Wow, I can’t believe it took this long to get around to canceling Hugh Hefner.

I guess the fact that he was already dead when metoo started put him low on the list.

Just to be clear: Hefner was a literal pimp, who did not disguise this fact. The Jews who run the media decided that making a pimp a celebrity was good for the goyim.

Now, the Jews are saying “oh my God, I can’t believe this guy was a pimp.”

RT:

Playboy founder Hugh Hefner may have passed on in 2017 at the age of 91, but there are still plenty of people with much to say about the man, evidenced in a new documentary in which he is accused of everything from sexual assault to bestiality.

The 10-part A&E documentary series titled ‘Secrets of Playboy’, which premieres on Monday night, features many figures from Hefner’s life, including former Playmate models, as well as ex-girlfriend Sondra Theodore, who described the infamous cigar-smoking, pajama-wearing media mogul as a “predator” who groomed young women.

Theodore herself said she began dating Hefner when he was 50 and she was 19. She said he plied her with alcohol when she was under the legal age and later introduced her to drugs.

These women went to Hefner because they were hookers. That’s why a woman goes to a brothel – she is applying for a job as a hooker.

Once again, we have women who are victims of their own decisions. It’s really incredible that women are empowered and can do everything a man can do (but better), but also, they don’t have human agency and men are responsible for all of their decisions that they decide decades later were bad decisions.

Perhaps the most shocking claim is Hefner’s supposed preference later in life for the company of animals.

“I walked in on him with my dog and I said, ‘What are you doing?’ I was shocked,” Theodore told the New York Post, claiming she caught Hefner performing a sexual act with the animal. “He made it seem like it was just a one-time thing, and that he was just goofing off. But I never left him alone with my dog again.”

Another woman claimed that adult film actress Linda Lovelace was coaxed with drugs by Hefner and other men to perform a sexual act on a dog at a party. That incident was recalled by former Playboy employee PJ Masten, who was for many years in charge of the Playmate models.

“She was drunk and drugged…They got her so messed up that they made her give the German Shepherd oral sex. You wanna talk about depravity? This is despicable,” Masten said.

Hefner also apparently had a penchant for snuff films and he was accused of filming sexual acts without consent, drugging woman and coercing them into sexual encounters.

Yeah, okay – that is obviously made up. But hey – he’s way too dead to sue.

Whatever.

This is just lurid smut for the goyim. Smut about a smut peddler.

I think Hefner, by normalizing the sexual revolution, was one of the most damaging figures in American history.

But that isn’t what is is about. Hefner is still a hero for destroying traditional sexual norms. This is just some bizarre circus sideshow thing about sex with dogs (which is also probably serving to normalize that).

Did you know that even Ruth Bader Ginsburg said that Roe v. Wade was not a strong ruling?

The Guardian:

The Biden administration has formally asked a federal judge to block enforcement of a new Texas law that effectively bans almost all abortions in the state under a novel legal design that opponents say is intended to thwart court challenge.

The US Department of Justice’s 45-page emergency motion seeks a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction lifting the abortion ban while its lawsuit challenging the statute as unconstitutional proceeds through the courts.

“This relief is necessary to protect the constitutional rights of women in Texas and the sovereign interest of the United States,” the DoJ’s brief stated.

The Republican-backed law forbids abortions performed once cardiac activity has been detected in the embryo, which typically starts at six weeks of gestation, before many women even realise they are pregnant.

It’s an interesting fight, I guess.

You know how we here at Hoax Watch feel about abortion.

But clearly, the right is losing everywhere, all the time. The claim that they might just magically win on the abortion fight is silly. Of course they will not win.

After British porn artist Belle Delphine released previews of a violent rape porno she’d filmed for her OnlyFans account, there was a lot of backlash on the internet from various social justice advocates who claimed that she was “glorifying rape.”

It obviously was “glorifying rape” (whatever you might take that to mean, the statement taken straightforwardly is self-evidently true). Delphine labeled the preview for the porno “my perfect first date.”

The “problematic” nature of this porno was compounded, the social fighters said, by the fact that she was dolled up to look like a 12-year-old (despite the fact that the keen observer could notice some veins on her legs that a 12-year-old would not have).

belle delphine dressing as a child pretending to get kidnapped & r//ped and ppl simp over her … u need a psychological evaluation

— ~ ☾ mon~☆♡ (@monnoxide_) January 12, 2021

The first thing to grasp is that none of these critics are critics of pornography in general, they were simply criticizing the idea of a porno that featured a girl, pretending to be very young, being violently forced into sex by an older man.

I would like to just make it clear: the people claiming that Delphine is more mentally unsound than the average Western woman, or that the men masturbating to this are more mentally unsound than the average masturbators, is false.

Both modern men and women are sexually deranged, but it is not because they view sex as an act of dominance by a man over a woman. Sex is an act of a male dominating a female. It is the basic order of nature.

Please watch any mammal mating video on YouTube.

We have natural sexual drives. The sexual drive of the female is to make herself available to the male, to signal her willingness and fertility to the male, and to convince the male to grab her and inseminate her. That is the fundamental biological reality that we are dealing with as mammals. This doesn’t go away because you drive a car, live in a high-rise and play on a smartphone.

