Previously: Media Shocked That RFK Supporters Don’t Care About Sex “Scandals”

Nuzzi is scuzzy.

I’ve known about this bitch for a long time, and she’s always done dirty things to innocent people.

They call her “Top Slut” for a reason.

New York Post:

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is investigating a possible lawsuit against sexting New York magazine writer Olivia Nuzzi — who allegedly “bombarded him with increasingly pornographic photos and videos” while tricking him into unblocking her numbers, according to a mutual friend.

Kennedy, 70, has hired security expert Gavin de Becker to probe the saga because he is allegedly pursuing civil — and potentially criminal — litigation against the 31-year-old star political reporter, according to Jessica Read Kraus, who knows them both.

Is she really a “star”?

She became famous because she is allegedly “marginally attractive” and supposedly “reasonably competent at sucking cock.”

She’s no Taylor Swift.

“This had nothing to do with romance,” de Becker said of the sordid saga. “He was being chased by porn.”

Nuzzi — who was placed on leave last week — allegedly tricked the married politician into receiving her racy messages after he first blocked her number over a flirtatious remark she made just two weeks after her profile on him was published in November 2023, according to Kraus.

“A few weeks later, Nuzzi emailed him, asking to be unblocked, claiming she had urgent information about a hit piece being prepared against him,” Kraus wrote on her “House Inhabit” Substack.

“He unblocked her for that conversation, but later that night, she sent him a provocative picture, prompting him to block her again,” Kraus alleged.

For the next eight months, Kraus claims, Kennedy kept the Washington correspondent’s number blocked — aside from a handful of times when she reached out from different emails and numbers “insisting” they speak for “urgent discussions about an imminent hit piece.”

“Once unblocked, she bombarded him with increasingly pornographic photos and videos that he found difficult to resist. After brief exchanges, he would block her again,” Kraus alleged.

Other friends Kraus said she spoke to believe Nuzzi allegedly “set him up.”

…

“Olivia would ask me almost intimate questions about him and his relationships with staff and his wife after each campaign stop — who he was seen talking to, what his mood was like, and whether he showed any signs of flirtation,” Kraus wrote.

Yeah, I can believe it.

Female journalists are just prostitutes.

It’s worse than Harvey Weinstein, what goes on at these news websites, and then the Jews they suck send them out to suck others for the big scoop.

What a monster.

Olivia Nuzzi’s ex-fiance Ryan Lizza confirms broken engagement after RFK Jr. sexting scandal https://t.co/TeV65oF1kJ pic.twitter.com/kSB02GjwxN

— New York Post (@nypost) September 20, 2024

In his philosophical treatise, Plato wrote: “teens love big cocks.”

Thousands of years later, we are finding out just how right he was.

Wall Street Journal:

Lauren Anjema was in sixth grade the first time a boy asked her to send him a nude photo of herself. “It was a ‘If you love me you’ll send me this’ kind of thing,” said Ms. Anjema, now 18.

As social isolation and device usage soared during the pandemic, digital-media experts say the sharing of nude selfies and other sexually explicit messages among teens and tweens has only gotten worse.

Bark, an online safety service that parents and schools can pay to monitor kids’ devices, found the average daily volume of children’s text messages that included sexual content is up approximately 37% from pre-pandemic levels, from 0.51% of all activities in July 2019 to 0.7% in May 2021.

A 2018 meta-analysis on sexting—the act of sending nude photos, videos or sexual messages—published in JAMA Pediatrics found that 1 in 7 adolescents have sent sexts, 1 in 4 have received sexts and 1 in 8 have forwarded sexts without the consent of the person in the photo. Several teens I interviewed said sharing nudes has become a prerequisite for dating, with girls feeling pressured to send photos.

Yes, surely the girls are the victims here.

Who else?

The ramifications of requesting, sharing and possessing nude photos of minors can range from reputational damage to criminal prosecution. It’s illegal in many states for teens to have such photos on their phone, even if the exchange was consensual.

