silicon valley – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com Daily Stormer Historical Archive Sat, 04 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.17 https://www.anglinarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/cropped-favicon-32x32.png silicon valley – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com 32 32 Bernie Sanders Condemns Mass Import of Indian Garbage https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/01/04/bernie-sanders-condemns-mass-import-of-indian-garbage/ Sat, 04 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Elon Musk is wrong.

The main function of the H-1B visa program is not to hire “the best and the brightest,” but rather to replace good-paying American jobs with low-wage indentured servants from abroad.

The cheaper the labor they hire, the more money the billionaires make. pic.twitter.com/Mwz7i9TcSM

— Bernie Sanders (@SenSanders) January 2, 2025

See, this is what I told you: the left will not support Indians. No one will support them, other than shills and other Indians.

Granted, Bernie Sanders used to be against all immigration, but he completely cracked on that and has supported mass immigration for a decade. Yet he knows no one cares if he comes out against Indians, because literally no one wants these Indians.

This brings up a fascinating issue: white liberals support mass immigration of third worlders, because they are easily able to avoid them. Poor immigrants live in the areas that formerly belonged to the working class or the blacks. They rarely have to see them in their workplaces, unless they are cleaning the toilets or delivering food. Liberals can get a feel-good “I’m so moral” dopamine boost by supporting these immigrants without having to deal with the consequences (at least for a couple decades).

Indians, however, are flooding middle class and upper-middle class jobs and neighborhoods. Therefore, white liberals will not support them. Because no one wants to be around immigrants. It is simply that liberals never had to deal with immigrants, before this Indian shit-flood which has taken place over the last decade and a half.

This is the winning issue on which we can sink the entire anti-white ship.

It’s possible or probable that most white liberals will not be as vocal as Bernie Sanders is on this issue (though they might be). But the bigger thing is: they’re not going to protest in support of Indians. If they see right-wingers demanding these people be put out of the country, they are just going to keep quiet.

The entire army of immigrant-lovers is going to at least sit this one out and they might actually come to our aid in saying that this is a billionaire scheme to drive down wages. Obviously, third world immigration is the same thing, but again, that doesn’t affect them, so they don’t care.

People’s political views are always driven by the things that affect them, the things they care about. People weigh these things, and put different values on them. The value of “I’m a good person so I support what the TV says” is much higher for liberals than conservatives (although conservatives do this with Israel and Jews, so the conservative willingness to do this is not zero). But when an issue becomes a reality which invades their personal space, supporting the TV thing is no longer worth it.

You saw this already with “woke,” both the black power agenda and the child tranny thing. Liberals were all-in on “I’ll support this because the TV says I’m very good if I do,” and then after a while the affects of these agendas creeped into their personal lives and though they didn’t start screaming “niggers out!” or “two genders, faggot!”, they stopped making a point of defending these agendas. The “I’m a good person, I got the head-pat and everything” dopamine hit no longer outweighed the real world consequences.

I know everyone hates white liberals, but the reality is that any time we can get them to go along with things we support, it’s objectively a good thing, and helps the overall agenda of moving the zeitgeist of society to where we want it to be.

You cannot prevent the government from doing anything. This is a democracy, meaning it doesn’t matter what you think about anything, the government can just do whatever it wants, because you have no recourse. Therefore, the only thing that matters is accumulating popular sentiment, streamlining it, and creating massive rage among the populace. Eventually that will boil over. Or maybe it won’t. Who knows. But we do know the government won’t do shit, so there is nowhere else to go but to the appeal to popular sentiment.

Anti-Indian activism is an open straightaway, nothing but blue skies.

Pedal to the metal.

]]> AI Companies Threatening to Leave California Over Jewish “Kill Switch” Regulations https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/06/10/ai-companies-threatening-to-leave-california-over-jewish-kill-switch-regulations/ Mon, 10 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0000

If they’ll leave California because states are trying to put regulations on AI, they will leave America as well.

These are not huge companies with massive numbers of employees that have to move large factories. They can move to some third world country with zero regulations if they have to.

I’m sure most of these guys like living in Silicon Valley, because that’s where they all live and it’s easy to recruit and work with others. But they’re not going to stop building AI because some government tells them they have to stop building AI.

The future is happening.

New York Post:

Artificial intelligence companies are pushing back against California state lawmakers’ demand that they install a “kill switch” designed to mitigate potential dangers posed by the new technology — with some threatening to leave Silicon Valley altogether.

Scott Wiener, a Democratic state senator, introduced legislation that would force tech companies to comply with regulations fleshed out by a new government-run agency designed to prevent AI companies from allowing their products to gain “a hazardous capability” such as starting a nuclear war.

This Jew AGAIN.

 

He’s the same Jew who is behind all of the “yes but we should be allowed to have sex with children” laws. He did solar energy and net neutrality. He supports the blacks. He invented bike lanes.

Every time some wacky thing is happening in California, it’s this same Jew pervert behind it.

Wiener and other lawmakers want to install guardrails around “extremely large” AI systems that have the potential to spit out instructions for creating disasters — such as building chemical weapons or assisting in cyberattacks — that could cause at least $500 million in damages.

The measure, supported by some of the most renowned AI researchers, would also create a new state agency to oversee developers and provide best practices, including for still-more powerful models that don’t yet exist.

The state attorney general also would be able to pursue legal actions in case of violations.

But tech firms are threatening to relocate away from California if the new legislation is enshrined into law.

The bill was passed last month by the state Senate.

A general assembly vote is scheduled for August. If it is passed, it goes to the desk of Gov. Gavin Newsom.

…

The biggest objections from tech firms to the proposal are that it will stifle innovation by deterring software engineers from taking bold risks with their products due to fears of a hypothetical scenario that may never come to pass.

