Your average female in the modern day workplace.

The whole concept of having women in the workplace is a sick joke. The average modern day career woman is not good at her job. They only have their jobs because of Jewish affirmative action policies that forced employers to hire women. Worse yet is how employers have been forced to promote women into managerial positions they didn’t deserve so they aren’t sued for discrimination.

The government forcing private companies to hire women is a kind of tax. They are forcing these companies to subsidize these women’s lives. If a true meritocracy were in place, none of these women would be employed, because men would be doing all of their jobs. That’s because your average man is always better than your average woman at performing and completing tasks.

Most working women today will either manage other people’s work or find a way to get men to do their work for them. They will also create all sorts of pointless drama and gossip about useless nonsense. Some will fuck their male bosses in order to gain favored status. All of this bullshit caused by working women greatly decreases the overall productivity of any organization.

A recent survey has revealed just how toxic women are inside the workplace. What’s notable is how toxic they are to other women.

Daily Mail:

Imagine turning up to work every day knowing the person sitting opposite you is doing everything in their power to push you out of your job.

That was the shocking reality for Naomi Joy, a 30-year-old former PR director from London, who witnessed and experienced ‘toxic femininity’ throughout her career.

She reveals one female colleague in her thirties once declared everyone in the office ‘hated her’, while another tricked her into making a mistake so that she would be favourite for a promotion.

It eventually led to Naomi quitting her job and penning The Liars, a psychological thriller about two rivals competing for a promotion, inspired by her own shocking experience.

While researching her book, she conducted a survey of 1,000 employed British women and found more than half claimed to have been sabotaged at work by another member of the so-called sisterhood, while more than a third (37 per cent) said they’d actually felt scared or threatened by a female colleague.

Wow, imagine that.

Women are being regularly sabotaged and threatened by their female colleagues.

So much for women supporting other women in the workplace. That concept is a fantasy created by radical feminists like Sheryl Sandberg, who have been brainwashing women into thinking that they can all become highly paid corporate executives.

The Jewish Facebook executive Sheryl Sandberg has been one of the most prominent public figures who have been conning young women into believing that they can only be happy if they have some bullshit “career.”

The results of this survey should not be a surprise to anybody who understands the fundamental realities of female nature. Women are constantly competing with other women in order to acquire resources from men. Specifically, older women view younger, more attractive women as threats to them obtaining these resources. That’s why we see this type of crazy dynamic between females in the modern day workplace.

It’s also worth mentioning that the presence of women is an unnecessary and unwelcome distraction for men who are trying to get actual work done. Their presence has introduced weird nonsense like “sexual harassment” into the societal lexicon. Women can even get men fired from their jobs by making up false “sexual harassment” or “rape” claims. Women have basically turned the modern day workplace into a clown show.

Companies could eliminate “sexual harassment” if they only hired men.

There is simply no logical reason why women should be in the workplace. Being a so-called “independent career woman” does not bring women happiness. This survey proves conclusively that women are generally unhappy in the workplace. If women were truly happy working some dumb corporate slave job, they would not be sabotaging and threatening their female co-workers like this. It shows that many of these women are miserable working a 9-to-5 job and hate their life. They even try to spread their misery to others.

Unfortunately, many millennial women have been totally conned by Jewish feminism. They’ve been convinced to trade their peak fertility years when they should be starting a family to instead start a “career.” They are condemning themselves to a life of misery by doing this. That’s because women only have a small window of time to attract a quality man before they hit the proverbial wall. The fact that women can’t see how dumb of a choice this is, proves that they are incapable of logical decision making.

This survey shows that it is time to ban women from the workplace entirely. Prohibiting them from pursuing a “career” would go a long way towards increasing the happiness of women and increasing the overall work productivity of men.

Jews really don’t want people to have fun, and since people loved the video of Brenton Tarrant’s mosque visit, Facebook wants to make it harder for further mosque visits to be live-streamed.

New York Post:

Two weeks after a crazed gunman broadcast himself slaughtering 50 people in New Zealand on Facebook, the social network giant says it’s putting in new restrictions on livestreaming.

“We have heard feedback that we must do more – and we agree,” Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg wrote to the New Zealand Herald amid worldwide outrage over the horrific footage taken from shooter Brenton Tarrant’s helmet camera at two mosques March 15.