Obviously, within a civilization, you cannot tolerate this kind of behavior. Not even in primitive tribes did they tolerate this kind of behavior, outside of places like West Africa and among the Aboriginals of Australia. Probably the biggest part of the development of civilization itself involves the creation of taboos around sex. What the Jews did, in their “critique” of civilization, was argue for the removal of thousands of years of sexual taboos, so you are now witnessing the animal nature of man laid bare.

This animal nature of man is embodied in the Belle Delphine rape images, and that is why they are bothering people. But none of the bothered people understand why they are bothered, because according to every ideological norm of our society, there should be nothing wrong with a woman dressing up like a little girl and staging a rape fantasy.

The ability to destroy our sexual taboos without civilization collapsing immediately and just outright leading to a Mad Max type scenario was made possible by several modern inventions:

• Condoms
• Birth control pills
• Safe abortion

(Note that in the 1920s, the Jews tried this “sexual revolution” business on a limited scale among the lower middle class in Western urban areas, and it just turned into a total disaster of fatherless children being raised in group homes, and people were like “we can’t tolerate this situation, this is going to lead to total social collapse.”)

The process of destroying these ancient taboos took time, of course. Even when I was in school, there was still at least a vague idea that a teenage couple that was involved sexually should be looking forward to marriage. That idea is now gone, and the female reigns supreme. She is able to choose whatever sexual partner she wishes, whenever she wishes. And, as in the gorilla video above, this typically involves teasing lesser males, to create interest by the targeted alpha male, who will then rush the bitch and have his way with her.

In the 2010s, this involved a woman in a social circle targeting lesser value males, flirting with them in front of the higher value male, so that the higher value male would take interest in her and approach her. Again: just basically exactly what happened in that gorilla video above.

In the current year, women have streamlined this process even further using technology. What women do is create followings online, posting pictures of themselves naked or in various states of undress. This causes the lesser males to gather around and send them money, while the women attempt to garner attention from the higher value males. Basically, women create these Instagram and OnlyFans profiles, making a lot of money in the process, while advertising themselves to high value males. Once they get big followings, rappers or Arabian princes (and maybe occasionally a white guy, but it is difficult for a white man to maintain any social value at all in modern society – separate issue) will slide into their DMs, and give them the opportunity to come get fucked by the big boss alpha.

You’ve created a paradise for women, and a kind of hell for men, where the woman is able to strive (without much special effort) to get sex from the top level males, while the average male (and increasingly, the above average male) is left masturbating on the internet.

This is all the epitome of barbarism, as being a core animal drive, sexuality is naturally barbaric (which is why putting restraints on it was at the core of the concept of civilization).

Obviously, within this barbaric female sexual fantasy world, you are going to witness sexual atavism. Obviously, the Belle Delphine rape porno is pure sexual atavism.

The reason that people are getting upset about it is that none of the true believers in sexual utopianism want to come face-to-face with the real implications of the sexual revolution that was forced on us. They don’t want to look at Belle Delphine’s rape fantasy, because they want to believe in the sexual revolution as was advertised. They don’t want to believe that we’ve devolved to the level of animals, through the breaking of these taboos.

How was the sexual revolution advertised?

In order to understand the sexual revolution, we need to look at the Jews. I say “Jews” here in the strictest sense – excluding Alfred Kinsey, who was just a standard perverted lunatic who was groomed and promoted as a genius by Jews, everyone involved in formulating the sexual revolution plot was ethnically Jewish with a strong Jewish identity, and framed their sexual revolution as an attack on Christianity and “fascism.” In the writings of the Frankfurt School, these Jews stated that their explicit purpose in deconstructing sexual taboos was to collapse the family, as they viewed strong patriarchal families as the root of “the Hitler problem.”)

If you want to know more about all of that, you can read Frankfurt fellow Herbert Marcuse’s “Eros and Civilization.” You can also try to read Frankfurt fellow Theodor Adorno’s “The Authoritarian Personality,” though I have frankly found the book almost impenetrable (there are various summaries available). The concept you will find throughout is that there is a strong Jewish identity, and that their drive to break down sexual norms was very closely related to their Judaism. Much of this is covered in Kevin MacDonald’s book “Culture of Critique,” which contains most of the money quotes regarding the Jewish nature of this weird sexual agenda.

Another German Jew you will want to examine is Wilhelm Reich, who believed that masturbation created a magical energy. Like the members of the Frankfurt School, he viewed “fascism” as a phenomenon caused by the sexual repression of the goyim, expounding on this view in a book called “The Mass Psychology of Fascism.” He spent his life mourning the fact that Joseph Stalin put the kibosh on early Bolshevik attempts at sexual revolution. In his book “The Sexual Revolution,” he attributed every problem that the Soviet Union faced to Stalin’s refusal to embrace free love. Reich attempted to use this masturbation energy to cure disease. He would have people sit naked in a box while he masturbated. He then tried to use masturbation energy to cure childhood disease, and many of the children reported – shockingly – to have been sexually abused while in the program. Later in his life, he claimed that he could masturbate into a tube and use it to change the weather (which, to be fair, is not really any less kooky than modern climate change science). Despite all of this weird stuff – all of which you can read about on Reich’s Wikipedia page – he was at the time considered a serious scientist, and worked with another allegedly serious scientist named Albert Einstein. To this day, Reich’s work is cited favorably by academics working in the social sciences.