None of these “hypotheticals” are actually even hypothetical.

The idea that there is any threat from AI – other than restricting its development to a few small companies and giving them and the government full control over it – is a total lie.

This “what if the AI build a chemical weapon” is like if during the 1900s, when cars were being developed, the government was like “what if cars transformed into Decepticons and tried to conquer the galaxy?

It’s all just intended to prevent people from having access to these tools which are going to democratize everything.

]]> BREAKING: Yipping Faggot and Diabolical Censor Musk Repeats Obvious Economic Observations https://www.anglinarchive.com/2023/10/24/breaking-yipping-faggot-and-diabolical-censor-musk-repeats-obvious-economic-observations/ Tue, 24 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0000

Oh, yes, yipper – how about you just say obvious points the Daily Stormer made 18 months ago, but don’t mention Jews?

This will work.

RT:

The United States has “overplayed” its hand in “weaponizing” the dollar with sanctions, pushing more countries around the world to slash transactions using the currency, Elon Mask has warned.

“You’re now seeing a lot of countries de-dollar their transactions because we’ve forced it. And this goes beyond even Russia, China, and Iran,” the owner of X (formerly Twitter) said during a Twitter Spaces session hosted by American entrepreneur David Sachs on Monday.

Musk highlighted a shift to trade in national currencies, especially among the BRICS nations, adding that it was not a choice made by these countries, but rather a necessity forced upon them by Ukraine-related Western sanctions against Moscow.

“Countries like Brazil or India still want to transact with Russia. They can’t do it with dollars, so we’ve forced them to de-dollarize their transactions, thus weakening the strength of the dollar in the world,” he explained.

The weaponization of the greenback has pushed many nations to look for alternatives, after sanctions effectively cut Russia off from the Western financial system.

The thing is – why would you even be against this?

It’s like that best ever Chinese meme from yesterday.

If you fully understand the core of international geopolitics (that’s actually a redundant term, because Chinese translators don’t work – geopolitics are international, but it sounds cute), then de-dollarization is good for the American people, and certainly good for Silicon Valley, which is hilted up on Bitcoin.

This is to say: we do not want the US government to course-correct. We want the empire to collapse, at which point, normal people and Silicon Valley futurist weirdos can seize control of the government and install some kind of strongman who serves the interests of the middle class (and normal people generally) and the industrialists to the detriment of the financial elite and military contractors.

History is so retarded and muddied up, I don’t really know if people understand that there is always a natural alliance between industrialists and normal people. What Elon and several other people from Silicon Valley are doing by reaching out to normal people is very natural. The pre-war and probably even inter-war period are defined by this industrialist-normal people alliance in opposition to finance and war profiteers.

Industrialists do not tend to be greedy in the manner of finance/war people. In part, it’s because industrialists are typically much less Jewish (look at the way the Jews ran the US auto industry – into the friggin’ ground), but it’s also the nature of the thing. Finance and war feed greed, attract greedy (even non-Jewish) people, and while industrialists are always very rich, there is not this “I have to drain every last drop of blood from the population” thinking that takes place in finance.

It’s probably because more or less all finance has to do with drinking blood, whereas industrialism, at its core, is definitely providing goods to people, and making them affordable.

Even with Bezos – he’s very rich, he seems pretty soulless, he abuses his employees and puts them in cages and won’t let them piss, but he is providing a useful service, and he does not appear to be trying to suck all of the blood out of America. He’s also not trying to fuck with people and do weird shit to them. I might actually support him for president, if that was on the table. (Weird statement, I know – but trust me, the Illness Revelations are just getting started.)

If you want to understand this better, you can listen to the All-In podcast. Chamath in particular, but also Sacks (who is obviously Jewish in genes, but not really in spirit – Sacks is who Elon was talking with when he made the above statements) are representatives of what I am talking about.

They are very, very rich, they are in no way apologetic about that, they do not want to pay taxes. But they have a sort of fundamental sympathy for normal people, which comes from the fact that they understand – on a conscious or maybe a different level – that normal people are their natural allies.

Normal people typically do not have a problem with billionaires, as long as they feel they got their money in a way that is fair and they’re not using it to try to destroy society.

I have a lot of problems with Silicon Valley people. Or, with a lot of them. Some of them I have no problem with and they send me money.

This was concerning:

That probably needs more analysis than I really have any interest in doing right now. That potentially has incredibly wide-ranging implications as regards “national populism.” We already know that Johnson was a fed, ostensibly as some kind of 77D autistic chess, but Thiel – this is totally bizarre. Don’t wait for a big analysis of that coming from me, I’m really focused on the wars, AI, bullying Elon Musk, and my religious delusions.

You know – I’ve only got two hands.

(Probably, using Cronenberg imagery as a theme for my unhinged religious delusions is too dark. I’m kinda trying to go with a poppier theme here – David Crosby vibes – but it’s just so funny. I thought of it when I woke up and chose not to work and instead go back to sleep, which resulted in the lateness this morning – “holy shit, Scanners should be the iconic aesthetic of my brain tumor-driven religious delusions” and I lost all breath laughing. It’s probably why I drank a glass of Beefeater with a lime and no ice and went back to sleep – I had exhausted myself with laughter. But yeah, I’ll probably cut it, for the most part. David Koresh is staying however. I can vaguely think I remember that David Crosby was David Koresh’s favorite musician, and maybe even that he used to sing the songs with an acoustic guitar at the compound. Don’t quote me on that. It would probably be hard to Google, and reading books to find information is so exhausting.)

By the way, I got a guitar and I’m working on a folk album. Just thought I’d throw that out there. I don’t know if it will ever be finished and released, but in theory, it will be released sometime next year, maybe as a part of the transition between the Illness Revelations and whatever comes next.