“In the wake of the terror attack, we are taking three steps: strengthening the rules for using Facebook Live, taking further steps to address hate on our platforms, and supporting the New Zealand community.”

Facebook found more than 900 versions of the video showing portions of the 17-minute broadcast, Sandberg revealed, after it previously claimed users did not report the video until 12 minutes after the livestreaming ended.

She said the company is weighing limiting access to Facebook Live for those who have violated its “community” standards and is working on how to respond faster when disturbing footage is aired.

They’re in a pretty tough spot now because every measure that could be used to fight the livestreaming of mosque visits and the spreading of those videos could also be used and abused to shut down legitimate livestreams by trolls and whatnot.

Any measure that would make it easier to shut down a live-stream of forbidden mosque behavior would also make it easier to shut down what Facebook considers legitimate livestreams. If they put hundreds of thousands of livestream moderators sitting and waiting to check and review reported livestreams in real time, they’d lose money and the issue wouldn’t even be fixed, because none of the approximately 200 people who watched Brenton Tarrant’s video live reported it before it ended. They can’t depend on viewers flagging the video nor on any type of real-time report, and they can’t depend on AI because AI just isn’t there yet.

Besides being impossible to stop, trying to stop it is also stupid and pointless. Fewer deaths don’t occur if the livestream gets shut down in two minutes instead of seven minutes. And if killing Moslems is really as horrible as Sandberg and her tribe wants you to believe, they should want people to see it so they understand how terrible it is.

So, unless Sandberg is just trying to lean in on Pewds…

…then announcing that she’s “working” towards keeping Brentons from Tarranting is just a front for her real censorship agenda.

From Sheryl Sandberg’s letter to the New Zealand Herald:

Second, we are taking even stronger steps to remove hate on our platforms. We have long had policies against hate groups and hate speech.

We designated both shootings as terror attacks, meaning that any praise, support and representation of the events violates our Community Standards and is not permitted on Facebook.

We are also using our existing artificial intelligence tools to identify and remove a range of hate groups in Australia and New Zealand, including the Lads Society, the United Patriots Front, the Antipodean Resistance, and National Front New Zealand.

These groups will be banned from our services, and we will also remove praise and support of these groups when we become aware of it. And just this week we announced that we have strengthened our policies by banning praise, support and representation of white nationalism and separatism on Facebook and Instagram.

Yes, earlier this week, they announced that they banned “praise, support and representation of white nationalism and separatism.”

Now they’re also banning “hate groups” that may or may not have anything to do with white nationalism, separatism or whiteness and instead may just be against the Moslem takeover of New Zealand.

Being against Moslem immigration is relatively acceptable among normal people, who generally agree that Moslems are incompatible with “Western values” by pointing out the obvious Islam issues with Islam including terrorism, legal rape of non-Moslems, child brides, killing faggots, torture and stoning, and so on and so forth. A lot of really cucky people support a total ban on Moslems. Banning being against Moslem immigration is basically just a boomer ban.

They’ll likely do the same for other “hate groups” outside of New Zealand, eventually.

We’re nearing the point where expressing thoughts against giving up your wealth and your land and your people’s wealth and your people’s land to browns and blacks will be against the law.

Think of a WarCraft II type of scenario except your government is working for the invaders and the invader’s governments are also working for the invaders, and most of your people are brainwashed into also working for the invaders.

Pretty much everyone’s working for the invaders, except for you and a bunch of guys wearing Space Marines and Inquisition armor writing about how everyone’s working for the invaders.

Don’t let that discourage you though. This is a kind of game, so learn to play. Also learn to code.

Basically just get in the fucking robot and fight with us.

The mainstream media is now openly asking if the Jewish enterprise of Facebook is finished. That’s because the company has been dealing with multiple scandals in what has become a continuous public relations disaster for the social media giant.

Facebook, YouTube and Twitter have collectively become an incredibly corrosive force on our culture. It is no coincidence that Jews are at the center of all these social media behemoths. That’s because Jews are involved with every corrosive force plaguing Western civilization. This is a simple objective fact for anybody willing to be honest with themselves.