There are several other Jews you can look into, but the three I mention here were overwhelmingly influential in academia, and laid the groundwork for what would be known as “the sexual revolution.”

So, how did these Jews sell a plan, which they stated rather plainly had the purpose of destroying Christian society, to a Christian society? Well, through mass media and pop culture, of course.

Related: Ariana Grande Makes New “Porno Pop” Cunnilingus Song for the Children

As we’ve recorded here at the Daily Stormer in much detail, the feminist movement, which stemmed directly from the work of these academic Jews, was also totally Jewish. You would be hard-pressed even today to find an established figure in the feminist movement who is not Jewish. The first feminist theorists, such as the Jew Betty Friedan, argued that women were not happy with being married and having children, and would be happier working at banks. Then you had the Jew Gloria Steinem out there marching through the streets.

These Jewish women were of course darlings of the Jewish media, and it breaks both my heart and my brain that men at the time were incapable of realizing what was happening so obviously in front of their faces. It just really feels like someone other than George Lincoln Rockwell should have been able to stand up and say, “hey, wait just a minute here – what the hell are you Jews up to?”

Despite the words that were used in the revolutionary slogans, the non-Jewish women who followed the movement understood that they were being offered the opportunity to use their sexuality to dominate men, and this idea appealed to them for obvious reasons.

Then you had the revolutions of the 1960s, fueled by drugs that were distributed and promoted largely by Jews and intelligence agencies that even at that time were largely influenced by Jews and communists. That was the big advertising push: this idea that you could just have sex with a bunch of different people, and it would be really fun, and you could be like Peter Pan and remain a child forever, just having sex and dancing around.

Then, the drug-fueled public orgies of the 1960s got out of control, and there was a correction, following this thesis-antithesis-consensus model. “Free sex” continued, but it became a situation where all the power was in the hands of women to choose who they had sex with, and they could very easily pretend that they were not having sex with whoever they were having sex with, what with the birth control pills and the abortions.

Sex with multiple partners damages the ability of women to form emotional bonds with men, and thus after the 1980s and 90s “correction” of the sexual revolution, you ended up with mass divorce, with women purposefully destroying their families in order to go off and have a fun time with some new man. This process was totally endorsed by the government, which, along the same timeline was being progressively “democratized,” i.e., infused with the Jewish social doctrine of Marxism, which had also fueled the sexual revolutions.

What you ended up with is the situation you have now, which is effectively total dominance by women, who use both sex and their superior position within the legal system to rule over men. Women might get married, they might get divorced, they might just spend their whole lives having sex with men. There are no rules. There is no system of taboos, let alone laws, that protect the family.

Donald Trump and the Backlash to the Sexual Revolution

We are now entering the third generation of Westerners who grew up without any clear notion at all of the family as a definite, solid structure. It would not be Freudian in the least to suggest that the current support you are seeing for Donald Trump, and the rage you are seeing at Donald Trump being taken from us, is an expression of sexual frustration. It is ultimately the collapse of the family that has caused all of the chaos in our society. Strong families build strong societies, and societies without families aren’t really even societies at all, any more than a pile of rocks is a cathedral.

Donald Trump is a man who you can follow as if he is your father. Despite all of his flaws, he always put out an energy that implied he knew what was going on, he was in charge, and he would take care of things. What we are seeing with the current outrage and breakdown is the shock at the fact that Donald Trump is not actually in charge. Seeing him stripped of his power is like seeing your father, who you from infancy believed was a god, breaking down and crying.

In human societies, “order” starts with “family.” That is what separates us from the chaos of the jungle apes. What everyone wants, whether they know it or not, is a return to the safety and the normalcy of the family structure, where your home was your safe home, where dad was in charge. In order for that to exist, there have to be limits on mom’s sexual drives. There have to be structures.

Just as the instinct of the Jews to destroy the family was an instinct to destroy authoritarianism, the drive to reestablish authoritarianism is a drive to reestablish the family. Because the family is safety. And it is what makes us human.

Previously, some form of authoritarianism is taken as a given. We can talk all we want about the French Revolution, but ultimately, the French Revolution ended with Napoleon being crowned Emperor of the French. There is always this drive to return to order, and order is authoritarian. The single most accurate definition of the Jew is: “a humanoid creature which is biologically driven to undermine natural systems of order.”

Every previous revolution backed by the peasants was about material resources. People thought they didn’t have enough land, food, horses, or whatever, or that they didn’t have enough autonomy over the resources that they did have. The current revolution, which we are all pushing for, is about something much more fundamental: democracy, and the liberation that it entails, have taken away our core humanity, by collapsing our most fundamental organizational structures.

The images of Belle Delphine, painted up like a 12-year-old, being tied up and raped by a man in a mask, and the unsettling emotions that is creating in some people, should be a point at which some of these people begin to ask: “what horrible thing have we done?”

If you haven’t seen the now-infamous Tucker Manifesto Monologue, watch it now.

There has been a lot of response to this, because it was so incredibly moving. The Jews struggled to respond, doing things like claiming that people actually want teenagers to be high on marijuana all the time.