Elon Musk as a yipping chihuahua who yips and nips at people then turns to flee and starts pissing on himself and shivering might go down as the greatest of the Illness Revelations.

]]> Silicon Valley Building Utopian Fake City Project on 55,000 Acres of Land They’ve Been Buying Up https://www.anglinarchive.com/2023/09/03/silicon-valley-building-utopian-fake-city-project-on-55000-acres-of-land-theyve-been-buying-up/ Sun, 03 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0000

What makes it utopian and futuristic is the lack of youth gangs

There’s really a lot I want to say about this – even though it is just being revealed now, and there are not any details.

But it’s also Sunday, and I don’t feel like trying to say all of it right now.

Let me think about it, and you think about it, and I’ll look into it, and I’ll get back to you later.

(The obvious thing is: why would you build this in California and deal with the taxes? It would be much cheaper to just put it in Iowa and then build, you know – an airport.)

The Guardian:

The Silicon Valley elites who have been quietly buying up northern California farmland for several years have gone public with their vision for the utopian city they hope to build from scratch on 55,000 acres in Solano county.

This week the group behind the effort, Flannery Associates, launched a website for the initiative and released a series of sunny renderings showing Mediterranean-style homes and walkable and bikeable neighborhoods.

The sudden launch of a public campaign comes as the group, backed by a cohort of billionaire Silicon Valley investors, had faced growing criticism over their shadowy agenda.

Before last week, no one knew who exactly was behind the purchase of agricultural plots and empty land in south-eastern Solano county, about 60 miles from San Francisco. The land bought by the firm primarily stretches between Fairfield, home to 120,000 people as well as the Anheuser-Busch Co brewery and the Jelly Belly jelly bean factory, and the small city of Rio Vista.

In all, the group spent nearly $1bn and became the largest landowner in the county, even buying property around the nation’s busiest air force base. The mystery reportedly drew the attention of the US military and FBI.

Last week, the New York Times revealed that Flannery Associates was backed by a group of prominent Silicon Valley investors and aimed to build a new city, operated using clean energy, that would create thousands of jobs while offering residents reliable public transportation and urban living.

Jan Sramek, a 36-year-old former trader for the investment banking firm Goldman Sachs, spearheaded the project. The group of backers includes Reid Hoffman, the LinkedIn co-founder; venture capitalist Michael Moritz; Laurene Powell Jobs, the founder of the philanthropic group Emerson Collective and wife of the late Steve Jobs; Marc Andreessen, the investor and software developer; Patrick and John Collison, the sibling co-founders of the payment processor Stripe; and the entrepreneurs Daniel Gross and Nat Friedman, the Times reported.

…

On Thursday, the group laid out the vision for the land with a new website, renderings and a name – California Forever. California Forever is the parent company of Flannery Associates, founded by Sramek who, the website notes, recently purchased his first home in the county.

On the website, California Forever argued that to build a “complete, sustainable community” it needed a large settlement of land, and said it couldn’t share its plans until it finished acquiring properties to avoid “reckless short-term land speculation”.

…

Their dream is to establish a new city with homes of various sizes and costs with walkable neighborhoods close to shops and schools, and open spaces around the community, according to the website. California Forever says the project could bring “thousands of permanent, good-paying local jobs” and a large solar farm.

Aside from the California tax issue, there are several other reasons you wouldn’t want this in California, or in America.

If you’re building a self-contained city, where most people that live there will also be working, you could do it somewhere in Central or South America, where you could make enough “donations” to the government that you’d be allowed to self-govern the community.

Seriously: if people are meant to live and work there, then the only time they will be leaving is for meetings in California. And most people won’t need to do that regularly. Those who do need to do that can take planes.

Anyway – the idea of a group of investors building a new city is fascinating, even if they are doing it wrong, and it will be interesting to see it unfold. My guess is it’s going to be a disaster. I think they will also use a lot of plastic and really crappy M/I Homes type materials. (If they had put it in El Salvador, they could afford better materials.)

This pictures are ridiculous. I seriously do not think this fake city is going to look like Florence (or whatever it is these images are meant to evoke).

]]> Uber’s Korean Diversity Chief Put on Leave for Telling People to Not be Mean to White Women https://www.anglinarchive.com/2023/05/25/ubers-korean-diversity-chief-put-on-leave-for-telling-people-to-not-be-mean-to-white-women/ Thu, 25 May 2023 00:00:00 +0000

This is actually the correct decision.

No one should be nice to white women. White women are whores who deserve to be beaten up, choked-out, and raped – at best. (I used to include “and have their throats slit and be dumped in a ditch like a bag of McDonald’s wrappers,” but I’m moderating in middle age.)

I’m sick of gooks coming to my country and white knighting for these busted-ass sluts.

CNN:

Uber’s diversity chief is on leave from the company after criticism from some employees related to an internal panel called “Don’t Call Me Karen.”

Bo Young Lee, Uber’s chief diversity and inclusion officer, is on a leave of absence, Noah Edwardsen, an Uber spokesperson, confirmed to CNN on Monday.

Lee oversaw a series of sessions called “Moving Forward” at Uber that focused on issues around race, gender identity and class. One of the more recent sessions was titled, “Don’t Call Me Karen,” and focused on the experiences of a handful of women leaders, a person familiar with the matter told CNN. “Karen” is a slang term that usually refers to a middle-aged white woman with a strong sense of entitlement, often at the expense of people of color.

Lee was put on leave after a follow-up listening session in response to concerns about the “Don’t Call Me Karen” panel resulted in additional concerns, the person said.


This is considered morbidly obese in South Korea

According to the New York Times, which was first to report the news, Black and Hispanic workers at Uber first felt that organizers of the event were focusing more on the harms caused by using the moniker “Karen” than the harms white people can inflict on people of color.