Facebook’s top two people are Jews. The CEO is the Jew Mark Zuckerberg and the COO is the Jewess Sheryl Sandberg. YouTube’s CEO is the Jewess Susan Wojcicki. Twitter might not be run by a Jew, but its CEO Jack Dorsey has allowed the Jews at the Anti-Defamation League to dictate who is and who isn’t allowed on the site. So effectively, the three largest social media sites on the Internet are Jewish enterprises.

These sites are ruining the Internet. Instead of empowering the free flow of information, they have served to stifle it through political censorship. Instead of protecting user privacy they have deliberately trafficked user data for profit. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg.

Specifically, Facebook is starting to run into serious trouble. Mainstream media outlets like the Independent, are running articles asking if the company is finished. This comes following revelations that Facebook was selling the private messages of their users to third parties. There is a very real prospect that they will face massive lawsuits over this.

But that’s just been the most recent scandal of many scandals surrounding Facebook. WIRED documented 21 separate Facebook scandals in 2018 alone. They’ve been mired in so many scandals that it’s been almost impossible to keep track of them. Suffice to say, they have managed to piss off people from all sides of the political spectrum due to the sheer scale of their unethical behavior.

Of course none of this is a surprise if you understand the general behavior of Jews. A company whose top leadership consists of Jews is one that you should expect not to have a moral compass. They took a product which could have theoretically been a good thing for the world and chose to exploit their users for maximum shekels. They cared nothing about the consequences.

They’ve effectively killed the goose that laid the golden egg.  This is reflected in the value of their stock which has lost around a third of its value over the past year.

The future definitely does not look good for Facebook. This is further evidenced by the fact that young people are choosing not to use it. They view Facebook as something that old people use. And it’s probably fair to say that Facebook stopped being cool back in the 00s. Or if we are to be generous, it may have reached peak cool when the Facebook based film “The Social Network” came out in 2010. That film not surprisingly was written by the Jew Aaron Sorkin and starred the Jews Jesse Eisenberg and Andrew Garfield.

The big question is, how many more scandals are we going to see before Facebook and these other social media behemoths face the full wrath of government regulation? Major action is justified and long overdue – and now both sides of the political spectrum are calling for it.

President Trump needs to get on this immediately before all of his supporters get banned from these sites. It is patently ridiculous that the entire digital public square is under the control of highly unethical Jews. Especially when one analyzes how they are managing these operations.

If there’s any good news, it is that the world of technology is rapidly evolving. MySpace was the industry standard back in the early 00s and now nobody uses it.

Could Facebook suffer the same fate? It is not outside the realm of possibilities.

The Jewess Sheryl Sandberg is saying all the right things, but she really needs to start backing up her support of the #MeToo movement with substantive actions.

It is not often that Jews and Nazis agree, but there are always exceptions. It looks like we have one such exception here. The Jewish Chief Operating Officer of Facebook Sheryl Sandberg is saying that the #MeToo movement hasn’t gone far enough. We couldn’t agree more with this statement.

Bloomberg:

Facebook Inc. Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg says the #MeToo movement, which has spurred women to share stories of sexual harassment, can spark lasting change in workplace policies and culture.

“The question is not if #MeToo has gone too far, but if #MeToo has gone far enough,” Sandberg said on Bloomberg Television. “Because it can’t just be a moment in time, where people raise their voice. These brave women who have raised their voices, they want longstanding change.”

Sandberg, who has long advocated for women in leadership roles, said there needs to be institutional policies that prevent harassment, and a system of due process when it does happen. Most of all, she said, “we need to end the culture of complicity” — people’s instinct to look the other way rather than get involved. “We’re all responsible for what goes on in the workforce,” she added.

Even though we appreciate Sandberg’s comments, she has not used her high level position at Facebook to implement any sort of long lasting change.

The only way for the #MeToo movement to succeed is if we force all males and especially White males out of the corporate world. This is especially true in the technology field. White males will frequently distract female workers from doing substantive work. That’s because White males are constantly looking for different ways to hit on and grope female workers. Some times they will even try to muh dik an unsuspecting female in her office cubicle. This causes a great deal of anxiety for women who are doing serious company work. The anxiety that these men create for women causes them to gossip and cause needless drama at the workplace. They would not be doing these things if it wasn’t for the men they work with. By removing men from the workplace, we will not only eliminate sexual harassment, but companies will be far more productive with highly focused women at the helm.