The best take was from David French of the National Review (never thought I’d write that sentence, ever in my life):

Carlson is advancing a form of victim-politics populism that takes a series of tectonic cultural changes—civil rights, women’s rights, a technological revolution as significant as the industrial revolution, the mass-scale loss of religious faith, the sexual revolution, etc.—and turns the negative or challenging aspects of those changes into an angry tale of what they are doing to you.

The essay is otherwise just as horrible as you would imagine it would be, but that one sentence is pure gold.

The basic argument of David French (and really everyone else who isn’t Tucker Carlson or a literal Nazi) is that all of these things are just happening at random and that there is no one to blame for them.

And in many ways, this is the defining question of our time: is all of this just a result of social labor pains as we give birth to a glorious new global technological order or is someone doing it on purpose?

Because if it is happening at random, then there isn’t really anything to be done. You just have to find a way to cope, push through life with as little pain as possible, hope that your children – or, more specifically, someone else’s children – will someday experience a glorious post-racial global technological utopia.

If, on the other hand, someone is doing all of this on purpose, then the logical course of action is to call them out and force them to stop by whatever means necessary.

If you actually are a victim, then your politics absolutely should be “victim-politics.” More accurately, they should be “retribution-politics.”

As the reader is most likely aware, there is definitely a someone, and that someone is most easily defined as “the Jews.”

Obviously, there would have been challenges surrounding the way technology is changing society, but we could have dealt with them in a reasonable way if we were not being hindered by Jews.

Regarding the other issues French lists – these are problems entirely created by the Jews.

Civil Rights

The entire concept of “civil rights” was created by Jews. You can just read the Wikipedia page on the civil rights movement, and find that it is all Jews responsible.

The NAACP was founded mainly by Jews, not black people. The Jews brag about this.

Martin Luther King, Jr.’s speeches were written by a communist Jew. He was surrounded by Jews. The Jews brag about this.

The Jews brag about how 90% of civil rights lawyers in Mississippi were Jewish.

Here’s another instance of the Jews bragging about how they ran the entire movement.

The ACLU is a Jewish ethnic activist group, as is virtually every other civil right group.

It’s not an issue for debate.

Women’s Rights

The women’s rights movement was even more absurdly Jewish than the general civil rights movement, as they didn’t need black figureheads.

Virtually every single feminist leader in America from the 1950s until the present has been Jewish.

Betty Friedan was who really kicked it off, then followed Gloria Steinem.

No one would have thought of women’s liberation if it were not for the Jews. The issue never even would have come up.

Loss of Religious Faith

The death of Christianity has been due both to Jews attacking it through their media and lawfare, and due to Jews infiltrating and taking over the Christian movement and hollowing it out, removing any value from it, destroying its appeal.

Virtually the entire atheist movement (with the notable exception of Richard Dawkins) is Jewish.

The entire concept of a dichotomy between “science and faith” was created by Jews.

The Jew Sigmund Freud pathologized Christianity, and the Jewish Frankfurt School created an entire system designed to destroy Christian society through wide-scale social-engineering.

Furthermore, the promotion of sexual liberation and other degenerate “lifestyle choice” by the Jews has led to a decline of religiosity.

The Jews specifically hate Christianity and in their own holy book have a story about Jesus Christ being in hell boiling in a vat of feces.

The Sexual Revolution

As mentioned, the feminist angle of the sexual revolution was entirely Jewish. Jews are the main figures running the abortion industry and the legal arm of the abortion movement.

Jews are the main creators of pornography. The Jewish Quarterly had an article outlining the details of the Jewish role in the creation of pornography up on their website since 2004, but removed it just a few months ago because too many “anti-Semites” were linking to it. Here is an archived copy (which you should spread around).

When the Jewish pornographer Al Goldstein was asked why there are so many Jews in pornography, he said: “The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don’t believe in authoritarianism.”

The homosexual rights movement was dominated by Jews, and every pedophilia activism group has been run by Jews. Allen Ginsberg, the Jewish poet, was a founding member of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA).

And of course, the main driver of the sexual revolution, Hollywood entertainment media, is totally and completely controlled by Jews. Yet another thing they openly brag about.

Conclusion

One can only conclude that if it were not for the Jews, these negative things would not be happening, because it is a demonstrable fact that the Jews pushed for them to happen against the tide of culture and the general will of the people.

Tucker doesn’t say “Jews,” but he knows it is the Jews. No one with any desire to know the truth of what is happening in the world doesn’t know about the Jews. The only people who do not know about the Jews are either dumb, uninterested or willfully lying to themselves on purpose.

Tucker talks about “elite” and so on. Euphemisms. Because of course he can’t come right out and say “it’s the Jews” and remain at his level of influence.

As I said with the PewDiePie thing – me saying this isn’t going to hurt Tucker. What it actually does when the Jews come out and say “Nazis like Tucker” is make people wonder why that is. Because people like Tucker, and can see his fundamentally good and honest nature, defaming him with goofy nonsense like “he’s evil because evil people like him” is not going to work. It leads instead to people looking into the issue and finding out that yes, when he talks about “the elite,” he is talking about “the Jews.”