In a follow-up listening session, the Times reported, some employees felt their concerns weren’t being heard and that instead of a chance to provide feedback or have a dialogue, they were lectured by Lee about their response to the initial “Don’t Call Me Karen” event.

The Times cited an internal email from Uber’s head of human resources as well as messages on the workplace tool Slack from groups for Black and Hispanic employees at Uber.

…

Lee is Uber’s first chief diversity and inclusion officer. Lee joined the ride-hailing company in 2018, shortly after Dara Khosrowshahi took over as Uber’s CEO.

Khosrowshahi was tasked with straightening out the company after Uber’s co-founder and CEO Travis Kalanick stepped down in 2017 following a seemingly endless string of PR crises for the company, including a former employee’s report of sexism and harassment in the workplace. It agreed in 2019 to a $4.4 million settlement with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission over sexual discrimination charges.

In actual reality, all of these companies are dumping their diversity officers. More than likely, this was just an excuse.

I guess we should hope white women take notice of the fact that it is against the rules to be nice to them – right???

I’m sure they’ll notice that and stop supporting every single Jewish agenda – right???

RIGHT???

No. In actual fact, they will not notice that, and they will continue to support every Jewish agenda, even if it is an agenda that is directly purposed to harm them.

White women are stupider than cockroaches. At least cockroaches know to run when someone is hovering over them and trying to smash them.

Meanwhile, in non-diverse South Korea

]]> Super-Rich People Building Underground Bunkers, Preparing for Total Collapse https://www.anglinarchive.com/2022/09/05/super-rich-people-building-underground-bunkers-preparing-for-total-collapse/ Mon, 05 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0000
Douglas Rushkoff: Physiognomy checks out. Greatest ally. Highly trustable.

Nothing that elites ever do could be bad, because there isn’t any conspiracies, so everything they always do is good, no matter what.

After all, these are the same people fighting for trans children and Ukraine Democracy. They are willing to freeze to death for to death for the Ukraine. They will cut their sons’ dicks off. Well, they won’t do it, I mean, you will be doing it, but they’re the ones who make the choice.

Douglas Rushkoff, that Jew who writes about the sociology of a technocratic society of which you are probably aware of, writes for The Guardian:

As a humanist who writes about the impact of digital technology on our lives, I am often mistaken for a futurist. The people most interested in hiring me for my opinions about technology are usually less concerned with building tools that help people live better lives in the present than they are in identifying the Next Big Thing through which to dominate them in the future. I don’t usually respond to their inquiries. Why help these guys ruin what’s left of the internet, much less civilisation?

Still, sometimes a combination of morbid curiosity and cold hard cash is enough to get me on a stage in front of the tech elite, where I try to talk some sense into them about how their businesses are affecting our lives out here in the real world. That’s how I found myself accepting an invitation to address a group mysteriously described as “ultra-wealthy stakeholders”, out in the middle of the desert.

A limo was waiting for me at the airport. As the sun began to dip over the horizon, I realised I had been in the car for three hours. What sort of wealthy hedge-fund types would drive this far from the airport for a conference? Then I saw it. On a parallel path next to the highway, as if racing against us, a small jet was coming in for a landing on a private airfield. Of course.

The next morning, two men in matching Patagonia fleeces came for me in a golf cart and conveyed me through rocks and underbrush to a meeting hall. They left me to drink coffee and prepare in what I figured was serving as my green room. But instead of me being wired with a microphone or taken to a stage, my audience was brought in to me. They sat around the table and introduced themselves: five super-wealthy guys – yes, all men – from the upper echelon of the tech investing and hedge-fund world. At least two of them were billionaires. After a bit of small talk, I realised they had no interest in the speech I had prepared about the future of technology. They had come to ask questions.

They started out innocuously and predictably enough. Bitcoin or ethereum? Virtual reality or augmented reality? Who will get quantum computing first, China or Google? Eventually, they edged into their real topic of concern: New Zealand or Alaska? Which region would be less affected by the coming climate crisis? It only got worse from there. Which was the greater threat: global warming or biological warfare? How long should one plan to be able to survive with no outside help? Should a shelter have its own air supply? What was the likelihood of groundwater contamination? Finally, the CEO of a brokerage house explained that he had nearly completed building his own underground bunker system, and asked: “How do I maintain authority over my security force after the event?” The event. That was their euphemism for the environmental collapse, social unrest, nuclear explosion, solar storm, unstoppable virus, or malicious computer hack that takes everything down.

It’s funny how Jews use “climate crisis” as a euphemism for “societal collapse.”

It’s a crisis of the social climate, mayhaps.

Jews are such rats.

This single question occupied us for the rest of the hour. They knew armed guards would be required to protect their compounds from raiders as well as angry mobs. One had already secured a dozen Navy Seals to make their way to his compound if he gave them the right cue. But how would he pay the guards once even his crypto was worthless? What would stop the guards from eventually choosing their own leader?

The billionaires considered using special combination locks on the food supply that only they knew. Or making guards wear disciplinary collars of some kind in return for their survival. Or maybe building robots to serve as guards and workers – if that technology could be developed “in time”.

I tried to reason with them. I made pro-social arguments for partnership and solidarity as the best approaches to our collective, long-term challenges. The way to get your guards to exhibit loyalty in the future was to treat them like friends right now, I explained. Don’t just invest in ammo and electric fences, invest in people and relationships. They rolled their eyes at what must have sounded to them like hippy philosophy.

This was probably the wealthiest, most powerful group I had ever encountered. Yet here they were, asking a Marxist media theorist for advice on where and how to configure their doomsday bunkers. That’s when it hit me: at least as far as these gentlemen were concerned, this was a talk about the future of technology.

