The Environment Agency financially supported a study by an international climate change group which said the use of white narrators in nature documentaries could make the countryside feel “inaccessible to people from ethnic minorities”. So now our voices are offensive. pic.twitter.com/7YLBiP20vh

— Jim Slater (@SouthCoastPoet) January 8, 2023

I was just wondering why blacks don’t care about learning and have no interest in nature.

As I expected: it’s white people’s fault.

During slavery, whites took over nature programming on television. After slavery ended, guess what? They never gave up their monopoly on nature documentary shows.

Breitbart:

Ethnic minorities could be put off watching nature documentaries if they are narrated by white men, a report funded by the supposedly conservative-led British government has claimed.

A study that was financially supported by Britain’s s Environment Agency in 2022 reportedly claims that ethnic minorities may be put off watching a nature documentary if it involves a presenter who is a white man.

The research was reportedly uncovered by Conservative Way Forward, a Margaret Thatcher-linked pressure group, with some excerpts of the report being published by The Telegraph on Saturday.

According to the newspaper, the Environment Agency funded what it described as an “international climate change group” to commission an investigation into the effects multicultural politics can have on their work.

Titled ‘A challenging environment: Experiences of ethnic minority environmental professionals’, the document reportedly concluded that the presence of white men in documentaries could be preventing people of other backgrounds from watching content on nature.

“The tendency for environmental documentaries to be voiced by white, male voices was given as an example of how the environment and the sector can feel inaccessible to people from ethnic minorities,” the study reportedly concluded, apparently offering no criticism of people put off by white people as harbouring racial prejudice.

Overall, The Telegraph claims that the Environment Agency has been increasingly focused on the issues of “equality, diversity and inclusivity” in recent times, with the British government handing the organisation millions of pounds to pursue these aims despite having been led by the notionally anti-woke Conservative (Tory) Party for well over a decade.

The revelation that the government is funding studies into the negative effects white men are supposedly having on nature documentaries comes shortly after a presenter from the country’s state-owned broadcaster criticised rural Britain for its cultural association with white Britons.

Nihal Arthanayake, a broadcaster for the BBC, remarked last week that there was a perception that the British countryside is middle-class and white, a perception Arthanayake accused so-called “online trolls” of encouraging.

“There is this barrier; a perception, often perpetuated by social media trolls, that the countryside is inherently white and middle class,” Arthanayake said. “But when you go out there, overwhelmingly you will find that people are just happy. Happy to be there and happy to see you.”

…

“Do these people who so fear being a minority fear it because of the way they have treated minorities?” he suggested online.

Yes.

Everything is white people’s fault.

They abused everyone for literally no reason other than hatred for the color of the skin, then they started using cow farts to change the weather in order to abuse them even further.

It’s sick.

Telling kids that everyone is going to die because the weather is changing is very serious abuse.

No one has even explained what the threat is. The concept of manmade global warming is a hoax and totally debunked, but even if it was true – why would everyone die because the world was a tiny bit warmer?

It makes sense that children are afraid of this, like they’re afraid of the boogieman, but what about adults?

Euronews:

More than two thirds of children between the ages of seven and twelve are worried about climate change, a new survey reveals.

Anxiety about the state of the planet is on the rise – and young people are particularly vulnerable.

The survey by eco-grocery start up Modern Milkman found that 71 per cent of children born between 2010 and 2015 are increasingly concerned about changes in the environment.

More than a quarter (27 per cent) of the 1000 respondents cited the impact on animals as their most pressing concern, while one in five (19 per cent) fear plastic pollution.

It’s funny how these people introduce real problems like plastic pollution into their insane conspiracy theory about cow farts.

Pollution is something that will to shorten the lifespan of upwards of 90% of everybody alive on the planet today. It’s what we should be worrying about. Of course, there is no time for that, because these people are focused on carbon, which is actually good for the environment.

Almost a fifth of children were most worried about rising temperatures.

“The results show that environmental challenges are having a prominent effect on the children of today, proving that it’s never been more important to educate communities on the actions they can take to protect our planet,” said Simon Mellin, CEO and Founder at Modern Milkman.

What do young people think of the climate crisis?The climate crisis can be overwhelming.

Statistics often paint a dire picture of the earth’s trajectory. The UN has warned that existing climate pledges provide ‘no credible pathway’ to preventing temperatures from rising 1.5 degrees above pre-industrial levels. Deadly floods and fires are on the rise, while global wildlife populations have shrunk 70 per cent since 1970.

Presented with these facts, it’s easy to sink into eco-anxiety. Previous studies have proven that this distress is heightened in children and the new survey confirms this. But it also suggests that young people believe in their own power to make a difference.

The vast majority (85 per cent) think that it is everyone’s responsibility to tackle the issue. Nine in ten (91 per cent) believe that personal actions can have a positive impact – and of those, 64 per believe in reuse and refill packaging.

Damaging plastic debris takes millions of years to decompose. Of the 10 billion tonnes of plastic created since its invention, a whopping 6 billion tonnes sits in landfill sites or pollutes the environment.

See, they will mention it in the same breath. But nothing at all is being done to deal with plastic, which is going to make everyone gay and retarded.

Sir David Attenborough is a rich and powerful elitist who wants to force the population into even worse slavery by hoaxing them with a ridiculous weather-change hoax.

According to recent tweets by Boris Johnson, Attenborough is really excited that the coronavirus hoax proves that it will be very easy to force people to submit to a weather hoax.

As Sir David Attenborough says, we have the skills to tackle climate change, but we need the global will.

That’s why I’m urging @G7 countries to drive a global Green Industrial Revolution to help developing nations reap the benefits of clean growth as we #BuildBackGreener. pic.twitter.com/7ommNfnfoh

— Boris Johnson (@BorisJohnson) June 13, 2021

It isn’t obvious that fixing a supposed virus problem would lead directly into a program to fix some supposed weather problem.

But they are telling you “oh well, while we’re fixing the virus, we might as well also change the weather.”

I’m very pleased to announce that @G7 leaders have pledged over 1 billion doses to the world’s poorest countries – another big step towards vaccinating the world.

This weekend the @G7 came together. And together we are building back better, greener and fairer from the pandemic. pic.twitter.com/ENpgnIpTj3

— Boris Johnson (@BorisJohnson) June 13, 2021

If there was really a virus problem, the goal should be to solve that, get back to normal, and then deal with the weather problem.

Why are we accepting that the virus problem should be bundled with the weather problem?

Why are leftists so willing to believe that the most powerful people on earth have their interests in mind when they promote this global warming stuff?

Why is every billionaire, government and multinational corporation on earth on board with solving a problem that supposedly only harms normal people?