Because that is a point of fact. 

The information is there and the debate is over, which is why there is no public debate and anyone who brings up the issue is simply silenced. You cannot actually make an argument that Jews are not responsible for the destruction of society – the only thing you could attempt to say is that all of these Jews were just individual humans and it is a coincidence that they’re all Jewish – but that already very fragile “pure coincidence” argument falls apart when you look at the way Jews brag about how all of these agendas are an expression of Judaism and Jewish values.

In the long run, we cannot solve the problem by using euphemisms.

I support Tucker using euphemisms now, obviously.

But at some point, we are going to have to name the enemy of the people – and society as a whole is going to have to deal with them.

We don’t have any choice.

The “Good Men Project,” a Wall Street financed blog (financed in big part by Jew board member Ken Goldstein) that teaches men how to never get laid again, has just released a guide on “fragile masculinity.”

The attack on male identity is based on worn-out Freudian canards. Freud is famous for deconstructing the sexes down to mere differences in genitalia, e.g., “anatomy is destiny.”

From this foundation, all types of nature-haters have built intellectual houses of cards on it. The trite baloney would collapse if ever hit with even the slightest draft, which is why they must use their greater funding and Jew-provided platforms to invent tricks that dissuade people from questioning these assertions in “polite society.”

The Good Men Project suggests that reacting when Western manhood comes under political and cultural attack is somehow pathological. Imagine if doctors started interpreting a functional Patellar reflex as a sign of illness!

Good Men Project:

There’s a sweatshirt that I’ve fallen in love with that says, “I’m too clumsy to be around fragile masculinity”.

It’s funny to me because (a) I’m clumsy, known to fall both up and downstairs at the drop of a hat, and (b) fragile masculinity is this thing that I confront on a regular basis as a writer, outspoken feminist, and participant in the #MeToo movement. Clearly, this is a sweatshirt that should be hanging in my wardrobe.

But fragile masculinity itself is far from funny. In fact, it’s part of the toxic masculinity that perpetuates rape culture and misogyny. But it’s a very real thing, and if you’ve been accused of having it, consider this an opportunity to address it.

Identifying Symptoms

So what are the symptoms of fragile masculinity? They are quite easy to identify. When confronted with an issue related to gender or social progress, fragile masculinity tends to manifest in one or more of the following ways:

• The declaration of “not all men”

• The assertion of “men, too”

• A feeling of offense on behalf of oneself or all men

• Coming to the aid of unknown men without all the facts

• An attempt to play devil’s advocate or present other sides to the story

• Accusing others of being sexist against men

• A discomfort with being seen as feminine in any way (example: avoiding pink shirts or activities that could be considered as more feminine than masculine)

• A discomfort with being identified as a member of the LGBTQ+ community (example: loudly declaring what you’d do if a gay man hit on you, vociferously declaring your passion about women for all to hear, etc)

• Clarifying that you aren’t (a) feminine or (b) gay when no one asked

It’s important to perform a differential diagnosis to determine if one’s masculinity is fragile or if something else is presenting. If you have manifested one of the aforementioned symptoms, it’s likely that you have a case of fragile masculinity. However, sometimes this may be a temporary case related to a specific personal experience.

For example, you may have said “men, too” in an effort to speak up about your own experiences of sexual harassment or assault as a part of the #MeToo movement. You likely did not mean to take anything away from the movement, and you may recognize that harassment and assault are more prevalent among women than men. However, you wanted to be able to draw attention to the fact that #mentoo experience assault. Perhaps you were just trying to relate, empathize, and even support the movement, and had good intentions. If so, you may not have a case of fragile masculinity.

So turning down a homosexual’s advances or finding a woman sexually attractive means you are insecure about your masculinity.

Which goes back to the original problem with the sexual revolution: marginals replace normals as arbitrators of social norms. This bitch wouldn’t call fags eating each other’s feces on public transportation and getting giardia thrice in as many months out-of-bounds.

But in this mangled mess of a troll, there may be a subtlety I agree with. Crystal Jackson, the mauve-haired feminist pig author, fixates on defensive arguments for masculinity as proof of it being flimsy. Millennial women often reveal subconscious complaints about lack of hard masculinity by writing things that test the limits of nu-males and soyim. How much of your dignity are you ready to sacrifice?

She is right in calling it fragility in that sense, but for the wrong reasons. Men are born to be on the offensive, e.g., solar man vs. lunar woman. Man, of course, is a penetrative force in every sense of the word. When you find yourself on guard, you are losing.

When you find yourself splitting hairs about how “first wave feminism” is good and “third wave” is bad (they’re all just different stages of bad) like Sargin, then you have succumbed.

At that point, you might as well replace your copy of Marcus Aurelius’ Meditations with this Gender Studies 101 kike crap.

A very good looking couple is in the news. Instead of settling down and contributing beautiful children to the world, the female half woke up one day and decided she’d rather be a coke whore.

This is a story most Millennial men are sadly familiar with.

We want love, children and families, yet today’s women don’t want it until they’ve racked up enough notches to fit around their expanding gut.

But what happened next I cannot condone [Editor’s Note: I can. -AA].

The betrayed man stalked the woman then stabbed her to death. There’s thot patrolling, but this is brutality.