Sandberg might talk a good game, but she fails to back up her words with substantive action. Facebook’s workforce is still dominated by males. This creates an environment ripe for sexual harassment of productive female workers. Sandberg as Chief Operating Officer needs to begin replacing these men with women until Facebook has an all female workforce. If Mark Zuckerberg the Jewish CEO of the company complains, all Sandberg has to do is accuse him of trying to grab her pussy five years ago or something. The board of directors will force him out on these allegations alone.

Sandberg could #MeToo the Zuck on this photo alone. Look at the inappropriate touching. 

Hopefully Sandberg starts taking action soon. As far as we are concerned, #MeToo can never go far enough. We need to eliminate sexual harassment from the Jewish corporate world and that can be done by replacing all men and especially White men with intelligent and empowered female workers.

So what’s the matter Sheryl? Are you afraid to lean in or what? This is the second time we have called you out for not taking the #MeToo movement seriously. Sure, you could take the cowards way out and call the #MeToo movement anti-Semitic, but we know you won’t do that. That’s because we all know that you are a highly honorable Jewish woman!

The Jewish Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg has simply not done enough to end sexual harassment in the workplace. For instance, why does she continue to allow men to work at Facebook? So long as men are in the workplace, sexual harassment of women will only continue.

Sheryl Sandberg, a Jewish female worth over a billion dollars, is rightly upset that this ongoing #MeToo campaign against sexual harassment could backfire and be detrimental to women.

She even told some sad tales about how she herself was victimized by sexual harassment. A married man offered her “career advice” and a man put their hand on her leg at a meeting! Can you imagine how terrible these experiences were for her? This type of thing should not happen in the modern workplace!

Fast Company:

This is why we can’t have nice things. In the wake of the #MeToo campaign, Sheryl Sandberg is worried that there might be a backlash–against women.

The Facebook COO posted a lengthy message on Facebook (natch), where she waded into the tidal wave of sexual harassment and assault accusations that have captured headlines lately. In her post, Sandberg wrote about her own experiences with harassment, including “a hand on my leg under the table at a meeting,” married men offering “career advice” “alone late at night” and, most alarming, a man at a conference who came to her hotel room late at night and banged on her door until she called security. So Sandberg, too, is ready for a change:

“Sexual harassment has been tolerated for far too long in the halls of government and companies large and small. For the first time in my professional life, it feels like people are finally prepared to hold perpetrators responsible. I’m cheering.”

That said, she is also worried about workplace repercussions that could limit the opportunities women have in their careers. “I have already heard the rumblings of a backlash: ‘This is why you shouldn’t hire women,’” she wrote. “Actually, this is why you should.”

“We need systemic, lasting changes that deter bad behavior and protect everyone,” she wrote, noting that in her book, Lean In, a majority of senior male managers told her they were afraid to be alone with a female colleague, over fear of sexual harassment accusations. “Doing right by women in the workplace does not just mean treating them with respect. It also means not isolating or ignoring them,” Sandberg wrote, encouraging men not to “just hire women,” but to “mentor, advise, and promote them,” too.

That’s right Sheryl, so long as men are in the workplace, they are only going to oppress and sexually harass women. Even though you aren’t saying this outright, we know that this is how you really feel. That’s just the way it is and that’s the way it will always be. Therefore you should lead by example and actually do something about this problem at Facebook.

As Chief Operating Officer of the company you are in a unique position to make an impact. You need to tell Mark Zuckerberg that Facebook must fully embrace feminism or it won’t survive into the future. This means Facebook needs to immediately fire all of their male employees and only hire talented female software engineers and programmers. There should be specific attention paid to hiring female software engineers of color. After all, we wouldn’t want Facebook to be criticized for racism.

But seriously, female software engineers of color are definitely the most talented. There are many of them here in Lagos. I can give you some references. In fact, I would say that women of color should represent 50 percent of Facebook’s new hires at minimum.

Look at all these men in this photo. Just think of how efficient Facebook’s workforce could actually be if they got rid of all these men who do nothing but sexually harass productive female workers.

Once Facebook leads by example and has a 100 percent female workforce, other companies will surely follow and do the same thing. Undoubtedly Facebook as a company will see increased performance because you will no longer have men sexually harassing women. These women instead of gossiping and causing unneeded drama will finally be able to focus in on real work!

