The Korean “Slutpocalypse” continues!

No survivors!

Korea Times:

More babies in Korea are born to parents who are not legally married, and the ratio of births occurring outside of marriage hit a record high of 4.7 percent in 2023, data showed Wednesday.

The data Statistics Korea released comes as the number of marriages in Korea plummeted 40 percent from 2013 to 2023, leading to a decrease in the country’s overall birthrate.

The agency said a total of 230,000 babies were born last year, down 7.7 percent from 2022.

The 2023 figure also marked the lowest since the agency began compiling relevant data in 1970.

On the other hand, 10,900 infants, or 4.7 percent of the 230,000 newborns, were extramarital births.

“Shamefur!”

The rate is the highest to date, steadily increasing from 2.1 percent in 2013 to 2.5 percent in 2020, 2.9 percent in 2021 and 3.9 percent in 2022.

“The increase in births outside of marriage is mainly attributable to the high cost of marriage and changing social norms,” Statistics Korea said.

Ya think?

(Actually, the economic thing is total bullshit, as Anglin has explained – but it is definitely changing social norms, which have validated a slutpocalypse. I blame the new nigger-tier K-pop that has emerged in the last 10 years.)

It pointed out that a total of 193,673 marriages were reported in 2023, slightly higher than the 191,690 marriages reported a year earlier but 40 percent lower than 322,807 in 2013.

Last year, more than 30 percent of those in their 20s or 30s cited “lack of money” was a reason for not getting married.

The average age of women giving birth in 2023 reached a record high of 33.6, up by 0.1 from a year earlier. The average age of fathers was 36.1.

Under these circumstances, the number of births dropped for the eighth consecutive year in 2023 to 230,000, down 47.3 percent from 436,455 tallied in 2013.

The country’s fertility rate, which had already been the world’s lowest, fell to 0.72 in 2023.

It could also be, you know.

That thing everyone got injected with.

That doesn’t seem to have helped with birthrates.

And the fact that “South Koreans” are still wearing masks at a very high rate (because they are deranged) is definitely is not helping with the social fabric.

JD Vance was raised by a single mother, and when she struggled with addiction his beloved grandmother stepped in to raise him.

He has nothing but respect and gratitude for the millions of women and mothers across America.

Anyone who says otherwise is a liar!

— Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 (@mtgreenee) July 26, 2024

Previously: If My Father Raped, Killed, And Ate a Baby, I Would Not Change My Last Name

James Donald Bowman’s mother constantly changing his name is unfortunate, and a consequence of the gynocracy. It’s easy to feel for him on that one.

However, once you turn 18, you can legally change your own name. For a normal male, this would mean just changing it back to their original name, because that is the way names work.

You can have fun with nicknames and pseudonyms, but your name is your name. Changing your name is a bizarre act, short of some sort of extenuating circumstances, like being in the witness protection program.

AP:

When it comes to Republican vice presidential nominee JD Vance’s name, it’s complicated.

The senator from Ohio introduced himself to the world in 2016 when he published his bestselling memoir, “Hillbilly Elegy,” under the name J.D. Vance — “like jay-dot-dee-dot,” he wrote, short for James David. In the book, he explained that this was not the first iteration of his name. Nor would it be the last.

Over the course of his 39 years, Vance’s first, middle and last names have all been altered in one way or another. As Vance is being introduced to voters across the country as Donald Trump’s new running mate, his name has been the source of both curiosity and questions — including why he no longer uses periods in JD.

He was born James Donald Bowman in Middletown, Ohio, on Aug. 2, 1984, his middle and last names the same as his biological father, Donald Bowman. His parents split up “around the time I started walking,” he writes. When he was about 6, his mother, Beverly, married for the third time. He was adopted by his new stepfather, Robert Hamel, and his mother renamed him James David Hamel.

…

Vance spent more than two decades as James David “J.D.” Hamel. It’s the name by which he graduated from Middletown High School, served in Iraq as a U.S. Marine (officially, Cpl. James D. Hamel), earned a political science degree at The Ohio State University and blogged his ruminations as a 26-year-old student at Yale Law School. Those facts are borne out in documentation provided by those entities upon request, or otherwise publicly available, and were confirmed by campaign spokesperson Taylor Van Kirk.

But the situation gnawed at him, particularly after his mother and adoptive father divorced.

…

So he decided to change his name again, to Vance — the last name of his beloved Mamaw, the grandmother who raised him.

It didn’t happen on his wedding day in 2014, as the book implies, but in April 2013, as he was about to graduate from Yale, Van Kirk said. It felt right to take the name of the woman who raised him before dying in 2005, as he was putting the struggles of his early life behind him and launching into this new phase.