This is now the number one news story in Britain, obviously because the culprit is white. Places like London and Manchester are infested with violent immigrant crime (including rape and murder), but that’s not politically correct to talk about.

I haven’t looked through all of it, but I’m sure there’s lots of long op-eds about the problem of “white toxic masculinity” and how women who feel no respect, love or accountability towards men they choose to get into relationships with are the real victim.

The Sun:

A STUDENT was stabbed to death by her ex seven minutes after messaging pals: “Feel like I’m looking over my shoulder all the time,” a jury heard yesterday.

Molly McLaren, 23, sent the WhatsApp text after Joshua Stimpson tracked her down at her gym, the court was told.

Stimpson, who had two knives and a pickaxe in his bag, put his exercise mat near hers in the empty studio on June 29 last year, jurors heard.

A jury has been shown a blood-soaked Asda knife which it is claimed Molly was stabbed to death with by “manipulative and nasty” Stimpson.

The 23-year-old was sitting in her Citroen car at the busy Chatham Dockside Outlet in Kent when Stimpson repeatedly knifed her in the neck and head just after 11am on June 29 last year, the court heard.

Police allege that a witness to the attack, Benjamin Morton, tried to pull the 26-year-old off Molly as she screamed.

…

Asked about whether he had been experiencing any difficulties with his thoughts, he allegedly said: “I must have or I wouldn’t have done this.”

At the start of the trial at Maidstone Crown Court in Kent today, prosecutor Philip Bennetts QC told the jury of seven men and five women: “The defendant has pleaded guilty to manslaughter on the basis that at the time of the killing he was suffering from diminished responsibility.

“The prosecution do not accept that he was. Psychiatrists will be called by the defence and prosecution to assist you in determining whether he was or was not suffering from diminished responsibility.

“A psychiatrist for the prosecution is clearly of the opinion that this defendant was not.”

The court heard Molly and Stimpson started dating in November 2016 after meeting through Tinder but briefly split four months later.

Stimpson was described as ‘rather demanding’ with Molly often trying to ‘put things right’. He himself said he had ‘intense emotions’.

…

She finally ended the relationship for good on June 17, just 12 days before she died.

In the intervening days the window firm warehouse worker began posting derogatory comments and photos about the part-time barmaid on Facebook, it is alleged.

These included lies about her using cocaine and he tagged people so that all her family could see.

Molly reported the posts to police on June 22. Stimpson, of High Street Wouldham, near Rochester, Kent, was spoken to but it allegedly continued.

The previous day Molly had told a relative she feared he would hurt her.

Describing him as “manipulative and turning nasty”, she allegedly told the relative: “I am actually scared about what he might do.

“I’m scared he might hurt me. I don’t know how on edge he is.”

Mr Bennetts said Stimpson “may or may not” have also been stalking Molly after their break-up, but he did begin to follow her.

I know a coke slut when I see one, and this guy wasn’t lying.

Here’s what really happened: she started ghosting and flaking this dude to bang drug dealers in night club bathrooms, he’s emotionally unhinged, so he started stalking her until he saw something that made him flip out.

You have to be emotionally and mentally tough to navigate this modern world. No men in all of human history have had to live through something like this.

It’s a myth that this is unique to ugly, loser or even weak men. Most men can at least process their surroundings, become jaded and callous, then enjoy the entertainment value of being man-whores while it lasts.

But certain more sensitive types simply lose their minds. Usually it manifests in alcohol abuse and sterile disposable sexual relationships, but in extreme cases it can result in violence. Millennial women are monsters, but lashing out like this only makes the problem worse.

The court would be sympathetic if he was a Pakistani, but because of his race, they will not even entertain the thought of him losing his mind in a fit of passion. The Queen is going to give him whatever the British equivalent of the chair is for this egregious overreaction to hypergamy and feminism.

You’re supposed to sit there and take it like a good cuck, because it’s specifically engineered by Jews to cause a below replacement white birth rate.

On the bright side for Mr. Stimpson, he will now get thousands of fawning marriage proposals from female admirers as a handsome and famous murderer.

This is how the world works when women are given all the power. The only thing reliable about this dynamic is that it helps destroy society.

Welcome to the United Clowndom!

If you don’t control the women in your life, a 75 IQ 18-year-old Afghan barbarian will do it for you!

Swedish men (and all Western men) need to get angrier.

Women who aren’t controlled by good men who care about them get into all kinds of stupid and dangerous hijinks. Innocent people, especially the children they always get in divorce court, always end up getting hurt. That’s what the system wants.

The women who make these anti-social sexual choices that put their children in danger are never held accountable. They have all the privileges of adults but treated like children themselves when somebody needs to pay the consequences. That needs to change.

Traditionally women at least defy Jewish engineering enough to love their own children, but even this is starting to change in the younger generations.

Women have become numb zombies thanks to anti-depressants, frequent casual sex, and social media addiction.

In this case, we have a woman in her 40s actually dating a teenager from Afghanistan, who then proceeds to sexually violate her 12-year-old daughter.

The theory that child migrant homes are really just places where over-the-hill feminists go to get laid appears to be backed up in this case as well. This sexual relationship with a minor has almost certainly been going on for a long time.