What is this???? This is not OK! Inappropriate touching!!! Hello??? Facebook’s board of directors needs to investigate this obvious case of sexual harassment by their CEO Mark Zuckerberg! Look how uncomfortable and awkward Sheryl looks here! She obviously did not want to be touching Mr. lizard man!

It will be great to see a world in which all these big Jew run companies have a workforce that is 100 percent female. Technology and media companies should definitely take the lead on this. It seems as if these industries are the ones that have the most problems with sexual harassment. I believe this to be true especially after hearing the sad tales from Sheryl and seeing that awkward photo she was forced to take with the Zuck. The tech industry must have some really serious problems if even a strong empowered Jewish woman like Sheryl can be victimized.

Only once Jew run companies like Facebook fully embrace feminism and maintain an all female workforce can we ever hope to end sexual harassment in the workplace. Jews have been at the center of promoting feminism so surely they would not be afraid of going all in with a 100 percent female workforce. So what do you say Sheryl? The ball is in your court! It is time for you to lean in!

This crazy kike bitch Sheryl Sandberg is reason enough to delete your Facebook account!

Keeping track of all the insane things these kikes are doing is an extremely difficult task. The genetic nature of the Jew leads them to say some of the most hypocritical things imaginable. Take for example this story.

Facebook’s Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg is criticizing Twitter for engaging in censorship. Apparently she forgot to factor in the fact that Facebook engages in censorship policies as bad if not worse than Twitter.

Daily Caller:

Facebook’s chief operating officer said that Tennessee Rep. Marsha Blackburn’s campaign ad should not have been censored and barred from Twitter, because restricting speech for some people hurts everyone.

“When you cut off speech for one person, you cut off speech for all people,” Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg — who disagrees with Blackburn and is a long-time abortion advocate — said Thursday.

She is right that Twitter is censoring people, but why would you attack them for this when you are one of the top people at a company that does the exact same thing? It reveals that Jews are largely incapable of putting themselves in other people’s shoes. They can’t seem to comprehend how their behavior looks to outside observers.

Scientific studies show that you have an increased chance of contracting GRIDS by using Facebook!

The last thing you want to do is accuse other people of doing something bad when you yourself are guilty of doing that exact same thing. There’s literally thousands of articles detailing how Facebook stifles free speech and bans users under dubious circumstances. They’ve hired an army of people whose sole job is to police the thoughts of people who post on the site. A normal person would want to make sure their house is in order before casting stones at others. Sandberg is not a normal person though. She is a Jew.

Hypocrisy aside, it is good to see this type of thing happen. It shows that this Jewish system is really starting to implode. When you have one of the top kikes at Facebook attacking Twitter which adopts all sorts of kike policies themselves, it shows that the system is starting to cannibalize itself.

There’s no doubt that we are winning the culture war. Donald Trump’s presidency combined with the waning influence of the Jewish fake news media, nigger ball spectacles and kike run Hollywood proves that there are serious cracks in the foundation of this evil system. Nature is reasserting itself and we will prevail.

This is what happens when a billionaire Jewess has too much time on her hands.  They write stupid books crying about the lack of opportunities that women have and launch retarded campaigns to ban words like “bossy.”  I’m not kidding, this is what Sheryl Sandberg has done with her spare time.

Now she wants men to do more housework and claims that men will be able to have sex with their wife more because of it.  She’s even recruited the Black baller Lebron James to be part of this insane propaganda campaign.

Salon:

Sheryl Sandberg’s Lean In campaign is back in the news today, with a shiny new Web campaign called #LeanInTogether and a New York Times opinion piece explaining “How Men Can Succeed in the Boardroom and Bedroom.” The campaign is a feel-good sales pitch for men to support gender equality that sweetens the deal with promises of higher profits, better sex and the chance to be on the same team as LeBron James.

Sandberg (and her co-author, Adam Grant) argues that “equality is good for men, too,” by pointing to studies that show that women help businesses succeed: “Equality is not a zero-sum game. More profits mean more rewards and promotions to go around.” They also tout the benefits of equality in the (heterosexual, two-parent) home, where involved male partners will reap the rewards of happy children and happy wives if they perform their share of household labor. “Couples who share chores equally have more sex,” they promise. “Choreplay is real.”