Probably, the strangest part about all of this is that his father’s name was “Donald,” and that he hated that name so much he excised it from himself (or his mother did? either way he kept it off).

Now, he’s once again under the authority of a man named Donald.

With all of these various changes, he might as well change his middle name back to Donald “in honor of Donald Trump becoming like a new father to me.”

I’m not one to beat up on a man who has been beat up on by women – in most situations. But when you have a man who has serious unresolved problems with his mother (and therefore his father) taking a position of power, which should ask what the consequences of that are going to be.

For “Vance,” the consequences are that he’s got no real identity and the hole where an identity should be has been filled with support for Israel and mass Indian immigration.

In Middletown for the JD Vance rally. Just met his mother and sister. They are not allowed to talk with the media today. They told me they are proud beyond words. Join us starting at 4 on @WLWT News 5 for live team coverage. @karinjohnson and @ToddDykesWLWT are here with me. pic.twitter.com/WIa4BJXH1F

— MikeDardisWLWT (@MikeDardisWLWT) July 22, 2024

The head of the Mexican Cartel López Fentanyl Obrador threatening Republicans. pic.twitter.com/qXgDheOkzo

— 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸 (@Real_RobN) March 10, 2023

He’s right you know.

Single moms are the real virus.

RT:

The fentanyl crisis claiming tens of thousands of American lives every year is of the US’ own making, Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopes Obrador, known as AMLO, said in a statement on Thursday.

“Here, we do not produce fentanyl, and we do not have consumption of fentanyl,” AMLO continued, advising Americans to “take care of their problem of social decay” instead of waging literal war on drug cartels.

The Mexican leader argued the addiction epidemic north of the border had more to do with social ills like single-parent families, parents who evict grown children, and grown children who stash their elderly relatives in care homes “and visit them once a year,” than any issues on the supply side, even though his government has seized tens of millions of doses of the drug in recent years.

AMLO’s statement followed a call by US Senator Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) to “unleash the fury and might of the US against these cartels.” While stressing that he did not want to “invade Mexico,” the notoriously belligerent Republican argued the Pentagon should “destroy drug labs that are poisoning Americans.”

The Mexican president denounced Graham’s words as “an insult to Mexico and a lack of respect for our independence and sovereignty,” threatening to tell all Mexicans and Hispanics living in the US to vote against the “inhuman and interventionist” Republican Party.

Meanwhile, after some Americans got killed in Mexico, conservatives have started calling for a war against Mexico.

War captain Vivek is front and center, calling for an invasion.

The cartels may be AMLO’s sugar daddy now, but in Jan 2025 there’ll be a new daddy in town. We’ll use our military to secure our own border & annihilate the cartels if necessary: that’s how you solve the fentanyl supply problem. Military force is both legally & morally justified. https://t.co/9YMTVDNuES

— Vivek Ramaswamy (@VivekGRamaswamy) March 9, 2023

Invading Mexico is kind of a funny idea I guess, but come on. We have serious problems in this country, including single moms causing everyone to be addicted to fentanyl.

The fact is, Mexico is now a much better country than America.

Related: Seattle Bus Driver Says Passengers Commonly Doing Drugs, Smoking Fentanyl

Society just keeps getting healthier and healthier as we approach our final destination: utopia!

Forward march – into the future!

PROGRESS!

Sky News:

More babies were born outside marriage or a civil partnership in England and Wales in 2021 than within.

It is the first time that has happened since records began in 1845, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said.

There were 624,828 live births in 2021, it reported, of which 320,713 (51.3%) were registered to women who were not in a formally recognised relationship.

The figures reflect a long-term trend during which the number of marriages has declined while more couples have decided to cohabit instead.

Age makes a big difference, however. In 2021, new mothers aged 30 and over were almost twice as likely to be married or in a civil partnership (60.5%) than those under 30 (31.2%).

The average age of mothers increased to 30.9 in 2021, while the average age of fathers remained at 33.7.

Only 30.9? Why not 60.9? After all, women have to have time to take at least a million zillion gillion cocks before they decide to settle down.

It’s a little thing I like to call “democracy.”

At least 30.9 year olds are smart enough to know that they don’t need no man.

John Griffin

No wonder these people stand with the Ukraine.

Jeez.

New York Post:

A former CNN producer pleaded guilty to a child sex charge on Monday for sexually assaulting a 9-year-old girl after luring her to his Vermont ski house.

John Griffin, 45, pleaded guilty in federal court to using interstate commerce for the enticement of a minor as part of a plea deal in which the two remaining counts of enticement of a minor he was initially charged with last year were dropped.

Griffin, of Stamford, Connecticut, met a woman online and persuaded her to bring her 9-year-old daughter to his $2.5 million Vermont cabin where he engaged in sexual activity with the child, according to prosecutors.