What’s even more shocking about this case: she knew this invader was raping her daughter and kept it hidden from the police!

Daily Mail:

An Afghan migrant who molested a 12-year-old Swedish girl was initially not reported to police – because her mother was dating him.

Abdul Dostmohammadi, 18, was living with his 45-year-old girlfriend in Sölvesborg, southern Sweden, when he sexually molested the 12-year-old.

When the girl told her what had happened, the mother refused to report him to police as she feared he would be sent back to Afghanistan, court documents reveal.

Dostmohammadi, now 19, had moved into the family home after he turned 18 and was no longer allowed to live in a care home for under-aged migrants.

The 45-year-old had worked at the care home, and had offered to take Dostmohammadi in after he became an adult.

The perpetrator moved into the home in November 2016 and the pair embarked on a relationship just over a month later.

According to the 12-year-old, who splits her time between her mother and father’s homes, Dostmohammadi ‘liked hugs, but the hugs led to kisses on her cheeks which she thought were getting a bit too close to her mouth.’

She told police she could not remember what day in the autumn of 2017, Dostmohammadi molested her, but that it was on the same day they had buried her dog.

Dostmohammadi and the 45-year-old, who had reportedly recently ended their romantic relationship, had both been drinking that evening.

Dostmohammadi and the 12-year-old had started dancing in the living room, when he started touching her ‘in a way that did not feel ok’.

When her mother went to the bathroom he put his hand underneath her dress and underwear and touched her genitals, court documents state.

The 12-year-old told her mother who confronted Dostmohammadi, but no action was taken.

The perpetrator was allowed to stay in the family home, which the girl said ‘felt weird’.

Will the state intervene and give this little girl back to her father?

Probably not.

Will this 45-year-old cunt get charged with accessory to a crime? Child abuse? Accomplice to child molestation?

Nope.

Even the Afghan criminal, who was convicted, only got community service and a £1,336 fine. That’ll teach him!

I won’t single out Swedish men like others do. They are in a country with an extremely powerful and psychopathic anti-white state apparatus. Imagine if the Anti-Defamation League and Femen teamed up to run a totally unopposed dictatorship. It’s not easy.

But I will still reiterate my earlier point: men need to get angrier.

When Rachel Dolezal declared herself “trans-racial,” thus justified in taking a plush NAACP job, the Judeo-left universally condemned her as a con-artist and usurper.

Somehow, pretending to be something you biologically aren’t doesn’t apply to trannies. They don’t bother explaining the difference, they just launch mob attacks against you if you ask too many questions.

The J-left has a term for feminists who reject the idea that men who dress up like women and take hormones are female: “TERFs” (trans-exclusionary radical feminists).

Most Antifa PC militias have green-lit TERFs. They have orders to kill/assault them if they show their faces in public.

But in Montreal, it looks like the kooky feminists are organizing to take down the male homo appointed by the local elites to lead them.

The system is taking the transsexual’s side.

Montreal Gazette:

Gabrielle Bouchard began her term as president of the Fédération des femmes du Québec with a call for women’s equality, echoing the demands of leaders of the province’s main feminist organization going back to its creation more than 50 years ago.

But a month into the job, Bouchard has faced a backlash over what sets her apart from her predecessors: that she was born male.

As the first transgender woman to head the federation, Bouchard’s ability to speak for women has been challenged by some feminists who portray her gender transition as a lifestyle choice.

“Is a trans woman a real woman?” asked the headline above one Journal de Montréal column. “Being a woman is not a choice or an identity,” the head of a splinter feminist group wrote in another column critical of Bouchard’s election.

Bouchard, 49, said she did not expect her arrival as president to stir such controversy. “I had to realize that it is a big deal, because we are still at a point where we tolerate some identities, or we tolerate some people who are at the margins . . . as long as they stay where we believe they are supposed to be,” she said in an interview.

“If women are going out of the places that we create for them, then we start to see a backlash.”

Disagreement in feminist circles over the place of trans women is not new. In Canada, transgender woman Kimberly Nixon lost a long court battle in 2007 after a Vancouver rape crisis centre refused to let her work as a counselor because she was not born female.

In the United States and the United Kingdom, tensions occasionally flare between trans activists and a fringe of radical feminists who insist on regarding transgender women as men.

Last year, the Nigerian author and feminist Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie stirred controversy in an interview with a British TV network in which she argued that the transgender experience should not be “conflated” with women’s experience.

“It’s about the way the world treats us, and I think if you’ve lived in the world as a man with the privileges that the world accords to men and then sort of change gender, it’s difficult for me to accept that then we can equate your experience with the experience of a woman who has lived from the beginning as a woman and who has not been accorded those privileges that men are,” she said.

…

The assault on Bouchard’s leadership was led by columnist Denise Bombardier, who wrote that the goal of trans activists is to “smash the reality of the two sexes to impose an appalling vision where neither man nor woman would exist any more.”

Diane Guilbault, who broke from the federation in 2013 and founded the organization Pour les droits des femmes du Québec, said it is one thing for Bouchard to advocate for trans rights, as she did in her previous job at Concordia University.

But for her to speak on behalf of Quebec women is a step too far, Guilbault said in an interview.