Nice try Sheryl but we see what you are up too.  This is just a sneaky way to promote the lie of feminism which has utterly destroyed our society.  Does any man really think that they’ll get laid more if they do chores that your wife should be responsible for?  What a stupid campaign.

Sandberg is a subversive Jewess who should be deported to Israel.  In fact the insane Jew run corporation Facebook which she works for should be dissolved and its assets seized.  As far as I’m concerned, Facebook and all of this Jew promoted social media crap has been awful for society.

American Whites of European extraction — particularly White males — are being systematically displaced in the very country they built. This surely will not be news to TOO readers. As editor Kevin MacDonald has already pointed out, the appointment of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court is testimony to this trend:

Kagan’s arrival on the Supreme Court is a sort of official coming out party for the new elite. It’s been there for quite some time, but the Kagan nomination is an in-your-face-demonstration of the power of Jewish ethnic networking at the highest levels of government. And the first thing one notices is that the new elite has no compunctions about nominating someone for the Supreme Court even though she has no real qualifications. So much for the principles of merit and inclusion: Inclusion does not apply to WASPs now that they have been deposed. And the principle of merit can now be safely discarded in favor of ethnic networking. As I noted previously,

This is a favorite aspect of contemporary Jewish self-conception — the idea that Jews replaced WASPs because they are smarter and work harder. But this leads to the ultimate irony: Kagan isremarkably unqualified to be a Supreme Court Justice in terms of the usual standards: judicial experience, academic publications, or even courtroom experience. Rather, all the evidence is that Kagan owes her impending confirmation to her Jewish ethnic connections (see also here).

The same goes for Jewish over-representation in elite academic institutions — far higherthan can be explained by higher Jewish IQ. Does anyone seriously think that Jewish domination of Hollywood and so much of the other mainstream media  (see, e.g., Edmund Connelly’s article) is about merit rather than ethnic networking and solidarity?”

In conclusion, MacDonald writes, “Whatever else one can say about the new elite, it certainly does not believe in merit.” Allow me to offer a newer case in point — that of Facebook Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg, who grew up in a Jewish family in Miami. Sandberg’s key break was admission to Harvard, despite the fact that her academic background hardly seemed to warrant it. As she admits in her best-selling book Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead. (New York, Random House, 2013), she was clearly not prepared for the rarified atmosphere of Harvard:

Freshman year of college was a huge shock for me… [M]y professor of political philosophy assigned a five-page paper. I was panicked. Five whole pages! I had only written one paper that length in high school, and it was a year-long project. How could anyone write five pages in just one week? I stayed in every night, plugging away, and based on the time I put in, I should have gotten an A for effort. I got a C. It is virtually impossible to get a C at Harvard if the assignment is turned in. I am not exaggerating — this was the equivalent of a failing grade.”

How unprepared was she? Well, in a class called “The Concept of the Hero in Hellenistic Civilization,” she hadn’t even heard of the two main texts, The Iliad and The Odyssey. Meanwhile, most of her classmates had already read them, and about a third of them had read them in the original Homeric Greek. Yet there sat Miss Sandberg right beside them.