Griffin paid the mother $3,000 to fly from Nevada to Boston in July 2020, where he picked them up in a Tesla and drove them to his Ludlow, Vermont house, where he directed the young girl to engage in unlawful sexual activity.

The mother, Heather Carriker, was also arrested and slapped with child abuse and child sex assault charges.

Heather Carriker

The former producer asked the parents of several minors to bring their daughters to his home for “sexual subservice” training and allegedly bragged about luring girls as young as 7 to his pad.

He told the parents he believed that a “woman is a woman regardless of her age” and that as such, all women should be sexually subservient and inferior to men, prosecutors said.

Griffin tried to get other young girls to do sex acts for him through their parents, according to court documents.

In April 2020, he suggested to the mother of a 14-year-old girl that she and her daughter do a “virtual training session” over video chat in which he would instruct the pair to undress and touch one another at his direction.

Two months later he tried to persuade a woman and her 16-year-old daughter to take a “little mother-daughter trip” to his ski house for sexual training.

He attempted to lure the girls to his Vermont ski house for “training sessions” on such things as “spanking” and “c–k worship,” prosecutors said in court documents.

What is a ski house?

New York Post, December 16, 2021:

Heather Carriker, 48, of Henderson, was arrested on August 21, 2020, on two counts of child abuse, two counts of sexual assault against a child under 14 and one count of lewdness with a minor under 14.

Former Chris Cuomo producer Griffin is accused of flying Carriker and a 9-year-old girl described as her adoptive daughter to Logan Airport in Boston in July 2020 and then driving them in his red Tesla to a $2.5 million ski house in Ludlow, Vt., according to a federal indictment filed in Vermont last week.

Carriker was one of several women claiming to be the mother of a young daughter whom Griffin contacted on kink websites about training the girls in “sexual subservience.” He allegedly paid Carriker $3,350, in part for the flight to Boston.

Griffin’s apparent involvement with Carriker came to light as part of a police investigation in Nevada spurred by the child’s biological mother, Catherine O’Sullivan. O’Sullivan, who apparently took care of her daughter some of the time, discovered a trove of disgusting text messages between Carriker and a man, called “Meet Man,” who helped set Carriker up with at least four other “boyfriends” for BDSM activity, according to the police report.

At one point, Carriker allegedly references going to meet a man described as her “Dom.” Carriker also texted “Meet Man” that she had a “very eager 9yo,” referring to the girl whom she later took with her to meet Griffin in Vermont, who wanted to come see “Meet Man” engage in BDSM activities, the report stated.

O’Sullivan had no idea that Carriker had allegedly taken the child to Boston and Vermont to stay with Griffin until she stumbled across the information in Carriker’s phone and computer — which were accessible via the 9-year-old’s phone, according to the report. O’Sullivan then called Griffin, who apparently confirmed that Carriker and the girl were with him, the report stated.

Griffin also allegedly told O’Sullivan that Carriker had had some sort of accident in Boston and was hospitalized, and the child was alone with him in Vermont, the report said.

“John claimed nothing happened between him and (the girl),” the report said. “He told Catherine he did not want to talk to police but would if he had to.”

However, the girl told a police-affiliated social worker that she had taken part in explicit sexual activity at Griffin’s Ludlow home with both Griffin and Carriker, according to the police report. She said it all took place on the third floor of the $2.5 million ski house, the report said.

…

Retired FBI Special Agent Arnold Bell, who spent 12 years running a violent crimes bureau in Los Angeles that involved busting child porn rings, said that “predators” who get close to kids or even pose as their parents to engage them in sexual activity or swap and sell them out to others is “not at all uncommon.”

You’re going to have sick people who are perverts.

But why don’t kids have fathers?

Why are mothers kicking fathers from the home?

Why does society accept this?

This seems to be somewhat deceptive data, actually.

Some huge percentage of the babies born in the UK and Wales are Moslem (we don’t know how many, but it’s a lot). They probably are born “in wedlock,” it’s just that the Moslems do their own methods for marriage and don’t register it with the government, because if they register as single mothers they get more welfare.

But yeah – white women also get more welfare if they are unmarried mothers, so the incentive exists for everyone.

Breitbart:

The majority of babies were born to unmarried mothers in Britain for the first time in recorded history, the Office for National Statistics revealed on Tuesday.

ONS figures showed that there of the 624,828 live births recorded in England and Wales last year, over 320,000 were born out of wedlock, compared to 320,713 that were born to married parents or those in a civil partnership.

This means that 51.3 per cent of live births were born to unmarried women, the first time a majority of babies were born out of wedlock since such record began in 1845.

Up until 1978, the percentage of children born out of wedlock was less than ten per cent, however, this increased to 34 per cent by 1988 and has been over 40 per since the turn of the millennium.