A study published in 2019 found that more than three times as many girls as boys felt pressured to send a sext, and that twice as many girls as boys had been asked to send a sext. Sheri Madigan, an associate professor of psychology at the University of Calgary and an author of the 2018 meta-analysis, conducted an as-yet-unpublished update that found a shift to girls receiving more sexts than boys.

This raises a question of consent, said Dr. Madigan. Are girls increasingly receiving unwanted sexts from boys?

…

“A guy will send their picture and say, ‘Your turn,’ but you didn’t ask for it,” said Ms. Anjema, of Ontario, Canada. She said she continued to receive regular requests for nudes from male classmates as well as from strangers on social media throughout middle school, high school and into college. “Girls never ask for nude photos of guys. It’s always unsolicited,” she said.

Sexting can also have a long-term impact on teens’ developing sense of self-worth and view of what constitutes a healthy relationship. Vivie Myrick, a 17-year-old singer and social-media influencer from Marion, Ark., said she has been asked for nudes at least once a week since she was 14. Sometimes it’s boys she knows, and sometimes it’s strangers who follow her on TikTok.

“Most of the time they’ll just DM me and say, ‘Nudes?’” she said. “For me it’s been super harmful—and I’m someone who can stand up and say I’m not doing that. Most girls assume boys only want them for their body. It’s made me more insecure. Every time I’m asked, I go, ‘So this is how every guy looks at me?’”

Her advice to other girls: “Stop giving attention to guys who ask for that. Block them. Think about who could see the photos,” she said. “You do not want your dad to see your nudes.”

It is truly amazing that we are still doing “victimized teenage girls because boys only care about their bodies” in 2021, with a 100% divorce rate and an 85% incel rate.

These girls are lying.

They are not sexually exploited for their bodies, they use their bodies to sexually exploit men.

If there was a rule that said “no nudes allowed,” boys would follow that rule. Girls would not, because they want to send these images to manipulate boys.

Furthermore, they don’t care if the boys spread them around and it becomes a scandal – in fact, they create scandals like that on purpose, because they love drama, and they love being the center of attention.

The solution to the nude pic plague is to ban girls from having phones, period.

Whose idea was it to give them phones in the first place?

Was it the Jews? 

All these sluts should get charged with the full weight of “production and distribution of child pornography” laws and be sent to prison until they’re too old for anyone to care about their nudes.

Almost a year ago, Russian Orthodox Church leader Patriarch Kirill warned that smartphones foretell the coming of the Antichrist.

Now we’re hearing about primary school children being investigated for sexting.

Daily Mail:

Hundreds of primary school children have been investigated by police for sexting in less than three years, including pupils as young as four.

Figures from 27 police forces in England and Wales revealed more than 6,000 under 14s were investigated for sending indecent messages, including 306 children younger than ten.

Sharing an indecent image of anyone who is underage is illegal in England and Wales, even if a child takes a picture of themselves and shares it consensually.

Prepubescent kids sending indecent images of themselves to their peers does sound like something that would happen in the times of the Antichrist.

Then puberty kicks in and the number of incidents skyrockets.

Between January 2017 and August 2019, there were 6,499 cases of children aged under 14 who were investigated for sending naked photos of themselves or other minors to their peers.

One nine-year-old girl was noted as an ‘offender’ for sharing indecent photos on Instagram, according to data seen by The Guardian, while a nine-year-old boy was put on a police database for sharing a naked selfie on Facebook’s private messaging service.

What are nine-year-old kids doing on Instagram and Facebook in the first place? The minimum age required to use those is supposed to be 13.

Whether these companies are unable to enforce age requirements or just don’t care is irrelevant to the fact that parents should be aware of what their kids are doing with the glowing screen devices.

The Internet isn’t just something that people can access for information; it is also a means to access people.

The figures revealed a steep rise in the number of investigations, from 183 per month in 2017 to 241 per month this year.

There were 17 six-year-olds, nine five-year-olds and four children aged just four investigated, despite the age of criminal responsibility being ten years old.