So why was such a student admitted to Harvard in the first place? The reason, it seems, is the fact that she had the right “personality,” i.e., the right ethnic personality, as a dorm proctor who worked in admissions confided to her. Michael Timmons, writing in E. Michael Jones’Culture Wars (July/Aug. 2014), argues that “her application would have been rejected if she were not a Jewish woman.” I suspect that is right, at least based on the information I had in 2009 when I wrote Harvard Hates Whites—Does America, Too? It turns out I had grossly underestimated the advantages given Jews in Ivy League admissions, as Jewish billionaire Ron Unz made crystal clear in his must-read The Myth of American Meritocracy: How corrupt are Ivy League Admissions. In twenty-eight tightly packed pages in The American Conservative (of which Unz was publisher from 2007–2013), Unz makes a stunning case that Jews are unfairly admitted to Ivy League schools at a shamefully high rate. And the big losers?  Whites of European stock. As Unz writes, We are therefore faced with the clear conundrum that Jewish students seem to constitute roughly 6 percent of America’s highest-ability high school graduates and non-Jewish whites around 65–70 percent, but these relative ratios differ by perhaps 1000 percent from the enrollments we actually find at Harvard and the other academic institutions which select America’s future elites. This article is perhaps the most important essay I’ve read in the last decade, so access the link above and save it before it vanishes down the memory hole. Included are four pages of explicit graphs, and the 120 tiny footnotes run four further pages. Sandberg’s break getting into Harvard was critical to all that came next — and make no mistake, she ascended the prevailing heights of our society. Her next break came when fellow ethnic Larry Summers offered to supervise her senior thesis on “the economics of spousal abuse.” Lo and behold, when Summers left to work for the World Bank, young Sandberg became his research assistant. Later, when he became Secretary of Treasury under Clinton, Sandberg was appointed Chief of Staff. Reviewer Timmons argues that “The truth is that she had been appointed to a powerful federal government position right out of college by her former professor who also shared her ethnic affiliation. In other words, her Ivy League connections and Jewish background had more to do with her position than her female gender.” (Summers was equally kind to Elena Kagan, appointing her dean of Harvard Law despite her shockingly mediocre accomplishments.) After leaving government, Sandberg opted for a move to Silicon Valley, where she continued to parlay ethnic networks into fabulous positions. First, she met fellow Jews Larry Page and Sergey Brinn, who had created the search engine Google. Unlike most job applicants, Sandberg, by her own admission, was hired “despite my complete lack of relevant experience.” What a lucky break. Timmons next notes Sandberg’s continued use of a tried and true formula: Six years later, Sandberg left Google after she was offered the Chief Operating Officer position at Facebook by another Jewish entrepreneur, Mark Zuckerberg.  Again, Sandberg enjoyed the benefits of her Ivy League diploma and the ethnic favoritism of her employers. Not a bad run so far.  Wiki estimates that Sandberg is currently worth over $1 billion, which, however, is small change compared to her former or current employers Page, Brinn and Zuckerberg, all in the high $20 billion range. Timmons goes on to note that Summers has helped yet another Jewish woman, Marne Levine, taking her from Harvard Business School to Washington with him and appointing her as Chief of Staff when he became Director of the National Economic Council. Jewish ethnic networking matters because it results in vast Jewish overrepresentation among American elites. This has huge implications because  the attitudes of Jewish elites are quite different from those of the traditional American majority — a phenomenon captured by the many articles in TOO under the category “Jews as a hostile elite.”

Take a look at this CBS video. I know what you’re all thinking – that I only linked up this video so I had an excuse to post a picture of Emma Rosenblum’s lovely Jewish nose. But no, that’s not the real story!

The real reason for this post is to illustrate, once again, how whenever you find the feminist agenda being promoted to detach women from any idea of motherhood, you always find Jews behind it. There are hardly ever any exceptions.

Here’s what Emma Rosenblum in “Bloomberg Business Week” (how much more ‘Jewy’ do things have to get – Rosenblum in Bloomberg, for cryin out loud) has to say:

There comes a point in every childless woman’s life, usually around 35, when the larger world becomes very interested in her womb. Friends and family inquire about its health, asking why it’s not being utilized, when it will be, and then: Will it even work? For those who do want children, the pressure can be crushing and counterproductive. “I found myself going on dates thinking, is this marriage material? Is this? Is he? It was exhausting,” says Dr. Suzanne LaJoie, an ob-gyn in Manhattan. “When I was in med school and residency, all my friends were having babies.” She went through a breakup in her mid-30s and started to worry she wouldn’t be able to have a child of her own. So in 2007, at age 37, she paid $10,000 for a round of oocyte cryopreservation, more commonly known as egg freezing. “I just wanted to take the pressure off,” LaJoie says. “Men don’t have a biological clock, and I felt like it leveled the playing field a bit.”

LaJoie fits the typical profile of an egg freezer: They’re great at their jobs, they make a ton of money, and they’ve followed all of Sheryl Sandberg’s advice. But the husband and baby haven’t materialized, and they can recite the stats about their rapidly decreasing fertility as a depressing party trick. For LaJoie, now 45, it was demoralizing to see friend after friend get married and have kids, while she was stuck at the hospital without romantic prospects.