Taking their cue from Tesla founder Elon Musk colonising Mars, Palantir’s Peter Thiel reversing the ageing process, or artificial intelligence developers Sam Altman and Ray Kurzweil uploading their minds into supercomputers, they were preparing for a digital future that had less to do with making the world a better place than it did with transcending the human condition altogether. Their extreme wealth and privilege served only to make them obsessed with insulating themselves from the very real and present danger of climate change, rising sea levels, mass migrations, global pandemics, nativist panic and resource depletion. For them, the future of technology is about only one thing: escape from the rest of us.

These people once showered the world with madly optimistic business plans for how technology might benefit human society. Now they’ve reduced technological progress to a video game that one of them wins by finding the escape hatch. Will it be Jeff Bezos migrating to space, Thiel to his New Zealand compound, or Mark Zuckerberg to his virtual metaverse? And these catastrophising billionaires are the presumptive winners of the digital economy – the supposed champions of the survival-of-the-fittest business landscape that’s fuelling most of this speculation to begin with.

What I came to realise was that these men are actually the losers. The billionaires who called me out to the desert to evaluate their bunker strategies are not the victors of the economic game so much as the victims of its perversely limited rules. More than anything, they have succumbed to a mindset where “winning” means earning enough money to insulate themselves from the damage they are creating by earning money in that way. It’s as if they want to build a car that goes fast enough to escape from its own exhaust.

Yet this Silicon Valley escapism – let’s call it The Mindset – encourages its adherents to believe that the winners can somehow leave the rest of us behind.

Never before have our society’s most powerful players assumed that the primary impact of their own conquests would be to render the world itself unliveable for everyone else. Nor have they ever before had the technologies through which to programme their sensibilities into the very fabric of our society. The landscape is alive with algorithms and intelligences actively encouraging these selfish and isolationist outlooks. Those sociopathic enough to embrace them are rewarded with cash and control over the rest of us. It’s a self-reinforcing feedback loop. This is new.

Amplified by digital technologies and the unprecedented wealth disparity they afford, The Mindset allows for the easy externalisation of harm to others, and inspires a corresponding longing for transcendence and separation from the people and places that have been abused.

Instead of just lording over us for ever, however, the billionaires at the top of these virtual pyramids actively seek the endgame. In fact, like the plot of a Marvel blockbuster, the very structure of The Mindset requires an endgame. Everything must resolve to a one or a zero, a winner or loser, the saved or the damned. Actual, imminent catastrophes from the climate emergency to mass migrations support the mythology, offering these would-be superheroes the opportunity to play out the finale in their own lifetimes. For The Mindset also includes a faith-based Silicon Valley certainty that they can develop a technology that will somehow break the laws of physics, economics and morality to offer them something even better than a way of saving the world: a means of escape from the apocalypse of their own making.

…

Many of those seriously seeking a safe haven simply hire one of several prepper construction companies to bury a prefab steel-lined bunker somewhere on one of their existing properties. Rising S Company in Texas builds and installs bunkers and tornado shelters for as little as $40,000 for an 8ft by 12ft emergency hideout all the way up to the $8.3m luxury series “Aristocrat”, complete with pool and bowling lane. The enterprise originally catered to families seeking temporary storm shelters, before it went into the long-term apocalypse business. The company logo, complete with three crucifixes, suggests their services are geared more toward Christian evangelist preppers in red-state America than billionaire tech bros playing out sci-fi scenarios.

There’s something much more whimsical about the facilities in which most of the billionaires – or, more accurately, aspiring billionaires – actually invest. A company called Vivos is selling luxury underground apartments in converted cold war munitions storage facilities, missile silos, and other fortified locations around the world. Like miniature Club Med resorts, they offer private suites for individuals or families, and larger common areas with pools, games, movies and dining. Ultra-elite shelters such as the Oppidum in the Czech Republic claim to cater to the billionaire class, and pay more attention to the long-term psychological health of residents. They provide imitation of natural light, such as a pool with a simulated sunlit garden area, a wine vault, and other amenities to make the wealthy feel at home.

On closer analysis, however, the probability of a fortified bunker actually protecting its occupants from the reality of, well, reality, is very slim. For one, the closed ecosystems of underground facilities are preposterously brittle. For example, an indoor, sealed hydroponic garden is vulnerable to contamination. Vertical farms with moisture sensors and computer-controlled irrigation systems look great in business plans and on the rooftops of Bay Area startups; when a palette of topsoil or a row of crops goes wrong, it can simply be pulled and replaced. The hermetically sealed apocalypse “grow room” doesn’t allow for such do-overs.

Just the known unknowns are enough to dash any reasonable hope of survival. But this doesn’t seem to stop wealthy preppers from trying. The New York Times reported that real estate agents specialising in private islands were overwhelmed with inquiries during the Covid-19 pandemic. Prospective clients were even asking about whether there was enough land to do some agriculture in addition to installing a helicopter landing pad. But while a private island may be a good place to wait out a temporary plague, turning it into a self-sufficient, defensible ocean fortress is harder than it sounds. Small islands are utterly dependent on air and sea deliveries for basic staples. Solar panels and water filtration equipment need to be replaced and serviced at regular intervals. The billionaires who reside in such locales are more, not less, dependent on complex supply chains than those of us embedded in industrial civilisation.

Surely the billionaires who brought me out for advice on their exit strategies were aware of these limitations. Could it have all been some sort of game? Five men sitting around a poker table, each wagering his escape plan was best?

But if they were in it just for fun, they wouldn’t have called for me. They would have flown out the author of a zombie apocalypse comic book. If they wanted to test their bunker plans, they’d have hired a security expert from Blackwater or the Pentagon. They seemed to want something more. Their language went far beyond questions of disaster preparedness and verged on politics and philosophy: words such as individuality, sovereignty, governance and autonomy.

