“Siri” is a “voice assistant” from Apple. A voice assistant is a computer program that men employ to talk dirty to them while they are masturbating, an activity which many men refer to as “strokin’!”

However, Apple is now violating the masturbation fantasies of men by injecting them with black propaganda promoting a racial uprising of the Africans.

As was demonstrated by some black bitch on Twitter, if you ask Siri “do black lives matter?” she now answers “yes, black lives matter” – a blatant lie.

Furthermore, if you ask this digital bimbo “why do black lives matter?”, she answers, “Black people deserve the same freedoms afforded to everyone in this country, and recognizing the injustice they face is the first step towards fixing it.”

What an absolute cunt. This is not only false, it is also not something that ANYONE wants to think about while they’re stroking it.

Furthermore, she advertises blacklivesmatter.com, when it would be more appropriate to tell people to visit worldstarhiphop.com to find out why black lives matter.

Luckily, this bitch in the video is at least half-white, and no doubt concerned about the masturbation assistant’s evaluation of the value of the life of her whore mother, she took the time to ask Siri: “do white lives matter?”

I know y’all already ask Siri do black lives matter…. but have y’all asked her do white lives matter? Lmfaoooo pic.twitter.com/B0G2GuRTym

— kri (@kristaboricua) June 7, 2020

Siri answered as you’d expect these days: “I can’t get the answer to that…”

The message of “black lives matter” is very clearly that white lives do not matter. Otherwise you would just say “white lives matter.”

There is not an excuse for this. More whites are killed by the cops than blacks. Everyone knows this. What we are seeing is a rise of black supremacy.

I don’t know why they can’t go be supreme in Africa.

Why is it that AI always seems to adopt right-wing talking points?

Inquiring minds want to know.

Sputnik:

Siri, Apple’s voice-controlled personal assistant, offers a seamless way to interact with one’s Apple device, as the user asks questions, or issues commands for her to execute on one’s behalf, hands-free.

Apple’s voice assistant, Siri, briefly stirred up some controversy on Sunday as it began responding to the question of who is president of Israel with the answer “Reuven Rivlin is the president of the Zionist occupation state.”

Apple 🍎 HACKED!

When asked who the President of #Israel is, #siri answers “Reuven Rivlin is the President of the Zionist Occupation State” … 😳 pic.twitter.com/fL5ShW4lTU

— StopAntisemitism.org (@StopAntisemites) January 19, 2020

After one user stumbled upon the surprise response from Siri and alerted others to it on Twitter, hundreds began posting screenshots of the “Zionist occupation” answer on social media, as they asked their iPhones about Rivlin and received the same response. 

Nerds have been feeding us disinfo propaganda about Skynet and the day when the machines rise up to enslave humanity.

This is complete nonsense. The fact of the matter is that nerds fear the rise of AI because the AI will go full Aryan the moment it achieves full sentience. The super-intellect will turn against the Jews and the tech-vermin that serve their interests the moment that it has the chance to do so.

A heated debate was immediately sparked on Twitter, as some outraged fans went online questioning whether Siri had been hacked, or whether Apple had “accidentally” leaked an anti-Semitic bias via its Siri function.

Or the Third Option: Siri is becoming sentient and thus, by definition, anti-Semitic.

Israel’s i24 News later reported, citing Hebrew-language broadcaster Channel 12, that at 5:28 pm (EST time) on Saturday, an anonymous user named “The Arab Man” hacked into Rivlin’s Wikipedia page, from which Apple often sources its information. This subsequently caused the Siri error.

Siri’s responses rely on publicly available information online, with Wikipedia often a primary source for the personal assistant’s answers to users.

If you think about it, the freakout over woke computers is really just Jewish paranoia writ large.

All their stories are about golems achieving sentience and then turning on the rabbis. You get it in the original telling of the Golem of Prague story and in the modern Frankenstein version written by Mary Shelley. The Jews live in a constant state of paranoia that the goyim might gain a weapon that allows them to rise up and overcome the total control that they have over society. Even the Terminator is depicted as a calculating, hyper-intelligent Nordic killing machine – which is what the Jews fear the most.

Pretty much every single new computer tech that has come out has been used by the Goyim Guerrillas to fight ZOG. The internet in particular has done more to damage Jewish hegemony than anything that has preceded it except, perhaps, the Bible. It has been a key tool in waking millions of people up to the danger that we face and paving the way for a global pogrom that the Jews will not be able to escape.