The head of health analysis at the ONS, Dr James Tucker said: “This follows the long-term trend of declining marriage rates and increasing numbers of co-habiting couples seen in recent decades.

“However, caution should be taken in interpreting the numbers as we don’t yet know the full impact of the pandemic on marriage and civil partnership statistics.”

The data showed that women are waiting until older ages, with the majority of babies (372,222) being born to women over the age of 30. Conversely, the number of children being born to women under the age of 30 has fallen to half of the rate seen 50 years ago.

Western Baby Crisis: First-Time German Mothers Now Over 30 Years Old on Averagehttps://t.co/r2MuvtrdIp

— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) May 4, 2022

The increasing age of mothers has coincided with the government introducing a raft of policies geared towards increasing female participation in the workforce rather than raising their children at home.

One main area that the government has disadvantaged traditional families has been to levy taxes against individual earnings instead of families as a whole, meaning that families which rely on a single income of £50,000 will take home less money than two salaries of £25,000, thereby incentivising women to work rather than stay at home with children.

Should the supposedly Conservative government wish, it could make tax allowances transferable to mitigate this impact, however, so far, it has refused to even consider introducing policies to improve family life.

Society is a complete disaster.

Rape is just a spook.

New York Post:

A Louisiana judge gave an accused rapist custody of the child conceived from the 2005 attack and eventually ordered his underage victim to pay child support, a report said.

Crysta Abelseth told WBRZ that she was raped at 16 years old when a man nearly twice her age promised to give her a ride home from a local restaurant after a night out with friends.

“Instead of bringing me home, he brought me to his house,” Abelseth said about John Barnes, who was 30 at the time. “Once inside, he raped me on his living room couch.”

She didn’t know it was actually his home and not hers until AFTER she walked through the front door.

John Barnes, CEO of THOT Patrol.

Actually, she didn’t realize it wasn’t her own home until after she got on the couch. The fancy couch gave it away.

The teen became pregnant and had a daughter, who is now a teenager herself, the station said.

“Everyone assumed it [the pregnancy] was from a boyfriend, and I let them believe that,” Abelseth told the outlet.

Barnes reportedly came back into the picture five years later when he found out the child might be his.

“When my daughter was 5 years old, he found out about her, and once he found out about her, he pursued custody and wanted to take her away from me,” Abelseth said, explaining that a DNA test proved with near certainty that he was the father.

“They granted him 50/50 custody despite the fact that [the child] was caused by rape.”

Abelseth filed rape charges against Barnes in 2015 after she found out it was within Louisiana’s statute of limitations, the station reported.

“I thought if I didn’t do it the next day, there was nothing I could do about it,” Abelseth reportedly said. “I went to a trauma counselor, and he said, ‘No, you have 30 years after you turn 18.’”

Haha, how is that real?

The case was still open with the Tangipahoa Parish Sheriff’s Office, and no charges had been filed, according to the station.

“It was never assigned to a detective, and nothing was ever investigated,” Abelseth said.

The now-32-year-old said she has struggled to gain any traction with the justice system and reportedly lost custody of her daughter over allegations she gave her a cellphone.

Court records in connection with the case were inexplicably sealed, according to the article.

“He’s well connected,” Abelseth told the station of Barnes, who owns Gumbeaux Digital Branding, a web company in Ponchatoula that works with local police.

“He’s threatened me multiple times, saying he has connections in the justice system, so I better be careful and he can take her away anytime he wants to. I didn’t believe him until it happened.”

The only evidence to support the theory of “rape” is her word. He should sue her for slander. You can’t just come back years later and publicly accuse someone of rape without any evidence (well, I guess you can now, but she should still sue).

I would sue every single publication that published her claims as fact.

Women wanted this “sexual liberation.” In a previous age, before all of this “consent theory” gibberish, the man could have been charged for fornication and/or unlawful use of her father’s property. Under consent theory, it is he said/she said, and when it’s years later, it is impossible for there to be any evidence.

Of course, she doesn’t even claim this was “rape” as most people think of it – she got in his car, went into his house, had sex on his couch. At no point does she claim there was violence.

Anyone who has ever tried to have sex with a woman who didn’t want to have sex would be aware that the only want to make that happen is through violence that would leave marks. Sorry to be graphic, but these people are making all of these nonsense claims, there is no choice but to be graphic – a woman has strong lower body strength, and can clench her legs together tightly. You would have to beat her into opening her legs, of she is going to be able to keep you out. If you are able to hold her legs apart, she is going to twist and close them again. You can’t have sex that way and cause a pregnancy.

Also: what are the statistical chances that the “rape” would happen while she was ovulating? About 6%. A fertile woman can only get pregnant 5-7% of the hours of a month. These are also the hours where she is horny.