That’s because it wasn’t their actual bunker strategies I had been brought out to evaluate so much as the philosophy and mathematics they were using to justify their commitment to escape. They were working out what I’ve come to call the insulation equation: could they earn enough money to insulate themselves from the reality they were creating by earning money in this way? Was there any valid justification for striving to be so successful that they could simply leave the rest of us behind –apocalypse or not?

Or was this really their intention all along? Maybe the apocalypse is less something they’re trying to escape than an excuse to realise The Mindset’s true goal: to rise above mere mortals and execute the ultimate exit strategy.

So, look: you should be aware of what these Jews are saying.

And you should be aware that they’re not just saying it at the World Economic Forum – they’re just publishing it in the Guardian.

Of course, the WEF is not secretive anymore – they post all of their panels on their YouTube channel, and post all their white papers on their official website.

But publishing in the Guardian means they want the goyim to know – I guess?

There’s no other obvious reason.

Saying it’s about global warming – those rascals. It’s just almost too much.

]]> Asian OnlyFans Skank Says She had Sex with Multiple Instagram Employees to Get Her Account Unbanned https://www.anglinarchive.com/2022/05/22/asian-onlyfans-skank-says-she-had-sex-with-multiple-instagram-employees-to-get-her-account-unbanned/ Sun, 22 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000

Paging Taylor Lorenz!

This bitch from LA, an Asian OnlyFans slut called Kitty Lixo, said on a podcast earlier this month that after being banned from instagram for slutting it too hard, she was able to get her account back by having sex with employees at instagram.

On the No Jumper podcast, she said she stalked an instagram employee using her backup account, and then started having sex with him, and he reinstated her account. “Which was really nice of him,” she said.

It’s not totally clear – the woman is clearly on drugs on the podcast, or maybe just very stupid – but she implies she’s had sex with multiple instagram employees for favors. I think she says that she had sex with one guy and got her account back, then she lost it again, so she went to his LinkedIn and found his co-workers and started having sex with different people from the company. She also says something about the “Asian community.”

In any normal world, this would be the biggest sex and corruption scandal in Silicon Valley. Instead, we are talking about some Elon Musk hoax – because all of these sex scandals are political, and the fact that Mark Zuckerberg hires people who will accept sex in exchange for moderation and censorship changes.

I guess it’s somewhat different because she’s Asian, and Asian women can’t really do feminism, so she just thinks this is normal behavior to trade sex with men for favors. In fact it actually is normal, and everything that all those whores who had sex with Weinstein did was exactly the same thing.

There is a reason they call hooking “the oldest profession.” A man can offer to work the fields, chop the trees, care for the horses, join the hunting party, etc. He can also kill someone and take the things he needs from them. Conversely, there’s only one thing a woman can offer in exchange for material goods. So this is just basic biology. That doesn’t mean it’s good – in fact, this is why we invented marriage. But it is what it is.

If you talked really, really slowly, you could probably explain to an Asian skank how it is somehow “abuse” if she initiates sex in exchange for material favors. But there just doesn’t seem to be any interest in doing this. Maybe it’s thought that if you started getting Asians involved in these metoo scams everything could end up spinning off the rails.

Westerners tried to get that Chinese tennis bitch to do a metoo scandal after she spent years having sex with a high-ranking government official, and the entire country of China was calling for her to be put in prison for slander and defamation. She had to go into hiding because of Chinese internet trolls – who believe you me, are a lot more hardcore than American internet trolls ever were.

Asians have a disposition that can only be compared to what we think of as autism, where they just can’t process these weird ideas that whites have come up with. The idea that becoming a millionaire movie star in exchange for having sex with one fat Jew is a bad deal, or that the Jew is culpable for some kind of crime, simply wouldn’t process.

Frankly, we should ask Asians the way they view things in order to connect back to basic human nature and logic. Whites have spun off into this Baudrillardian world of symbols of symbols of symbols, abstractions of abstractions, and no one has any idea what is real anymore.

What is real: a woman only has one thing to sell, so if you’re going to abolish marriage in the family, she’s going to sell it where she can sell it.

Of course, the principle also applies to everything else: we would do well to step back from these idiotic delusions about “human rights democracy” and ask the Chinese what they think of power politics. Of course, all “human rights democracy” actually is is power politics – we are literally in a fake war with Russia and instead of saying we are at war with Russia, the government claims that seizing territory from Russia is somehow about :human rights democracy values in a rules-based order.” You’re fighting a war, but the symbols of the war are obfuscated in the minds of the people, so shooting and killing becomes not about power but morality.

Imagine a situation where your family is starving and the family next door has food, so you go and kill the neighbors to take their food. Is that moral? No, not really. It is on the other hand necessary. You had the power to kill and you did so for your own benefit. Because survival comes first.

Of course, the American Empire isn’t in a survival situation, and they are in fact on some strange mission of global conquest. But the concept is the same: justifying violence and theft in the trappings of vague morality is delusional and ridiculous, and leads to a disconnect from the realities of violence and struggle.

]]> Zuckerberg Announces Bizarre Virtual Reality Tranny Future for the Goyim https://www.anglinarchive.com/2021/10/29/zuckerberg-announces-bizarre-virtual-reality-tranny-future-for-the-goyim/ Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0000
This image from Mark Zuckerberg’s Thursday event more or less summarizes the entire image of the future. “If you want a picture of the future, imagine a fat hook-nosed Paki strapping a VR headset on a fat white bitch – forever.”

No one is really saying anything meaningful about Facebook’s transition into a platform for virtual reality.

Namely, we should be discussing the fact that this “Metaverse” plan is clearly a design for a future where people have brain implants and live most of their lives in virtual reality. Moreover, both the government and the corporations want this future for a peasant population which is now viewed as useless due to the coming age of AI and automation.