“We think the experience of a woman who is born a woman is completely different from the experience of a man who decides one day to present himself as a woman,” she said.

“It’s not enough to say, ‘I feel that I am a woman, so I can speak in the name of women.’ For us it’s the same as saying, ‘I feel black, so I can speak in the name of blacks.’ ”

Canada is so far gone that the ongoing culture war is middle-aged dykes and faggots who mutilate their penises arguing over what a woman is.

When it comes to cultural Marxism and “progress,” the (((nation-retarders))) will never be satisfied. They will keep shifting the poles of degeneracy, and refuse to tell us when they want this ride to end.

America is no exception. We already see trannies like Blair White being promoted by (((Dave Rubin))) and co. as the new conservative thought-leaders.

If you’re a young, white, heterosexual man, the modern West’s death throes are intense and insane. But take solace in the fact that this can’t go on forever. And be organized so that when it all comes down, we will fill the political vacuum.

Tiger Woods, a negro constantly in the headlines for sex scandals, dresses up as a pimp version of St. Nick called “Mac Daddy Santa” for his kids every year.

Sports writer Alex Myers, a Jew, thinks this is nothing but wholesome good fun!

The “proud” caublasian has used his immense wealth to date only the blondest women possible. This guy is obsessed with white women. Here are two examples of the type of hoes he likes.

Don’t expect him to have any professional consequences for this display.

Golf Digest:

Sadly, Tiger Woods didn’t give the world a taste of “Mac Daddy Santa” in 2017, but that doesn’t mean his infamous Christmas character didn’t surface at home. In a recent interview with the PGA Tour, Tiger explained (sort of) this, um, interesting tradition, and how it almost caused him serious bodily harm.

“Last year I burned my face off trying to dye my goatee, which is never going to happen again,” Woods says in a video clip.

Yikes. As if this guy needs to worry about any more injuries.

But despite the dye mishap, Woods says Mac Daddy Santa — colored goatee or not — is here to stay.

“Kids absolutely love it. They love when I do something crazy,” Woods continues. “It provides something that our family does each and every year, even as they get older, I’m still going to do it. And they’re still going to say it’s me or ‘dad, you look ridiculous,’ or anything like that. But it’s something they’re always going to remember for the rest of their lives.”

(((Myers))) omits the full context, or in more frank terms, lies.

What is a “Mac Daddy,” Mr. Myers?

The term comes from a 1973 blaxploitation movie called “The Mack.” It’s a story about a career criminal nigger who eludes evil racist white policemen to become the top sex trafficker in his city.

It’s an inspiring story of white women and their enlightened natural ally (according to Jews), the black man, intersectionally cooperating to defeat the White Supremacist Patriarchy!

Information is scant about the director, Michael Campus, who is not black.

Jew or not? You decide!

This clearly wasn’t important enough to bring up in Golf Digest. The Jews who work in the media either think this kind of behavior is nothing out of the ordinary, or want you to think it’s normal.

A father takes on the persona of a Santa Claus who sells women for sex for his heavily race-mixed 8 and 10-year-old kids every Christmas. A truly Weimerican Christmas story!

In the latest act of homophobic repression ushered in by the Fascist Trump/Pence regime, two consenting LGBTP adults are being convicted of LOVE.

A mother who recently reconnected with her homosexual daughter decided to tap into the paraphilic tendencies of fags and take it one step further. The duo wanted to adopt children and believed getting married would aid them in this quest.

The slippery slope the Jews in the media said was a figment of a bigoted Christian imagination in the 90s and 2000s is sliding down gracefully – just as they planned all along!

Fox News:

An Oklahoma woman who married her biological mother in 2016 after they reunited and allegedly “hit it off” pleaded guilty to incest Tuesday.

Misty Spann, 26, of Duncan, Okla., pleaded guilty in Stephens County District Court and under the deal was sentenced to 10 years of probation.

Her mother, Patricia Ann Spann, 44, has pleaded not guilty to incest. Her court date was slated for January. She could face 10 years in prison if found guilty, Tulsa World reported.

Prosecutors said Patricia Spann also married one of her sons in 2008. The marriage was annulled in 2010 due to “incest,” The Associated Press reported.

The mother said she thought the marriage to Misty was legal because she had lost custody of her daughter and two sons years ago and is not listed on their birth certificates.

…

Smith said the mother-daughter-duo was attempting to adopt a child and believed their marriage would shorten the process.

What is surprising is that the state actually prosecuted these two freaks. Under present legal precedents for overturning queer solicitation and sodomy laws (that it is between two consenting adults), how is incest still illegal?

Not long ago, the Jew college professor David Epstein argued this in court after he was accused of having sex with his daughter. He compared his actions to homosexual activity and beat the felonies.

All it would take is one half-hearted, mailed-in (((ACLU))) Supreme Court challenge and incest will be made legal. The hard part of cracking open Pandora’s mudbox was already accomplished in the decades-long LGBTP campaign by the social engineers.

The reason they haven’t done it yet is they don’t think the time is right, it could provoke resistance. The Silent Majority may be just a silent plurality at this point, but in 20 years when America is evenly spit by multiple ethnic groups as a chaotic and incoherent mess, they’ll slip it under the door with pedophilia.