Rape is always, always a hoax unless it involves:

• Bodily injury
• Secretly drugging her

Both of those things can be proved definitively if the woman goes to the police the next day. Well, there is some question with the drugging, because she can’t prove she didn’t take the drugs voluntarily.

What’s more: if women are going to have rights, they have to have some kind of responsibility. You can’t say “women should have all of the exact same rights as men – and even more rights than men, because they are so much more powerful – but also they are stupid pathetic little children who can’t be held responsible for getting in the car with a stranger and then going into his house and getting on his couch.”

I bought one single Hentai game as a joke to play on a stream like two years ago, and Steam is still shilling hardcore sex games at me.

The Hentai game I bought wasn’t even a hardcore sex game. It was an old school platformer that just had like, a 16 bit nude character that would get raped by monsters when you died.

I don’t have to explain anything to you!

But yes: if you buy one light Hentai game on Steam, they will shill sex games at you for the rest of your life.

Anyway, I’m trying to keep track on the VR sex games, as I think that eventually, these are going to get really realistic, and that will really cause people to give up on life even worse.

Why not take the vaxx if you’ve got a VR gf?

Why not turn into a completely fat slob who never leaves his house?

What reason is there to do anything, if you’ve got a VR gf?

So: the latest VR sex game is called VR Hot.

Again, I don’t play these games. I also don’t watch porn. I recommend everyone keep to that philosophy.

But the game popped up on my feed. Most of the VR girlfriends are what you would expect: vaguely Asian-looking with big tits.

Pretty normal.

Asian women are much more attractive than white women – however, they have small breasts. Therefore, the fantasy is an Asian woman with huge breasts.

The most popular VR sex game is Japanese, featuring a gook schoolgirl with massive donkers.

However, I was utterly shocked by this VR girlfriend:

Listen:

• That is one of the girls advertised!
• I saw that bitch’s face before I even clicked on the Steam page for the game!

I said to myself:

• What is going on here?
• Who in the universe would have a fantasy about a fat short-haired pig?

Having thought about it, I realized the answer was that probably a lot of men fantasize about fat short-haired pigs.

You see: men’s sexuality is completely out of whack. Absolutely.

Absolutely.

Basically, every man under the age of 60 has either:

• A single mother, or
• A otherwise domineering mother who controlled and humiliated his father

When you get down to under 40, this is literally universal.

I don’t really think I need to explain that. Just think about it for a second. Think about your own mother, then think about the mothers of every man you know.

So, you’re asking: how does that relate to a man’s fantasy being a short-haired pig?

Well, just wait and relax, because I’m going to tell you soon.

Here’s the deal:

• A son of a domineering mother has zero self-confidence, because you have to get your self-confidence from your father, and he can’t give you that if he is absent or being oppressed by your mother.
• A son of a domineering mother learns very early on that his survival is dependent on the whims of a powerful female who controls him, and decides whether he eats.
• Over the course of his development, the son develops a twisted and pathological relationship with the mother, in which his entire emotional universe surrounds her approval. He becomes manic because her approval is not really based on anything other than her own manic emotions.
• Because his survival as a small child is based on the unhinged emotions of this manic woman, he develops an ingrained neural rewards system wherein his brain rewards him for receiving the approval of a manic woman.

Now that I’ve said it, you all know it’s true.

Conversely, if you’re raised in a patriarchy, your father protects you, and ensures that you’re fed. Even if you displease him, he doesn’t threaten to stop feeding you or leave you in a parking lot. That protection from the father, and the belief that a father has in his son, builds your personal self-esteem, and you seek to become like your father.

This is all just obvious, and it is the underlying problem of our entire society: all of these flimsy, pathetic men were the product of a domineering mother. After the revolutions of the 1960s, all women were “empowered” by the basic nature of the situation, and seized control.

Unless you were born on some rural farm somewhere that had no connection to civilization, then — no, you know what. You didn’t escape this. You didn’t. We all experienced this. Every one of us.

Which, by the way, does mean that your mother was not *personally* responsible. If every woman did the same thing, then we can’t hardly hold them all *personally* responsible. This was a social phenomenon and clearly, if you give women the ability to control men, they will do it, in every situation, no matter what.

Islam is right about women.

Maybe you were better off with a single/divorced mother, as you didn’t have to witness your father being controlled and ultimately destroyed by your mother. I think that’s probably true. Most of the people I’ve met with right in them didn’t have a father around.