Of the 6,499 investigations, just 30 led to a child being charged, cautioned or summoned to court.

Most probes were dropped as police decided there was no public interest in taking further action, which usually indicates officers believe the sexting was consensual and not coerced.

These kids are just reproducing what they see all around them.

They are taking cues and acting accordingly.

Children nowadays are exposed to a constant stream of sexual imagery.

Things were already bad in that regard ten years ago.

BBC News, February 26, 2010:

Children are being increasingly exposed to sexual imagery and their parents have limited opportunities to stop it, a report for the Home Office warns.

The report calls for tougher regulation of sexual imagery in adverts and a ban on selling “lads’ mags” to under-16s.

…

The report said this “drip-drip” exposure was distorting young people’s perceptions of themselves, encouraging boys to become fixated on being macho and dominant, while girls in turn presented themselves as sexually available and permissive.

One outcome had been the rise of sexual bullying in which girls felt compelled to post topless or naked pictures on social networks, it added.

Ten years later and four-year-old kids are being investigated for sexting while nine-year-old girls are posting nudes on Instagram.

Maybe we should just stop trying to raise kids in the same environment in which adults live.

Maybe we should create Childhood Camps or something totally isolated from the outside world, throw all kids in there, and use artificial intelligence and robots to raise them.

If not even adults can escape the constant sexualization siege of Modernity, how can we expect to be able to shield kids from it?

RELATED: Are Cellphones Going to Cause the Apocalypse?

It is baffling that the Big Tech companies are able to get away with wielding as much influence as they do.

Imagine if the oil companies were actually as evil and omnipotent as the Left likes to present them as. They couldn’t come close to the influence that Big Tech wields. Elections can be made or lost with Google putting its thumb on the scales for one side or another.

Everyone in politics is afraid to go after the companies because, presumably, they’re afraid of their nude pics getting leaked out as revenge.

One man, however, seems to be comfortable enough with his sexting game to no longer be bullied around.

RT:

Austria will introduce a tax of 3 percent of the online profits of internet giants, defined as companies with sales of more than €750 million ($865 million) a year, Chancellor Sebastian Kurz said on Thursday. 

That cute pouting slam piggy to his right tells me more about Kurz than hours of reading policy papers and scrutinizing his stance on various issues ever could.

Kurz clearly has killer sexting game and ain’t afraid of the world knowin’.

Come to think of it – in the near future, the only politicians capable of mounting an effective resistance to globo-homo will either have to be drawn from the Amish community or know how to handle fat chicks online demanding dick pics.

Everyone else will have kompromat on them and be Big Tech’s bitches. 

Also, now that I think about it – and using the criteria I settled on above –  male porn stars with no shame will soon have a clear shot at the presidency (for lack of any competitors.)

Bruh. 

I wrote that out as a joke a few seconds ago, but I’ve legit half-convinced myself that Big Tech is going to usher in an era of porn star politicians and there’s nothing we can do about it unless we start taxing them now.

We better get on this.

It looks like Congressman Joe Barton has been victimized by the crazy kike Laura Loomer!

What a strange story this is. Sexually graphic footage of Republican Congressman Joe Barton has been leaked online. Apparently Barton sent a private video showing himself masturbating to a woman he was sexually involved with. That footage is now out in the wild.

Other than being a disgusting out of shape old man who exercised poor judgment, it’s hard to say that he did anything wrong. The worst you could say is that he committed adultery but even that stance is flimsy. Barton says he recorded the footage while separated from his wife while they were in the middle of a divorce. It’s hard to blame the old man for wanting a piece of ass while his divorce went through. It looks like he’s been victimized in a weird case of revenge porn.

The craziest part about this is that the devious kike Laura Loomer is taking credit for obtaining the video and leaking it to Alex Jones. Jones desperate for clicks and attention decided to post the footage.

I've given video footage of @RepJoeBarton to @infowars.

Let it be known that MORE than just a d**k pic exists. I didn't want to post the video online until we learn more about the details of his text exchange (it could be consensual) but the vid is now in @RealAlexJones's hands.

— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) November 22, 2017

Loomer is claiming that this story is in the public interest because Barton was separated but still married to his wife when he recorded the footage. This according to her represented “cheating” and had to be exposed.

.@RepJoeBarton cheated on Americans with #DACA, and now he's been caught cheating on his wife. So much for being a "Conservative". #DrainTheSwamphttps://t.co/KOk7CWfxoX

— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) November 22, 2017

Let’s be honest though, is footage showing some old man jerking off really in the public’s interest? That seems highly doubtful considering the context. This was something that occurred between two consenting adults. What’s most significant about this is that Loomer and Jones may have violated revenge porn laws.

In 2015, Texas passed a law against revenge porn. It looks like Jones may have realized that he broke the law by posting the footage because it is no longer available on his site.

Laura Loomer is one ugly kike bitch! Whatever you do, don’t put her photos through MakeApp! Her appearance without make up causes graphical processors to melt! They can’t handle her ugliness!

And then we have the question of how Loomer was able to get this footage to begin with. Was she the one having sex with Barton? A serious question considering some of the insanity she’s been involved with. If not, who gave her the footage? These things will probably come out eventually so Loomer should just come clean with the facts!

Barton has said that he has no intention of resigning from Congress over the situation. He might be the standard cuckold establishment Republican, but everything indicates that he was the victim of a crime here. It honestly wouldn’t be a surprise to see him file some lawsuits. Loomer and Jones should watch out as they could be in some trouble over this.

And I thought Laura was in trouble when she got caught lying about her tire!

It must be getting really hard for the Clinton Cabal to find relevant proxies to defend them in the media who aren’t either involved in the Hillary/Huma/Weiner fiasco up to their necks already, and/or are under indictment themselves. I mean, they’ve rolled out Kucinich? Seriously?

But, as Maria Bartiromo so accurately pointed out in the above clip, the Clinton racketeers have had no trouble whatsoever finding accomplices willing to carry their polluted water for them.

Zero Hedge:

 Social Media Blackout? FBI Emails Are Not ‘Trending’ On Twitter, Facebook, Buzzfeed, Or Snapchat

They are not known as ‘weapons of mass distraction’ for nothing…

In the 24 hours since FBI Director Comey dropped perhaps the biggest bombshell of the entire Presidential campaign, sending Democrats (and media) scrambling headless-chicken-like for answers (and blame-scaping), does anyone else find it odd that ‘FBI Emails’ does not appear to be a hot topic, trending, big deal on any social media?

Snapchat…”Hot”

h/t @CharlieKrik11

Facebook… “Trending”

h/t @MichaelDuncan

Twitter…”Top Moments”

h/t @kierobar

Buzzfeed… “Trending Now”

There it is. Just a few days from the election, with a new scandal unlike any ever seen during a U.S. presidential race, and look at the nonsense that’s trending.

It’s long been known that Twitter manipulates what hashtags and stories trend there. This is confirmation that not only is Twitter doing it, they’re all doing it.

We’re all supposed to believe that whatever is being talked about most is what trends on social media, since the main driver of social media is it’s mass of users, but this clearly isn’t the case. Those of us who have kept an eye on these trends over the years have always noted that if the trends were actually based on ground-up, grassroots movements, terms like #WhiteGenocide and #OpenBordersForIsrael would be perpetually trending. There are so many others that should, by the numbers, have had their time in the sun as well. #DukeForSenate is the perfect example.

Who do these uppity goyim think they are?

So basically, we’re operating under the same system as most of us have had to deal with our entire lives. The media presumes to spin it’s own narratives, now social media goes along in lock-step, and we’re expected to swallow it whole.

But there’s a big difference this time: The internet has given us all access to the full spectrum of news and information, and they can’t control the entire internet (at least not yet).

Can you imagine how different things will be when Glorious Leader wins this election by a landslide and all these vermin are forced out into the sunlight?

Stormers, keep the good word alive on all your social media. Do it for The Leader!