On Friday, Mark Zuckerberg held an hour-long event called “Connect 2021.” He officially announced the rebranding, and showed a dream world for trannies, fatties, pick-up artists, atheists, and others looking to escape this physical reality.

Zuck described “Meta” as “the next evolution of social connection.”

As most of our gamers are probably aware, the type of virtual reality that this implies doesn’t really work very well. Most people can only play with an Oculus Rift or a Steam Index for 15-20 minutes without vomiting. It’s simply an obvious fact that these people are planning to put computer chips into the brains of the peasantry, and this new manifestation of Facebook is intended to be an advertisement for the world that people can escape to if they are willing to take the chip.

In a future that the Silicon Valley transhumanists view as not-too-distant, Facebook can even use your body to perform various menial tasks while your consciousness has escaped to a virtual world. But that’s mostly where the Matrix analogies end. Human beings would not really make good batteries, as they did in the Matrix films. For the most part, the elite is currently in the process of figuring out how to wipe us out, rather than use us for any purpose at all.

Meta is not going to replace Facebook, but will be a new parent company for Facebook, instagram and WhatsApp, in the way that Alphabet is a parent company for Google and their other properties.

Sadly, the remaining commentariat on Twitter is so benign that they cannot offer any meaningful comment on this subject. What I am learning however is just how hostile the Democrats have become to Facebook, following their narrative assertion that Facebook doesn’t censor enough.

For context, the current demand of the Democrats is that all Trump supporters (or former Trump supporters, in the case of most of us) be completely silenced. That is, they are asking Zuck to ban more than half of the American population.

Jack as always was looking for a place to seem cool without being an absolute tool.

I don’t really understand who his narrative that “I’m not an evil corporation” is designed to serve. Anyone who would support that narrative has already been banned by his company’s pink-hairs and ADL appointees.

Democrats like the idea of mega-corporations in principle, they just want them to do more censorship. If there’s one thing that cannot be posted enough with regards to this topic, it’s AOC’s Open Secrets page. In 2020, her top corporate donors were Google and Amazon.

That hasn’t changed much during the current cycle (updated as of the end of September).

Woke progressivism is as much a product of the corporations as it is of the media. Traditionally, the left would be the ones questioning corporate power. That tendency is completely neutered by this transformation of the left from being about economic policies to focusing on bizarre and deranged social crusades. It costs Silicon Valley corporations nothing to throw up rainbow blacks and black power fists.

Meanwhile, the right is too stupid to question corporate power, even when it is aligned against them. They’ve been totally brainwashed with the idea that any form of government regulation on corporations is a form of communism, even while they’ve been completely incapable of getting any corporation to apply these values of “deregulation” to small businesses. This dichotomy was on full display during the height of the 2020 virus hoax, when all small businesses were closed by government decree, but Amazon’s business was unimpeded.

Tucker Carlson took issue with this situation, pointing out that the Amazon Washington Post was one of the key entities pushing for the virus restrictions, which was destroying Amazon’s competition, and really completely destroying any remaining notion of free enterprise in America.

Famously, Sean Hannity attacked Tucker, defending this operation by Bezos as morally justifiable according to “our values” and “who we are” principles.

That came after Tucker, in 2017, had brought on a critic of his anti-Amazon statements, an our values objectivist conservative law professor named Amy Peikoff.

Irony of Ironies, Peikoff became the Chief Policy Officer at Parler, which was of course kicked off the internet by Amazon Web Services.

It’s almost as if libertarianism is incompatible with the Bill of Rights and the most basic individual freedoms! That’s of course a much longer conversation, but the point is: the American right-wing has been mired in libertarian gibberish since the 1980s, and they’re not going to be able to reverse course on that in time to push back against these tech corporations. So it was just basic business logic for these corporations to embrace woke politics, thereby ensuring that any movement against them is impossible.

Dave Rubin, a homosexual Jew who is serving as controlled opposition for the right-wingers who are opposed to corporate domination (all legitimate opposition has already been banned by the corporations, of course), almost said something that mattered.

But the Matrix analogy doesn’t work. They want us locked in our rooms eating bugs before we die off from the vax program. They don’t want us to be batteries. They are building a world where they will need much less energy, because there will be many fewer people.

The current leftist opposition against Facebook will be resolved peacefully. What they are demanding is more censorship. Censorship is bad for Facebook’s business model, but they’ve already done so much of it that a little more won’t mean much.

The one fatal flaw of the Silicon Valley transhumanist agenda is that they are allowing the Washington crazies to manage the war with the Chinese. China makes this entire future that they’ve planned so meticulously nonviable.

For the Lord will send a Great Dragon to breathe fire and incinerate all of their demented schemes.

From the ashes, a new order will arise, based on the core values of True Sino-Friendship.

At some point, I’m going to have to write a long article explaining what the Fourth Industrial Revolution is, and documenting the fact that Transhumanism is a religion in Silicon Valley.

]]> Google Censors Pro-Monarchy Movement in Thailand https://www.anglinarchive.com/2021/06/29/google-censors-pro-monarchy-movement-in-thailand/ Tue, 29 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0000

Hi @GoogleThailand, dozens of people are being targeted with a Google Maps document that includes their address and photos and accuses them of being anti-monarchy. You need to deal with this ASAP before someone is killed. DM me please pic.twitter.com/LZFa2hyqVV

— Andrew MacGregor Marshall (@zenjournalist) June 28, 2021

The entire weird and nonsensical revolution in Thailand was created by Silicon Valley – so it’s no surprise that Google is actively censoring pro-monarchy activists.

RT:

The technology giant has deleted two maps created by a group of royal supporters that leaked the personal data and addresses of hundreds of citizens deemed to be promoting anti-monarchy sentiment – a crime in Thailand.