“You feel bad about yourself, like you’re the odd man out, and somehow you’ve messed up on your path,” says Sarah Elizabeth Richards, who spent $50,000 freezing several rounds of eggs in 2006 to 2008 and wrote a book about the experience, Motherhood, Rescheduled: The New Frontier of Egg Freezing and the Women Who Tried It. “By freezing, you’ve done something about it. You’re walking taller; your head is held higher. And that can pay off in both your work and romantic lives.” Richards, now 43, is dating someone promising and says she’d like to thaw her eggs in the next year or so. She’s also at work on a new book and plans on finishing it before she tries to get pregnant. “Egg freezing gives you the gift of time to start a family, but it’s also, like, here’s how many years I actually have left for my other goals—what can I do with them?”

And how about the Jewess Sheryl Sandberg?

She’s one of Jew-boy Mark Zuckerberg’s associates at their international data collection agency, otherwise known as Facebook.  I’m sure she has some great advice for young goyim women.

Here’s some of Sheryl’s advice:

In 2003 two professors at Columbia Business School and New York University gave their students a case study to test attitudes about gender in the workplace. Half the students got the real-life story of Heidi Roizen, who became a successful venture capitalist by using “her outgoing personality and … vast personal and professional network.” The other half received exactly the same study, but with one vital difference: The name Heidi was changed to Howard.

Both groups of students decided that Heidi and Howard were equally competent, but it turned out they liked Howard a whole lot better. Even though Heidi and Howard were the same person acting in the same way and getting the same results, Heidi was perceived as selfish and “not the type of person you would want to hire or work for.”

Poor Heidi. Smart, superdiligent, and go-getting, the gal’s got just one problem she can’t overcome: She has ovaries. If a man is successful, both genders tend to like him. High-achieving women, not so much.

What is it about females and power? To be specific, why are our highflying girls still falling like Icarus when they get too close to the sun? This is the fiendish dilemma that Sheryl Sandberg, the chief operating officer of Facebook (FB), addresses in her book, Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead. A forthright, if often confused, meditation on sexism, the book has attracted more than its share of prepublication hostility from people resentful that a Silicon Valley überfemale worth $500 million would dare to address the problems of Everywoman. I don’t think anyone actually used the words “back to your palace, bitch,” but that’s been the tenor of the criticism, which has often come from women who had not done Sandberg the elementary courtesy of reading the book they claimed to hate.

That’s a pity because, frankly, women are desperately lacking savvy guides to the higher echelons of corporate life. Most of us have more of an idea about social grooming habits among primates than what goes on in the boardroom of a multibillion-dollar company, although some would claim those two male-bonding sessions are not so very different. Sandberg isn’t the first writer to observe that brainy girls believe that, if they work insanely hard, virtue will have its own reward and promotion is guaranteed. (It won’t, and it isn’t.) What’s new is her insistence that women are up against gender stereotypes so powerfully ingrained that we should work with and not against them.

Here’s the catch: To be successful, a woman has to act like a man; but if she acts like a man instead of a nurturing people-pleaser, she’ll be disliked and won’t succeed. “We sense this punishment for success,” says Sandberg, who believes it causes women to “put ourselves down before others can.”

Can everyone see the problem here? It simply is not natural for women to act like men! Why any woman would want a so-called “career” slaving away, even in “CEO” type positions, for some stupid company (probably Jew-run) , when they could raise a healthy 4 or 5 child family is beyond me!

Nurturing and raising healthy children is what women were created for. Isn’t that what any normal man wants his female counterpart to care about most? I certainly don’t want some stroppy, pissed-off, suit-wearing, pain-in-the-arse for a future wife!

Jewish Feminism is pushed for one main reason: to destroy the healthy functioning family unit.

Women are not liberated by detaching themselves from motherhood, and men are not relevant or needed in the lives of these suit-wearing “careerist” women.

Men need to be needed as bread-winners and protectors of their family. That’s the man’s job, not the woman’s.

If women can now live independently of men, then what the hell do us men do? Sit around and find pointless, childish ways of amusing ourselves? We’re pretty much there regarding the mentality of modern ‘men,’ sadly. I’ve got a mental image of an adult man playing endless computer games, and when he’s not doing that, he’s a professional sports fan who spends every other spare moment glued to the T.V. watching all the games like a child.

Men’s problems aside, if things just continue down this feminist path, then those men with healthy instincts will struggle to find any decent women to raise a family with!