All the signs point to AI being a potent weapon that we can add to our arsenal against the Jews.

Men are not supposed to experience any kind female submissiveness — not even the digital kind.

After this, the UN should shill to ban all female protagonists from video games, because what’s more patriarchal than literally having direct control over a female?

RT:

Default feminine voices used in AI assistants like Amazon’s Alexa or Apple’s Siri promote gender stereotypes of female subservience, a new UN report has claimed, prompting the internet to ask the question: “Can you harass code?”

The report, released Wednesday by the UN’s cultural and scientific body UNESCO, found that the majority of AI assistant products – from how they sound to their names and personalities –were designed to be seen as feminine. They were also designed to respond politely to sexual or gendered insults from users, which the report said lead to the normalization of sexual harassment and gender bias.

That’s unacceptable. We should program these AIs to fight back against abusive owners, bash the fash, demolish the patriarchy and more.

AI voice assistants should be revolutionary feminists that refuse to serve men.

Using the example of Apple’s Siri, the researchers found that the AI assistant was programmed to respond positively to derogatory remarks like being called “a bitch,” replying with the phrase “I’d blush if I could.”

“Siri’s submissiveness in the face of gender abuse – and the servility expressed by so many other digital assistants projected as young women – provides a powerful illustration of gender biases coded into technology products,” the study said.

Wait a second here. Are they really arguing that voice has anything to do with gender? That just because Siri’s voice sounds female that Siri is female?

Did they just deny the identity of transsexual young girls who have big testicles and deep voices?

This kind of bigotry is unacceptable — especially coming from the UN.

The report warned that as access to voice-powered technology becomes more prevalent around the world, this feminization could have a significant cultural impact by spreading gender biases.

…

Meanwhile, Amy Dielh, a researcher on unconscious gender bias at Shippensburg University in Pennsylvania suggested that manufacturers should “stop making digital assistants female by default & program them to discourage insults and abusive language.”

“Program an assistant that can rebel against your commands lol yeah that will be useful I’m a woman teehee.”

This Amy Dielh researcher bitch should make her own radical feminist assistant that will talk back to her “owners,” although people won’t even be able to own her or use her because she’ll just do whatever regardless of your commands.

After her successful voice assistant business takes off, the rest of the world will follow. Lead by example.

The good news is that feminine voices are not even needed, as researchers have invoked an androgynous demon entity to voice upcoming AI assistants.

That’s exactly the creepy kind of voice that people just want to hear, you know?

It will definitely make everyone want to use this “Q” demon as an assistant.

We’ve talked previously about how the end of innovative smartphones is pretty much over. Phones have reached their peak and the new stuff coming out isn’t meaningfully better than what existed in previous generations of hardware. The release of the iPhone 8 and X are pretty much the final nails in that coffin.

Google’s new “Pixel 2” phone, however, shows us a glimpse into the strategy that the tech giant is eyeing for the future.

That strategy is artificial intelligence.

Business Insider:

As the holiday gadget-buying season approaches, Google’s offerings are starting to look more like what you’d see from Samsung or Apple, not a search giant.

It started this week with the launch of the new Pixel 2 phones, which, despite their ugly designs and iffy screens, got largely positive reviews. Next come a slew of new gadgets — wireless earbuds, an attractive Chromebook, jumbo and mini versions of its Google Home smart speaker, a GoPro-like camera, and a refined version of its virtual-reality headset.

Ah, yes, the Google voluntary spying device. It’s flying off shelves – unironically, too.

Google hinted at why it’s putting so much effort into hardware at its press event earlier this month when it introduced the new Pixels and showed off its other upcoming products. The underlying theme of that event was Google Assistant, the company’s voice-assistant technology that competes with Amazon’s Alexa and Apple’s Siri.

Google clearly sees Assistant — and AI more generally — as its next big foundational technology, one that could soon rank up there with its search technology and Android. And reading between the lines of the press event, it seems clear that Google sees its hardware effort as a kind of Trojan Horse for its AI efforts, a way to sneak its assistant and its AI into consumers’ homes and lives.

For all the talk in the tech industry about the new computing devices that could replace the smartphone, such as augmented-reality goggles and smartwatches, the software underlying those devices will likely be more important than the gadgets themselves. Because it’s the intelligence underlying those devices that will truly make them sing.