The company removed the maps on Monday, on the grounds that doxxing was not in line with Google Map’s intended usage: “We have clear policies about what’s acceptable for user-generated My Maps content. We remove user-generated maps that violate our policies.”

Journalist Andrew MacGregor Marshall, a published expert on the Thai monarchy, earlier called on Google Thailand to “deal with this before someone is killed.”

Of course – liberal white journalists are in Thailand attempting to overthrow their traditional culture in the name of brown people liberation.

That always happens.

Thailand needs to shut down the internet and bring in the Chinese military to fix this situation.

That is the only obvious solution.

Otherwise, on a long enough timeline, Silicon Valley wins. They overthrow the Thai government and the Thai culture and install their own system.

Silicon Valley is also using stupid young people, homosexuals and women to overthrow the government of eSwatini right now.

Why does any country allow these tech companies to do this?

Do you know that Russia still hasn’t banned Twitter?

What about freedom and defending the will of the people?

Governments have a duty to ban this foreign meddling and protect their nation’s sovereignty – and yet they all refuse!

Except China!

]]> Apple Fires New Employee After One Month Because of Mean Things He Wrote in a Book https://www.anglinarchive.com/2021/05/15/apple-fires-new-employee-after-one-month-because-of-mean-things-he-wrote-in-a-book/ Sat, 15 May 2021 00:00:00 +0000

I’m no businessman myself, but hiring and firing people at your multigazillion-dollar corporation based on feelings seems like a bad idea.

So much for “capitalism” being the driving force behind society, huh?

CNN:

Apple parted ways with a new employee this week after thousands of workers petitioned the company to investigate how it hired the man, who had previously published an autobiography they said contains misogynistic statements.

Antonio García Martínez, formerly a product manager for ad targeting at Facebook as well as the author of the 2016 autobiography “Chaos Monkeys: Obscene Fortune and Random Failure in Silicon Valley,” joined Apple’s ads team in April, according to his LinkedIn profile.

García Martínez’s book chronicles his life in the San Francisco Bay Area’s tech scene from 2010 to 2014. He began his career as a quantitative strategist for Goldman Sachs before leaving for Silicon Valley, where he eventually started an ad-tech startup, AdGrok, which he later sold to Twitter. He worked as a product manager at Facebook between 2011 and 2013. In addition to his book, García Martínez has written for publications including Wired.

On Monday, Business Insider noted García Martínez’s new position, citing his LinkedIn profile. By Tuesday evening, some Apple employees began circulating an internal “letter of concern,” citing several of García Martínez’s passages in “Chaos Monkeys” as problematic. The employees argued, in a letter viewed by CNN Business, that the passages are in direct opposition to Apple’s commitment to inclusion.

*Problematic*

How are they still using that word after having been mocked to the extent that they’ve been mocked?

To illustrate their point, the letter — which was first reported on by tech news site The Verge on Wednesday after it accumulated more than 2,000 employees’ signatures — included excerpts from his writing.

“Most women in the Bay Area are soft and weak, cosseted and naive despite their claims of worldliness, and generally full of s**t,” read a sentence in one passage from “Chaos Monkeys.” It continued, “They have their self-regarding entitlement feminism, and ceaselessly vaunt their independence, but the reality is, come the epidemic plague or foreign invasion, they’d become precisely the sort of useless baggage you’d trade for a box of shotgun shells or a jerry can of diesel.”

Based.

Another book excerpt cited in the letter detailed startup funding, and included this sentence: “To make an analogy, a capped note is like having to seduce five women one after the other, while an equity round is having to convince five women to do a sixsome with you.”

“We are profoundly distraught by what this hire means for Apple’s commitment to its inclusion goals, as well as its real and immediate impact on those working near Mr. García Martínez. It calls into question parts of our system of inclusion at Apple, including hiring panels, background checks, and our process to ensure our existing culture of inclusion is strong enough to withstand individuals who don’t share our inclusive values,” read the letter.

It also demanded the company investigate how García Martínez’s “published views on women and people of color were missed or ignored” in the hiring process and come up with a “clear plan of action to prevent this from happening again.”

“Given Mr. García Martínez’s history of publishing overtly racist and sexist remarks about his former colleagues, we are concerned that his presence at Apple will contribute to an unsafe working environment for our colleagues who are at risk of public harassment and private bullying,” the letter also said.

García Martínez did not immediately respond to a request for comment from CNN Business, though he did appear to view a direct message sent to his verified Twitter profile.

CNN Business (then known as CNN Money) reviewed “Chaos Monkeys” in June 2016, saying at the time that it reads as if it’s four years worth of “Medium posts from a scorned man.”

Yes.

I’m sure you said that, CNN.

But why didn’t you warn Apple?

Seems like you hold some responsibility here too, frankly.

Sigh

The entire Western world is now built on computers. Computer programming, because it is about building something, has been a masculine activity.

If they have decided they are going to cleanse the tech world of masculinity, it is unclear how they are going to keep the civilization running.

We’ve been seeing this for years now – first Linus Torvolds was attacked for being mean and forced out of his own project, then forced to submit to the whim of the blacks and women. More recently, Richard Stallman was forced out of something or other for writing “misogynist” statements.

Sure, there might be a handful of feminine nerds who are good at computers, but they are the minority compared to men who are going to be at the very least sexist if not outright racist and anti-Semitic. All of these negative “isms” are associated with testosterone, you see. So if you’re trying to cleanse the space of sexism, racism, anti-Semitism, homophobia, and so on, you are de facto trying to cleanse the space of masculinity, and therefore de facto trying to cleanse the space of creativity.

Can computer systems run without creativity? I don’t think so, no.

Can modern Western civilization run without complex computer systems? Also no.

Marxism really is just about destroying civilization itself.

]]>