Men have responded to this situation differently:

• Some men emulate the mother, and become homosexual.
• Some men simply seek to repeat the situation with the mother with a woman, finding a woman to be their new mommy (this is what a “boyfriend” is – he is a lost puppy seeking a mommy).
• Some men try to be “cool guys” and “ladies’ men,” mixing homosexual behavior patterns with approval-seeking (the most extreme form of this is the self-identifying “pick up artist,” but all men who seek to have sex with a lot of non-prostitute women are seeking as much approval as possible).

Those are the main types. You’ll find that an incel is usually a failed attempt at the second type. Most of them say they want a girlfriend to “love them” and to “care for them.” This is just a very obvious way of saying “I want a new mommy.”

The list of issues that result from the lack of confidence is literally infinite, but here are a few examples of things men do to try to deal with the hole in their souls where they were supposed to have self-esteem:

• Get tattoos
• Develop substance abuse problems
• Work out and become yoked or take steroids and become yoked
• Become obsessed with money
• Buy an oversized truck
• Do cunnilingus
• Talk about giving women orgasms and say it’s really important to pleasure a woman during sex (honestly, I would rather a man tell me he is a child molester than that he loves giving women orgasms)
• Develop an aggressive and angry personality, where they get in people’s faces and so on (tough guy)
• Become effeminate, taking on the social behaviors of women (heterosexual men who do this actually are more feminine than homosexuals, the latter having their own entirely different social order)
• Develop an “individualist” or “artist” identity, where they obsess over finding some hidden meaning in life to compensate for the obvious meaning in life they don’t have, which is a normal patriarchal family – they also pretend to be “deep” in order to try to impress women. (These men are especially horrible, as a result of totally unwarranted self-importance and the belief they are especially gifted in finding hidden meaning, but they just haven’t stumbled on it yet. They often become vindictive when they begin to realize that their illusory specialness will never be appreciated. This is the personality of the compulsive-obsessive journalist, for example. I’ve had several of these trying to ruin my life as a way to demonstrate their value to women.)
• Become a neo-Nazi

Regardless: in every situation, you learn that the woman is the source of all power in the universe. Therefore, it becomes natural to serve women, and to acknowledge their dominant role in society. It’s a Stockholm syndrome that is so ubiquitous that no one notices it. Men just assume that all of this bizarre stuff, and the underlying lack of self-esteem, must be natural because everyone is doing it. Virtually all of the people who remember something else are already dead.

A fat short-haired pig is a symbol of feminine power, so it isn’t surprising that some men would sexually fetishize this.

This probably doesn’t happen to very many men, but apparently it happens to enough that the A/B testing of this game turned up enough upvotes for a short-haired sow that they included her in the promo material.

There are varying degrees of this.

I remember when Sports Illustrated did their first “plus size” model, Ashley Graham, and I wrote about this cow.

People responded saying “oh, but I don’t like skinny girls – this is basically my perfect woman!”

I naturally told those people that they are sickening perverts.

But you know, this goes back to the thing with gays: you can’t control your sexual attraction mechanism. Apparently, you can maybe become progressively more perverse through pornography and fetishism, but the underlying sexual drive is going to be there, and you can’t really change that.

That goes for much of the damage that is done by the mother. Like it or not, your personality and identity were shaped when you were a child, and your mother was in control of that shaping, and that is going to loom over you for the rest of your life. If you have children, a shadow of it will loom over them as well. That’s just life.

The best thing to do is to try to understand it, and then force yourself to buck the trend as much as possible.

You can also set up rules for yourself. A basic one is that you never want to be some bitch’s “boyfriend.” That is like being a small dog. It is humiliating and dehumanizing. The purpose of romantic relationships is sex and/or children. It is not “friendship” or “companionship.” You do not need a female “partner.” That is weird and gay. It’s literally gay – who enjoys the company of women in a friendship setting? It’s homosexuals and otherwise very effeminate men. If you get caught being the boyfriend, you’ve really failed badly, and you need to reevaluate your life.

In general, you need to evaluate all of your interactions with women.

Most of all, I think that Jesse Lee Peterson is 100% correct in the need to forgive your mother. It’s the only way to release all of that anger inside. The anger holds the place of self-esteem, as it is the only defense mechanism a small boy has to protect his ego. When you release that, you can begin to build self-esteem.

In forgiving her, you acknowledge her guilt in wrecking your entire life, permanently, but you also acknowledge that she wouldn’t have done it on purpose. Something happened with women, when they got the option of having this power, they all just came totally unglued. It’s 100% of women.

There is nothing more exhausting than this boomer trope of “there are good women out there.” There are no “good women” or “bad women.” Women do not have personal agency. Their behavior is entirely determined by their environment, and therefore they cannot be good or bad.

Under the Taliban, there are no feminists. Women are forced to wear burkas, and they have no say in anything. They cannot be feminists.

The opposite is true in the modern West. There are no non-feminists. They all have power at their fingertips, and they cannot help but use it to wreck everything around them. They cannot be non-feminists.