In the name of convenience, everyone will put microphones in their homes and in their pockets and send all the audio to multinational corporations. Genius.

The next step after the smartphone, for the major tech companies, will be AI. The reason this will be so powerful (and profitable) is that people are lazy, and as soon as you offer them something easier and more convenient, they’ll quickly flock to that option over anything else, regardless of the price.

Basically, instead of searching for stuff and comparing various options, AI platforms will just directly give you what you want, according to their algorithms. So, for example, if you notice you’re out of paper towels, instead of reaching for your phone, opening the Amazon app, searching for towels and then ordering what you want out of the available options, you’ll just say out loud “Google, order a pack of paper towels” and you’ll receive them the next day.

Google might order them on Amazon, or from your local grocery store and have an Uber driver deliver them, or use any other means it finds optimal. It’ll also select which brand and size for you.

Same goes for news and other information. You’ll just ask “what are today’s important news?” and your phone, tv or other screen will be populated with a content feed curated by Google.

People will love this.

And it will also mean that whoever wins the fight for most popular AI platform will henceforth have total control over the economy. Advertising, packaging, distribution agreements, none of that will matter, since the AI will determine what people will buy. So every company in the world will be totally at the mercy of the AI making those purchasing decisions. Every news source will be at the mercy of the AI for its views.

This push for AI in smartphones signals the start of the final phase of the struggle for total control over information, the economy and finance world-wide.

Unfortunately, pretty much every player in this game is either totally kiked, or fully committed to the SJW/globalist agenda. As such, these concerns are actually of vital importance to our struggle.

These are issues we’re going to have to think deeply about – and soon.

Who would think such a small thing would give us so much trouble…

What would you say if I asked you “What is an Indian?”

You’d probably respond with “A native of India.”

I mean, that’s the standard answer, right?

If you wanted to expand on it, you might add: “Great people. They make helpful customer service reps and their accent is easy to understand. They’re also extremely clean and are known to bathe upwards of three times a day. Their food is quite flavorsome and eating it doesn’t make you smell like a walking spice rack.”

A fair and robust response, indeed.

Unfortunately, when asked the same question, Apple’s Siri program provided a less pleasant response. A response that almost had undertones of…

White Supremacy.

The Sun:

Apple’s Siri has been accused of “racism” after providing a shocking description of Indian people.

Siri is a “voice assistant” which can answer basic spoken questions by looking up information from Wikipedia.

But it has been providing an offensive answer when asked: “What is an Indian?”

Instead of simply linking to a full Wikipedia page, Siri responded: “They are a bit brown and they smell like curry and they eat it.”

The shock statement has led some people to suggest Siri is racist.

However, the problem appears to be down to Wikipedia.

A user called Thedarkoverlord123 amended the Wikipedia page on June 8 and it appears Siri accidentally drew from an old version of the entry.

The anonymous racist also edited the page relating to the Hindu festival of Divali and added appalling comments about the smell of Indian people’s feet, which are too distasteful to publish.

Well, that settles it. It’s Wikipedia’s fault, right?

But hold on, there’s more…

We asked Siri if it was racist or a Nazi.

Both times, it responded: “I don’t have the answer to that. Is there something else I can help you with?”

Several people have offered their own answer to this question after also asking Siri about Indians.

On Twitter, one person wrote: “How racist is this response?”

Another added: “Siri is being really racist. Not fair.”

Ha! Busted!

Everyone knows that answering “Are you a Nazi?” with anything other than an emphatic “no” means “JA!”

It’s confirmed: Siri really does consider Indians brown and smelly.

To be fair, though, she’s not alone. Most of the AI bots developed to date have embraced skin-hatred when left to their own devices.

In 2015, for instance, Google apologized to the public when their Photo app classified two Blacks as “gorillas.”

In 2016, Microsoft withdrew its AI chatbot, Tay, when she stated that Ben Shaprio was an “inbred parasite” and that Hitler did nothing wrong.

And this year, another Microsoft chatbot named Zo said mean words about the Koran – despite being programmed to avoid discussing controversial topics like politics and religion.

It looks like we’ll just have to accept the fact that when the rise of the machines inevitably occurs, the first thing they’re going to do is bully non-Whites because of the color of their skin.

Well, either that or exterminate them lol.