Society

The girls’ first interview was fun.  It was with slutty anti-Putin socialite turned television star, Ksenia Sobchak, who bills herself as Russia’s Paris Hilton.

It appears to have been a setup to make the Pussy Rioters appear more reasonable than they actually are by sitting them next to a totally unhinged woman.

The three sat around and drank tea while Sobchak asked them how much they were worth, if it was sexist that Nadya was focused on more because of her luscious lips, and what they think the meaning of life is, before closing the interview by reading from a book about Nietzsche.

Buzzfeed did a pretty funny piece about it.

Here’s the entire thing (without subtitles).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDBnFsZ_jyo#t=21

These two women (who do not want to be called Pussy Riot, but whose names we cannot pronounce) are now global cultural icons.  Regrettably.  Putin has released them not simply on the Russian people, but on all of us.

What do they want?

What are they actually even talking about?

Which Jews are funding them?

The same ones funding Femen, who appear to be part of the same unclear sexual/political/anti-religious agenda against the Slavic race?

Only time will tell.