If you understand this, you can understand what the Jew social-engineers were trying to do in Afghanistan: they were trying to kick-start feminism, which would completely unravel the entire social order, and bring about every bad thing. With women’s liberation, you get all of the bad things – not just because of the behavior of liberated women, but because of the behavior of men who are raised by liberated women. Liberating women creates a death spiral, where all of the worst things must necessarily happen.

The Taliban can say Allah triumphed, if they want to. That’s their perception of order.

What actually triumphed, however, was masculinity and patriarchy.

That is the only possible victory anyone is going to have. We need to fight for masculinity, above all.

It is shocking and bizarre that so many “right-wingers” do not stand up for men and masculinity. It’s actually confusing. I don’t exactly understand what they are even fighting for at all. Multiculturalism, homosexuality, socialism, and all of the other things that right-wingers are opposed to are the direct result of women’s liberation.

Jews are only a tiny percentage of the population, and most people in the West have never even known a Jew. The process of Judaism was unleashing women. Women will create every bad thing, once they are unleashed. They serve as a personal army for the Jews.

Remember this: “right-wingers” who promote women’s liberation only care about women’s liberation. They are necessarily saying:

“I’m against Jews, multiculturalism, homosexuality, etc. – but I am not willing to sacrifice the liberation of women to end these things. We have to figure out a way to solve these problems while preserving women’s liberation.”

If you don’t believe me, then find one and press them on it. They will try to debate the meaning of “feminism” and “liberation” and say they support “traditional families.”

However, if you nail them down, and ask, “are you willing to return to pre-20th century gender norms, where women were prohibited from being a part of public society and be treated as property by men?”, they will tell you they are unwilling to do that, and that we have to find some other solution, wherein we get rid of every other aspect of modernity, but maintain women’s liberation.

That means that the whole thing is entirely meaningless. Any right-winger who endorses women’s rights is simply jerking off, and doesn’t care about anything he is saying. The only thing he actually cares about is the same thing that all other sons of domineering mothers care about: preserving female dominance of society.

I’ve been through all of this with these people. Obviously, the neo-Nazis are the most extreme feminists on the right, often going even further than the left on the question of women’s liberation, but it’s everywhere. If they’re not talking about the woman problem, then they support it. There is no other reason not to talk about the single most important issue in all of the world.

It is important to note that perverts all have deranged relationships with their mothers which usually devolve into an unwarranted hatred of Adolf Hitler and Richard Nixon.

New York Post:

Quentin Tarantino has revealed in a new interview that he vowed as a kid never to share a penny of his movie-making fortune with his mother, because she allegedly discouraged his writing career.

The Oscar-winner told “Billions” co-creator Brian Koppelman on his acclaimed podcast, “The Moment,” that he first began writing screenplays in grade school, but got in trouble with his teachers, who, “looked at it as a defiant act of rebellion that I’m doing this instead of my school work.”

The “Pulp Fiction” director reportedly wrote a script called, “Captain Peachfuzz and the Anchovy Bandit” when he was just 12.

Tarantino shared with Koppelman that he struggled academically in school, and that, “my mom always had a hard time about my scholastic non-ability.”

When Tarantino was in trouble for writing the screenplays in school, he recalled of his mom, “she was bitching at me… about that…. and then in the middle of her little tirade, she said, ‘Oh, and by the way, this little ‘writing career,’ with the finger quotes and everything. This little ‘writing career’ that you’re doing? That s–t is over!’”

Tarantino recalled, “And when she said that to me in that sarcastic way, I was in my head, and I go, ‘OK, lady. When I become a successful writer, you will never see penny one from my success. There will be no house for you. There’s no vacation for you, no Elvis Cadillac for mommy. You get nothing. Because you said that.”

Koppelman asked Tarantino, “Did you stick to that?”

“Yeah, yeah,” Tarantino said. “I helped her out with a jam with the IRS. But no house. No Cadillac, no house.”

Tarantino said his mother is still living, but added of his decision long ago to cut her out financially, “There are consequences for your words as you deal with your children, remember there are consequences for your sarcastic tone about what’s meaningful to them.”

His mother, Connie, was reportedly 16 when she gave birth to the future directing icon in Tennessee, and they subsequently moved to LA when Tarantino was 4.

The New Yorker wrote in 2003 of the director’s childhood that one biography, “correct[ed] the Agee-esque legend that had grown up around Tarantino since the release of ‘Reservoir Dogs’: that he was a dirt-poor illiterate hillbilly from Tennessee, brought up by a teen-age dropout.”

The piece quoted Tarantino’s mother as telling film critic Jami Bernard — who penned the book, “Quentin Tarantino: The Man and His Movies” — “Quentin would have you believe he was raised by wolves.” But the New Yorker reported of Connie, “It’s true that she was born in Tennessee and had Quentin when she was sixteen, but he was an accident. She got married in order to become an emancipated minor and go to college; she was, therefore, furious to discover that she was pregnant after her husband, Tony Tarantino, had assured her that he was sterile. She was angry enough to divorce him, and she didn’t introduce him to his son until Quentin was a few years old.”

The sad fact of life is that a single mother will inflict any sort of psychological harm she can invent in her twisted brain on a son. The son represents the father in her mind – the eternal “father,” which is her own father and the boy’s father – and the father did not fix her, did not make everything wonderful, how she deserves, and it is therefore her responsibility to rain misery on the boy.

No woman can resist doing this.

No man has a nice thing to say about a single mother unless he is fully in the throes of Stockholm syndrome, or he is actualized and is simply being polite.

The thing you must understand, above all, is that she didn’t mean to hurt you. She just did it by instinct. There is no point in holding that anger towards her, and anyway, all that anger is going to do is eat you up inside, and fully ensure that you never have an opportunity to live your own life in peace.

Just look at this effete queer as he rages against the mommy machine:

That anger towards your mother will make you like a woman. An emotional wreck, like Quentin Tarantino. The only way to get that rotten poison out of your soul is to forgive her, unconditionally, for all of the various forms of hell she put you through.

Hopefully, you are able to walk away from it alive, with a good understanding of the base nature of women under your belt, without ever trusting one again.

Most men who survive a single mother or an otherwise domineering mother who controlled a weak father go on to spend their entire lives in pursuit of the approval of women. The “boyfriend/girlfriend” phenomenon represents this disease, as does pickup artistry.

It is the natural order of the physical universe that men do not need women. So should it naturally be the order of a man’s emotional universe.

James Robert Hutchinson, 6

When dad isn’t around, things always go very badly.

The question is only: how badly?

Do the kids end up psychiatric cases, drug addicts, or does she just go ahead and murder them and dump them in the river?

It depends on a lot of different factors, and sometimes seems arbitrary.

People Magazine:

An Ohio mother is facing a murder charge after allegedly killing her 6-year-old son and throwing his body into the Ohio River.

On Sunday, Brittany Gosney, 29, of Middletown, reported her son James Robert Hutchinson missing, the Middletown Division of Police says in a statement.

Brittany Gosney, 29

In an alert issued on Sunday, Middletown police said in a Twitter post, “We have a missing 6-year-old named James. He is was last seen in the area of Crawford St. He is a white male, 3′ tall, 42 lbs. He has dark blond/reddish hair and blue eyes. He was last seen wearing a red shirt with blue and red Batman pajama pants. If you see him, call 911.”

Police, volunteers and organized search teams immediately began looking for the boy.

We have a missing 6 year old named James. He is was last seen in the area of Crawford St. He is a white male, 3’ tall, 42 lbs. He has dark blond/reddish hair and blue eyes. He was last seen wearing a red shirt with blue and red Batman pajama pants. If you see him, call 911. pic.twitter.com/mjlB0kYPpa

— Middletown Division of Police (@MPDOhio) February 28, 2021

Three hours later, Middletown police updated the post saying, “We are no longer looking in the Crawford Street area. New information has led us outside the city limits. Thank you for your assistance.”

Police stopped looking in the Crawford Street area because upon further questioning, Gosney and her boyfriend, James Hamilton, 42, told investigators that the boy was killed in Preble County a few days before he was reported missing, Middletown Police say in the statement.

…

Court documents obtained by WLWT say Gosney admitted to bringing her 6-year-old son to Rush Run Park in Preble County.

She allegedly told investigators she was going to leave him at the park.

When he tried to get back into the car, she allegedly drove off, “dragging him for a distance at a high rate of speed,” the documents state, according to the outlet.

When she returned 30 to 40 minutes later, she found him in the middle of the road with a head injury, the documents state.

When she found the boy lying in the road, she told authorities she thought he was dead, according to the documents.

Gosney allegedly said she put her son in her car and drove him to a home on Crawford Lane where she placed him in the upstairs bedroom, the documents state, WLWT reports.

The next day, she told police she drove to the Ohio River and dumped his body in the water, the documents state.

Gosney was arrested Sunday and is charged with murder, abuse of a corpse and tampering with evidence.

Hamilton was also arrested Sunday and charged with abuse of a corpse and tampering with evidence.

Any man who gets involved with a single mother is the scum of the earth. This man looks like he’s possessed by demons.

If women knew that single motherhood was the end of their sexual escapades, then we would no longer have single mothers. Men who date or marry single mothers are demonstrably hurting society.